Talk:Let There Be Love (Christina Aguilera song)

558: 540: 472: 451: 768: 799: 633: 608: 190: 891: 873: 233: 2859: 1164: 420: 700: 679: 349: 272: 2991:{{cite web|last=Trust|first=Gary|url=http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/1563027/chart-highlights-christina-aguileras-love-lifts-to-no-1-on|title=Chart Highlights: Christina Aguilera's 'Love' Lifts To No. 1 On Dance/Club Play Songs|work=Billboard|publisher=Prometheus Global Media|date=May 20, 2013|accessdate=May 21, 2013}}</ref: --> 3422: 1304: 1266: 1028: 1013: 3225:: Upon viewing the addendum in question, I have concluded that the expansive information would be an indiscriminate collection of information and would not serve an encyclopedic purpose. I do not believe a meticulous narrative of chart performance would be useful, so much as an asinine flow chart inappropriately maintained by Knowledge. 3128:

information, which is not encyclopaedic. What I added, the two small sentences, is hardly a chart trajectory. In fact, it's far from it. See ]] for more information, it is a discussion between Kww and myself about his removal. Obviously, I vote that my version be reinstated, as its clearly not a case

2260:

Wass echoed what Lanksy had written, concurring that the song could become a commercial success and that it ought to be a single. He also praised her vocal performance, writing that the production serves as the "perfect destination" for her "powerhouse pipes." ---- Wass shared Lanksy's sentiments and

1880:

He also noted that Aguilera was probably aware that the "Let There Be Love"'s melody bared strong resemblances to the songs, which most likely prompted her to spend "the last minute wailing all over the place." Aguilera "roars" the lyrics "Let there be let there be love/ Here in the here in the dark"

1385:

Its instrumentation consists of synths, "loud" drums and electronicas, and received comparisons to the songs recorded by Usher, "DJ Got Us Fallin' in Love" and "Scream", both of which were produced by Martin. --- Link instrumentation and change 'consists' to 'incorporates' and "loud" to abrasive. We

3276:

As I said up there above somewhere, if you can find one industry source that says that this particular song has had an unusual trajectory, then I think that would be sufficient reason to include it. Is there any reason that we are talking on my talk page instead of in the discussion on the article

3076:

chart on February 18, 2013. It broke into the top ten at number nine on April 20, 2013, after spending two months on the chart. Two weeks later on May 4, 2013, it climbed to number five, and for the following four weeks, it rose by one position per week, until it reached the top spot for the chart

1617:

Aguilera performed the song for first time at the 40th American Music Awards on November 2012, as part of a medley with Lotus tracks "Lotus Intro" and "Army of Me". She also performed the song on The Voice with the team who she coaches. --- Aguilera performed on televised programs such as the 40th

2653:

The genres in the infobox have been cherry picked. It has many influences but from the references the ones that should remain in the infobox as core genres should be Dance, pop, EDM. It has influences of trance, synthpop (numerous mentions of synthesizers), dance-pop and Eurodance (debatabley). —

3048:

As the section stands, there is a couple of sentences about this song's chart on the US Hot Dance Club Songs chart about its debut, breaking into the top 10, top 5 info about how it climbed one position week by week from 5-2 before peaking at number one. I did this because it gives a little info

2307:

Michael Gallucci for Popcrush thought that the song was not quite as good as "Your Body" and described the collaboration between Aguilera and Martin as "typical pop." ---- Michael Gallucci for Pop Crush thought that the song was not quite as good as "Your Body" and denounced it as "typical pop."

1328:

Aguilera reveleaed that she knew of Martin when she first debuted in the music industry, but wanted to collaborate with other producers before working with him. he singer continued to say that now she has come full circle in her career, and that she felt like it was the right time collaborate on

2537:

Fail it then, because you are wrong on several things. How you can say that musical structure, vocal and lyrical information does not belong in the composition section and that the picture of Usher should not be included is to be honest, stupid. A mere mention of a person is reason to include a

789: 1434:

Do you understand what I mean with, "We don't know whether those particular attributes encompass its composition."; We don't if the 'synths, "loud" drums and electronicas' are the track's only instrumentation. That's why I suggest you change the wording from 'consist' to 'incorporates'. —

2992:

With "Let There Be Love" attaining the number one position on the Hot Dance Club Songs chart, it upped her total tally to eight number one songs, and the second from ''Lotus'' to reach the peak, after "]" in December 2013.<ref name="US Dance Peak"/:

3107:

chart on February 18, 2013. It reached number one with the issue dated June 1, 2013. With "Let There Be Love" attaining the number one position on the Hot Dance Club Songs chart, it upped her total tally to eight number one songs, and the second from

3307:

