Talk:List of video games considered the best

3631:

Scrolls V: Skyrim 15. Halo: Combat Evolved 16. Pokemon HeartGold and SoulSilver 17. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18. World of Warcraft 19. Grand Theft Auto V 20. Dark Souls 21. Tetris 22. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time 23. Halo 3 24. Half-Life 2 25. God of War (2018) 26. Minecraft 27. Destiny 2 28. Stardew Valley 29. Hades 30. Inside 31. Super Mario Galaxy 2 32. Undertale 33. Cyberpunk 2077 34. Silent Hill 2 35. Mario Kart 8 Deluxe 36. Shadow of the Colossus (2005) 37. Super Mario 64 38. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 39. Overwatch 40. Journey 41. Fallout: New Vegas 42. Left 4 Dead 43. Bioshock 44. Spider-Man (2018) 45. Uncharted 4: A Thief's End 46. Super Smash Bros. Ultimate 47. League of Legends 48. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2009) 49. Devil May Cry 3: Dante's Awakening 50. Chrono Trigger 51. Gran Turismo 4 52. Outer Wilds 53. Animal Crossing: New Horizons 54. Batman: Arkham Asylum 55. Hitman: World of Assassination 56. Apex Legends 57. Celeste 58. Gears of War 2 59. Resident Evil (2002) 60. Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater 61. Civilization IV 62. Borderlands 2 63. Persona 4 Golden 64. Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas 65. Ico 66. Nier: Automata 67. Dota 2 68. Yakuza 0 69. Kingdom Hearts II 70. Sea of Thieves 71. Counter-Strike: Source 72. Fire Emblem: Three Houses 73. Castlevania: Symphony of the Night 74. Street Fighter IV 75. Return of the Obra Dinn 76. Spec Ops: The Line 77. Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood 78. Fortnite 79. Age of Empires II 80. Metroid Prime 81. Doom Eternal 82. Tomb Raider (1996) 83. PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds 84. 13 Sentinels: Aegis Rim 85. Soulcalibur II 86. Diablo IV 87. The Sims 3 88. Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door (2004) 89. Animal Crossing: Wild World 90. Phantasy Star Online 91. Dead Space (2008) 92. Sonic the Hedgehog 2 93. Mortal Kombat 11 94. Firewatch 95. Need for Speed: Underground 2 96. Earthbound 97. Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 98. Assassin's Creed Odyssey 99. Doom (2016) 100. WWE Smackdown! Here Comes the Pain

2061:. Ivan's point in February 2016 (after that AFD closed) that "We've given these games a quality ranking based on the number of times they've appeared in "best of" lists. " was an accurate criticism to the version of the article that existed in 2016, and that's part of why it was revised back to the form it's in today. It should be noted that this article was subject to heavy attention from mysterious IP addresses & low-edit users who may well have been sockpuppets at the time as the article did not start off in that form. The article in 2014 did no such ranking, nor did the article after Phediuk & others revisions. So basically you're looking at a criticism from the era when this article was at its nadir of poor sources and OR-organization. I don't think it's that relevant to the article in 2024. 3609: 2858: 4075: 3014: 2549:. I have no doubt that EGM's list is high-quality and reliable, but why would we need a list that glaringly omits a large part of video game history when we have countless other high-quality, reliable sources that actually are comprehensive lists, including ones that are contemporaneous to the EGM list? This is the "List of video games considered the best", not the "List of console games considered the best", so ignoring PC, a highly influential platform with a long history of acclaimed video games, is so blatantly 37: 3367:

what should be considered a player or a majority). Flipped around, what you're describing is "culturally impactful games" which also isn't this article's title. There are many games that may not be the best by most reasonable metrics yet are still being quite culturally impactful. Reliable sources detailing the "best" video games is the best reliable metric for this article. Six may seem arbitrary but if there's an issue with that, it's an issue with the consensus (

1583: 2637:). The criteria for that page is if a movie was voted/placed at #1 on a "best of" list, and subsections existed for lists that were only for specific genres. It only listed #1s, and anything below was excluded. User/viewer polls are also present there. I don't necessarily agree with that type of list being implemented here, since I don't think it'd be easy or feasible to implement here (if we take into account console lists, all genres, etc) and my own 2985:- Doom Eternal: It reinvented and perfected this arcade-like new age doom genre and people will buy it for decades. - Ghost of Tsusima: Simply one of the greatest open world games of the last 20 years. - Animal Crossings: New Horizons: Single handedly saved us all during the pandemic - Crash Bandicoot 4: It's About Time: I'm biased as hell but I can't think of another 3D platformer from recent years that could ever match this game. 853: 87:, and the lists must be inclusive of all games released up to that point. In other words, a list cannot have any limiting criteria that narrows its scope to a particular time period, platform, or genre. Lists such as "best games of 2012", "Best SNES games" or "Best horror games" are thus not acceptable, nor are review aggregators such as Metacritic and OpenCritic. Lists must also be editor-chosen and not reader/fan polls. 3475:

pick. So the only way it'd be added is if we found a bunch more Japanese lists that qualified for our criteria, as Japan is where the game was mega-popular. (But even then, I'd guess nostalgic JP fans would pick DQ3 for an NES entry.) Feel free to suggest any JP lists you find that might meet the criteria, just be warned that Japan really really likes reader polls which are excluded by the current criteria.

1463: 1442: 925: 1539: 1272: 4012: 2926: 2814: 483: 431: 400: 462: 1259: 2977:- Monster hunter World: I mean it literally have won RPG of the year in 2018. Has it's flaws but it's achievements and ratings cannot be doubted. - Spiderman: Still considered one of the greatest super hero game ever made. At least this first one deserves a spot in my opinion. - Celeste: At this point, I feel like it would be a crime not to include a great indie each year. 493: 3435:, even if a reliable source reflects that. Also, "list of top-ranked video games" wouldn't work because the selections aren't based on ranking, but that the games are included in these lists at all. "List of top-ranked video games" would be better off for something like which games are most often considered #1, and that's nowhere nearly as a rational subject to base with. 1555: 2385:, where it would only list games ranked as #1? Do you want the six lists requirement lowered? I don't agree or disagree with the points brought up, but similarly to what XJJSX said, if you're going to take the time to point out these "issues" (and bring back up a debate that was settled and archived), then suggesting ways they could be fixed helps. 2296:"This is a list of video games that multiple video game journalists or magazines have considered to be among the best of all time. The games listed here are included on at least six separate "best/greatest of all time" lists from different publications (inclusive of all time periods, platforms, and genres), as chosen by their editorial staffs." 3311:

When assessing the subjective worth of objects that have had a proportionally large impact on human consciousness, it is crucial to provide at least a basic context to argue its case. This might be its technical innovations or increasingly relevant themes, emotional storytelling, fluid controls, or a

101:

If you can provide citations that satisfy the criteria listed in the answer above, yes. Otherwise, no. Journalists calling it "one of the best ever" or making similar comments is not satisfactory. This means that recent releases that have achieved a particularly high degree of critical acclaim should

3438:

As for having to add an explanation with each video game listed, it's pointless. Every last game has their own article linked, and gives readers the option to find out about each game's content, reception and impact from there, without bloating either their experience or this article itself. There's

3315:

It would also help in rationalizing some of the more questionable choices. For example Crash 3 is mentioned, but many would consider it diluted and gimmicky compared to the more refined Crash 2, which is not mentioned. The other perspective might say the additional vehicles and time trial mode makes

3489:

This is just another reason I disagree with the construction of this list. According to multiple reliable sources, Dragon Quest is ranked one of the best games of all time. It feels arbitrary to exclude something of historical importance because of the subjective criteria of a few editors. Reliable

1847:

There is some support to do this, but also some opposition. You can read the old discussion for more, but the short version against IMO is that we always have the publisher, but we sometimes don't have a sensible entry for developer because the developer situation is complicated (e.g. "developers"

3474:

Probably never. You can click the link in the FAQ above for the visualized spreadsheet, and it's sitting at 3/6 lists. No new American list is ever going to include it (they'll pick DQ8, DQ11, or possibly DQ3/4/5/9 as curveballs) because it hasn't aged very well, so it'd solely be an "influence"

3366:

The title reflects usage in reliable sources, which is how such titles are determined. If reliable sources don't describe the majority of players thinking a game is the best, it wouldn't be verifiable and wouldn't be included (and is itself a very subjective metric and can vary wildly depending on

2744:

This section has been dormant for a week so I'll state I support Phediuk's claim, and ferret's claim of a lack of set count on WP:EXTRAORDINARY. I'm also confused at Shooterwalker's comment that two or three sources are valid and ordinary, but six would cross into OR. What's the thought process in

3123:

To my knowledge, this archive is the only way to access this page in English, as the link on the Japanese page now leads to the 2020 article, and trying to force the URL into the English version by removing the /jp/ from it just leads to an error page. Nevertheless, this does seem to have similar

