946:
buildings is Desert Inn. The area includes Sinful Social Club (Famous fetish parties, now closed), Sinsations Foot, Indulge, Hush (Hushh) Social Club, Body Spa, Roadhouse, Erotic Dancer Outfit World, Hot Bodies, Dead
President Tattoo, Can Can Strip Club, Deja Vu Adult Store, And above the Mini Mart covering the 2nd floor is Pornocation.com webcams (moving to new location), Mood Watchers Astrology Reading, NiteCallsOfLasVegas.com Internet Directory, Ideal Entertainment, Ecstacy Video, Taxi & Limo Magazine, Outcall Services like VIP Entertainment, Dial Entertainment, Bad Apple, Blackstar, Candy Girls, Cheaters-Club, Elite Outcall, Strippers Inc. and others that can be located at the Las Vegas city web site. The top floor was going to converted into a social club, due to parking restrictions the business never opened. The building is owned by the same group that owns Sapphire. Stardust casino was across the street and now the Trump Tower is complete. Budget Suites located across the street was owned by Mr. Bigelow and was a common place for hooking up. Since Stardust and the Budget Suites have been removed much of the foot traffic is gone. Pedicab, a trike that can carry 1 driver and 2 passengers no longer operate in the area. Most traffic is generated by Cab and Limo drivers that bring people to the swinger clubs. Some places in Las Vegas give kickbacks to drivers that bring clients. The kickbacks can be from $ 10.00 up to and over $ 200.00 (per person). Under the bridge is a new Fat Burger and much of the street will have a major update soon as the new casino that will replace the Stardust is complete. Check out google maps or google street view for the daytime picture of the area. Both buildings have security cameras & security guards 24/7, All of owners know each other and communicate well making it a very safe area for tourists. A mini Red Light District is located at 953 E. Sahara around The Green Door, Bad Lands, Hawks Gay Gym, 8 Ball Pool, Barbie Girls Outcall and a few others near the church located at the 900 block of Karen Ave. A search on KLASTV.com will show many news reports on the adult industry including Swingers, Clubs, Lap Dancing, BDSM, Fetish and much more.
924:
the time late to turn his cab in at end of shift. Cab driver pays for gas, and radio fee.... Now the reason for the details, The drivers (Smart ones) would just make a fast trip to the locations below, make a fast $ 50 or $ 100 per person in the door (Clubs give big kickbacks (not legal)). A good driver can hit the other strip clubs around the corner and say "I know a place that the girls are full service, it's less than a mile away...", If the fair did not want to pay the full door charge then a good door person would lower the entry fee and give a lower kickback to the driver. If the clients did not want to goto the Red light Club then the driver also has the option to pitch an outcall service and make $ 100 referral fee. This killed business in the brothels for a few years. No smart drivers would make the long drive with all the local options. Cab drivers are not allowed to pander or offer outcall services, Limo drivers could say anything because they lease the limo for a shift and did not have to take radio calls.
443:
me of doing so! There seem to be certain flaws in your logic here. Back to lists, you have not answered my point that a list is just that, a list. Why does every entry on a list have to be sourced? They just point to other articles. That's their sole function. If the article is not sourced, then that's a different matter. Over 50% of the list entries point to extant articles, yet you seem to be suggesting that a large number of them are original research. "Not a single one of these alleged red-light districts is sourced", you say. But the articles are, and that's what's important, not the list itself. I fail to see why you are demanding that the list itself is sourced. Again, this is illogical. Knowledge is a unified whole, not a collection of separate entities. And deleting the whole section, as you did in the source article, just because some of the list items are redlinked (and therefore unsourced) is ridiculous. What about the bluelinked items that lead to sourced articles? --
920:
with full details and directions from Las Vegas. Going back a few years and related to
Mustang Ranch, Chicken Ranch and Miss Mable's they have a 'Menu' with fixed prices. Cab Drivers/Limo Drivers would take the clients to the brothel, Clients enter a entry room that sometimes contained a bar with over priced drinks, a pool table or other attraction to occupy some time if all the brothel girls are busy. The madam of the house would then offer the menu and sales pitch that stated additional rules, prices or 2 for 1 specials. The client sits on a couch and all the girls come out like a Macy's day parade. Client picks who he wants and goes to that girls room. Each girl has condoms and lube personally stocked and used as a way to gain more tips or kill time. On the menu were fixed items with time limits. Most menu items were in the 400 to 700 range, I do recall a $ 100 HAND offering as the lowest price (I'm sure a menu is online someplace).
928:
anti-prostitution laws varies by country or place)." So..... find any information like I have added here would be rare I'm sure. Verified, I would think that Wiki is interested in
Original content that is related to the main topic. Wiki will be around forever where all google searches give different results and like said before sites come and go. Maybe a timeline would be best, in NY for example, the girls would float from area to area to avoid getting caught so a map/tracking system might be best (Independents post on Craigslist till a year ago when police started to setup stings).
512:
technically available or not. It is also normal to tag an article asking for sources, not to just cut a large chunk of text or tag an article for deletion when it does not meet the criteria for that tag (in fact, the policy you quote says as much). It's all about good manners and not deleting other people's work unless it's blatantly unencyclopaedic or rubbish. I happen to feel much more strongly about that than I do about sourcing every little piece of information, particularly when much of that information can be readily confirmed with a brief internet search. --
1171:, a citation is needed for any material challenged or likely to be challenged. There are many well known red-light districts that are not listed simply because some editors have prosecuted a campaign of removing unsourced entries without regard to likelihood of challenge. It's not correct to remove any and all unsourced entries. I'm not saying that any random street should be added, but areas that are well known as present or historic areas of prostitution should be on this list and do not require citations per wikipedia policy. For example,
194:
167:
204:
932:
would be best for Wiki over all and someone hit on the point that
Information is posted but the posted may not know how to add or the format/location. Above I crossed over Drivers, Brothels, Escorts, Swinger Clubs and Strip Clubs. I could post about the crews that pass out cards on the strip and also about the racks on the street including the content of the magazines, cost, who owns most of them and how they are stocked. Any advise or links to where I can learn how to format the content would be a great help.
364:
put it there get this information? People who live there or own property on this street probably do not appreciate this unsubstantiated claim. There is absolutely nothing preventing goofballs from adding any kind of false junk information to this article. Some of these entries seem to be original research from people who thought to themselves, "hey, I saw a girl who looked like a hooker on such-and-such street, I think I'll add it to
Knowledge".
