Talk:Lori Greiner - Knowledge

1726:

years. You're unfortunately dependent on the text the hatnote template generates, but neither of them are major contributors. Perhaps something saying undisclosed paid editing might be more appropriate, or you could flag their names on the talk page. The citation style is fine - that hatnote shouldn't be there. Ref expand would only make sense if there was a lot of unsourced info. There's only one unsourced sentence - you'd be hard pressed to find a single decent article without a citation missing, so I think we can agree that that one is also unnecessary. As far as unreliable sources, I agree that since the Forbes article was written by a paid outside contributor, as I see quite a bit, it's not as reliable as a staff article, but the source was used to simply say she was on Shark Tank. That's her main claim to fame, and really doesn't really require sourcing anyway. The Forbes site strangely slowly blanks itself out and says it's no longer available, so I marked it as a dead link. With the other sources, if they aren't listed on the

2640:- I'm finally getting around to reading this info after getting pinged on my talk page. Thanks for putting down your thoughts and explanation of why you removed the info. I see the Parade source as a bit more reliable than you do. Yes, it's hard to source patent claims since they are sometimes filed under business names, and if it's hundreds, it's hard to count the results of most patent searches. But the info is reported in an independent source, and that's our standard. If it's 500 and they mistyped 600, then there's no reason we can't just say "reportedly more than 500". If she's famous for being an inventor, then the patent count is certainly lead-worthy material. The Inc staff moniker on the video is troubling - I like to see an actual reporter's name. And the ABC page looks like her supplied bio, so it should only be used for uncontroversial items. So we agree on most but not everything. 330: 309: 1631:- Editor assistance page stalker here. I think we disagree about the numerous hatnotes on this article. I cleaned up the article and cleared them, but you put them back. Rather than revert, per common courtesy I'm starting this discussion so you as the tagger can defend them. For example, the citations look fine to me. Almost every statement is sourced. The sources all appear reliable - do you know of any that have been flagged on the reliable sources noticeboard? I see potential COI editing history with the SPA accounts, but nothing recently. The talk pages says that 793: 1857:. It is commonly said (though I cannot confirm through independent research) that her parents divorced when she was nine years old. It is exceedingly unlikely that her parents would have even been, you know, "her parents" if they officially divorced nine months prior to December 1969 (her stated month and year of birth both here and on many unreputable sites online) and it is impossible for them to have divorced when she was nine years old when the given divorce was nine months prior to her being born at all. 2104:

decency to discuss it first. If I could, I would've removed a lot more crap from this damn article, but then there'd be practically nothing left. But, hey, everyone knows you love proclaiming yourself the boss of every article you edit, so deal with this nightmare of an article yourself. Wipe out the whole damn article for all I care. You're going to do whatever the hell you want anyway, like you do all over this encylopedia. It's a-holes like you that drive so many good editors away from this project.

227: 209: 237: 1888:

she attended and graduated from Loyola University, for instance, and I also cannot confirm the month and day of the year she was born on (her book does not give her birth year, by the way) - but December of 1969 simply doesn't make sense for the reasons explained and linked to above. If there is conclusive evidence to the contrary, by all means, revert back to 12/9/1969. But my reasoning is explained here to the fullest detail I can give.

402: 1133:, you have really been kind in guiding me. I checked and re-checked all the references and each of them have dates. Besides, you can remove the close connection tag as I have disclosed my paid contribution and have removed promotional content. Further, I have corrected the citation style and have completed all references, and request those tags to be removed as well. Your help will be appreciated. Thanks! 119: 95: 64: 1303: 755: 181: 1865:"It was 2008 when I got the call to come in and meet with Mark Burnett for a new show that he, ABC, and Sony were developing, called Shark Tank. The meeting went great and I was so excited to be chosen for the show. But then the most horrible thing happened: my mother, whom I loved very much, died suddenly right at the same time as shooting, and I had to withdraw." 912: 2197:

all those months went by and started reverting without discussing your concerns first. So, like I said, wipe out all the content if that's what you want to do. You don't give a fuck about what anyone says to you anyway. Why don't you nominate yourself for adminship. I dare you. It would be one of the most entertaining RfA's in the history of this project.

1988: 129: 3285:

from the lead (Parade, Crain's, Philadelphia Inquirer). I will not object to removing the other two from the lead (EW, NY Times) if do you not object to me relocating them for now to the corresponding content in the body. Then, they can be discussed along with the current two attached to that content

2666:

Is she famous for being an inventor? Are there any sources that indicate so that are not influenced by the Shark Tank public relations campaign? The Crains ref, likely, but I don't have access to it. The Philadelphia Inquirer ref doesn't call her "inventor", but has some nice context. The Twin Cities

2196:

identified in this thread. You claim now, 9 months later, that those were just "some" of the bad ones. Well, that's your problem. You should've named the others while you were positng that list. And if you didn't have time to deal with it, as you stated, then you shouldn't have strolled in here after

3628:

Okay I know this won't be considered a reliable source, but I thought I'd point it out. On page 172 of the 1979 Loyola Chicago University yearbook, there's a picture of the Alpha Kappa Phi fraternity and she's listed among the names. This was before she got married so her last name was Husman at the

3229:

I've handed you a huge compromise and easy resolution on a silver platter, yet you continue to argue and complain instead of simply saying yes or no to the offer. Perhaps you are unsure if you'll be able to work cooperatively and productively with TimTempleton to reach a satisfying resolution to all

2960:

I'll make a deal. If you propose the exact changes you'd like to make to the article, and number each of them (e.g. Proposal 1, Proposal 2, etc.), I will support any to which TimTempleton agrees. Of course, you two may negotiate changes to your proposals so that both sides will be satisfied. My only

2191:

Don't fucking misrepresent my edits. Anyone can look at all of them, and their corresponding edit summaries, to see exactly what I did to try and reduce the mess. If there were any poor refs left in the article after I finished the cleanup, I wasn't the one who added them; they were already there. I

1887:

Certainly, I can understand that she could pass for 50. I assume she does what she can to stay in good physical condition. But the circumstantial evidence I see online suggests to me it's much more likely she was born in 1960 as opposed to 1969. There are details I cannot confirm - I cannot see when

3389:

and Squatty Potty are among the most noteworthy/successful of Greiner's Shark Tank investments. Further, I've repeatedly read in solid sources that Scrub Daddy was, and I suppose still is, among the most financially successful products in Shark Tank history. And Squatty Potty is probably very close

3342:

That products list was the next area I wanted to address, hoping it would be an acceptable area to work on that wasn't related to the other disputes. I was going to look for new references that might suggest mention of one or more might be due, but I wasn't expecting to find them. This is promising

3280:

I'm sure you're aware of all of the past issues and discussions regarding the MoS protocols for sources in the lead of an article. Refs are not prohibited from any lead, nor are they required. There is also no exception to ref requirments with regard to the lead. They should be avoided in the lead,

2103:

what you suggested (the 4 refs) on January 1, nearly 9 months ago. I spent all that time cleaning up this huge mess of an article because you said you didn't have time to deal with it. I left what is sourced beyond the ones I removed. Now, you swoop in and fuck with my edits without even having the

3373:

Regarding the two remaining sources in the lead, I just discovered the E News one has advertisements for Greiner's products below the article itself. It even has a disclaimer at the bottom of the page that says, "We love these products, and we hope you do too. E! has affiliate relationships, so we

3118:

Please don't look a gift horse in the mouth. You have an amazing opportunity to resolve all your objections with TimTemplteon, assuming he agrees to work with you. With me out of the picture in the discussions between the two of you, I don't see why it can't be settled quickly. Your choice, but my

3053:

As my offer makes abundantly clear, that's between you and TimTempleton. It has nothing to do with me since I will not be involved in the negotiation of your proposed changes. Obviously, each change can only be made if both of you agree to it. You've hit the lottery with my offer of compromise, so

2069:

I've removed and replaced the crap sources that were templated at the top of the article: Advisors, Success, Bustle, and Seeking Alpha. I also rewrote any content that included claims not verified by either the old or new refs. Hopefully, there weren't won't be any more problems with COI editing.

