Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:List of fictional doomsday devices

Source 📝

1535:
then sets about thinking up all the times that a planet has ever been destroyed in the entire history of speculative fiction". In addition, several of Keeps in the previous discussion said "but expand and source" or similar, in the months since it has not notably improved, not following the rules of Knowledge (XXG). Keep in mind that as you vote, your supposed to be voting for what best follows the rules of Knowledge (XXG), not how much you like or think the artical can improve. As an alternative, I offer the suggestion that this article would make a much better List article, List of Planet Destroying devices for instance, as the worst part that without doubt cannot possibly be sourced is the bulk of the actual sentences the "To Kill a Planet" section, Death Stars and Vorlon ships can be sourced, even if a unified explanation for how to destroy a planet with all of these terms cannot.
535: 1526:
opinion destroy a planet. It is not vandalism, putting it back would be vandalism though. Bloody bot thinks its vandalism and isn't a great conversationalist so I posted I message where its said and that should get cleared up, feel free to try and fix the article first, but I don't think its possible unless Star Trek and Star Wars writers got together to make a "How to Destroy the World" book, realistically, this would make a great List article.
310: 289: 720: 243: 218: 146: 125: 425: 394: 591: 567: 819: 798: 94: 435: 320: 1599:
definition, and a list of references from sci-fi. It's something that would be great to have at TV Tropes, I'm sure (actually, they've got one - "Earth Shattering Kaboom"). It boggles my mind that this wasn't deleted last time around. Maybe there was some hope that the article would turn into something useful, somehow? It's been three years, the article is nothing but a trivia hoard.
601: 710: 689: 57: 21: 661: 515: 897: 2002:(complete) list of planet killers, and it therefore needs to be careful to only include planet killers which are notable (ie, themselves the subject of significant discussion in reliable independent sources). That notability needs to be backed by sources. The article does not yet meet that standard, hence the tags remain. Thanks. - 1572:
Actually I've changed my mind, this could be an okay article. First it would need to become a List of Planet Killers or Planet Destroyers or some such, as that is the part that really has any future. The text on how to theoretically destroy a planet is completely original research from some fansite,
1568:
Ah, right, that would be the right one then, sorry, as I said, I've never deleted an article and to be honest I've gotten to bit rusty on the rules and everything here, but yes I think this should be deleted. No reliable source I've ever heard of groups all methods from various science fiction and
1224:
That's a case of a common phenomenon: canon/science conflict. The Death Star is not supposed to have the power to destroy a planet significantly larger than the Earth-like planets it demonstrates capacity to destroy - but the blast it produces is such overkill that it could obviously do much more.
1005:
Is 'planet killer' the most widely used term for this type of device (outside of Babylon 5)? As I noted in the article, Star Wars uses 'superweapon'. A Fire Upon the Deep uses 'world-wrecker'. Some non-canon Star Trek materials used 'planetcracker' or 'planet wrecker'. I seem to recall having read
1853:
I thought the Star Wars part of this list was falling behind, so I updated it using the wookieepedia articles for the respective superweapons. I don't know if this is the right thing to do, but wookieepedia far surpasses wikipedia in terms of SW articles. I tried to put in only weapons capable of
1534:
Alright, I set it up as a candidate for deletion, following policy, my first time so it might not look quite as clean as others. Reasons, well in the words of the last person to nominate it for this, "Total original research, from premise to execution. Takes a contrived term ("Planet killer") and
1143:
Sounds like a plan. I added a bunch of redirect pages for some of the more "likely" names (IMHO). Check the "what links here" page for the article for a full list. If anyone know of more "synonymes" for "planet killer" that people would be likely to search for pleace add those too. I merely added
1886:
Well if those are those rules, those are the rules. I must say it is pretty stupid considering how poor the wiki SW articles are compared to the well referenced and detailed articles on wookieepedia. I am going to at least post a link at the bottom of the page to provide a good list of Star Wars
1525:
Just horrible, its like a list with an essay from a really bored guy with too much time on his hands. I'm deleting the parapgraphs of original research, opinion and plot explanations, you want to right it somewhere, go make a website, this is not the place to explain how to theoretically in your
2378:
per the nominator's rationale. The list is pretty broad and includes a number of "doomsday devices" that aren't specifically deployed against planets — like those meant to destroy stars (e.g., the Tox Uthat) or even the entire universe (e.g., Hactar's bomb). The proposed title more accurately
1779:
What we really need is a new Wikiproject specifically for this sort of article. It could be called WikiTrivia or something along those lines (assuming someone hasn't already used that name for something else). It would fix the problem of these sort of articles making Knowledge (XXG) look less
1598:
Submitted again to AFD. "Planet Killer" is, by itself, a pretty vague term. Its only meaning is "that which kills a planet". Also, at present anyway, none are known to actually exist. Naturally, therefore, the article contains no useful information about them. It just boils down to the basic
1270:
IIRC, wasn't the Known Space Bussard Ramjet supposed to destroy life on the planet via the direct application of its magnetic fields? I know that Niven makes repeated references (albeit poorly explained) in multiple stories to the point that being exposed to the field of an active ramjet is
1780:
serious. Also, less formal content guidelines would benefit these kind of pages as well. Reading and contributing to these more fun articles is something I certainly enjoy, and I wouldn't want to see them all disappear in the name of making Knowledge (XXG) look more formal and professional.