2729:

Just a clarification here: a multiple-source threshold does not fall under WP:OR, which concerns itself solely with whether sources support article claims; that policy makes no mention of inclusion criteria, or the number of sources in an article. Supporting the claim that multiple (in this case,

2526:

is one of the very few RS publications (maybe the only? Google isn't turning up much) that has made an editor-chosen, console-only list like this. There is no evidence that console-only lists like this have ever been common. We exclude this console-only list for the same reason we would exclude a

3630:

1. Elden Ring 2. Red Dead Redemption 2 3. Persona 5 4. The Last of Us 5. Portal 2 6. The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild 7. Mass Effect 2 8. Baldur's Gate III 9. Bloodborne 10. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 11. Resident Evil 4 (2005) 12. Super Mario World 13. Final Fantasy VII 14. The Elder

3115:

on the list struck me as odd, since there is no Japanese translation of WoW to my knowledge and seems like a pretty niche title over there as a result. Sure enough, on closer inspection, at the end of the list I saw "From Esquire US". I took the link to archive.org and found the original source,

3816:

Thanks for the thoughts. If the site is ever found to be generally unreliable, it can always be removed; currently, WP:VG/S allows it to be used case-by-case, and it is widely-cited across the VG project, indicating acceptance both in policy and practice. While the site does contain low-effort

2431:

The "six separate lists" requirement has been discussed several times before. I brought it up several months ago and the discussion already seemed old hat at that point. Basically, everyone agrees that the requirement for six lists is pretty arbitrary, but barring a completely different way of

2299:

The promise (not premise) of this page is to list games considered the best of all time. The actual content of this page is a list of the "best" games per year. It's a super bizzare page and I'm surprised it continues to exist in it's current format. It should be called what it actually is

2172:

in looking for sources, if you haven't heard of it earlier. The website itself is self-published but it's a professional aggregator that can help you find lots of all-time lists and whatnot. For this article we sometimes go to Video Game Canon for similar reasons. Good luck!

2152:

Thanks Rhain, that's very blatant. I couldn't track down a copy of the page, so I presumed the criticism was of lists aggregating sources to determine what's considered the best. It is unclear to me why the page was deleted rather than just deleting rankings 2 -:

2038:. They noted that this page is also in violation, but no-one seems to have brought this up, either in the talk page archives or the AfD for this page. Just wondering what editors thoughts were; if they got it wrong or why the criticisms don't apply to this page. 3389:

I agree that six is arbitrary. But we are not here to argue the case either -- that's still just one editor's arbitrary opinion over another. We're here to summarize what the sources say, and people will need to read the individual game articles to learn more.

914: 2314:

Because that’s just been the most convenient way to organize the page my guy. If you have an idea for how the page can possibly still adhere to its “promise” while still having a clean, organized and easy to read format then you are free to suggest that.

1910:

has two main developers but with several co-operating developers. Should all be credited or should there be an et al.-approach?) And yes, some developers are just subsidiaries for companies also acting as publishers (like with Nintendo EAD). Other games

2457:

list. This wiki article is titled "List of video games considered the best". The citation is for a list of the video games considered the best by one of the main reliable source gaming magazines from the 1990s. Including that article is thus provides

1999: 3165:

Nice work digging this up. This list does appear to meet all the criteria -- RS, editor-chosen, greatest games, no platform/era/genre restrictions -- so I see no reason not to include it. If there are no objections, I will incorporate it shortly;

2641:

would (by extension) have to implement it, and basically cease to exist since most of the lists there don't use numbers. But even though I don't agree with it, it's technically a less-arbitrary criteria than "X amount of sources = you're in."

1821:

Why does this list feature publishers and not/or developers? I think that the latter is far more important because is about who actually created a game. To me is kinda like ignore the author of the novel and instead put publisher on the list.

1285: 1903:

Since my arguments during the last discussion, my concerns for clutter still stand, and while I do believe crediting the developer could be important, the approach to who and how many for each game can be a bit of a turn-off. (For instance,

2969:- Dark Souls III: Till this day some claim it to be the best Souls Like FromSoft has ever made. - Pokemon GO: Debatable if it was ever "the best" but without a doubt an innovative game and one of the biggest draws of AR mobile gaming EVER. 3439:

several columns worth of info in the table already, and the proposal of adding rationalization on each of the 200+ games would greatly disrupt this balance of informativeness and accessibility. No space for a notes column in this one IMO.

2973:- Resident Evil 7: BioHazard: One of the greatest Resident Evil games ever made. - Cuphead: One of the greatest 2D games with an incredible design and unmatched quality. - Hollow Knight: Once again a great ambassador from the indie scene. 866: 311: 3307:

This criteria strives to be objective by referencing six official publications, but this is in no way representative of what the majority of players consider the best games. It is totally arbitrary and has no place on Knowledge (XXG).

3316:

it the most complete experience of the trilogy. My point is that the short explanation tells us what kind of impact it made to earn its spot on the list, becoming actually informative and fulfilling its purpose on Knowledge (XXG).

1309: 3682:

to the list, since I think a site-wide staff team putting a list together is enough to make an exception to a "can't demonstrate notability" / "low-quality source" rule. With that being said, I'd still take caution with the fact

1403: 1565: 878: 2997:-Baldur's Gate 3: Game of the year. Also such a high quality that it should borderline be a crime. Incredible game. - Hogwarts Legacy: Controversies or not, it was still the greatest Harry Potter related game EVER released. 3404:

While the impact of a game may be with popularity, and by that I assume you meant reception with a general audience, why should we base this list on such popular opinion? We could start with reader's polls, especially with

652: 3817:

articles, this is not one of them; it is long, every entry has a write-up, and dozens of journalists have contributed to it. Not seeing much of a reason to exclude it at present, unless others are strongly opposed.

2031: 1676:

There are so many different versions of Tetris, some better than others... Are all of these versions worthy of being considered among the best games ever made, or just a few of these versions, or even just one?

756: 2669:

I don't get your accusation of "PC games" because that is ambiguous. Several listed titles in the last 10, 15, even 20 years have a fair amount of PC titles listed, including cross-platform titles released on

4208:

except in some rare circumstances (ex. as a primary source, qualified author). So no, this source can not be used on this page, even if it seems "quite well constructed" per official Knowledge (XXG) policy.

2678:

PC titles? The latter makes more sense since the gap between PC and console hardware was wider. But can you provide a ratio of PC and console titles in the 20th and 21st centuries, to confirm a console-only

3142:

1. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time 2. Super Mario World 3. Tetris 4. Street Fighter II 5. Wii Sports 6. Pokémon Red and Blue 7. World of Warcraft 8. Kingdom Hearts II 9. Overwatch 10. Super Mario Kart

2083:

problem. Not all "list of 100 best x"s are ranked (for example the first citation), so ranking is not a prerequisite for recreating, and solving that particular issue doesn't mean all issues are resolved.

2748:

Going through all this, I'm gonna ask if the lede should be revised again to better reflect its criteria. It's been scrutinized but knowing the IP's initial accusation I feel the need to discuss it here.

1297: 170: 2057:). It was one editor who brought up this article in that AFD as a similar problem, Ivanvector. If you were able to dig up old AFDs, you can look up the old talk page discussions at the time too, see 2989:- It Takes Two: One of the greatest co-op game I played. Once again, 1 in a 100 quality. - Forza Horizon 5: Might be a bad pick but I can't stop hearing about how Forza and racing games peaked here. 1917:) don't even have a company/label for a developer. Going through all this gives me less concern over listing developers compared to the original publisher, as there's more complications than needed. 3691:

and a lot of people (myself included) brought up concerns regarding its quality at the reliable sources noticeboard discussion for it about a year ago. But again, I think this can be an exception.

3353: 3317: 2730:

six) sources list a particular game as one of the best of all time requires no more than to provide said sources. This page does so for all entries, and therefore, all of its claims are supported.

2577:. It definitely is arbitrary. Ironically, a lot of the proposals to fix it are also arbitrary. It would be very easy to just lower the threshold to "multiple reliable sources" (e.g.: three) as per 2682:

And yeah, you can't provide an argument without having a proper counter-counterargument and solution to their counterarguments. This is arbitrary, yes, but what if the current form of the article

3352:

It should be something like "list of top-ranked video games". Games are not considered the best because they appeared in six "best of all time" lists, the evidence lies in their cultural impact.