270:
99:
81:
308:
50:
21:
320:
2185:
562:, they should all be in the individual articles. If you cant seem to find a citation, then bring your camera next time. Just because a citation is missing is no reason to delete an well developed article; I really dont know what you people seem to expect, most red light districts dont have websites that can be sourced. --
698:
wanted them. Every major town may have places used by prostitutes, but that's not the same thing as a well-established red-light district (which is usually mentioned, if it exists or existed, even in ordinary travel guides). If you can't write an article about it then it probably shouldn't be listed here. --
1968:. There can be no objection to deleting any entries without citation or not blue-linked to an article with citations. I think there's a lot of BS here. I'm not going to do mass deletions but I am going to delete one red-linked item without citation that I personally know to be BS (Commercial Rd, London, UK)
1588:
Opinion: As I look at this article and read the old discussion above on maintainability it seems to me that the issue needs to be resolved. That is, the list is not "complete" by any definition and it does not appear that it is really headed toward being "complete." I would say that one of two things
1380:
Most of the lists with strict inclusion criteria involve very controvercial topics... where a less strict inclusion criteria resulted in heated POV debate and edit warring. Others are lists where inclusion could be potentially harmful to those listed. These all fit a pattern. So the question is...
923:
Note: The Cab/Limo Driver will be paid 20% to 35% of all money collected inside not including the drink sales. The drive from Vegas up north to the brothels is about 90 minutes each way. Take 3 clients and maybe the driver gets $ 100 per fair, (avg $ 300-$ 400) per trip, 1/2 the cab fair, and most of
919:
100% agree on the areas north of Las Vegas, I would think anyone that looks at Red Light
District or is going to travel to an area would like that information. Sherries Ranch was remodeled around 2002-2005. The new owner or co-owner was a sheriff of something of the like, 99% sure they have a website
530:
Neither is it about yours. Knowledge policy does not support your opinion, although you appear to think it does. It merely says articles should be sourced. Articles which are sourced elsewhere on
Knowledge are still sourced. I despair of people who favour deletion over addition of content and seem to
374:
Do a Google search. And please give details. Which entries "seem to be original research from people who thought to themselves, "hey, I saw a girl who looked like a hooker on such-and-such street, I think I'll add it to
Knowledge""? What is your basis for these assertions? Many of these (probably the
1512:
What else is there to call it? You've repeatedly made bad faith edits, you've ignored wikipedia guidelines, you've removed sourced information, you've refused to participate in discussion and ignored consensus. You asked an impartial admin to weigh in, which was a great idea, but since then you've
1392:
With this in mind, I think tagging (with eventual removal possible after everyone has been given a reasonable time to look for sources) is a far better standard than removal for this article. However, I also think that if someone can express a specific reason that a specific entry should be removed
511:
I stick to my opinion about lists and the articles they link to - if the source is in the article then that information is already sourced on
Knowledge and does not require another reference. And I don't think your point about nothing being lost is really relevant; it has still been removed, whether
442:
I didn't say you did place the original tag, but you did restore it after I had deleted it legitimately, accusing me of removing it improperly. You therefore presumably want the article deleted, or you would not have done so, thereby contravening policy yourself and yet having the audacity to accuse
393:
It's a list. Its purpose is merely to link to other articles. Many of the links already lead to articles. It is there that the sourcing should be done. There are 138 districts listed; of these, 70 are blue links. It should be the articles you're aiming your displeasure at if they're not sourced, not
363:
Not a single one of these alleged red-light districts is sourced. It is original research for an article to declare that Van Buren Street in
Pheonix, Arizona is a place of prostitution, without any proof to back up this wild claim. The Van Buren street entry is redlinked, so where did the person who
1325:
Mind you, those numbers are arbitrary and I am not suggesting that sources must be provided giving exact counts. Only that a good faith effort be made to determine if the district likely meets the criteria (e.g. obviously two small huts do not meet the criteria whereas a government edict covering 4
935:
I would like to see mass content and possible related topics in the main topic. I do understand verification but I would put that on a sliding scale depending on how easy the information is to locate/depending on subject. Thank you in advance for your comments and suggestions, edit what you want of
1458:
material. It is not a burden on the challenger to "prove a negative". True common knowledge is extremely easy to source—if you challenged that the Earth is round or that it is the third planet in orbit around the Sun, I could provide you a dozen reliable sources for that with little effort. If the
1242:
It seems like you are missing the point of what I'm saying. Continuing with the Storyville example, its notability is based entirely on its history as a redlight district. It's common knowledge, which according to WP:V does not need to be cited. Maybe the average person might not know this, but
659:
Of course, it's never likely to be complete, that's not my argument. My argument is that there are so many of them that the list is unmaintainable, particularly when you factor in the many defunct ones which would presumably include places like Pompeii and Ephesus. It could run into thousands, and
1513:
ignored their opinion and continued your campaign of removing information from this page without cause. And now you're being uncivil. If you're not going to make a constructive contribution, I suggest you leave this page to editors who interested in building a consensus and improving wikipedia.
945:
Las Vegas, Nevada. Building located at 3135 Industrial Road. Business named "The Red Light District" Information provided to tourists and cab drivers to promote the entire area from Sapphire (the worlds largest Strip Club) to Deja Vu a strip club in the next building south. Bridge located between
697:
Well, obviously only well-established and well-known areas should be included, not streets used by prostitutes for a few months. This is supposed to be a guide for interest and research, not a travel guide for sex tourists! There are plenty of websites where people could find those if they really
931:
I am a member of the "c64 (Commodore) Warez Scene" and they have the same problem when logging all the groups of people. Everyone has a different view or experience even when they visit the same club on the same day, depends on what your looking for. I would think Content and related information
477:
I really do not see the need to source items on a list, particularly if they are sourced in the detailed articles. However, I have no objection to people doing it if they so desire. What I do object to is the arrogant deletion of other people's work as has been done by Wikipediatrix to this list
1898:
Haven't made massive changes. Just deleted the entries without proper citation. I believe such entries are what you call "potentially harmful to the project". Seeing that you revoked all necessary changes affirms my opinion that your acting is a clear case of double standards. Otherwise I could
1821:
That might be better but I don't think wikipedia or any encyclopedia works like this. Given information needs a valid source. If this doesn't exist adding a banner which tells to add citation is not of much use since you might provide false information. in germany you would call it doppelmoral.
