653:"To readers who know linear algebra..." - the assumption is that they do, but again, this is a topic of interest for a vast number of people who wouldn't be familiar with LA-notation. I also disagree with your statement that removing LA notation would not accurately reflect reliable sources, because there are plenty of sources including high-school textbooks and statistics books written for the humanities which do not assume a background in linear algebra, but still cover least squares (and many other topics which I indicated should not be in LA-notation). Many, many books cover the topics with just index-notation (which is taught in high-school and non-STEM university mathematics), even(!) tabular calculations. I am not suggesting that tables be employed, just that articles which may be of use and interest to an audience (e.g. likely those with high-school mathematics/non-STEM math university education), be accessible to them based on their background. However, knowing from other discussions on math pages how many orders of magnitude more an article's pedantic accuracy is more important than readability and accessibility for the mathematics contributors and editors, I highly doubt any mathematics-related wikipedia article will be left without LA or set-builder notation - the dearth of them should actually indicate there is a problem because every article ends up reading like a university-level mathematics textbook, despite the claim that wikipedia is not a textbook!
572:
formulation and statistics involving terms like homoscedasticity in the first paragraph and it doesn't get easier from there. Everyone who does not know what least squares is will find this article useless. This problem is rampant in
Knowledge. It would be a lot better if Mathematicians refrained from editing articles until they make an effort to express things in high school algebra, and not make things so perfectly precise and complete that no one understands it except graduate-level experts editing it, trying to one-up each other. Their proof of superiority to prevent future edits is to make sure no one wanting to make it intelligible is unable to prove the alien language is in error. Lack of edits is not proof it's finally perfectly correct, but proof no one understand it.
609:
2nd/3rd year, and quite often is not used extensively in practising fields of engineering/CS (aside from R&D/academia). This makes articles in LA notation inaccessible to any student in high school, or from the humanities who would likely have only studied elementary matrix operations, if at all. I understand wikipedia is not a textbook, but it is an encyclopedia, and I remember pouring over hardcover
Encyclopedia Britannica back when I was a teenager in school as a good source of information which I could easily follow.
298:
277:
397:
387:
366:
215:
477:
246:
608:
I agree with this. Actually, I would propose that ALL linear algebra notation be removed from math articles on non-advanced topics that would be of interest for general users, simply because LA notation is not taught as a course in universities unless you are in STEM fields, that too until you are in
731:
It's possible that some of these generalisations could be motivated more pictorially, but linear algebra rapidly becomes essential -- numerical solvers will at the very least require loading up matrices; while understanding the different solution algorithms and their different pros and cons I would
767:
But reading even the referenced sections, I see there is a lot of repetition and content overlap - sometimes within the same section. It may not be immediately apparent (especially to readers who aren't as familiar with the concept), because although this same concept is studied in
Statistics and
571:
Imagine you're a high school student or undergrad engineer who came to this article to learn how do a least squares calculation so that you can understand it. You want to see some math that simply explains it instead of reading a lot of text. Instead, you're presented only with a linear algebra
794:
Yes, I agree that this article could benefit from some cleaning up. I think that it has been accruing cruft from editors of various viewpoints for a bit too long. If the length could decrease while still covering all of the important content, then that would be a good thing. :)
778:
Also, I hope frequent editors of this article aren't concerned if the article size reduces a bit. I spent most of last year TA-ing two undergraduate courses (Statistics for ML and Linear
Algebra + Multi-variable calc) so I'll explain the bigger edits in detail.
682:
Thanks for your input (although I think that you've misunderstood some of my statements). I will work on moving the example higher in the text. I will try to craft a presentation that doesn't use linear algebra, before the presentation that does.
482:
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied
Knowledge rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
153:
768:
Linear
Algebra (starting from high school level classes) - the notations and terminologies are very different. For instance, the first and third paragraphs in the Discussion section are saying the exact same thing.
635:
But this does not mean that the entire article should require linear algebra. Math articles work best when they begin with an elementary treatment, just as you say, and then move on to the harder stuff.
