Talk:FDD's Long War Journal

921:

have to say that I have no dog in this fight, that is I am not affiliated with PMI or any of their critics. This article resulted from my own curiosity about the source of the Iranian vessel/hijacking story, which I came upon in a different source but lead me to PMI. I realize that there is not much material out there about PMI and so they may not be regarded by the Knowledge (XXG) community as significant. If this page is deemed non-significant then so be it, but I am of the philosophy that if a news company can make measurable impact on the web then it is worthy of mention. A Google search of "iranian ship sick pirates long war" received 68,700 hits, which suggests that the impact is not small. --

1877:

not violate the synthesis policy when I typed my claims If you read the synthesis article properly, you will also find it claims a statement like "Smith claimed that Jones committed plagiarism by copying references from another author's book. Jones responded that it is acceptable scholarly practice to use other people's books to find new references" is acceptable. By citing the author, and not just the news source, I also referenced the Huffington Post article in a way that complies with this policy too. I clearly wrote that Roggio made the claims and that Kaus criticized him. Knowledge (XXG) is not a Long War Journal fan page and I suggest you read the

491: 1634:

information is clearly stated in the LWJ and FDD website information backed up by secondary sources. Cherry picking all information from one source and ignoring additional information from other sources is the problem. Let's be clear the LWJ is a "project", "blog" of the FDD and not to mention that is misleading what brings us back to the problem we have to fix. You claim that all the information i have listed can not be sufficient verified? Yes we do use primary sources and here this information is backed up by two of them in addition to at least a secondary source with no contradiction.

793: 766: 459: 635: 608: 196: 645: 2094:"After Baitullah Mehsud was killed in August 2009, Roggio claimed on August 6, 2009 that a US intelligence official told him US officials thought Mehsud was still alive. This was not accurate, as Pentagon spokesman Jeff Morrell and National Security Advisor James Jones claimed that US officials were 90% certain he was killed and they had yet to see any evidence to assume otherwise, and the Pakistan Taliban later confirmed he was killed." 853: 738: 475: 119: 94: 186: 165: 1783:. The LWJ developed out of Roggio's former blogs. The LWJ was created by Roggio. Roggio also writes most of the content and Roggio is the editor of the LWJ. (means also that there is no editorial oversight for most of the content as we have in other RS). The LWJ is pretty much the one man show of Bill Roggio. It is always good to present both sites to achieve NPOV so that i do not see any problem here. 2211: 344: 540: 519: 63: 416: 405: 394: 372: 1480:@Wikireader41 you are edit warring by removing tags that are necessary and you refuse to engage in a civil debate and you have not addressed the given arguments that justify the tag and you are not willing to have a civil debate and instead you have repeatedly removed it in an edit war style. Please do not do that and instead engage in a civil debate. 302: 270: 383: 1876:

and claimed in it "A senior al Qaeda leader who is one of the terror group's most dangerous military commanders and strategists, and who was reportedly killed in a drone strike last June, has been spotted at a meeting with the leader of the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan." I most certainly did

968:

Can't find any independent sources for "Public Multimedia" article, and most of it appears to be OR. There does however appear to be several sources talking about or citing "The Long War Journal", which redirects to this article. I'm not sure if there's enough to determine notability, but a rename to

2467:

refers to personal conclusions and allows reliable conclusions. In fact, "A and B, therefore C" is acceptable only if a reliable source has published the same argument in relation to the topic of the article." The input is quite reliable and refers to the same argument:the terrorist's fate. Roggio

2263:

1695:

Cla68, i feel like you do not know what a NPOV tag is. The article is misleading. The problems have been clearly stated. Why don't you fix them? If nobody does than i am going to edit the article as soon as i get the time. Do you have further questions regarding the content issues? Then feel free to

2462:

My earlier statement was "quoted as well as criticized." That doesn't exactly mean I said all the journalists sourced criticized him. The claim that the articles criticize the Long War Journal, which I never claimed, is also not necessary, as they firmly contradict the major input in the Long War

2258:

1549:

Cla68, to discuss on the talk page is not edit warring and adding sourced information to the article also not. Do i need to start an RFC to add sourced material to the article? You have not addressed my last arguments Wikireader41 refuses to take part in a civil debate at all and repeatedly removed

2405:

I have to agree with the IP. Roggio also believed the Pakistan Taliban when they said Atiyah Rahman was still alive. Ayman Zawahiri personally confirmed his death several months later. He also insisted that the deputy leader of the ISI and Saad Bin Laden were still alive. Iraqi officials confirmed

920:

OK, I've done my best to add third party sources and context. These may not be as reliable as would be hoped since all sources are blogs. However, I would argue that due to the nature of context, namely that the Long War Journal has made a minor splash in the blogosphere, this is appropriate. I do

888:

In regards to the speedy deletion. This page is currently a stub, which I intend to expand upon or have others do so. I assume that the current shortness of the article is why it was tagged. As for context and importance: PMI appears to be associated with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies,

1633:

Cla68. That the articles are almost entirely based on one source in not a good thing. It is always bad. There is no contradiction with this source for the additional information that i have listed. To add this additional information is not a significant shift of anything. It is a good thing. The

1505:

1) The debate was started 2) The discussion about neutrality issues has not been stopped for more than a few days. 3) The problems in the article have not been resolved. 4) Not all editors have agreed to remove it. 5) Not all relevant arguments have been addressed. Do you want me to repeat these

1583:

Cla68 the article is misleading, just to repeat me one more time. 1) The LWJ is a "project", "blog" of the FDD with their mission what has not been made clear in the lead sentences. 2) The LWJ is almost entirely written by FDD fellows. (just look at the last few years.) Most of the articles are

1346:

Cla68 the tags can be remove when we have worked it out on the talk page. The article does not make clear that the LWJ is a project of the FDD and that it is written by FDD fellows and that has not changed. Why do we need secondary sources for this information while we do accept self published

1213:

Because the lede is a summary. I think that both current tags are unnecessary. wikipedia only requires that editors be neutral NOT organizations/sources we use ( of course we need to give DUE weight to everyone in proportion to their prominence) . that is why New York Times with its liberal

1613:. So, you appear to be proposing to place major emphasis in this article on an aspect that would require the use of primary sources. Do I have that right, are you proposing using primary sources to place significant emphasis in this article on the connection between the FDD and 1316:

Iqinn, you've stated your case for why you think the article isn't neutral (doesn't mention the "neoconservative" FDD in the lede), but you haven't stated why you feel the article isn't factually accurate. You need to justify why you placed that tag on the article.