Because this is a guideline, meaning that reasonable exceptions can be made. If you found that reliable industry sources were discussing how unusual the trajectory is, then I would view that as being a good reason to document the trajectory. Your

3123:

The problem with what Kww has removed from the article, even though it should stay for other editors to see as to form an opinion as only he has an issue, is that between it's mid February debut and it's 1st June dated chart release, there is

3493: 1479:

Many of them praised Aguilera for not over singing and delivering a solid vocal performance, while others complimented the musical structure and composition. --- Change to: Many reviewers considered "Let There Be Love" a stand-out track on

153: 353: 334: 2680:

The remove those three then. Idolator says "dance-pop track", how is that an influence exactly when he outright says it is dance-pop. Furthermore, synthpop is not written anyway. Inclusion of synths does not make it a synthpop song.

2981:{{cite web|url=http://www.billboard.com/charts/2013-04-20/danceclub-play-songs|title=Dance/Club Play Songs - April 20, 2013|work=Billboard|publisher=Prometheus Global Media|date=April 20, 2013|accessdate=May 21, 2013}}</ref: --> 2864: 1169: 2722:

Yeah, but you said it is a pop song with dance-pop influences. If both reviews say "pop song" and "dance-pop track", then they are both genres for the info box. Dance-pop isn't just an influence here. I've changed it all anyway.

2989:{{cite web|url=http://www.billboard.com/charts/2013-05-25/danceclub-play-songs|title=Dance/Club Play Songs - May 25, 2013|work=Billboard|publisher=Prometheus Global Media|date=May 25, 2013|accessdate=May 21, 2013}}</ref: --> 2987:{{cite web|url=http://www.billboard.com/charts/2013-05-18/danceclub-play-songs|title=Dance/Club Play Songs - May 18, 2013|work=Billboard|publisher=Prometheus Global Media|date=May 18, 2013|accessdate=May 21, 2013}}</ref: --> 2985:{{cite web|url=http://www.billboard.com/charts/2013-05-11/danceclub-play-songs|title=Dance/Club Play Songs - May 11, 2013|work=Billboard|publisher=Prometheus Global Media|date=May 11, 2013|accessdate=May 21, 2013}}</ref: --> 2983:{{cite web|url=http://www.billboard.com/charts/2013-05-04/danceclub-play-songs|title=Dance/Club Play Songs - May 4, 2013|work=Billboard|publisher=Prometheus Global Media|date=May 4, 2013|accessdate=May 21, 2013}}</ref: --> 2096:

Christina Garibaldi for MTV News praised the wrote the uptempo track, writing that its "heavy beat" and "sultry lyrics" were perfect for people to dance to in nightclubs. ------- This sentence needs some major restructuring.

1881:

over trance beats and projects a "saucy" tone as she sings ""Hit the right spot, making my eyes roll back." ---- These sentences are redundant for a composition section as they belong in a critical reception section. Remove.

2538:

picture. This song was heavily compared to two of his songs. I'm adamant on not changing these because you are wrong. Fail the article, but then you may be approached by a senior editor for failing without good reason. —

2154:

Jenna Hally Rubenstein for MTV Buzzworthy wrote that it is easy to become addicted to listening to "Let There Be Love", and that Aguilera's vocals "prevail above the noise. ----- Jenna Hally Rubenstein for MTV Buzzworthy

44: 2056:

Jim Farber for New York Daily News praised the song, writing that it "functions as a prime disco diva anthem" ---- Change to New York Daily News contributor Jim Farber hailed it "as a prime disco diva anthem".

3179:

I would be just as happy if the entire "Chart Performance" section was removed and only the table retained. Like I said, I simply kept as much of your edit as I thought reasonably fell within our guidelines.—

1544:

Upon the release of Lotus, the song debuted on the South Korea international singles chart at number 92 with digital download sales of 2,945. --- link South Korea's single chart and change 'with' with due.

2034:

Mesfin Fekadu for The Huffington Post thought that Martin's production of "Let There Be Love" was superior to "Your Body", citing it as "typical" but potentially successful on radio. ------ link Your Body

3503: 2639:"Let There Be Love” — an unbearably cute pop song that sweeps Xtina away on a wave of synths to unfamiliar Eurodance territory", it calls its a pop song. Eurodance territory doesn't mean Eurodance song. 1561:

I still don't see why "due" isn't appropriate; it charted due to those numbers. Why does it matter whether we know the exact number. Actually, your contradicting yourself; see the charts section. :/ —

1077:

rhythmically. Lyrically, it's like Katy Perry with Whitney Houston's voice. If not the third single, I am fairly confident that this has to be a single from the album. Just putting that out there... --