3104:

I searched around trying to find a potential Japanese source for the article, considering the rather unfortunate lack of them, but ran into a new source from Esquire instead. I found this source:

72: 68: 64: 890: 665: 285: 2494:

s console-only approach to making top-games lists was common in the 1990s. This is not the case. The majority of lists from the 1990s are not console-only lists; in fact, it's pretty much just

76: 902: 4204:

The difference is that SVG is a flat out unreliable source, unlike Screen Rant or Dexerto that are situational and can technically still be used. Unreliable sources can not be used per the

1367: 691: 639: 2187:

I'm not against the idea of a "List of albums/songs considered the best" page, but please be cautious that Acclaimed Music is not considered a reliable source, so do not cite it directly.

1864:

50% of our readers are on mobile. So there's something to be said for cutting down columns to just the most important ones. The link we really want people to click on is the link to the

1334: 1321: 730: 3612:

turns up thousands of citations for the site across Knowledge (XXG), so it is de facto widely used as a source. This list therefore seems good to go, to me. I have transcribed it below

2361: 1841: 1778: 1385: 387: 383: 379: 2058: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 2410:

A) The entry requirements for this list has been discussed to death at this point so just saying “it needs to change” without saying how just isn’t being productive quite frankly.

3799: 2102:

article is a copyvio? Nobody in that ancient AFD - that was a criticism of the song list, which presumably repeated all of a source's list. We don't do that in this article.

1391: 614: 2638: 3111:

I thought that perhaps I had found what I was looking for, given that this source was in Japanese and was distinct from both the 2018 and 2020 list. But the inclusion of

391: 717: 41: 769: 2581:. Even for those who are concerned it would create a size issue, we could easily remove a column or two, make room for some new rows, and preserve the current size. 2993:-God of War: Ragnarök: It was bigger and better in almost every aspect but some bugs and unpolished bits left a sour taste. Still a ridiculously high quality game. 1361: 1353: 743: 549: 2595:

The problem is that EXTRAORDINARY doesn't set any count. It doesn't make a floor of three (or any floor other than "multiple"), so three is no less arbitrary. --

1397: 1379: 2121: 1848:

that are just an internal team at a large publisher, developers changing during production, multiple developers for different parts of a game). Complicated is

1409: 788: 678: 205: 2358:

issue with excluding reliable, published "best game of all time" lists that do not rank PC games. (Or any other combination of platforms.) As discussed here:

3552:

Hi, thanks for digging this up. However, this list does not make any claim that these are the best games; it is explicitly about the most influential games.

3020:

Please see the criteria listed on the page itself and this talk page, the opinions of individual editors is not what determines what is placed on this list.

1347: 4253: 1160: 539: 3349:

If the article is not representative of what the majority of players consider the best games, why is the title "list of video games considered the best"?

3411:, but the quality of this article would dip very quickly as a result, and wouldn't look any different if we had self-published sources (especially from 1094: 704: 317: 3526: 4258: 279: 1517: 609: 515: 255: 3525:

list published four years before that. Neither the archive link nor the original page in the citation I found worked, so I went to the Wayback and

211: 4248: 3530: 2953:

In my opinion the following games should be added since they were either innovative, unique or produced great numbers and were liked by everyone:

1920:

As to Dissident93, while we can remove even less clutter with the genres column, it should stay as it's the only descriptor of what the games are

1357: 150: 3118: 2362:

Talk:List of video games considered the best/Archive_11#"Best Games of All Time" articles are frequently console-only; NPOV issue to exclude them

102:

not be added immediately. Give each game the time it needs for its legacy to be assessed and be included in such lists that satisfy the criteria.

3604:

of the "100 best games of all time" today. It is unrestricted by platform/era/genre. The site is currently listed as situationally reliable on

2499: 2413:

B) The article explicitly says on the front page (and has been checked to make sure of this) that the lists are inclusive of all time periods,

1731:

As I understand it, all Classic Tetris games can be eligible, including those released only in Japan, except Guideline and TGM games, correct?

261: 1593: 4268: 1507: 908: 2301: 2282: 156: 2454: 1036: 577: 562: 506: 467: 1868:

anyway, where they can find wikilinks to the developer, publisher, creators, and so on. So every column really needs to earn its keep.

1279: 267: 4273: 4059: 3922: 3919: 3641: 648: 3357: 3321: 1483: 1913: 1786: 1782: 1694: 1126: 3312:

combination of these. How could anyone understand why Pong is on this list without the background of how simple and addictive it is?

3124:

editorial standards to the other Esquire articles, and is distinct from the other lists, and thus should be counted as a new source.

2961:- Five Nights and Freddy's: I would add this first one simply because it had a slight twist on your average horror game at the time. 1759:

I can understand that with Tetris, but the Oregon trail series varies greatly in all but spirit. Deserves a bit more reconsideration

225: 4263: 2634: 2630: 251: 113:

Of course, but only after consensus is reached between editors. Start a discussion here if you would like to suggest an alternative.

3331:

The criteria of coverage in multiple reliable sources is not arbitrary. As the lede indicates, this article does not purport to be

1622: 824: 230: 146: 125: 3282:

Yep, I just preemptively added it so I did not forget. Should be on the main page soon given no issues (otherwise I will revert).

3956: 2432:

organizing the list that hasn't been discussed as of yet, it is the most removed from editor opinion as we can get at this point.

1597: 860: 129: 200: 2417:, and genres, so unless I or another user has missed something then I don’t know where this console only point is coming from. 297: 442: 3831:

I back what Phediuk said. Besides that the provided list is exceptional in production and devotion despite the uneasiness of

3653: 1303: 3490:

sources should take precedence. I recognize that others disagree, but I want to point out the loss of reliable information.

1479: 1475: 1470: 1447: 191: 2381:

So what are either of you (both PK-WIKI and the IP) suggesting be done with the page then? Do you want a format similar to

1698:; both games are ported to death and some ports have varying significance, but we stick with the first versions. While the 3948: 3724: 3056: 988: 4086: 2701: 2476:

such as "must contain PC and console games" when that criteria does not exist in the contemporary reliable source lists.

2344: 2035: 2382: 1706: 1074: 3902: 3221: 2230:

I wasn't too certain on if the editor knew that directly, and either way, it was worth bringing up that it's listed at

1589: 1561: 830: 4050: 3106: 2159: 2089: 2043: 1958:

The table is fine as is. IMO the article's amount of columns is in a fair balance as both accessible and informative.

1373: 128:; use the headers at the left to jump to the list(s) you want to check. A visualized spreadsheet can also been viewed 1717:. It would be unreasonably complicated to split by every port for something near-identical in concepts and gameplay. 1032: 273: 3051:

So GameInformer shut down today and nuked all of their content, anyone knows if their lists have been archived yet?

2900:

For future reference, but we do give some leeway for ports released within a month or so after the initial date. ~

2439:

on console games. If this list is to be inclusive of all platforms, that obviously would not be good for the list.

399: 338: 4018: 3798:. The last RFC in Sept 2023 nearly found it generally unreliable but was weakly considered situational still. See 3371:) used to determine what "multiple" should mean in this instance, it doesn't mean the list itself is arbitrary. - 3084:

The GI lists were both published in the magazine itself, so the website shutdown should not affect anything here.

2932: 2820: 2745:

that? Did they decide for themselves on that number? Wouldn't that be OR in itself? That's not really considerate.

2578: 2034:

for List of songs considered the best and there was a pretty strong consensus that the page should be deleted per

235: 3515: 3258: 3155: 3066:

Every list implemented on the article can be found on the Google Docs omnibus data (found in the FAQ), including

2841:

For the Red Dead Redemption 2 table row, add that it is a PC game apart from also being for XBox and Playstation

2558: 2444: 1146: 1122: 2473: 410: 17: 3938: 3720: 3304:"Each game must be included on at least six 'best games of all time' lists compiled by separate publications." 3052: 2763:

No need; the lede already states the criteria, and several others have already refuted the IP's initial claim.

946: 872: 852: 303: 3839:

at least, makes the skepticism for this potential reference understandable, but more disproven. Also, even if

3119:

http://web.archive.org/web/20190306080814/https://www.esquire.com/lifestyle/g26572573/best-video-games-ranked/

2305: 2286: 448: 4063: 3926: 2704:? Or are we going to continue basing this page off of an arbitrary requirement as some of y'all have stated. 3972: 3537:'s "100 Games of the Millennium" (2000), but I think it still qualifies. Did someone look into this before? 3495: 3395: 2965:- Ori and the Blind Forest: It was one of the main ambassadors of the indie scene alongside with Undertale. 2618: 2586: 1980: 1949: 1906: 1703: 1327: 1315: 1212: 1192: 834: 635: 81:

each game must be included on at least six "best games of all time" lists compiled by separate publications.