1759:

There are a couple of problems with this addition to the article. First, the Huffington Post is a blog site, although I haven't checked to see if it is generally considered to be a reliable source in Knowledge (XXG). Second, it's from 2006, one year before

1710:

Since no one else has agreed with you over two months that the article is NPOV, I'm going to remove the tag. We can revisit it if someone objects anew. My reasoning for why the sources and information you want to include are inappropriate are listed above.

1678:

Iqinn, to put an NPOV tag on an article and then say you don't have time to work with other editors to fix it is not very helpful. I'm trying to work through the issue with you, but can't do so if are unable or unwilling to participate sufficiently.

1112:

What is the connection between Bill Roggio, The Long War Journal and the neoconservative think tank "Foundation for Defense of Democracies"? The Long war Journal website in big says that it is a project of the "Foundation for Defense of Democracies"

466: 280: 1419:

Iquinn my counterpoints did adress your concerns about the lede. you have not addressed both my and Cla68's concerns about why you think this article is not NPOV or factually incorrect. In any case Cla68 has made some changes so I am removing the

747: 618: 482: 284: 889:

and may act as an outlet for the advocacy of the group. Further, The Long War Journal has recently published a report on an incident involving piracy on an Iranian vessel in the Gulf of Aden that is getting some play in the internet rumor mill.

2111:

got it wrong. Instead, it is attempting draw a conclusion and put it in Knowledge (XXG)'s voice, contrary to WP:SYN which states "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the

2388:. The authenticity of his was claim was questionable, as I could find no major news agency that repeated this claim and more than two weeks before the Taliban confirmed Mehsud's death, the Pentagon suggested US officials thought otherwise. 1331:

I added mention of the FDD to the lede. Iqinn, do you have secondary sources about the LWJ staff being fellows for the FDD? If not, please justify why the NPOV tag should not be removed if you don't agree that it should now be removed.

38:

policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or

943:

I agree on the significance of this page; it is worrying in the case of the MV Iran Deyanat how stories which originally appeared on the Long War Journal - and nowhere else - ended up being quoted by reputable news services as factual.

2384:

at a meeting with the leader of the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan." His reports about Baitullah Mehsud after his death were also controversial. He claimed US official confirmed to him "Baitullah is alive" after he was reported

2375:

the November 2008 Predator strike in North Waziristan that was also thought to have killed Abu Zubair al Masri and two other al Qaeda operatives." In his report about Ilyas Kashmiri, he could've demonstrated neutrality by titling it

1448:

Iquinn you are the one edit warring and placing unnecessary tags. consider this your final warning. Both me and Cla68 agree that the tags are unnecessary. you are the only one being disruptive and not willing to listen to sensible

1584:

either written by Bill Roggio or Thomas Joscelyn. 3) Why is Thomas Joscelyn (also FDD fellow) not mentioned at all? He is the senior editor he and his role should be described. There are only a few key people and he is one of them.

1939:

My edits were not based from own personal opinion at all and were quite neutral. Again, I suggest you read both Roggio's own articles and the synthesis page better next time. Roggio also titled an earlier article on the website

1036:

the article. I think the only issue with it now is the question of notability. I think the topic is notable enough to have its own article. I welcome additional input. If others agree, we can remove the notability tag.

1214:

leanings is a widely accepted & used source. the tags need to go. LWJ is a notable source widely quoted in media and who runs it and supports it is only of secondary importance not necessary to mention it in lede.--

893:

No, it was not tagged for being short, plenty of articles are valid stubs. I tagged this one because it does not indicate why the company is important or significant. Even if it survives speedy it will have to comply with

2424:. This was discussed in the above RfC and consensus was to remove the material. You can open another RfC to try and change the consensus, but you can not just add the material back into the article against consensus. 2612: 1364:

Using the FDD website as a source and then putting that information in this article could be considered synthesis. Does the FDD website list Roggio and the others as fellows in the context of their work with the

498: 288: 843: 1568:

Iqinn, to make sure I understand correctly, your concern that the article isn't NPOV is because it doesn't mention that Bill Roggio and Paul Hanusz are fellows with the FDD? Is that your only concern?

1587:

The article should clearly describe the key people and should clearly describe who is behind the website just to come back to the point where this discussion started. These points have not been fixed.

2949: 2959: 2333:

I'm afraid the opinions expressed here are inaccurate and the content in my edit was quite reliable and neutral. Read Roggio's articles for yourselves. For example, he titled one article

1195:

Why does the lede does not mention that the "Long War Journal" is a project of the neoconservative "Foundation for Defense of Democracies" and why does it not mention that Bill Roggio is a

2999: 2944: 2337:

and claimed in it "A senior al Qaeda leader who is one of the terror group's most dangerous military commanders and strategists, and who was reportedly killed in a drone strike last June,

1944:. To also claim that I was accusing other editors of being fans when I stated that Knowledge (XXG) is not a fanpage is also uncalled for. It was just a simple warning not to violate the 675: 2406:

the deputy leader is dead and Osama Bin Laden confirmed in his letters recovered in his mansion that Saad is dead. Roggio considers terrorists more reliable than government officials. --

2954: 2622: 2380:

and claiming "A senior al Qaeda leader who is one of the terror group's most dangerous military commanders and strategists, and who was reportedly killed in a drone strike last June,

2613:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110506084738/http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-26/world/afghanistan.insurgent.killed_1_long-war-journal-top-al-qaeda-leader-foreign-fighters?_s=PM%3AWORLD

48: 1128:

I think it means that they are sponsored (i.e. at least partially funded) by that organization. Lacking a reliable, secondary, confirming source, however, I can't say for sure.

1554:

to keep a certain POV. You have either to address all the given arguments what has not been done with most them or you agree that i edit the article by adding sourced material.

692: 3019: 1664:

Cla68, if you get the time or anyone else go ahead and fix these problems by editing the article. If nobody does than i am going to edit the article as soon as i get the time.