1600:
It seems that if the scope is constrained sufficiently it should not be hard to complete the list. But at this point the list is more a random list of items that people have inserted as they feel like it. This is not encyclopedic. The fact that any individual item in the list is referenced and
927:
Now reading your lines above, I agree you want verified sources but note that your first line of the Red Light District says something to the effect "In red light districts where prostitution is illegal prostitutes or clients may be arrested or fined if caught by the police (the enforcement of
587:
Had another incidence of someone removing "unsourced" links. I understand the desire for references, but I still think it's misguided. For most of these places they are well known to be red light districts, and if you follow the link to the main article it's usually right there in the first
1899:
publish an article without any citations with maybe lots of false information (like the manchester part in this article) waiting for somebody to find proper ressources to backup what's written. I guess you made your own directives which you follow but don't call it the proper wikipedia way.
607:
says it's a red light district. It's in Category:Red-light districts. But we can't list it here without a cite? What kind of cite do you want? A sworn statement by the mayor of Hamburg saying yes, there are prostitutes on the Reeperbahn? I thought wikipedia was about providing factual
496:
Information on Knowledge must be reliable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and
1544:
Pardon the name change. I don't see any point in continuing discussion when you're being so disingenuous. The edit history and this talk page confirm everything I've said. If you want to contribute constructively, that would be great, but if not, please stop disrupting wikipedia.
428:
Firstly, I did not place the tag originally, someone else did. Secondly, nominating the article for AfD is not the proper action to take when one wants an article to be properly sourced. And yes, lists do have to be sourced, especially with controversial subjects such as this. See
1388:
on a strict standard of "citation at the time of inclusion". I don't think the article is going to erupt into edit wars and POV debates over whether a given street or area is included. I also don't think being included in this list will harm the district or those living in
1175:
is not on this list, even though its status as a historical red-light district is not in doubt and has never been questioned. If you feel than an entry needs a citation, tag it, or better yet, research it and add one. Removing entries should be avoided unless justified.
936:
my information given to best suit the global topic. After reading everyones input on red line subjects and insert/delete comments that this is the best place for me to learn your system and also offer content/information that you would not find anyplace else on the net.
1344:
I went ahead and restored several that had been improperly removed. I also added a few notable omissions. If any editor thinks citations are needed, indicate so by using a fact tag. Simply removing entries without discussion will be taken as a bad-faith edit.
2901:
I have removed the statement that Cheonho-dong has one of the largest red-light districts in Seoul and its associated source. The source in question (rocketreports.com) cannot in any way be considered reliable, as it is an anonymous blog loaded with sex ads.
1419:
tends not to be as broad as often thought. Consider whether the knowledge is common to editors and readers on the other side of the planet or from different cultural backgrounds. That said, Blueboar is right that tagging is a more collaborative approach.
1765:
Allright Kuguar. Together we can wok on this article. I am busy deleting all entries without citation to not harm the project. I guess we should check all given citations since they are not really valid ressource if I understood you right.
411:
you love to quote, which quite clearly state "If anyone, including the article's creator, removes Template:Prod from an article for any reason, do not put it back"! Seems quite clear to me. If you want to propose it for deletion under
1863:
pages and do some simple edits first. Making massive changes to articles without discussion is general not a good idea. This article in particular involves some complex issues and has been the subject of much discussion (see above).
31:
688:(lots of unintentional innuendo here!) It would be too long, and has two problems in, a) its vastness, and b) the speed with which these areas come and go. In Edinburgh, they often appear and disappear in a matter of months.--
2569:
1527:
I haven't removed sourced information and I did responded in this discussion. Consensus here is not that clear. But I will see if the fact tags ever gets cited, but I don't have high hopes on it. I suggest you read
635:
However, I think it is unmaintable. Almost every city of a few hundred thousand, and usually not under a particularly despotic regime has one. There must be hundreds and hundreds of such places around the world.
1659:
1707:
This list of red light districts on wikipedia is not even close to "all known urban red light districts". The mapping project clearly states that it is work in progress searching for input on various channels.
1207:
I suggested that, as you'd see if you read my comment. And if you feel strongly about any claim, you should be adding fact tags rather than simply reverting any unsourced addition. Though I feel like you're
1485:'s vandalism and added fact tags on unsourced entries. This makes it easier for editors wishing to collaborate on this article to easily see where refs are missing and add them in. Thanks to all who help!
1372:
that an entry is added (indeed in one case we require multiple sources). I have also been involved in list articles that are amazingly lax in their citation standards. The difference is in understanding
416:
then do so, but don't try deletion by underhand methods. Since the deletion was clearly not uncontroversial, this tag should never have been inserted in the first place. Again, according to the rules. --
279:
177:
2499:
Made the references section scrollable (I did think of having it hidden with a 'show' button, but if you click on a ref in the text the page scrolls down to the references sction but doesn't open it).
1662:
and then objected to it's removal on the grounds that it's "a project ... which tries to map all known urban red light districts". Be that as it may, it doesn't really belong here for a few reasons:
723:
perhaps there should be another list for streets used for hooking and this one should be strictly for well known red light districts, either way i think all of the information is worth keeping. --
1314:(with some flexibility; historically some cities have outlawed prostitution while they set up vice districts under other names with the specific intention of keeping prostitution contained there)
1601:
notable does not make the whole list notable. It is only notable if it is complete according to some definition (and that definition should ideally be notable to some degree or another).
2570:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130616025853/http://www.asafeworldforwomen.org/womens-rights/wr-asia-pacific/south-korea/2071-business-booms-for-illegal-brothels-on-south-korea-border.html
2961:
260:
250:
1737:
Unfortunately that's not the way wikipedia works. When and if this becomes published research, there may be a way to incorporate it, but as it stands it's inappropriate to include.
1277:
2573:
1459:
knowledge is really so common, find these sources and add them. If you can't, maybe the knowledge isn't quite so common as you thought. We write from sources, not from editors'
394:
the list. As I've said before, you'll find most lists on Knowledge aren't sourced, since it's difficult to source every entry on a list. Yet you're aiming at this one only. Why?
2976:
1943:
It is interesting that the self-appointed guardians of wikipedia policies are talking about posible harms but are not interested at all to keep articles at least truthfully.
