Knowledge

Talk:List of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft

Source đź“ť

1700:
splitting the page), and the media coverage available is significantly less, and isn't in the least way indicative of the significance of the accident. That has given this page an enormous bias toward modern accidents, belying the reality that 95% of all the significant accidents are missing, being deliberately excluded from here, but only because they fail to meet an incredibly pointless and artificial threshold. Perhaps for older aircraft it should be possible to link to a section of a page devoted to said accident? Alternatively, we split this page at 1945, and have less onerous criteria for incidents prior to then. Indeed, looking through most of the earlier accidents - most of those pages are barely even stubs, and should never have been made into separate articles, especially given the small size of almost all of the parent pages.
1997: 664: 292: 271: 449: 611: 600: 589: 578: 567: 713: 692: 381: 360: 539: 1951: 817: 789: 240: 473: 483: 1313:. Adding inclusion criteria to the lede is very common on many Knowledge lists. Including this information will communicate to readers that this list isn't alll- inclusive of every aviation mishap. And it will likely reduce the number of ineligible entries submitted - especially by users of mobile devices, who cannot see the notice above the edit box. 1045: 799: 795: 1371:. For editors using conventional computers, a notice appears above the edit box with a link to the project page. But for mobile editors, there is no edit box, so they never see this notice. How should the inclusion criteria be referenced in a way that is accessable to all readers, and editors who are using mobile devices? 1720: 1368: 1094: 1079: 1840:
says, "Generally, use past tense only for past events..." Present tense is generally favored in articles (e.g., "Obama and Trump are former US presidents," not "Obama and Trump were US presidents"), but not when describing events that have already happened. In the case of air crash articles, they are
1744:
As I said, in many cases, there isn't sufficient detail for both the accident and the aircraft type to justify a stand-alone page, least of all for aircraft whose entire entry won't EVER be much longer than a stub (and I know because I have expanded or written dozens of such pages), regardless of the
1740:
Your unnecessarily condescending reply that completely ignored what I wrote suggests a lack of reading comprehension. I already made suggestions as to what to do, above, and I also did NOT say there was no media coverage, or that there wasn't enough to determine significance, or that I had difficulty
1861:
something? I know some history buffs like to write in the present tense about battles and such, and that's fine, but we have a standardized Manual of Style here. I've changed 2022-now, and I'm going to pause here. If someone can justify this deviation from the MOS, I'll revert my own tense edits.
1699:
While the requirement for modern accidents to have their own standalone article makes sense due to the media intense environment that surrounded those incidents, this doesn't make any sense whatsoever for accidents prior to WW2, where the amount of detail, both for the aircraft itself (to justify
1422:
Summoned by bot. Yes, the inclusion criteria should definitely be explained in the lead. No article should be dependent on projectspace for context. No problem with the stylistic instructions there, or for an edit notice to emphasize certain practical elements (e.g. it has an article), but the
1860:
2024 had a mix of items in past and present tense, but the farther back I look, the more uniform the present tense becomes. Why is that? Historical events are in the past, not the present, and writing about them in the present tense affects readability and goes against the MOS. Am I missing
1578:
If you have a look of the Portuguese list, you will notice that the rules are different and this can cause confusion, I think this is terrible for Knowledge since the lists are translation but conceptually different and if so, must be renamed. Please have a look:
153: 44: 1719:. In the absence of media coverage, how do you propose to gauge the significance of such an accident? (For what it's worth, media coverage often exists, it's just harder to find on the Internet without access to academic databases.) Lastly, perhaps 1768: 1207:
Thanks for your thoughts, BillHPike. Do you know of a better way for an editor on a mobile device (cell phone, tablet) to know this page's inclusion criteria? These editors never see an edit box or the notice above this article's edit box.
210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 1616:
The rules here are quite clear. A aircraft must be able to seat 10 to be included on this list. You know something? The criteria, which have been in place over a decade, weren't even drawn up by me. Save your time for something
1423:
context to understand what's in the article should be in the article. It's not like there's a big lead here already. If it takes a couple paragraphs to explain (preferably with an explanation of why), that seems ok to me. —
1005:
What would be your reasoning for that? Is it because this article is getting unfeasibly long these days? There might be an argument for separating by decade, that would at least break it into about ten separate subarticles.