357: 314: 2616: 1900:

appears to be synthesis, because it is your interpretation of what the sources are saying, not what they are actually saying. Also, the section on Roggio is from before the

2686: 1270:

No not at all. you started the discussion I raised some valid counter points and you are deliberately avoiding answering them perhaps because you do not have an answer.--

2306:

Wrong GregJackP. I typed my original request on the bottom page and it wound up here. The website needs technical improvements. I'll again try to put it on the bottom

2862: 2858: 2844: 2752: 2748: 2734: 2042: 728: 343: 2706: 555:, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the 1506:

arguments? There is nothing that would justify the removal of the tag. So please stop edit warring and engage in a civil debate about the content issue. Thank you

3029: 2994: 2102: 718: 2830: 1535:

Iqinn, neither me nor Wikireader agree with your proposed changes to the article. Instead of edit warring, I suggest posting an RfC to invite expanded comment.

682: 252: 590: 2602: 1829:, so I don't think it is relevant to this article. So, I am going to remove it. If there is a separate article for Roggio, that is where it would belong. 3004: 2929: 1434:

I have clearly stated that and i suggest you stop addressing it instead of edit warring over a tag. There is no consensus to remove the tag at that point.

1088:

is a notable, often quoted expert on counter terrorism issues related to AfPak. I dont see any notability issues at all. good work on LWJ article Cla68.--

242: 1395:

Why could that be synthesis? Seems to be just the question if it is sufficient verified. Yes the FDD website states that very clearly "Bill is the editor

687: 2979: 2969: 2939: 1199:? And how about Thomas Joscelyn another senior fellow of the FDD who is the senior editor of the LWJ. Why can't we find anything about that in the lede? 580: 2027:"Roggio has not reported reliable information on the website at times and his opinions have been quoted as well as criticized by various news outlets." 1377:

information about Roggio's support for conservative bloggers because that article does discuss the relationship in the context of Roggio's work for the

34: 2656: 3014: 833: 2696: 309: 275: 2934: 2676: 2632: 2623:

https://web.archive.org/web/20121105015114/http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2010/09/what-we-know-about-the-planned-terror-plot-in-europe/22850/

2666: 218: 2989: 2984: 2964: 1256:

I think i did. I started the discussion, i have stated the issue (my points) and i have told you that you did not address the issue (my points).

556: 2362: 2348:

and claimed in it "Rashid Rauf, an al Qaeda leader who is in charge of al Qaeda's external operations branch responsible for attacks in Europe,

2128: 1764:

started, and comments on Roggio's blogging. So, I'm not sure the opinion is relevant for this article, perhaps instead for the Roggio article.

658: 613: 2031: 1142: 318: 2626: 2924: 2617:

http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-26/world/afghanistan.insurgent.killed_1_long-war-journal-top-al-qaeda-leader-foreign-fighters?_s=PM%3AWORLD

2524:

He posted the RfC twice instead of moving it, so I opposed on each. The oppose directly above relates to his comment above, not the RfC.

2371:

and claiming "Rashid Rauf, an al Qaeda leader who is in charge of al Qaeda's external operations branch responsible for attacks in Europe,

2687:

https://web.archive.org/web/20020114191003/http://www.longwarjournal.org/threat-matrix/archives/2011/05/can_ilyas_kashmiri_take_contro.php

2100: 3024: 2974: 2582: 1399:

The Long War Journal (LWJ)", "LWJ is an invaluable resource for military and intelligence officers and national security experts and is

209: 170: 3009: 2469: 2448: 2392: 2307: 2265: 1957: 1949: 1890: 1882: 670: 862: 776: 547: 524: 2840:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2730:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2592: 2464: 2260: 809: 800: 771: 125: 99: 2707:

https://web.archive.org/web/20020114191003/http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/al-qaeda-leader-reported-dead-found-alive-and-well

2690: 2124: 666:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

490: 3034: 2831:

https://web.archive.org/web/20121216033739/http://homeland.house.gov/sites/homeland.house.gov/files/Testimony%20Joscelyn_0.pdf

74: 3039: 2603:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110518125646/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2014755865_somalirapper13.html

1990:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2710: 2324:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2133: 2082: 1348: 1196: 2905: 2795: 2165:

Looking through these, I'd agree with you: the sources don't seem to match up with what's being claimed in the article.

1403:

many vital projects contributing to international security." We should clearly tell our readers who is behind the LWJ.

2834: 2518: 2477: 2415: 2400: 2650: 2487: 2486:

on procedural basis. The requestor of the RfC is clearly ignoring consensus from the above RfC, which just closed.

2389: 2282: 2281:

on procedural basis. The requestor of the RfC is clearly ignoring consensus from the above RfC, which just closed.

1609:, but doesn't mention the FDD. The FDD connection, in secondary sources, is only mentioned briefly in an article in 2657:

https://web.archive.org/web/20121105015114/http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2009/04/al_qaeda_operative_r_1.php

2071: 2606: 1145:

is a non partisan think tank. even if we believe that they are neocons no policy on wp prohibits them being given

2697:

https://web.archive.org/web/20020114191003/http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2012/03/al_qaeda_leader_ilya.php

2359: 2126: 40: 2677:

https://web.archive.org/web/20020114191003/http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2011/05/after_bin_laden_who.php

2633:

https://web.archive.org/web/20121105015114/http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2009/08/baitullah_mehsud_is.php

2861:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2751:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2667:

http://www.webcitation.org/63F3uXgji?url=http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2010/09/osama_bin_ladens_spo.php

47:. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see 988:

Might also be worth merging in with Bill Roggio, who seems to be running it all and has a deal of coverage. --

80: 2896: 2822: 2786: 2660: 2560: 2353: 313:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 130: 104: 2818: 2700: 2670: 2473: 2452: 2396: 2342: 2311: 2269: 1953: 1886: 1730: 1454: 1425: 1275: 1247: 1219: 1154: 1093: 458: 2680: 2636: 2627:

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2010/09/what-we-know-about-the-planned-terror-plot-in-europe/22850/

2386: 2098: 1878: 1648:

Iqinn, why don't you put the exact, cited text you want to add to the article here and we'll discuss it.