2956:
1255:
467:
for example. Anyway, each page has to stand on its own. Every entry in the list needs to include a citation to a reliable source that refers to it as a red-light district.
2273:
2781:
226:
521:
Knowledge policy is not about your opinion. I am removing all redlinked entries for now and may remove many more later. Feel free to take this to an RFC if you wish.
1364:... I have been involved in several list articles... including some that adhere to very strict citation standards ... where there is a firm consensus that a source
2150:
1212:
by applying such a strict definition of WP:V to this article. There are plenty of list articles where there is no expectation to provide a cite for every entry.
2843:
2839:
2825:
2655:
2651:
2637:
2425:
2421:
2407:
2315:
2311:
2297:
2062:
2058:
2044:
384:
Dude. NONE OF THESE ENTRIES HAVE SOURCES, so why are you even arguing with me? You should have no problem getting some sources if they're as famous as you claim.
905:
There really should be an entry on Nevada, which has legal brothels scattered around most counties except Clark County (Las Vegas) and Washoe County (Reno).
217:
172:
2486:
Although we could split Europe off into it's own article, there's not enough content in the other continent sections to warrant separate articles for each.
1280:. Not official policy or anything, but some useful advice that may help you understand why it's not necessary to cite every single entry on this list.
1254:, but people familiar with the region would, and it would be unreasonable to have this fact cited at every reference. And in fact, it is not cited in
433:
for example. Just because there are lots of lists are aren't sourced doesn't mean they're not supposed to be. Give me time and I'll work on those too.
2971:
2946:
2791:
340:
284:
143:
1678:
It's not even close to "all known urban red light districts", at present it's limited in scope to France, the UK, and some scattered parts of Europe
2574:
http://www.asafeworldforwomen.org/womens-rights/wr-asia-pacific/south-korea/2071-business-booms-for-illegal-brothels-on-south-korea-border.html
149:
2613:
2589:
375:
majority) are famous red-light districts and are listed as such in numerous perfectly respectable guidebooks (usually as places to avoid). --
2966:
2527:
Resolved problem of images on right on small screen - Images need to be at start of section. Moved images from gallery to right hand side --
1950:
1640:
2811:
2801:
2757:
1593:
Define a scope for the list and get a list of all districts that meet the criteria (removing anything that doesn't meet the criteria), or
2951:
2903:
2274:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110924152138/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002815117_amsterdam19.html?syndication=rss
1625:
731:
570:
2283:
2782:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070521181910/http://www.wolverhampton.gov.uk/policing_safety/crime_law/street_sex_trade/regenerating.htm
2022:
1900:
2941:
2821:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2633:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2403:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2293:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1829:
1795:
The better thing to do would be to add citations if you can find them. The article's already tagged as needing improved references.
1773:
1717:
501:
There is not an exception for lists. Remember, nothing is ever lost; it's all avaliable as an older version in the edit history.
119:
2747:
2277:
2151:
http://web.archive.org/web/20110724094357/http://v.tgdn.net/2009/09/guest-post-anne-gray-fischer-history-of-the-combat-zone.html
413:
2785:
2775:
1320:
Very large unofficial districts that have a history at least — say — 30 years, and have housed at least — say — 100 workers.
1860:
2154:
551:
You've left some redlinked entries in the list, why is that? Either remove them all or restore them all. Or find sources.
2886:
2698:
2468:
2358:
1559:
61:
2717:
2553:
2377:
2239:
2122:
1994:
1227:
1209:
953:
784:
430:
408:
115:
111:
106:
86:
1618:
I agree. Either define a scope or delete the article. To say that this list is unencyclopedic is an understatement.
478:(twice) in its previous incarnation and proposed by her and another editor (against policy) in this incarnation. --
2792:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071011172953/http://scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/lg/or-04/lg04-1502.htm
1421:
1416:
2623:
764:
761:
27:
2842:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2654:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2424:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2314:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2061:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1305:
It may be helpful to establish a more specific scope for this article. For example, one could limit the list to
2795:
1644:
2496:
Moved images into galleries (2 columns plus an image on the right can give strabge effects on a small screen).
2267:
2261:
1954:
1467:
here to be the first to publish something, we're here to summarize and collect information already published.
2513:
Changed method of scrolling TOC, previous template didn't hide on mobile and was superimposed over content --
2393:
1629:
2907:
2877:
2725:
2689:
2561:
2459:
2385:
2349:
2247:
1904:
1192:
1168:
724:
563:
489:
2614:
https://web.archive.org/web/20061221070439/http://mc2.vicnet.net.au/home/catwaust/web/myfiles/substreet.htm
2590:
https://web.archive.org/web/20171105170332/http://gothamist.com/2017/09/08/1970s_times_square_the_deuce.php
1258:. Your application of a different standard of verifiability to this article is clearly gaming the system.
2721:
2557:
2255:
1273:
1153:
1113:
1092:
1054:
1032:
996:
988:
910:
891:
866:
831:
803:
531:
enjoy such deletion, but I frankly have more interesting things to do than continue to argue with you. --
209:
1710:
The mapping is taking place within a research project. Research is the basis of all wikipedia articles.
2861:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2849:
2673:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2661:
2443:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2431:
2333:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2321:
2217:
2197:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2100:
2080:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2068:
1833:
1777:
1721:
1439:
1428:
67:
2812:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150203225355/http://www.centercityphila.org/life/nhood_northliberties.php
2802:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100720115332/http://nsrc.sfsu.edu/article/lessons_learned_mexican_brothel
2724:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2560:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2384:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2246:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1243:
anyone familiar with the history of New Orleans, or even US history in general, would have heard of it.