1756:
That seems to be the basic rundown. Limiting reporting on facts in wikipedia is an important goal if we are to rely on amateur editors. It sometimes results in crappy outcomes (articles like this one might get the axe), but it makes our claims to legitimacy that much stronger.
2040:
I came across this article and I must ask: Why is the literature section broken up in three entries, which are two short entries for specific series, then a major entry named "Other literature"? This seems incoherent, so I'm just going to eliminate the subcategories altogether.
2079:
As within the line of Dragon Ball enemies, none of the enemies (except for Birus in Battle of Gods) and Goku (supposedly, in the fight against Cell) were to destroy the Earth. Both Raditz, Vegeta and Nappa were only to conquer Earth in the name of Frieza (as it was
1672:
Dunno, although it nowadays seems that there are as many interpretations of OR as there are editors, it is not and it has not been a practice to consider uncontroversial descriptive claims about the content of a work OR. Have you ever tried writing an article about
1911:
isn't weighty enough in the List article here: It's one of only two fictional references that gets mention in lead, for example. There is no "race" or "competition" in a List article: It's incumbent on the target article to address the specific
2107:
There are already plenty of examples in the Star Trek section - the list is not meant to be exhaustive. More addition are just crufty, and we could say that sources are needed to classify most of these as true "planet killers" - for example:
1445:
What about the Obliterator weapons used by the Honoured Matres and later Omnius in the Dune science fiction novels? They are able to destroy all life on most planets hit by them, the exception being on Dune, where the giant Sandworms survive.
1997:
Just replaced the cleanup tags on the article which Dreamfocus in good faith removed. My reasoning is that the list still has many non-notable entries and the vast majority of entries are unsourced. This list is not capable of being an
1035:
Of course the name is fictitious - there are no real weapons of this power. It would be an acceptable name if it were the standard science fiction term, but it isn't. What did you mean by "interplanar weapon"? I've never heard that term.
958:
Is Halo really a planet killer? It doesn't really kill planets, or even mess up their enivironments. As far as anybody knows, it just kills sentient life. I guess it'd qualify as a super-weapon, but it's not technically a planet killer.
1184:, which does not quite refer to Star Wars itself. Should the link be changed or removed or should there be an added article or is there an article available that refers to the actual text of the link -- namely, Base Delta Zero itself? 967:
In literature, quick methods of destruction are also used. An example (which I've seen in a couple independent novels, and which also is a method of planet destruction that doesn't require one ultimate one-of-a-kind weapon): In the
1573:
completely inappropriate material for wiki here. Sources can also be gathered for a List type, Death Star comes from Star Wars Ep 4, Death Star II comes from 6, Vorlon Planet Killer comes from Babylon 5 season 3 episode ??, etc.
2322:– I do not see what is particularly notable to something being a "planet killer" rather than a doomsday device in general. Especially since the article contains several doomsday devices that are not planet killers, like the 2338:, which in turn can link here for notable examples. (P.S. "Planet killer" itself is open to interpretation - global warming is a real life "planet killer" and the article doesn't specify whether it has to be fictional). 1545:
The "prod" has been removed... it seems you are looking for a deletion discussion, rather than the "auto-delete after five days if there's no objection" that a "prod" brings. Please indicate if this is the case.
1239:
Mass Shadow Generators do not kill planets (except Centerpoint Station). They drag ships out of hyperspace. If it was so, then Interdictor cruisers would be able to wipe out planets. I'm removing that one.
1336:
I thought there were flashbacks of Florida being torn in two with a giant laser running down the center from top to bottom. I don't think Earth was destoyed, but it could have been, right? I am not sure.--
2602: 1944:
Black Sun does not destroy planets. All it actually does is the destroy the ability of people from using th quantum gate network, which is kind of like the stargates from any of the Stargate series.
2527:
I'll assume my edits were removed because of me not citing sources, but does the stellaris wiki count as a reliable source seeing as it's directly supported and referenced by Paradox themselves?
2184: 524: 404: 544: 408: 1162:
This has to be one of the poorest written articles I've ever read. "Nigh-indestructible"? "These were destroyed by pitting them against the only foe that could defeat them-themselves."
2597: 941: 2612: 1811:: a device that short-circuits all stars in universe through the hyperspace, and makes them all explode like supernovas. That's a planet killer indeed, and of course forgotten! Said: 549: 1118:
We should just stick with "Planet Killer" and make redirects for the more plausible names. They all mean much the same thing anyway, and there is little terminological consensus. --
992:
cee-fractional kinetic strikes to obliterate a planet is a violation of the Deneb Accords, and it'll bring the Solarian League down upon you like there's no tomorrow. . . ;) --
2607: 376: 670: 577: 75: 2469: 2465: 2451: 1869:
We generally don't consider other wiki's to be reliable sources on which we base our content. If these weapons have been discussed by something that would qualify as a
2577: 366: 39: 1569:
fantasy sources for destroying a planet together and attempt to explain them. Lacking reliable sources its original research from a fan boy and has no place here.
780: 2582: 875: 342: 2572: 1215:
It is impossible for the Death Star to produce thirty-thousand years worth of Sol's output in a single blast. The STAR WARS novelization even states this.