770:

Tag removal request - I request you to please remove the ADVERT maintenance tag at the top of the page as I have edited the copy and have removed the promotional content that made the copy read like an advertisement. The page now has only factual content following WP:CCPOL guidelines. Thank you.

3428:

I've done all I can to clean up this article, while trying to maintain a fair balance based on reliable sources. From this point on, I'll leave it to you to take care of of completing whatever changes you feel are necessary to make this a quality article. I have no objections to you reverting or

3413:

As I'm sure you've seen, I also did some basic copy editing and rewrites, and moved around some of the existing content for more logical placement and flow to prevent reader confusion or objections. There are several edits because I was tweaking the layout as I went along. I was tempted to start

2736:

Timtempleton made his position very clear, concluding that "there's no question that she's an inventor." So, pretending that he agrees with you doesn't make it so. Trying to whitewash all mentions of her being an inventor is not only inappropriate and wrong, but diminishes the credibility of the

3398:

bought Bantam Bagels, which is sourced in the Greiner article. But moving on from what is really OR, I am perfectly fine with you trimming that list of products and leaving only the ones you feel are worthy of inclusion in an encylopedia. That paragraph, with all the products, is the one in the

1725:

Based on the ANI link, I agree that Philpallen is likely COI but in reviewing his four contributions to the article over the past year, they are minor - a source is swapped, and Greiner's birthday was changed. The article has been winnowed down since then. Dtrebbien hasn't edited this in seven

902:

I have fixed the references so please request you to remove the tags about unclear citation style and incomplete citations. Also, the listed sources are notable including Forbes, NY Times, Crain's Chicago Business, The Philadelphia Inquirer, Business Insider, CNBC, Entreprenuer, Seeking Alpha,

1354:

etc. which are enough to establish notability. Also, after the changes as per the talk page history, the article reads factual. I would appreciate if you could look into this, have also left a message on your talk page. I am making this paid request on behalf of Lori Greiner. Thanks.

3317:

As I said, I can relocate the remaining two to the body temporarily. But that would leave four refs for the content about Greiner's QVC show, which is too many. It would need to be decided which of the four refs should remain to verify that content. So, do you want me to move

2722:. Judging by the refs, her work at QVC and Shark Tank are what she's famous for. It's her television work that should be first and foremost. Her entrepreneurial background second, and highly intertwined with her QVC show. From that perspective, I think the lede is fine. -- 1424:- I have just checked all the citations today and have formatted all of them as per last1=|first1=|title=|url=|website=|date=|accessdate=. They follow the same citation style and are consistent for verification. Further, with the references having reliable sources such as 1189:

The article will take considerable time to review, because it's clear that it's the work of undeclared paid editors. I'm not sure what you can do to help hasten this. It would help if you could identify all accounts that you used or know were working with a similar COI.

2670:

If we look for reference not influenced by her QVC show or Shark Tank, then I believe we have nothing at all. Because of that, I think we have the first sentence of the lede correct, and I'm leaning to agreeing with the recent removal of "inventor" from the infobox.

2128:

of the problematic references to point out that the references have not been reviewed carefully. Substituting them with references that were previously identified as poor isn't a solution. We're not playing whack-a-mole with poor references, especially not in a BLP.

2828:

Timtempleton has told you (again), as politely as he can, that you are wrong. You have no one agreeing with you. The content is sourced and is an obviously significant accomplishment, so do not continually restore without consensus. Also, please educate yourself on

2257:

Worry about your own behavior. Apparently, someone needs to teach you the meaning of deescalation. Let's start with this: I've made my points and you've made yours. So if you really want to deescalate, stop talking to me. Let's see if you're capable of doing that.

811:— in order to find out from them if it can be removed. Since they placed the template, they are in the best position to know whether or not the issues which caused its placement have been corrected. You may contact them by placing a new message on their 1321:

I am requesting you to please remove the tags on this page. All citations have been completed by a previous editor while the unclear citation style has also been taken care of. The article's list sources do show notable and reliable names such as

1730:, the RS hatnote shouldn't be there. If you disagree, you can start a discussion over there to get any suspect publications removed. In conclusion, this is overly hatnoted, which as you know is only going to discourage others from editing this. 1172:, I have made the changes. In all of the references, access date was already mentioned and in most of them accessdate and date is the same. Nonetheless, I have added the dates as suggested. I would appreciate if you could remove the tags. Thanks 3212:

see tp, consensus still needed for these issues, content prose prev addressed and edited with regard to tag(s)/promotion, content that is potentially contentious or likely to be challenged s/b sourced even in lead and/or have multiple refs to

1955:

Can you provide an actionable item to do before removing the COI template? I looked over the article and wasn't able to find anything. But if the template is justified, then there must be something that should be done or addressed. Thank you,

2795:

I don't want to be pulled into a simmering dispute, but I will comment that the whole point of Knowledge is to let readers know things they may not know, such as things people did but are not well known for. We are trying to educate people.

2656:

Thanks. As I said, what broader context there is in the reliable references is what we should include. Throwing numbers out to impress is what the promoters do, which is why we're in this situation. We're not here to let them make this their

2616:

I'm also concerned that her number of inventions has little context in these references, which we're not currently presenting at all. I think the article would be better off with that context rather than a rather meaningless, large number.

1635:

may have a conflict of interest, but he (or she?) only filled in the bare refs. Since everything is properly sourced and isn't promotional, the hatnotes may not be necessary. Thanks for you help keeping the encyclopedia in great shape.

2745:; is it a significant part of her life and her life's work. For the record, an endless number of notable people (with Knowledge articles) are not famous at all. Please educate yourself on the difference between notability and fame. Per 2575:

The third reference, from Parade, published before she partnered with AMG/Parade, is a puff piece. While I'm not against it's use completely, I think we should take care how it's being used so not to violate PROMO, NOTNEWS, and NPOV.

1860:

Well, how would I know that the person in the link is her mother, by chance? I suppose I cannot confirm 100%, but circumstantial evidence points to it. Ms. Husman died in November 2008. In Mrs. Greiner's book, she writes:

3054:

your continued debate on the matter is utterly perplexing. If you don't think you can work with Tim, then say no and we'll go from there. Otherwise, let him know it's a yes and get on the road to happiness for everyone.

3670: 3321:

Also, in the Career section, I think that long list of all the Shark Tank products she invested in is ridiculous and should therefore be trimmed. I feel that only the few noteworthy ones should remain. Do you agree?

3197:"No apparent reason"... other than the detailed edit summary provided and all prior talk page discussion. Let us know if you accept the above offer to work with TimTempleton, which will resolve all disputed content. 1658:

The article is too much the work of SPA accounts, and others that seem likely to have a COI (or at least they've simply echoed the public relations for Greiner). Of the top contributors to this article, any coi of

2883:

focus on content, so perhaps you didn't read them carefully. Both Timtempleton and I have told you the same thing regarding Greiner as an inventor. If you want the changes you seek, simply get a proper consensus.

2965:(3) any subsequent changes by you to the agreed upon edits will be reverted unless there is a new agreement as outlined above. I believe my offer could result in a very quick resolution to this ongoing dispute. 3568:

Hi, I'm not too sure if this will be considered a reliable source by Knowledge standards, but on the Loyola Chicago University Twitter page, it has listed her as being an alumni and having received her BA in

1597: 2870:

I'm sure you see the total hypocrisy in that statement, which of course completely violated FOC. Invoking policies, then not following them yourself is disruptive to the process of improving aritcles. As

3665: 2451:

Greiner has patented consumer products in other categories such as cosmetic organization, jewelry storage, travel, electronics, and household items. Greiner has invented over 500 products and holds 120

3281:

but there are circumstances where they're necessary, particularly when content is challenged or likely to be challenged. There is a long history regarding the refs in question. In any case, I have

2585:

The differences in reporting about her patents makes it difficult to determine what, if anything we should include. It certainly can be fact-checked, so I'm hoping we can find a way to mention it.