3002: 2846: 1882:

If this has to be brought back, then one suggestion could be to make the column support both if different (

3960: 2155: 2085: 2039: 1890:). But I think the current iteration is fine, if anything we could remove genres for even less clutter. ~ 1863:, but the list already requires horizontal scrollbars on mobile even on gigantic phone screens. And : --> 726: 2329:

It's not the list of "best games per year". It's just that the release year of the games are denoted. --

1944:. I agree that publisher is the least informative, and that it is more useful to know who made the game. 181: 4229: 4221: 4199: 4185: 4177: 4155: 4132: 4098: 4094: 4067: 3988: 3930: 3913: 3894: 3876: 3862: 3826: 3811: 3787: 3773: 3753: 3728: 3711: 3703: 3672: 3581: 3561: 3546: 3499: 3491: 3484: 3468: 3448: 3399: 3391: 3380: 3361: 3344: 3325: 3291: 3277: 3262: 3232: 3213: 3195: 3181: 3159: 3093: 3079: 3060: 3040: 3032: 3006: 2908: 2895: 2850: 2786: 2772: 2758: 2739: 2724: 2716: 2695: 2662: 2654: 2622: 2614: 2604: 2590: 2582: 2562: 2540: 2485: 2448: 2426: 2405: 2397: 2376: 2338: 2324: 2309: 2290: 2254: 2246: 2225: 2207: 2199: 2182: 2163: 2147: 2111: 2093: 2070: 2047: 2019: 1992: 1967: 1953: 1945: 1933: 1898: 1877: 1834: 1830: 1802: 1768: 1754: 1740: 1736: 1726: 1686: 1682: 1663: 1649: 1634: 514:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

196: 2998: 2842: 1826: 4143: 3952: 3920:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qhUnal80p0H42sRjMvONXCtYozBzFgFcFxWb98HMSvQ/edit?usp=drivesdk

3254: 3151: 2554: 2490:

Hi, thanks for the comment. However, I want to clear up one point here, as your comment implies that

2440: 1699: 984: 2080: 2079:

Interesting, thankyou for the links. This seems to only respond to a synth problem, rather than the

1554: 1271: 4191: 4147: 3868: 3460: 3187: 1984: 1760: 1732: 1678: 1070: 414: 291: 4082: 3794:

I'm a little hesitant to use a situational source, especially one that has faced numerous RfCs at

2461: 2117: 1745:

I mean, they're all still the same game, at least including those mentioned on the sourced lists.

4195: 4151: 3872: 3858: 3769: 3749: 3659: 3577: 3568: 3542: 3480: 3464: 3444: 3191: 3075: 2782: 2754: 2691: 2221: 2178: 2154:

10 to conform with list of films voted the greatest. I might recreate the page in light of this.

2107: 2066: 1988: 1963: 1929: 1873: 1798: 1764: 1750: 1722: 998: 498: 415: 2550: 2466: 2436: 2355: 1291: 820: 84: 3890: 3822: 3783: 3761: 3668: 3601: 3557: 3519:(1986/1989), I snooped around for some "all time" sources and found a citation from 2009 of a 3209: 3177: 3168: 3089: 2768: 2735: 2573:

I agree that there's no real basis for the "at least six sources" standard, and it edges into

2536: 2481: 2372: 2015: 1659: 1630: 177: 4162: 3847: 3605: 2469:

for us here to exclude contemporary, top-tier reliable source lists on the basis of complete

2007: 1941: 1842:

Talk:List_of_video_games_considered_the_best/Archive_10#Why_list_publisher_but_not_developer?

4214: 4170: 4090: 4046: 3984: 3807: 3696: 3287: 3025: 2901: 2709: 2647: 2600: 2390: 2334: 2239: 2192: 1891: 1645: 1174: 412: 3795: 3688: 3368: 2351: 2231: 2053:

That AFD discussion is from January 2016. This article looked very different at the time (

2006:, so the site's reliability is uncertain. It should at least be vetted on the talk page at 4190:

Still, I think this particular list seems quite well constructed even if source is shoddy

4121: 4081:

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a

3909: 3376: 3340: 3273: 3249:

Hello, just wanted to point out that according to the spreadsheet version of the omnibus,

3228: 2884: 2422: 2320: 2169: 2136: 1240: 752: 4205: 2610: 2574: 2470: 3846:

has a downgrade after the acceptance of this list, hopefully no earlier than next year,

2522:

lists are all-platform-inclusive. Nothing has really changed on that front; even today,

3968: 1714: 1188: 978: 960: 713: 3572:'s 2020 list is in since it has "greatest" in the title, if that's correct reasoning. 4242: 3942: 3854: 3765: 3745: 3573: 3538: 3476: 3440: 3071: 2778: 2750: 2687: 2217: 2174: 2103: 2062: 1959: 1925: 1869: 1794: 1746: 1718: 1132: 1080: 1004: 765: 4109:

to be added to the list, I'm afraid it's only been named by one publication so far.

3903:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DW-2yjPbKkdj4qaIkE85VsT1T2uhDwxsPn70kfuHimw/edit

3222:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DW-2yjPbKkdj4qaIkE85VsT1T2uhDwxsPn70kfuHimw/edit

3886: 3818: 3779: 3734: 3664: 3553: 3205: 3173: 3107:

https://www.esquire.com/jp/lifestyle/tech/g26743189/best-video-games-ranked-190307/

3085: 2764: 2731: 2546: 2532: 2477: 2368: 2011: 1887: 1883: 1853: 1655: 1626: 1042: 1018: 739: 1852:

for a simple list. Casual readers want to search all the Nintendo games, not the

3918:

The top 100 list using no older than 10-year-old sources has been updated, too--

2700:

So does anyone have any ideas on adjusting this pages criteria to get rid of the

1785:

is emphasized as the best, it has been treated almost no differently compared to

3980: 3803: 3738: 3420: 3283: 2596: 2330: 1641: 1640:

It was allowed to archive deliberately, as the omnibus is linked in the FAQ. --

1108: 932: 814: 810: 2435:

Also, that last point will do the exact opposite of what you argue, putting an

2124:. The games list, while certainly not perfect, does not have the same problem. 4112: 3905: 3647: 3639:

If there are no objections, I will incorporate this list shortly. Entries for

3372: 3336: 3269: 3224: 2875: 2418: 2316: 2127: 2059:

Talk:List_of_video_games_considered_the_best/Archive_1#List_inclusion_criteria

1198: 884: 784: 674: 570: 511: 488: 3678:

I have no problems with this list for similar reasons why I supported adding

3964: 2609:

Three seems to be an ordinary reading, but two would also be valid. (Six is

1462: 1441: 1056: 994: 896: 482: 461: 118:

Q4: Where can I find the omnibus data for which games appear on which lists?

3744:

Also it's amazing how we found two viable lists this month, how sunny, lol

3268:

Pheduik is working on it he’s incorporating KH2 into the list as we speak.

1840:

This has come up before, and I believe this is the most recent discussion:

3976: 3521: 1981:

https://www.fortressofsolitude.co.za/the-12-best-video-games-of-all-time/

661: 1625:; use the headers at the left to jump to the list(s) you want to check. 3835:, that the publication is still used in these thousands of references, 3596: 3412: 3407: 1226: 700: 3333:

representative of what the majority of players consider the best games

4126: 4041: 2889: 2629:

An alternative idea that I saw someone bring up at the talk page for

2141: 687: 3778:

Whoops, forgot the link; added it to my initial comment. Thank you.

3417:

are professionally curated, by established publications and critics.

4144:

https://www.svg.com/852269/98-best-video-games-of-all-time-ranked/

3335:, and what is questionable to you may not be to another reader. - 1940:

We should remove genre, publisher, and developer, for the sake of

974: 36: 3800:

Knowledge (XXG):Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_416#Dexerto

3716:

The people who were waiting for New Vegas can finally celebrate.

323: 2168:

If you do get around to recreating it, I suggest you check out

4146:

Another list just a week or two later, I think this is solid.

4054: 4006: 3741:

for all entries that went up a level, including new additions.

3218:

I’ve updated my Top 100 list for those who are curious/miss it

2920: 2808: 1577: 1549: 1533: 424: 416: 141: 26: 83:

The publications must be identified as a reliable source per

3853:

and the time period for the former's quality will be noted.

2453:

It would not put undue weight on the article to include the

1924:, perhaps being more informative than the publisher column. 3415:) implemented with it. All of the referenced sources here 1482:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 3566:

Ah I see, thank you. Did some checking and it looks like

1588:

On 21 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be

1594:

List of video games considered the best by media outlets

2054: 1414: 1246: 1232: 1218: 1204: 1180: 1166: 1152: 1138: 1114: 1100: 1086: 1062: 1048: 1024: 1010: 966: 952: 938: 619: 604: 599: 594: 589: 584: 329: 47: 3719:

Which games would have five entries due to this list?