1551: 2880:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2868: 2770:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2758: 792: 765: 217:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2821:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2559:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2391:

It needs to be known the website is not exactly 100% reliable and is arguably sensationalistic at times

1945: 1521:

If there is no further reply than i am going to fix the stated problems accordingly starting tomorrow.

2235:

Since the opinions appear to be unanimous so far, I will go ahead and remove the section in question.

1919: 2583:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120201153203/http://www.nogw.com/download/2006_spheres_of_influence.pdf

2201: 1053: 949: 945: 650: 2724: 2356: 2135: 1849:

I removed the Controversies section after checking the sources, because it was a clear violation of

62: 2531: 2497: 2431: 2292: 2186: 2718: 2644: 2593:

https://web.archive.org/web/20121105015114/http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FJ09Ak01.html

2576: 2570: 2226: 2170: 2078:

was started. Also, this criticism is already included in the article under "History and mission"

926: 2865:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2755:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2060: 1970:

There is a clear consensus, that the section is problematic and therefore it should be removed.

634: 607: 2881: 2771: 2691:

http://www.longwarjournal.org/threat-matrix/archives/2011/05/can_ilyas_kashmiri_take_contro.php

1797:

Well, I checked the Kaus blog post and found that the it was misrepresented in the article, so

2514: 2411: 1999:

section as currently written and sourced be included in this article, or modified in any way?

1726: 1450: 1421: 1271: 1243: 1215: 1150: 1089: 907: 201: 2586: 2218: 2014:

Links to this RfC have been listed at the media, military history, and websites wikiprojects.

895: 2814: 2552: 2352:

that was also thought to have killed Abu Zubair al Masri and two other al Qaeda operatives."

1725:

I agree with removal of the NPOV tag. it was completely unnecessary in the 1st place IMO.--

993: 978: 2888: 2778: 2122: 1850: 1146: 1007: 2240: 2198: 2146: 2004: 1927: 1909: 1858: 1834: 1806: 1788: 1769: 1716: 1701: 1684: 1669: 1653: 1639: 1622: 1592: 1574: 1559: 1540: 1526: 1511: 1439: 1408: 1386: 1355: 1337: 1322: 1289: 1261: 1233: 1204: 1186: 1133: 1118: 1075: 1061: 1042: 1015: 2596: 899: 808:

on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the

2847:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2737:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2711:

http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/al-qaeda-leader-reported-dead-found-alive-and-well

2526: 2492: 2426: 2287: 2181: 2024:

In my opinion, the section has multiple issues. I will address it one bite at a time:

2887:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2854: 2777:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2744: 1173:

called it "neoconservative". I don't think that is synthesis, because the article in

2918: 2222: 2166: 2117:

The second paragraph is also synthesis. None of these sources actually say that the

1975: 922: 663: 17: 2910: 2800: 2537: 2503: 2456: 2437: 2367:

In his article about Rashid Rauf, he could've demonstrated neutrality by titling it

2315: 2298: 2273: 2244: 2230: 2204: 2192: 2174: 2150: 2105: 2008: 1978: 1931: 1913: 1862: 1838: 1810: 1792: 1773: 1734: 1720: 1705: 1688: 1673: 1657: 1643: 1626: 1596: 1578: 1563: 1544: 1530: 1515: 1458: 1443: 1429: 1412: 1390: 1359: 1341: 1326: 1293: 1279: 1265: 1251: 1237: 1223: 1208: 1190: 1158: 1137: 1122: 1097: 1079: 1065: 1046: 1019: 997: 982: 953: 930: 911: 852: 2835:

http://homeland.house.gov/sites/homeland.house.gov/files/Testimony%20Joscelyn_0.pdf

2510: 2407: 1780: 1347:

information from the LWJ website? We usually do accept self published information.

903: 2651:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/90-sure-Mehsud-is-dead-Pentagon/Article1-442459.aspx

737: 474: 1868:

I Suggest you Read Both Roggio's Articles and the Synthesis Page Better Next Time

2607:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2014755865_somalirapper13.html

1896:

IP, accusing other editors of being "fans" isn't very helpful. The section you

1085: 1003: 989: 974: 118: 93: 2853:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2743:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2236: 2142: 2000: 1923: 1905: 1854: 1830: 1802: 1784: 1779:

It is perfectly fine to use as it has been dated and attributed to the author

1765: 1712: 1697: 1680: 1665: 1649: 1635: 1618: 1588: 1570: 1555: 1536: 1522: 1507: 1491:

No discussion about neutrality issues was started on this article's talk page.

1435: 1404: 1382: 1351: 1333: 1318: 1285: 1257: 1229: 1200: 1182: 1169: 1129: 1114: 1071: 1057: 1038: 1011: 640: 214: 191: 185: 164: 1284:

Your counter points do not address my points. These things are not disputed.

2056:

doesn't actually link to an article, just to UPI's Arabic page's front page.

1494:

Discussions about neutrality issues have stopped (for more than a few days).

1084:

LWJ is widely quoted by media of many countries across several continents.

552: 662:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 2661:

http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2009/04/al_qaeda_operative_r_1.php

2341:

at a meeting with the leader of the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan."

2197:

Concur. In my opinion, the Long War Journal is a pretty reliable source.

1605:

which is one of the major sources used was a long, exhaustive article on

1550:

the tag edit style instead. Seems to be the case that you two have taken

539: 518: 2701:

http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2012/03/al_qaeda_leader_ilya.php

2671:

http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2010/09/osama_bin_ladens_spo.php

805: 2681:

http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2011/05/after_bin_laden_who.php

2637:

http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2009/08/baitullah_mehsud_is.php

2217:

with all of above. I would recommend to close this RfC right away per

1853:. The sources did not say what the text was trying to make them say. 2378:

Al Qaeda leader Ilyas Kashmiri reportedly spotted at Taliban meeting

2329:

The Information About the Website's Controversies Must Be Preserved

1996: 301: 269: 2369:

Al Qaeda operative Rashid Rauf reported to have survived US strike

2132:

The third paragraph is synthesis. None of the supporting sources

804:, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major 2725:

http://www.thememriblog.org/urdupashtu/blog_personal/en/41890.htm

2355:

Both claims were contradicted by an Al Qaeda eulogy for Kashmiri

1867: 551:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on 748:

WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force

2577:

http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/spheresInfluence.html

2350:

survived the November 2008 Predator strike in North Waziristan

1948:. Next time, I'll to remember more carefully to include this. 56: 26: 851: 736: 489: 473: 457: 342: 2825:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2587:

http://www.nogw.com/download/2006_spheres_of_influence.pdf

2563:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1904:

was started, so I don't think it belongs in this article.