3725: 3339:

I was hoping the references could be used elsewhere or expansion. I don't want to lose them (unless there's clearly some reason to do so). I'd appreciate if you'd move them where you would like.

2428:

To prevent further edit-warring, I'm copying the disputed information here for discussion. It should be removed from the article until we can find consensus, as BLP requires, and as enforced by

903:

Bustle.com etc. I request you to please remove the reliable sources tag also. Further, I am not connected to Lori Greiner but am paid by Phil Phallen to make these edits. Here is the disclosure

3068:

I'm afraid you're not making any sense. I asked a simple question that I find essential in going forward with any agreement with you. I'll assume the answer is "no" until you make it clear. --

2961:

conditions for this compromise are (1) that there must be a clear agreement between the two of you as to exactly what the change(s) will be, (2) TimTempleton will make the agreed upon edits,

2781:

No one is trying to whitewash anything. Please retract. Misrepresenting and attacking others is not the way to create consensus, as you should have learned from your most recent block. --

3182:: I provided a brief explanation for each of my five edits there, and none are related to the disputes above. Please explain, citing relevant policies, why none have been retained. -- 1076:- I have checked and added publication date and author is each reference. You may review my latest edit. Please let me know if this is fine and request you to remove the tags. Thanks! 1792:

in November 2018, but since then the article is substantially changed to tone down the advertisement-like matter. Further, the tag for complete citation can also be removed as per

1407:

Please add the following line in the second paragraph of 'Shark Tank' section - As of May 2019, Greiner’s Shark Tank investments have made more than $ 870 million in retail sales.

1869:

The timeline fits. Shark Tank officially debuted on August 9, 2009. It's not impossible to suggest that the filming process for the show had begun several months prior to that.

862:

Even with the confusion of the references, there are poor and promotional references being used for material in the lede. That's enough from my perspective to leave the tag in.

859:

There are references without basic information, and the references are not using the same format throughout. This makes the article difficult to review and needs to be fixed.

43: 1925:

I didn't think I was using any information that wasn't readily accessible online - all of this can be found through basic Google searches - but I will redact as necessary.

3715: 3705: 3675: 380: 370: 2875:

clearly states, "Focus on article content during discussions, not on editor conduct; comment on content, not the contributor." But you know that. And does your prior

1410:

Please add the following line in 'Publications' section - In March 2019, she launched her first magazine Living Inspired, published in partnership with AMG/Parade.

3710: 3700: 2696: 2505: 2229:

of "deescalate". Classic troll behavior. Please, run for administrator. Now, continue your long history of always having to get in the last word with editors. Go.

1784:- Thank you for the clarification and advise, Timtempleton. I agree with you that the article is not promotional any more. It may have been when it was tagged by 2980:

Glad to hear you're willing to defer to others. That's progress. Will you defer to policy, or do we need intermediaries to interpret and decide on the policy? --

2582:

I'm not sure how any number of "inventions" could be fact-checked, so we problably shouldn't use Knowledge's voice, if we mention any number or estimate at all.

2041:

as you seem to know more about what are considered high-quality sources. Replaced the template as the existing one did not correspond to the complaint at hand.

3632:

This makes the 1960 birth year seem more accurate because unless she's some sort of child prodigy, it's unlikely she was already in college at 9-10 years old.

3374:

may get a small share of the revenue from your purchases". I hadn't caught that previously. When I see refs like that, I think advertisement, not news. So, I

1485:

The Country Living ref is better, though I wouldn't argue it's high-quality. They're likely just passing on material provided to them by Greiner's publicists.

3690: 3655: 346: 285: 48: 190: 105: 31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 2579:

The three references do not verify the information. Each has a different number of "inventions", and the details about the patents isn't the same either.

719:

it should be in prose format, not as a list. Please feel free to re-add this content piece by piece, in prose format, as sources are located. Thank you.--

3382:

the NY Times ref from the lead to an unsourced sentence in the body, where I also added a mention of her nickname since it was only included in the lead.

3303:

I'm not asking for removal of sources from the article. I relocated them before, so I don't understand the problem or why such discussions are needed. --

1655:

The Forbes ref is unreliable and promotional. It's use, and the use of references like it, is rather typical of the problems we've had with this article.

1796:, the citations are complete enough to verify the content of the page. It only seems fair to remove the hatnotes given the changes done on the page. 1039:- I re-checked the references, but can't find the incomplete ones. Could you please guide me with specifics so that I can rectify them? Thanks a lot. 291: 3680: 3660: 1652:

The article needs a rewrite from the high-quality sources that BLP requires, with a careful eye to avoid echoing the public relations for Greiner.

337: 314: 147: 23: 1850:

The date of birth commonly see online suggests Mrs. Greiner was born in 1969, but there are conflicting reasons for why this doesn't make sense.

2879:

on an editor's prior block focus on content, or on editor conduct? You know that, too. Any editor can see for themselves that my comments above

2753:

depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines".

1727: 1212:. I have no idea about other accounts but I have disclosed my paid contribution. Hope that helps. Looking forward to get this issue resolved. 3695: 3685: 1522: 3720: 946: 561: 522: 151: 2847:

FOC means not commenting on editors as you are doing, rather focus on policies and references, which you are not doing, but you know that

1571: 1213: 1173: 1134: 1099: 1077: 1040: 999: 958: 818:

In the unlikely event that you do not hear back from them after a reasonable amount of time, please reopen this request by altering the

772: 500: 2804: 2711: 2648: 1829: 1738: 1644: 1404:

Please add the following sentence in the first paragraph of the page - She has invented over 500 products and holds over 120 patents.

155: 3586:

I'd assume that would be considered a primary source, if the identity of the twitter account is verifiable. Maybe we should check at

2085:

Unfortunately, we have little beyond "crap sources". There is a sizeable marketing campaign behind her. We're not here to echo it. --

3385:

As far as the way-too-long list of Shark Tank products... from reading a lot of high-quality sources over the years, I believe that

2225:

Anyone can look at my edits and see that you're completely full of shit, as always. "Please take some time to cool off" and then an

146:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1701: 1684: 579: 484: 468: 436: 1456:

etc. and you saying that you see no notability issues here, could you please remove the citation style and reliable sources tag.

1670: 452: 420: 142: 100: 1818: 412: 2588:

I don't see how such poorly referenced information belongs in the lede, even if we can resolve the verification problems. --

2055:

Given the extent of the COI-editing here, I think a far more detailed review and cleanup are needed than I have time for. --

1688: 521:

Can't find references to her inventing chalupas for Taco Bell or AirHogs helicopters, are those statements just vandalism?

2409:

I didn't see that the content was restored without consensus. We could copy it here for discussion, if that would help. --

251: 214: 2701:

As head of her own company, For Your Ease Only, Greiner has invented more than 600 products and procured over 120 patents

3215:

As I said, I don't believe any of the edits, other than perhaps the tag, have anything to do with the other disputes. --

922: 715:

I have removed the content above as it is not sourced and there is no indication as to what it means. Also according to

644: 75: 3604:

Thanks. Just wanted to be sure before putting it up in the article. There's also a LCU instagram page that has this up.

2474: 2916:

At least you're not denying it. Thank you. That's a step in the right direction. Now, on to improving this article.

1598:"Lori Greiner And AMG/Parade Introduce Premiere Issue Of The New Lifestyle Magazine Living Inspired By Lori Greiner" 329: 308: 3526: 3414:

working on the paragraph containing the annoying long list of products, but I'll leave that project in your hands.