2498:

that made a list like that, per WP:VG's collection of

2343:

The "on at least six separate lists" requirements is

3513:

So in relation to the above discussion on the first

510:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1773:You're right that I shouldn't dismiss versions of 2026:Deletion Discussion for Songs Considered the Best 57:Q1: What is the inclusion criteria for this list? 3300:Arbitrary lists do not belong on Knowledge (XXG) 3253:is apparently eligible to be added to the page. 159:for general discussion of the article's subject. 18:Talk:List of video games considered the greatest 2674:PCs and consoles. Do you mean PC-exclusive? Or 2957:- Metro Last Light - Rayman Legends - Outlast 1998:Hi, thanks for finding this new list. A quick 4003:Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2024 3433:Knowledge (XXG) isn't based on fans' opinions 2633:was making this list more like that article ( 63:As decided by previous discussions here (see 8: 3459:Just curious. Seems like a major blind spot 3423:'s. I don't want to begin explaining why a 2917:Semi-protected edit request on 17 July 2024 2805:Semi-protected edit request on 10 July 2024 1474:, an attempt to structure and organize all 1161:Lego Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures 3615: 3130: 1793:as a single game rather than as a series. 1436: 557: 456: 430: 428: 107:Q3: Can the inclusion criteria be changed? 3937:Visualised data updated. Also, to answer 3802:. This is the RFC that WP:VG/S cites. -- 3455:How long before Dragon Quest 1 gets added 2116:The songs list was a textbook example of 252:"List of video games considered the best" 1478:. If you wish to help, please visit the 3529:that's archived as far back as...2001? 3354:2A01:4B00:F01A:BE00:4EEE:239F:ADC6:F520 3318:2A01:4B00:F01A:BE00:4EEE:239F:ADC6:F520 1438: 1095:Pokémon Sword and Shield Expansion Pass 524:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Video games 458: 151:List of video games considered the best 3332: 1777:as the same from each other. However, 2002:turns up only a few WP citations for 1258: 7: 2864:Per the header, that column is for " 2281:Meta discussion regarding this page 2212:I noted it is self-published, which 1789:by sources, most of them mentioning 1468:This article is within the scope of 924: 910:Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted 504:This article is within the scope of 3642:Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door 2347:and must be removed from this page. 582: 447:It is of interest to the following 149:for discussing improvements to the 4254:Mid-importance video game articles 3848:it'll be no more situational than 2216:mean it isn't reliable anyway...? 2120:before it was deleted—take a look 1281:The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask 25: 3200:Done. I have also added the 2019 2631:List of films considered the best 2553:I shouldn't even have to say it. 2455:EGM 1997 "Best Games of All Time" 1859:You could argue we could include 1817:Developers instead of publishers? 1621:The omnibus list data is located 1564:on 22 August 2015. The result of 1492:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Lists 176:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 124:The omnibus list data is located 4259:WikiProject Video games articles 4073: 4010: 3957:Counter Strike: Global Offensive 3663:will be added to the main page. 3527:found the relevant page and list 3172:will be added to the main page. 3012: 2924: 2856: 2812: 1581: 1553: 1537: 1461: 1440: 1270: 1257: 923: 851: 649:List of Pokémon special episodes 527:Template:WikiProject Video games 491: 481: 460: 429: 398: 171:Click here to start a new topic. 35: 3867:Are we going to add the games? 1560:This article was nominated for 1512:This article has been rated as 544:This article has been rated as 4249:List-Class video game articles 4230:20:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 4200:19:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 4186:18:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 4156:18:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 3070:'s. Shit still sucks, though. 1305:Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 1: 3949:Animal Crossing: New Horizons 3687:is described as a tabloid by 3654:Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood 1709:ports are the most historic, 1544:Deletion and move discussions 1476:list pages on Knowledge (XXG) 1268: 1255: 921: 862:List of generation IX Pokémon 849: 843: 804: 629: 575: 518:and see a list of open tasks. 168:Put new text under old text. 4269:Mid-importance List articles 3899:I’ve Updated My Top 100 List 3881:Done. I have also added the 3594:Gaming news and review site 3533:is certainly different than 3047:Archiving GameInformer lists 2981:- Sekiro: Shadow Dies Twice 2527:computer-only list, such as 2383:List of films voted the best 850:Featured content candidates 4133:21:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 4099:12:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 4068:10:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 4051:Sony Computer Entertainment 4033:to reactivate your request. 4021:has been answered. Set the 3989:05:19, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 3931:07:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 3914:03:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 3895:19:35, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 3877:23:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 3863:02:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 3827:17:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 3812:15:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 3788:15:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 3774:02:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 3760:Dude, where's the link? Is 3754:02:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 3729:22:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 3712:20:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 3673:20:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 3582:22:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 3562:21:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 3547:17:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 3500:15:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 3485:22:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 3469:22:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 3449:17:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 3400:13:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 3381:17:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 3362:15:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 3345:13:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 3326:13:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 2947:to reactivate your request. 2935:has been answered. Set the 2872:, that's PS4 and Xbox One. 2835:to reactivate your request. 2823:has been answered. Set the 2030:Hi all, I've just read the 1265:No did you know nominations 4290: 4274:WikiProject Lists articles 3979:are all at 5 sources now. 3885:list to the omnibus data. 3292:01:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 3278:22:47, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 3263:22:43, 7 August 2024 (UTC) 3233:02:29, 9 August 2024 (UTC) 3214:13:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC) 3204:list to the omnibus data. 3196:19:34, 6 August 2024 (UTC) 3182:15:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 3160:02:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC) 3094:19:11, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 3080:22:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC) 3061:21:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC) 1518:project's importance scale 1495:Template:WikiProject Lists 1269:Reviews and reassessments 550:project's importance scale 95:game be added to the list? 52:Frequently asked questions 3427:opinion doesn't equate a 3041:19:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC) 3007:19:43, 17 July 2024 (UTC) 2909:21:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 2896:03:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 2851:03:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 2787:15:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 2773:14:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 2759:20:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 2740:19:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC) 2725:19:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC) 2623:18:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC) 2563:22:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 2020:21:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 1993:02:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 1954:19:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 