317:
301:
333:
285:
170:
61:
231:
220:
32:
128:
92:
442:, not today's wings. That number varies from 0 to 200 (early missiles were not installed in silos) and includes Snark, Titan and Atlas missiles. Particularly in view of the remainer of the quote, I doubt this web site can be regarded as a reliable source. I know of no missile wing that had more than 4 operational squadrons. (see
242:
209:
198:
471:
for
Strategic Missile Wings and their operational components). Even if the maintenance squadrons and the squadrons assigned to the wing's combat support group (if it had one), and the few wings with missile security groups were added on (and none of those "controll 10 silos") it would be hard to get
836:
thank you for clearly getting started on this Augean stable. Can see you've started with the air refueling wings. However, R.E. Mixer did get one thing right: our syntax for titles. Should for preference be in the form 'Air refueling wings of the United States Air Force' when you move or set up new
583:
If the change were only to the name and limiting the list to what its title says it is (contradicted in the first sentence of the lead by "This is a list of the three generations of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) produced and deployed by the United States during the Cold War, with a
42:
292:
102:
818:, which also redirects to the MAJCOM wing list. Even worse than the air base wing redirect, since SAC replaced its MAJCON air refueling wings with AFON wings in 1963. The strategic wing list is moved and inappropriate redirects nominated for elimination.
537:
That widening is up to you. Would you be prepared to add the additional content? You're our expert on this field. Otherwise would just go for something that decreases the overemphasis on SAC rather than the USAF as a whole (and avoids acronyms in a title).
324:
110:
647:/71.51.90.0 then (2007ish) about some of his absurd article arrangements; I tried to Prod the air base wings article; and I endorse any reasonable larger scheme of reorganisation you might consider, consistent with the below decision(s). Be bold.
584:
fourth generation ICBM deployed in small numbers at the end of the Cold War in 1991.") I would agree, but I do not agree if the article is changed to include missile wings in general. The principles of the limited change should also be applied to
340:
114:
514:
Sounds like a much better title to me. There were no USAF Strategic
Missile Wings not assigned to SAC. However, it strikes me that this article is a little narrow for an encyclopedia. Perhaps the article should be made more inclusive as
837:
pages. This is to avoid any implication or mistaken impression, even if very slight, that such a wing might be formally designated the 109th United States Air Force Air
Refueling Wing. Cheers, do ask for help or a second read if you wish.
948:
943:
601:
585:
495:
can this page have its scope widened properly to all
Strategic Missile Wings to avoid the USAF acronym in the title, with a move something like "List of Strategic Missile Wings of the United States Air Force?"
815:
589:
365:
This list is both overinclusive (it lists squadrons that were not assigned to missile wings) and underinclusive (it does not list either the 700 series wings nor the MAJCON wings in the 4000-4400 block of
308:
106:
968:
963:
597:
978:
973:
564:
I disagree that comments from others are needed on this super-super-super-super niche specialist page which probably gets hardly any views. I would encourage you to go ahead and be
183:
140:
609:
169:
593:
938:
550:
Yes. Even with the current content, I see my 2012 comments have been ignored. On the other hand, the change is major, and comments from others are needed. --
633:
874:
613:
881:
for deletion. Not only are the redirects inappropriate, they contain either no units or one unit meeting the criteria, which hardly maes a list. --
135:
97:
629:
878:
605:
958:
953:
144:
17:
516:
853:
The normal period for comments (one week) having elapsed without opposing comment, and without opposition, I'll go ahead with the move.
796:
You're the expert, you carefully follow Wiki conventions, I am double-checking your work, I suggest you go with what you think best.
457:
438:
The number of missiles controlled is generally true for today's
Minuteman missile wings, but the article is about wings assigned to
520:
72:
408:
Missile wings control about 150 silos. Each wing may be organized into up to 15 squadrons which would control 10 silos each.