2647: 770: 2662: 865: 505: 1249: 200: 2652: 2026: 1065:
could work too, though many of the weapons listed don't destroy the planet as such, merely kill everyone and everything on it. Maybe something like
742: 333: 294: 249: 223: 2667: 2642: 2222:
There are several objects able to annihilate a planet in fantasy franchises, is there a purpose for limiting this article to science fiction ? --
841: 746: 1198:
Probably best to just redlink it, then, so that people will know that Knowledge (XXG) doesn't currently have any information about the subject.
2657: 2632: 2627: 2592: 1287:
I don't recall its ever being used on an entire planet; you'd need a pretty big field for that. If you have such a reference, please supply it.
495: 2562: 1808: 1188:
Last time I checked(when I made the link), there was no article for Base Delta Zero, so I just linked it to the closest (neutral)article. -
190: 2617: 1971: 1626: 1580: 1097:
is after all fairly commonly used to describe for life-less planets (at least in fiction) even though planets are neither alive or dead. --
2113:
According to Trip Tucker, a thousand NX-class starships would be required to replicate the Xindi super weapons effects, implying that the
470: 468:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the
2284:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
2122:
This is not a planet killer according to the article definition. Also, addition of text beginning with "Interestingly" generally isn't.
2567: 2534: 2223: 2061: 2022: 1951: 1485: 733: 694: 166: 2637: 2587: 2421: 2319: 2188: 1385: 837: 826: 803: 619: 2672: 2622: 2557: 2447:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1499:(This was originally not given its own section, so was confusingly tucked under an irrelevent heading - I moved it to its own spot. 2174: 836:-related topics on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the 2303: 1456: 2164: 2021:
What does this mean: "save for the series of monuments that produce them."? What is "them" referring to? Can someone fix it. --
1677:
without the play, entirely on the basis of its reviews and other third-party sources? Me neither, and I'd rather not try. =) --
1022:
for masses of stacked elements? We should perhaps consider renaming the title to "Planet Destroyer" or "Interplanar Weapon". --
1416:
were clearly shown warping continents. Could we call that Planet Killing technology? I can't see much surviving after that...
448: 399: 105: 162: 158: 153: 130: 631: 623: 627: 614: 572: 2512: 2393: 2275: 63: 27: 2437: 1686: 1619:
I would not like to see this article deleted. It shows an extrodrinary amount of research in litrature, film and TV.
1556: 1478:
This article is completely pointless, please remove as it serves no redeeming value and is of no benifit to anyone.
1279: 1245: 1428:
Aumaan is supposed to be capable of destroying the entire solar system. Would this be classed as a Planet Killer?--
325: 2170: 1646: 2199: 1799:
Many of the items in this article are listed two or three times. I think the whole "misc" secion was a bad idea.
2468:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1023: 2007: 1630: 1584: 2403: 2285: 1975: 1892: 1859: 111: 2227: 2065: 1955: 2538: 2503: 2429: 2145: 2088:
in the process, but not Earth itself. Cell even seemed threathened by the idea of Goku destroying the Earth
1920:
article. However, I do think an external link to the appropriate subject (specifically, "Planet killer" in
1728:
The creation of the article requires no more than naive operations from other primary or secondary sources.
1489: 1413: 1089:
though, the planet might not be alive, but IMHO stripping all life from a planet could best be described as
2530: 1981: 1947: 1622: 1576: 1481: 1452: 1373: 254: 228: 2425: 2315: 1929: 1460: 1381: 1888: 1855: 1202: 2487:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2475: 1708:
There is a secondary work that treats the subject of the article in question with significant coverage.
1429: 1216: 980:, and probably in many others, relativistic missiles are used to destroy planets with kinetic energy. -- 341:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2428:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1377: 1337: 1315: 2323: 2300: 2093: 2089: 2046: 1252:, not just any old MSG. I don't have the game, so I can't be sure how well it does the job, though. 1276: 1073:, a bit unsure about the propper grammar of that one). Other "random" names off the top of my head: 56: 20: 2003: 1785: 1181: 926: 2542: 2517: 2383: 2368: 2308: 2260: 2231: 2211: 2192: 2149: 2097: 2069: 2050: 2030: 2011: 1985: 1959: 1933: 1896: 1879: 1863: 1843: 1820: 1789: 1774: 1691: 1667: 1634: 1608: 1588: 1563: 1514: 1493: 1464: 1432: 1401: 1389: 1358: 1340: 1331: 1318: 1303: 1256: 1229: 1219: 1148: 1122: 1101: 1040: 1026: 948: 2141: 2084:
mission). Buu and Cell only wanted to fight the strongest warrior, even if that means destroying
1604: 1398: 1355: 1199: 1119: 2472:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1904: 534: 2488: 1765:) 19:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC) ^^Whoa. I wonder how that code markup is supposed to be used?  :) 2364: 2345: 2207: 1925: 1770: 1762: 1507: 1417: 1328: 1226: 1037: 1007: 981: 925:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
725: 2380: 2238: 1839: 1816: 1299: 909: 2495: 2125: 1748:
Delete--The article makes substantial transformative claims not made outside of wikipedia.