2758:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080513102638/http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/demand_for_victims.pdf
2579:
1191:
Or even better, let the editor who adds an entry to the article provide sources. Which is exactly per
2175:
1946:
1825:
1769:
1713:
1621:
949:
780:
772:
613:
593:
2284:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110604091919/http://libraries.uta.edu/SpecColl/crose07/CR-Fall2007.pdf
203:
193:
166:
20:
2922:
2617:
2593:
2532:
2518:
2023:
https://web.archive.org/20060104041530/http://japaninc.com:80/article.php?articleID=1285&page=4
1529:
1518:
1490:
1350:
1285:
1263:
1217:
1181:
839:
225:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2769:
2735:
2601:
1933:
1925:
1869:
1800:
1742:
1687:
1672:
It's a personal project unrelated to wikipedia, so using wikipedia to promote it is inappropriate
1609:
1566:
1550:
1536:
1504:
1468:
1402:
1334:
1234:
1199:
1042:
1016:
541:
522:
434:
385:
365:
348:
324:
311:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
2846:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2658:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2428:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2318:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2065:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2026:
1675:
It contains uncited info, so associating it with wikipedia is potentially harmful to the project
776:
2862:
2815:
2805:
2674:
2607:
2444:
2334:
2198:
2081:
2761:
2132:
2004:
1973:
1149:
1109:
1088:
1050:
1028:
992:
984:
906:
887:
862:
827:
799:
502:
468:
2748:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090111060754/http://www16.ocn.ne.jp/~sumiyaho/page/english.html
2278:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002815117_amsterdam19.html?syndication=rss
588:
sentence. The desire to remove these entries is, I suspect, part of some righteous crusade.
2287:
2213:
2096:
1435:
1412:
1394:
1361:
879:
2869:
2786:
http://www.wolverhampton.gov.uk/policing_safety/crime_law/street_sex_trade/regenerating.htm
2776:
http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Mapperley-Park-Arboretum/story-12867852-detail/story.html
2681:
2451:
2341:
2205:
2088:
1639:
It seems pretty well defined to me. Can you explain what you find unencyclopedic about it?
2140:
2012:
1924:
Undid the massive deletion of content as there is specific Knowledge policy for this: see
957:
699:
689:
670:
661:
647:
637:
609:
589:
532:
513:
479:
444:
418:
376:
222:
1308:
Districts established by government designation (which house at least — say — 60 workers)
2926:
2911:
2891:
2703:
2536:
2522:
2473:
2363:
2225:
2108:
1977:
1958:
1937:
1908:
1873:
1837:
1804:
1781:
1746:
1725:
1691:
1648:
1633:
1613:
1569:
1554:
1539:
1522:
1507:
1494:
1473:
1445:
1406:
1354:
1338:
1289:
1267:
1237:
1221:
1202:
1185:
1157:
1117:
1096:
1058:
1036:
1000:
961:
914:
895:
874:
807:
743:
702:
692:
673:
664:
650:
640:
617:
597:
582:
544:
535:
525:
516:
505:
482:
471:
447:
437:
421:
388:
379:
368:
352:
2918:
2828:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2741:
2640:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2528:
2514:
2410:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2300:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2047:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1514:
1486:
1346:
1281:
1259:
1213:
1177:
2868:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2680:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2450:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2340:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2204:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2155:
http://v.tgdn.net/2009/09/guest-post-anne-gray-fischer-history-of-the-combat-zone.html
2087:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1682:
I'm sure there's other reasons, but that's all I can think of off the top of my head.
792:
Whoever maintains this page might want to make a habit of lurking the World Sex Guide
2935:
2751:
1929:
1865:
1796:
1738:
1683:
1667:
1605:
1563:
1546:
1533:
1501:
1482:
1464:
1398:
1330:
1231:
1196:
1024:
972:
540:
I repeat, take it to an RFC and see how far you get with it if you don't believe me.
344:
332:
608:
information, not obscuring the facts because it offends some people's sensibilities.
1969:
1965:
1460:
1384:
Yes, we do want these entries to be properly cited ... but I don't see a reason to
1020:
968:
835:
758:
2835:
2647:
2417:
2307:
2054:
1451:
1137:
1105:
1080:
1046:
980:
870:
851:
629:
307:
869:) 16:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC) Tijuana's Zona Norte is even listed in your page on
2834:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2646:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2624:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060703174315/http://www.nzpc.org.nz/lawrefor.htm
2416:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2306:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2053:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1454:
policy is very clear: The burden of sourcing lies on the editor who wishes to
1172:
1101:
976:
859:
604:
328:
269:
199:
1859:
Knowledge is an ongoing, collaborative project. You should probably read the
1195:. If Storyville is so well known it should be very easy to provide a source.
646:
It's never likely to be complete, but that's not a reason not to have it. --
2796:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/lg/or-04/lg04-1502.htm
1704:
Linking to a map which visualizes the given information is additional value.
1133:
855:
98:
80:
2268:
http://www.advocacynet.org/cpage_view/startingsmall_05education_19_105.html
2262:
http://www.advocacynet.org/cpage_view/startingsmall_05education_19_105.html
2394:
https://web.archive.org/web/20091026025023/http://www.sleazoidexpress.com/
407:
Oh, and before you accuse me of improperly removing tags, try reading the
1076:
843:
795:
464:
2137:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
2009:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
2256:
http://www.cms-uk.org/settingcaptivesfree/downloads/02_SCF_Children.pdf
1247:
1141:
1084:
883:
823:
736:
575:
2627:
2192:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
1393:(other than "it needs a source") they should be allowed to do so per
1251:
1145:
2580:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090408044027/http://en.reeperbahn.se/
2397:
2145:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
2017:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
757:
tried to fix the inter-linkage patterns for the following pages:
2618:
http://mc2.vicnet.net.au/home/catwaust/web/myfiles/substreet.htm
2594:
http://gothamist.com/2017/09/08/1970s_times_square_the_deuce.php
983:
at 245 Allens Ave. in Providence to see how this works indoors.
847:
669:
Why would it be unusable? It's structured, ergo it's usable. --
1246:
Here's another example: the average person might not know that
971:
is perfectly legal so long as it's conducted entirely indoors.
2489:
In an attempt to shorten the page I've changed it as follows:
43:
15:
2027:
http://www.japaninc.com/article.php?articleID=1285&page=4
1424:
provides a selection of useful tags for the purpose, such as
798:
which can offer some decent take-it-or-leave-it information.
2816:
http://www.centercityphila.org/life/nhood_northliberties.php
2806:
http://nsrc.sfsu.edu/article/lessons_learned_mexican_brothel
2608:
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_333633.html
2506:
Having done all that, I'm not sure the layout looks right.
2160:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
2032:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1500:
You really honour your username if you call that vandalism.
1381:
does this list fit the same pattern? I am not sure it does.
268:
2762:
http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/demand_for_victims.pdf
2583:
886:, TX, certainly has its share of openly operated brothels.