147: 1674: 1514:(Invited by the bot) I agree with Rhododendrites & Thryduulf including Rhododendrites's comments. I would add that projects don't own articles and can only influence, not dictate anything regarding articles. 1082:
exists. There is a link to this page above the edit box when editing with a conventional computer, but mobile edits don't see this notice. The MOS suggests adding direct statements about list criteria in the lede
1745:
actual importance of the event. You can see this in almost every accident listed prior to the 1930s - the accident should never have been split on any of them, except perhaps of the Fokker F.VII losing its wings.
1926:
Okay Guys, you completely forgot a passenger plane crashed in March 17th, so guys, if you are reading this, make a new article about this plane, this plane overran a runway. Type of the plane is a Let L-410UVP.
24: 1406:
The criteria are more than just having a WP article. Aircraft size and that it is a commercial flight are also criteria. Notable people sections (of town or city articles) have <!-- --: -->
1882: 673: 459: 1741:
in finding it, but rather that there isn't enough to justify more than a paragraph, and thus an entire stand alone page for the accident, and yes, I do know where to look. Massive difference.
1553: 1103:. I think a summary of the inclusion criteria in the lede would reduce ineligible entries, and help to communicate that this list is not all-inclusive of every aviation mishap. 2050: 1056: 431: 421: 1817:
There are more than a few more plane crashes in 2023 that yall have missed, so I am adding them. The entries are based on Category:Aviation accidents and incidents in 2023.
168: 135: 2045: 1767:
This one seems to be missing. I would add it, with a source citation, but the article meta editing text says not to do it without a full blown Wiki article in place.
1152: 1650:
Portuguese Knowledge and English Knowledge operate independtly from each other. There is zero need for the Portuguese and English lists to have the same criteria.
2065: 2060: 951:
describes the cases where bold face should be used. None of them apply here. It has no obvious significance and it looks horrendously ugly. So, I removed it all.
397: 1455:
Thanks everybody for the feedback. I have (for the fifth time) added the inclusion criteria to the lede. I think we have consensus from this discussion and from
922: 552: 538: 1338:
There is a clear consensus that the inclusion criteria should be defined in the article's lead and that it should not be dependent on projectspace for context.
129: 1769:"Raleigh-Durham International Airport and the pilot of a stricken CASA C-212 twin-engine turboprop light cargo plane involved in a fatal incident on July 29" 1052: 1277:
It seems that the point of contention is the use of a wikilink to the project page. I have updated the lede with inclusion criteria, but omitted this link.
125: 79: 388: 365: 175: 1387:, or placed where a commonly misinserted item would be inserted, with something like - <!-- Please don't incert incident A - see WP:ADL --: --> 966:
Sorry, no, it's been replaced. The significance is that in each sentence, the main target article is in bold, just like the Main Page. Cheers.
1841:
always in the past. (We don't learn about them until they've happened. If they haven't happened, we don't know that they will happen, so it's a
1147:
I've asked twice that you please discuss this matter. I'm going to go ahead and make the change I've described above, following the guidance in
2070: 2040: 767: 342: 332: 2080: 2055: 757: 85: 1978: 1818: 1795: 952: 141: 2085: 2035: 2020: 1986: 1936: 1916: 1890: 1870: 1854: 1826: 1807: 1780: 1754: 1732: 1709: 1689: 1659: 1644: 1625: 1609: 1568: 1525: 1503: 1485: 1468: 1450: 1432: 1415: 1401: 1380: 1322: 1300: 1286: 1267: 1235: 1217: 1202: 1168: 1135: 1112: 1068: 1038: 1028: 1015: 999: 975: 960: 937: 907: 891: 851: 1886: 2075: 872: 513: 1798:. Every “incident” need not include the hijackings or war-time events. Hat-notes can direct the readers to the pertinent lists. – 1717:...the media coverage available is significantly less, and isn't in the least way indicative of the significance of the accident. 733: 308: 1640: 1605: 1197: 99: 30: 495: 454: 104: 20: 1538:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1361:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
74: 223: 1685: 1564: 1156: 933: 251: 1791: 1183:
Do not create links to user, WikiProject, essay or draft pages in articles, except in articles about Knowledge itself.