925:

require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see

869:

editors involved, the amount of content they've added, and the promotional nature of the content strongly suggests

792: 3011:

Could you please answer the question? I feel it's essential it be answered before the offer can be considered. --

2406:

I'm happy to explain my perspective in more detail on the relevant content policies and the specific references.

1441: 1433: 1339: 1331: 612: 261: 2046: 2000: 1961: 2814:

We don't "educate" by promoting, or echoing promotion. That's been the problem with this article all along. --

940: 526: 63: 1217: 1044: 1003: 962: 776: 494: 1309: 1177: 1138: 1103: 1081: 761: 628: 416: 32: 3493: 2602:

I've gone ahead and removed the content as required in a BLP since there is clearly no consensus for it. --

1098:, I would appreciate your response on these changes. Looking forward to hearing back from you soon. Thanks! 3462: 2802: 2709: 2646: 1827: 1736: 1642: 575: 1930: 1893: 1877: 936: 3522: 3378:

it from the article entirely. If you want it restored for some reason, let me know. As you requested, I

930: 821: 708: 490: 81: 3458: 3489: 1971:

Confirm that each reference meets BLP standards and is used in an encyclopedic and neutral manner. --

1912: 1904: 1801: 1695: 1678: 1674: 1464: 1362: 1231: 998:- I missed one out, now I have fixed all. Please review them and remove the tags, please. Thank you. 918: 660: 620: 571: 567: 478: 474: 462: 430: 42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 1926: 1889: 1873: 3395: 2042: 2038: 1996: 1957: 1664: 1112:

Publication dates still missing. Please appreciate that you got any response at all to the ping. --

843: 446: 3633: 3612: 3572: 3539: 2663:

that would be OR, and covering for sloppy reporting, neither of which we should be doing in a BLP.

345:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1745:

According to the article statistics, those three editors are the top contributors to the article.

1543: 1247: 730: 700: 547: 46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 2506:"Lessons From the Shark Tank: Lori Greiner Shares Advice, Inspiration and a Season 9 Sneak Peek" 2024:

The Seeking Alpha piece is a press release and doesn't mention Griener, so should be removed. --

3570: 2012:

The Business Insider piece is a puff piece. I'm not sure it's so bad that it should be removed.

3637: 3616: 3576: 3543: 3039:

No, the offer is not clear. You'll not clarify it regarding how Knowledge's policies apply? --

2797: 2704: 2667:

Business ref reads like a pr piece for Greiner's lawyers, but might have some context as well.

2641: 1822: 1779: 1731: 1637: 1425: 1323: 3486: 3434: 3419: 3404: 3327: 3291: 3235: 3202: 3160: 3124: 3059: 3030: 3002: 2970: 2921: 2889: 2838: 2772: 2758: 2392: 2327: 2295: 2263: 2234: 2202: 2109: 2075: 1449: 1445: 1347: 1343: 596: 134: 226: 208: 3595: 3507: 3477: 3348: 3308: 3270: 3249: 3220: 3187: 3138: 3108: 3073: 3044: 3016: 2985: 2907: 2861: 2819: 2786: 2727: 2676: 2622: 2607: 2593: 2569: 2479: 2414: 2378: 2309: 2281: 2248: 2216: 2134: 2090: 2060: 2029: 1976: 1908: 1812: 1797: 1691: 1632: 1602: 1556: 1460: 1358: 1239: 692: 458: 426: 39: 2562:. The non-video version is identified as an opinion piece, so should not be used at all. 3611:. Maybe this will help out with the debate about whether she was born in 1960 or 1969. 3536: 2746: 2429: 1756: 1709: 1660: 1496: 1386: 1267: 1257: 1195: 1156: 1117: 1058: 1017: 980: 926: 885: 812: 442: 242: 1381:

There have been no improvements to the sourcing since I last looked at the article. --

3649: 3608: 3587: 3100: 2994: 2872: 2830: 2533: 2319: 2273: 2118: 1453: 1351: 874: 870: 866: 722: 716: 684: 604: 539: 3519: 1854: 3096: 1523:"'Shark Tank' Star Lori Greiner's 5 Major Rules for Becoming a Successful Inventor" 676: 2703:, and the other info in the article, there's no question that she's an inventor. 3430: 3415: 3400: 3386: 3323: 3287: 3244:

You're ignoring the purpose of this discussion, disrupting it in the process. --

3231: 3198: 3156: 3120: 3055: 3026: 2998: 2966: 2917: 2885: 2834: 2768: 2754: 2388: 2323: 2291: 2259: 2230: 2198: 2105: 2071: 1793: 503:) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. 439:) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. 118: 94: 3591: 3565: 3503: 3473: 3344: 3304: 3266: 3245: 3216: 3183: 3134: 3104: 3069: 3040: 3012: 2981: 2903: 2857: 2815: 2782: 2741:

for being an inventor is completely irrelevant. What matters is whether it is

2723: 2688: 2672: 2635: 2618: 2603: 2589: 2410: 2374: 2305: 2277: 2244: 2212: 2130: 2086: 2056: 2025: 1972: 1950: 1572:"'Shark Tank' Star Lori Greiner's Husband Dan Has Always Supported Her Career" 232: 124: 560:

I can't find any reference to Travis Stork as Greiner's spouse. In fact, in

411:

to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include

3391: 1787: 1752: 1720: 1705: 1628: 1492: 1419: 1382: 1263: 1207: 1191: 1167: 1152: 1128: 1113: 1093: 1071: 1054: 1034: 1013: 993: 976: 897: 881: 808: 341:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in 3605: 2387:

Twelve hours later. Keep baiting, a-hole. Come on, continue talking to me.

803:

It is recommended that, as a courtesy, you first try asking the editor who

1437: 1335: 342: 3535:

IMDB isn't a reliable source as it's user generated just like Knowledge.

3265:

Any policy-based objections to removing the references from the lede? --

3151:

in the thread below. I already informed TimTempleton of my decision via

2559:

The Inc ref is a video version of a previously rejected publicity piece

180: 3630: 3025:

The offer speaks very clearly for itself. Do you accept it? Yes or no?

2211:

I'm not misrepresenting anything. Please take some time to cool off. --

1527: 972:

Thank you for fixing some of the references. They all need to be fixed.

668: 257: 2440: 1429: 1327: 3641: 3620: 3599: 3580: 3547: 3530: 3511: 3497: 3481: 3466: 3438: 3423: 3408: 3352: 3331: 3312: 3295: 3274: 3253: 3239: 3224: 3206: 3191: 3164: 3142: 3128: 3112: 3077: 3063: 3048: 3034: 3020: 3006: 2989: 2974: 2925: 2911: 2893: 2865: 2842: 2823: 2806: 2790: 2776: 2762: 2731: 2713: 2680: 2650: 2626: 2611: 2597: 2418: 2396: 2382: 2331: 2313: 2299: 2285: 2267: 2252: 2238: 2220: 2206: 2138: 2113: 2094: 2079: 2064: 2050: 2033: 2004: 1980: 1965: 1934: 1916: 1897: 1881: 1831: 1805: 1760: 1740: 1713: 1646: 1500: 1468: 1390: 1366: 1271: 1221: 1199: 1181: 1160: 1142: 1121: 1107: 1085: 1062: 1053:

The publication date and author is missing from most of the refs. --

1048: 1021: 1007: 984: 966: 889: 850: 780: 737: 583: 554: 530: 154:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 3457:

9 December 1969 (age 53 years), Chicago, Illinois, United States

1853:

Mrs. Greiner's parents divorced in March of 1969. It's mentioned

564:

and several other places her husband is listed as Dan Greiner.

2811:

I agree. It's fine for the article body, as has been discussed.

1312:

by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

764:

by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

1297: 906: 749: 652: 636: 396: 57: 38:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

15: 3671:

Unknown-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles

2021:

The Bustle piece is far over the line and should be removed.