2335: 2297: 2042: 1681: 1554: 738: 338: 1870: 1642: 2454:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1781: 1014:
Agreed. I find the current title more fictious and poetic than scientific. After all a
2494:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2461: 2551: 2331: 2327: 1600: 1172: 440: 719: 309: 288: 2438:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101110034614/http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/nuclear/f.htm
2360: 2341: 2203: 2202:, I don't see anything related to planet devouring with NEO. Did I miss something? 1874: 1766: 1758: 1500: 1145: 1098: 993: 973: 618:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 2060:
Why is there a Dead Space 3 spoiler that has nothing to do with planet killers?
1835: 1812: 1295: 741:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can 606: 465: 2330:
redirects here, it doesn't seem like a notable concept in itself. I think that
737:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge (XXG) articles about 242: 217: 2460:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2402:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1718:
Keep--The article may be fleshed out with claims made by that secondary work.
1678: 1548: 1253: 1189: 969: 945: 715: 596: 590: 566: 434: 430: 424: 393: 315: 67: 1144:
some of the ones mentioned on this page (and some variations on the same). --
1177: 832: 145: 124: 31: 2441: 319: 818: 797: 635: 2117:
itself was capable of large-scale planetary devastation to some degree.
1916:
of Planet killer fully, and little explanation is needed or desired in
917:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
461: 457: 2163: 709: 688: 2218:
Why is this article limited to Science Fiction planet killers only ?
2198:
Uh, if I understood your request correctly and you are referring to
2183:
How about Neo, since he/it devours planets; wouldn't that count? —
660: 1347: 1018:
is not a living organism in itself, so can we really use the verb
514: 453: 830:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all 71: 35: 2158: 891: 87: 51: 15: 1924:
in the Wookieepedia) is perfectly appropriate in the case. —
1397:
He's already listed on the page, you may have overlooked it.
659: 533: 513: 452:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 2432:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1085:(yeah, I'm just making those up). Personaly I'm fine with 1006:'God-weapon' somewhere. Is there a generic term at all? -- 840:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 165:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 1327:
have a planet killer...) And please sign your comments.
2603:
Unknown-importance Military fiction task force articles
1830:
I think there was such a device in Janet Kagan's novel
2392:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
2237:
I agree. What examples in fantasy are there though?
1314:
Wasn't the Borg Cube in Star Trek a planet killer?--
1290:
Even so, that wouldn't amount to a planet destroyer.
337:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2464:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2288:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1854:
destroying or wiping all life on a given planet. --
528:, which deals with Military novel (prose) articles. 2406:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1907:. Looking over the article, I do not think that 1271:violently fatal to complex life forms. Reference 1369:Couldn't Unicron be consitered a planet killer? 1323:Not that I recall. (Their rivals, Species 8472, 252:, a project which is currently considered to be 2598:List-Class Military fiction task force articles 1970:Why fifth element's evil moon is not included? 940:Re: the AfD, I have begun to listify and prune 745:. To improve this article, please refer to the 634:. To improve this article, please refer to the 2613:Low-importance Science fiction novels articles 2450:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 1738:Keep--The article is not original research. 1071:Weapons of planetary scale mass destruction 351:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Science Fiction 264:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Popular culture 157:, an attempt to structure and organize all 2608:List-Class Science fiction novels articles 2528: 2420:I have just modified one external link on 2274:The following is a closed discussion of a 1873:then its inclusion may be an improvement. 792: 683: 630:. To use this banner, please refer to the 561: 388: 283: 212: 119: 93: 91: 1834:, but I read it too long ago to be sure. 1250:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II 2442:http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/nuclear/f.htm 2379:describes the true nature of the list. 161:. If you wish to help, please visit the 2578:Mid-importance science fiction articles 1412:The Dalek bombardment of Earth seen in 1235:Mass Shadow Generator: a planet killer? 794: 685: 563: 474:to talk over new ideas and suggestions. 390: 285: 214: 121: 2185:2601:183:4000:D57A:24A6:833A:47C1:C7AC 755:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Television 1424:Zone of the Enders: The Second Runner 1067:Weapons of planetary mass destruction 850:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Star Trek 7: 2583:WikiProject Science Fiction articles 2293:The result of the move request was: 1809:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy 963:Preferred methods: really preferred? 