2364:

that suggested Rauf was still believed to have killed.

2335:

Al Qaeda leader Ilyas Kashmiri spotted at Taliban meeting

2074:

criticizes something that Roggio did one year before the

2053: 1874:

Al Qaeda leader Ilyas Kashmiri spotted at Taliban meeting

1373:, not about Roggio himself. For example, I included the 2556: 1971: 1897: 1798: 1757: 1500:

All editors involved in the article agree to remove it.

1033: 2597:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FJ09Ak01.html

2468:

is not a reliable resource and this needs to be known.

2447:

Read the content for yourselves and please be neutral.

2264:

is not a reliable resource and this needs to be known.

2097:

These sentences are synthesis. None of the sources

355:

This article has been checked against the following

213:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2950:

North American military history task force articles

2857:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2747:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 440: 354: 2960:United States military history task force articles 2141:, and the second source is a self-published blog. 2346:Al Qaeda operative Rashid Rauf survived US strike 1942:Al Qaeda Operative Rashid Rauf survived US strike 1167:connection to that think tank and mentioned that 3000:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance 2945:C-Class North American military history articles 128:, a project which is currently considered to be 2955:C-Class United States military history articles 2509:You already opposed. You can't oppose twice. -- 2328: 1497:The problems in the article have been resolved. 1485: 2843:This message was posted before February 2018. 2733:This message was posted before February 2018. 1601:Iqinn, the article reflects its sources. The 1149:weight even if you don't like what they say.-- 8: 327:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 3020:C-Class Websites articles of Low-importance 2813:I have just modified one external link on 2551:I have just modified 12 external links on 1483:I re-added the POV tag as per our rules: 1002:Agree, the best would be to merge it into 760: 602: 513: 467:North American military history task force 437: 351: 264: 159: 88: 43:contentious material about living persons 2121:got it wrong or even mention the journal 703:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States 483:United States military history task force 973:may be an option rather than deletion.-- 307:This article is within the scope of the 1872:For example, Roggio titled one article 1369:? Remember, this article is about the 1177:specifically said that when discussing 762: 604: 515: 266: 161: 90: 60: 317:. To use this banner, please see the 227:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Journalism 3030:Unknown-importance Computing articles 2995:Low-importance United States articles 1143:Foundation for Defense of Democracies 1108:Foundation for Defense of Democracies 565:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Terrorism 330:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 1986:The following discussion is closed. 818:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Websites 656:This article is within the scope of 545:This article is within the scope of 207:This article is within the scope of 140:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Blogging 124:This article is within the scope of 2179:I concur with Cla68 and Hchc2009. 902:- it does neither at the moment. – 79:It is of interest to the following 3005:WikiProject United States articles 2930:Mid-importance Journalism articles 1350:. What is the problem with that? 706:Template:WikiProject United States 25: 2980:Low-importance Terrorism articles 2970:Post-Cold War task force articles 2940:C-Class military history articles 2817:. Please take a moment to review 2555:. Please take a moment to review 2463:Journal articles I sourced. The 2259:Journal articles I sourced. The 1163:I included a sentence mentioning 1056:. How about renaming it to that? 1052:Seems to be an article about the 3015:Low-importance Websites articles 2382:is reported to have been spotted 2320:The discussion above is closed. 2209: 2063:does not actually criticize the 2045:does not say anything about the 791: 764: 643: 633: 606: 538: 517: 414: 403: 392: 381: 370: 300: 268: 194: 184: 163: 117: 92: 61: 2935:WikiProject Journalism articles 2344:He also titled another article 1228:You did not address my points. 838:This article has been rated as 723:This article has been rated as 585:This article has been rated as 247:This article has been rated as 230:Template:WikiProject Journalism 2990:C-Class United States articles 2985:WikiProject Terrorism articles 2965:C-Class Post-Cold War articles 2538:23:09, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2519:19:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2504:19:20, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2478:17:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2457:16:39, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2438:16:26, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2416:16:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2401:15:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2316:19:04, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2299:18:57, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2274:17:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 2245:22:23, 16 September 2012 (UTC) 2049:being criticized for anything. 1963:RfC on "Controversies" section 568:Template:WikiProject Terrorism 1: 2358:and reports in September 2009 2231:00:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 860:This article is supported by 821:Template:WikiProject Websites 745:This article is supported by 559:and see a list of open tasks. 221:and see a list of open tasks. 