603:
This is crazy. The first line of the wikipedia article on
2728:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2564:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2388:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2250:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1697:
Not quite sure how to respond in the proper wikipedia way:
1434:
that can be used with the "date" parameter to good effect.
1079:: five stories, bright pink, four bars, and most of their
118:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
2288:
http://libraries.uta.edu/SpecColl/crose07/CR-Fall2007.pdf
2121:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1993:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1326:
city blocks and a dozen brothels almost certainly does).
2381:
2243:
2126:
1998:
1377:
uncited entries should be removed as opposed to tagged.
822:
How can a list of red light districts in Mexico omit
302:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
2742:
http://homepage3.nifty.com/northfestival/profile.htm
221:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2838:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2650:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2420:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2310:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2057:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1256:
List of capitals in East, South, and Southeast Asia
2752:http://www16.ocn.ne.jp/~sumiyaho/page/english.html
148:This article has not yet received a rating on the
979:are illegal, but you only need to visit Cheaters
2897:Removed three listings from Seoul, South Korea.
2962:Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
2824:This message was posted before February 2018.
2636:This message was posted before February 2018.
2406:This message was posted before February 2018.
2296:This message was posted before February 2018.
2043:This message was posted before February 2018.
1278:WP:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue
463:The articles, in many cases, are not sourced,
8:
769:I hope it makes sense to everyone. –M.J.H.
235:Knowledge:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
2977:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
1015:I thought it was common knowledge that the
854:(where customers are allowed to fondle the
238:Template:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
110:, an attempt to structure and organize all
2957:List-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
2376:I have just modified one external link on
628:I found this article because it linked to
161:
75:
49:
47:
2716:I have just modified 6 external links on
2552:I have just modified 5 external links on
2238:I have just modified 5 external links on
1964:This article seems to be an exception to
341:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
1822:especially you should understand this.
1481:Good discussion. I once again reverted
1360:Commenting due to a request to do so at
1136:advertise that they include one or more
1132:Operators of international sex tours to
114:. If you wish to help, please visit the
339:Above undated message substituted from
163:
77:
2709:External links modified (January 2018)
2493:Made larger sections into two columns.
1073:Most recommended is the Hotel Del Rey
2172:to let others know (documentation at
7:
2483:The page is getting extremely long.
846:, and sexually available females in
660:thus be so long as to be unusable --
359:get some proof for these allegations
215:This article is within the scope of
104:This article is within the scope of
2628:http://www.nzpc.org.nz/lawrefor.htm
1230:then this discussion is pointless.
560:No citations should be on this page
66:It is of interest to the following
30:on 15 February 2020. The result of
1758:Missing citations aka. Doppelmoral
1226:If asking for citations to you is
1019:had a very casual attitude toward
316:
312:
218:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
14:
2720:. Please take a moment to review
2556:. Please take a moment to review
2380:. Please take a moment to review
2242:. Please take a moment to review
2125:. Please take a moment to review
1997:. Please take a moment to review
1562:is another helpful page for you.
2972:Low-importance Sex work articles
2947:Unknown-importance List articles
2183:
319:. Further details are available
306:
202:
192:
165:
97:
79:
48:
19:
2398:http://www.sleazoidexpress.com/
2266:Corrected formatting/usage for
2260:Corrected formatting/usage for
2254:Corrected formatting/usage for
1654:Removing random Google map link
1411:Also commenting per request at
1104:is even listed in your page on
1045:is even listed in your page on
787:) 20:03, August 23, 2007 (UTC).
255:This article has been rated as
241:Sexology and sexuality articles
26:This article was nominated for
2474:12:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
1:
1614:16:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
1570:11:52, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
1555:04:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
1540:22:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
1523:22:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
1508:11:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
1495:10:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
1474:18:14, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
1461:personal knowledge or beliefs
1446:16:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
1407:20:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
1355:02:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
1339:19:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
1290:20:39, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
1268:20:07, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
1238:19:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
1222:19:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
1203:19:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
1186:19:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
703:18:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
693:15:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
277:This article is supported by
229:and see a list of open tasks.
2967:List-Class Sex work articles
2927:08:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
2912:00:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
2892:15:18, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
2537:22:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
2523:22:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
2109:21:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
1978:19:30, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
1959:11:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
1938:17:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
1909:13:19, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
1874:23:08, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
1838:23:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
1805:22:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
1782:22:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
1747:22:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
1726:22:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
1692:22:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
1560:Knowledge:Disruptive editing
744:02:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
674:17:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
665:15:56, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
651:23:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
641:20:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
583:00:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
353:02:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
2917:Reinstated with new refs --
2718:List of red-light districts
2704:00:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
2554:List of red-light districts
2378:List of red-light districts
2240:List of red-light districts
2123:List of red-light districts
1995:List of red-light districts
1532:though, it might help you.
991:) 17:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
834:) 17:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
431:List of HIV-positive people
128:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
2993:
2952:WikiProject Lists articles
2855:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2713:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2667:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2549:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2437:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2373:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2327:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2235:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2226:11:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
2143:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
2118:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2074:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2015:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1990:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1422:Category:Dispute templates
261:project's importance scale
150:project's importance scale
131:Template:WikiProject Lists
1649:04:41, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
1634:14:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
962:10:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
882:, across the border from
618:22:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
598:14:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
545:18:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
536:17:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
526:15:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
517:23:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
506:23:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
483:22:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
472:21:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
448:20:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
438:19:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
422:16:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
389:16:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
380:15:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
369:15:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
276:
254:
187:
147:
92:
74:
2942:List-Class List articles
2584:http://en.reeperbahn.se/
2502:Made the TOC scrollable.
2364:02:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
1158:18:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1118:19:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1097:18:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1059:19:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1037:18:59, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1001:17:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
915:17:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
896:18:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
875:19:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
858:) is legal in Tijuana's
808:17:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
765:Boy's Town, prostitution
762:Boy's Town, Nuevo Laredo
2545:External links modified
2369:External links modified
2231:External links modified
2114:External links modified
1986:External links modified
1272:You might want to read
1027:and the beach resorts.
490:Knowledge:Verifiability
280:the Sex work task force
112:list pages on Knowledge
2509:Anybody any thoughts?
1163:Citations on this page
273:
232:Sexology and sexuality
210:Human sexuality portal
173:Sexology and sexuality
56:This article is rated
775:comment was added by
323:. Student editor(s):
272:
2836:regular verification
2648:regular verification
2418:regular verification
2308:regular verification
2129:. If necessary, add
2055:regular verification
2040:to let others know.