1934:16:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1899:15:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1878:04:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1835:03:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1755:21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC) 1741:21:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC) 1727:19:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC) 1687:18:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC) 1548: 1511: 1456: 1344: 922:Good article nominations 842: 628: 573: 556: 543: 476: 455: 206:Be welcoming to newcomers 4264:List-Class List articles 2696:00:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2663:00:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2639:list similar to this one 2605:23:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 2591:23:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 2541:20:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2486:20:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2449:22:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 2427:21:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 2406:20:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 2377:20:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 2339:19:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 2325:18:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 2310:17:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 2291:17:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 2255:01:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC) 2234:directly as unreliable. 2226:00:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC) 2208:21:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 2183:20:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 2164:07:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 2148:07:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 2112:07:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 2094:05:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 2071:05:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 2048:03:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 1968:20:53, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 1825:Should this be changed? 1803:08:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 1769:00:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 1664:16:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC) 1650:22:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 1635:20:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 1123:The King of Fighters '99 1033:Pokémon Sword and Shield 947:Puff-puff (onomatopoeia) 874:Mario Party: The Top 100 249:Find video game sources: 4206:reliable sources policy 3973:Return of the Obra Dinn 2465:for this article. It's 1907:Super Smash Bros. Brawl 1672:What version of Tetris? 1317:A Space for the Unbound 1213:The Great Giana Sisters 831:Minecraft – Volume Beta 636:List of Tiger handhelds 578:Video games WikiProject 563:Video games WikiProject 507:WikiProject Video games 4161:Unreliable source per 4083:"change X to Y" format 3127:The list in question: 2868:platform(s)" only—for 2684:is the least arbitrary 2529:Computer Gaming World' 2350:There is also a major 2055:Article as of Jan 2016 1404:translation from japan 1147:Fan-made Pokémon games 727:SuperBot Entertainment 437:This article is rated 201:avoid personal attacks 4105:If you're asking for 2870:Red Dead Redemption 2 1779:a previous discussion 1348:Articles that need... 441:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 392:Auto-archiving period 226:Neutral point of view 3600:just posted a staff 2004:Fortress of Solitude 1976:Fortress of Solitude 1783:the Apple II version 985:Shin Megami Tensei V 847:No major discussions 231:No original research 3939:Anonymouseditor2k19 3721:Anonymouseditor2k19 3053:Anonymouseditor2k19 2345:WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH 530:video game articles 3660:Fallout: New Vegas 1713:originated on the 1071:Yoshi's New Island 499:Video games portal 443:content assessment 212:dispute resolution 173: 4130: 4037: 4036: 3636: 3635: 3531:This 15-game list 3251:Kingdom Hearts II 3245:Kingdom Hearts II 3169:Kingdom Hearts II 3148: 3147: 3116:released in 2019: 3113:World of Warcraft 2951: 2950: 2893: 2839: 2838: 2702:original research 2156:Rollinginhisgrave 2145: 2086:Rollinginhisgrave 2040:Rollinginhisgrave 1781:shows that while 1612: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1576: 1575: 1532: 1531: 1528: 1527: 1524: 1523: 1471:WikiProject Lists 1435: 1434: 1431: 1430: 1427: 1426: 1423: 1422: 844:Other discussions 805:Merge discussions 423: 422: 292:free news sources 192:Assume good faith 169: 140: 139: 50: 16:(Redirected from 4281: 4228: 4226: 4219: 4184: 4182: 4175: 4131: 4124: 4119: 4089:if appropriate. 4077: 4076: 4047:Action-adventure 4028: 4024: 4014: 4013: 4007: 3710: 3708: 3701: 3616: 3369:which can change 3131: 3039: 3037: 3030: 3016: 3015: 2942: 2938: 2928: 2927: 2921: 2894: 2887: 2882: 2860: 2859: 2830: 2826: 2816: 2815: 2809: 2723: 2721: 2714: 2661: 2659: 2652: 2579:WP:EXTRAORDINARY 2531:s 1996 Top 150. 2404: 2402: 2395: 2253: 2251: 2244: 2206: 2204: 2197: 2146: 2139: 2134: 1914:The Oregon Trail 1787:the 1971 version 1695:The Oregon Trail 1654:Got it, thanks. 1596:. The result of 1585: 1584: 1578: 1557: 1550: 1541: 1540: 1534: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1493: 1490: 1465: 1458: 1457: 1452: 1444: 1437: 1331:(NES video game) 1274: 1261: 1260: 1256:DYK nominations 1249: 1235: 1221: 1207: 1183: 1175:The Outer Worlds 1169: 1155: 1141: 1117: 1103: 1089: 1065: 1051: 1027: 1013: 969: 955: 941: 927: 926: 855: 798: 779: 571: 558: 532: 531: 528: 525: 522: 501: 496: 495: 494: 485: 478: 477: 472: 464: 457: 440: 434: 433: 432: 425: 417: 403: 402: 393: 332: 221:Article policies 142: 40: 39: 27: 21: 4289: 4288: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4239: 4238: 4222: 4215: 4210: 4178: 4171: 4166: 4141: 4113: 4110: 4087:reliable source 4074: 4026: 4022: 4011: 4005: 3704: 3697: 3692: 3637: 3624: 3592: 3511: 3457: 3302: 3255:Jabberwocky7297 3247: 3152:IAmACowWhoIsMad 3149: 3136: 3102: 3049: 3033: 3026: 3021: 3013: 2940: 2936: 2925: 2919: 2876: 2873: 2857: 2828: 2824: 2813: 2807: 2717: 2710: 2705: 2655: 2648: 2643: 2555:IAmACowWhoIsMad 2520:The Independent 2504:Next Generation 2500:top games lists 2474:WP:LISTCRITERIA 2441:IAmACowWhoIsMad 2398: 2391: 2386: 2279: 2277:Meta discussion 2247: 2240: 2235: 2200: 2193: 2188: 2170:Acclaimed Music 2128: 2125: 2028: 1978: 1819: 1692:It's like with 1674: 1619: 1582: 1538: 1497: 1494: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1450: 1419: 1340: 1293:Pokémon Channel 1275: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1254: 1245: 1241:Visions of Mana 1231: 1217: 1203: 1179: 1165: 1151: 1137: 1113: 1099: 1085: 1061: 1047: 1023: 1009: 965: 951: 937: 928: 920: 856: 848: 845: 840: 821:Pokémon Emerald 806: 803: 796: 777: 753:Super Mario War 631: 624: 581: 529: 526: 523: 520: 519: 497: 492: 490: 470: 438: 419: 418: 413: 390: 247: 242: 241: 240: 217: 187: 136: 135: 134: 133: 119: 115: 114: 108: 104: 103: 96: 89: 88: 58: 53: 51: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 4287: 4285: 4277: 4276: 4271: 4266: 4261: 4256: 4251: 4241: 4240: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4140: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4102: 4101: 4085:and provide a 4035: 4034: 4015: 4004: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3969:Nier: Automata 3946: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3900: 3865: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3742: 3717: 3714: 3634: 3633: 3626: 3625: 3619: 3614: 3608:, and a quick 3591: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3510: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3487: 3456: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3436: 3402: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3350: 3301: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3246: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3219: 3146: 3145: 3138: 3137: 3134: 3129: 3117: 3105: 3101: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3082: 3048: 3045: 3044: 3043: 2949: 2948: 2929: 2918: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2837: 2836: 2817: 2806: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2746: 2698: 2680: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2433: 2429: 2411: 2408: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2348: 2341: 2327: 2302:202.58.204.234 2297: 2283:202.58.204.234 2278: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2098:Who is saying 2074: 2073: 2032:AfD discussion 2027: 2024: 2023: 2022: 1977: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1918: 1901: 1857: 1845: 1818: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1715:Electronika 60 