631:
often present linear least squares in linear algebra notation. To remove linear algebra entirely would mean that we do not accurately reflect reliable sources and do not serve those readers well. It's a
657:
610:
348:
537:
453:
536:
redirects here, but this page never quite defines the normal equations in full generality, just for a 2 variable example. This is completely standard stuff and really should be added!
147:
771:
I'm not the most bold editor but I'm going to try my best to clean up the redundant info here and add some verifiable sources, and would appreciate if fellow editors helped
206:
489:
Non-linear least squares: Least squares, nonlinear regression, linear least squares, errors and residuals in statistics, gradient, Gauss-Newton
Algorithm, parabola
824:
338:
44:
839:
443:
79:
591:. And part of the problem is that writing technical material for audiences at varying levels is difficult and time-consuming. But your complaint stands.
829:
419:
834:
627:
To readers who know linear algebra, linear least squares is vastly simpler in linear algebra notation than in other notation. That's why the
588:
314:
85:
819:
202:
198:
194:
190:
661:
614:
541:
514:
410:
371:
168:
305:
282:
135:
551:
I noticed that too. It seems to be lacking a basic introduction to the concept of finding the least squares solution to Ax = b.
720:
Also, it's perhaps worth flagging that most readers looking for a first article on least squares should probably be heading to
99:
30:
104:
20:
74:
784:
639:
What do you think of the
Example section of this article? Is it accessible? What if we moved it earlier in the article?
594:
What do you think of the
Example section of this article? Is it accessible? What if we moved it earlier in the article?
556:
257:
129:
65:
628:
214:
185:
125:
225:
780:
552:
175:
109:
587:
I agree that many math-related
Knowledge articles are difficult to understand. Part of the problem is that
725:
263:
396:
297:
276:
761:
24:
245:
717:
readable if the example is moved further up -- it currently sits well as a self-contained appendix.
161:
55:
418:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
313:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
141:
772:
402:
230:
70:
386:
365:
573:
511:
504:
51:
800:
737:
688:
644:
599:
227:
577:
813:
721:
732:
think is necessarily going to involve some core linear algebra however you cut it.
796:
764:, and as I said in my edit message, I intend to add some refs myself this week.
733:
684:
640:
595:
415:
229:
804:
788:
741:
692:
665:
648:
618:
603:
581:
560:
545:
476:
392:
310:
728:
rather than this article, which is more focussed on generalisations of OLS.
507:
775:
the article and suggest any improvements or citations as they see fit.
656:
The example is accessible and should be at the beginning of the page.
760:
I just added an unreferenced section template under the section
471:
239:
231:
15:
160:
414:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
309:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
567:Problem with mathematicians editing Knowledge
174:
8:
495:
360:
271:
658:2405:6E00:2F8A:7000:343C:362D:8785:4E87
611:2405:6E00:2F8A:7000:343C:362D:8785:4E87
362:
273:
243:
589:Knowledge:Knowledge is not a textbook
7:
538:2601:281:8200:36:D6A0:25B0:7C03:7A6E
408:This article is within the scope of
303:This article is within the scope of
825:High-importance Statistics articles
262:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
840:Mid-priority mathematics articles
713:IMO the article will become even
428:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
756:Starting to clean up the article
475:
431:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
395:
385:
364:
323:Knowledge:WikiProject Statistics
296:
275:
244:
213:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
830:WikiProject Statistics articles
762:Linear least squares#Discussion
448:This article has been rated as
343:This article has been rated as
326:Template:WikiProject Statistics
805:20:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
789:19:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
561:01:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
422:and see a list of open tasks.
317:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
835:B-Class mathematics articles
604:12:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
582:11:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
546:05:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
820:B-Class Statistics articles
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
856:
742:21:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
693:18:38, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
666:10:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
649:03:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
629:Knowledge:Reliable sources
619:02:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
447:
380:
342:
291:
270:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
454:project's priority scale
491:, Betascript Publishing
487:Surhone, L. M. (2009),
411:WikiProject Mathematics
726:Ordinary least squares
306:WikiProject Statistics
252:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
207:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
434:mathematics articles
105:No original research
25:Linear least squares
499:Additional comments
329:Statistics articles
781:AradhanaChatterjee
553:The-erinaceous-one
403:Mathematics portal
258:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
525:
524:
521:
520:
468:
467:
464:
463:
460:
459:
359:
358:
355:
354:
238:
237:
66:Assume good faith
43:
847:
534:normal equations
528:Normal equations
496:
492:
479:
472:
436:
435:
432:
429:
426:
405:
400:
399:
389:
382:
381:
376:
368:
361:
349:importance scale
331:
330:
327:
324:
321:
300:
293:
292:
287:
279:
272:
255:
249:
248:
240:
232:
218:
217:
208:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
855:
854:
850:
849:
848:
846:
845:
844:
810:
809:
758:
569:
530:
486:
433:
430:
427:
424:
423:
401:
394:
374:
345:High-importance
328:
325:
322:
319:
318:
286:High‑importance
285:
256:on Knowledge's
253:
234:
233:
228:
205:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
853:
851:
843:
842:
837:
832:
827:
822:
812:
811:
808:
807:
757:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
729:
718:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
654:
637:
633:
622:
621:
606:
592:
568:
565:
564:
563:
529:
526:
523:
522:
519:
518:
501:
500:
494:
493:
480:
466:
465:
462:
461:
458:
457:
446:
440:
439:
437:
420:the discussion
407:
406:
390:
378:
377:
369:
357:
356:
353:
352:
341:
335:
334:
332:
315:the discussion
301:
289:
288:
280:
268:
267:
261:
250:
236:
235:
226:
224:
223:
220:
219:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
852:
841:
838:
836:
833:
831:
828:
826:
823:
821:
818:
817:
815:
806:
802:
798:
793:
792:
791:
790:
786:
782:
776:
774:
769:
765:
763:
755:
743:
739:
735:
730:
727:
723:
722:Least squares
719:
716:
712:
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
694:
690:
686:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
667:
663:
659:
655:
652:
651:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
625:
624:
623:
620:
616:
612:
607:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
586:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
549:
548:
547:
543:
539:
535:
527:
516:
515:9786130332143
513:
509:
506:
503:
502:
498:
497:
490:
485:
484:
481:
478:
474:
473:
470:
455:
451:
445:
442:
441:
438:
421:
417:
413:
412:
404:
398:
393:
391:
388:
384:
383:
379:
373:
370:
367:
363:
350:
346:
340:
337:
336:
333:
316:
312:
308:
307:
302:
299:
295:
294:
290:
284:
281:
278:
274:
269:
265:
259:
251:
247:
242:
241:
222:
221:
216:
212:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
777:
770:
766:
759:
714:
632:non-starter.
570:
533:
531:
488:
469:
450:Mid-priority
449:
409:
375:Mid‑priority
344:
304:
264:WikiProjects
210:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
425:Mathematics
416:mathematics
372:Mathematics
148:free images
31:not a forum
814:Categories
320:Statistics
311:statistics
283:Statistics
724:and then
532:The page
508:698560686
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
452:on the
347:on the
254:B-class
211:90 days
154:WP refs
142:scholar
797:Mgnbar
773:wikify
734:Jheald
685:Mgnbar
641:Mgnbar
596:Mgnbar
260:scale.
126:Google
636:So...
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
801:talk
785:talk
738:talk
715:less
689:talk
662:talk
645:talk
615:talk
600:talk
578:talk
574:Ywaz
557:talk
542:talk
512:ISBN
505:OCLC
339:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
444:Mid
176:TWL
816::
803:)
787:)
740:)
691:)
664:)
647:)
617:)
602:)
580:)
559:)
544:)
510:,
209::
201:,
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
799:(
783:(
736:(
687:(
660:(
643:(
613:(
598:(
576:(
555:(
540:(
517:.
456:.
351:.
266::
203:4
199:3
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
