Talk:List of fictional antiheroes/Archive 1

4330:

matter how many people disagree? It seems there is a much higher threshold for getting a character removed than put on. This seems 180 degree opposite to the way it needs to be. In order to provide reasonably accurate information, then it seems that there should be some consensus on the justification. Leatherface, Hannibal, Freddy ... these are villains, not anitheroes! What did Freddy ever do that was heroic? He was a clever-witted villain, but that hardly makes him heroic. Likewise, Hannibal was never interested in helping anyone. Likewise, I am a great fan of "Seinfeld", but I fail to see how George Castanza should be on the list. He may have been a sympathetic character, but heroic (saving the beached whale not withstanding)? On the other hand, what about Andy Sipowicz from "NYPD Blue". At least in the early seasons, his alcoholism was his demon, and his flaws are what set the show apart and redefined the cop drama; in some ways, it ushered in an era of antihero dramas ... but I cannot definitely say that Sipowicz that he was an antihero b/c, beyond drinking (and his temper) what were his flaws. He could, in fact, be construed as a traditional hero, or at least in the mold of Batman. Back to the original point ... it seems that more consideration could be given to him, and to others, and the list could be pruned!

701:

an opinion expressed in any Encyclopedia article, if only editorial policy such as what to include, the form that articles must have, etc. From the aricle history you seem to act as de facto editor (in the publishing sense not just WP sense) for that article. Well, when you look down that list, you don't get a sense of what a anti-hero is. You seem to subscribe to the idea that it is not definable. That's proper not for an encyclopedia neither for an editor. It's not too bad for me but too bad for the article and ultimately too bad for the readers. That's who the article should be written for. Being a protagonist is not enough to take on heroic qualities. You cannot gloss over the fact that the public in general doesn't see Lecter as a anti-hero and that this is enough to make the categorisation wrong. This categorisation is clearly your opinion and you chose the excuse that another said it to impose it. I don't intend to bother with an article that is someone's private ground.--

4418:

AH, that's sufficient; but that does not account for the fact that the writer of the article is a) espousing POV themselves and b) may be confused over the meaning to begin with (again, Freddy and Batman are prime examples). While most of the list is accurate, I don't believe many people would find Freddy to be heroic in any capacity; Batman is a little more gray, but seems to be a traditional hero. Yes someone cited them as AH in an article, but ... circular argument. I agree that, because it can be subjective, that one person should not get "veto power". But is it not reasonable to offer up any contradiction to discussion on this page (with or w/o a caveat on the main page)? Sfter a period of time, a consensus is liable to emerge. In the event of lack of agreement, then the default action would be to leave it posted (again, possibly w/ a qualifier). This would be a simple check-and-balance and a compromise to many who have raised the issue over the years. Just an idea.

2961:

a list of fictional anti-heros is almost ridiculous in itself, but clearly ill-informed people don't understand what an anti-hero really is and movie reviews(which, I might add, don't really take any kind of journalist training to write and does not make a person a professional critic) and other examples I gave previously fall into this category. All I am saying, and I know that plenty of other people agree, is that if you and your friend want to take the role of "main editors," use some common sense. I would actually have no problem with non-cited examples because of the nature of Knowledge (XXG), but because this is important to the two of you, maybe you should make it a little more professional. I have no qualms with the fact that you insist there should be sources. (And by the way, not all academic papers are biased. English, Philosophy, and other subjective arts might be, but scientific papers make it a point to avoid bias.)

4842:

anti-heroe list. The right thing to do would be to ask the creator of that character and find out what he thinks, then conduct a voting to see if that caracter really is an anti-heroe and be included in the list. But if we did that, we would all grow nice and long beards and our social life would be reduced to 0. So, even tough I might think a character X is not an antiheroe, if someone whose opinion is relevant thinks this character X is in fact an anti-heroe, then it is has the right to be listed here, and to be removed, the relevant person who thinks character X is an anti-heroe should be convinced otherwise, not us here in wikipedia. Until the day comes that we have an easy way to define an anti-heroe (word that keeps changing as our society also does) we will have to keep a very long, inacurate list.

503:? I think, comparing video games to literature, that playability is equal to readability, and the games story is a moot point. Many books have been made into games, and even vice versa. I feel they belong as much as any other fictional characters. Second, demanding citations for everything is just silly. How would you citate something like this? Is there an official bureau for the listing anti-heroes? Which "source" would "people" find "credible"? Think about it... it is like demanding a source on the statement that most people like candy. Okay, exaggarated example, but you get my drift. As for new additions to the list running the risk of coming out of control... well, it is always modifiable and we can discuss the inclusions to a great degree on this very page. -- 2897:

not unbiased. Period. Neither are booklists or movielists (even in a newspaper), personal webpages, or descriptions of movies or books by a retailer. I don't know what you learned in fifth grade about research papers, but that doesn't cut it. That's the worst thing about an open-source encyclopedia. Anyone can edit it or take over a page and constantly edit it to their liking, and they don't know shit about research and un-biased journalism. And for christ-shakes! The US education system needs to put more effort into their teaching of correct grammar, spelling, and punctation! (And don't either of you try to give me "we have the disclaimer" crap. That disclaimer invalidates the whole source idea. You don't want

4497:"reliable sources only" - anything with a source is being accepted unconditionally, with no one checking to see that the sources are reliable. I don't remember all the precise nuances of the sourcing policies, but some of the entries are sourced only by sites so obviously unreliable that they make blogs look like the pinnacle of accuracy by comparison (and there's at least a few blogs among the crop too), and some other source links lead to 404 errors. Recall that the sourcing policy requires that sources be vaguely reputable sites, not just the results of a Google search for anti-hero and a character's name. Examples of bad sources include 141 and 150 (seriously, how did a source with "Animated Lust" in the 2535:

Alex DeLarge's source states "Clint Eastwood's Harry Callahan from the Dirty Harry movies is fourth , ahead of Alex DeLarge, played by Malcolm McDowell, from controversial film A Clockwork Orange". He's not even the focus of the article, and its mentioned briefly. Holden Caulfield's? "...was intercut with a series of short films that featured an actor playing Salinger's adolescent antihero, Holden Caulfield." Yet again, only a 'passing reference'. For Snape: "It may be that we have finally seen which way the wind is blowing with the brooding anti-hero Professor Snape." Yet again, another passing reference. I could go on and find some more, but you get the picture.

4484:

consensus. It boils down to this, keep this list sourced and it will stay (hopefully), let it become a list of original research and POV and it will be deleted quickly. Sources are also good because most of the "obvious" anti-heroes we'd all agree on have a source out there anyway, you just have to look for a bit. The drawback is that some more controversial ones also appear. I believe the points you raise are discussed elsewhere on this page (specifically POV of reviewers vs POV of WP editors, and inclusion through consensus). Personally, I like the list, I think it's useful, and I think following this system is the only way it will stay on Knowledge (XXG). --

2748:

comes across as a self-pitying jackass who refuses to take responsibility for his own actions." It occured to me that although it suggests he isn't an anti hero, the fact is he is described as having the same characteristics as one. I found some other official reviews, but they don't specifically mention the phrase "anti hero" and are therefore no more or less help than that review. Also seeing as Solid Snake claiming to fight for himself and no one else is a quote from the game, does that need a website as a reference? Or will just stating that its referencing a quote in the game do?

5029:(2) It is actively misleading. The definition of anti-hero, as given on wikipedia, requires that the character be a protagonist. This page includes the phrase "Characteristics in protagonists that merit such a label include...", which further infers that an anti-hero must be a protagonist. Therefore, a reader of the article could very easily conclude, for example, that Gollum is the (or a) protagonist of Lord of the Rings. That is factually incorrect, although of course it's hard to find an article that states specifically that Gollum isn't a protagonist. 4892:. I've found that many people don't think he's an anti-heroe because he's a normal guy (actually, more of a mediocre guy). People tend to think that anti-heroe is a very powerful (heroic) guy but that is selfish and egocentric, doing good things only if he gets some profit off them. That would be a kind of anti-heroe, but not the only one; an antiheroe might also be some mediocre guy who runs away from his problems instead of fearlessly confronting them. I will provide the sources for this one, but I'd prefer someone added it, since I'm no expert at it. 4885:

there are like 7 or 8. I'm not sure we can use their sources since they are most possibly in spanish, but I'm going to list some of them, so we can get up there on this list some anime and manga characters who are clear stereotypes of what an antiheroe would be (properly sourced and verified). As a quick comment, the fact that manga and comic are considered diferent things, I find useful, since many manga have their anime version and listing it all together saves having the same guy in diferent places.

2047:

I'm removing ones that are not, in fact, sources. The Independent source says, "Iago- He's the worst villain of all," and nothing about being an anti-hero. Ditto for the writersstore.com, which is about Othello being an anti-hero. The random geocities page (questionable as a source to begin with...) also says nothing about Iago as an anti-hero, and talks at length about what a great villain he is. That being said, the thestage.co.uk, dailyinfo.co.uk and filmeducation.org sources all, bafflingly enough,

488:. In addition, video games are generally not included in literary/fictional canon, as they are very subjective and not critically reviewed in the same context as literature, film, or even television. At this rate the list will probably continue to grow without any sources being added and eventually be nominated for deletion. Try to provide references or sources for existing examples, or remove them, before adding even more if you want the list to last. Just some advice, and my own opinions. -- 3632:

Snape is whom I could view as the arch-typical anti-hero. I would also cite The Punisher over Batman due to the latter’s qualms about killing. Batman’s reluctance to kill is a traditional hero standard that The Punisher eschews in order to bring about his sense of justice. By setting a standard for what characters should be included as anti-heroes and adding only characters that fit the definition will we properly demonstrate our definition, which is the purpose of this list/article.

1750:

protagonist or notable figure who is conspicuously lacking in heroic qualities" As he matches ALL those definitions, he can be clasified as an antihero. The only main characteristic he has is his pride. His honor itself is merely an aspect of his pride. Before you start wondering WHY all those definitions, I have wondered the same, and I must admit, they can be confusing. It seems to me that the only type of character who can't be classified as an antihero is a traditional hero.

307:

Paradise Lost. I'm not sure if Milton intended to make him an anti-hero, but it sure seemed that way to me when I first read the thing in college. I didn't want to edit this choice into the main page because as an atheist living in the USA, a major source of wikipedia readers, I know only too well how easily this religious stuff sets off flame wars on the internet. People might have problems with me labeling Satan as a "hero," or that I've put him into a list of

2611:), but I think you see where I'm going. Can you require literary sources (which would assume credibility) for this kind of thing; is that against wikipedia rules? Anyways, this is just one idea on how to cleanup. Like I said, my intention is just to reflect anti-hero accurately. I guess I really don't care if some quasi-antiheroes are on there, but some clear 'good' examples would really elevate the list in my opinion. Any other ideas to achieve the goal?-- 31: 3771:

right? I understand what your trying to say. But read that article. It's not even about Hitch Hikers guide, Arthur Dent is mentioned in one sentence, the term "anti-hero" is thrown in willy nilly without any statement to back up how Arthur Dent is actually an anti-hero. I'm all for properly sourced facts, but this is not a fact, it's a poor source, it doesn't support it's case at all. Don't you understand? This should totally be removed.

4693:

of reminding myself of the value of fantasy (at that time, I had never been published; never written any fantasy, and almost never read any worthwhile fantasy; Tolkien, Lewis and Peake were the exceptions). So I certainly was not looking for any kind of antidote for Hobbittitis. I was looking for Donaldson -- trying to explore the kinds of things that moved/excited/convinced me, with as little reference as possible to anybody else.

806:. Although I haven't seen the films in question, I'm guessing the characters qualify as anti-heroes not because of redemptive qualities but simply because they are the focus of the films, the same justification is used for others like Shakespeare's Richard III, and the two mentioned above. The term "anti-hero" is a complex term and can be applied to a vast array of characters, regardless of their relative moral reprehensibility. -- 1137:

pointed out, seems dubious and 3DRealms even disparages it. The main thing is just pulling a quote from reputable, large scale sites like gamespot or ipc (I'm not too sure about video games but those seem the most reputable). Getting sources is just a formality (and with video games it's slightly more lenient) but it helps maintain higher standards, and with obvious cases you can usually find a source pretty quickly. --

2022:

dead, and the other's only reference to Iago at all is the line, "'Othello' is focused on jealousy and is all about the destruction of the Moor by his servant, Iago." Which is a paragraph discussing characters like MacBeth or Othello as anti-heroes. So, unless there's some new school of thought reimagining Iago as an anti-hero instead of Othello (and can be cited), I think he's a misleading and bad example.

2199:

own personal opinion. There are a lot of characters here who I don't like. Am I going to remove them? No, because they have sources. And there are a lot characters I'd like to add, but am I? No, because I can't find any sources. Which is why it bothers me when people try to remove cited entries on the basis of their own personal opinion. Whether or not you think Leatherface or Tony Soprano or Hannibal or

2355:"In fiction, the anti-hero is the protagonist who is lacking the traditional heroic attributes and qualities — courage, idealism, fortitude — and possessed of character traits — ineptness, stupidity, dishonesty — that are antithetical to heroism. Typically, the anti-hero acts heroically, in scale and daring, but by methods, manners, and intentions both fair and foul, even underhanded and deceitful." 540:". With popular culture the standards for sources are much more lenient, but verifiability with something as inherently subjective as this is still important. It doesn't need to be a government, United Nations, or Harvard document to qualify as a reliable source, but we still need an external source and simply discussing every objectionable addition here would still amount to original research. 4502:

hundred sources, but more importantly because all I'd be able to get rid of are the most obvious glaring problems, and then you'd go back to just rubber-stamping anything with a source. I'm leaving them for the article's dedicated caretakers to clean up so you can see just how bad it is and not only fix everything but adopt a more critical policy toward additions in the future.

2922:. I didn't come up with that rule, the community did. In regards to the claim that movie reviews are biased, that's arguable and depends on your definition of bias but of course they are opinion-oriented, most (or arguably all) articles/academic papers/reviews inherently are since they represent the views of the author. You're correct that a single person cannot single handedly 1040:, a well known video game character, be an anti-hero? I mean he's willing to save the world from destruction but has a lot of flaws such as his love for constant drinking, cigar smoking, gun firing, alien killing and destruction, and womanization of strippers and prostitutes as well as generally arrogant, cocky, and seemingly carefree attitude about things. What do you think? 2669:

the list. The reason the list is imperfect and includes some objectionable examples is due to the problems inherent in the usage of the term "anti-hero" in popular discourse which is beyond our control. This list never has been and never will be perfect, but maintaining the Knowledge (XXG) standard of verifiability is what has and will (hopefully) keep it alive.

2990:

through your actions and even the very fact that you felt you must justify yourself telling a person they couldn't add something to a domain that is not your own. Other than that, I have no problem with sources, it's the type of stuff that you consider sources. (And your well-endowed user page shows your presence on Knowledge (XXG) is not merely passing.)

4440:

why similar articles have been deleted in the past was that people just added and removed characters at random because they agreed/disagreed with their placement on the list. If we get to the point where we decide to remove characters because we disagree with their placement (even if we 'vote') then we're just back to the same place as before.--

3581:

heroic ends and questionable means. This is also why I disagree with Knowledge (XXG)’s stance on neutrality relating to this article. If people are referencing this article for an understanding of what an anti-hero is and using Gollum from Lord of the Rings as an example compared with Severus Snape from Harry Potter they might become confused.