1673: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1618: 1615: 1610: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1598:the discussion 1586: 1574: 1573: 1566:the discussion 1558: 1546: 1545: 1542: 1530: 1529: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1514:Mid-importance 1510: 1504: 1503: 1501: 1466: 1454: 1453: 1451:Mid‑importance 1445: 1433: 1432: 1429: 1428: 1425: 1424: 1421: 1420: 1418: 1417: 1412: 1407: 1401: 1395: 1389: 1383: 1377: 1371: 1365: 1345: 1342: 1341: 1339: 1338: 1325: 1313: 1301: 1289: 1276: 1264: 1263: 1253: 1252: 1238: 1224: 1210: 1196: 1189:Iron Soldier 2 1186: 1172: 1158: 1144: 1130: 1120: 1106: 1092: 1078: 1068: 1054: 1040: 1030: 1016: 1002: 992: 982: 972: 961:Tina Armstrong 958: 944: 929: 919: 918: 906: 894: 882: 870: 857: 846: 841: 839: 838: 828: 818: 807: 802: 801: 782: 763: 750: 737: 724: 714:Minecraft@Home 711: 698: 685: 672: 659: 646: 632: 626: 625: 623: 622: 617: 612: 607: 602: 597: 592: 587: 574: 567: 566: 554: 553: 546:Mid-importance 542: 536: 535: 533: 516:the discussion 503: 502: 486: 474: 473: 471:Mid‑importance 465: 453: 452: 446: 435: 421: 420: 411: 409: 408: 405: 404: 334: 333: 244: 243: 239: 238: 233: 228: 219: 218: 216: 215: 208: 203: 194: 188: 186: 185: 174: 165: 164: 161: 160: 154: 138: 137: 120: 117: 116: 109: 106: 105: 97: 91: 90: 59: 56: 55: 54: 34: 33: 32: 30: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4286: 4275: 4272: 4270: 4267: 4265: 4262: 4260: 4257: 4255: 4252: 4250: 4247: 4246: 4244: 4231: 4227: 4225: 4220: 4218: 4213: 4207: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4183: 4181: 4176: 4174: 4169: 4164: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4145: 4138: 4134: 4128: 4123: 4120: 4118: 4117: 4108: 4104: 4103: 4100: 4096: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4060:93.65.100.133 4057: 4056: 4052: 4048: 4044: 4043: 4032: 4029:parameter to 4020: 4016: 4009: 4008: 4002: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3947: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3924: 3923:100.16.223.83 3921: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3911: 3907: 3904: 3901: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3852: 3851: 3845: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3781: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3726: 3722: 3718: 3715: 3713: 3709: 3707: 3702: 3700: 3695: 3690: 3686: 3681: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3670: 3666: 3662: 3661: 3656: 3655: 3650: 3649: 3644: 3643: 3632: 3628: 3627: 3622: 3618: 3617: 3613: 3611: 3610:Google search 3607: 3603: 3599: 3598: 3589: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3570: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3518: 3517: 3508: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3492:Shooterwalker 3488: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3437: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3409: 3403: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3392:Shooterwalker 3388: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3370: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3299: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3244: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3223: 3220: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3170: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3144: 3140: 3139: 3135:Esquire, 2019 3133: 3132: 3128: 3125: 3121: 3120: 3114: 3109: 3108: 3100:Esquire, 2019 3099: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3068:Game Informer 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3036: 3031: 3029: 3024: 3019: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2946: 2943:parameter to 2934: 2930: 2923: 2922: 2916: 2910: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2891: 2886: 2883: 2881: 2880: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2834: 2831:parameter to 2822: 2818: 2811: 2810: 2804: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2777:Aight, cool. 2776: 2775: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2722: 2720: 2715: 2713: 2708: 2703: 2699: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2658: 2653: 2651: 2646: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2615:Shooterwalker 2612: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2583:Shooterwalker 2580: 2576: 2572: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2463: 2456: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2409: 2407: 2403: 2401: 2396: 2394: 2389: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2367: 2363: 2360: 2359: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2346: 2342: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2298: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2276: 2256: 2252: 2250: 2245: 2243: 2238: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2205: 2203: 2198: 2196: 2191: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2171: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2143: 2138: 2135: 2133: 2132: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2082: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 2000:Google search 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1975: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1946:Shooterwalker 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1916: 1915: 1909: 1908: 1902: 1900: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1862: 1858: 1855: 1851: 1846: 1843: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1823: 1816: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1671: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1616: 1614: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1580: 1579: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1536: 1535: 1519: 1515: 1509: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1498:List articles 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1472: 1467: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1439: 1416: 1413: 1411: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1399: 1396: 1393: 1390: 1387: 1384: 1381: 1378: 1375: 1372: 1369: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1343: 1336: 1332: 1330: 1326: 1323: 1319: 1318: 1314: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1299: 1295: 1294: 1290: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1250: 1248: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1228: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1182: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1162: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1134: 1133:Hotline Miami 1131: 1128: 1124: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1096: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1082: 1081:Dr Disrespect 1079: 1076: 1072: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1050: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1034: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1012: 1006: 1005:Kim Kitsuragi 1003: 1000: 996: 993: 990: 986: 983: 980: 976: 973: 970: 968: 962: 959: 956: 954: 948: 945: 942: 940: 934: 931: 930: 916: 912: 911: 907: 904: 900: 899: 895: 892: 888: 887: 883: 880: 876: 875: 871: 868: 864: 863: 859: 858: 854: 836: 832: 829: 826: 822: 819: 816: 812: 809: 808: 799: 793: 791: 786: 783: 780: 774: 772: 767: 766:Covet Fashion 764: 761: 759: 754: 751: 748: 746: 741: 738: 735: 733: 728: 725: 722: 720: 715: 712: 709: 707: 702: 699: 696: 694: 689: 686: 683: 681: 676: 673: 670: 668: 663: 660: 657: 655: 650: 647: 644: 642: 637: 634: 633: 627: 621: 618: 616: 613: 611: 608: 606: 603: 601: 598: 596: 593: 591: 588: 586: 583: 579: 572: 569: 568: 564: 560: 559: 555: 551: 547: 541: 538: 537: 534: 517: 513: 509: 508: 500: 489: 487: 484: 480: 479: 475: 469: 466: 463: 459: 454: 450: 444: 436: 427: 426: 407: 406: 401: 397: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 342: 340: 336: 335: 331: 328: 325: 322: 319: 316: 313: 310: 307: 306: 302: 299: 296: 293: 290: 287: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 257: 253: 250: 246: 245: 237: 236:Verifiability 234: 232: 229: 227: 224: 223: 222: 213: 209: 207: 204: 202: 198: 195: 193: 190: 189: 183: 179: 178:Learn to edit 175: 172: 167: 166: 163: 162: 158: 152: 148: 144: 143: 131: 127: 123: 112: 100: 94: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 49: 46: 43: 38: 31: 29: 28: 19: 4223: 4216: 4211: 4179: 4172: 4167: 4142: 4115: 4114: 4106: 4078: 4058: 4040: 4038: 4030: 4019:edit request 3882: 3849: 3843: 3840: 3836: 3832: 3705: 3698: 3693: 3684: 3679: 3658: 3652: 3646: 3640: 3638: 3629: 3620: 3595: 3593: 3567: 3534: 3520: 3516:Dragon Quest 3514: 3512: 3506: 3458: 3432: 3429:professional 3428: 3424: 3416: 3406: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3303: 3250: 3248: 3201: 3167: 3150: 3141: 3126: 3122: 3112: 3110: 3103: 3067: 3050: 3034: 3027: 3022: 3017: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2952: 2944: 2933:edit request 2903: 2902: 2878: 2877: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2840: 2832: 2821:edit request 2718: 2711: 2706: 2683: 2675: 2671: 2656: 2649: 2644: 2528: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2495: 2491: 2460:appropriate 2459: 2437:undue weight 2414: 2399: 2392: 2387: 2280: 2248: 2241: 2236: 2213: 2201: 2194: 2189: 2130: 2129: 2099: 2029: 2003: 1979: 1921: 1912: 1905: 1893: 1892: 1888:Bandai Namco 1884:FromSoftware 1865: 1860: 1854:Nintendo EAD 1849: 1824: 1820: 1790: 1774: 1710: 1693: 1675: 1620: 1613: 1601: 1569: 1513: 1480:project page 1469: 1368:reassessment 1346: 1328: 1316: 1304: 1292: 1280: 1244: 1230: 1216: 1202: 1178: 1164: 1150: 1136: 1112: 1098: 1084: 1060: 1046: 1043:Pixel Piracy 1022: 1019:Miner 2049er 1008: 964: 950: 936: 909: 897: 885: 873: 861: 795: 792:participants 789: 776: 773:participants 770: 760:participants 757: 747:participants 744: 740:Ryo Sakazaki 734:participants 731: 721:participants 718: 708:participants 705: 695:participants 692: 682:participants 679: 669:participants 666: 656:participants 653: 640: 545: 505: 449:WikiProjects 395: 337: 326: 320: 314: 312:WP reference 308: 304: 300: 294: 288: 282: 276: 270: 264: 258: 248: 220: 145:This is the 121: 110: 98: 93: 80: 60: 44: 4091:NotAGenious 3961:Doom (2016) 3509:, 2001/2005 3431:consensus. 