1007: 3407: 2869: 1174: 147: 1500:'best' and 'stand-out' are basically synonyms. Plaudit(s) is a synonym for praise, so its perfectly acceptable. Try this: "Many reviewers considered "Let There Be Love" one of the best songs on 3077:

issue dated June 1, 2013. With "Let There Be Love" attaining the number one position on the Hot Dance Club Songs chart, it upped her total tally to eight number one songs, and the second from

2777: 243: 1634:

So? Maybe you can add the composition sentences to the 2nd paragraph. Try this; "Aguilera performed the track on televised programs such as the 40th American Music Awards and The Voice." —

1793:

They are both sourced, so yes they are a part of the composition. Combines is fine here because of the magnitude of genres. You would use incorporates for one, maybe two, other genres. —

3149:

Actually, I don't particularly "advocate" my section. It just represented an effort to keep the parts of your edit that conformed to guidelines and remove only the material that did not.—

2371:

He also wrote that it was his favourite song on the album upon the initial listen, but that it would probably fall down his list after several months of play. ----- Remove entirely. Meh.

2627:

says "From the initial stabs of synth, we know this is going to be an Ibiza-type dance anthem" implying "dance music". It also mentions trance and electronica but not in proper context.

1763:

However, she felt at this point in her career with Lotus, Aguilera felt it was the right time to work together, saying: --- change saying to 'stating' or 'reflecting'. Formal prose.

970: 2402:

Annie Zaleski for The A.V. Club was critical of the song, writing that it is "faceless Top 40 EDM." --- Annie Zaleski for The A.V. Club critized the song as "faceless Top 40 EDM."

2915: 1220: 319: 300: 2449:

Aguilera also performed "Let There Be Love" with her team of aspiring singer's on The Voice, a singing competition on which she is a coach. ---- Change 'singer's' to singers.

1581:

Upon the release of Lotus, the song debuted on theSouth Korea international singles chart at number 92 with digital download sales of 2,945 ----- Something went wrong here. —

3563: 3513: 931: 522: 512: 3326:

But I never actually wrote that it's "unusual", I just said that for 4 weeks it rose one position per week, as it shows in each source. So no it's not original research. —

3533: 740: 3518: 3498: 1008:

http://www.billboard.com/new-releases/christina-aguilera-lotus-track-by-track-1008011102.story#/new-releases/christina-aguilera-lotus-track-by-track-1008011102.story

2897: 1202: 937: 3408:

https://web.archive.org/web/20131021164138/http://gaonchart.co.kr/digital_chart/index.php?nationGbn=E&current_week=47&current_year=2012&chart_Time=week

3538: 3508: 2329:

However, he criticized Aguilera vocal performance stating that her "big voice was designed to soar over monster beats like this." ---- This doesn't make sense.

488: 3103:

at number 92 during the week of November 11 to 17, 2012, with digital download sales of 2,945.< In the United States, the song debuted at number 44 on the

1717:

I meant the sentiment in general. It mainly revolves around Aguilera's sentiments and not on the song itself. I strongly urge you to condense the section. —

3568: 2887: 1192: 1091: 2778:

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/CHRISTINA-AGUILERA-LET-THERE-BE-LOVE-OFFICIAL-US-10-TRACK-PROMO-CDS-/370795194584?pt=UK_CDsDVDs_CDs_CDs_GL&hash=item56551da8d8

3528: 3411: 3381: 716: 385: 24: 3072:

at number 92 during the week of November 11 to 17, 2012, with digital download sales of 2,945. In the United States, the song debuted at number 44 on the

2982:

Two weeks later on May 4, 2013, it climbed to number five, and for the following four weeks, it rose by one position per week,<ref name="Number 5": -->

3548: 3488: 855: 845: 79: 168: 3558: 2592:

They aren't properly sourced. A quick check shows that sources use words like "beats" or "inspired" which do not make a song of a particular genre. —

1790:

Opening sentence; change combines to incorporates and dancepop to dance-pop. We don't know whether those particular genres encompass its composition.

1386:

don't know whether those particular attributes encompass its composition. In addition, remove the Usher comparisons as only one reviewer thinks this.

907: 135: 975: 479: 456: 971:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2235064/American-Music-Awards-2012-Christina-Aguilera-spills-star-spangled-bodysuit-performs-AMAs.html

3397: 1884:

This is completely about composition. It's about musical structure and comparisons, her vocals, and the lyrics. Not critical reception at all. —

370: 1047: 965: 750: 707: 684: 2216:

I read Lansky's review; He does not complimented Aguilera for not over singing and he does not describe that as "epic." Restructure sentence.

