612:
528:
508:
487:
413:
388:
365:
349:
324:
274:
262:
231:
195:
42:
279:
A small query - I can't access Ware & Braukman other than a tiny snippet view but I found "Notable Women in the
Physical Sciences: A Biographical Dictionary" (Shearer & Shearer, 1997) p. 239 says: "earned her B.S. degree in chemistry from the University of Chicago in 1938 when she was only 19
580:
I hadn't noticed that - it was there before I started the expansion. It seems very credible. Years of reading obituaries have accustomed me to mentally substituting "cancer" for "after a long illness", but I don't have an explicit source, and I don't know where the other editor got it from. So I've
564:
After a quick pass, I don't see any issues. (I haven't drilled down into the sources, though.) The only small point I'd mention, which isn't at all relevant for the GA criteria, is that the "cancer deaths" category doesn't appear supported by the article text. Hawkeye, thanks as always for your
418:
I was just about to change the spelling of 'skeptical' to 'sceptical' when I noticed another editor had literally just minutes before changed it to 'skeptical'. My own preference is 'sceptical' but I will leave it as is so I'm not 'edit warring!'
166:
Okay, this looks like one that might be within my (limited) capabilities to review. However, I'll probably get someone else with more GAN review experience to briefly double check/comment once I've had a go at
422:
I'm not sure... my spell checker is set to
Australian English and will change it to "sceptical" if it gets a chance, but perhaps "skeptical" is the American spelling?
80:
70:
47:
477:
225:
595:
Especially for someone who worked that much around radioactive materials, it's easy to believe. Just thought I'd point it out either way. --
126:
156:
609:
Thanks for your help as always, Khazar2! Now I've just got to work out how to go through all the next steps to finish processing this
173:
122:
52:
283:
I presume this was an error. Ware & Braukman say chemistry, as does Leona herself in her book, which I regard as definitive.
107:
75:
318:
99:
481:
498:
205:
469:
441:
623:
542:
473:
297:
248:
150:
407:
437:
615:
586:
534:
427:
289:
146:
600:
570:
461:
359:
256:
213:
115:
17:
343:
177:
378:
209:
582:
502:
423:
221:
217:
596:
566:
280:
years old." which backs up the Ware & Braukman. NNDB (ref #1) states
Physics?
611:
92:
630:
604:
590:
574:
549:
445:
431:
304:
160:
533:
A very interesting article about a fascinating character.
134:
103:
271:B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
565:consistently excellent work on this topic! --
8:
497:B. Images are provided if possible and are
436:Yes, "skeptical" is the US spelling. See
30:
61:
33:
288:Thanks for sorting/clarifying those.
7:
385:Fair representation without bias:
24:
610:
526:
506:
485:
411:
386:
363:
347:
322:
272:
260:
229:
193:
1:
257:appropriate reference section
527:
507:
486:
412:
387:
364:
348:
323:
273:
261:
230:
194:
651:
631:08:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
605:21:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
591:21:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
575:18:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
550:08:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
446:20:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
432:21:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
305:08:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
161:13:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
478:valid fair use rationales
465:to illustrate the topic?
501:to the topic, and have
187:reasonably well written
560:Requested double-check
492:Both images are US PD
337:broad in its coverage
319:No original research
244:factually accurate
192:A. Prose quality:
503:suitable captions
480:are provided for
89:
88:
642:
628:
620:
619:
614:
547:
539:
538:
530:
529:
510:
509:
489:
488:
482:non-free content
474:copyright status
415:
414:
390:
389:
367:
366:
351:
350:
326:
325:
302:
294:
293:
276:
275:
264:
263:
233:
232:
197:
196:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
18:Talk:Leona Woods
650:
649:
645:
644:
643:
641:
640:
639:
624:
617:
616:
562:
543:
536:
535:
298:
291:
290:
208:compliance for
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
648:
646:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
561:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
525:Pass or Fail:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
495:
494:
493:
468:A. Images are
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
438:Cyberherbalist
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
356:
355:
354:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
269:
268:
267:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
218:words to watch
202:
201:
200:
171:
169:
168:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
647:
632:
629:
627:
621:
618:SagaciousPhil
613:
608:
607:
606:
602:
598:
594:
593:
592:
588:
584:
579:
578:
577:
576:
572:
568:
559:
551:
548:
546:
540:
537:SagaciousPhil
532:
531:
524:
523:
521:
518:
512:
511:
504:
500:
496:
491:
490:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
466:
464:
463:
457:
447:
443:
439:
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
421:
420:
417:
416:
409:
405:
404:
402:
398:
392:
391:
384:
383:
381:
380:
375:
369:
368:
361:
357:
353:
352:
345:
344:Major aspects
341:
340:
338:
334:
328:
327:
320:
316:
306:
303:
301:
295:
292:SagaciousPhil
287:
286:
285:
284:
282:
281:
278:
277:
270:
266:
265:
258:
254:
253:
251:
250:
245:
241:
235:
234:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:
191:
190:
188:
184:
183:
182:
181:
179:
176:review – see
175:
165:
164:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
147:Sagaciousphil
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
625:
581:removed it.
563:
544:
519:
459:
400:
377:
336:
299:
247:
243:
186:
180:for criteria
172:
170:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
472:with their
104:visual edit
255:A. Has an
249:verifiable
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
408:edit wars
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
583:Hawkeye7
499:relevant
460:contain
458:Does it
424:Hawkeye7
178:WP:WIAGA
157:contribs
76:Criteria
597:Khazar2
567:Khazar2
520:Overall
410:, etc:
379:neutral
360:Focused
222:fiction
127:history
108:history
94:Article
476:, and
470:tagged
462:images
401:stable
399:Is it
376:Is it
335:Is it
242:Is it
224:, and
214:layout
185:Is it
226:lists
136:Watch
16:<
626:Chat
601:talk
587:talk
571:talk
545:Chat
442:talk
428:talk
300:Chat
246:and
210:lead
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
406:No
358:B.
342:A.
317:C.
206:MoS
204:B.
167:it.
622:-
603:)
589:)
573:)
541:-
522::
505::
484::
444:)
430:)
403:?
382:?
362::
346::
339:?
321::
296:-
259::
252:?
228::
220:,
216:,
212:,
189:?
174:GA
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
599:(
585:(
569:(
440:(
426:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.