3421:Screen Rant 2999:Ewokman6464 2904:Dissident93 2843:Computeroid 2508:GamesMaster 1894:Dissident93 1827:Starigniter 1392:screenshots 1109:Async Corp. 933:Donkey Kong 811:Screen Rant 643:participant 576:Summary of 565:open tasks: 561:Summary of 521:Video games 512:video games 468:Video games 286:free images 157:not a forum 4243:Categories 4023:|answered= 3844:eventually 3680:ScreenRant 3648:The Sims 3 3419:Yes, even 2937:|answered= 2825:|answered= 2545:Thank you 2081:WP:COPYVIO 1484:discussion 1354:assessment 1199:River Raid 886:The Sims 4 835:discussion 825:discussion 815:discussion 785:Vector TDx 675:Butterfree 580:open tasks 439:List-class 262:newspapers 4079:Not done: 3965:Firewatch 3837:right now 3733:Ditto to 3186:I'm down 3018:Not done. 2862:Not done: 2415:Platforms 2118:WP:TOP100 2036:WP:TOP100 1602:not moved 1386:cover art 1380:infoboxes 1057:Ether One 995:Justin Yu 898:Smash Hit 330:WPVG/Talk 214:if needed 197:Be polite 147:talk page 4217:Negative 4192:Alena 33 4173:Negative 4148:Alena 33 3977:Yakuza 0 3943:Carlinal 3869:Alena 33 3855:Carlinal 3766:Carlinal 3746:Carlinal 3699:Negative 3574:Carlinal 3569:Collider 3539:Carlinal 3535:GameSpot 3522:GameSpot 3507:GameSpot 3477:SnowFire 3461:Alena 33 3441:Carlinal 3188:Alena 33 3072:Carlinal 3028:Negative 2866:Original 2779:Carlinal 2751:Carlinal 2712:Negative 2688:Carlinal 2686:anyway? 2650:Negative 2551:WP:UNDUE 2467:WP:UNDUE 2393:Negative 2356:WP:UNDUE 2242:Negative 2218:Carlinal 2195:Negative 2175:Carlinal 2104:SnowFire 2063:SnowFire 1985:Alena 33 1983:Discuss 1960:Carlinal 1926:Carlinal 1870:SnowFire 1795:Carlinal 1761:Alena 33 1747:Carlinal 1733:FiveBlue 1719:Carlinal 1707:Nintendo 1679:FiveBlue 1562:deletion 1410:creation 797:relisted 778:relisted 662:Dokibird 339:Archives 182:get help 155:This is 153:article. 92:Q2: Can 85:WP:VG/RS 4163:WP:VG/S 3953:Celeste 3887:Phediuk 3883:Dexerto 3841:Dexerto 3833:Dexerto 3819:Phediuk 3780:Phediuk 3735:Phediuk 3685:Dexerto 3665:Phediuk 3621:Dexerto 3606:WP:VG/S 3597:Dexerto 3590:Dexerto 3554:Phediuk 3425:popular 3413:YouTube 3408:Famitsu 3206:Phediuk 3202:Esquire 3174:Phediuk 3086:Phediuk 2765:Phediuk 2732:Phediuk 2547:Phediuk 2533:Phediuk 2478:PK-WIKI 2369:PK-WIKI 2012:Phediuk 2010:first. 2008:WP:VG/S 1942:WP:SIZE 1656:Phediuk 1627:Phediuk 1516:on the 1415:merging 1394:(8,818) 1374:cleanup 1227:Pikachu 701:Neo Geo 610:vg talk 600:history 548:on the 396:90 days 274:scholar 4127:he/him 4107:Jak II 4042:Jak II 3981:BenSVE 3975:, and 3850:Kotaku 3804:ferret 3796:WP:RSN 3739:BenSVE 3689:WP:RSP 3657:, and 3623:, 2024 3284:BenSVE 2890:he/him 2597:ferret 2518:, and 2502:. The 2462:weight 2352:WP:DUE 2331:ferret 2232:WP:A/S 2214:should 2142:he/him 1856:games. 1711:Tetris 1642:ferret 1398:photos 1329:Tetris 688:Bidoof 615:alerts 445:scale. 75:, and 4116:Rhain 4027:|ans= 4017:This 3906:XJJSX 3373:Aoidh 3337:Aoidh 3270:XJJSX 3225:XJJSX 2995:2023: 2991:2022: 2987:2021: 2983:2020: 2979:2019: 2975:2018: 2971:2017: 2967:2016: 2963:2015: 2959:2014: 2955:2013: 2941:|ans= 2931:This 2879:Rhain 2829:|ans= 2819:This 2679:bias? 2676:older 2611:WP:OR 2575:WP:OR 2512:Hyper 2471:WP:OR 2419:XJJSX 2317:XJJSX 2131:Rhain 1922:about 1700:Atari 1617:Lists 1590:moved 1489:Lists 1448:Lists 1406:(190) 1388:(249) 1247:start 1233:start 1219:start 1205:start 1181:start 1167:start 1153:start 1139:start 1115:start 1101:start 1087:start 1063:start 1049:start 1025:start 1011:start 975:Birdo 967:start 953:start 939:start 620:purge 605:shell 590:watch 324:VG/RL 318:VG/RS 280:JSTOR 268:books 210:Seek 4196:talk 4152:talk 4095:talk 4064:talk 4039:|- | 3985:talk 3941:and 3927:talk 3910:talk 3891:talk 3873:talk 3859:talk 3823:talk 3808:talk 3784:talk 3770:talk 3764:it? 3762:this 3750:talk 3737:and 3725:talk 3669:talk 3602:list 3578:talk 3558:talk 3543:talk 3496:talk 3481:talk 3465:talk 3445:talk 3396:talk 3377:talk 3358:talk 3341:talk 3322:talk 3288:talk 3274:talk 3259:talk 3229:talk 3210:talk 3192:talk 3178:talk 3156:talk 3090:talk 3076:talk 3057:talk 3003:talk 2847:talk 2783:talk 2769:talk 2755:talk 2736:talk 2692:talk 2672:both 2635:link 2619:talk 2601:talk 2587:talk 2559:talk 2537:talk 2516:Flux 2482:talk 2445:talk 2423:talk 2373:talk 2335:talk 2321:talk 2306:talk 2287:talk 2222:talk 2179:talk 2160:talk 2122:here 2108:talk 2100:this 2090:talk 2067:talk 2044:talk 2016:talk 1989:talk 1964:talk 1950:talk 1930:talk 1874:talk 1866:game 1861:both 1831:talk 1799:talk 1765:talk 1751:talk 1737:talk 1723:talk 1702:and 1683:talk 1660:talk 1646:talk 1631:talk 1623:here 1600:was 1570:keep 1568:was 1400:(66) 1382:(19) 630:AfDs 595:edit 585:view 256:news 199:and 130:here 126:here 48:edit 42:view 4224:MP1 4180:MP1 4139:SVG 4055:PS2 4025:or 3706:MP1 3035:MP1 2939:or 2827:or 2719:MP1 2657:MP1 2613:.) 2524:EGM 2496:EGM 2492:EGM 2400:MP1 2249:MP1 2202:MP1 2153:--> 1850:bad 1791:TOT 1775:TOT 1704:two 1592:to 1508:Mid 1376:(8) 1370:(0) 1360:) ( 1335:rev 1322:rev 1310:nom 1298:nom 1286:nom 1193:nom 1127:nom 1075:nom 1037:nom 999:nom 989:nom 979:nom 915:nom 903:nom 891:nom 879:nom 867:nom 540:Mid 305:NYT 298:TWL 122:A4: 111:A3: 99:A2: 79:), 61:A1: 4245:: 4198:) 4165:. 4154:) 4111:– 4097:) 4066:) 4031:no 3987:) 3971:, 3967:, 3963:, 3959:, 3955:, 3951:, 3929:) 3912:) 3893:) 3875:) 3861:) 3825:) 3810:) 3786:) 3772:) 3752:) 3727:) 3671:) 3651:, 3645:, 3580:) 3560:) 3545:) 3498:) 3483:) 3467:) 3447:) 3398:) 3379:) 3360:) 3343:) 3324:) 3290:) 3276:) 3261:) 3231:) 3212:) 3194:) 3180:) 3158:) 3092:) 3078:) 3059:) 3005:) 2945:no 2874:– 2849:) 2833:no 2785:) 2771:) 2757:) 2738:) 2694:) 2621:) 2603:) 2589:) 2561:) 2539:) 2514:, 2510:, 2506:, 2484:) 2447:) 2425:) 2375:) 2354:/ 2337:) 2323:) 2308:) 2289:) 2224:) 2181:) 2162:) 2126:– 2110:) 2092:) 2069:) 2046:) 2018:) 1991:) 1966:) 1952:) 1932:) 1886:/ 1876:) 1833:) 1801:) 1767:) 1753:) 1739:) 1725:) 1685:) 1662:) 1648:) 1633:) 794:; 775:; 394:: 388:12 386:, 384:11 382:, 380:10 378:, 374:, 370:, 366:, 362:, 358:, 354:, 350:, 346:, 254:– 180:; 71:, 67:, 4212:λ 4194:( 4168:λ 4150:( 4129:) 4125:( 4122:☔ 4093:( 4062:( 4053:| 4049:| 4045:| 3983:( 3945:: 3925:( 3908:( 3889:( 3871:( 3857:( 3821:( 3806:( 3782:( 3768:( 3748:( 3723:( 3694:λ 3667:( 3576:( 3556:( 3541:( 3494:( 3479:( 3463:( 3443:( 3394:( 3375:( 3356:( 3339:( 3320:( 3286:( 3272:( 3257:( 3227:( 3208:( 3190:( 3176:( 3154:( 3088:( 3074:( 3055:( 3023:λ 3001:( 2892:) 2888:( 2885:☔ 2845:( 2781:( 2767:( 2753:( 2734:( 2707:λ 2690:( 2645:λ 2617:( 2599:( 2585:( 2557:( 2535:( 2480:( 2443:( 2421:( 2388:λ 2371:( 2333:( 2319:( 2304:( 2285:( 2237:λ 2220:( 2190:λ 2177:( 2158:( 2144:) 2140:( 2137:☔ 2106:( 2088:( 2065:( 2042:( 2014:( 1987:( 1962:( 1948:( 1928:( 1911:( 1872:( 1844:. 1829:( 1797:( 1763:( 1749:( 1735:( 1721:( 1681:( 1658:( 1644:( 1629:( 1604:. 1572:. 1520:. 1486:. 1364:) 1362:0 1358:0 1356:( 1337:) 1333:( 1324:) 1320:( 1312:) 1308:( 1300:) 1296:( 1288:) 1284:( 1251:) 1243:( 1237:) 1229:( 1223:) 1215:( 1209:) 1201:( 1195:) 1191:( 1185:) 1177:( 1171:) 1163:( 1157:) 1149:( 1143:) 1135:( 1129:) 1125:( 1119:) 1111:( 1105:) 1097:( 1091:) 1083:( 1077:) 1073:( 1067:) 1059:( 1053:) 1045:( 1039:) 1035:( 1029:) 1021:( 1015:) 1007:( 1001:) 997:( 991:) 987:( 981:) 977:( 971:) 963:( 957:) 949:( 943:) 935:( 917:) 913:( 905:) 901:( 893:) 889:( 881:) 877:( 869:) 865:( 837:) 833:( 827:) 823:( 817:) 813:( 800:) 790:4 787:( 781:) 771:6 768:( 762:) 758:3 755:( 749:) 745:3 742:( 736:) 732:2 729:( 723:) 719:5 716:( 710:) 706:2 703:( 697:) 693:6 690:( 684:) 680:6 677:( 671:) 667:0 664:( 658:) 654:5 651:( 645:) 641:1 638:( 552:. 451:: 376:9 372:8 368:7 364:6 360:5 356:4 352:3 348:2 344:1 341:: 327:· 321:· 315:· 309:· 301:· 295:· 289:· 283:· 277:· 271:· 265:· 259:· 184:. 132:. 77:4 73:3 69:2 65:1 45:· 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index