219:. As I said, it's rare, and usually used incorrectly, but occasionally actual people (in politics and entertainment mostly) are dubbed anti-heroes, usually based on public persona. I'm not surprised that someone was unconvinced, but it happens, and adding "fictional" to the title doesn't really have any drawbacks in my opinion. -- 2501:

point as you accurately stated is moot. I did not edit the list, nor would I edit the list without consensus (as some may strongly feel he is an antihero). Even simply removing , and would be preferable, as those citations, in my opinion, are so illegitimate as to detract from the argument for Leatherface’s inclusion.--

2279:

second purpose. It would be very hard to even argue that he is the protagonist, much less the hero of the films. I will admit that I have only seen the original film and the new prequel, but, unless the old sequels or new version pose some drastic overhaul of his character, he needs to be stricken from this list. -CawH

138: 3540:. I don't know if any of those links are valid. The first two don't call him such, wiki pages aren't used for sources, and I don't think the youtube videos (which I haven't viewed yet) would be good either unless its of a creator/reviewer calling him one. I did a quick google search for you but nothing valid came up.-- 5022:

person did write an article entitled "Mary Poppins is an anti-hero" (not impossible - they may be saying, for example, that Mary Poppins' old fashioned values are the antithesis of what we expect from a 21st century hero), there would be no article to contradict is. This would, of course, not imply consensus.

5021:

It's also worth pointing out that it's basically impossible for a counterpoint to that statement "x is an anti-hero" to exist in an article. For example, nobody is going to write an article saying "Mary Poppins is not an anti-hero", simply because it's something that everyone knows already. So if one

4692:

In writing COVENANT, I was certainly aware that I was working in Tolkien's shadow (after all, his shadow covers most of the field). But I took LORD OF THE RINGS as a source of inspiration, rather than as any kind of counter-argument or antithesis. I read Tolkien while I was planning COVENANT as a way

4439:

The article doesn't pretend to be undisputed fact. The 'disclaimer' points out that these characters have all been identified as an antihero by a critic, but that the definition is subjective, and that the identifications may be disputed and/or contradict the known definition. One of the main reasons

3810:

I know for a fact that Winslow Leach from 'Phantom of the Paradise' is an anti-hero. He's the protagonist of the film; he is falsely imprisoned, has his teeth removed, and after a horrible accident he is disfigured and forced to hide in a costume in the attic of a discoteck. Further bad things happen

3297:

ben Linus is an anti-villain, not anti-hero. He is certainly the main antagonist of Lost and doesn't do gestures by non-heroic deeds. He is noble and does what he thinks is right for the wrong reasons. He's certainly not an anti-hero, although he does have potential to become one. He is by definition

3188:

If I recall, wasn't Alastor casted as the Anti-Hero for Viewtiful Joe? I think the game might have even stated so, as it has a tendency to mock itself for being cliche in regards to silver-screen archetypes. I know that if Leatherface through some twisted mockery of the definition of Anti-hero can be

3008:

Of course I assumed that you were speaking to me. You write "two people on here seem to have enough time to decide what gets posted". Me and TM are the two main contributors to this article. I think Doczilla pops up to regulate it but not as much. Unless you wouldn't mind telling me who else "the two

2989:

That's interesting that you automatically assumed I was speaking of you. Obviously you do think that you have some authority over the page, when it is a open-source encyclopedia of which no one should consider themselves the main editor. I'm not putting words into your mouth, I am simply explaining

2979:

characters I don't like who I haven't touched on account of there being valid sources. The only personal bias I see are people trying to remove cited entries based on their personal preferences. As for having enough time to moderate this page...it literally takes all of five seconds to check the most

2668:

First off I agree that Leatherface is not an anti-hero, but as has been repeated to death on this talk page, the opinions of editors do not factor into the inclusion of characters. Only including examples backed up by a reliable source is the strength (and sometimes, as in this case, the weakness) of

2568:

I just want the list to reflect the true definition of anti-hero, which as defined on the list itself is unclear. I really would like input as to what you think, as you seem to disagree with a lot of the so-called 'anti-heroes' placement as well. Do you know if there is an anti-villain list (as many

2070:

Sorry for misinterpreting you then...there have been numerous cases where people try to remove cited additions from this list because people don't like them, so I just jumped to the wrong conclusion. As for editing the Iago article, I did add a quote from Andy Serkis that somewhat shows him more than

2046:

felt like he didn't belong, that's just how I noticed it. I removed it because of the two sources, one was dead and the other said nothing about Iago being an anti-hero. I don't think I did anything wrong by "acting this way" and removing unsourced references. Anyway, as for the sources you've added,

1689:

Sorry about that earlier post. But, as the rules go, you need at least one reliable source. If not, anyone can add anyone just because they think they fit the criteria. I've never played Star Fox, but Wolf does seem to fit the criteria, so finding a source should be easy. But adding a character based

1667:

Honestly, it is ridiculous to require a source other than the game itself. The video game is a primary source openly displaying anti-heroic qualities for Wolf O'Donnell (The rest of his team is iffy, as they generally abide by his orders). There has to be a point where one source is enough, otherwise

1414:

Please add Star Wolf in the list. While they are "just goons" in the Star Fox 64, they slowly become anti-heroes (and even allies) in the next games. This is more highlighted in Star Fox Assault, where Wolf advices Fox which later helped in the hero's struggles. In Star Fox Command, Star Wolf team is

991:

Sorry to be curt but your own opinion (and mine) doesn't have any merit in terms of what to include in this article: we have a reliable source claiming he's an anti-hero and that's all that's needed. Second, you don't seem completely clear on what an anti-hero is based on your objections. Third, this

979:

I don't think Batman is actually an anti-hero. True he works with a mask and at night and he can be a bit dark, but in the comics he's in league with the GCPD. Furthermore he disapproves of some other masked vigilantes and their more agressive means of handling things - like Huntress and Azrael. He's

700:

That's the point I am trying to make. Namor as a anti-hero is not my opinion. It is an opinion stated so many times by so many different persons that its omission was a glaring mistake. Also I doubt you could find many people that disagree. In other words there is a consensus. Second, there is always

582:

I added some images since I though the article was looking a little dull. I tried to use the most iconic examples instead of more obscure or contemporary ones, as well as those which have articles discussing their anti-heroic attributes. Any thoughts on replacing them, getting rid of them etc. can go

5035:

If we are going to say that Gollum, Flagg and the rest are anti-heroes, then the main anti-hero page should be changed to the appropriate definition (which apparently is "any character who isn't pure good or pure evil", based on the list). Otherwise, this list needs to be either properly filtered or

4884:

Given the extreme amount of manga (and to a lesser extent) anime, I find the section is quite sad, as only 3 characters are listed. Maybe we could get some more anime/manga characters up there, since I think even the Spanish wikipedia has more (I could have said any other language, but I'm spanish);

4861:

may possess to qualify. That, in itself, does not explicitly exclude antagonists, but the general tone is that it only includes protagonists, and the general feeling to readers may very well be that all of the people on the list are such. I'm not arguing about including villains on the list (which

4678:

Ah, where to begin? Let me say first that I shudder every time anybody compares / contrasts COVENANT with LORD OF THE RINGS. Of course, my respect for Tolkien is unbounded, so in that sense I suppose I should feel flattered. But comparisons / contrasts are often odious to the people being compared /

4655:

I added a literary character: Thomas Covenant, the Unbeliever from Stephen R. Donaldson fantasy series. I think he is an excellent example of an anti-hero, but my source may be a bit weak. It's from a fan site of the novels. An introduction page describes this character as "anything but a typical

4417:

Looks like this is the same conversation that's been going on for years on this board! Given that, I will digress, but for this last post. Joseph Heller's words seem appropriate here: "There was only one catch and that was Catch-22" ... so long as I can find one article that describes someone as an

3839:

The easiest way for me is just to do a google search. It doesn't have to be a major thing, just a reference in a professional interview, review or article. (For example, a review by the Boston Globe could say "As the antihero Sweeney Todd, Johnny Depp steals the show" and that would be enough) But I

2960:

That post about in-print citations was just as you named it--a joke. But in all seriousness, let's not get into the complexity of the fact that there cannot be a paper written without any sort of bias. Clear bias is a movie review. An informative article is not. Let's excuse the fact that making

2934:

So, what would you like to see done? Would you like us all to review the citations and only stick to highly regarded sources (The Guardian, The New York Times)? You suggested only citing in-print sources which, as an academic elitist, I might support since it would likely do away a lot of examples I

2926:

label an anti-hero, since, as has been repeated, this is a slippery and subjective term and means different things to different people. The decision as to what is biased and un-biased is a very grey area; one person's biased piece is another's unbiased piece. Attempting to weed out "biased" articles

2896:

mean that the character is an anti-hero. It would make more sense if you used un-biased sources (if the sources is your basis on choosing who to delete off the page, since both of you have taken the roles of unofficial mods) and at least two of these un-biased sources were cited. Movie reviews are

2747:

Which I think is official, it says near the bottom "The Prince in Warrior Within is a bitter, deeply angry man who's only out to save his own ass and he really doesn't care who he has to run over in the process. The result is that, rather than being a "dark" and "gritty" anti-hero, the Prince merely

1120:

The second one is an archived news piece from the 3DR website that quotes another now defunct link or website which itself is, as you would put it, may not be reliable. But the fact that 3DR put it there with the "anti-hero" word indicates to me that they agree with the term because they could have

325:

is/can be seen as an anti-hero there shouldn't be any problem in adding him to the list. And don't worry, flame wars here aren't very widespread since Knowledge (XXG) isn't a discussion forum and there are policies against it. Also, as a sidenote, I rarely see religion strongly influencing articles,

306:

This subject is highly interesting, but also very subjective, and therefore the list here is very incomplete. I've got an interesting addition, an "ultimate anti-hero" of sorts, which I would like to throw out here in the Talk page first. My ultimate anti-hero is, of course, Lucifer as depicted in

4483:

Just to weigh in, basically the article that existed before this was deleted for not having any sources. Verifiability is one of the major things Knowledge (XXG) strives for. We can't decide what's true in the case of anti-heroes, just like we can't all sit around and rewrite history through editor

4073:

at IGN for Lelouch, which should be good enough to list him here. It reads "With this power and his impressive intellect, he becomes the quintessential anti-hero with a cold willingness to use any means necessary to achieve his noble goal of destroying the Empire." I haven't found anything reliable

3770:

It's not about disagreeing with the source, it's about the source not being a proper one. Here, I'll give an example for the slow witted. If I was to go into the earth article and claim that over 90% of the earth is made of snow, and then use a Peanuts comic strip as my source... would that make it

2974:

So many times someone comes on here and goes, "Can I add this character? He's cool. I think he's an antihero." I just point out that for it to be a valid site it needs a published source. In one case, I actually helped someone find a source. And sometimes someone might add an unsourced entry, which

2548:

To maintain Knowledge (XXG) as a credible source it must be based on credible sources. And if you read my previous entry you would see I have a problem with 90% of the entries here. I think the whole list is flawed, people can't see the difference between an anti-hero and an anti-villain apparently

2198:

do is find a cited review and properly quote the critic as in "Roger Ebert wrote 'This movie is horrible'" and so forth. The same goes with this. The page itself says its disputed, but as long as it has a cited source, it can stay. But you can't remove or add characters from this list based on your

1156:

characters are bitchy outlaws and certainly antiheroes, but I've been modest and only inserted Kerr Avon as the most obvious one. I was surprised not to see any B7 characters on the TV list, considering how much the "bunch of criminals bickering in space" concept influenced later tv sci-fi, notably

907:

There's not a shortage of articles calling the Rejects antiheroes. Time wrote "The much tattooed 42-year-old director's last effort, the mordantly witty 2005 horror pic The Devil's Rejects, revealed the metal singer/director's knack for coaxing a certain grisly charm out of his homicidal antiheroes

878:

I just want to point out that only one of the sources for this argument is still active and in the first paragraph says that the movie is all about villians, and that the only focus we have are the family anti-heroes. The first statement says that the movie the movie focuses on villians, conversely

543:

I had edited the old list of anti-heroes and thought it was relatively useful and interesting, but it still failed to meet the encyclopedic standards Knowledge (XXG) is aiming for. And I think that in its current state, this list suffers from the same problems. Finding sources and avoiding examples

498:

First of all, I disagree completely with your comment on video games. In case you haven't played any recent ones (say, from the past ten to twelve years), most video games tell a story, with often complex characters. Even if it is an interactive story of which your degree of success might depend on

5064:

I feel that I have to agree with this point. This list feels more like a Google search for any review with the word anti-hero in it. Would it be better to extend the anti-hero page with a few more clearly defined examples? A lot of the references are little more than reviews where someone has used

5014:(1) It provides no useful information to the reader. Who, exactly, is this list aimed at? It certainly isn't aimed at readers looking for a list of characters that meet wikipedia's own definition of anti-hero; nor is there any consistancy around any other definition. This renders the page useless. 4905:

is the opposite side on the anti-heroe dimension; while Shinji is a coward, Asuka is indeed brave, but in a selfish manner. I believe that to some extent all characters in Neon Genessis Evangelion are antiheroes, since at some point they all say that they do what they do for some selfish reason or

4666:

Your trilogy, THE CHRONICLES OF THOMAS COVENANT THE UNBELIEVER, will inevitably be compared / contrasted with J.R.R. Tolkien's LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy. I know you have great respect for Tolkien's work but isn't it difficult to explore the same grounds without losing your own originality? Is that

4530:

For the record, we also try to be strict with standards, but there are only a few of us monitoring the page. If you actually look at the history of the article you'll see many examples of us reverting examples based on the source being unreliable/invalid or not describing the cited character as an

3576:

The main issue I see with the list is that many have forgotten that “hero” is the major aspect of the definition of “anti-hero.” An anti-hero is, essentially, a hero who acts in a non-traditional manner towards heroic ends. I was going to comment on what qualities some of those on the list possess

3349:

Actually, I think that Benjamin Linus is still quite a mysterious character in the series Lost, which still has no ending, and it might be interesting to wait and see how it all unravels. Then, depending on what he finally does, it should be classified. But anyways, if there are cited sources that

3209:

I never said remove him. I looked at the argument and it was clear that debating such a classification is a lost cause. I'm saying that if a few quality match-ups can place a character on the anti-hero list, I believe Alastor meets at least one or two of those qualities. There's really no call for

3029:

I go back and forth on watching this page. I'll take it off my watchlist for stretches of time just so it doesn't feel like I'm camping the page and so I can come back with a fresh perspective. Plus, those of us who regularly check this page have generally been in such consistent agreement on what

2892:

isn't "sourced." Do you even know what a credible source is? I will agree one source I gave was not credible, but neither are movie reviews, which are purely biased and opinion-oriented. Just because a single person once somewhere incorrectly gave the label of anti-hero to a fictional character

2891:

Actually, two people on here seem to have enough time to decide what gets posted. Notice there is a lot of "you can post if..." This is Knowledge (XXG), anyone can post in spite of someone's presumption that the poster is incorrect. A lot of people have had their entries deleted just because it

2672:

Second, while I like your suggestion of a subsection for "consummate" anti-heroes I'm pretty certain it would simply become another battleground for POV. For example, I already disagree with your conditions for inclusion, namely the fifth, which does not apply to some of (what I consider) the more

2534:

Who are you to decide how credible a source is? Since when does using profanity mean its no longer credible? In fact, your critique that the articles aren't 'scholarly' enough or don't discuss the subject of being antihero is rather baseless: I suggest you take a look at some of the other sources.

