342:
234:
216:
332:
314:
475:
120:
95:
64:
423:
244:
182:
437:
412:
106:
1290:
subject was caught doming something illegal or wrong. Fundamentally, a photo of someone in prison garb (whether a mugshot or otherwise) has undue weight, which is why other editors and admins here disagree with your narrow interpretation of "context" (and seeming lack of comprehension of the applicability of "false or disparaging").
130:
967:
As mentioned previously, the consensus of (the small number of) editors and administrators who have reviewed the situation is that your interpretation is outside of the mainstream. If you wish to solicit broader views, please do so. Your statement that "a mugshot only indicates that the person is
1289:
A mugshot depicts someone as a criminal, and intentionally does so—it's as simple and as obvious as that. You can tell from all kinds of reporting and other uses of mugshots and simulated mugshots that this is the case. For example, photoshopped or posed mugshots used humorously suggest that the
854:
Neo-Jay, your interpretation of WP:MUG is rather narrow, and I would think not within the mainstream. I don't see how the plain language of the policy distinguishes between the use of that photo in an infobox versus elsewhere in the article (and if you think it's because of the phrase "out of
1239:
should be interpreted as not including the mugshot in the relevant section in this article. And no other editor has explained why using a mugshot, which does not indicate that the person is charged or convicted, in the relevant section presents a person in a false or disparaging light.
1061:
that it is. As I have recommended before (this is the third time), if you want to test the hypothesis, there are places to do it. Here, your view has been rejected. By all means, solicit wider input at the appropriate forum. This is my last comment on this in the current setting per
1357:. I don't see any problem with that. Do you? If a person is arrested by the police and then found completely innocent by the court, using this person's mugshot is not claiming that this person is a bad guy and should have been convicted, but is only revealing the (unfortunate)
746:, let alone convicted of one. As the only free image we have, it can't be used anywhere in the article at the moment. It has been nominated for deletion at Commons, but it will be kept there because most Commons editors couldn't give a **** about whether we
904:
only indicates the person is arrested, and does not indicate that he or she is convicted or charged. So using a mugshot for a person who is arrested and not convicted or charged does not present a person in a false or disparaging light, and does not violate
829:
Images of living persons should not be used out of context to present a person in a false or disparaging light. This is particularly important for police booking photographs (mugshots), or situations where the subject did not expect to be
855:
context", I think you're missing the import of that phrase in the context of the policy—it appears to me to refer to the context of the photograph, not the context of the photograph within the article). The nascent discussion of this at
701:
It is clearly disparaging under any circumstances and anywhere in the article. In my view, it likewise presents the person in a false light until and unless he is convicted. Fortunately, the photo has been blacklisted for now.
1517:
1381:
by using this mugshot? Knowledge is an online encyclopedia of knowledge, not a parody website for humorous purpose. Using a mugshot in
Knowledge should be like using it in serious news media. So those "
1039:? If the statement that "a mugshot indicates that the person is convicted" is an assertion about what happens inside the heads of people other than yourself, I think it is an inaccurate assertion. --
1497:
290:
677:
Accordingly, the mugshot does not belong in the infobox, where it is "out of context". However, I don't see a problem with including it in the relevant section of the article. Thoughts?
448:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
43:
1512:
1492:
1482:
388:
636:
1213:
while nobody has come forward to support you. There's no new discussion just back and forth that could be summarized as "no, you." But it's pretty clear the mug shot
840:
might be interpreted that the mugshot of Liu
Qiangdong cannot be used in infobox, but it does not mean that the mugshot cannot be used in the relevant section. --
567:
563:
549:
1532:
1472:
48:
1507:
449:
444:
417:
31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
742:
I blacklisted it because we don't put mugshots of living people in articles unless it's relevant to the article. In this case, it's not, because Liu has
1374:
1091:
that your view is the mainstream. I do not have to go to other places to achieve consensus. The consensus can be achieved here. Although administrator
1274:
No, you did not. No one did. It would be great if you could explain why you think that a mugshot indicates that the person is convicted or charged. --
296:
968:
arrested" is an assertion about what what happens inside the heads of people other than yourself, and I think it is an inaccurate assertion at that.