1903:

Content aside, this is a massive BLP violation. Please read

179: 2475:"Lori Greiner's 5 Rules for Becoming a Successful Inventor" 3487:

https://allfamous.org/de/people/lori-greiner-19691209.html

3343:

that we both want to work on them for the same reasons. --

409:

contributors may be personally or professionally connected

2898:

And your continuing as you are is not "total hypocrisy"?

2572:

and do not demonstrate any encyclopedic value or weight.

880:

I've added a few more tags specific to these problems. --

256:, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to 3379: 3375: 3282: 3180: 3152: 3148: 2876: 2854: 2852: 2850: 2848: 2560: 2371: 2226: 1817:

The tags have already been removed. Please also review

1491:

So of the three potential refs, one might me usable. --

1148: 804: 3666:

Start-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles

2565:

The ABC biography is promotional and not independent.

1751:

I've removed the Forbes ref and the associated tag. --

1476:

Thanks for the cleanup work. I'll look it over later.

929:. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see 856:

It certainly is much better. Thank you for the work.

2693:- this sources her numerous inventions and patents. 2018:

The Success piece is similarly poor and promotional.

3726:

Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions

2439:Greiner has more than 500 inventions and holds 120 2009:

You removed the Entrepreneur opinion piece, thanks.

1378:

There are no notability issues here that I'm aware.