2278:

How in the world is Leatherface from the Texas Chainsaw Massacre an anti-hero. To be an anti-hero the character still needs to be a hero, which he is specifically not. He viciously and cruelly kills random people mainly for the sadistic experience of their suffering with eating them as a distant

2021:

I removed Othello's Iago from the literary anti-heroes list. I'm not sure Iago is ever considered an anti-hero, he's one of Shakespeare's most memorable villains. The article on Iago makes it clear he is a villain, not an anti-hero. Of the two sources for this Iago anti-hero assertion, one link is

1777:

Your belief is not an encyclopedic source. We only add those for whom an appropriate source can be cited that specifically calls the character an anti-hero. Thanks for asking, though. We get so tired of people constantly making unsourced additions. Unsourced additions will get this article deleted

853:

They don't have to display any heroic qualities to be an anti-hero - otherwise they would just be "heros with some downfalls". It has more to do with their role in the context of the plot and less to do with whether they do any "good" deeds at all. The characteristics on the main page are example,

730:

And there's a large consensus that considers Hannibal to be an antihero. You just happen to disagree. You personally don't see him as an antihero, and frankly, I don't care. If we were to remove every single anti-hero thats contested there'd be nothing left. And for the record, I'm not the one who

597:

I'm not familiar with the books, so I'm just going to ask what qualifies Hannibal as an anti-hero. In the movies he doesn't usually do anything heroic and isn't actually the protagonist. Most heroic actions he takes throught the movies that I can think of were diversions so he could accomplish his

4706:

As for Covenant himself, I've never considered him to be "unsympathetic". I wouldn't have written him if he had not so fully engaged my sympathies. But, of course, while I was writing him in LORD FOUL'S BANE, I knew what he was going to become in THE POWER THAT PRESERVES. That -- combined with my

4610:

I feel that Garrett from the Thief Series should be added as an anti-hero. Although he is primarily motivated by greed (and is an amoral thief as the title suggests), he does occasionally do the right thing, and has saved the world no less than three times! I added Garrett the other day but my

4460:

I get what you're saying, but to me, it's still taking uncited Wikipedian opinions (even if a a large number of them reach a consensus in discussion) over published articles. This article was nominated for deletion before, and one of the things that kept it from being deleted was that its entries

3580:

Knowledge (XXG) has a definition of what an anti-hero is, as does Wiktionary. But both definitions are very limited and I would argue not accurate enough. An ant-hero is one who is a hero with a looser moral code. Usually they operate with an “ends justifies the means” attitude with a positive or

3016:

Knowledge (XXG) is an open-source encyclopedia, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have its rules. If someone's going to be doing something that's against article criteria, then its going to be removed. That doesn't mean that the removing editor is exacting his authority over others, it just simply

2424:

Also, keep in mind, this article states that "Some of the entries may be disputed by other sources, and some may contradict all established definitions of anti-hero". BUT..."Qualities normally belonging to villains (amorality, greed, violent tendencies, etc.) that may be tempered with more human,

1136:

Since IMDb has a lot of user-editting with categories, keywords, etc. (I believe, could be wrong though) like Knowledge (XXG) it's not considered reliable in this context. And I'm not sure about the second one either, since it's quoted from something called "Metaverse's Sleaze site", which as you

996:

when there was a list on the page and Batman was included under the vigilante section, so if you want to see a debate over Batman you might enjoy that. He's staying since we have a source, but if you find a source arguing against a classification of him as anti-hero we can add that it's disputed.

524:

and you'll see that the notion of asking for credible sources isn't silly, and if you think it is you can take your arguments there. You'll also see on the discussion of the old list's deletion that most people there didn't think it was too silly either. I'm not going to debate for or against the

402:

Ya the removal was a mistake if it was me I was having a problem getting my edit to go through might have removed yours when I finally got mine saved. Still the author never intended Lucifer to be a "good guy" or have good guy qualities. I will admit that I never read the book but I did study the

101:

I have to take some issue with the Doctor being on here. I think he is more of a tragic hero than an anti-hero, the source used talks about the Doctor in the context of the development phase, not the final product. Especially in the more recent incarnations, I think he fits better the tragic hero

4169:

Who moved Lelouch from Anime/Manga to comic books? Most articles on Knowledge (XXG) separate anime/manga from comic books. We should either start an anime/manga section or have him in both comic books for the Code Geass manga and him yet again in television for the Code Geass anime. And if it

3631:

Gollum’s motivation was to reacquire the One Ring at any cost for his own personal gratification. That is not heroic. Snape utilized questionable tactics and actions that were perceived as villainous until we learn that it was his “end” to see that Harry Potter survives to defeat Lord Voldemort.

2500:

Simply, using the word anti-hero is not enough; some justification should be present in a good citation. Even if I don’t agree personally, I would be more than happy to completely drop this if one credible article that explains how and why Leatherface is an anti-hero is cited. Beyond this, the

2372:

He does not commit "heroic acts" despite possessing traditionally unheroic qualities; rather he possesses A FEW sympathetic qualities in spite of his villainy. He still is a villain in that his action is "evil" in both purpose and effect; certainly, he cannot be considered a protagonist or even

2328:

One of the qualities listed is "Qualities normally belonging to villains (amorality, greed, violent tendencies, etc.) that may be tempered with more human, identifiable traits (confusion, self-hatred, etc.)". Leatherface has violent tendencies and villainous behaviors (i.e. cannibalism) that are

4841:

Sadly we have no way to trace a line separating the term villain and anti-heroe, and since the term itself is so ambiguous. Anyone famous or well enough known giving his opinion may be considered a source for wikipedia, even tough he might be wrong in throwing that particular character into the

4329:

I was just reading the discussion of Leatherface from last year. I kept seeing over and over that "one person's opinion doesn't matter", but only as far as getting someone removed. In other words, if I add to the list, and offer some citation, however tenuous that citation is, then it stays? No

770:

They are no worse than Patrick Bateman or Alex DeLarge. The former in question has no human qualities whatsoever. As long as there is a source citing them as antiheroes then they stay on the article. I'm really getting tired of people trying to remove characters from this category and violating

640:

This is not right. First he was created as a villain (voted one of the best two villains of the 20th century!). He does not deserve classification as an anti-hero anymore than Darth Vader deserves it for attacking the Emperor in the end. The fact Dr. Doom saved the whole world a number of times

4501:

go unchecked?), as well as 158. There's also at least half a dozen source links whose no longer exist (if they ever did). I didn't touch anything on the page, because I don't have the time or the knowledge of the subject matters necessary to exhaustively examine each and every one of these two

2438:

I am nothing if not reasonable. I would not care to answer your question, as I absolutely believe many of the other characters listed are NOT anti-heroes. I am not going to argue further on the definition and how it does or does not apply to Leatherface. The legitimacy of the citations is in

2125:

A source cannot be enough. What if a single source is contradicted by many others? Like I say in my answer for Hannibal, the list is in its present state heavily subject to personal opinion including the personal opinion that a single source is enough. Saying that there'd be nothing left if we

1834:

The root of the problem wit thispage is that there is NO CLEAR DIFINITION OF AN ANTIHERO! You could have Jack the Ripper as one, as he was a character with few if any traditional heroic qualities! This discusion page will not help much until we can find a way to deal with this matter. The only

1020:

is already defined. Although you may think it's far-fetched, verifiability is an important feature which Knowledge (XXG) actively seeks out, hence the importance of using reliable sources. You're absolutely right that anyone can refer to any character as an anti-hero, but that doesn't make the

2588:

An idea... This might be plain crazy or against wikipedia rules, so tell me if I am completely off-base here. Maybe make an archetypical antihero subsection within the list for characters who are "consummate" anti-heroes. They would have to fulfill all the terms that would end up listed for

1668:

stating 2+2=4 and referencing your Ti-83 calculator counts as original research. I say Wolf O'Donnell qualifies, as he picks a fight with Fox McCloud on the basis of a rivalry yet helped Fox save the universe from the Aparoid invasion, nearly killing himself and his whole team in the process.

5017:

Including people in a list on the grounds that at least one prominant person considers them an anti-hero is like including Obama in a list of communists, or Bush in a list of tyranical dictators, on the grounds that at least one person truly believes that they qualify (using there own unique

1749:

As long as he is NOT a traditional type of hero, he qualifies. More specifically he qualifies under the following definition mentioned in the Anti hero article, some come across, and one I added. "An Unconvetional hero" "A character with, few if any, traditional values or characteristics" "a

380:

Most refrences to Satan in Literature especially the earlier ones make him a villian and the progentor of evil even more sympathetic refrences don't usually deny that he is the imbodiment of evil. As for Patrick Baetmen I am not familiar with that character so I cannot make any comparison.

2549:(the anti-hero article tries to explain this). So perhaps you're right in that I shouldn't focus on Leatherface, but rather on getting this flawed list removed. I withdraw my individual complaint against Leatherface. The list needs a complete rewrite with more stringent restrictions.-- 2141:. And I'm not saying simply removing villains...I'm stating that if someone were to disagree with the classification of a character and then removed it there'd be nothing left. I don't think Homer Simpson is an antihero. But I'm not going to remove him and say "He's not an antihero!"-- 879:

it refers to them as anti-hereos, at least from the ways it is wrtitten, in that they are the opposite of the usually heroic main characters, so both because of the definition of the term and the way the article is written, that they are not intended to be interpreted as anti-heroes.

2558:

Alrighty then. Nominate the article for deletion, if you feel so strongly about it. I should point out, however, that this was nominated before and the consensus was to keep it, so keep that in mind. The discussion was in favor 10-2, with one of the two dissenters being the original

1808:

Taking on the role of anti-hero Jack Carver, you’re thrown right into a tropical paradise... TeamXbox(spring 2006) and the official amazon review: Hapless antihero Jack Carver..., now i need a bit of help. How do you add references to this kind of thing? I'm not sure :( Thanks again

2468:

Nighttimes.com - Does not make a case for Leatherface as an anti-hero at any point (the reference may even be sarcastic given the rest of the article). Seems highly uncredible, referring to the film as a “cinematic turd” shows it is not really a scholarly article about anti-heroic

2578:

First off, I'm sorry if I came off as rude before. There is an anti-villain page, but there is no list. There used to be one, but it was just people adding characters with no source. Anti-villain isn't as common as anti-hero so it would be harder to make a lengthy list using cited

1229:

Your first objection to inclusion of the images hinges on the argument that they are unnecessary, but necessity is completely POV: one could argue all images or even this entire encyclopedia is unnecessary. Your second objection that images are only to be included when the images

3577:

that qualifies them, but many are a complete mystery how they ended up listed. If the primary criterion for being included is that someone printed an article stating a specific character was an anti-hero, then it is completely subjective to that one individual’s point of view.

3012:

That doesn't mean I believe I have an authority over others. I don't remove legit entries, and I don't add unsourced ones. There are no rules on this page that I consider myself to be exempt from. You're the one who's trying to narrow down the list and exact your standards on

815:

Not entering the debate about whether or not they are anti-heroes, but your statement that they are being called anti-heroes because they are the focus of the media is flawed as the word protagonist indicates the focus of a story without attributing hero or anti-hero status.

403:

keypoints of it, a brife summary, and John Milton in English class. Anyway part of the wikipedia article on the poem does explain and argue against any supposedly noble attributes Lucifer may seem to have.Check under the 3rd paragraph under satan on the Paradise Lost article.

4299:

I just removed Freddy Krueger from this list because there is absolutely NOTHING anti-hero about him, he is a villian 100%. I'm currently wading through, trying to remove all the villians. Chucky from Child's Play? Who in their right mind thinks he's anything but a villian?

1012:

The people above discussing who is and isn't an anti-hero seem to disagree on what an anti-hero is. I suggest you figure out exactly what that is. I think it's far-fetched to justify that by what other sources have said so. Anyone can refer to any character as an anti-hero.

412:

Those are some theories by people who have read the book based on what what was written. Milton didn't come out and say what the story meant, it was for the reader to decide. You don't think he's an antihero, fine, but others do and a source has been cited so he's going to

3030:

we'll delete that it's pointless for us all to check the same article every day. I do think we need to come up some stricter standards on what we'll count as sources. It's a tough call. Printed sources, however, are clearly not the only sources allowed on Knowledge (XXG).

267:

Your definition of anti-hero is off. Anti-heroes are not villains or bad characters who lead to good ends. The real definition of an anti-hero is often one who walks away from a battle. Frodo Baggins in the Lord of the Rings is an example of a true literary anti-hero.

190:

Sometimes (it's quite rare) actual living people are referred to as anti-heroes in articles, newspapers, etc. It's pretty rare so you're question is completely valid (the old list was simply titled "list of anti-heroes"), but usually it's best to be as clear as possible.

4469:, as they both moderate this article. I'll admit I'm not an expert on all the rules at Knowledge (XXG), but they'll probably clarify what's the best route to take on this article. If they decide that the idea of having a consensus of opinion is valid I'll back off.-- 4928:, has, being evil and later switching to good. The link I posted about Shingi and Asuka also mentions Piccolo; "To a lesser extent, Piccolo could also be seen to possess some anti-hero qualities." It actually says this after dealing with the anti-heroism of Vegeta. 791:

The Rejects have little to none of the qualities mentioned at the top of the page. They're remorseless mass-murderers who kill for fun. They aren't redeemed, they don't have noble motives, ect. Plenty of villains care for their loved ones; that alone isn't enough.

3225:

of characters I don't like but are sourced. I wasn't attempting to be deliberately hostile to you specifically, I'm just in a pissy mood today for various reasons, so I apologize for that. As for Alastor, maybe you can search for some reviews that refer to him as

3070:

shrugs* I guess you could say that, although it would probably apply to 90% of any articles dealing with the critical response of a work of fiction. Buf if we don't have sources then we just get random people adding in their favorite characters with no rhyme or

2717:

has aspects that could qualify him as an anti-hero. For a start he claims not to be a hero as he only fights for himself. I don't have specific references for either of these two things outside of wikipedia or from what can be perceived from playing the games.

1356:

I can't see any reason why Elric shouldn't be on this list, he is called an anti-hero on his own page as well. While he should be placed here, the source for that statement is not cited, so if anybody can find an official reference for Elric, it would be very

339:

Fair enough. I've put good ol' Lucifer into the list, along with a website listing some Romantic-era criticism of Paradise Lost expounding on Satan's role as a hero from such literary luminaries like William Blake, Sam Coledrige, and Mary Shelley's husband!

3869:"The first one is great because it’s actually a scary movie. It’s really original. Bride is genius because it rewrites the whole series and Chucky becomes the anti-hero instead of the villain. There’s something great about how chose to rewrite the series." 1863:

Just as long as he is NOT considered a traditional type of hero, I think he may qualify. The root of that matter is that the definitions of Antihero are so broard, general and different, only traditional heroes types are excempted from being listed as some.

553:

I've just added a few sources/examples. Sources are particularly difficult for video games and television. I think that for video games sources can include articles in (online) magazines, but forums and blogs are unusable (which applies to all categories).

4373:

Well my "original research" turns up the definition of antihero on Knowledge (XXG): "In fiction, an antihero is a protagonist whose character and goals are antithetical to classical heroism." In general, and in the examples I cited, the villains are not

2233:"Each of these examples has been identified by a critic as an anti-hero, although the classification is somewhat subjective matter. Some of the entries may be disputed by other sources, and some may contradict all established definitions of anti-hero.") 4456:

Understood ... to certain extent. While I don't think that discussion that reaches a consensus is a fair comparison to 'voting' or undocumented additions, I will grant that the disclaimer does make the point that I (and others) were trying to address.

2032:

Its not for you to decide. As long as a source refers to him as such, and is properly cited, it stays. I've added am extra source. If we were to act like this and remove any character who we thought didn't fit the qualifications the article would be

3991:

You need a reliable external source (outside of Knowledge (XXG)) that refers to them as being antiheroes before adding them to the list. I'd be extremely surprised if no article ever called Light an antihero, although I have no idea who Lamperouge

1921:: "Rincewind, on the other hand is the ultimate anti-hero. Not the dark side of heroism as portrayed by Clint Eastwood etc., but what you get if you distil all the heroism out, leaving only a streetwise but inept example of thaumaturgical detritus." 2154:

Your arguments bring into question whether or not this article is encyclopedic in the first place. How is a critic's review of a movie not a personal opinion? Does being published in the Entertainment section of a local newspaper make it a fact?

3220:

I was being sarcastic because it seems that tons of people are complaining about Leatherface or attempting to remove him because they don't agree with his addition. It wasn't so much as targeted at you specifically but just in general. There are

2618:

I could have sworn I already replied...weird. Anyway, I would take it up with themidnighters, as he is the main editor on the article. I wouldn't have a problem with making subsections, though although I don't know how it'd fit in with the other

2373:

allied with the protagonists (as a typical antihero would be). Perhaps (but probably not), he could be considered an anti-villain, but certainly he does not fulfill the qualifications of an anti-hero. All in all, I think it should be edited. --

2309:

Second of all, Leatherface is hardly sadistic/cruel and doesn't enjoy people suffering. He is mentally retarded, childlike and is bullied/manipulated by his family. That's irrevelant to this discussion, of course, but I just wanted to make that

5025:

So why is the list here? The only reasons I can think of for a list to exist on wikipedia is to either demonstrate the definition by example, or to allow the reader to contrast and compare items that fit the definition. This list does neither.

528:

As for your question on where to find sources, references can include books, magazines and web sites to name a few. For example, many editions of books will have an introduction, and they may address the nature of the hero, as is the case with

3785:

Well, ask TheMidnighters first then. I think just being referenced as an antihero is enough, but he'll probably know better as to what constitutes a valid source. (Although there are other references in the article that are just as minute as

2114:

If we went by your guidelines then the list would be subject to personal opinion. So a source is enough, as long as said source is legit. If we were to go "B-but that character is a villain!" and remove cited examples then there'd be nothing

4054:

Unfortunately, none of those are acceptable. Be-stuff looks like a fan wiki and Amazon reviews aren't reliable sources. IGN would be a reliable source, but only if it called him an antihero. I'll do a google search and see if anything comes

1021:

assessment correct or suitable for inclusion in this list; using reliable sources is helpful since the classifications are made by (usually) people with knowledge on the subject, and/or reflect established public opinion. Hope that helps. --

169:

I agree. I have also added some video game characters, as they belong just as much as the others. There is no Category:Video Game Characters that I could find, so i added one to computer and video game protagonists, as it's mostly the same.

2464:

Fangoria.com - This is the only half-way justifiable article, but not a credible source. This seems to be more of a release marketing article trying to indicate TCM attempts elevate the depth of the film genre. Only uses the word anti-hero

2247:

That actually seems more like a disclaimer. I think it's fair to add a character if there is an established source saying that so-and-so is an anti-hero. It's either that, or as Leocomix pointed out, we let it be based on personal opinion.

2138:

Each of these examples has been identified by a critic as an anti-hero, although the classification is somewhat subjective matter. Some of the entries may be disputed by other sources, and some may contradict all established definitions of

857:

We don't have to justify the listed examples. External sources called them anti-heroes. The external sources can be wrong. Conversely, we don't have to alter the definition to make it fit every example that the external sources have named.

801:

I'm sorry to be harsh but your opinion, CyberGhostface's and mine have no bearing on whether or not they should be included since there are sources to back it up; leaving it to WP editors to decide and debate in this case would constitute

392:

PLease don't remove my discussion comments, unless that was just a mistake. Furthermore, his mention on the page specifically refers to his role in Paradise Lost, in which he is a sympathetic character. We're not referring to his roles in

2428:

Also, would you care to explain how Alex DeLarge and Patrick Bateman (the former's picture was used in this article before the fair use inquisitors removed it) act as heroic? Or how the natural born killers "act heroically, in scale and

662:

Too bad for you. You can't remove cited examples because you disagree with them. What if I disagreed with your classification of Namor as an antihero? Would that give me a right to remove it? That, and I'm not sure if you have even read

5036:

dispensed with, because at the moment the two pages glaringly contradict eachother. For example, the anti-hero page states "Antiheroes differ from Tragic heroes", yet Hamlet is currently listed as both an anti-hero and a tragic hero.

4836:

Leatherface, Chucky, and Freddy Krueger are not protagonists of any series. There's a reason they do not belong on the list; an anti-hero refers to a protagonist... whereas those characters are clearly the antagonists in their films.

102:

model than the anti-hero. The Doctor after all places life as beyond value, risks his life for companions, is brave, caring, etc. which are all characteristics of a classic hero, he does have major flaws, but he is not an anti-hero.

1738:

Sorry but this isn't a forum for editors to discuss their opinions of which characters are anti-heroes. If you want a character included in the list you just need to provide a reliable source describing a character as an anti-hero.

483:

This list still hasn't managed to incorporate a single source or external reference, leaving it completely POV and OR, against Knowledge (XXG) policies. These are the reasons similar lists have been deleted in the past, such as

1234:

are discussed rather than simply the subject of the image (if I understand your argument correctly) seems quite inaccurate, since if that were the case only articles concerning notable photographs, portraits, etc would contain

74:

Yea, he's Darth Vader and all, but if you think about in the end he kills the emperor and is still the chosen one plus he was the hero in the first 3 movies, he did bad things so i think he should be considered an anti-hero.

2685:). Your definition is more within the scope of the vigilante type of anti-hero (a questionable but ultimately heroic character), and while this might encapsulate the definition of anti-hero for you, it won't for everyone. -- 2060:

Also, it might be worth adding to the actual Iago article that he can be read as an anti-hero instead of a villain, since the entire article only discusses him as a villain with no mentions to his possible anti-hero status.

2172:

No, it doesn't and the article doesn't claim to be undisputed fact. This is stated as much in the opening paragraph. And reviews aren't 'fact' either, but a cited source is better than just some schmoe posting his favorite

1382:

Agreed. Considering Elric is often the young fantasy readers first brush with the concept of the antihero I am shocked that he isn't mentioned in the main article on antiheroes as well. Are these acceprtable as references:

4856:

If we are going to keep antagonists (as per the overall scope of the definition on the anti-hero page), then the opening paragraph on this page needs to be altered. Right now, it specifically details characteristics that

2935:

don't like, but there is little justification to exclude sources based on whether they are in print or online. And besides, with print media you still end up with what you would consider biased and opinion-based articles.

228:

Ah, I see what you mean. Another problem would of course be caused by characters in fictional biographies who are based on real characters. Two such rather good examples of anti-heroes I can think of spontaneously are

525:

merits of video games; the simple fact is there are critical reviews for most literature and a substantial amount on film and television, but unfortunately not a lot on video games, which hinders verifiability.

358:

You're wrong. The devil has been portrayed sympathetically many times in literature. I'd even go further to say Satan is more deserving of a spot than Patrick Bateman who has no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

1616:

Seriously... somtimes you people on Knowledge (XXG) takes this with "original reasearch" and sources too far. If it's in the games themselves, there's no reason a source other than the games would be needed.

3088:

Wait a minute. Let's back up to Shakesomeaction's claim to be an official mod on this page who gets to decide validity of the page's sources singlehandedly. What does that mean? That sounds like a hoax, and

2103:

It mixes totally different characters. The criteria seems to be 'if we have any source that says so that's enough' well, no, that's not enough, there must be a definition and consistency within the article.

3451:

The article is apparently about a adaption of the novel, it has been converted to a Graphic novel. Still valid though, as the section about Woland discusses him exclusive of the the novel or graphic novel.

2938:

The problem is, as I've stated so many times, that the application of the term (in most or perhaps all cases) is a subjective and debatable issue and as long as we state that fact in the article we remain

1321:

Maybe the entirety of the Predator race should not be included but, instead, specific Predators such as Broken Tusk from the original Aliens vs. Predator comic, or the Predators from the AvP film. - CawH

1259: 1876:

Jack isn't a ero, in any sense. He relies on his compass to tell him what he subconsciously wants, much as Harvey Dent relies on his coin. Besides, he's a selfish @#$ !%&? withput any obvious goal.

2970:

There's little to say that TM hasn't without coming off redundant, so I'll just state this in response to the complaint that I "police" this page and how I'm always asking for sources on the talk page.

2538:

So if you're going to argue that simply using the term antihero in describing Leatherface is not enough, then I suggest you take a look at numerous other entries on the list instead of singling out one

1089:

I wouldn't qualify any as particularly reliable. Knowledge (XXG) obviously doesn't cite itself as a source, and the others aren't too substantial/reliable. In future you'll want articles/reviews like

4898:

It's the second example. (I'm aware this source might be crap, but my google searchs in spanish and I have a hard time getting english pages, since antiheroe is written alike in english and spanish)

349:

An antihero has to have some redeeming qualities Lucifer being the imbodiment of pure evil has none therfore he is not an antihero. He also fails to meet the cirteria stated at the top of the page.

2319:

It's not a "personal opinion" that Leatherface is the villain of Texas Chainsaw Massacre. A sympathetic antagonist is not an anti-hero. In fact, that's pretty much the opposite of an anti-hero.

499:

your skill or perseverance, most video games have only one ending, or a few endings with very small variations. Should the characters of these stories not be counted because of the way games are

760:

Regardless of what a review says, how are they anti-heroes? They brutally rape and murder hundreds of innocent people for fun. Despite caring for their own, they display no heroic qualities. --

3647:

There's nothing really to say on this that hasn't been discussed already. Yes, the list (and what antihero means) is subjective. But removing entries based on our own personal views counts as

3350:

know he is an anti-hero (for instance, the actor himself in an interview, or the script-writers) then I guess it is understood that his actions up until now qualify as those of an anti-heroe.

4913:, altough since the series are still going, maybe he simply becomes a villain, or he becomes a good old fashioned heroe, so it might not be wise to put him up there yet. The same goes for 3933:

That is good enough for me and everyone else I suppose. I was just uncertain with the original source's statement. I just have trouble with the ambiguity the anti-hero definition. thanks

2873:

I am now an official mod on the fictional anti-heros page. Citations are only allowed from in-print sources and those I do not agree with will be arbitrarily deleted without discussion.

1835:

constant I have come across with definitions is that a person who is of a type recognized as a traditional hero type is not able to be counted as an antihero. That is the only constant.

2569:

of these characters would be more accurately defined as this)? If one does exist a merger might be a good idea and then sorting or something. I really don't know, what do you think?--

367:

Furthermore, don't remove Lucifer's section until a consensus was reached. But since sources are cited referring to him as an antihero, thats enough, so deleting him would be a case of

4679:

contrasted. Writing fiction, after all, is not a competition. In fact, nothing can destroy a writer faster than a tendency to compare / contrast himself with some towering predecessor.

3199:

Gasp. Someone disagrees with Leatherface's classification on this list? Oh no, that's horrible. I'm so upset. Just take a number and wait in line with the rest of the people. Thanks!--

1238:

This list includes images of some of the more notable and iconic fictonal anti-heroes of each given media, which are the subjects of this article. As such their inclusion falls under

3906:

series", but maybe one the regulars like Doczilla or Midnighters could clarify this for me. But if push comes to shove, and the current one is not acceptable, then we can just use

1711:

Is Vegeta from Dragon Ball Z an anti-hero too? He changes from a bad person to a good person and tries to save the world but still is selfish and arrogant. What do you guys think?

485: 4287:

Also, if you're interested, I suggest reviewing the Hannibal section above and other sections dealing with issues like inclusion and the wide variety of characters represented. --

2728:

You need a cited source to get a character mention in this list. Do a google search for "Prince of Persia" and "antihero" and see if any professional game reviews count as such.--

4257:

could someone edit this to take out all the villains that have been posted as antiheroes? for example, hannibal an antihero? please... do no confound antihero with the villain! (

4273:

If they're correctly cited an as antihero by a reliable source, then there is no reason for them to be removed, especially not because someone disagrees with their placement.--

2882:

Um, there's no such thing as being an "official mod" for an article, and noone gets to single-handedly decide what entries remain or not. I hope this is some kind of joke. --

2901:, yet you disclaim that some of these sources are personal opinion. Make up your mind what you see as fit and stick to it. Don't arbitrarily decide when it should be used.) 4192:

I'm still surprised that Yagami Raito hasn't been included in this list, since every list of anti-heroes place him as one of the best (or worse) anti-heroes of all times.

2927:

would open up POV battles about which articles are biased and which aren't. Your last point is pretty much a straw man argument since at no point do we say we "don't want

4707:

interest in people whose guilt arises from their essential innocence (just as their innocence grows out of their guilt) -- probably gives me an unusual tolerance for him.

1103:

You're right. The ones I gave sucked, but that was because I was too lazy. Just to see if I did any better at finding reliable info, I got two hopefully better ones:

939:

The source was a player review, although it superficially looked like an official review (my mistake). Player reviews, like customer reviews, are not valid sources. --

311:

anti-heroes, etc. But I do believe this character is a perfect embodiment of an "anti-hero" and I feel he should be at the head of the list. What do you guys think?

3918:

series that introduced audiences to a pop culture antihero and a horror icon." which does make a clearer indication of him being an antihero in all his appearences.--

4029:

Here's another link for Lelouch Lamperouge if the first one doesn't work. Although it doesn't explicitly say the word "anti-hero" it states his actions and morals.

3737:

I agree, remove Arthur Dent. Nothing about his character is anti-heroic. In the wikipedia for Arthur Dent there's a source for him being anti-heroic, and it is this

3677:

In the anti hero article it states numerous times that spiderman is an a primary example of the "young brooding anti-hero" yet he is notably absent from this list.

2472:

Dvdjournal.com – this short review makes no justification of its claim or even indicates the author understands the definition of anti-hero (as given on wikipedia).

1576:

ArwingLanding.Net is a reputable source - a big conundrum for Star Fox information. The following links state the Star Wolf team's profiles about their "position".

1202:

for this specific image. The images themselves are not discussed in the text and thus by definition they are decorative. If you want a second opinion on this, try

3132:

If you weren't making a well-placed joke, I am very embarrassed for the psychological community, of which I am a member. Ban me if you wish. It ain't no thang.

1795:

If you search for "Jack Carver" and "antihero" on Google and find a legit source that defines him as such (I.e. not a fan review on amazon) feel free to add it.--

1117:

The first one is a bit vague but does show that when Duke Nukem is searched for, Anti Hero is one of the keywords that comes up. And that is IMDB talking there.

2425:

identifiable traits (confusion, self-hatred, etc.)" is listed as criteria. And as I've pointed out, Leatherface's villainous acts are tampered with human traits.

2851:

CyberGhostface is merely stating the requirements for inclusion so that Shakesomeaction's additions do not get removed. Please refrain from personal attacks. --

4985:

What about Blade? I could have sworn that I heard in the Director's (David S. Goyer) commentary of Blade Trinity mentioned somewhere that he is an anti-hero.

2194:

Also, concerning your argument about critic's review; think of it this way. You can't go in an article about a movie and go "This movie is horrible." What you

4961:

is not an anti-hero, he's just a villain. The triangle between Near, Raito and Mello is a classical three-pole terror equilibrium, like the world division in

2298:

First off, your personal opinion (or anyone's for that matter) doesn't matter. Removing or adding characters to this list based on personal opinion counts as

2126:

removed villains is such bad faith and so false that you have already managed to thoroughly disabuse me there is any chance of having you relent your ways. --

1477: 2656:

Ideally, a source for the subsection would come out of an academic journal article (e.g. "The Anti-Hero In Eigteenth-Century Fiction". By: Adams, Percy G..

1194:

I know people like to have the images in the article; they make the article more attractive to read, but they're really not necessary. I don't need to see

623:

article here outlines the character's biography and the second source I just added to the list discusses his classification as an anti-hero extensively. --

5102: 3965:

Shouldn't Lelouch Lamperouge and Light Yagami added to the list since both of their articles on Knowledge (XXG) clearly state that they are anti-heroes.

3817:(Also, I think Swan could probably be on this list too. He's the cause of all the things mentioned above, all in the pursuit of greed and immortality.) 3654:

If someone's really confused, they just can click on the link for the proper context and make up their mind. But I don't see anyone becoming confused.--

1714: 1620: 1597: 1532: 1491: 1418: 422:

Lucifer is a villain, trying to overthrow God or get rid of paradise or something. He is therefore not a hero, not even an anti-hero. He is a villain.

1529:

How can I site if my sources are simply the manual and the game? Nintendo sites never cared about the characters outside the main team in the game. =/

1485: 1481: 1452: 735:

an antihero in the last two books. And he's far more of an antihero than Patrick Batman or Alex DeLarge, but I don't see you complaining about them.--

2622:

As for literary sources, do you mean judging if a character is one based on events in the book, or if a character is referred to such in the book?--

779:

caring for their own"? Their selfless love for each other was one of the major parts of the films and seperates them for two dimensional slashers.--

4862:

we clearly have), but there should be something in the opening paragraph making it clear that the list is NOT comprised solely of protagonists. --

1165:. I'll give more links for reference if needed, shouldn't be difficult if Google comes up with 27,500 pages with the search string "Avon+antihero". 3554:

For example, if you were to find a review that said something like "Antihero Star Wolf is the most interesting character" then we could add him.--

3298:

a villain and does nothing to help the survivors (minus trying to prevent the freighters from arriving, but he's saving his own hide over theirs).

1726: 3510:

There's still one vid I am looking for where Star Wolf comes and assists Star Fox in the Aparoid Homeworld invasion. but yeah, those are proof.

3475:

I looked at the discussion and it seems that no one posted links on proof that Star Wolf, or at least Wolf, is an antihero. Here are some links.

1242:#8, specifically the identification of the subject of an article or illustrating relevant points (in this case the "points" are the examples). -- 4576:, as portrayed in the films (or at least the most recent installations), be included in this list, or would they be more listed as villians? -- 1255:

Yes, you are correct in your interpretation of my comments, and this is entirely in line with the Foundation's stance on non-free images (see

5042:

So as it stands, this page is misleading, incoherent and contradictory, and as such I don't see how it can have a place in an encyclopedia.

4734: 3678: 3277: 2822: 82: 5112:

Serkis was talking about the LOTR film, not the novel. I would think at least a clarification on the author or medium would be in order...

5049: 3824: 3158: 2788: 4810:

Why isn't Deadpool included here? Considering his character and history, he is known as an anti-hero. Shouldn't he be added to the list?

2080:

Heh, no problem. Anyway, looks good now, and the citations are much more robust if a reader should happen to look into them in the future.

980:

got this code and he's all noble, and he even risks his life to save villains from being murdered, something an anti-hero would never do.

1551:

Just search "Star Wolf" and "antihero" on google and if you find a reputable source (I.e. not a geocities website) then you can add it.--

4992: 4219: 4177: 4039: 4020: 3314: 3242: 2286: 1884: 1624: 1601: 1395: 1373: 1329: 429: 4635:

If your addition was removed, it was because you didn't have a source calling him such. Since you have one now, you can add him back.--

5101:

First, the source cited gives a 404 error, so the article seems to have been deleted, though I did find it using the Internet Archive

5081: 4817: 4775: 4425: 4389: 4337: 4139: 4102: 3525: 1679:

Hey, if I can find someone calling Leatherface an antihero, surely you can find someone calling Wolf o'Donnell one, huh? *wink wink*--

1536: 1495: 1422: 230: 3651:. Yes, the links make it subjective to that reviewer's point of view, but its still a cited review and not just the editor's opinion. 3843:

But including a character on the list because you feel that he fits the criteria based on his actions counts as original research.--

3727: 3456: 3442: 47: 17: 4154:

Well, you (or anyone else) can add it if you want now that it has a source. But if no one does it soon, I'll try to add it later.--

1510:

You need a secondary source describing them as antiheroes for them to be included in the list, otherwise it's original research. --

2203:

is an antihero is beside the point, because as long as they have cited sources referring to them as such, then they get to stay.--

2706: 1181: 4667:

why Covenant is such an unsympathetic character -- even an anti-hero? Are his leprosy and bitterness an antidote for Hobittitis?

2931:" (all sources concerning the labelling of anti-heroes is opinionated). And finally, obviously your comment will not be deleted. 1983:

Redemption heroes have become recognized as traditional, and are thus exempt from from being antiheroes solely on those grounds.

4351:

If you find a reliable source, then you can add it. If it has a reliable source, it stays. That's all there is to it. Removing

4212:

Artemis Fowl, from Eoin Colfer's series? Noble intentions eventually, but uses mostly illegal means. Someone add him, please?

3980: 3950: 3887: 2405:. This goes for ANYONE. If a character is cited by a legit source, it stays. If not it, its removed. End of subject. There are 1455:

contain references itself, though they don't provide the link (the references are the manuals and, as I said before, the game).

3641: 5130: 2999:

And Knowledge (XXG), by nature, is not a valid site. It is edited by any hoo-ha who can type and has access to the internet.

5032:

Any decision filter used to determine inclusion that results in factually incorrect has no place at all in an encyclopedia.

1639:

It's Knowledge (XXG) policy. This isn't the place to debate the policy. Take it up at the talk page for the policy article.

1311:"showing them as a kind of noble, anti-hero, alien culture" does not specifically call them anti-heroes. "kind of" is weak. 272:

Sorry but if there is a "real definition" of an anti-hero it isn't "walking away from a battle". I suggest reading a bit of

4572:

I'm trying to keep within the rules here (so you know what to do should I break them), but would the students and staff of

1849:

In the Pirates of the Carribean trilogy, Will Turner plays the archetypical hero, and Jack fulfills the role as anti-hero.

3738: 3529: 2781:

If you don't mind doing so I believe that Cryptosporidium-137/8 should be added to the list of anti-heros in video games

895: 5065:

the term anti-hero in passing. Is referencing a subjective reviewer's write up better than our own subjective opinions?

3692:

Probably because no one bothered to find a reliable source calling him such. If you can find one, go ahead and add him.--

1476:, they lack characterization, but as I stated, this was resolved in later series, where the core Star Wolf is made up of 537: 4906:

other, but I think incluiding all of them would be pointless; Shinji and Asuka should be enoug to represent Evangelion.

3452: 3438: 3536:

The link needs to call him an antihero specifically. Including a character because you believe he fits the criteria is

1203: 2475:

Aintitcool.com – See . Also, the author’s use of quite a bit of profanity takes away from it as a credible article.

931:

I remaber seeing Dante on the Anti hero list . So why was it remove from the list ? There was sorce from a review .--

3382:. I don't have a source yet, but from reading the novel, it's clear that he isn't a villain. More evidence to come. 1093:, or including where 3D Realms calls him an anti-hero. I included it in the list with the review already linked. -- 330:

page shows how the editors have kept religious objections/manipulations off the article civilly and efficiently. --

38: 5106: 4943:, but since I don't know them much, I feel someone else should decide and if so, get the most apropriate source. 517: 4750: 4730: 2818: 2696: 1722: 1387: 1303:

Why where the Predators remove on the List. It even have a link to prove that the Alien race are Anti Heros . .--

899: 764: 321:

Honestly the most important thing is that it's sourced, as long as there's a reliable source saying Lucifer from

235: 3009:

main people" was referring to??? If not, then why is it a problem that I 'assume' that you are talking about me?

1267: 4795: 4640: 4595: 4521: 4474: 4445: 4408: 4364: 4320: 4278: 4159: 4122: 4079: 4060: 3997: 3923: 3848: 3828: 3791: 3776: 3761: 3746: 3697: 3682: 3659: 3559: 3545: 3420: 3406: 3379: 3281: 3261: 916: 448: 86: 5053: 4403:

And yet all these characters who aren't antiheroes managed to have reliable sources calling them antiheroes.--

3162: 2792: 1767:

Could I add Jack Carver, from the Farcry games to this list as I believe he is a good case of an anti-hero...

4996: 4181: 4043: 4024: 3310: 3246: 2290: 2051:

discuss him as an anti-hero, so I guess he belongs after all. Well, at least it's much better referenced now!

1853:

If you can find a source labeling him as such (and I'd be very, very suprised if there isn't) then add him.--

1399: 1369: 1333: 4821: 4779: 4429: 4393: 4341: 4305: 4223: 4143: 4106: 2807:

I know that these are less common than male anti-heros, but I feel that there need to be some on the list.

2761: 1946: 1888: 1718: 1628: 1605: 1540: 1499: 1426: 433: 200:

Not to be a grumpy old skeptic, but I am not entirely convinced of this. Could you maybe provide an example?

5118: 5069: 5045: 4988: 4813: 4771: 4722: 4421: 4385: 4333: 4215: 4173: 4135: 4098: 4035: 4016: 3968: 3938: 3875: 3820: 3715: 3513: 3302: 3273: 3154: 2810: 2784: 2282: 1942:

novels, is anti-authoritarian and cynical, equally dislikes all species, but has a strong sense of justice.

1880: 1391: 1361: 1325: 1169: 883: 675:, both which have Hannibal in the protagonist's role and is displayed more of an antihero than a villain.-- 425: 78: 5077: 4948: 4847: 4262: 3521: 3355: 3211: 3190: 1669: 1037: 4584: 3772: 3742: 3434: 2842:

Oh, my! You're so gracious for giving Shakesomeaction permission to edit this open source encyclopedia.

2081: 2062: 2052: 2023: 183:

Why do we need the addition of "fictional" or "in fiction" at all? Where else would anti-heroes appear?--

159:

This page has kind of an awkward title; I think it should be changed to 'list of fictional anti-heroes'.

4921: 4625: 4301: 4008: 3723: 3306: 2843: 2320: 2239: 2156: 1958: 1365: 932: 569: 126: 5134: 5085: 5073: 5057: 5000: 4974: 4952: 4871: 4851: 4825: 4799: 4783: 4754: 4738: 4644: 4629: 4599: 4535: 4525: 4511: 4488: 4478: 4449: 4433: 4412: 4397: 4368: 4345: 4324: 4309: 4291: 4282: 4266: 4258: 4238: 4227: 4201: 4185: 4163: 4147: 4126: 4110: 4083: 4064: 4047: 4001: 3984: 3954: 3927: 3891: 3852: 3832: 3795: 3780: 3765: 3750: 3731: 3701: 3686: 3663: 3563: 3549: 3517: 3460: 3446: 3424: 3410: 3391: 3359: 3344: 3285: 3265: 3250: 3230: 3214: 3203: 3193: 3177: 3166: 3136: 3116: 3107: 3097: 3075: 3062: 3034: 3021: 3003: 2994: 2984: 2965: 2955: 2909: 2886: 2877: 2868: 2855: 2846: 2837: 2826: 2796: 2770: 2752: 2732: 2722: 2689: 2626: 2583: 2573: 2563: 2553: 2543: 2505: 2433: 2409:

of entries I disagree with but I'm not complaining because them's the rules. Removing entries based on

2377: 2333: 2323: 2314: 2257: 2242: 2207: 2177: 2159: 2145: 2130: 2119: 2108: 2084: 2075: 2065: 2055: 2037: 2026: 2005: 1987: 1962: 1892: 1871: 1857: 1839: 1823: 1813: 1799: 1790: 1771: 1754: 1743: 1730: 1698: 1683: 1672: 1643: 1632: 1609: 1555: 1544: 1514: 1503: 1442: 1430: 1403: 1345: 1315: 1287: 1246: 1223: 1141: 1130: 1097: 1083: 1048: 1025: 1001: 984: 981: 968: 958: 943: 920: 862: 848: 825: 810: 796: 783: 739: 705: 679: 645: 627: 614: 587: 572: 558: 548: 536:

If you want a guideline for "which" "sources" "people" "would" "find" "credible", "you" "can" "check" "

507: 504: 492: 452: 437: 417: 407: 397: 385: 375: 362: 353: 344: 334: 315: 293: 280: 223: 195: 174: 163: 149: 129: 111: 90: 4573: 3898:

He's still the same character in all the films, though. I really don't agree with saying "Chucky from

3719: 3173:

Just find a review or some source making reference to him as such and add him to the proper section.--

1304: 1199: 208: 4944: 4843: 4746: 4726: 3637: 3351: 3133: 3000: 2991: 2962: 2906: 2874: 2814: 1464:

The thing is, they won't show their anti-heroic attitude until the third game in the series which is

1448: 1177: 955: 160: 4516:

If you find any unreliable/questionable sources, post them here. I removed the ones you mentioned.--

3942: 3879: 3397:

It can't be included unless you have an reliable external source calling him such. Anything else is

2740: 2661: 2612: 2570: 2550: 2502: 2374: 4791: 4636: 4621: 4591: 4532: 4517: 4485: 4470: 4462: 4441: 4404: 4360: 4316: 4288: 4274: 4235: 4155: 4118: 4075: 4056: 3993: 3976: 3946: 3919: 3883: 3844: 3787: 3757: 3693: 3655: 3555: 3541: 3416: 3402: 3257: 3227: 3200: 3174: 3104: 3072: 3018: 2981: 2952: 2883: 2865: 2852: 2834: 2767: 2729: 2686: 2623: 2580: 2560: 2540: 2430: 2330: 2311: 2204: 2174: 2142: 2116: 2072: 2034: 2002: 1954: 1854: 1820: 1796: 1740: 1695: 1680: 1552: 1511: 1439: 1342: 1243: 1138: 1094: 1045: 1022: 998: 965: 940: 912: 807: 780: 736: 676: 624: 611: 584: 555: 545: 489: 444: 414: 394: 372: 359: 331: 277: 220: 192: 107: 4932: 4716: 2329:

tampered with 'more human, identifiable traits' such as loneliness, confusion, etc and so forth.--

1694:

to this article, for example, but since I have yet to find a review calling him such I have not.--

1056: 887: 341: 312: 5126: 4958: 4940: 4867: 4581: 4503: 3387: 3340: 3093:

so, this person should be blocked from editing this page for attempting to perpetrate said hoax.

2253: 1589:

In addition, the official manga for Star Fox 64 explicitly shows how Wolf feels towards Star Fox.

1281: 1217: 821: 3811:

as his musical work and hippy girlfriend are stolen, so he goes nuts and starts killing people.

1973:

I removed this example of what an antihero may exhibit as a characteristic of being an antihero

1918: 1256: 909: 4970: 4197: 3741:

which is some odd social commentary and nothing to do with Hitch Hikers guide at all. REMOVE!

3478: 3151:

Can someone PLEASE tell me how I do this, I wanna add Master Shake, he's a worthy anti-hero.

3059: 2595:(2) they lack several traditional heroic archetypical traits (ex: courage, ideals, fortitude), 2238:

That's a pretty good indicator that this whole article is indeed flawed and not encyclopedic.

1579: 891: 201: 184: 3324: 2673:

iconic, clearcut and universally recognized anti-heroes of modern literature (like Alex from

2418: 2299: 1819:

Just add the name and the source. (Sorry if you already did this, but no one responded yet)--

1783: 368: 4965:- Near is the heroic type, Raito is the protagonist and anti-hero and Mello is the villain. 4507: 3872:

The current wording seems to imply that Chucky is anti-hero in all theatrical appearances.

3375: 2714: 1997:

He's playing both sides - he could be siding with the enemy, with an ally, or even his own.

1984: 1868: 1836: 1751: 1690:

on his qualities in the story itself is not a reliable source in this case. I'd like to add

1469: 1465: 1111: 665: 4092: 4030: 3328: 3128:

it is a open-source encyclopedia of which no one should consider themselves the main editor

1779: 1447:

My reference would be the game itself, but I don't know how to cite it. The articles about

1239: 803: 568:

The artical said that an Anti-Hero had to have eventual redeption via love, sacrifece, ect.

521: 4914: 3633: 2749: 2719: 1592: 1584: 1173: 671: 620: 610:

he is the protagonist, his tragic past is explored and he does one or two heroic things.--

4356: 3648: 3537: 3398: 2919: 2764: 2414: 2303: 2759: 1060: 5105:

if anyone wants to fix the article link (which technically should be done according to

3972: 1810: 1768: 1127: 1080: 993: 404: 382: 350: 327: 103: 4895: 3332: 2915: 2228:

The opening paragraph basically says that this is NOT a list of ficitonal anti-heroes:

1064: 5122: 4910: 4902: 4863: 4577: 4466: 3430: 3383: 3336: 3113: 3094: 3031: 2249: 2127: 2105: 1787: 1640: 1415:

seeking for redemption, and the default path shows that they did receive redemption.

1312: 1273: 1209: 1195: 859: 817: 702: 642: 290: 142: 1068: 216: 4966: 4889: 4193: 3484: 3481: 1935: 1384: 1044:

All you have to do is find a reliable source that describes him as an anti-hero. --

4917:, who normally fits more the heroe type, but it might ultimately end up changing. 4132:

Shouldn't Lelouch be added now? CyberGhostface's link explicitly says antihero.

4070: 3907: 3103:

I have a feeling that he/she was trying to be sarcastic more than anything else.--

2914:

I'll try to form a response point by point. "You can post if..." is in regards to

2338:

I cannot identify Leatherface as an anti-hero. The article for anti-hero states:

137: 4962: 4615: 4590:

All you need is a reliable source that calls them an antihero (like a review).--

2758:

Here are some published reviews for Prince of Persia that use the term antihero.

2710: 2700: 1473: 1107: 908:

and evoking an unexpected creepiness out of the sun-bleached California desert".

844:

That should be clarified in the beginning when it talks about characteristics.--

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2903:

Delete this if you wish. You'll have read it anyway, and that is my intention.

1341:

If you can find a source referring to them as such, then go ahead and add it.--

1090: 4936: 4765: 3863:

I believe that the information about Chucky as an anti-hero should be edited.

3487: 3058:

This page is basically based on a biased view. It's just everyone's "opinion"

1153: 845: 793: 761: 513: 250: 171: 3756:

You can't remove sourced entries because you disagree with their placement.--

3572:

Definition of Anti-Hero and opinion of Knowledge (XXG)'s stance on neutrality

1867:

Anyway, why is he mentioned in the part under Jack Sparrow, and jack is not?

1939: 1913: 1909: 1691: 1017: 516:

who added the section. Please read the official Knowledge (XXG) policies on

273: 212: 4618:

to a(n archived) BBC webpage which clearly cites Garrett as an (anti)hero.

3866:

The following is an excerpt from the source citing Chucky as an anti-hero:

2709:

says that "(The Prince) has become a generic tough guy or anti-hero." Also

2601:(4) have their own values which may or may not be in unison with societies, 3505: 3502: 3499: 3496: 3493: 954:

Somebody needs to add V from V for Vendetta. He is an archetypal antihero.

4656:

hero." There are some good interviews with the author at his website at

1947:

http://www.lspace.org/books/analysis/andreas-kristiansen.html#Toc58643935

1158: 4011: 3902:" (if that's what you're trying to suggest) instead of "Chucky from the 3270:

I agree with anonymous. Randall Flagg is a villain, not an anti-hero.

2401:

First off, whether or not you consider Leatherface to be an antihero is

1977: 544:

where verifiability is difficult/impossible would fix these problems. --

1923: 1162: 788:

Then remove Bateman and DeLarge as well. Two wrongs don't make a right.

245: 3435:

http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2008/05/klimowski-schejbal-margarita

1198:

here when I can go straight to the character's own article page or to

4925: 4249:

He kills people, but they're usually criminals or dirty cops anyway.

3368: 2943:

about the subjectivity of the list. We are not saying that these are

2604:(5) and, in the end, act heroically, in both heroic scale and daring. 1912:

accidentally saves the world and does other heroic deeds in multiple

240: 4657: 4009:

http://www.amazon.com/review/product/B001AZ5ITM?filterBy=addFourStar

4170:

matters, the Code Geass anime and manga follow different stories.

4355:

adding characters because of your personal opinion constitutes as

3241:

Randall Flagg, by all definitions, is a bad guy, not a anti-hero.

1949:: "Commander Sam Vimes is the most easily recognizable anti-hero" 4745:

Updated the reference to point to the author's official website.

2741:

http://uk.pc.gamespy.com/pc/prince-of-persia-2-2005/570797p2.html

1953:

I don't see any problems with these references, so I added them.

1438:

If you can find a source that refers to them as such, go ahead.--

1260:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Kat Walsh's statement

533:

for example, where Alex' qualities as an anti-hero are discussed.

772: 4717:

http://www.stephenrdonaldson.com/fromtheauthor/page.php?Page=11

2598:(3) use methods and have intentions both ideal and underhanded, 1648:

I've provided links. How come Wolf O'Donnell is not yet listed?

1074:

Also, 3D Realms website itself calls him an anti-hero as well.

1057:

http://www.gamingworldx.com/news/DukeNukemArrivesonZodiac.shtml

4095:

It doesn't use the word anti-hero but it does say he is mad.

1121:

easily quoted it and then omitted the term if it wasn't true.

25: 1919:

http://booksiloved.com/20/Color_of_Magic-Light_Fantastic.html

606:. That's all I say. The movie is much different. In the book 3112:

Let's find out. After all, a feeling is not a valid source.

2947:

anti-heroes, merely that they are characters that have been

4790:

You just need a reliable source referring to him as such.--

3479:

http://www.arwinglanding.net/sfds/index.php?page=characters

1580:

http://www.arwinglanding.net/sfds/index.php?page=characters

3712:

Really. . . Does someone have a verfied source for that?

2607:

These are just examples (taken from the antihero article

1206:

and I guarantee you other admins will tell you the same.

1112:

http://www.3drealms.com/news/1998/02/duke_nukem_movi.html

486:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of anti-heroes

4888:

The first and most obvious anti-heroe I can think of is

4093:

http://stars.ign.com/objects/102/10207290_biography.html

4031:

http://stars.ign.com/objects/142/14236948_biography.html

3189:

labeled as such, Alastor could easily meet those terms.

2608: 2918:

which states that claims need sourcing, otherwise it's

2833:

As long as you have a cited source, you can add them.--

1593:

http://arwinglanding.net/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=2

1585:

http://www.arwinglanding.net/sf2/index.php?page=enemies

3840:

just did a google seach for Leach and nothing came up.

1065:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Fictional_anti-heroes

2660:, Spring76, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p29, 23p; AN: 6889189).-- 2592:

1) they must be the protagonist (not the antagonist),

1468:. They will continue to do so up to the recent game, 1069:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Duke_Nukem:_Manhattan_Project

1061:

http://www.mediafamily.org/kidscore/chart.asp?ID=3243

598:

own objectives (such as escape from police custody).

4660:that discuss the character's unsympathetic nature. 4461:

were sourced. If you want, you can bring this up to

2980:

recent changes and see if there's a source or not.--

2975:

gets removed. I don't "control" the page. There are

4896:

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AntiHero

4315:

Good luck with that. Your edits will be reverted.--

3415:I did a quick google search and nothing came up.-- 731:added Hannibal to the list. Furthermore, Hannibal 3814:How do I find a reliable source to confirm this? 2398:I have no idea why this is still being discussed. 4909:An other popular (possible) anti-heroe would be 3492:Here are even vids to provide stuff about them! 3485:http://super-smash-bros.wikia.com/Wolf_O'Donnell 3482:http://guides.ign.com/guides/748545/page_68.html 4611:edit was promptly removed with no explanation. 3471:Some links explaining Wolf O'Donnell's position 1270:but has until recently only be laxly enforced. 5011:I think this article is flawed on two levels: 289:Right. Frodo is the classic "reluctant hero". 1993:I am surprised no one mentioned Severus Snape 8: 5018:definitions of the terms) and has said so. 2010:Can I post book pages on the last two books? 1108:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0280617/keywords 3488:http://super-smash-bros.wikia.com/Star_Wolf 443:His entry is sourced. That's all we need.-- 4931:Others listed on the Spanish article are: 4614:As justification, I offer the following 4208:HOW COULD YOU GUYS FORGET ARTEMIS FOWL ? 4117:It has to call him an antihero, sorry.-- 3914:is the fifth installment in the popular 964:He's already there under comic books. -- 134:I agree and have added him to the list. 3806:So.. how do you find a reliable source? 3017:means that he's following said rules.-- 2737:Thats what I thought: I found this one: 1926:: "Rincewind is Pratchett's anti-hero" 4493:The problem here is that this article 3506:http://youtube.com/watch?v=rOQXs-B8bfs 3503:http://youtube.com/watch?v=AM6QWn0iNPQ 3500:http://youtube.com/watch?v=-VA2s4bY1-U 3497:http://youtube.com/watch?v=ysW-z47Bm6Y 3494:http://youtube.com/watch?v=J91fAOBsaW0 1980:through love, friendship, duty, etc." 1830:The root of the problem with this page 1482:Panther Caluroso (Caruso/Caroso in US) 1262:for discussion). In reality, this has 1036:If you don't mind me asking, wouldn't 125:i believe that he should be included. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4012:http://bestuff.com/stuff/light-yagami 2766:You should be able to add them now.-- 7: 4924:, as his role is similar to the one 3571: 1924:http://www.sfsite.com/05a/last56.htm 992:has already been argued to death at 123:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 3961:Lelouch Lamperouge and Light Yagami 3256:He's sourced. That's all we need.-- 2658:Studies in the Literary Imagination 2439:question for the following reasons: 207:Usually it's also incorrect usage: 3429:I found a realible source for it, 1008:Concerning the disagreements above 231:John Wilmot, 2nd Earl of Rochester 24: 4658:http://www.stephenrdonaldson.com/ 3323:That's not for us to decide. See 3210:such blatantly scathing sarcasm. 2042:Heh, I didn't remove him because 1934:The (former) alcoholic policeman 641:doesn't make him an anti-hero. -- 18:Talk:List of fictional antiheroes 3470: 2763:And here is one for Solid Snake. 2609:http://en.wikipedia.org/Antihero 1969:Changed the top of the list page 538:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources 136: 29: 3122:a feeling is not a valid source 2664:12:47, 23 September 2007 (CST) 2615:00:47, 18 September 2007 (CST) 1204:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use review 2838:03:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2827:02:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2797:23:08, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 2690:23:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 2627:01:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 2584:03:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2574:21:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2564:21:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2554:21:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2544:23:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 2506:22:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 2434:21:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 2378:21:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 2293:) 01:28, August 28, 2007 (UTC) 1336:) 01:31, August 28, 2007 (UTC) 1299:Why was the PREDATORS remove ? 969:08:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 959:03:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 944:19:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 5135:01:40, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 5058:01:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 4872:17:57, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 4764:What about Bill Compton from 4645:16:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 4630:10:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 4606:Garrett from the Thief Series 4600:15:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 4585:15:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 4536:11:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 4526:03:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 4512:02:21, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 4489:21:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 4479:02:37, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 4450:02:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 4434:01:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 4413:00:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 4398:23:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 4369:22:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 4346:20:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 3345:09:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 2951:as anti-heroes by a critic.-- 2771:13:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 2753:13:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 2733:21:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 2723:14:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 2334:04:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 2324:03:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 2315:21:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 2208:21:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 2178:04:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 2160:03:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 1824:04:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC) 1288:00:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 1247:22:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1224:21:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1142:17:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 1131:02:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 1098:23:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 1084:22:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 1049:15:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 512:I'm guessing you're actually 4975:23:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 4920:One who should be listed is 4826:19:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 4800:21:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 4784:18:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 4325:12:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 4310:09:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 4202:23:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 3796:00:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 3781:23:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 3766:12:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 3751:03:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 3461:22:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 3447:22:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 3266:01:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 3251:01:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 3231:03:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 3215:02:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 3204:01:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 3194:01:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 3178:01:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 3167:03:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 3076:17:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 3063:04:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 2099:This whole article is flawed 1699:03:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 1684:01:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 1673:01:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 1026:04:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 1002:14:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 985:11:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 294:22:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 281:18:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 5086:11:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC) 4901:Here it also comments that 4755:03:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 4739:03:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 4292:16:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4283:13:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4267:12:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4234:Um, he's already listed. -- 3137:04:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 3117:16:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 3108:16:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 3098:16:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 3035:16:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 3022:15:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 3004:14:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2995:14:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2985:11:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2966:14:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2956:11:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2910:09:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2887:04:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2878:01:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2869:11:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2856:01:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2847:00:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 2243:01:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 1963:01:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC) 1346:03:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 854:not the criterion. - Xvall 849:01:41, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 811:00:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 797:00:27, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 784:00:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 765:00:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 628:02:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 615:02:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 418:11:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 408:06:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 398:02:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 386:02:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 376:02:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 363:02:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 354:01:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 345:02:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 335:17:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 316:14:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 217:Colin Powell, the anti-hero 5152: 4027:) 18:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 3564:14:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 3550:14:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 3530:14:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 3425:22:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 3411:22:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 3392:21:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 2258:21:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1938:, protagonist in multiple 1404:20:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC) 900:20:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 826:20:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 573:04:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 253:18:20, 1 August 2006 (CET) 204:04:08, 17 July 2006 (CET) 187:13:36, 15 July 2006 (CET) 121:Considering the events in 91:02:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC) 4953:15:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 4852:14:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 4239:14:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 4228:04:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 4186:01:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 4164:03:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC) 4148:02:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC) 4127:17:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 4111:16:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC) 3853:19:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 3833:19:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 3607:SPOLIER WARNING ********* 3360:13:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 3286:09:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC) 2146:16:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2131:11:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2120:17:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2109:14:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2085:08:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 2076:01:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 2066:01:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 2056:00:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 2038:14:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 2027:02:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 1988:02:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 1893:04:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC) 1872:02:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 1814:19:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 1755:02:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC) 1316:23:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 740:16:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 706:11:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 680:17:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 646:14:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 588:19:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 453:20:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC) 438:20:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC) 224:08:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 196:16:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 164:15:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 150:17:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 130:21:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 5098:A couple of things here: 5001:11:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC) 4568:Students of St Trinian's 4084:19:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 4065:19:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 4048:18:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 4002:16:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 3985:02:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 3955:06:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 3928:02:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 3892:01:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 3732:15:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC) 3702:23:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 3687:22:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 3380:The Master and Margarita 2681:or Humbert Humbert from 2006:22:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 1858:15:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1840:02:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 1800:17:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 1791:17:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 1772:17:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 1744:14:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 1731:13:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 1644:14:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 1633:12:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 927:Dante from Devil May Cry 863:20:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 559:17:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 549:16:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 508:01:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 493:12:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 175:12:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 112:01:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 3664:11:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 3642:08:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 3453:The Illusional Ministry 3439:The Illusional Ministry 2677:, Patrick Bateman from 2136:From the main article: 2001:Do you have a source?-- 1610:09:24, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 1556:15:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 1545:08:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 1515:17:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 1504:14:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 1443:20:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 1431:14:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 1307:00:55, 9/14/2006 (UTC) 1258:for a recent email and 935:00:55, 9/14/2006 (UTC) 921:15:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 755: 209:John Kerry as anti-hero 4253:too many villains here 4007:Are these links okay? 2235: 4981:Blade (Marvel Comics) 3437:. I'm adding it now. 3147:How do I add someone? 2231: 1845:Captain Jack Sparrow? 1717:comment was added by 1623:comment was added by 1600:comment was added by 1535:comment was added by 1494:comment was added by 1421:comment was added by 42:of past discussions. 4832:Too many antagonists 4245:Two Face/Harvey Dent 4074:for Light, though.-- 3335:for relevant policy 2697:The Prince of Persia 1908:The cowardly wizard 4574:St Trinian's School 4463:User:TheMidnighters 2929:opinionated sources 2899:opinionated sources 2413:opinions counts as 2274:Really? Leatherface 756:The Devil's Rejects 213:Eminem as anti-hero 4959:Mello (Death Note) 2864:pretty gracious.-- 2675:A Clockwork Orange 1352:Elric of Melnibone 1200:You talkin' to me? 531:A Clockwork Orange 5138: 5121:comment added by 5089: 5072:comment added by 5048:comment added by 4991:comment added by 4816:comment added by 4774:comment added by 4742: 4725:comment added by 4424:comment added by 4388:comment added by 4357:original research 4336:comment added by 4230: 4218:comment added by 4188: 4176:comment added by 4150: 4138:comment added by 4113: 4101:comment added by 4050: 4038:comment added by 4028: 4019:comment added by 3987: 3971:comment added by 3957: 3941:comment added by 3894: 3878:comment added by 3835: 3823:comment added by 3734: 3718:comment added by 3649:original research 3538:original research 3532: 3516:comment added by 3399:original research 3319: 3305:comment added by 3288: 3276:comment added by 3212:Commander Regulus 3191:Commander Regulus 3169: 3157:comment added by 2920:original research 2829: 2813:comment added by 2799: 2787:comment added by 2715:Metal Gear Series 2415:original research 2304:original research 2294: 2285:comment added by 2071:just a villain.-- 1895: 1883:comment added by 1734: 1719:Darth Mandalorian 1670:Commander Regulus 1636: 1613: 1548: 1507: 1434: 1394:comment added by 1378: 1364:comment added by 1337: 1328:comment added by 1285: 1266:been part of the 1221: 1186: 1172:comment added by 1147: 903: 886:comment added by 804:original research 522:original research 440: 428:comment added by 81:comment added by 70:Anakin Skywalker? 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5143: 5137: 5115: 5088: 5066: 5060: 5003: 4828: 4786: 4741: 4719: 4436: 4400: 4348: 4213: 4171: 4133: 4096: 4033: 4014: 3966: 3936: 3873: 3818: 3713: 3511: 3376:Mikhail Bulgakov 3318: 3299: 3271: 3152: 2808: 2782: 2280: 1878: 1804:How about these: 1712: 1618: 1595: 1530: 1489: 1470:Star Fox Command 1466:Star Fox Assault 1416: 1406: 1377: 1358: 1323: 1286: 1279: 1276: 1222: 1215: 1212: 1185: 1166: 902: 880: 423: 147: 141: 140: 93: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5151: 5150: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5116: 5096: 5067: 5043: 5009: 4986: 4983: 4915:Ichigo Kurosaki 4882: 4834: 4811: 4808: 4769: 4762: 4747:Liberal Classic 4727:Liberal Classic 4720: 4653: 4651:Thomas Covenant 4608: 4570: 4567: 4419: 4383: 4331: 4255: 4250: 4247: 4210: 3963: 3958: 3900:Bride of Chucky 3861: 3808: 3710: 3679:201.238.124.206 3675: 3574: 3473: 3372: 3300: 3295: 3278:207.162.169.205 3239: 3186: 3149: 3134:Shakesomeaction 3086: 3001:Shakesomeaction 2992:Shakesomeaction 2963:Shakesomeaction 2907:Shakesomeaction 2875:Shakesomeaction 2815:Shakesomeaction 2805: 2779: 2704: 2679:American Psycho 2276: 2101: 2019: 1995: 1971: 1932: 1906: 1901: 1847: 1832: 1765: 1713:—The preceding 1709: 1619:—The preceding 1596:—The preceding 1531:—The preceding 1490:—The preceding 1417:—The preceding 1412: 1389: 1359: 1354: 1301: 1274: 1271: 1210: 1207: 1192: 1167: 1150: 1034: 1010: 977: 952: 929: 881: 758: 672:Hannibal Rising 621:Hannibal Lecter 595: 580: 481: 304: 161:CameoAppearance 157: 143: 135: 119: 99: 83:174.102.192.217 76: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5149: 5147: 5095: 5092: 5091: 5090: 5050:94.193.132.142 5039: 5008: 5007:Pointless list 5005: 4982: 4979: 4978: 4977: 4881: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4833: 4830: 4807: 4804: 4803: 4802: 4792:CyberGhostface 4761: 4758: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4685: 4684: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4652: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4637:CyberGhostface 4607: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4592:CyberGhostface 4569: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4518:CyberGhostface 4471:CyberGhostface 4442:CyberGhostface 4405:CyberGhostface 4361:CyberGhostface 4317:CyberGhostface 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4275:CyberGhostface 4254: 4251: 4248: 4246: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4209: 4206: 4205: 4204: 4167: 4166: 4156:CyberGhostface 4130: 4129: 4119:CyberGhostface 4089: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4076:CyberGhostface 4057:CyberGhostface 4005: 4004: 3994:CyberGhostface 3962: 3959: 3935: 3931: 3930: 3920:CyberGhostface 3912:Seed Of Chucky 3910:which states " 3860: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3845:CyberGhostface 3841: 3825:192.197.54.136 3807: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3788:CyberGhostface 3773:General kaiden 3758:CyberGhostface 3743:General kaiden 3709: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3694:CyberGhostface 3674: 3671: 3669: 3667: 3666: 3656:CyberGhostface 3652: 3630: 3627: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3587: 3584: 3573: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3556:CyberGhostface 3542:CyberGhostface 3472: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3449: 3417:CyberGhostface 3403:CyberGhostface 3371: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3294: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3268: 3258:CyberGhostface 3238: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3228:CyberGhostface 3207: 3206: 3201:CyberGhostface 3185: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3175:CyberGhostface 3159:76.122.145.130 3148: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3130: 3125: 3105:CyberGhostface 3085: 3084:"Official mod" 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3073:CyberGhostface 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3019:CyberGhostface 3014: 3010: 2987: 2982:CyberGhostface 2968: 2936: 2932: 2866:CyberGhostface 2858: 2835:CyberGhostface 2804: 2801: 2789:69.248.111.206 2778: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2768:CyberGhostface 2745: 2744: 2743: 2738: 2735: 2730:CyberGhostface 2703: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2670: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2624:CyberGhostface 2620: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2590: 2581:CyberGhostface 2561:CyberGhostface 2541:CyberGhostface 2536: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2473: 2470: 2466: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2431:CyberGhostface 2426: 2422: 2399: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2331:CyberGhostface 2312:CyberGhostface 2307: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2236: 2229: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2205:CyberGhostface 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2175:CyberGhostface 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2149: 2148: 2143:CyberGhostface 2123: 2122: 2117:CyberGhostface 2100: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2082:AstrolobeJones 2073:CyberGhostface 2063:AstrolobeJones 2053:AstrolobeJones 2035:CyberGhostface 2024:AstrolobeJones 2018: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2003:CyberGhostface 1994: 1991: 1970: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1943: 1931: 1928: 1922: 1917: 1905: 1902: 1900: 1897: 1861: 1860: 1855:CyberGhostface 1846: 1843: 1831: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1821:CyberGhostface 1806: 1805: 1802: 1797:CyberGhostface 1793: 1778:for violating 1764: 1761: 1759: 1747: 1746: 1708: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1696:CyberGhostface 1681:CyberGhostface 1666: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1590: 1587: 1582: 1577: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1553:CyberGhostface 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1478:Wolf O'Donnell 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1453:character list 1440:CyberGhostface 1411: 1408: 1381: 1366:76.203.14.200 1353: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1343:CyberGhostface 1319: 1318: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1250: 1249: 1236: 1191: 1188: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1114: 1110: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1033: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1004: 994:Talk:Anti-hero 976: 973: 972: 971: 951: 948: 947: 946: 928: 925: 924: 923: 913:CyberGhostface 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 789: 781:CyberGhostface 757: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 737:CyberGhostface 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 677:CyberGhostface 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 633: 632: 631: 630: 612:CyberGhostface 594: 591: 579: 576: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 541: 534: 526: 480: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 445:CyberGhostface 415:CyberGhostface 395:CyberGhostface 373:CyberGhostface 360:CyberGhostface 347: 328:Talk:Evolution 303: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 284: 283: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 178: 177: 156: 153: 118: 117:Severus Snape? 115: 98: 95: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5148: 5139: 5136: 5132: 5128: 5124: 5120: 5113: 5110: 5108: 5104: 5099: 5093: 5087: 5083: 5079: 5075: 5071: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5059: 5055: 5051: 5047: 5040: 5037: 5033: 5030: 5027: 5023: 5019: 5015: 5012: 5006: 5004: 5002: 4998: 4994: 4993:204.94.248.12 4990: 4980: 4976: 4972: 4968: 4964: 4960: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4954: 4950: 4946: 4942: 4938: 4934: 4929: 4927: 4923: 4918: 4916: 4912: 4911:Sasuke Uchiha 4907: 4904: 4903:Asuka Langley 4899: 4897: 4893: 4891: 4886: 4879: 4873: 4869: 4865: 4860: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4831: 4829: 4827: 4823: 4819: 4815: 4805: 4801: 4797: 4793: 4789: 4788: 4787: 4785: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4767: 4759: 4757: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4743: 4740: 4736: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4718: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4672: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4661: 4659: 4650: 4646: 4642: 4638: 4634: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4627: 4623: 4619: 4617: 4612: 4605: 4601: 4597: 4593: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4537: 4534: 4531:anti-hero. -- 4529: 4528: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4509: 4505: 4500: 4496: 4492: 4491: 4490: 4487: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4467:User:Doczilla 4464: 4459: 4458: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4447: 4443: 4438: 4437: 4435: 4431: 4427: 4423: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4410: 4406: 4402: 4401: 4399: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4381: 4377: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4354: 4350: 4349: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4307: 4303: 4302:Xprivate eyex 4293: 4290: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4252: 4244: 4240: 4237: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4229: 4225: 4221: 4220:66.229.233.34 4217: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4187: 4183: 4179: 4178:71.107.195.68 4175: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4149: 4145: 4141: 4137: 4128: 4124: 4120: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4112: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4094: 4091:how's this? 4085: 4081: 4077: 4072: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4040:71.105.255.37 4037: 4032: 4026: 4022: 4021:71.105.255.37 4018: 4013: 4010: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3934: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3870: 3867: 3864: 3858: 3854: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3822: 3815: 3812: 3805: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3778: 3774: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3735: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3707: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3672: 3670: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3650: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3628: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3585: 3582: 3578: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3508: 3507: 3504: 3501: 3498: 3495: 3490: 3489: 3486: 3483: 3480: 3476: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3432: 3431:New Statesman 3428: 3427: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3370: 3367: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3307:75.66.134.228 3304: 3292: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3269: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3243:98.200.242.98 3237:Randall Flagg 3236: 3232: 3229: 3224: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3213: 3205: 3202: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3192: 3183: 3179: 3176: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3146: 3138: 3135: 3131: 3129: 3126: 3123: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3115: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3106: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3096: 3092: 3083: 3077: 3074: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3061: 3036: 3033: 3028: 3023: 3020: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3002: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2993: 2988: 2986: 2983: 2978: 2973: 2972: 2969: 2967: 2964: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2937: 2933: 2930: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2895: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2885: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2857: 2854: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2845: 2844:ButteredToast 2841: 2840: 2839: 2836: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2803:Anti-Heroines 2802: 2800: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2776: 2772: 2769: 2765: 2762: 2760: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2751: 2742: 2736: 2734: 2731: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2721: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2702: 2698: 2695: 2691: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2671: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2663: 2659: 2628: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2616: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2603: 2600: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2582: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2572: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2562: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2552: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2542: 2537: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2507: 2504: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2474: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2427: 2423: 2420: 2419:point of view 2416: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2379: 2376: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2332: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2322: 2321:ButteredToast 2318: 2317: 2316: 2313: 2308: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2292: 2288: 2287:138.88.55.248 2284: 2273: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2241: 2240:ButteredToast 2237: 2234: 2230: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2197: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2179: 2176: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2161: 2158: 2157:ButteredToast 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2144: 2140: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2129: 2121: 2118: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2107: 2098: 2086: 2083: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2074: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2064: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2054: 2050: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2036: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2025: 2017:I killed Iago 2016: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1992: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1981: 1979: 1974: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1948: 1944: 1941: 1937: 1929: 1927: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1911: 1903: 1898: 1896: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1885:66.229.233.34 1882: 1874: 1873: 1870: 1865: 1859: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1844: 1842: 1841: 1838: 1829: 1825: 1822: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1812: 1803: 1801: 1798: 1794: 1792: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1770: 1762: 1760: 1757: 1756: 1753: 1745: 1742: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1706: 1700: 1697: 1693: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1682: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1671: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1642: 1638: 1637: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1625:81.216.251.71 1622: 1615: 1614: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1602:122.2.112.253 1599: 1594: 1591: 1588: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1557: 1554: 1550: 1549: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1516: 1513: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1487: 1486:Leon Powalski 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1441: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1409: 1407: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1396:84.203.36.251 1393: 1388: 1385: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1351: 1347: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1331: 1330:138.88.55.248 1327: 1317: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1306: 1298: 1296: 1289: 1283: 1278: 1277: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1219: 1214: 1213: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1196:Travis Bickle 1189: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1164: 1160: 1155: 1143: 1140: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1125: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1099: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1077:Good enough? 1075: 1072: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1039: 1031: 1027: 1024: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1007: 1003: 1000: 995: 990: 989: 988: 986: 983: 974: 970: 967: 963: 962: 961: 960: 957: 949: 945: 942: 938: 937: 936: 934: 933:Ratchetcomand 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 906: 905: 904: 901: 897: 893: 889: 885: 864: 861: 856: 855: 852: 851: 850: 847: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 827: 823: 819: 814: 813: 812: 809: 805: 800: 799: 798: 795: 790: 787: 786: 785: 782: 778: 774: 769: 768: 767: 766: 763: 741: 738: 734: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 707: 704: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 690: 681: 678: 674: 673: 668: 667: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 647: 644: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 629: 626: 622: 618: 617: 616: 613: 609: 605: 601: 600: 599: 592: 590: 589: 586: 577: 575: 574: 571: 570:24.186.66.167 560: 557: 552: 551: 550: 547: 542: 539: 535: 532: 527: 523: 519: 518:verifiability 515: 511: 510: 509: 506: 502: 497: 496: 495: 494: 491: 487: 478: 454: 450: 446: 442: 441: 439: 435: 431: 430:66.177.182.30 427: 421: 420: 419: 416: 411: 410: 409: 406: 401: 400: 399: 396: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 384: 379: 378: 377: 374: 370: 366: 365: 364: 361: 357: 356: 355: 352: 348: 346: 343: 338: 337: 336: 333: 329: 324: 323:Paradise Lost 320: 319: 318: 317: 314: 310: 301: 295: 292: 288: 287: 286: 285: 282: 279: 275: 271: 270: 269: 252: 248: 247: 242: 238: 237: 236:The Libertine 232: 227: 226: 225: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 205: 203: 199: 198: 197: 194: 189: 188: 186: 182: 181: 180: 179: 176: 173: 168: 167: 166: 165: 162: 155:awkward title 154: 152: 151: 148: 146: 139: 132: 131: 128: 127:66.41.117.220 124: 116: 114: 113: 109: 105: 96: 94: 92: 88: 84: 80: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5114: 5111: 5100: 5097: 5074:Fungalphobia 5041: 5038: 5034: 5031: 5028: 5024: 5020: 5016: 5013: 5010: 4984: 4933:Phoenix Ikki 4930: 4919: 4908: 4900: 4894: 4890:Shinji Ikari 4887: 4883: 4859:protagonists 4858: 4835: 4818:24.10.68.240 4809: 4776:76.177.70.94 4763: 4760:Bill Compton 4744: 4714: 4654: 4620: 4613: 4609: 4571: 4498: 4494: 4426:98.26.244.99 4390:98.26.244.99 4379: 4376:protagonists 4375: 4352: 4338:152.33.62.57 4298: 4259:Sunsetterxxx 4256: 4211: 4168: 4140:71.105.31.25 4131: 4103:71.105.28.22 4090: 4006: 3964: 3932: 3916:Child's Play 3915: 3911: 3904:Child's Play 3903: 3899: 3871: 3868: 3865: 3862: 3816: 3813: 3809: 3736: 3711: 3708:Arthur Dent? 3676: 3668: 3629: 3626: 3586: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3518:Wuffiekun123 3509: 3491: 3477: 3474: 3373: 3296: 3240: 3222: 3208: 3187: 3150: 3127: 3121: 3090: 3087: 3060:Zzz sleeping 3057: 2976: 2948: 2945:definitively 2944: 2940: 2928: 2924:definitively 2923: 2902: 2898: 2893: 2861: 2806: 2780: 2746: 2705: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2657: 2655: 2559:nominator.-- 2410: 2406: 2402: 2277: 2232: 2200: 2195: 2173:character.-- 2137: 2124: 2102: 2048: 2043: 2020: 1996: 1982: 1975: 1972: 1945: 1936:Samuel Vimes 1933: 1930:Samuel Vimes 1907: 1875: 1866: 1862: 1848: 1833: 1807: 1766: 1758: 1748: 1710: 1678: 1665: 1537:122.2.127.32 1496:122.2.127.32 1423:122.2.127.32 1413: 1380: 1355: 1320: 1302: 1294: 1272: 1268:Five pillars 1263: 1231: 1208: 1193: 1151: 1126: 1124:Any better? 1123: 1119: 1116: 1106: 1102: 1079: 1076: 1073: 1054:Here you go: 1053: 1035: 1011: 982:86.17.163.37 978: 953: 930: 877: 776: 759: 732: 670: 664: 607: 603: 596: 581: 567: 530: 505:81.191.14.79 500: 482: 322: 308: 305: 266: 244: 234: 158: 144: 133: 122: 120: 100: 73: 60: 43: 37: 5117:—Preceding 5068:—Preceding 5044:—Preceding 4987:—Preceding 4963:1984 (book) 4880:Anime/Manga 4812:—Preceding 4770:—Preceding 4721:—Preceding 4420:—Preceding 4384:—Preceding 4380:antagonists 4378:, they are 4332:—Preceding 4214:—Preceding 4172:—Preceding 4134:—Preceding 4097:—Preceding 4034:—Preceding 4015:—Preceding 3967:—Preceding 3937:—Preceding 3908:this review 3874:—Preceding 3819:—Preceding 3720:Jessnotdean 3714:—Preceding 3512:—Preceding 3301:—Preceding 3272:—Preceding 3153:—Preceding 2809:—Preceding 2783:—Preceding 2711:Solid Snake 2701:Solid Snake 2539:character-- 2469:attributes. 2281:—Preceding 1985:Corrupt one 1976:"*Eventual 1879:—Preceding 1869:Corrupt one 1837:Corrupt one 1763:Jack Carver 1752:Corrupt one 1474:second game 1390:—Preceding 1360:—Preceding 1324:—Preceding 1305:Jackbalck23 1168:—Preceding 882:—Preceding 424:—Preceding 77:—Preceding 36:This is an 4945:Uberflaven 4937:Seto Kaiba 4844:Uberflaven 4766:True Blood 3786:Dent's.)-- 3673:spiderman! 3634:SeanMike77 3352:Uberflaven 3124:Good Show! 2905:/end rant 2860:Thanks, I 2750:Jagged Fel 2720:Jagged Fel 2579:sources.-- 2429:daring"?-- 2403:irrevelant 2139:anti-hero. 1978:redemption 1232:themselves 1174:Snowgrouse 1038:Duke Nukem 1032:Duke Nukem 956:69.9.30.57 514:User:Ifrit 393:general.-- 97:The Doctor 4071:this link 3973:Camcamfee 3943:Brendonnn 3880:Brendonnn 3293:Ben Linus 3071:reason.-- 2949:described 2941:objective 2713:from the 2707:This page 2662:DarkStar0 2619:sections. 2613:DarkStar0 2571:DarkStar0 2551:DarkStar0 2503:DarkStar0 2375:DarkStar0 1940:Discworld 1914:Discworld 1910:Rincewind 1904:Rincewind 1899:Discworld 1811:Smiley200 1769:Smiley200 1692:Ben Linus 1472:. In the 1449:Star Wolf 1410:Star Wolf 1154:Blake's 7 1148:Blake's 7 1128:Vgamer101 1081:Vgamer101 1018:Anti-hero 987:(Harley) 405:Eno-Etile 383:Eno-Etile 351:Eno-Etile 309:fictional 274:anti-hero 104:JasonJD48 61:Archive 1 5131:contribs 5123:Stevehim 5119:unsigned 5082:contribs 5070:unsigned 5046:unsigned 4989:unsigned 4864:Stevehim 4814:unsigned 4806:Deadpool 4772:unsigned 4735:contribs 4723:unsigned 4715:Source: 4622:Weyoun47 4578:JB Adder 4422:unsigned 4386:unsigned 4334:unsigned 4216:unsigned 4174:unsigned 4136:unsigned 4099:unsigned 4069:I found 4036:unsigned 4017:unsigned 3981:contribs 3969:unsigned 3951:contribs 3939:unsigned 3888:contribs 3876:unsigned 3821:unsigned 3728:contribs 3716:unsigned 3526:contribs 3514:unsigned 3384:Fuzzform 3337:Doczilla 3315:contribs 3303:unsigned 3274:unsigned 3155:unsigned 3114:Doczilla 3095:Doczilla 3032:Doczilla 2894:does not 2823:contribs 2811:unsigned 2785:unsigned 2589:example: 2310:point.-- 2283:unsigned 2250:Fuzzform 2128:Leocomix 2106:Leocomix 1955:Terraxos 1881:unsigned 1788:Doczilla 1727:contribs 1715:unsigned 1641:Doczilla 1621:unsigned 1598:unsigned 1533:unsigned 1492:unsigned 1419:unsigned 1392:unsigned 1374:contribs 1362:unsigned 1357:helpful. 1326:unsigned 1313:Doczilla 1275:howcheng 1211:howcheng 1182:contribs 1170:unsigned 1159:Farscape 1152:Most of 896:contribs 884:unsigned 860:Doczilla 818:Karinagw 703:Leocomix 666:Hannibal 643:Leocomix 608:Hannibal 604:Hannibal 593:Hannibal 583:here. -- 501:reviewed 426:unsigned 291:Doczilla 202:User:CWL 185:User:CWL 145:STHayden 79:unsigned 4967:Albmont 4922:Piccolo 4194:Albmont 3739:article 3325:WP:NPOV 3226:such.-- 3184:Alastor 2977:several 2201:whoever 2115:left.-- 2033:dead.-- 1916:novels. 1784:WP:NPOV 1235:images. 1163:Firefly 888:Largoss 777:despite 775:. And " 479:Sources 413:stay.-- 369:WP:NPOV 342:Tren001 313:Tren001 302:Lucifer 246:Amadeus 39:archive 5107:policy 5094:Gollum 4926:Vegeta 4504:Gelmax 3859:Chucky 3369:Woland 3331:, and 3329:WP:NOR 2777:Crypto 2683:Lolita 2407:plenty 1780:WP:NOR 1707:Vegeta 1484:, and 1264:always 1240:WP:FUC 1190:Images 975:Batman 578:Images 241:Mozart 4941:Mello 4499:title 4495:isn't 4055:up.-- 3992:is.-- 3374:From 2465:once. 846:DrBat 794:DrBat 762:DrBat 602:Read 172:Ifrit 16:< 5127:talk 5109:. 5103:here 5078:talk 5054:talk 4997:talk 4971:talk 4949:talk 4939:and 4868:talk 4848:talk 4822:talk 4796:talk 4780:talk 4751:talk 4731:talk 4641:talk 4626:talk 4616:link 4596:talk 4582:Talk 4522:talk 4508:talk 4475:talk 4465:and 4446:talk 4430:talk 4409:talk 4394:talk 4365:talk 4342:talk 4321:talk 4306:talk 4279:talk 4263:talk 4224:talk 4198:talk 4182:talk 4160:talk 4144:talk 4123:talk 4107:talk 4080:talk 4061:talk 4044:talk 4025:talk 3998:talk 3977:talk 3947:talk 3924:talk 3884:talk 3849:talk 3829:talk 3792:talk 3777:talk 3762:talk 3747:talk 3724:talk 3698:talk 3683:talk 3660:talk 3638:talk 3560:talk 3546:talk 3522:talk 3457:talk 3443:talk 3421:talk 3407:talk 3388:talk 3356:talk 3341:talk 3333:WP:V 3311:talk 3282:talk 3262:talk 3247:talk 3223:tons 3163:talk 2916:WP:V 2819:talk 2793:talk 2699:and 2417:and 2411:your 2302:and 2291:talk 2254:talk 1959:talk 1889:talk 1782:and 1723:talk 1629:talk 1606:talk 1541:talk 1500:talk 1451:and 1427:talk 1400:talk 1370:talk 1334:talk 1282:chat 1218:chat 1178:talk 1161:and 1091:this 917:talk 892:talk 822:talk 773:NPOV 669:and 619:The 520:and 449:talk 434:talk 326:the 276:. -- 249:. -- 239:and 108:talk 87:talk 4768:? 4382:. 4359:.-- 3401:.-- 3378:'s 3013:it. 2300:POV 2196:can 1386:or 733:was 251:CWL 243:in 233:in 5133:) 5129:• 5084:) 5080:• 5056:) 4999:) 4973:) 4951:) 4935:, 4870:) 4850:) 4824:) 4798:) 4782:) 4753:) 4737:) 4733:• 4643:) 4628:) 4598:) 4580:| 4533:TM 4524:) 4510:) 4486:TM 4477:) 4448:) 4432:) 4411:) 4396:) 4367:) 4353:or 4344:) 4323:) 4308:) 4289:TM 4281:) 4269:) 4265:) 4236:TM 4226:) 4200:) 4184:) 4162:) 4146:) 4125:) 4109:) 4082:) 4063:) 4046:) 4000:) 3983:) 3979:• 3953:) 3949:• 3926:) 3890:) 3886:• 3851:) 3831:) 3794:) 3779:) 3764:) 3749:) 3730:) 3726:• 3700:) 3685:) 3662:) 3640:) 3562:) 3548:) 3528:) 3524:• 3459:) 3445:) 3433:, 3423:) 3409:) 3390:) 3358:) 3343:) 3327:, 3317:) 3313:• 3284:) 3264:) 3249:) 3165:) 3091:if 2953:TM 2884:TM 2862:am 2853:TM 2825:) 2821:• 2795:) 2687:TM 2256:) 2104:-- 2049:do 1961:) 1891:) 1786:. 1741:TM 1739:-- 1729:) 1725:• 1631:) 1608:) 1543:) 1512:TM 1502:) 1488:. 1480:, 1429:) 1402:) 1376:) 1372:• 1244:TM 1184:) 1180:• 1139:TM 1095:TM 1046:TM 1023:TM 999:TM 997:-- 966:TM 941:TM 919:) 911:-- 898:) 894:• 824:) 808:TM 792:-- 625:TM 585:TM 556:TM 554:-- 546:TM 490:TM 451:) 436:) 332:TM 278:TM 221:TM 215:, 211:, 193:TM 191:-- 170:-- 110:) 89:) 5125:( 5076:( 5052:( 4995:( 4969:( 4947:( 4866:( 4846:( 4820:( 4794:( 4778:( 4749:( 4729:( 4639:( 4624:( 4594:( 4520:( 4506:( 4473:( 4444:( 4428:( 4407:( 4392:( 4363:( 4340:( 4319:( 4304:( 4277:( 4261:( 4222:( 4196:( 4180:( 4158:( 4142:( 4121:( 4105:( 4078:( 4059:( 4042:( 4023:( 3996:( 3975:( 3945:( 3922:( 3882:( 3847:( 3827:( 3790:( 3775:( 3760:( 3745:( 3722:( 3696:( 3681:( 3658:( 3636:( 3558:( 3544:( 3520:( 3455:( 3441:( 3419:( 3405:( 3386:( 3354:( 3339:( 3309:( 3280:( 3260:( 3245:( 3161:( 3024:\ 2817:( 2791:( 2739:* 2421:. 2306:. 2289:( 2252:( 2044:I 1957:( 1887:( 1733:. 1721:( 1635:. 1627:( 1612:. 1604:( 1547:. 1539:( 1506:. 1498:( 1433:. 1425:( 1398:( 1368:( 1332:( 1284:} 1280:{ 1220:} 1216:{ 1176:( 950:V 915:( 890:( 820:( 447:( 432:( 371:. 106:( 85:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index