921:
907:
890:
862:
844:
827:
803:
786:
769:
734:
695:
654:
575:
559:
545:
532:
503:
481:
394:
375:
748:
38:
744:
705:
620:, which was never assigned to SAC as a troop carrier unit. Needs speedy deletion) All these pages were created by
78:
672:
On the other hand, if we list all missile wings, I think comments on both the move and style are called for:
445:
139:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
628:
and Mr Moll appear to have made substantive changes to the page. In theat case the name should be either
617:
316:
704:
Should it be organized by numerical designation of the unit, like almost all other list articles? (thus:
917:
886:
858:
823:
782:
765:
730:
691:
555:
528:
477:
439:
371:
904:
841:
800:
651:
572:
542:
500:
31:
912:
Didn't know that page existed. But looking at the backlog there, I think I'll let things stand --
390:
568:, especially because no information will be *removed,* only *verified,* *checked,* and *added.*
424:
713:
709:
454:
565:
913:
882:
854:
833:
819:
778:
761:
726:
687:
644:
621:
551:
524:
492:
473:
367:
897:
637:
300:
901:
838:
797:
648:
580:
569:
539:
511:
497:
932:
625:
386:
332:
284:
18:
Talk:List of USAF Strategic
Missile Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command
385:
unreferenced, unencyclopedic language and full of repeat wiki links.--
634:
List of intercontinental missile wings of the United States Air Force
602:
List of USAF Reconnaissance wings assigned to
Strategic Air Command
586:
List of USAF Bomb Wings and Wings assigned to
Strategic Air Command
523:(BOMARC) and the couple of test and development wings (various). --
127:
91:
875:
List of USAF Troop
Carrier Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command
816:
List of USAF Air
Refueling Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command
743:
Or, should it be organized by weapons system (thus: TM-61 Matador
676:
Should it be in tabular form, like almost all other list articles?
614:
List of USAF Troop Carrier Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command
590:
List of USAF Strategic Wings assigned to the Strategic Air Command
519:
and include Tactical Missile Wings (Matador, Mace and GLCM); the
447:
Air Force Combat Wings, Lineage & Honors Histories 1947-1977
630:
List of strategic missile wings of the United States Air Force
54:
26:
879:
List of USAF Air Base Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command
606:
List of USAF Air Base Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command
404:
I removed the following sentence, which was added a day ago:
949:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
944:
List-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
598:
List of USAF Fighter Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command
331:
315:
299:
283:
168:
517:
List of Missile Wings of the United States Air Force
181:
This article has been checked against the following
969:
North American military history task force articles
964:
List-Class North American military history articles
610:
List of MAJCOM wings of the United States Air Force
293:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
266:
180:
979:United States military history task force articles
974:List-Class United States military history articles
636:(closer to what the article actually covers) for
594:List of United States Air Force strategic wings
453:. Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History.
425:"Planting ICBMs in Farm Fields during the 50s"
896:Grand. But for redirects, do not use WP:AfD.
8:
153:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
596:-- no other command had strategic wings);
472:over 12 squadrons in the largest wing. --
325:North American military history task force
263:
177:
86:
60:
58:
341:United States military history task force
133:This article is within the scope of the
416:
88:
143:. To use this banner, please see the
156:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
939:List-Class military history articles
41:on February 27, 2007. The result of
77:It is of interest to the following
616:(worst of all, it's a redirect to
588:(even worse than this "wings"?);
25:
608:(really bad, it's a redirect to
240:
229:
218:
207:
196:
126:
90:
59:
30:
600:(omits federalized ANG wings);
521:4751st Air Defense Missile Wing
444:Ravenstein, Charles A. (1984).
37:This article was nominated for
1:
482:17:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
959:Weaponry task force articles
954:List-Class weaponry articles
749:702nd Strategic Missile Wing
395:04:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
136:Military history WikiProject
487:Removing acronym from title
376:15:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
995:
745:38th Tactical Missile Wing
706:38th Tactical Missile Wing
201:Referencing and citation:
922:23:10, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
900:is a simplified process.
863:23:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
339:
323:
307:
291:
262:
159:military history articles
121:
85:
908:02:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
891:00:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
845:22:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
828:15:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
804:22:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
787:21:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
770:21:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