729: 725: 720: 697: 299: 276: 65: 1670:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
1549:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
2008: 971: 500:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of 185: 1912: 1721:
Knowledge talk:List of accidents and incidents on commercial aircraft/Guideline for inclusion criteria and format
219: 1982: 1386:
Could comments not be used at the top of each year (so users editing a section see them) using <!-- --: -->
1064: 1011: 956: 501: 1822: 880: 1020:
Joy, 10 or more subarticles for me to put on watchlist so as to revert entries of accidents without articles.
1957: 1681: 1560: 1080:
Knowledge:List of accidents and incidents on commercial aircraft/Guideline for inclusion criteria and format
929: 903: 887: 109: 1932: 1842: 1728: 1148: 967: 868: 257: 2016: 1928: 1908: 1803: 1593: 860: 1632: 1597: 827: 663: 1836:
This article is full of present tense statements, as if these accidents and incidents are ongoing.
1636: 1622: 1601: 1521: 1499: 1482: 1464: 1446: 1438: 1425: 1412: 1376: 1318: 1297: 1292:
For about the fifth time, you have no consensus for this. What you're doing isn't done around here.
1282: 1263: 1232: 1213: 1193: 1164: 1151:. If you revert without responding here, then I'm going to have to file a complaint against you at 1131: 1108: 1060: 1025: 1007: 393: 161: 55: 396:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
307:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1474: 1396: 1341: 899: 883: 224: 70: 794:
The contents of this List article, including standardized format and style, are controlled by a
918:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
1456: 1306: 1249: 1084: 847: 51: 2004: 1866: 1850: 1750: 1724: 1705: 1666:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
1545:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
1345: 995: 864: 221: 2012: 2003:
it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a
1799: 507: 488: 1715:
What changes to the inclusion criteria do you propose? More specifically, you write that
1093:
includes relevant events that have a corresponding Knowledge article, and conform to the
1737:
Trust that the discussion isn't even on the page it applies to - thank you for the link.
1254:
A stand-alone list should begin with a lead section that summarizes its content and ...
1655: 1618: 1585: 1495: 1478: 1460: 1442: 1408: 1372: 1314: 1293: 1278: 1259: 1228: 1209: 1187: 1160: 1142: 1127: 1104: 1021: 291: 270: 2029: 1776: 1391: 1310: 1178: 1900: 1100: 843: 1037:
List of accidents and incidents on commerical airliners grouped by year listed at
987: 823: 472: 448: 1862: 1846: 1746: 1701: 1680:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
1559:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
1305:
Thanks for the reply, WilliamJE, but I disagree. What I'm doing is supported by
1126:
the inclusion of a link to the list criteria page in the lede, as stated above?
991: 928:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —
1905: 478: 380: 359: 1097:. The list is grouped by the year in which the accident or incident occurred. 1837: 1651: 712: 691: 1772: 948: 881:
https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_population
1044: 842:
This would be easier to extract information if it was a sortable table.
1053:
List of accidents and incidents on commerical airliners grouped by year
914:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
1580: 822:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
1675:
Wreckage of the ill-fated Dana Flight 992 on the 3rd of June 2012.jpg
1845:
issue.) This article needs a bit of fixing. I've done 2022-present.
857:
What do you mean by sortable table; could you elaborate a little?
1790:
We have articles which will pare down this "too-long" listing. See
947:
There is no need for every link in the article to be in bold face.
304: 1991:
I found another plane accident/incident you guys forgot to add.
1491: 1407:
at the top but editors routinely ignore them, don't read it etc.
1945: 1723:
would be a better forum for discussion of this topic. Cheers.
811: 783: 233: 225: 15: 1574:
The rules in this list is mismatched with the Portuguese list
1091:
list of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft
1051:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
25:
List of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft
1588:
Could you please have a look? I don't think it makes sense.
1227:
List criteria aren't explained in the lede part of articles.
1043: 662: 537: 1459:
that the inclusion criteria should indeed be in the lead.
732:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 1554:
Photo of McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30 LN-RK, Feb 1984.jpg
624: 986:
I think this article should be separated by year like
160: 1922:
Add Cetraca Aviation Service March 17 2024 Disaster.
898:
I too want a table for easy sorting. Any objections?
392:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 303:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1367:This list has its inclusion criteria in a separate 549: 1581:https://pt.wikipedia.org/Lista_de_acidentes_aéreos 1256:makes direct statements about the list criteria... 550:This article has not yet been checked against the 1901:https://avherald.com/h?article=516d7275&opt=1 1763:Raleigh-Durham Airport CASA C-212 fatal incident 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1877:Dhc-8 and Cessna 172 mid air collision in Kenya 1336: 1087:), and so I have proposed changing the lede to 1786:TLDR - parse out and reduce length suggestions 1441:said, and can't improve on how they said it. 650:assessing the article against each criterion. 174: 8: 1099:. But now I seem to be finding myself in an 1078:It's not obvious to all users that the page 2051:Mid-importance Disaster management articles 1942:Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2024 1906:https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/378591 724:, an attempt to structure and organize all 1118:Does anybody have a justifiable reason to 923:2019 Saha Airlines Boeing 707 crash 03.jpg 858: 686: 646:| b5<!--Supporting materials    --: --> 642:| b4<!--Grammar and style       --: --> 638:| b3<!--Structure               --: --> 634:| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --: --> 630:| b1<!--Referencing and citation--: --> 546: 443: 354: 265: 239: 237: 406:Knowledge:WikiProject Disaster management 1621:, is the complaint department really on 1481:, is the complaint department really on 1411:, is the complaint department really on 1296:, is the complaint department really on 1231:, is the complaint department really on 1024:, is the complaint department really on 809:Number of page views in the past 30 days 728:. If you wish to help, please visit the 627:the following code to the template call: 494:This article is within the scope of the 409:Template:WikiProject Disaster management 2046:List-Class Disaster management articles 688: 445: 356: 267: 1716: 1253: 1182: 1088: 512:. To use this banner, please see the 2066:Aviation accident task force articles 2061:List-Class Aviation accident articles 1896:Add 727 safe air crash in South Sudan 1883:2001:B07:A3B:23C1:B4AC:DB68:316D:43CB 7: 1796:List of airliner shootdown incidents 1355:The following discussion is closed. 718:This article is within the scope of 386:This article is within the scope of 297:This article is within the scope of 1437:Summoned by bot. I agree with what 623:To fill out this checklist, please 256:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1159:by reverting without discussing.— 14: 1832:Past tense needed for past events 1813:I have added more crashes to 2023 1534:The discussion above is closed. 1995: 1949: 815: 787: 711: 690: 609: 598: 587: 576: 565: 481: 471: 447: 379: 358: 290: 269: 238: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1494:. I have restored the RfC tag. 762:This article has been rated as 426:This article has been rated as 389:WikiProject Disaster management 337:This article has been rated as 1526:12:33, 21 September 2019 (UTC) 1504:03:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC) 1486:22:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC) 1469:21:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC) 1451:09:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC) 1348:) 00:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC) 522:Knowledge:WikiProject Aviation 1: 2071:WikiProject Aviation articles 2041:Mid-importance Death articles 1433:13:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC) 674:the Aviation accident project 671:This article is supported by 525:Template:WikiProject Aviation 400:and see a list of open tasks. 311:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2081:Low-importance List articles 2056:List-Class aviation articles 1871:01:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC) 1855:01:05, 30 January 2024 (UTC) 1660:10:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC) 1645:20:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC) 1626:21:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC) 1610:20:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC) 1477:. You're an involved editor. 976:21:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC) 961:20:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC) 938:18:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC) 412:Disaster management articles 1972:to reactivate your request. 