143:Template:WikiProject Blogging 35:biographies of living persons 2373:is reported to have survived 1979:06:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 1821:piece is critical of Roggio 954:21:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 310:Military history WikiProject 2925:C-Class Journalism articles 2911:21:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC) 2205:19:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 2193:11:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 2175:08:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 2151:05:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 2009:04:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 1811:07:19, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 1793:12:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 1774:10:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 1735:16:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC) 1721:04:27, 19 August 2011 (UTC) 931:23:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 912:22:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 45:must be removed immediately 3056: 3025:C-Class Computing articles 2975:C-Class Terrorism articles 2874:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2810:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2764:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2548:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1958:14:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 1932:23:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 1914:22:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 1891:19:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 1603:Columbia Journalism Review 1375:Columbia Journalism Review 1006:. Public Multimedia fails 729:project's importance scale 591:project's importance scale 375:Referencing and citation: 253:project's importance scale 3010:C-Class Websites articles 2107:actually states that the 2034:doesn't even mention the 1706:22:34, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 1689:22:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 1674:08:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 1658:08:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC) 1644:13:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1627:12:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1597:12:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1579:04:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1564:12:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 1545:11:54, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 1531:07:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC) 1516:03:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 1459:03:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 1444:00:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 1430:16:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 1413:08:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 1391:06:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 1360:05:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 1342:05:24, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 1327:03:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 1294:05:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 1280:01:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC) 1266:17:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 1252:16:44, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 1238:15:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 1224:14:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 1209:10:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 1191:04:57, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 1159:02:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 1138:12:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 1123:09:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 1098:02:39, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 1080:12:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 1066:08:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 1047:07:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 859: 837: 786: 744: 722: 659:WikiProject United States 628: 584: 533: 497: 481: 465: 436: 333:military history articles 295: 246: 179: 112: 87: 2801:16:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 2322:Please do not modify it. 1988:Please do not modify it. 1922:for an outside opinion. 1863:22:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC) 1839:00:11, 6 June 2012 (UTC) 1197:senior fellow of the FDD 1020:05:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 998:02:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 983:02:03, 12 May 2011 (UTC) 898:and have references per 798:This article is part of 664:United States of America 499:Post-Cold War task force 2806:External links modified 2544:External links modified 2085:does not criticize the 1032:I have just completely 441:Associated task forces: 386:Coverage and accuracy: 3035:All Computing articles 1503: 856: 741: 709:United States articles 494: 478: 462: 419:Supporting materials: 347: 210:WikiProject Journalism 69:This article is rated 3040:All Websites articles 1972:Already done by Cla68 1845:Controversies section 863:WikiProject Computing 855: 740: 548:WikiProject Terrorism 493: 477: 461: 346: 73:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 18:Talk:Long War Journal 2855:regular verification 2745:regular verification 1762:The Long War Journal 1753:Huffington Post cite 1179:The Long War Journal 1054:The Long War Journal 971:The Long War Journal 801:WikiProject Websites 651:United States portal 126:WikiProject Blogging 2845:After February 2018 2735:After February 2018 2223:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff 677:Articles Requested! 408:Grammar and style: 361:for B-class status: 233:Journalism articles 2899:InternetArchiveBot 2850:InternetArchiveBot 2789:InternetArchiveBot 2740:InternetArchiveBot 1989: 1242:neither did you.-- 857: 742: 571:Terrorism articles 495: 479: 463: 348: 315:list of open tasks 75:content assessment 2875: 2765: 2488:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT 2283:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT 1987: 878: 877: 874: 873: 870: 869: 824:Websites articles 759: 758: 755: 754: 601: 600: 597: 596: 512: 511: 508: 507: 504: 503: 432: 431: 388:criterion not met 319:full instructions 263: 262: 259: 258: 202:Journalism portal 158: 157: 154: 153: 146:Blogging articles 55: 54: 16:(Redirected from 3047: 2909: 2900: 2873: 2872: 2851: 2815:Long War Journal 2799: 2790: 2763: 2762: 2741: 2722: 2648: 2574: 2553:Long War Journal 2536: 2534: 2529: 2502: 2500: 2495: 2465:synthesis policy 2436: 2434: 2429: 2339:has been spotted 2297: 2295: 2290: 2261:synthesis policy 2213: 2212: 2191: 2189: 2184: 2139:Long War Journal 2119:Long War Journal 2109:Long War Journal 2087:Long War Journal 2076:Long War Journal 2065:Long War Journal 2047:Long War Journal 2036:Long War Journal 1902:Long War Journal 1879:consensus policy 1487:When to