Knowledge

Talk:Law (stochastic processes)

Source đź“ť

102: 81: 201: 191: 170: 50: 21: 325:
You may say: do not be ridiculous; we all understand that continuity is good, and discontinuity is bad. True. But consider the Poisson measure (for the Poisson process that jumps by 1 at random instants). Now continuous functions are of zero outer measure. Right continuous functions are of full
321:
However, 50 years ago I (being young) felt unsatisfied with it. You see, the set of continuous functions is (for Wiener measure) of full outer measure. But the set of everywhere discontinuous function is, too. Isn't it subjective, to prefer the former to the
279:
Nothing is said for now about the choice of a sigma-field on the set of functions. This is a somewhat subtle matter! The minimal sigma-field, generated by evaluations, fails to make the set of continuous functions measurable in the Wiener measure case.
295:
This has been bothering me as well; I notice you have been tackling this more recently in the main Stochastic Process article. I'm not sure, but there may be hints at a resolution in Appendix A (Section A.1.1) of
152: 257: 31: 378: 368: 363: 142: 383: 247: 373: 223: 118: 214: 175: 109: 86: 61: 305: 301: 27: 326:
outer measure. Left continuous functions are of full outer measure, too. What now? Which option is ridiculous?..
49: 67: 200: 101: 80: 20: 222:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
117:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
206: 190: 169: 342: 318:
Yes, this is more or less standard "resolution", and as such, worth mentioning on Knowledge.
285: 297: 346: 309: 289: 357: 338: 281: 219: 196: 114: 330: 329:
This dissatisfaction led me to a research mentioned briefly in Note 6 to "
334: 43: 15: 298:
http://page.math.tu-berlin.de/~friz/master4_May6th.pdf
218:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 113:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 8: 164: 75: 60:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 166: 77: 212:This redirect is within the scope of 107:This redirect is within the scope of 47: 7: 379:Redirect-Class mathematics articles 66:It is of interest to the following 30:on 7 September 2024. The result of 369:Low-importance Statistics articles 364:Redirect-Class Statistics articles 14: 384:Low-priority mathematics articles 232:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 252:This redirect has been rated as 235:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 199: 189: 168: 147:This redirect has been rated as 127:Knowledge:WikiProject Statistics 100: 79: 48: 19: 374:WikiProject Statistics articles 130:Template:WikiProject Statistics 26:This article was nominated for 290:12:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 226:and see a list of open tasks. 121:and see a list of open tasks. 347:20:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC) 310:18:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC) 400: 337:, if you feel interested. 251: 184: 146: 95: 74: 258:project's priority scale 302:Usernames are difficult 215:WikiProject Mathematics 110:WikiProject Statistics 333:" article. See also 238:mathematics articles 133:Statistics articles 207:Mathematics portal 62:content assessment 272: 271: 268: 267: 264: 263: 163: 162: 159: 158: 42: 41: 391: 240: 239: 236: 233: 230: 209: 204: 203: 193: 186: 185: 180: 172: 165: 153:importance scale 135: 134: 131: 128: 125: 104: 97: 96: 91: 83: 76: 53: 52: 44: 23: 16: 399: 398: 394: 393: 392: 390: 389: 388: 354: 353: 339:Boris Tsirelson 282:Boris Tsirelson 277: 237: 234: 231: 228: 227: 205: 198: 178: 132: 129: 126: 123: 122: 89: 12: 11: 5: 397: 395: 387: 386: 381: 376: 371: 366: 356: 355: 352: 351: 350: 349: 327: 323: 319: 313: 312: 276: 273: 270: 269: 266: 265: 262: 261: 250: 244: 243: 241: 224:the discussion 211: 210: 194: 182: 181: 173: 161: 160: 157: 156: 149:Low-importance 145: 139: 138: 136: 119:the discussion 105: 93: 92: 90:Low‑importance 84: 72: 71: 65: 54: 40: 39: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 396: 385: 382: 380: 377: 375: 372: 370: 367: 365: 362: 361: 359: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 317: 316: 315: 314: 311: 307: 303: 299: 294: 293: 292: 291: 287: 283: 274: 259: 255: 249: 246: 245: 242: 225: 221: 217: 216: 208: 202: 197: 195: 192: 188: 187: 183: 177: 174: 171: 167: 154: 150: 144: 141: 140: 137: 120: 116: 112: 111: 106: 103: 99: 98: 94: 88: 85: 82: 78: 73: 69: 63: 59: 55: 51: 46: 45: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 278: 254:Low-priority 253: 213: 179:Low‑priority 148: 108: 68:WikiProjects 57: 35: 229:Mathematics 220:mathematics 176:Mathematics 358:Categories 124:Statistics 115:statistics 87:Statistics 335:Ron Peled 331:Baire set 275:Untitled 58:redirect 36:redirect 28:deletion 322:latter? 256:on the 151:on the 64:scale. 56:This 343:talk 306:talk 286:talk 34:was 248:Low 143:Low 360:: 345:) 308:) 300:. 288:) 341:( 304:( 284:( 260:. 155:. 70:: 38:.

Index

Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Statistics
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Statistics
statistics
the discussion
Low
importance scale
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
Boris Tsirelson
talk
12:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
http://page.math.tu-berlin.de/~friz/master4_May6th.pdf
Usernames are difficult
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