960: 85: 1520:

I don't see an issue with this, it's just your opinion of how you would write it. There's actually nothing wrong with what I've written. —

3543: 2788: 2642: 1967:

The entire section follows the same template of author-for-publication. To keep the prose fresh, I suggest using formats that I've used at

1037: 898: 878: 821: 129: 3113: 3082: 219: 1487:

I don't believe any critics called it a standout track though. Plaudits is the complete wrong word to use, I've never heard of it. —

125: 1853:

According to Kitty Empire for The Guardian, the song "about as formulaic as club pop gets" but "resonates effectively. ---- the song

3417:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1968: 2618: 1920:

bare any relevance to composition?!?! That's what composition is! What the song is composed of: the melody, lyrics, vocals etc. —

3193:

That would be even worse and would not cover the the information such as it being her 8th number one on the chart and second from

3478: 3241: 1084: 574: 175: 3523: 2980:

It broke into the top ten at number nine on April 20, 2013, after spending two months on the chart.<ref name="Number 9": -->

2892: 1197: 812: 773: 207: 99: 30: 2159:

that it is easy to become addicted to listening to "Let There Be Love", and that Aguilera's vocals "prevail above the noise.

104: 20: 3251:

How is it expansive? It's two really short sentences. Not sentence after sentence of a week by week update for 3 months. —

1548:

We know the exact amount here, so "with" is the correct word choice. If we didn't know, then yes "due" would be correct. —

2843:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1148:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2968:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2583:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1022: 390: 201: 74: 3483: 3459: 3412:

http://gaonchart.co.kr/digital_chart/index.php?nationGbn=E&current_week=47&current_year=2012&chart_Time=week

431: 141: 3553: 1241: 1079: 565: 545: 65: 2936: 557: 539: 639: 613: 976:

http://idolator.com/7289242/the-voice-christina-aguilera-performs-let-there-be-love-cassadee-pope-hits-1-on-itunes

1451:

I don't really see the point but okay. But abrasive is the complete wrong word, that makes it sound negative. —

3398:

https://web.archive.org/web/20121109120630/http://www.4music.com/news/news/6712/Review-Christina-Aguilera-Lotus

3464: 3351: 3337: 3321: 3302: 3286: 3262: 3245: 3208: 3188: 3174: 3158: 3144: 3039: 3009: 2959: 2940: 2826: 2796: 2792: 2759: 2734: 2717: 2692: 2674: 2612: 2571: 2549: 2532: 2515: 2491: 2463: 2434: 2416: 2385: 2364: 2343: 2322: 2300: 2275: 2249: 2230: 2205: 2189: 2173: 2143: 2127: 2111: 2087: 2071: 2049: 2027: 2006: 1985: 1947: 1931: 1911: 1895: 1873: 1844: 1823: 1804: 1778: 1744: 1728: 1712: 1693: 1661: 1645: 1608: 1592: 1572: 1531: 1515: 1462: 1446: 1429: 1413: 1372: 1356: 1284: 1245: 1131: 1097: 1063: 1048:

http://www.ohio.com/the330entertainment/music/review-christina-aguilera-s-lotus-is-good-but-not-great-1.349912

991: 1701:

It's already a condensed version of what it should to be. I only say rebirth once, and that's in a quote. —

966:

http://uk.eonline.com/news/364242/2012-american-music-awards-best-worst-from-the-show-plus-full-winner-s-list

3450: 3389: 2646: 109: 2782: 961:

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1695198/christina-aguilera-american-music-awards-performance-preview.jhtml

2911: 1216: 2739:

Intro should be changed to reflect that. "It is a multi-genre song" isnt very formal or encyclopaedic. —

2350:

Robert Copsey for Digital Spy thought that the song's weakness is also its strength ----- what weakness?

2235:

I did. He praises her vocal performance and then adds that she isn't over singing; there's a difference.

3434:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3035: 2822: 2755: 2713: 2670: 2608: 1618:

American Music Awards and The Voice. The current sentences are plagued with too much detail for a lead.

1127: 1038:

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/thesound/a435214/christina-aguileras-new-album-lotus-first-listen.html

437: 363: 253: 249: 189: 3401: 3388:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2624: 3197:

overall. Think about it. Just because there are two charts, doesn't mean it doesn't deserve prose. —

2990:

until it reached the top spot for the chart issue dated June 1, 2013.<ref name="US Dance Peak": -->

232: 3237: 3104: 3073: 644: 618: 2636: 3335: 3300: 3260: 3206: 3172: 3142: 3130: 3054: 3016: 2997: 2732: 2690: 2547: 2489: 2461: 2414: 2383: 2362: 2341: 2320: 2298: 2273: 2228: 2203: 2171: 2141: 2109: 2069: 2047: 2025: 2004: 1983: 1929: 1893: 1871: 1802: 1776: 1710: 1691: 1659: 1630: 1606: 1557: 1529: 1496: 1460: 1398: 1370: 1341: 1320: 1282: 1061: 989: 348: 271: 161: 55: 1329:

material for her album. --- These sentences convey the same message; merge them with less detail.

906: