Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Legal case

Source đź“ť

31: 85: 64: 95: 22: 250:
English law, the parties may also be known as the 'demandant' and 'tenant', and 'applicant' and 'respondent' or the 'claimant' and 'defendant'. I think this article should be clearly marked as being applicable only in a general sense to the US and tentatively, to other common law jurisdictions, but further discussion is needed.
249:
It is inaccurate to refer to 'legal cases' as if they only occur between opposing parties. For example, divorce proceedings can often be brought by both spouses together. Many family law proceedings occur like this. Furthermore, the terms 'plaintiff' and 'defendant' are not used universally. In
35: 374: 364: 379: 177:
Hey, there are different ways that legal cases are handled around the world. this article may need to be changed to "US legal cases" or have "US" written throughout the article.
210:
are all names for THE SAME CASE, am i right? I would appreciate knowing why the plaintiff and defendant (or respondent or petitioner) sometimes change names, or swap places.
169:
I see this : A legal case is a dispute between opposing parties resolved by a court, or by some equivalent legal process. A legal case may be either civil or criminal.
359: 369: 307:. There doesn't appear to be a consistent distinction between the two concepts, so it would be preferable to centralize our coverage in a single 147: 389: 137: 225:
There were multiple cases which were joined, all against the same person, Perry. The order of names is flipped when there is an appeal.
354: 394: 384: 44: 108: 69: 50: 21: 112:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the 327: 296: 173:
in the articles, but I have heard of some admin code procedings as quazi criminal. Can anyone comment?
258: 233: 215: 190: 178: 335: 316: 304: 279: 206:
So, why do court cases change their names? Hollingsworth v. Perry, Perry v. Schwarzenegger,
308: 252: 227: 211: 207: 348: 331: 312: 84: 63: 270: 94: 300: 100: 90: 189:
I just read the last paragraph, looks ok, I deleted the globilize template.
375:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
339: 320: 284: 263: 238: 219: 193: 181: 113: 15: 365:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Society and social sciences
380:
Start-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
202:
captioning, OR the changing face of court case names
328:WT:LAW#Legal case is in dire need of sourcing 8: 19: 326:Noting that the specific discussion is at 58: 60: 360:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles 7: 106:This article is within the scope of 116:and the subjects encompassed by it. 49:It is of interest to the following 370:Start-Class level-5 vital articles 14: 295:Following up on a discussion at 93: 83: 62: 29: 20: 142:This article has been rated as 122:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law 285:12:47, 25 September 2019 (UTC) 264:12:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC) 239:12:46, 25 September 2019 (UTC) 1: 220:00:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC) 390:Top-importance law articles 411: 355:Start-Class vital articles 321:00:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 194:02:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 182:02:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC) 148:project's importance scale 340:07:50, 16 June 2024 (UTC) 141: 78: 57: 395:WikiProject Law articles 385:Start-Class law articles 125:Template:WikiProject Law 309:broad-concept article 43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 36:level-5 vital article 299:, I propose merging 269:Added to the lede. 45:content assessment 162: 161: 158: 157: 154: 153: 402: 305:Legal proceeding 277: 130: 129: 126: 123: 120: 103: 98: 97: 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 42: 33: 32: 25: 24: 16: 410: 409: 405: 404: 403: 401: 400: 399: 345: 344: 293: 271: 247: 204: 167: 127: 124: 121: 118: 117: 109:WikiProject Law 99: 92: 72: 40: 30: 12: 11: 5: 408: 406: 398: 397: 392: 387: 382: 377: 372: 367: 362: 357: 347: 346: 343: 342: 292: 291:Merge proposal 289: 288: 287: 246: 243: 242: 241: 208:Perry v. Brown 203: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 175: 174: 166: 163: 160: 159: 156: 155: 152: 151: 144:Top-importance 140: 134: 133: 131: 105: 104: 88: 76: 75: 73:Top‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 407: 396: 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 381: 378: 376: 373: 371: 368: 366: 363: 361: 358: 356: 353: 352: 350: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 324: 323: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 290: 286: 283: 282: 278: 276: 275: 268: 267: 266: 265: 261: 260: 255: 254: 244: 240: 236: 235: 230: 229: 224: 223: 222: 221: 217: 213: 209: 201: 195: 192: 188: 187: 186: 185: 184: 183: 180: 172: 171: 170: 164: 149: 145: 139: 136: 135: 132: 115: 111: 110: 102: 96: 91: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 37: 27: 23: 18: 17: 294: 280: 273: 272: 257: 251: 248: 232: 226: 205: 176: 168: 143: 128:law articles 107: 51:WikiProjects 34: 114:legal field 41:Start-class 349:Categories 301:Legal case 253:Steepleman 245:Inaccuracy 228:Steepleman 101:Law portal 39:is rated 165:Untitled 332:Klbrain 313:Visviva 146:on the 311:. -- 297:WT:LAW 274:bd2412 47:scale. 303:into 191:Travb 179:Travb 28:This 336:talk 317:talk 216:talk 212:Mang 138:Top 119:Law 70:Law 351:: 338:) 330:. 319:) 262:) 237:) 218:) 334:( 315:( 281:T 259:t 256:( 234:t 231:( 214:( 150:. 53::

Index


level-5 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Law
WikiProject icon
icon
Law portal
WikiProject Law
legal field
Top
project's importance scale
Travb
02:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Travb
02:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Perry v. Brown
Mang
talk
00:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Steepleman
t
12:46, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Steepleman
t
12:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
bd2412
T
12:47, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