1487:
1477:
148:
23:
1502:
394:
1095:
seems to blacklist the mugshot for now, I don't think that the decision is the final judgment and should block any further discussion here. --
152:
933:), i.e., the mugshot, can also be included in the place where the text is, i.e., the relevant section, because the photo reveals the same
1522:
938:
266:
1195:
is relevant here? And on what ground do you think that "consensus disagrees with inclusion of this image on this page at this time"? --
156:
1537:
1527:
1350:
545:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1231:
Well, two different editors (including me) think that the mugshot can be included in the relevant section. And achieving consensus
147:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
1322:
1304:
1072:
974:
873:
708:
364:
1165:? You need to put yours down. Nothing good comes of attempting to win content disputes by exhausting the opposition, trust me.
942:
143:
100:
1370:
257:
221:
1057:
that my view is the mainstream is correct, and one that I agree with. All I'm saying is that the limited evidence so far
1454:
644:
610:
75:
493:
355:
319:
629:
363:
related articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
198:
1346:
1235:. You, as one of the three editors you mentioned above, unfortunately have not provided any specific reason why
566:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1362:
675:
Images of living persons should not be used out of context to present a person in a false or disparaging light.
1333:
Unfortunately you misunderstand and misinterpret the meaning of a mugshot, which is taken after the person is
63:
535:
1450:
640:
601:
527:
32:
1443:
265:
articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
523:
585:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
573:
81:
526:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
422:
1318:
1300:
1068:
970:
869:
755:
704:
105:
42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
1209:
Three different editors have come up to you and explained why your inclusion is inappropriate under
1265:
1222:
1170:
1137:
864:
815:
1217:
be included on the page, so it's all kind of just wasting people's time to keep arguing about it.
233:
215:
860:
726:
684:
46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
570:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1439:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
586:
1406:
1279:
1245:
1200:
1152:
1100:
1044:
958:
845:
793:
331:
313:
135:
1361:
that he or she has once been (wrongly) arrested. It is obvious that the news reports using
593:
1313:
1192:
1180:
1162:
1129:
1092:
1063:
660:
487:
249:
39:
1312:
Naively thought the explicit request for explanation was sincere. Bowing out (again) per
1130:
to accept that consensus disagrees with inclusion of this image on this page at this time
1013:
625:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
1261:
1257:
1232:
1218:
1166:
1133:
1017:
856:
811:
552:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1377:, etc.). How could a reasonable person think that those news reports present Liu in a
592:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1466:
1342:
1236:
1210:
950:
906:
893:
885:
837:
824:
807:
803:
767:
731:
721:
689:
679:
670:
519:
1402:
1275:
1241:
1196:
1148:
1096:
1040:
954:
841:
789:
664:
347:
859:
supports my interpretation. You could investigate this further with an inquiry at
1035:. How can a reasonable person think that a mugshot indicates that this person is
1449:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
1256:
To the contrary, we provided clear policy reasons why to exclude the photo, you
559:
119:
94:
1401:. If the text can be included, so can the mugshot (in the relevant section).--
1009:
558:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
483:
474:
337:
239:
125:
1294:
this is the case is a question for sociologists or psychologists. But the
941:
for a person who is not primarily famous for his or her arrest would give
536:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140831000018/http://hurun.net/EN/HuList.aspx
243:
181:
1369:, and do not depict him as a criminal or intentionally do so (see, e.g.,
994:
262:
1435:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
1028:
901:
1458:
1410:
1385:" are not relevant here. As I put above, the mugshot reveals the same
1328:
1283:
1269:
1249:
1226:
1204:
1174:
1156:
1141:
1104:
1078:
1048:
980:
962:
879:
849:
832:" It does not prohibit using mugshots, but only prohibits using them "
819:
797:
758:
737:
714:
695:
648:
615:
436:
411:
155:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1389:
as the relevant text in the
Knowledge article, which is about the
834:
out of context to present a person in a false or disparaging light
539:
360:
621:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
989:
editors and administrators cannot be automatically seen as the
669:
Should Liu's mugshot be included in this article? According to
999:
photographic portrait of a person ... taken after a person is
57:
38:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
15:
896:
states that images of living persons should not be used to "
473:
180:
1027:). I don't think that any English dictionary would define "
530:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1518:
Start-Class China-related articles of
Unknown-importance
921:) can be included in the article, the "photo" about the
1354:
1184:
998:
785:
781:
482:
This article was accepted on 12 June 2014 by reviewer
1355:
relevant section of
Knowledge article "O. J. Simpson"
1018:
photograph ... taken in conjunction with somebody's
359:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
261:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1298:that this is the case seems to be obvious to most.
562:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
393:This article has not yet received a rating on the
295:This article has not yet received a rating on the
788:). I also don't see any problem with doing so. --
1498:Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
898:present a person in a false or disparaging light
1383:photoshopped or posed mugshots used humorously
635:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
548:This message was posted before February 2018.
1183:, and I don't think that the discussion here
8:
1053:Your point that the evidence so far doesn't
458:Knowledge:WikiProject Articles for creation
61:
518:I have just modified one external link on
461:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation
442:This article was reviewed by member(s) of
406:
308:
210:
89:
1513:Unknown-importance China-related articles
1493:Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
1483:Knowledge requested photographs of people
408:
310:
212:
91:
1337:and does not mean that he or she is a
884:Bongomatic, is your interpretation of
674:
7:
1533:AfC submissions by date/12 June 2014
945:to the article, and is, IMHO, what "
888:that the mugshot should not be used
744:never even been charged with a crime
353:This article is within the scope of
255:This article is within the scope of
141:This article is within the scope of
1473:Biography articles of living people
867:if you want to solicit more views.
80:It is of interest to the following
1508:Start-Class China-related articles
810:so probably best to leave it out.
14:
1031:" as a photo for a person who is
522:. Please take a moment to review
445:WikiProject Articles for creation
937:as the text. Using a mugshot in
890:until and unless he is convicted
435:
421:
410:
340:
330:
312:
242:
232:
214:
189:An editor has requested that an
128:
118:
104:
93:
62:
21:This article must adhere to the
540:http://hurun.net/EN/HuList.aspx
165:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
1488:WikiProject Biography articles
1478:Start-Class biography articles
1411:03:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
1329:04:41, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
1310:00:18, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
1284:16:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1270:16:07, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1250:15:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1227:14:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1205:14:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1175:14:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1157:14:38, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1142:14:36, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1105:13:12, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1079:12:53, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
1049:12:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
981:11:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
963:07:31, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
880:17:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
850:16:45, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
820:14:49, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
798:05:56, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
759:18:22, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
750:display something, only if we
738:05:39, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
715:05:00, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
696:04:08, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
275:Knowledge:WikiProject Business
168:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1503:WikiProject Business articles
1128:I'd suggest it might be time
719:Sorry, blacklisted when/how?
649:18:06, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
367:and see a list of open tasks.
281:WikiProject Business articles
278:Template:WikiProject Business
269:and see a list of open tasks.
24:biographies of living persons
153:contribute to the discussion
1459:23:52, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
772:I added the mugshot to the
616:01:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
373:Knowledge:WikiProject China
36:must be removed immediately
1554:
1523:WikiProject China articles
1379:false or disparaging light
909:. If the "text" about the
579:(last update: 5 June 2024)
515:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
395:project's importance scale
376:Template:WikiProject China
297:project's importance scale
1187:has come to a natural end
481:
430:
392:
325:
294:
227:
188:
113:
88:
1538:Accepted AfC submissions
1528:Start-Class AfC articles
1345:was found not guilty in
892:? The plain language of
1363:Liu Qiangdong's mugshot
1083:I don't think that the
511:External links modified
1365:only say that Liu was
1191:Why do you think that
478:
379:China-related articles
185:
70:This article is rated
993:. Knowledge defines "
477:
455:Articles for creation
452:for more information.
418:Articles for creation
184:
144:WikiProject Biography
806:it's a violation of
630:B-liu-a-20180904.jpg
560:regular verification
258:WikiProject Business
1258:chose not to listen
947:used out of context
550:After February 2018
1451:Community Tech bot
1087:evidence can even
641:Community Tech bot
604:InternetArchiveBot
555:InternetArchiveBot
479:
186:
171:biography articles
76:content assessment
1327:
1320:
1309:
1302:
1077:
1070:
985:The opinion of a
979:
972:
878:
871:
836:". In this case,
756:Black Kite (talk)
713:
706:
580:
508:
507:
504:
503:
500:
499:
405:
404:
401:
400:
356:WikiProject China
307:
306:
303:
302:
209:
208:
205:
204:
56:
55:
1545:
1321:
1317:
1303:
1299:
1071:
1067:
973:
969:
872:
868:
802:As mentioned on
774:relevant section
771:
734:
729:
724:
707:
703:
692:
687:
682:
668:
614:
605:
578:
577:
556:
466:
465:
462:
459:
456:
439:
432:
431:
426:
425:
424:
414:
407:
381:
380:
377:
374:
371:
350:
345:
344:
343:
334:
327:
326:
316:
309:
283:
282:
279:
276:
273:
252:
247:
246:
236:
229:
228:
218:
211:
201:to this article.
