Knowledge

Talk:Loop bin duplicator

Source 📝

171:
duplicator, which is completely electronic (functioning much like the high-speed dubbing feature of a dual cassette deck, but much more sophisticated), and yields much better-sounding duplicated cassettes. This is the method that most of the major record labels use for duplicating albums onto the cassette. As far as using a wider tape, this is due to being that the wider the tape is, the better the reproduced sound will be from it. And with duplicating to a small 1/8" size tape like that used by cassettes, the audio quality needs to be quite high in order to utilize the maximum quality 1/8" tape can provide.
22: 74: 53: 159:
2. Why use a 1/2" or 1" source tape when the destination is only 1/8"? Surely it would be much more productive to copy onto wider tape, then slit it down to 1/8" individual tapes, thus recording 4 or 8 cassettes at once. Is that ever done? I can imagine in this case that track alignment would be very
144:
1. my understanding was that the signal was transferred by actually running the source tape in physical contact with the blank through a transfer head which carried a very weak bias signal which copied the signal across. The article currently doesn't mention this, and the assumption would be that the
170:
Yes, cassette tapes are also duplicated in the method you mentioned by having the tape in contact with the source tape and passing a weak bias signal through the two layers of tape, however, this method of cassette duplication is of a much lower quality than the method employing a loop bin
160:
critical, but it's going to be anyway since the 4 tracks on the destination cassette must be precisely positioned. I don't see what the benefit of the wider source tape is if the destination is already narrow.
149:
As far as I know, this method is only used for video tape duplication since there is only once side to a video tape. Audio cassettes have an A and B side and copying them as you describe would be impossible.
182:
I've updated this article with a little more detail on how it works. I was the chief software engineer for Duplitronics, the company that held the patent for digital bins before it was found invalid.
206: 124: 114: 211: 201: 90: 81: 58: 86: 33: 21: 39: 183: 150: 172: 89:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
195: 161: 186: 175: 164: 153: 145:
signals are transferred electronically (which may also be the case I guess).
73: 52: 15: 207:
Low-importance Professional sound production articles
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 99:
Knowledge:WikiProject Professional sound production
212:WikiProject Professional sound production articles 202:Start-Class Professional sound production articles 102:Template:WikiProject Professional sound production 8: 19: 47: 82:WikiProject Professional sound production 49: 105:Professional sound production articles 7: 79:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 87:sound recording and reproduction 72: 51: 20: 119:This article has been rated as 1: 176:20:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 165:05:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC) 96:Professional sound production 93:and see a list of open tasks. 59:Professional sound production 187:22:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 154:22:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 228: 125:project's importance scale 118: 67: 46: 141:I have two questions: 28:This article is rated 34:content assessment 139: 138: 135: 134: 131: 130: 219: 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 227: 226: 222: 221: 220: 218: 217: 216: 192: 191: 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 225: 223: 215: 214: 209: 204: 194: 193: 190: 189: 179: 178: 173:misternuvistor 157: 156: 137: 136: 133: 132: 129: 128: 121:Low-importance 117: 111: 110: 108: 91:the discussion 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 224: 213: 210: 208: 205: 203: 200: 199: 197: 188: 185: 181: 180: 177: 174: 169: 168: 167: 166: 163: 155: 152: 148: 147: 146: 142: 126: 122: 116: 113: 112: 109: 92: 88: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 158: 143: 140: 120: 80: 40:WikiProjects 30:Start-class 196:Categories 184:Jimberg98 151:Jimberg98 123:on the 162:Graham 36:scale. 115:Low 198:: 127:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Professional sound production
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Professional sound production
sound recording and reproduction
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Jimberg98
22:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Graham
05:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
misternuvistor
20:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Jimberg98
22:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Categories
Start-Class Professional sound production articles
Low-importance Professional sound production articles
WikiProject Professional sound production articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.