263:". There is little on his career in Vietnam between 1966 and the 1970s. What was his standpoint in the Cold War, while being a journalist he seems to have involved himself on one side? Nothing about his work in the Dominican Republic. Not everything is understandable to the reader, for instance what made the ray piece so notable? Also, the information in the infobox should generally be present in the article text, such as place of birth, death etc.
315:
42:
241:
It is referenced, but some of the references lack much information, such as author etc. This is especially important for the books. Page numbers are preferred for books. Also, correct author information should be provided in all cases. For instance, the article from The
Namibian is written by Namibia
254:
Does it contain the major aspects of the topic? The article is pretty decent, make no mistake, but for a good article I believe the article contains a bit too little information. The bit on the Korean War is short -- mention directly that he was awarded the Heart for Korea service, if that's the
334:
Thanks for giving honest feedback. I'll be addressing these comments over the next week. I'm in university right now, and I have a busy few days ahead, but I should have some time to get on this. Again, thanks for the review.
80:
70:
47:
200:
126:
256:
75:
367:
122:
52:
167:
107:
318:
On hold. Needs a longer lead and work on citation information. Should be fleshed out to give a presentation of the person.
189:
99:
223:, it is short and does not give a summary of the topic which could stand as a consise encyclopedia entry on its own.
234:
242:
Press Agency/AP. Some references lack work/publisher -- where was the Dirck
Halstead article published? etc.
341:
323:
153:
297:
173:
204:
270:
220:
336:
115:
17:
345:
319:
148:
357:
304:
No, but this criterion is allowed to be overlooked if no apparent free image exists.
92:
219:
I have nothing special to note concerning the prose quality. Regarding to the
373:
350:
327:
194:
356:
No edits to the article in over a month, so I'm closing this.
159:
181:
259:(which should be linked to directly) writes "Leon Daniel
134:
103:
8:
30:
61:
33:
255:case, and it should be sorted out why
7:
24:
313:
314:
1:
351:06:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
374:17:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
328:19:19, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
195:19:19, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
389:
301:to illustrate the topic?
214:reasonably well written
249:broad in its coverage
289:No apparent issues.
277:No apparent issues.
369:Operation Big Bear
230:factually accurate
349:
188:
180:
172:
166:
158:
89:
88:
380:
370:
364:
343:
317:
316:
193:
186:
184:
178:
176:
170:
164:
162:
156:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
18:Talk:Leon Daniel
388:
387:
383:
382:
381:
379:
378:
377:
372:
368:
358:
182:
174:
160:
146:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
386:
384:
366:
354:
353:
331:
330:
307:
306:
305:
292:
291:
290:
280:
279:
278:
266:
265:
264:
245:
244:
243:
226:
225:
224:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
385:
376:
375:
371:
365:
363:
362:
352:
347:
344:(note: not a
342:
340:
339:
333:
332:
329:
325:
321:
311:
308:
303:
302:
300:
299:
293:
288:
287:
285:
281:
276:
275:
273:
272:
267:
262:
258:
253:
252:
250:
246:
240:
239:
237:
236:
231:
227:
222:
218:
217:
215:
211:
210:
209:
208:
206:
203:review – see
202:
197:
196:
191:
185:
177:
169:
163:
155:
151:
150:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
360:
359:
355:
338:I, Jethrobot
337:
309:
295:
283:
269:
260:
248:
233:
229:
213:
207:for criteria
199:
198:
147:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
320:Geschichte
235:verifiable
149:Geschichte
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
361:Wizardman
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
296:contain
294:Does it
205:WP:WIAGA
168:contribs
76:Criteria
310:Overall
271:neutral
161:message
127:history
108:history
94:Article
298:images
284:stable
282:Is it
268:Is it
247:Is it
228:Is it
212:Is it
190:email
175:count
136:Watch
16:<
324:talk
257:this
232:and
221:lead
183:logs
154:talk
123:edit
100:edit
346:bot
348:!)
326:)
312::
286:?
274:?
251:?
238:?
216:?
201:GA
125:|
106:|
102:|
322:(
261:s
192:)
187:•
179:•
171:•
165:•
157:•
152:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.