173:
172:
169:
166:
163:
149:join the project
138:
136:Biography portal
133:
132:
131:
122:
115:
114:
109:
108:
107:
97:
90:
73:
67:
66:
58:
44:this noticeboard
16:
1553:
1552:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1463:
1462:
1444:Richard Liu.jpg
1437:
1353:is used in the
1347:his murder case
1325:
1307:
1075:
987:small number of
977:
876:
765:
732:
727:
722:
711:
690:
685:
680:
658:
656:
637:nomination page
623:
608:
603:
571:
564:have permission
554:
528:this simple FaQ
513:
463:
460:
457:
454:
453:
420:
378:
375:
372:
369:
368:
346:
341:
339:
280:
277:
274:
271:
270:
250:Business portal
248:
241:
170:
167:
164:
161:
160:
134:
129:
127:
103:
74:on Knowledge's
71:
12:
11:
5:
1551:
1549:
1541:
1540:
1535:
1530:
1525:
1520:
1515:
1510:
1505:
1500:
1495:
1490:
1485:
1480:
1475:
1465:
1464:
1447:
1446:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1375:FoxNews report
1323:
1305:
1161:Have you read
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1073:
1012:also defines "
975:
874:
763:
762:
761:
709:
655:
652:
633:
632:
622:
619:
598:
597:
590:
543:
542:
534:Added archive
512:
509:
506:
505:
502:
501:
498:
497:
480:
470:
469:
467:
440:
428:
427:
415:
403:
402:
399:
398:
391:
385:
384:
382:
365:the discussion
352:
351:
335:
323:
322:
317:
305:
304:
301:
300:
293:
287:
286:
284:
267:the discussion
254:
253:
237:
225:
224:
219:
207:
206:
203:
202:
187:
177:
176:
174:
140:
139:
123:
111:
110:
98:
86:
85:
79:
68:
54:
53:
49:this help page
33:poorly sourced
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1550:
1539:
1536:
1534:
1531:
1529:
1526:
1524:
1521:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1506:
1504:
1501:
1499:
1496:
1494:
1491:
1489:
1486:
1484:
1481:
1479:
1476:
1474:
1471:
1470:
1468:
1461:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1445:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1434:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1343:O. J. Simpson
1340:
1336:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1326:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1308:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1238:
1234:
1233:is not voting
1230:
1229:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1188:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1002:
996:
992:
988:
984:
983:
982:
978:
971:
966:
965:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
903:
899:
895:
891:
887:
883:
882:
881:
877:
870:
866:
862:
858:
853:
852:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:photographed.