1960:has been answered. Set the 1827:14:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC) 1792:List of aircraft hijackings 1755:07:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC) 1473:Your close is improper per 1416:09:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 1402:06:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 1381:02:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 1323:01:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 1301:22:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC) 1287:02:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC) 1268:01:33, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 1236:14:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC) 1218:02:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 1203:10:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC) 1169:02:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 1074:Explicit inclusion criteria 852:22:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC) 742:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists 317:Knowledge:WikiProject Death 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2102: 2086:WikiProject Lists articles 1937:08:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC) 1917:18:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC) 1781:13:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC) 1690:12:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC) 1569:07:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 1069:18:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC) 1000:01:32, 20 March 2019 (UTC) 908:20:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC) 892:20:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC) 879:I think like the one here 768:project's importance scale 745:Template:WikiProject Lists 570:Referencing and citation: 432:project's importance scale 343:project's importance scale 320:Template:WikiProject Death 2036:List-Class Death articles 2021:23:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 1987:23:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 1891:14:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC) 1808:18:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC) 1733:13:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC) 1710:17:05, 23 July 2022 (UTC) 1029:15:50, 7 April 2019 (UTC) 1016:15:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC) 761: 706: 670: 466: 425: 374: 336: 285: 264: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2076:List-Class List articles 1536:Please do not modify it. 1358:Please do not modify it. 1136:05:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC) 1113:18:25, 15 May 2019 (UTC) 1055:. Please participate in 1039:Redirects for discussion 1248:@WilliamJE Please read 1059:if you wish to do so. 1057:the redirect discussion 800:related discussion area 726:list pages on Knowledge 581:Coverage and accuracy: 2005:"change X to Y" format 1350: 1331:RfC inclusion criteria 1048: 667: 614:Supporting materials: 542: 246:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1047: 666: 541: 100:Neutral point of view 497:Aviation WikiProject 105:No original research 798:, with comments in 796:dedicated guideline 603:Grammar and style: 556:for B-class status: 403:Disaster management 394:Disaster management 366:Disaster management 1695:inclusion criteria 1682:Community Tech bot 1561:Community Tech bot 1157:disruptive editing 1095:inclusion criteria 1049: 930:Community Tech bot 668: 543: 252:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1976: 1975: 1631:Enjoy your list. 1596:comment added by 1201: 876: 863:comment added by 834: 833: 806: 805: 782: 781: 778: 777: 774: 773: 721:WikiProject Lists 685: 684: 681: 680: 657: 656: 647:= <yes/no: --> 643:= <yes/no: --> 639:= <yes/no: --> 635:= <yes/no: --> 631:= <yes/no: --> 528:aviation articles 514:full instructions 442: 441: 438: 437: 353: 352: 349: 348: 300:WikiProject Death 232: 231: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2093: 2011:if appropriate. 