957:Please remove the tag of close connection as well. 2318:You're solidifying your infamous reputation as an 1375:No, all the references are not properly formatted. 290:This article has not yet received a rating on the 3520:https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4883262/?ref_=ext_shr 2699:calling her an inventor and counting her patents 1748:I've removed the citation style tag. My mistake. 2767:Removed ABC and Inc refs, per agreement above. 8: 2902:Seems like you're just trolling me there. -- 1821:if you have a connection with the subject. 487:) This user has contributed to the article. 471:) This user has contributed to the article. 455:) This user has contributed to the article. 61: 2900:so perhaps you didn't read them carefully. 2243:I'm trying to deescalate your behavior. -- 2160: 565: 303: 203: 89: 3716:Articles edited by connected contributors 3706:Low-importance Women in Business articles 3676:Actors and filmmakers work group articles 2528: 2526: 2469: 2467: 2465: 1012:There are still incomplete references. -- 826:template's answer parameter to read from 3103:seems to be what you're trying to do. -- 2504:Hochwald, Lambeth (September 15, 2017). 3516:Whst about IMDB? Same date in question. 3472:Please provide a reliable reference. -- 3175:Cleanup reverted for no apparent reason 2461: 2163: 1513: 679:, January 2011, May 2010, November 2009 355:Knowledge:WikiProject Women in Business 305: 205: 91: 3711:WikiProject Women in Business articles 3701:Start-Class Women in Business articles 3211: 2997:. Do you accept the offer? Yes or no? 2899: 2719: 2700: 2660: 2499: 2497: 2320:inistigating, passive-aggressive troll 1728:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard 1552: 1541: 834: 828: 358:Template:WikiProject Women in Business 3119:offer won't be on the table forever. 1147:I gave you an example of the problem 7: 3230:content disputes, both old and new. 2720:Is she famous for being an inventor? 2556:These edits add two new references: 1687:) is almost certainly a paid editor 1372:Hi FamJoshua1. Welcome to Knowledge. 335:This article is within the scope of 248:This article is within the scope of 140:This article is within the scope of 3691:Unknown-importance Chicago articles 3656:Biography articles of living people 3300:Thanks for removing some. Progress! 2749:: "Determining notability does not 2304:This is disruptive. Please stop. -- 2290:Nope, incapable. Keep talking. Go. 1596:Markerts, Insider (March 8, 2019). 80:It is of interest to the following 3399:article that bothers me the most. 1995:. Thank you for the instructions. 1551:Cite has empty unknown parameter: 1521:DiPiazza, Daniel (June 28, 2016). 14: 2718:I think we agree. My question is 2661:If it's 500 and they mistyped 600 2015:The Advisors piece is much worse. 1482:The Inc ref is a publicity piece. 1413:Thanks, appreciate your support! 191:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers 2737:entire article. Asking if she's 1986: 1488:The last ref is a press release. 1397:Providing improvement to sources 1301: 975:Thank you for the disclosure. -- 949:) has been paid by Phil Phallen. 910: 791: 753: 400: 328: 307: 235: 225: 207: 127: 117: 93: 62: 21:This article must adhere to the 2082:14:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC) 1704:) a likely COI of some sort. -- 797:Please consult assigning editor 375:This article has been rated as 164:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 3681:WikiProject Biography articles 3661:Start-Class biography articles 3155:self-revert on his talk page. 2732:20:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC) 2714:19:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC) 2681:00:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC) 2651:00:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC) 2627:17:54, 23 September 2022 (UTC) 2612:17:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC) 2598:22:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC) 2568:Both these new references are 2419:17:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC) 2397:09:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC) 2383:17:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC) 2332:05:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC) 2314:21:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2300:21:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2286:20:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2268:20:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2253:20:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2239:18:51, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2221:18:34, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2207:17:37, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2139:16:51, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2114:16:35, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2095:16:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC) 2080:14:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC) 1832:17:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC) 1819:Knowledge:Conflict of interest 1806:00:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC) 1761:22:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 1741:21:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 1714:20:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 1647:17:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 1479:As for the potential new refs: 687:, December 2010, November 2009 615:, February 2013, February 2012 167:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 3642:06:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC) 3621:05:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC) 3600:03:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC) 3581:00:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC) 3512:22:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC) 3498:10:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 3482:17:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC) 3467:16:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC) 1570:Milano, Marie (May 5, 2019). 1501:17:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 1469:17:02, 6 September 2019 (UTC) 555:18:27, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 531:02:28, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 349:and see a list of open tasks. 338:WikiProject Women in Business 270:Knowledge:WikiProject Chicago 188:This article is supported by 24:biographies of living persons 3696:WikiProject Chicago articles 3686:Start-Class Chicago articles 3439:13:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC) 3424:07:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC) 3409:19:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC) 3353:19:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC) 3332:18:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC) 3313:18:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC) 3296:18:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC) 3275:16:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC) 3254:23:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3240:17:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3225:17:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3207:16:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3192:16:40, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3165:13:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC) 3143:18:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC) 3129:18:48, 22 October 2022 (UTC) 3113:23:40, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3078:23:40, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3064:17:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3049:17:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3035:16:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3021:16:51, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 3007:16:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 2990:16:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 2975:15:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 2926:17:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 2912:16:27, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 2894:13:07, 21 October 2022 (UTC) 2866:19:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC) 2843:16:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC) 2824:20:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC) 2807:19:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC) 2791:16:45, 18 October 2022 (UTC) 2777:18:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC) 2763:10:03, 15 October 2022 (UTC) 1272:16:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC) 1222:06:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC) 1200:15:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 1182:06:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC) 1161:19:53, 6 February 2019 (UTC) 1143:18:56, 6 February 2019 (UTC) 1122:16:57, 6 February 2019 (UTC) 1108:06:00, 6 February 2019 (UTC) 1086:18:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC) 1063:16:46, 28 January 2019 (UTC) 1049:11:48, 28 January 2019 (UTC) 1022:18:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC) 1008:17:56, 24 January 2019 (UTC) 985:16:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC) 967:13:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC) 890:18:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 851:12:12, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 781:09:26, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 584:17:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC) 273:Template:WikiProject Chicago 152:contribute to the discussion 3721:Implemented requested edits 3548:09:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 3531:05:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 3336:Good points all. Thank you. 2065:01:05, 2 January 2022 (UTC) 2051:23:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC) 2034:21:04, 1 January 2022 (UTC) 2005:20:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC) 1981:18:18, 1 January 2022 (UTC) 1966:17:54, 1 January 2022 (UTC) 1935:14:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 1917:14:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 1898:14:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 1882:14:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 36:must be removed immediately 3742: 3429:changing any of my edits. 