451:
and call that my second set, etc. until i've done this with each digit. Since each of these numbered sets would be small sets, their sum must be a small set. And yet, this sum would contain all of the natural numbers and then some. Since that would necessarily be a large set, we have a contradiction. Not to mention that this purported "fact" has the problem that the set you are subtracting from the natural numbers is smaller than the set that is left. I'm removing this section until its cited. Its possible I'm simply mistaken, or unclear on the definition but without being substantiated this unbelievable "fact" really is unbelievable.
84:
74:
53:
22:
450:
How can the set of numbers whose decimal representation excludes 7 possibly be a small set?? This seems absurd and isn't cited. In fact, to me this must necessarily be downright wrong since I could arbitrarily take out any digit of choice, and call that my first set, then move on to the next digit
264:
whose reciprocals contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions (an arithmetic progression of length n and common difference 1 starts after 1/2^n). But this series converges, bounding above by \sum n/2^n (which converges by the integral test).
420:
260:
140:
502:
130:
497:
106:
333:
474:
458:
436:
162:
Why does the divergence of the harmonic series imply the converse of the Erdos-Turan conjecture? In fact, isn't the converse false?
176:
97:
58:
303:
33:
21:
478:
462:
440:
273:
39:
299:
83:
454:
432:
291:
473:
It is correct, you misunderstood. A number like 1234568790 won't be in any of those small sets. --
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
73:
52:
426:
482:
466:
444:
307:
276:
491:
295:
102:
79:
168:(1)+(1/2+1/3)+(1/4+1/5+1/6)+(1/8+1/9+1/10+1/11)+(1/16+1/17+1/18+1/19+1/20)
320:
415:{\displaystyle \{\dots ,6,8,\dots ,16,18,\dots ,66,68,69,80,\dots \}}
327:(or any digit one prefers) is small. That is, for example, the set
165:
Thinking about the issue briefly, consider the subset of the series
268:
So the comment on the converse seems to be in error; any thoughts?
255:{\displaystyle \sum _{i=0}^{\infty }\sum _{j=0}^{i}1/(2^{i}+j)}
15:
287:
Hey sorry about the multiple edits with typos -- I am new.
272:
Agreed. The page is in error, and should be corrected.
336:
319:"Another known fact is that the set of numbers whose
179:
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
414:
254:
425:is small. (This has been generalized to other
8:
409:
337:
19:
47:
335:
237:
225:
216:
205:
195:
184:
178:
49:
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
196:
14:
503:Low-priority mathematics articles
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
498:Start-Class mathematics articles
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
135:This article has been rated as
249:
230:
1:
158:Why does divergence imply ...
109:and see a list of open tasks.
467:00:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
445:00:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
308:16:46, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
277:23:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
519:
134:
67:
46:
483:16:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
323:representations exclude
141:project's priority scale
98:WikiProject Mathematics
416:
256:
221:
200:
28:This article is rated
417:
257:
201:
180:
334:
177:
121:mathematics articles
412:
252:
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
457:comment added by
435:comment added by
311:
294:comment added by
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
510:
469:
447:
421:
419:
418:
413:
310:
288:
261:
259:
258:
253:
242:
241:
229:
220:
215:
199:
194:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
518:
517:
513:
512:
511:
509:
508:
507:
488:
487:
452:
430:
332:
331:
317:
289:
285:
233:
175:
174:
160:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
516:
514:
506:
505:
500:
490:
489:
486:
485:
423:
422:
411:
408:
405:
402:
399:
396:
393:
390:
387:
384:
381:
378:
375:
372:
369:
366:
363:
360:
357:
354:
351:
348:
345:
342:
339:
316:
313:
284:
281:
280:
279:
274:67.191.231.108
251:
248:
245:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
214:
211:
208:
204:
198:
193:
190:
187:
183:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
515:
504:
501:
499:
496:
495:
493:
484:
480:
476:
475:83.23.218.208
472:
471:
470:
468:
464:
460:
459:74.195.135.62
456:
448:
446:
442:
438:
437:74.195.135.62
434:
428:
406:
403:
400:
397:
394:
391:
388:
385:
382:
379:
376:
373:
370:
367:
364:
361:
358:
355:
352:
349:
346:
343:
340:
330:
329:
328:
326:
322:
314:
312:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
282:
278:
275:
271:
270:
269:
266:
262:
246:
243:
238:
234:
226:
222:
217:
212:
209:
206:
202:
191:
188:
185:
181:
172:
169:
166:
163:
157:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
449:
429:as well.)"
424:
324:
318:
315:Decimal reps
286:
267:
263:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
137:Low-priority
136:
96:
62:Low‑priority
40:WikiProjects
453:—Preceding
431:—Preceding
290:—Preceding
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
30:Start-class
492:Categories
455:unsigned
433:unsigned
304:contribs
292:unsigned
321:decimal
296:Mackold
139:on the
36:scale.
427:bases
283:Sorry
171:i.e.
479:talk
463:talk
441:talk
300:talk
131:Low
494::
481:)
465:)
443:)
407:…
401:80
395:69
389:68
383:66
377:…
371:18
365:16
359:…
341:…
306:)
302:•
203:∑
197:∞
182:∑
477:(
461:(
439:(
410:}
404:,
398:,
392:,
386:,
380:,
374:,
368:,
362:,
356:,
353:8
350:,
347:6
344:,
338:{
325:7
298:(
250:)
247:j
244:+
239:i
235:2
231:(
227:/
223:1
218:i
213:0
210:=
207:j
192:0
189:=
186:i
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