1999: 1998: 1967: 1963: 1953: 1952: 1946: 1612: 1430: 1428: 1399: 1394: 1390: 1360: 1191: 1146: 982:Separate Article 968:The Rambling Man 819: 818: 812: 791: 790: 784: 750: 749: 746: 743: 740: 715: 708: 707: 702: 694: 687: 651: 617: 613: 612: 606: 602: 601: 595: 591: 590: 584: 580: 579: 573: 569: 568: 547: 530: 529: 526: 523: 520: 491: 486: 485: 484: 475: 468: 467: 462: 451: 444: 414: 413: 410: 407: 404: 383: 376: 375: 370: 362: 355: 325: 324: 321: 318: 315: 294: 287: 286: 281: 273: 266: 249: 243: 242: 241: 234: 226: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2101: 2100: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2026: 2025: 2009:reliable source 1996: 1989: 1965: 1961: 1950: 1944: 1924: 1909:SignorPignolini 1898: 1879: 1843:WP:Crystal ball 1834: 1815: 1788: 1765: 1697: 1668: 1613: 1591: 1576: 1547: 1542: 1426: 1424: 1397: 1392: 1388: 1356: 1351: 1333: 1140: 1076: 1042: 984: 945: 916: 840: 835: 816: 788: 747: 744: 741: 738: 737: 700: 622: 615: 610: 604: 599: 593: 588: 582: 577: 571: 566: 527: 524: 521: 518: 517: 489:Aviation portal 487: 482: 480: 457: 411: 408: 405: 402: 401: 368: 322: 319: 316: 313: 312: 279: 250:on Knowledge's 247: 228: 227: 222: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2099: 2097: 2089: 2088: 2083: 2078: 2073: 2068: 2063: 2058: 2053: 2048: 2043: 2038: 2028: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2007:and provide a 1979:71.114.103.105 1977: 1974: 1973: 1954: 1943: 1940: 1923: 1920: 1897: 1894: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1833: 1830: 1819:113.210.92.159 1814: 1811: 1787: 1784: 1764: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1742: 1738: 1696: 1693: 1678: 1677: 1667: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1629: 1628: 1590: 1575: 1572: 1557: 1556: 1546: 1543: 1541: 1540: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1453: 1439:Rhododendrites 1435: 1427:Rhododendrites 1420: 1419: 1418: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1335: 1334: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1172: 1149:WP:DISCUSSFAIL 1075: 1072: 1061:Colonies Chris 1041: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1008:Rodney Baggins 983: 980: 979: 978: 953:80.189.156.156 944: 941: 926: 925: 915: 912: 911: 910: 896: 895: 894: 839: 836: 832: 831: 820: 807: 804: 803: 792: 780: 779: 776: 775: 772: 771: 764:Low-importance 760: 754: 753: 751: 716: 704: 703: 701:Low‑importance 695: 683: 682: 679: 678: 669: 659: 658: 655: 654: 652: 649: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 620: 619: 618: 607: 596: 585: 574: 560: 559: 557: 544: 534: 533: 531: 493: 492: 476: 464: 463: 452: 440: 439: 436: 435: 428:Mid-importance 424: 418: 417: 415: 398:the discussion 384: 372: 371: 369:Mid‑importance 363: 351: 350: 347: 346: 339:Mid-importance 335: 329: 328: 326: 323:Death articles 309:the discussion 295: 283: 282: 280:Mid‑importance 274: 262: 261: 255: 244: 230: 229: 220: 218: 217: 214: 213: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2098: 2087: 2084: 2082: 2079: 2077: 2074: 2072: 2069: 2067: 2064: 2062: 2059: 2057: 2054: 2052: 2049: 2047: 2044: 2042: 2039: 2037: 2034: 2033: 2031: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1971: 1968:parameter to 1959: 1955: 1948: 1947: 1941: 1939: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1921: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1895: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1839: 1831: 1829: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1812: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1785: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1762: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1694: 1692: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1676: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1627: 1624: 1620: 1615: 1614: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1589: 1587: 1583: 1582: 1573: 1571: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1555: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1544: 1539: 1537: 1532: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1518: 1513: 1512: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1434: 1429: 1421: 1417: 1414: 1410: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1400: 1395: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1362: 1359: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1330: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1311:MOS:BOLDAVOID 1308: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1258: 1257: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1237: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1199: 1195: 1190: 1189: 1184: 1180: 1179:MOS:LINKSTYLE 1176: 1173: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1144: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1096: 1092: 1086: 1081: 1073: 1071: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1046: 1040: 1036: 1030: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 964: 963: 962: 958: 954: 950: 942: 940: 939: 935: 931: 924: 921: 920: 919: 913: 909: 905: 