2124:Those were only a list of 738:15:50, 15 March 2013 (UTC) 536:I've removed it. Thanks.-- 381:project's importance scale 361:Women in Business articles 292:project's importance scale 3283:removed three of the refs 2099:What the fuck? I removed 1943:COI header not actionable 1442:The Philadelphia Inquirer 1340:The Philadelphia Inquirer 1151:. Please fix the rest. -- 671:, November 2011, May 2010 613:The View (U.S. TV series) 374: 323: 289: 262:Chicago metropolitan area 220: 187: 112: 88: 3133:I chose to follow DR. -- 1846:DOB 1960 instead of 1969 1434:Crain's Chicago Business 1391:23:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC) 1367:22:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC) 1332:Crain's Chicago Business 1204:Thanks for the response 407:The following Knowledge 3502:That's not reliable. -- 629:Entrepreneur (magazine) 2454: 2445: 1294:Requesting tag removal 1252:look like obvious UPE. 184: 70:This article is rated 3453:Year of Birth Missing 3394:has its own article. 2449: 2437: 2192:removed all the ones 805:assigned the template 746:Some proposed changes 709:O, The Oprah Magazine 421:neutral point of view 183: 143:WikiProject Biography 106:Actors and Filmmakers 3286:about her QVC show. 1673:) is unclear, while 919:Wikimedia Foundation 661:Bloomberg Television 621:Good Morning America 590:Parking content here 413:conflict of interest 2956:Offer of compromise 1623:Hatnotes discussion 1262:is questionable. -- 252:WikiProject Chicago 645:Town & Country 185: 170:biography articles 76:content assessment 3607:I'll ask over at 3560:College grad year 2403: 2402: 1426:Bustle (magazine) 1324:Bustle (magazine) 1316: 1315: 955: 954: 786:Reply 23-JAN-2019 768: 767: 695:, January 27 2010 586: 570:comment added by 509: 508: 395: 394: 391: 390: 387: 386: 352:Women in Business 315:Women in Business 302: 301: 298: 297: 202: 201: 198: 197: 56: 55: 3733: 3523:Peacekeeper 1234 2692: 2639: 2549: 2548: 2546: 2544: 2530: 2521: 2520: 2518: 2516: 2501: 2492: 2491: 2489: 2487: 2471: 2424:Recent expansion 2322:. So, continue. 2165:Extended content 2161: 1994: 1990: 1989: 1954: 1816: 1791: 1783: 1724: 1615: 1614: 1612: 1610: 1593: 1587: 1586: 1584: 1582: 1567: 1561: 1560: 1554: 1549: 1547: 1539: 1537: 1535: 1518: 1450:Entrepreneur.com 1446:Business Insider 1423: 1348:Entrepreneur.com 1344:Business Insider 1305: 1304: 1298: 1261: 1251: 1243: 1235: 1211: 1171: 1132: 1097: 1075: 1038: 997: 914: 913: 907: 901: 848: 846: 836: 830: 825: 799: 795: 757: 756: 750: 736: 733: 701:SUCCESS Magazine 597:CBS This Morning 553: 550: 404: 403: 397: 363: 362: 359: 356: 353: 332: 325: 324: 319: 311: 304: 278: 277: 276:Chicago articles 274: 271: 268: 245: 240: 239: 238: 229: 222: 221: 211: 204: 172: 171: 168: 165: 162: 148:join the project 137: 135:Biography portal 132: 131: 130: 121: 114: 113: 108: 97: 90: 73: 67: 66: 58: 44:this noticeboard 16: 3741: 3740: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3646: 3645: 3562: 3455: 3177: 2958: 2686: 2633: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2542: 2540: 2532: 2531: 2524: 2514: 2512: 2503: 2502: 2495: 2485: 2483: 2473: 2472: 2463: 2426: 2404: 2166: 1987: 1985: 1948: 1945: 1848: 1810: 1785: 1777: 1718: 1625: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1608: 1606: 1603:Markets Insider 1595: 1594: 1590: 1580: 1578: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1550: 1540: 1533: 1531: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1417: 1399: 1302: 1296: 1255: 1245: 1237: 1229: 1205: 1165: 1126: 1091: 1069: 1032: 991: 911: 895: 844: 842: 819: 807:— in this case 790: 788: 754: 748: 731: 720: 711:, December 2009 693:Financial Times 647:, November 2010 631:, December 2012 592: 548: 537: 519: 517:Unsubstantiated 514: 401: 360: 357: 354: 351: 350: 317: 275: 272: 269: 266: 265: 241: 236: 234: 169: 166: 163: 160: 159: 133: 128: 126: 103: 74:on Knowledge's 71: 12: 11: 5: 3739: 3737: 3729: 3728: 3723: 3718: 3713: 3708: 3703: 3698: 3693: 3688: 3683: 3678: 3673: 3668: 3663: 3658: 3648: 3647: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3561: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3533: 3517: 3454: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3426: 3411: 3383: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3340: 3337: 3319: 3301: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3176: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 2957: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2812: 2765: 2752: 2668: 2664: 2658: 2551: 2550: 2534:"Lori Greiner" 2522: 2493: 2460: 2459: 2455: 2425: 2422: 2401: 2400: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2168: 2167: 2164: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2122: 2043:Caleb Stanford 2022: 2019: 2016: 2013: 2010: 1997:Caleb Stanford 1958:Caleb Stanford 1944: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1920: 1919: 1847: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1749: 1746: 1656: 1653: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1588: 1562: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1480: 1477: 1458: 1457: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1314: 1313: 1306: 1295: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1253: 1227: 1187: 1088: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 988: 987: 973: 953: 952: 951: 950: 937:103.57.71.178. 931:WP:COIRESPONSE 915: 905: 904: 865:The number of 854: 853: 839: 816: 787: 784: 766: 765: 758: 747: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 705: 703:, January 2010 697: 689: 681: 673: 665: 663:, October 2012 657: 655:, October 2012 649: 641: 639:, January 2012 633: 625: 623:, January 2013 617: 609: 601: 591: 588: 558: 557: 523:71.139.177.218 518: 515: 513: 512:DYK nomination 510: 507: 506: 505: 504: 488: 472: 456: 440: 405: 393: 392: 389: 388: 385: 384: 377:Low-importance 373: 367: 366: 364: 347:the discussion 333: 321: 320: 318:Low‑importance 312: 300: 299: 296: 295: 288: 282: 281: 279: 247: 246: 243:Chicago portal 230: 218: 217: 212: 200: 199: 196: 195: 186: 176: 175: 173: 139: 138: 122: 110: 109: 98: 86: 85: 79: 68: 54: 53: 49:this help page 33:poorly sourced 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3738: 3727: 3724: 3722: 3719: 3717: 3714: 3712: 3709: 3707: 3704: 3702: 3699: 3697: 3694: 3692: 3689: 3687: 3684: 3682: 3679: 3677: 3674: 3672: 3669: 3667: 3664: 3662: 3659: 3657: 3654: 3653: 3651: 3644: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3571: 3567: 3559: 3549: 3545: 3541: 3538: 3534: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3521: 3518: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3488: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3479: 3475: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3452: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3427: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3412: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3397: 3393: 3390:to it. Also, 3388: 3384: 3381: 3377: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3341: 3338: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3320: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3284: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3174: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2955: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2853: 2851: 2849: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2805: 2803: 2801: 2800: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2750: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2712: 2710: 2708: 2707: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2669: 2665: 2662: 2659: 2655: 2654: 2652: 2649: 2647: 2645: 2644: 2637: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2614: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2600: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2586: 2583: 2580: 2577: 2573: 2571: 2566: 2563: 2561: 2557: 2539: 2535: 2529: 2527: 2523: 2511: 2507: 2500: 2498: 2494: 2482: 2481: 2476: 2470: 2468: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2453: 2448: 2447:To "Career": 2444: 2442: 2436: 2435:To the lede: 2433: 2431: 2423: 2421: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2407: 2399: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2385: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2195: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2162: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2127: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2083: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2020: 2017: 2014: 2011: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1993: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1952: 1942: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1905:WP:BLPPRIVACY 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1870: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1856: 1851: 1845: 1833: 1830: 1828: 1826: 1825: 1820: 1814: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1789: 1781: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1737: 1735: 1734: 1729: 1722: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1700: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1686: 1683: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1669: 1666: 1662: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1645: 1643: 1641: 1640: 1634: 1630: 1622: 1605: 1604: 1599: 1592: 1589: 1577: 1576:Countryliving 1573: 1566: 1563: 1558: 1545: 1530: 1529: 1524: 1517: 1514: 