remove: 1028:Notability issue 844:importance scale 826: 825: 822: 819: 816: 795: 788: 787: 782: 779: 768: 761: 711: 710: 707: 704: 701: 653: 648: 647: 646: 637: 630: 629: 624: 621: 619:Military history 610: 603: 573: 572: 569: 566: 563: 542: 535: 534: 529: 521: 514: 448: 438: 422: 418: 417: 411: 407: 406: 400: 396: 395: 389: 385: 384: 378: 374: 373: 352: 335: 334: 331: 328: 325: 324:Military history 304: 297: 296: 291: 276:Military history 272: 265: 235: 234: 231: 228: 225: 204: 199: 198: 197: 188: 181: 180: 175: 167: 160: 148: 147: 144: 141: 138: 121: 114: 113: 108: 96: 89: 72: 66: 65: 57: 49:this noticeboard 27: 21: 3055: 3054: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3046: 3045: 3044: 2915: 2914: 2903: 2898: 2866: 2859:have permission 2849: 2823:this simple FaQ 2808: 2793: 2788: 2756: 2749:have permission 2739: 2716: 2642: 2568: 2561:this simple FaQ 2546: 2532: 2527: 2525: 2498: 2493: 2491: 2432: 2427: 2425: 2331: 2326: 2325: 2293: 2288: 2286: 2210: 2187: 2182: 2180: 2021: 1992: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1965: 1870: 1847: 1825:he started the 1819:Huffington Post 1755: 1110: 1030: 966: 886: 884:Speedy deletion 823: 820: 817: 814: 813: 780: 774: 708: 705: 702: 699: 698: 697: 683:Become a Member 649: 644: 642: 622: 616: 570: 567: 564: 561: 560: 527: 446: 420: 415: 409: 404: 398: 393: 387: 382: 376: 371: 332: 329: 326: 323: 322: 278: 232: 229: 226: 223: 222: 200: 195: 193: 173: 145: 142: 139: 136: 135: 102: 70: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3053: 3051: 3043: 3042: 3037: 3032: 3027: 3022: 3017: 3012: 3007: 3002: 2997: 2992: 2987: 2982: 2977: 2972: 2967: 2962: 2957: 2952: 2947: 2942: 2937: 2932: 2927: 2917: 2916: 2893: 2892: 2885: 2838: 2837: 2829:Added archive 2807: 2804: 2783: 2782: 2775: 2728: 2727: 2713: 2705:Added archive 2703: 2695:Added archive 2693: 2685:Added archive 2683: 2675:Added archive 2673: 2665:Added archive 2663: 2655:Added archive 2653: 2639: 2631:Added archive 2629: 2621:Added archive 2619: 2611:Added archive 2609: 2601:Added archive 2599: 2591:Added archive 2589: 2581:Added archive 2579: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2507: 2506: 2460: 2459: 2441: 2440: 2330: 2327: 2319: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2207: 2195: 2177: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2130: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2079: 2068: 2057: 2050: 2039: 2020: 2017: 2016: 2015: 1993: 1984: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1946:fanpage policy 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1869: 1866: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1754: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1585: 1502: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1109: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1070:No objection. 1029: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 965: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 936: 935: 934: 933: 915: 914: 885: 882: 880: 876: 875: 872: 871: 868: 867: 858: 848: 847: 840:Low-importance 836: 830: 829: 827: 796: 784: 783: 781:Low‑importance 769: 757: 756: 753: 752: 743: 733: 732: 725:Low-importance 721: 715: 714: 712: 696: 695: 690: 685: 680: 673: 671:Template Usage 667: 655: 654: 638: 626: 625: 623:Low‑importance 611: 599: 598: 595: 594: 587:Low-importance 583: 577: 576: 574: 543: 531: 530: 528:Low‑importance 522: 510: 509: 506: 505: 502: 501: 496: 486: 485: 480: 470: 469: 464: 454: 453: 451: 449: 443: 442: 434: 433: 430: 429: 427: 425: 424: 423: 412: 401: 390: 379: 365: 364: 362: 349: 339: 338: 336: 305: 293: 292: 273: 261: 260: 257: 256: 249:Mid-importance 245: 239: 238: 236: 219:the discussion 206: 205: 189: 177: 176: 174:Mid‑importance 168: 156: 155: 152: 151: 149: 122: 110: 109: 97: 85: 84: 78: 67: 53: 52: 41:poorly sourced 30: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3052: 3041: 3038: 3036: 3033: 3031: 3028: 3026: 3023: 3021: 3018: 3016: 3013: 3011: 3008: 3006: 3003: 3001: 2998: 2996: 2993: 2991: 2988: 2986: 2983: 2981: 2978: 2976: 2973: 2971: 2968: 2966: 2963: 2961: 2958: 2956: 2953: 2951: 2948: 2946: 2943: 2941: 2938: 2936: 2933: 2931: 2928: 2926: 2923: 2922: 2920: 2913: 2912: 2907: 2902: 2901: 2890: 2886: 2883: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2870: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2846: 2841: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2811: 2805: 2803: 2802: 2797: 2792: 2791: 2780: 2776: 2773: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2760: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2736: 2731: 2726: 2720: 2714: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2652: 2646: 2640: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2578: 2572: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2549: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2530: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2505: 2501: 2496: 2489: 2485: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2466: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2443: 2442: 2439: 2435: 2430: 2423: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2403: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2374: 2370: 2365: 2363: 2361:and July 2010 2360: 2357: 2354: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2340: 2336: 2323: 2318: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2300: 2296: 2291: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2262: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2208: 2206: 2203: 2200: 2196: 2194: 2190: 2185: 2178: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2134: 2131: 2129: 2127: 2125: 2123: 2120: 2116: 2110: 2106: 2104: 2101: 2099: 2096: 2095: 2093: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2055: 2051: 2048: 2044: 2043:second source 2040: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2028: 2026: 2025: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1997:controversies 1991: 1980: 1977: 1973: 1962: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1875: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1758: 1752: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1499: 1496: 1493: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1481: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1315: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1107: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1035: 1027: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 1000: 999: 