901: 900:SqueakSquawk4 897: 893: 889: 885: 884:SqueakSquawk4 882: 878: 877: 874: 870: 866: 862: 856: 855: 854: 853: 849: 845: 837: 829: 828:MediaWiki.org 825: 821: 814: 813: 810: 801: 797: 793: 786: 785: 769: 765: 759: 756: 755: 752: 748:List articles 735: 731: 727: 723: 722: 717: 714: 710: 709: 705: 699: 696: 693: 689: 676: 675: 665: 661: 660: 653: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 628: 626: 621: 608: 597: 586: 575: 564: 563: 562: 561: 558: 555: 554: 548: 545: 540: 536: 535: 532: 515: 511: 510: 505: 504: 499: 498: 490: 479: 477: 474: 470: 469: 465: 461: 456: 453: 450: 446: 433: 429: 423: 420: 419: 416: 399: 395: 391: 390: 385: 382: 378: 377: 373: 367: 364: 361: 357: 344: 340: 334: 331: 330: 327: 310: 306: 302: 301: 296: 293: 289: 288: 284: 278: 275: 272: 268: 263: 259: 253: 245: 236: 235: 216: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2000: 1990: 1969: 1958:edit request 1925: 1904: 1899: 1880: 1835: 1816: 1789: 1766: 1698: 1679: 1669: 1630: 1592:— Preceding 1584: 1577: 1558: 1548: 1535: 1533: 1516: 1515: 1369:project page 1366: 1357: 1354: 1340: 1337: 1276: 1255: 1252:. It states 1224: 1186: 1174: 1123: 1119: 1090: 1077: 1050: 985: 946: 927: 917: 859:— Preceding 841: 808: 763: 730:project page 719: 672: 551: 508: 502: 496: 427: 387: 338: 298: 258:WikiProjects 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1725:Carguychris 1475:WP:RFCCLOSE 865:Dinosaur330 824:Phabricator 616:not checked 605:not checked 594:not checked 592:Structure: 583:not checked 572:not checked 509:task forces 148:free images 31:not a forum 2030:Categories 2013:Left guide 1962:|answered= 1929:CarterCart 1619:...William 1586:...William 1479:...William 1457:WP:SALLEAD 1409:...William 1307:WP:SALLEAD 1294:...William 1250:WP:SALLEAD 1229:...William 1085:WP:SALLEAD 1022:...William 734:discussion 503:open tasks 248:List-class 2001:Not done: 1838:MOS:TENSE 1771:Cheers. 1633:Pp.amorim 1623:the roof? 1598:Pp.amorim 1517:North8000 1496:Hadron137 1492:WilliamJE 1483:the roof? 1461:Hadron137 1443:Thryduulf 1413:the roof? 1373:Hadron137 1315:Hadron137 1298:the roof? 1279:Hadron137 1260:Hadron137 1233:the roof? 1210:Hadron137 1188:BillHPike 1161:Hadron137 1143:WilliamJE 1128:Hadron137 1105:Hadron137 1026:the roof? 943:Bold face 460:Accidents 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1747:- NiD.29 1702:- NiD.29 1641:contribs 1606:contribs 1594:unsigned 1393:OxonAlex 1198:contribs 1101:edit war 949:MOS:BOLD 873:contribs 861:unsigned 844:Tom Ruen 553:criteria 519:Aviation 455:Aviation 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1800:S. Rich 1490:Thanks 1120:support 826:and on 766:on the 430:on the 341:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1863:Dcs002 1847:Dcs002 1398:- talk 1342:Cunard 1225:Oppose 1175:Oppose 1124:oppose 992:Si Gam 838:Table? 254:scale. 126:Google 1966:|ans= 1956:This 1881:add 1617:else. 1089:This 990:. -- 739:Lists 698:Lists 314:Death 305:Death 277:Death 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2017:talk 1983:talk 1933:talk 1913:talk 1887:talk 1867:talk 1851:talk 1823:talk 1804:talk 1794:and 1777:talk 1751:talk 1729:talk 1706:talk 1686:talk 1656:talk 1652:SSSB 1637:talk 1602:talk 1565:talk 1522:talk 1500:talk 1465:talk 1447:talk 1377:talk 1346:talk 1319:talk 1309:and 1283:talk 1264:talk 1214:talk 1194:talk 1177:per 1165:talk 1155:for 1132:talk 1109:talk 1065:talk 1012:talk 996:talk 988:this 972:talk 957:talk 934:talk 904:talk 888:talk 869:talk 848:talk 506:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1964:or 1773:N2e 1431:\\ 1389:~~ 1153:ANI 1122:or 758:Low 625:add 422:Mid 333:Mid 176:TWL 2032:: 2019:) 1985:) 1970:no 1935:) 1915:) 1889:) 1869:) 1853:) 1825:) 1806:) 1779:) 1753:) 1731:) 1708:) 1688:) 1658:) 1643:) 1639:• 1608:) 1604:• 1567:) 1524:) 1502:) 1467:) 1449:) 1379:) 1321:) 1285:) 1266:) 1216:) 1196:, 1185:— 1181:, 1167:) 1134:) 1111:) 1067:) 1014:) 998:) 974:) 959:) 936:) 906:) 890:) 875:) 871:• 850:) 458:: 209:, 205:, 201:, 197:, 193:, 156:) 54:; 2015:( 1981:( 1931:( 1911:( 1885:( 1865:( 1849:( 1821:( 1802:( 1775:( 1749:( 1727:( 1704:( 1684:( 1654:( 1635:( 1600:( 1563:( 1520:( 1498:( 1463:( 1445:( 1375:( 1344:( 1317:( 1281:( 1262:( 1212:( 1200:) 1192:( 1171:. 1163:( 1145:: 1141:@ 1130:( 1107:( 1083:( 1063:( 1010:( 994:( 970:( 955:( 932:( 902:( 886:( 867:( 846:( 830:. 802:. 770:. 736:. 677:. 516:. 434:. 345:. 260:: 211:6 207:5 203:4 199:3 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
List of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
2
3
4
5
6

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