824:This article is within the scope of 731:This article is within the scope of 612:This article is within the scope of 446:This article is within the scope of 354:Template:WikiProject Science Fiction 331:This article is within the scope of 267:Template:WikiProject Popular culture 248:This article is within the scope of 151:This article is within the scope of 2573:List-Class science fiction articles 110:It is of interest to the following 2648:Low-importance television articles 2422:List of fictional doomsday devices 2320:List of fictional doomsday devices 1807:The ultimate doomsday device from 480:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Novels 14: 2663:Low-importance Star Trek articles 2424:. Please take a moment to review 1940:Black Sun from Supreme Commander? 1803:Supernova bomb missing of course! 1699:I think the argument here goes: 1075:Extermination level event trigger 668:This article is supported by the 522:This article is supported by the 175:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Lists 2267:Requested move 24 September 2017 2162: 1244:That one refers to the specific 895: 817: 796: 718: 708: 687: 644:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film 628:regional and topical task forces 599: 589: 565: 433: 423: 392: 318: 308: 287: 241: 216: 144: 123: 92: 55: 19: 2653:WikiProject Television articles 2351:02:39, 24 September 2017 (UTC) 1887:planet killers/superweapons. -- 1346:I think that was the prototype 1265: 1069:could be used (or should it be 870:This article has been rated as 775:This article has been rated as 758:Template:WikiProject Television 500:This article has been rated as 371:This article has been rated as 195:This article has been rated as 62:This article was nominated for 26:This article was nominated for 2668:WikiProject Star Trek articles 2643:List-Class television articles 2023:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 1821:17:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 1402:23:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1390:23:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1359:17:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1341:17:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1332:00:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 1319:17:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 1079:Planatary extermination weapon 853:Template:WikiProject Star Trek 1: 2658:List-Class Star Trek articles 2633:War films task force articles 2628:List-Class war films articles 2593:Low-importance novel articles 2518:07:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC) 2098:00:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC) 2012:04:43, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 1934:22:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 1897:19:40, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 1880:19:30, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 1864:19:28, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 1645:, that is the whole problem. 1474:Negative feedback for article 949:07:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 542:This article is supported by 345:and see a list of open tasks. 159:list pages on Knowledge (XXG) 2563:Low-importance List articles 2051:00:01, 25 January 2015 (UTC) 1844:00:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC) 1515:21:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 1465:18:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC) 1433:23:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1304:00:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC) 1203:03:40, 19 October 2005 (UTC) 2618:WikiProject Novels articles 2384:09:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC) 2369:18:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC) 2309:16:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC) 2070:01:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC) 1903:Your argument is a form of 1280:12:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 525:Military fiction task force 483:Template:WikiProject Novels 334:WikiProject Science Fiction 250:WikiProject Popular culture 2689: 2568:WikiProject Lists articles 2543:02:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC) 2481:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2417:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2212:02:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC) 2193:20:44, 3 August 2016 (UTC) 1790:06:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 1635:11:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC) 876:project's importance scale 781:project's importance scale 545:Science fiction task force 506:project's importance scale 471:general Project discussion 377:project's importance scale 326:Speculative fiction portal 201:project's importance scale 178:Template:WikiProject Lists 2638:WikiProject Film articles 2588:List-Class novel articles 2261:22:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 2232:16:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC) 2031:21:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC) 1986:11:15, 24 July 2010 (UTC) 1960:06:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC) 1775:19:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 1692:16:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 1668:15:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 1589:09:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 1564:22:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 1494:00:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 1257:22:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 1230:03:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 1010:00:40, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC) 984:00:25, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC) 869: 812: 774: 703: 667: 647:Template:WikiProject Film 584: 541: 521: 499: 418: 370: 303: 236: 194: 139: 118: 2673:Declined requested edits 2623:List-Class film articles 2558:List-Class List articles 2399:Please do not modify it. 2281:Please do not modify it. 2150:12:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 1609:04:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC) 1220:18:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 1149:22:44, 29 May 2005 (UTC) 1123:17:34, 29 May 2005 (UTC) 1102:23:53, 24 May 2005 (UTC) 1041:18:27, 13 May 2005 (UTC) 1027:10:34, 12 May 2005 (UTC) 996:20:59, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC) 357:science fiction articles 270:Popular culture articles 2413:External links modified 1437:Supreme Commander game 1420:13:28, 11 October 2006 1414:The Parting Of The Ways 1266:Niven's Bussard Ramjet? 1057:is a good name as any, 2316:List of planet killers 2200:characters from Toriko 2120: 1849:Star Wars Superweapons 1166:Base Delta Zero's link 734:WikiProject Television 664: 538: 518: 100:This article is rated 2334:needs to redirect to 2110: 1273:The Ethics of Madness 1246:Mass Shadow Generator 827:WikiProject Star Trek 749:for the type of work. 663: 537: 517: 104:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 2462:regular verification 2324:Halo (megastructure) 2175:conflict of interest 2173:by an editor with a 1165: 1083:Planetary steriliser 988:Of course, actually 978:A Fire Upon the Deep 671:War films task force 2452:After February 2018 2103:Star Trek additions 1795:Too much repitition 1182:Orbital_bombardment 1053:Personally I think 761:television articles 743:join the discussion 739:television programs 620:join the discussion 2506:InternetArchiveBot 2457:InternetArchiveBot 856:Star Trek articles 665: 539: 519: 449:WikiProject Novels 106:content assessment 2545: 2533:comment added by 2523:Stellaris sources 2482: 2371: 2349: 2306: 2181: 2180: 1950:comment added by 1878: 1665: 1643:original research 1637: 1625:comment added by 1591: 1579:comment added by 1561: 1496: 1484:comment added by 1467: 1455:comment added by 1393: 1376:comment added by 1248:that appeared in 933: 932: 912:in most browsers. 890: 889: 886: 885: 882: 881: 791: 790: 787: 786: 726:Television portal 682: 681: 678: 677: 622:and see lists of 560: 559: 556: 555: 387: 386: 383: 382: 282: 281: 278: 277: 211: 210: 207: 206: 154:WikiProject Lists 86: 85: 50: 49: 2680: 2516: 2507: 2480: 2479: 2458: 2401: 2352: 2340: 2304: 2283: 2257: 2254: 2251: 2248: 2245: 2242: 2166: 2159: 2036:Other literature 1989: 1962: 1877: 1755: 1752: 1750: 1745: 1740: 1735: 1730: 1725: 1720: 1715: 1710: 1704: 1689: 1684: 1675:Romeo and Juliet 1663: 1658: 1653: 1647: 1620: 1574: 1553: 1512: 1505: 1479: 1450: 1392: 1370: 1354:, not the Borg. 1059:Planet destroyer 970:Honor Harrington 927:Reporting errors 899: 898: 892: 858: 857: 854: 851: 848: 821: 814: 813: 808: 800: 793: 763: 762: 759: 756: 753: 747:style guidelines 728: 723: 722: 712: 705: 704: 699: 691: 684: 652: 651: 648: 645: 642: 615:WikiProject Film 609: 604: 603: 602: 593: 586: 585: 580: 569: 562: 488: 487: 484: 481: 478: 443: 438: 437: 427: 420: 419: 414: 411: 405:Military fiction 396: 389: 359: 358: 355: 352: 349: 328: 323: 322: 312: 305: 304: 299: 291: 284: 272: 271: 268: 265: 262: 245: 238: 237: 232: 220: 213: 183: 182: 179: 176: 173: 148: 141: 140: 135: 127: 120: 103: 97: 96: 95: 88: 74:. The result of 59: 52: 38:. The result of 23: 16: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2548: 2547: 2525: 2510: 2505: 2473: 2466:have permission 2456: 2430:this simple FaQ 2415: 2410: 2397: 2350: 2336:doomsday device 2279: 2269: 2255: 2252: 2249: 2246: 2243: 2240: 2220: 2157: 2128:applies here - 2105: 2077: 2058: 2038: 2019: 1995: 1979: 1968: 1945: 1942: 1871:reliable source 1851: 1828: 1805: 1797: 1754: 1751: 1749: 1746: 1741: 1739: 1736: 1731: 1729: 1726: 1721: 1719: 1716: 1711: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1687: 1682: 1664: 1659: 1654: 1649: 1617: 1559: 1532: 1523: 1508: 1501: 1476: 1443: 1426: 1410: 1371: 1367: 1312: 1268: 1237: 1213: 1211:Death Star edit 1173:Base Delta Zero 1168: 1003: 965: 956: 938: 929: 915: 914: 913: 896: 855: 852: 849: 846: 845: 806: 760: 757: 754: 751: 750: 724: 717: 697: 649: 646: 643: 640: 639: 605: 600: 598: 575: 485: 482: 479: 476: 475: 439: 432: 412: 402: 356: 353: 350: 348:Science Fiction 347: 346: 339:science fiction 324: 317: 297: 295:Science Fiction 269: 266: 263: 261:Popular culture 260: 259: 226: 224:Popular culture 180: 177: 174: 171: 170: 133: 101: 12: 11: 5: 2686: 2684: 2676: 2675: 2670: 2665: 2660: 2655: 2650: 2645: 2640: 2635: 2630: 2625: 2620: 2615: 2610: 2605: 2600: 2595: 2590: 2585: 2580: 2575: 2570: 2565: 2560: 2550: 2549: 2524: 2521: 2500: 2499: 2492: 2445: 2444: 2436:Added archive 2414: 2411: 2409: 2408: 2394:requested move 2388: 2387: 2386: 2339: 2314: 2312: 2291: 2290: 2276:requested move 2270: 2268: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2219: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2179: 2178: 2167: 2156: 2153: 2119: 2118: 2104: 2101: 2076: 2073: 2057: 2054: 2037: 2034: 2018: 2015: 2004:DustFormsWords 1994: 1991: 1984:comment added 1972:95.132.245.155 1967: 1966:Fifth element? 1964: 1941: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1900: 1899: 1883: 1882: 1850: 1847: 1827: 1824: 1804: 1801: 1796: 1793: 1747: 1737: 1727: 1717: 1707: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1648: 1627:67.174.157.126 1616: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1581:24.137.207.191 1557: 1541:as per above. 1531: 1528: 1522: 1519: 1475: 1472: 1470: 1442: 1439: 1425: 1422: 1409: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1366: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1288: 1275:for example.-- 1267: 1264: 1262: 1260: 1259: 1236: 1233: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1193: 1192: 1167: 1164: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1030: 1029: 1024:Unissakävelijä 1002: 999: 998: 997: 964: 961: 955: 952: 937: 934: 931: 930: 924: 923: 922: 910:case-sensitive 904: 903: 902: 900: 888: 887: 884: 883: 880: 879: 872:Low-importance 868: 862: 861: 859: 822: 810: 809: 807:Low‑importance 801: 789: 788: 785: 784: 777:Low-importance 773: 767: 766: 764: 730: 729: 713: 701: 700: 698:Low‑importance 692: 680: 679: 676: 675: 666: 656: 655: 653: 611: 610: 594: 582: 581: 570: 558: 557: 554: 553: 550:Low-importance 540: 530: 529: 520: 510: 509: 502:Low-importance 498: 492: 491: 489: 486:novel articles 445: 444: 428: 416: 415: 413:Low‑importance 397: 385: 384: 381: 380: 373:Mid-importance 369: 363: 362: 360: 343:the discussion 330: 329: 313: 301: 300: 298:Mid‑importance 292: 280: 279: 276: 275: 273: 246: 234: 233: 221: 209: 208: 205: 204: 197:Low-importance 193: 187: 186: 184: 149: 137: 136: 134:Low‑importance 128: 116: 115: 109: 98: 84: 83: 76:the discussion 60: 48: 47: 40:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2685: 2674: 2671: 2669: 2666: 2664: 2661: 2659: 2656: 2654: 2651: 2649: 2646: 2644: 2641: 2639: 2636: 2634: 2631: 2629: 2626: 2624: 2621: 2619: 2616: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2606: 2604: 2601: 2599: 2596: 2594: 2591: 2589: 2586: 2584: 2581: 2579: 2576: 2574: 2571: 2569: 2566: 2564: 2561: 2559: 2556: 2555: 2553: 2546: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2535:129.126.40.61 2532: 2522: 2520: 2519: 2514: 2509: 2508: 2497: 2493: 2490: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2477: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2453: 2448: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2418: 2412: 2407: 2405: 2400: 2395: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2382: 2377: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2357: 2347: 2343: 2337: 2333: 2332:planet killer 2329: 2328:planet killer 2326:. Given that 2325: 2321: 2317: 2311: 2310: 2307: 2301: 2299: 2296: 2289: 2287: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2271: 2266: 2262: 2259: 2258: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2224:89.13.139.128 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2177:was declined. 2176: 2172: 2168: 2165: 2161: 2160: 2154: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2142:Chaheel Riens 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2116: 2112: 2111: 2109: 2102: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2074: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2062:80.99.221.200 2055: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2035: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2016: 2014: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1992: 1990: 1987: 1983: 1977: 1973: 1965: 1963: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1952:99.190.57.208 1949: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1885: 1884: 1881: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1848: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1825: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1802: 1800: 1794: 1792: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1744: 1734: 1724: 1714: 1705: 1700: 1693: 1690: 1685: 1680: 1676: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1666: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1644: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1597: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1540: 1536: 1529: 1527: 1520: 1518: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1506: 1504: 1497: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1486:82.39.132.218 1483: 1473: 1471: 1468: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1449: 1441:Obliterators. 1440: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1431: 1430:82.20.221.220 1423: 1421: 1419: 1415: 1407: 1403: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1339: 1334: 1333: 1330: 1326: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1294: 1289: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1274: 1263: 1258: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1234: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1222: 1221: 1218: 1217:Darth Sidious 1210: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1170:The link for 1163: 1150: 1147: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1103: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087:Planet killer 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1063:Planet buster 1060: 1056: 1055:Planet killer 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1042: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1000: 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 983: 979: 975: 971: 962: 960: 953: 951: 950: 947: 943: 935: 928: 920: 919: 918: 911: 907: 901: 894: 893: 877: 873: 867: 864: 863: 860: 843: 839: 835: 834: 829: 828: 823: 820: 816: 815: 811: 805: 802: 799: 795: 782: 778: 772: 769: 768: 765: 748: 744: 740: 736: 735: 727: 721: 716: 714: 711: 707: 706: 702: 696: 693: 690: 686: 673: 672: 662: 658: 657: 654: 650:film articles 637: 633: 632:documentation 629: 625: 621: 617: 616: 608: 597: 595: 592: 588: 587: 583: 579: 574: 571: 568: 564: 551: 548:(assessed as 547: 546: 536: 532: 531: 527: 526: 516: 512: 511: 507: 503: 497: 494: 493: 490: 473: 472: 467: 466:short stories 463: 459: 455: 451: 450: 442: 441:Novels portal 436: 431: 429: 426: 422: 421: 417: 410: 406: 401: 398: 395: 391: 378: 374: 368: 365: 364: 361: 344: 340: 336: 335: 327: 321: 316: 314: 311: 307: 306: 302: 296: 293: 290: 286: 274: 257: 256: 251: 247: 244: 240: 239: 235: 230: 225: 222: 219: 215: 202: 198: 192: 189: 188: 185: 181:List articles 168: 164: 160: 156: 155: 150: 147: 143: 142: 138: 132: 129: 126: 122: 117: 113: 107: 99: 90: 89: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 58: 54: 53: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2529:— Preceding 2526: 2504: 2501: 2476:source check 2455: 2449: 2446: 2419: 2416: 2398: 2391: 2375: 2355: 2354: 2313: 2294: 2292: 2280: 2273: 2239: 2221: 2182: 2171:edit request 2137: 2133: 2129: 2124: 2121: 2114: 2106: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2059: 2056:Dead Space 3 2039: 2020: 1999: 1996: 1993:Cleanup tags 1969: 1943: 1926:Aladdin Sane 1921: 1917: 1913: 1908: 1852: 1831: 1829: 1806: 1798: 1778: 1753: 1742: 1732: 1722: 1712: 1701: 1698: 1674: 1660: 1655: 1650: 1618: 1552: 1547: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1524: 1509: 1502: 1498: 1477: 1469: 1447: 1444: 1436: 1427: 1418:CSkankRabbit 1411: 1378:72.66.78.220 1368: 1351: 1350:weapon from 1335: 1329:SpaceCaptain 1324: 1322: 1313: 1272: 1269: 1261: 1238: 1227:SpaceCaptain 1223: 1214: 1171: 1169: 1161: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1038:SpaceCaptain 1019: 1015: 1008:SpaceCaptain 1004: 989: 982:SpaceCaptain 977: 974:Vernor Vinge 966: 957: 939: 916: 908:Anchors are 905: 871: 838:project page 831: 825: 776: 732: 669: 613: 543: 523: 501: 469: 447: 372: 332: 253: 196: 163:project page 152: 112:WikiProjects 79: 44:no consensus 43: 2404:move review 2286:move review 2140:. Thanks 2132:edit made, 2075:Dragon Ball 1980:—Preceding 1946:—Preceding 1621:—Preceding 1575:—Preceding 1480:—Preceding 1451:—Preceding 1372:—Preceding 1001:Terminology 972:series, in 607:Film portal 2552:Categories 2513:Report bug 2356:Relisting. 2298:Cúchullain 2115:Enterprise 2090:PlissandrO 2082:Kakaroto's 2043:Akesgeroth 2000:exhaustive 1826:Hellspark? 1723:Else: If: 1615:Not Delete 1457:86.6.9.254 1352:Enterprise 1310:Borg Cube? 1095:Dead world 842:discussion 752:Television 695:Television 636:guidelines 624:open tasks 462:novelettes 167:discussion 102:List-class 68:December 9 2496:this tool 2489:this tool 1922:Star Wars 1909:Star Wars 1832:Hellspark 1782:The Phool 1277:5th earth 1178:Star Wars 847:Star Trek 833:Star Trek 804:Star Trek 32:August 28 2531:unsigned 2502:Cheers.— 2134:Reverted 2086:humanity 1948:unsigned 1905:WP:UNDUE 1623:unsigned 1601:Zaku kai 1577:unsigned 1530:Deletion 1482:unsigned 1453:unsigned 1386:contribs 1374:unsigned 1180:) is to 458:novellas 255:inactive 229:inactive 64:deletion 28:deletion 2426:my edit 2376:Support 2361:Amakuru 2342:ZXCVBNM 2204:Altamel 2155:Toriko? 2138:Discuss 2017:Riddick 1982:undated 1875:Chillum 1767:Protonk 1759:Protonk 1733:Then: 1448:Erasmus 1365:Unicron 1146:Sherool 1099:Sherool 1091:killing 1020:to kill 994:Anville 874:on the 779:on the 504:on the 375:on the 199:on the 2136:- now 2126:WP:BRD 1836:Thnidu 1813:Rursus 1743:Else: 1713:Then: 1539:Delete 1408:Daleks 1296:Thnidu 1016:planet 936:Re:afd 477:Novels 454:novels 409:Sci-fi 400:Novels 108:scale. 2295:Move. 2256:Focus 2169:This 1889:Scott 1856:Scott 1549:Ckatz 1399:Bryan 1356:Bryan 1348:Xindi 1254:SAMAS 1200:Bryan 1190:SAMAS 990:using 954:Halo? 946:Wl219 172:Lists 131:Lists 2539:talk 2381:╠╣uw 2365:talk 2346:TALK 2228:talk 2208:talk 2189:talk 2146:talk 2130:Bold 2094:talk 2066:talk 2047:talk 2027:talk 2008:talk 1976:talk 1956:talk 1930:talk 1918:this 1914:type 1893:talk 1860:talk 1840:talk 1786:talk 1771:talk 1763:talk 1703:If: 1641:Ya, 1631:talk 1605:talk 1585:talk 1503:Leth 1490:talk 1461:talk 1382:talk 1300:talk 1120:maru 1093:it. 942:here 906:Tip: 641:Film 626:and 573:Film 464:and 80:keep 78:was 72:2010 42:was 36:2007 2470:RfC 2440:to 2396:. 1978:) 1679:Kiz 1656:!= 1558:spy 1521:Wow 1510:esl 1338:Dan 1325:did 1316:Dan 1061:or 976:'s 866:Low 771:Low 578:War 496:Low 367:Mid 191:Low 66:on 30:on 2554:: 2541:) 2483:. 2478:}} 2474:{{ 2367:) 2359:— 2353:-- 2318:→ 2278:. 2230:) 2210:) 2191:) 2148:) 2096:) 2068:) 2049:) 2029:) 2010:) 1958:) 1932:) 1895:) 1862:) 1842:) 1819:) 1788:) 1773:) 1633:) 1607:) 1587:) 1546:-- 1517:) 1492:) 1463:) 1388:) 1384:• 1302:) 1081:, 1077:, 1036:-- 944:. 576:: 552:). 460:, 456:, 407:/ 403:: 70:, 34:, 2537:( 2515:) 2511:( 2498:. 2491:. 2363:( 2348:) 2344:( 2305:c 2302:/ 2253:m 2250:a 2247:e 2244:r 2241:D 2226:( 2206:( 2187:( 2144:( 2092:( 2064:( 2045:( 2025:( 2006:( 1988:. 1974:( 1954:( 1928:( 1891:( 1858:( 1838:( 1817:☻ 1815:( 1784:( 1769:( 1761:( 1688:r 1683:o 1661:2 1651:1 1629:( 1603:( 1583:( 1488:( 1459:( 1380:( 1298:( 1176:( 921:] 878:. 844:. 783:. 674:. 638:. 508:. 379:. 258:. 231:) 227:( 203:. 169:. 114:: 82:. 46:.

Index

Articles for deletion
deletion
August 28
2007
the discussion
Articles for deletion
deletion
December 9
2010
the discussion
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Lists
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Lists
list pages on Knowledge (XXG)
project page
discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Popular culture
inactive
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Popular culture
inactive
WikiProject icon
Science Fiction
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.