735:21:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
696:21:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
655:22:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
612:and should be deleted);
576:00:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
560:23:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
546:23:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
533:23:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
504:03:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
267:Associated task forces:
212:Coverage and accuracy:
618:456th Bombardment Wing
336:
320:
304:
288:
245:Supporting materials:
173:
67:This article is rated
440:Strategic Air Command
429:livinghistoryfarm.org
335:
319:
303:
287:
172:
71:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
814:Looks like I missed
747:, then SM-62 Snark
381:needs major rewrite
309:Weaponry task force
234:Grammar and style:
187:for B-class status:
337:
321:
305:
289:
174:
141:list of open tasks
73:content assessment
873:I have nominated
714:90th Missile Wing
710:44th Missile Wing
592:(an easy move to
358:
357:
354:
353:
350:
349:
346:
345:
258:
257:
247:criterion not met
214:criterion not met
203:criterion not met
145:full instructions
53:
52:
16:(Redirected from
986:
470:
468:
466:
452:
433:
432:
421:
400:Silos controlled
274:
264:
248:
244:
243:
237:
233:
232:
226:
222:
221:
215:
211:
210:
204:
200:
199:
178:
161:
160:
157:
154:
151:
150:Military history
130:
123:
122:
117:
98:Military history
94:
87:
70:
64:
63:
62:
55:
34:
27:
21:
994:
993:
989:
988:
987:
985:
984:
983:
929:
928:
871:
489:
464:
462:
460:
450:
443:
436:
423:
422:
418:
402:
383:
363:
272:
246:
241:
235:
230:
224:
219:
213:
208:
202:
197:
158:
155:
152:
149:
148:
100:
68:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
992:
990:
982:
981:
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
951:
946:
941:
931:
930:
927:
926:
925:
924:
870:
867:
866:
865:
850:
849:
848:
847:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
775:
774:
773:
772:
752:
751:
740:
739:
738:
737:
717:
716:
701:
700:
699:
698:
678:
677:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
643:I fought with
488:
485:
458:
435:
434:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
401:
398:
382:
379:
362:
359:
356:
355:
352:
351:
348:
347:
344:
343:
338:
328:
327:
322:
312:
311:
306:
296:
295:
290:
280:
279:
277:
275:
269:
268:
260:
259:
256:
255:
253:
251:
250:
249:
238:
227:
216:
205:
191:
190:
188:
175:
165:
164:
162:
131:
119:
118:
95:
83:
82:
76:
65:
51:
50:
43:the discussion
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
991:
980:
977:
975:
972:
970:
967:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
936:
934:
923:
919:
915:
911:
910:
909:
906:
903:
899:
895:
894:
893:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
851:
846:
843:
840:
835:
831:
830:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
812:
805:
802:
799:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
784:
780:
771:
767:
763:
759:
756:
755:
754:
753:
750:
746:
742:
741:
736:
732:
728:
724:
721:
720:
719:
718:
715:
711:
707:
703:
702:
697:
693:
689:
685:
682:
681:
680:
679:
675:
674:
673:
656:
653:
650:
646:
642:
641:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
582:
579:
578:
577:
574:
571:
567:
563:
562:
561:
557:
553:
549:
548:
547:
544:
541:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
513:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
502:
499:
494:
486:
484:
483:
479:
475:
461:
459:0-912799-12-9
456:
449:
448:
441:
430:
426:
420:
417:
410:
409:
407:
406:
405:
399:
397:
396:
392:
388:
380:
378:
377:
373:
369:
360:
342:
334:
330:
329:
326:
318:
314:
313:
310:
302:
298:
297:
294:
286:
282:
281:
278:
276:
271:
270:
265:
261:
254:
252:
239:
236:criterion met
228:
225:criterion met
217:
206:
195:
194:
193:
192:
189:
186:
185:
179:
176:
171:
167:
166:
163:
146:
142:
138:
137:
132:
129:
125:
124:
120:
116:
115:United States
112:
111:North America
108:
104:
99:
96:
93:
89:
84:
80:
74:
66:
57:
56:
48:
44:
40:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
872:
776:
757:
722:
683:
671:
490:
465:December 17,
463:. Retrieved
446:
437:
428:
419:
403:
384:
364:
182:
134:
79:WikiProjects
47:no consensus
46:
914:Lineagegeek
883:Lineagegeek
855:Lineagegeek
834:Lineagegeek
820:Lineagegeek
779:Lineagegeek
762:Lineagegeek
727:Lineagegeek
688:Lineagegeek
645:R. E. Mixer
622:R. E. Mixer
552:Lineagegeek
525:Lineagegeek
493:Lineagegeek
474:Lineagegeek
368:Lineagegeek
366:numbers).--
223:Structure:
933:Categories
902:Buckshot06
839:Buckshot06
798:Buckshot06
686:mildly. --
649:Buckshot06
581:Buckshot06
570:Buckshot06
540:Buckshot06
512:Buckshot06
498:Buckshot06
361:Inclusion.
103:Technology
69:List-class
869:Deletion
626:Wuerzele
387:Wuerzele
184:criteria
107:Weaponry
39:deletion
758:Support
708:, then
684:Support
566:WP:BOLD
905:(talk)
898:WP:RFD
842:(talk)
801:(talk)
723:Oppose
652:(talk)
638:WP:MOS
573:(talk)
543:(talk)
501:(talk)
75:scale.
832:Dear
491:Dear
451:(PDF)
918:talk
887:talk
877:and
859:talk
824:talk
783:talk
766:talk
731:talk
692:talk
624:and
556:talk
529:talk
478:talk
467:2016
455:ISBN
391:talk
372:talk
45:was
632:or
935::
920:)
889:)
861:)
826:)
785:)
777:--
768:)
760:--
733:)
725:--
712:,
694:)
640:.
604:;
558:)
531:)
480:)
427:.
393:)
374:)
273:/
113:/
109:/
105:/
101::
916:(
885:(
857:(
822:(
781:(
764:(
729:(
690:(
554:(
527:(
476:(
469:.
431:.
389:(
370:(
147:.
81::
49:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