1510: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1478: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1455: 1454:New York Post 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1421: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1353: 1352:New York Post 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1319: 1311: 1307: 1300: 1299: 1293: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1259: 1254: 1249: 1241: 1233: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1214:103.57.71.176 1209: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1188: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1174:103.57.71.179 1169: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1135:103.57.71.179 1130: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1100:103.57.71.179 1095: 1089: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1078:103.57.71.179 1073: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1041:103.57.71.190 1036: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1001: 1000:103.57.71.178 995: 990: 989: 986: 982: 978: 974: 971: 970: 969: 968: 964: 960: 959:103.57.71.178 948: 945: 942: 938: 935: 934: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 909: 908: 899: 894: 893: 892: 891: 887: 883: 878: 876: 872: 868: 863: 860: 857: 852: 849: 847: 838:. Thank you! 837: 831: 823: 817: 814: 810: 806: 802: 801: 800: 798: 794: 785: 783: 782: 778: 774: 773:103.57.71.178 763: 759: 752: 751: 745: 739: 734: 728: 727: 726: 718: 714: 713: 712: 710: 706: 704: 702: 698: 696: 694: 690: 688: 686: 685:Family Circle 682: 680: 678: 674: 672: 670: 666: 664: 662: 658: 656: 654: 650: 648: 646: 642: 640: 638: 634: 632: 630: 626: 624: 622: 618: 616: 614: 610: 608: 606: 605:Anderson Live 602: 600: 598: 594: 593: 589: 587: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 563: 556: 551: 545: 544: 543: 535: 534: 533: 532: 528: 524: 516: 511: 502: 499: 496: 492: 491:103.57.71.178 489: 486: 483: 480: 476: 473: 470: 467: 464: 460: 457: 454: 451: 448: 444: 441: 438: 435: 432: 428: 425: 424: 422: 418: 417:autobiography 414: 410: 406: 399: 398: 382: 378: 372: 369: 368: 365: 348: 344: 340: 339: 334: 331: 327: 326: 322: 316: 313: 310: 306: 293: 287: 284: 283: 280: 263: 259: 255: 254: 253: 244: 233: 231: 228: 224: 223: 219: 216: 213: 210: 206: 193: 192: 182: 178: 177: 174: 157: 156:documentation 153: 149: 145: 144: 136: 125: 123: 120: 116: 115: 111: 107: 102: 99: 96: 92: 87: 83: 77: 69: 65: 60: 59: 51: 50: 45: 41: 37: 34: 30: 26: 25: 20: 18: 17: 3627: 3563: 3459:Sunny Diyali 3456: 3264: 3178: 3094: 2962: 2959: 2880: 2799:TimTempleton 2798: 2742: 2738: 2706:TimTempleton 2705: 2643:TimTempleton 2642: 2615: 2601: 2587: 2584: 2581: 2578: 2574: 2567: 2564: 2558: 2555: 2541:. Retrieved 2537: 2515:September 6, 2513:. Retrieved 2509: 2478: 2456: 2450: 2446: 2438: 2434: 2427: 2408: 2405: 2386: 2370: 2227:edit summary 2193: 2125: 2100: 2039:WP:THENFIXIT 1991: 1946: 1886: 1872: 1871: 1868: 1864: 1863: 1859: 1852: 1849: 1824:TimTempleton 1823: 1780:Timtempleton 1733:TimTempleton 1732: 1698: 1681: 1667: 1639:TimTempleton 1638: 1626: 1607:. Retrieved 1601: 1591: 1579:. Retrieved 1575: 1565: 1532:. Retrieved 1526: 1516: 1508: 1459: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1357: 1320: 1317: 1310:edit request 956: 943: 923:Terms of Use 879: 864: 861: 858: 855: 841: 833: 827: 822:request edit 796: 789: 769: 762:edit request 724: 723: 707: 699: 691: 683: 675: 667: 659: 651: 643: 635: 627: 619: 611: 607:, March 2013 603: 599:, March 2013 595: 566:— Preceding 559: 541: 540: 520: 497: 481: 465: 449: 433: 408: 376: 336: 250: 249: 189: 141: 82:WikiProjects 47: 35: 28: 22: 3490:DenisKorwin 3387:Scrub Daddy 2751:necessarily 1609:4 September 1581:4 September 1534:4 September 1318:Hey Ronz, 1226:No problem. 677:Woman's Day 72:Start-class 3650:Categories 2743:noteworthy 2543:August 20, 2486:August 20, 2484:Retrieved 2457:References 1909:Praxidicae 1813:FamJoshua1 1798:FamJoshua1 1692:Eirekara98 1675:Philpallen 1633:FamJoshua1 1509:References 1461:FamJoshua1 1359:FamJoshua1 1240:Eirekara98 1232:Philpallen 845:Spintendo 572:Ssonwalkar 475:Philpallen 459:Eirekara98 427:FamJoshua1 3392:Drop Stop 2430:sanctions 2101:precisely 1927:THCM THCM 1890:THCM THCM 1874:THCM THCM 1661:Dtrebbien 1544:cite news 1258:Dtrebbien 877:editing. 840:Regards, 813:talk page 443:Dtrebbien 161:Biography 101:Biography 40:libellous 3396:Marzetti 2657:soapbox. 2570:WP:PROMO 2452:patents. 1702:contribs 1685:contribs 1671:contribs 1438:NY Times 1336:NY Times 947:contribs 829:|ans=yes 725:Keithbob 580:contribs 568:unsigned 542:Keithbob 501:contribs 485:contribs 469:contribs 453:contribs 437:contribs 343:business 3634:Kcj5062 3613:Kcj5062 3573:Kcj5062 3540:Kcj5062 3537:WP:IMDB 3376:removed 3149:comment 3147:See my 3095:Follow 2877:comment 2747:WP:NOTE 2695:] With 2441:patents 2272:Please 1528:Inc.com 1186:Thanks. 927:WP:PAID 873:if not 835:|ans=no 669:InStyle 562:Crain's 379:on the 267:Chicago 260:or the 258:Chicago 215:Chicago 3609:WP:RSN 3588:WP:RSN 3431:Stoarm 3416:Stoarm 3401:Stoarm 3324:Stoarm 3288:Stoarm 3232:Stoarm 3213:verify 3199:Stoarm 3157:Stoarm 3121:Stoarm 3101:WP:DRN 3056:Stoarm 3027:Stoarm 2999:Stoarm 2995:WP:FOC 2967:Stoarm 2918:Stoarm 2886:Stoarm 2873:WP:FOC 2835:Stoarm 2831:WP:FOC 2769:Stoarm 2755:Stoarm 2739:famous 2697:Parade 2510:Parade 2389:Stoarm 2324:Stoarm 2292:Stoarm 2274:WP:FOC 2260:Stoarm 2231:Stoarm 2199:Stoarm 2119:WP:FOC 2106:Stoarm 2072:Stoarm 1690:, and 1430:Forbes 1328:Forbes 1248:Dcnrkb 875:WP:UPE 871:WP:COI 867:WP:SPA 717:WP:MOS 419:, and 78:scale. 3629:time. 3592:Hipal 3569:1982. 3566:Hipal 3504:Hipal 3474:Hipal 3380:moved 3345:Hipal 3318:them? 3305:Hipal 3267:Hipal 3246:Hipal 3217:Hipal 3184:Hipal 3135:Hipal 3105:Hipal 3097:WP:DR 3070:Hipal 3041:Hipal 3013:Hipal 2982:Hipal 2904:Hipal 2858:Hipal 2816:Hipal 2783:Hipal 2724:Hipal 2689:Hipal 2673:Hipal 2636:Hipal 2619:Hipal 2604:Hipal 2590:Hipal 2411:Hipal 2375:Hipal 2306:Hipal 2278:Hipal 2245:Hipal 2213:Hipal 2131:Hipal 2087:Hipal 2057:Hipal 2026:Hipal 1973:Hipal 1951:Hipal 1947:Dear 1401:Hi, 1308:This 760:This 3638:talk 3617:talk 3596:talk 3590:. -- 3577:talk 3544:talk 3527:talk 3508:talk 3494:talk 3478:talk 3463:talk 3435:talk 3420:talk 3405:talk 3349:talk 3328:talk 3309:talk 3292:talk 3271:talk 3250:talk 3236:talk 3221:talk 3203:talk 3188:talk 3161:talk 3153:this 3139:talk 3125:talk 3109:talk 3074:talk 3060:talk 3045:talk 3031:talk 3017:talk 3003:talk 2986:talk 2971:talk 2922:talk 2908:talk 2890:talk 2862:talk 2839:talk 2820:talk 2787:talk 2773:talk 2759:talk 2728:talk 2677:talk 2623:talk 2608:talk 2594:talk 2545:2022 2517:2019 2488:2022 2480:Inc. 2415:talk 2393:talk 2379:talk 2328:talk 2310:talk 2296:talk 2282:talk 2276:. -- 2264:talk 2249:talk 2235:talk 2217:talk 2203:talk 2135:talk 2126:some 2110:talk 2091:talk 2076:talk 2061:talk 2047:talk 2030:talk 2001:talk 1992:Done 1977:talk 1962:talk 1931:talk 1913:talk 1894:talk 1878:talk 1855:here 1802:talk 1794:WP:V 1788:Ronz 1757:talk 1753:Ronz 1721:Ronz 1710:talk 1706:Ronz 1696:talk 1679:talk 1665:talk 1629:Ronz 1611:2019 1583:2019 1557:help 1536:2019 1497:talk 1493:Ronz 1465:talk 1420:Ronz 1387:talk 1383:Ronz 1363:talk 1268:talk 1264:Ronz 1218:talk 1208:Ronz 1196:talk 1192:Ronz 1178:talk 1168:Ronz 1157:talk 1153:Ronz 1149:here 1139:talk 1129:Ronz 1118:talk 1114:Ronz 1104:talk 1094:Ronz 1082:talk 1072:Ronz 1059:talk 1055:Ronz 1045:talk 1035:Ronz 1018:talk 1014:Ronz 1004:talk 994:Ronz 981:talk 977:Ronz 963:talk 941:talk 917:The 898:Ronz 886:talk 882:Ronz 809:Ronz 777:talk 732:Talk 576:talk 549:Talk 527:talk 495:talk 479:talk 463:talk 447:talk 431:talk 150:and 3179:Re 2963:and 2685:Hi 2632:Hi 2538:ABC 2194:you 1627:Hi 1553:|1= 1090:Hi 933:. 921:'s 832:to 653:CNN 637:NPR 423:. 371:Low 286:??? 29:BLP 3652:: 3640:) 3619:) 3598:) 3579:) 3546:) 3529:) 3510:) 3496:) 3480:) 3465:) 3437:) 3422:) 3407:) 3351:) 3330:) 3311:) 3294:) 3273:) 3252:) 3238:) 3223:) 3205:) 3190:) 3163:) 3141:) 3127:) 3111:) 3099:. 3076:) 3062:) 3047:) 3033:) 3019:) 3005:) 2988:) 2973:) 2924:) 2910:) 2892:) 2881:do 2864:) 2856:-- 2841:) 2833:. 2822:) 2789:) 2775:) 2761:) 2730:) 2679:) 2671:-- 2653:\ 2625:) 2617:-- 2610:) 2596:) 2536:. 2525:^ 2508:. 2496:^ 2477:. 2464:^ 2432:. 2417:) 2395:) 2381:) 2373:-- 2330:) 2312:) 2298:) 2284:) 2266:) 2251:) 2237:) 2219:) 2205:) 2137:) 2129:-- 2112:) 2093:) 2078:) 2063:) 2049:) 2032:) 2003:) 1979:) 1964:) 1933:) 1915:) 1907:. 1896:) 1880:) 1804:) 1759:) 1712:) 1600:. 1574:. 1548:: 1546:}} 1542:{{ 1525:. 1499:) 1467:) 1452:, 1448:, 1444:, 1440:, 1436:, 1432:, 1428:, 1389:) 1365:) 1350:, 1346:, 1342:, 1338:, 1334:, 1330:, 1326:, 1270:) 1244:, 1236:, 1220:) 1198:) 1190:-- 1180:) 1159:) 1141:) 1120:) 1106:) 1084:) 1061:) 1047:) 1020:) 1006:) 983:) 965:) 888:) 824:}} 820:{{ 779:) 735:• 729:• 721:— 582:) 578:• 552:• 546:• 538:— 529:) 415:, 104:: 3636:( 3615:( 3594:( 3575:( 3564:@ 3542:( 3525:( 3506:( 3492:( 3476:( 3461:( 3433:( 3418:( 3403:( 3347:( 3326:( 3307:( 3290:( 3269:( 3248:( 3234:( 3219:( 3201:( 3186:( 3159:( 3137:( 3123:( 3107:( 3072:( 3058:( 3043:( 3029:( 3015:( 3001:( 2984:( 2969:( 2920:( 2906:( 2888:( 2860:( 2837:( 2818:( 2785:( 2771:( 2757:( 2726:( 2691:: 2687:@ 2675:( 2638:: 2634:@ 2621:( 2606:( 2592:( 2547:. 2519:. 2490:. 2443:. 2413:( 2391:( 2377:( 2326:( 2308:( 2294:( 2280:( 2262:( 2247:( 2233:( 2215:( 2201:( 2133:( 2121:. 2108:( 2089:( 2074:( 2059:( 2045:( 2028:( 1999:( 1975:( 1960:( 1953:: 1949:@ 1929:( 1911:( 1892:( 1876:( 1815:: 1811:@ 1800:( 1790:: 1786:@ 1782:: 1778:@ 1755:( 1723:: 1719:@ 1708:( 1699:· 1694:( 1682:· 1677:( 1668:· 1663:( 1613:. 1585:. 1559:) 1555:( 1538:. 1495:( 1463:( 1422:: 1418:@ 1385:( 1361:( 1266:( 1260:: 1256:@ 1250:: 1246:@ 1242:: 1238:@ 1234:: 1230:@ 1216:( 1210:: 1206:@ 1194:( 1176:( 1170:: 1166:@ 1155:( 1137:( 1131:: 1127:@ 1116:( 1102:( 1096:: 1092:@ 1080:( 1074:: 1070:@ 1057:( 1043:( 1037:: 1033:@ 1016:( 1002:( 996:: 992:@ 979:( 961:( 944:· 939:( 900:: 896:@ 884:( 815:. 775:( 574:( 525:( 498:· 493:( 482:· 477:( 466:· 461:( 450:· 445:( 434:· 429:( 383:. 294:. 264:. 194:. 158:. 84:: 52:. 27:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index