826:
823:
822:
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
800:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
769:
764:
760:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
740:
739:
736:
735:
730:
725:
718:
717:
716:
712:
705:
700:
699:
698:
697:
694:
693:
688:
683:
676:
672:
666:
662:
653:
651:
650:
646:
642:
638:
631:
628:
627:
626:
620:
618:
617:
612:
607:
606:
595:
591:
588:
584:
583:
582:
575:
569:
565:
561:
557:
551:
546:
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
529:
525:
521:
520:Liu Qiangdong
516:
510:
495:
492:
489:
485:
476:
472:
471:
468:
451:
447:
446:
441:
438:
434:
433:
429:
419:
416:
413:
409:
396:
390:
387:
386:
383:
366:
362:
358:
357:
349:
338:
336:
333:
329:
328:
324:
321:
318:
315:
311:
298:
292:
289:
288:
285:
268:
264:
260:
259:
251:
245:
240:
238:
235:
231:
230:
226:
223:
220:
217:
213:
200:
196:
192:
183:
179:
178:
175:
158:
157:documentation
154:
150:
146:
145:
137:
126:
124:
121:
117:
116:
112:
102:
99:
96:
92:
87:
83:
77:
69:
65:
60:
59:
51:
50:
45:
41:
37:
34:
30:
26:
25:
20:
18:
17:
1448:
1438:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1366:
1358:
1338:
1334:
1295:
1291:
1288:
1214:
1186:
1179:I have read
1127:
1088:
1084:
1058:
1054:
1036:
1032:
1024:
1019:
1005:
1000:
990:
986:
946:
943:undue weight
934:
930:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
897:
889:
833:
828:
777:
773:
751:
747:
743:
720:
678:
657:
634:
624:
602:
599:
574:source check
553:
547:
544:
517:
514:
490:
464:AfC articles
450:project page
443:
354:
348:China portal
256:
194:
190:
142:
82:WikiProjects
47:
35:
28:
22:
1351:his mugshot
72:Start-class
1467:Categories
1395:conviction
1371:CNN report
1093:Black Kite
1025:conviction
1010:Wiktionary
991:mainstream
927:conviction
915:conviction
661:Bongomatic
611:Report bug
195:photograph
1262:Simonm223
1219:Simonm223
1167:Simonm223
1134:Simonm223
1037:convicted
1033:convicted
1006:convicted
812:Simonm223
780:) twice (
594:this tool
587:this tool
162:Biography
101:Biography
40:libellous
1367:arrested
1339:criminal
1335:arrested
1314:WP:STICK
1193:WP:STICK
1181:WP:STICK
1163:WP:STICK
1064:WP:STICK
1059:suggests
1014:mug shot
1001:arrested
995:mug shot
953:means.--
768:Audacity
600:Cheers.—
494:contribs
272:Business
263:business
222:Business
1403:Neo-Jay
1276:Neo-Jay
1242:Neo-Jay
1197:Neo-Jay
1149:Neo-Jay
1147:Why? --
1097:Neo-Jay
1089:suggest
1085:limited
1041:Neo-Jay
1029:mugshot
1016:" as a
997:" as a
955:Neo-Jay
939:infobox
902:mugshot
865:WT:NPOV
857:WP:BLPN
842:Neo-Jay
790:Neo-Jay
778:infobox
665:Neo-Jay
654:Mugshot
524:my edit
1399:charge
1393:, not
1391:arrest
1349:, but
1237:WP:MUG
1211:WP:MUG
1020:arrest
951:WP:MUG
931:charge
923:arrest
919:charge
911:arrest
907:WP:MUG
894:WP:MUG
886:WP:MUG
861:WT:BLP
838:WP:MUG
825:WP:MUG
808:WP:MUG
804:WP:BLP
748:should
671:WP:MUG
78:scale.
1324:matic
1306:matic
1215:won't
1074:matic
1055:prove
1023:(not
1004:(not
976:matic
949:" in
925:(not
913:(not
900:". A
875:matic
776:(not
710:matic
484:Samee
370:China
361:China
320:China
199:added
191:image
1455:talk
1407:talk
1387:fact
1359:fact
1296:fact
1280:talk
1266:talk
1246:talk
1223:talk
1201:talk
1171:talk
1153:talk
1138:talk
1101:talk
1045:talk
959:talk
935:fact
846:talk
816:talk
794:talk
786:this
784:and
782:this
733:cιτγ
691:cιτγ
663:and
645:talk
488:talk
151:and
1397:or
1292:Why
1008:).
929:or
917:or
863:or
827:: "
752:can
723:Λυδ
681:Λυδ
639:. —
568:RfC
538:to
389:???
291:???
197:be
193:or
29:BLP
1469::
1457:)
1409:)
1373:,
1341:.
1316:.
1282:)
1268:)
1260:.
1248:)
1240:--
1225:)
1203:)
1189:".
1173:)
1155:)
1140:)
1132:.
1103:)
1066:.
1047:)
961:)
848:)
818:)
796:)
754:.
673:,
647:)
581:.
576:}}
572:{{
496:).
1453:(
1405:(
1278:(
1264:(
1244:(
1221:(
1199:(
1185:"
1169:(
1151:(
1136:(
1099:(
1043:(
957:(
844:(
814:(
792:(
770::
766:@
728:α
686:α
667::
659:@
643:(
613:)
609:(
596:.
589:.
491:·
486:(
397:.
299:.
159:.
84::
52:.
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