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 984: 980: 976: 972: 963: 955: 951: 947: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 932: 928: 924: 919: 918: 917: 916: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 892: 891: 890: 883: 881: 865: 864: 854: 850: 849: 845: 841: 835: 832: 831: 828: 811: 807: 803: 802: 797: 794: 790: 789: 785: 778: 773: 770: 767: 763: 750: 749: 739: 735: 734: 730: 726: 720: 717: 716: 713: 700:United States 694: 691: 689: 686: 684: 681: 679: 678: 674: 672: 669: 668: 665: 661: 660: 652: 641: 639: 636: 632: 631: 627: 620: 615: 614:United States 612: 609: 605: 592: 588: 582: 579: 578: 575: 558: 554: 550: 549: 544: 541: 537: 536: 532: 526: 523: 520: 516: 500: 492: 488: 487: 484: 476: 472: 471: 468: 460: 456: 455: 452: 450: 445: 444: 439: 435: 428: 426: 421:criterion met 413: 410:criterion met 402: 399:criterion met 391: 380: 377:criterion met 369: 368: 367: 366: 363: 360: 359: 353: 350: 345: 341: 340: 337: 320: 316: 312: 311: 306: 303: 299: 298: 294: 290: 289:Post-Cold War 286: 285:United States 282: 281:North America 277: 274: 271: 267: 254: 250: 244: 241: 240: 237: 220: 216: 212: 211: 203: 192: 190: 187: 183: 182: 178: 172: 169: 166: 162: 150: 133: 132: 127: 123: 120: 116: 115: 111: 106: 101: 98: 95: 91: 86: 82: 76: 68: 64: 59: 58: 50: 46: 42: 37: 36: 31: 29: 28: 19: 2897: 2894: 2869:source check 2848: 2842: 2839: 2812: 2809: 2787: 2784: 2759:source check 2738: 2732: 2729: 2550: 2547: 2508: 2483: 2470:75.72.35.253 2461: 2449:75.72.35.253 2444: 2421: 2404: 2393:75.72.35.253 2381: 2377: 2372: 2368: 2366: 2349: 2345: 2338: 2334: 2332: 2321: 2308:75.72.35.253 2303: 2302: 2278: 2277: 2266:75.72.35.253 2257: 2214: 2138: 2137:mention the 2118: 2108: 2086: 2083:final source 2075: 2064: 2054:third source 2046: 2035: 2032:first source 1994: 1985: 1950:75.72.35.253 1941: 1938: 1901: 1883:75.72.35.253 1873: 1871: 1848: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1781:Stephen Kaus 1761: 1756: 1727:Wikireader41 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1552:WP:OWNERSHIP 1504: 1486: 1482: 1479: 1451:Wikireader41 1449:arguments.-- 1422:Wikireader41 1401:one of FDD’s 1400: 1396: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1272:Wikireader41 1244:Wikireader41 1216:Wikireader41 1178: 1174: 1168: 1164: 1151:Wikireader41 1111: 1090:Wikireader41 1031: 970: 967: 964:deletion tag 887: 879: 861: 839: 810:project page 799: 746: 724: 688:Project Talk 676: 657: 586: 546: 356: 308: 248: 208: 129: 81:WikiProjects 44: 33: 2103:(dead link) 2072:next source 2061:next source 1995:Should the 1086:Bill Roggio 1004:Bill Roggio 397:Structure: 2919:Categories 2906:Report bug 2796:Report bug 2199:Buckshot06 1799:I fixed it 1696:ask them. 1611:The Nation 1175:The Nation 1170:The Nation 946:Salmanazar 557:discussion 224:Journalism 215:journalism 171:Journalism 32:While the 2889:this tool 2882:this tool 2779:this tool 2772:this tool 2719:dead link 2645:dead link 2571:dead link 2528:GregJackP 2494:GregJackP 2428:GregJackP 2289:GregJackP 2183:GregJackP 2112:sources." 777:Computing 562:Terrorism 553:terrorism 525:Terrorism 2895:Cheers.— 2785:Cheers.— 2167:Hchc2009 2019:Comments 1976:Armbrust 1898:restored 1397:of FDD’s 923:Metatree 815:Websites 806:websites 772:Websites 358:criteria 137:Blogging 131:inactive 105:inactive 100:Blogging 2819:my edit 2723:tag to 2649:tag to 2575:tag to 2557:my edit 2533:Boomer! 2511:Sknmak1 2499:Boomer! 2445:Support 2433:Boomer! 2408:Sknmak1 2304:Support 2294:Boomer! 2219:WP:SNOW 2188:Boomer! 1918:I have 1420:tags.-- 1034:rebuilt 904:ukexpat 896:WP:CORP 842:on the 727:on the 589:on the 251:on the 71:C-class 2715:Added 2641:Added 2567:Added 2484:Oppose 2422:Oppose 2385:killed 2279:Oppose 2202:(talk) 1851:WP:SYN 1823:before 1165:TLWJ's 1147:WP:DUE 1008:WP:GNG 990:Icerat 975:Icerat 693:Alerts 77:scale. 2237:Cla68 2215:Agree 2143:Cla68 2001:Cla68 1924:Cla68 1920:asked 1906:Cla68 1855:Cla68 1831:Cla68 1803:Cla68 1785:IQinn 1766:Cla68 1713:Cla68 1698:IQinn 1681:Cla68 1666:IQinn 1650:Cla68 1636:IQinn 1619:Cla68 1589:IQinn 1571:Cla68 1556:IQinn 1537:Cla68 1523:IQinn 1508:IQinn 1436:IQinn 1405:IQinn 1383:Cla68 1352:IQinn 1334:Cla68 1319:Cla68 1286:IQinn 1258:IQinn 1230:IQinn 1201:IQinn 1183:Cla68 1130:Cla68 1115:IQinn 1072:Cla68 1058:IQinn 1039:Cla68 1012:IQinn 900:WP:RS 2515:talk 2474:talk 2453:talk 2412:talk 2397:talk 2312:talk 2270:talk 2241:talk 2227:talk 2221:. — 2171:talk 2147:talk 2081:The 2070:The 2059:The 2052:The 2041:The 2030:The 2005:talk 1954:talk 1928:talk 1910:talk 1887:talk 1859:talk 1835:talk 1817:The 1807:talk 1789:talk 1770:talk 1731:talk 1717:talk 1702:talk 1685:talk 1670:talk 1654:talk 1640:talk 1623:talk 1593:talk 1575:talk 1560:talk 1541:talk 1527:talk 1512:talk 1455:talk 1440:talk 1426:talk 1409:talk 1387:talk 1356:talk 1338:talk 1323:talk 1290:talk 1276:talk 1262:talk 1248:talk 1234:talk 1220:talk 1205:talk 1187:talk 1155:talk 1134:talk 1119:talk 1094:talk 1076:talk 1062:talk 1043:talk 1016:talk 994:talk 979:talk 950:talk 927:talk 908:talk 2863:RfC 2833:to 2753:RfC 2709:to 2699:to 2689:to 2679:to 2669:to 2659:to 2635:to 2625:to 2615:to 2605:to 2595:to 2585:to 2285:. 1827:LWJ 1615:LWJ 1607:LWJ 1379:LWJ 1371:LWJ 1367:LWJ 834:Low 719:Low 581:Low 243:Mid 2921:: 2876:. 2871:}} 2867:{{ 2766:. 2761:}} 2757:{{ 2721:}} 2717:{{ 2647:}} 2643:{{ 2573:}} 2569:{{ 2517:) 2490:. 2476:) 2455:) 2414:) 2399:) 2314:) 2272:) 2243:) 2229:) 2173:) 2149:) 2007:) 1974:. 1956:) 1930:) 1912:) 1889:) 1861:) 1837:) 1809:) 1801:. 1791:) 1772:) 1733:) 1719:) 1704:) 1687:) 1672:) 1656:) 1642:) 1625:) 1617:? 1595:) 1577:) 1562:) 1543:) 1529:) 1514:) 1457:) 1442:) 1428:) 1411:) 1389:) 1381:. 1358:) 1340:) 1325:) 1292:) 1278:) 1264:) 1250:) 1236:) 1222:) 1207:) 1189:) 1181:. 1157:) 1136:) 1121:) 1096:) 1078:) 1064:) 1045:) 1018:) 1010:. 996:) 981:) 952:) 929:) 910:) 775:: 617:: 447:/ 287:/ 283:/ 279:: 2908:) 2904:( 2891:. 2884:. 2798:) 2794:( 2781:. 2774:. 2513:( 2472:( 2451:( 2410:( 2395:( 2310:( 2268:( 2239:( 2225:( 2169:( 2145:( 2089:. 2067:. 2038:. 2003:( 1952:( 1926:( 1908:( 1885:( 1881:. 1857:( 1833:( 1805:( 1787:( 1768:( 1729:( 1715:( 1700:( 1683:( 1668:( 1652:( 1638:( 1621:( 1591:( 1573:( 1558:( 1539:( 1525:( 1510:( 1453:( 1438:( 1424:( 1407:( 1385:( 1354:( 1336:( 1321:( 1288:( 1274:( 1260:( 1246:( 1232:( 1218:( 1203:( 1185:( 1153:( 1132:( 1117:( 1092:( 1074:( 1060:( 1041:( 1014:( 992:( 977:( 948:( 925:( 906:( 866:. 846:. 812:. 751:. 731:. 593:. 321:. 255:. 134:. 107:) 103:( 83:: 51:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index