2001:. If necessary, add
1023:, especially around
2826:After February 2018
2638:After February 2018
2408:After February 2018
2298:After February 2018
2164:parameter below to
2045:After February 2018
2036:parameter below to
1658:An IP editor added
1596:Delete the article.
1530:Knowledge:Vandalism
1417:WP:Common knowledge
1415:. What constitutes
840:street prostitution
2880:InternetArchiveBot
2831:InternetArchiveBot
2692:InternetArchiveBot
2643:InternetArchiveBot
2462:InternetArchiveBot
2413:InternetArchiveBot
2352:InternetArchiveBot
2303:InternetArchiveBot
2050:InternetArchiveBot
1250:is the capital of
1043:Dominican Republic
1017:Dominican Republic
1011:Dominican Republic
952:comments added by
327:. Peer reviewers:
321:on the course page
274:
62:content assessment
2856:
2668:
2438:
2328:
2224:
2107:
2075:
1949:comment added by
1828:comment added by
1772:comment added by
1716:comment added by
1624:comment added by
1589:needs to happen:
1472:
1444:
1315:
1228:gaming the system
1210:gaming the system
1138:female companions
967:In Rhode Island,
788:
632:which I created.
299:
298:
295:
294:
291:
290:
160:
159:
156:
155:
107:WikiProject Lists
42:
41:
2984:
2890:
2881:
2854:
2853:
2832:
2773:
2739:
2702:
2693:
2666:
2665:
2644:
2605:
2472:
2463:
2436:
2435:
2414:
2362:
2353:
2326:
2325:
2304:
2220:
2219:Talk to my owner
2215:
2190:
2187:
2186:
2179:
2144:
2136:
2103:
2102:Talk to my owner
2098:
2073:
2072:
2051:
2016:
2008:
1961:
1840:
1784:
1728:
1636:
1471:
1442:
1438:
1433:
1427:
1313:
1193:WP:Verifiability
1169:WP:Verifiability
964:
770:
741:
734:
729:
580:
573:
568:
355:
318:
314:
310:
243:
242:
239:
236:
233:
212:
207:
206:
196:
189:
188:
183:
180:
169:
162:
136:
135:
132:
129:
126:
101:
94:
93:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
51:
44:
23:
16:
2992:
2991:
2987:
2986:
2985:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2932:
2931:
2899:
2884:
2879:
2847:
2840:have permission
2830:
2767:
2733:
2726:this simple FaQ
2711:
2696:
2691:
2659:
2652:have permission
2642:
2599:
2562:this simple FaQ
2547:
2481:
2466:
2461:
2429:
2422:have permission
2412:
2386:this simple FaQ
2371:
2356:
2351:
2319:
2312:have permission
2302:
2248:this simple FaQ
2233:
2223:
2218:
2188:
2184:
2173:
2138:
2130:
2116:
2106:
2101:
2066:
2059:have permission
2049:
2010:
2002:
1988:
1944:
1823:
1767:
1760:
1711:
1668:not a guidebook
1656:
1619:
1586:
1440:
1431:
1425:
1274:WP:When to cite
1165:
1130:
1125:
1071:
1066:
1064:Central America
1013:
1008:
947:
903:
820:
815:
771:—The preceding
737:
732:
725:
626:
576:
571:
564:
361:
338:
313:12 January 2021
304:
240:
237:
234:
231:
230:
223:human sexuality
208:
201:
181:
175:
133:
130:
127:
124:
123:
60:on Knowledge's
57:
12:
11:
5:
2990:
2988:
2980:
2979:
2974:
2969:
2964:
2959:
2954:
2949:
2944:
2934:
2933:
2930:
2929:
2898:
2895:
2874:
2873:
2866:
2819:
2818:
2810:Added archive
2808:
2800:Added archive
2798:
2790:Added archive
2788:
2780:Added archive
2778:
2764:
2756:Added archive
2754:
2746:Added archive
2744:
2710:
2707:
2686:
2685:
2678:
2631:
2630:
2622:Added archive
2620:
2612:Added archive
2610:
2596:
2588:Added archive
2586:
2578:Added archive
2576:
2568:Added archive
2546:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2539:
2504:
2503:
2500:
2497:
2494:
2480:
2477:
2456:
2455:
2448:
2401:
2400:
2392:Added archive
2370:
2367:
2346:
2345:
2338:
2291:
2290:
2282:Added archive
2280:
2272:Added archive
2270:
2264:
2258:
2232:
2229:
2216:
2210:
2209:
2202:
2158:
2157:
2149:Added archive
2115:
2112:
2099:
2093:
2092:
2085:
2030:
2029:
2021:Added archive
1987:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1951:85.179.108.249
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1759:
1756:
1754:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1708:
1705:
1699:
1698:
1680:
1679:
1676:
1673:
1670:
1655:
1652:
1641:169.233.38.156
1598:
1597:
1594:
1585:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1448:
1390:
1382:
1378:
1342:
1341:
1327:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1310:
1309:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1270:
1244:
1164:
1161:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1121:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1062:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
942:
939:
902:
899:
819:
816:
814:
811:
791:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
712:
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
654:
653:
625:
622:
621:
620:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
549:
548:
547:
499:
498:
486:
485:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
360:
357:
303:
300:
297:
296:
293:
292:
289:
288:
285:Low-importance
275:
265:
264:
257:Low-importance
253:
247:
246:
244:
227:the discussion
214:
213:
197:
185:
184:
182:Low‑importance
170:
158:
157:
154:
153:
146:
140:
139:
137:
102:
90:
89:
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2989:
2978:
2975:
2973:
2970:
2968:
2965:
2963:
2960:
2958:
2955:
2953:
2950:
2948:
2945:
2943:
2940:
2939:
2937:
2928:
2924:
2920:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2904:147.46.57.248
2896:
2894:
2893:
2888:
2883:
2882:
2871:
2867:
2864:
2860:
2859:
2858:
2851:
2845:
2841:
2837:
2833:
2827:
2822:
2817:
2813:
2809:
2807:
2803:
2799:
2797:
2793:
2789:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2777:
2771:
2765:
2763:
2759:
2755:
2753:
2749:
2745:
2743:
2737:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2714:
2708:
2706:
2705:
2700:
2695:
2694:
2683:
2679:
2676:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2663:
2657:
2653:
2649:
2645:
2639:
2634:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2609:
2603:
2597:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2575:
2571:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2563:
2559:
2555:
2550:
2544:
2538:
2534:
2530:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2507:
2501:
2498:
2495:
2492:
2491:
2490:
2487:
2484:
2478:
2476:
2475:
2470:
2465:
2464:
2453:
2449:
2446:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2433:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2415:
2409:
2404:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2374:
2368:
2366:
2365:
2360:
2355:
2354:
2343:
2339:
2336:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2323:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2299:
2294:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2269:
2265:
2263:
2259:
2257:
2253:
2252:
2251:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2236:
2230:
2228:
2227:
2221:
2214:
2207:
2203:
2200:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2181:
2177:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2142:
2134:
2128:
2124:
2119:
2113:
2111:
2110:
2104:
2097:
2090:
2086:
2083:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2070:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2046:
2041:
2039:
2035:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2014:
2006:
2000:
1996:
1991:
1985:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1962:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1862:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1757:
1755:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1709:
1706:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1677:
1674:
1671:
1669:
1666:Knowledge is
1665:
1664:
1663:
1661:
1653:
1651:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1637:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1626:188.25.172.99
1623:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1602:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1583:
1571:
1568:
1565:
1561:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1506:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1475:
1470:
1469:Seraphimblade
1466:
1462:
1457:
1453:
1452:verifiability
1449:
1447:
1443:
1437:
1430:
1423:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1376:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1319:
1318:
1312:
1311:
1307:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1300:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1174:
1170:
1162:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1127:
1123:South America
1122:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1068:
1063:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:Santo Domingo
1022:
1018:
1010:
1005:
1003:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
973:Streetwalking
970:
965:
963:
959:
955:
951:
943:
940:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
916:
912:
908:
901:United States
900:
898:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:Ciudad Juárez
877:
876:
872:
868:
864:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
817:
813:North America
812:
810:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
786:
782:
778:
774:
767:
766:
763:
760:
745:
742:
740:
735:
730:
728:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
704:
701:
696:
695:
694:
691:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
675:
672:
668:
667:
666:
663:
658:
657:
656:
655:
652:
649:
645:
644:
643:
642:
639:
633:
631:
623:
619:
615:
611:
606:
602:
601:
600:
599:
595:
591:
585:
584:
581:
579:
574:
569:
567:
561:
550:
546:
543:
542:wikipediatrix
539:
538:
537:
534:
529:
528:
527:
524:
523:wikipediatrix
520:
519:
518:
515:
510:
509:
508:
507:
504:
495:
494:
493:
491:
484:
481:
476:
475:
474:
473:
470:
466:
449:
446:
441:
440:
439:
436:
435:wikipediatrix
432:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
420:
415:
410:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
392:
391:
390:
387:
386:wikipediatrix
383:
382:
381:
378:
373:
372:
371:
370:
367:
366:wikipediatrix
358:
356:
354:
350:
346:
342:
336:
334:
330:
326:
325:Sidney Gordon
322:
317:16 April 2021
309:
301:
286:
283:(assessed as
282:
281:
271:
267:
266:
262:
258:
252:
249:
248:
245:
228:
224:
220:
219:
211:
205:
200:
198:
195:
191:
190:
186:
179:
174:
171:
168:
164:
151:
145:
142:
141:
138:
134:List articles
121:
117:
113:
109:
108:
103:
100:
96:
95:
91:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2900:
2878:
2875:
2850:source check
2829:
2823:
2820:
2715:
2712:
2690:
2687:
2662:source check
2641:
2635:
2632:
2551:
2548:
2508:
2505:
2488:
2485:
2482:
2460:
2457:
2432:source check
2411:
2405:
2402:
2375:
2372:
2350:
2347:
2322:source check
2301:
2295:
2292:
2237:
2234:
2211:
2191:
2182:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2159:
2120:
2117:
2094:
2069:source check
2048:
2042:
2037:
2033:
2031:
1992:
1989:
1923:
1901:78.49.36.135
1753:
1681:
1657:
1638:
1617:
1603:
1599:
1587:
1584:Completeness
1480:
1455:
1385:
1374:
1369:
1368:be included
1365:
1343:
1302:
1166:
1150:Dick Kimball
1131:
1110:Dick Kimball
1100:
1089:Dick Kimball
1072:
1051:Dick Kimball
1040:
1029:Dick Kimball
1021:prostitution
1014:
993:Dick Kimball
985:Dick Kimball
969:prostitution
966:
944:
941:
938:
934:
930:
926:
922:
918:
907:Dick Kimball
904:
888:Dick Kimball
878:
863:Dick Kimball
852:strip joints
838:, including
836:Prostitution
828:Dick Kimball
821:
800:Dick Kimball
790:
768:
756:
738:
726:
634:
627:
586:
577:
565:
559:
558:
503:Tom Harrison
500:
487:
469:Tom Harrison
462:
362:
337:
305:
278:
256:
216:
116:project page
105:
68:WikiProjects
35:
2479:Page Length
2176:Sourcecheck
1945:—Preceding
1926:WP:PRESERVE
1830:78.48.5.167
1824:—Preceding
1774:78.48.5.167
1768:—Preceding
1718:78.48.5.167
1712:—Preceding
1620:—Preceding
1436:LeadSongDog
1370:at the time
1106:Sex tourism
1081:prostitutes
1047:Sex tourism
981:strip joint
948:—Preceding
871:Sex tourism
630:Rose Street
624:Dropping by
2936:Categories
2887:Report bug
2699:Report bug
2469:Report bug
2359:Report bug
1173:Storyville
1102:Costa Rica
1069:Costa Rica
977:soliciting
860:Zona Norte
759:Boy's Town
700:Necrothesp
690:MacRusgail
671:Necrothesp
662:MacRusgail
648:Necrothesp
638:MacRusgail
610:Kenhullett
605:Reeperbahn
590:Kenhullett
533:Necrothesp
514:Necrothesp
480:Necrothesp
445:Necrothesp
419:Necrothesp
377:Necrothesp
120:discussion
58:List-class
2919:John B123
2870:this tool
2863:this tool
2770:dead link
2736:dead link
2682:this tool
2675:this tool
2602:dead link
2529:John B123
2515:John B123
2452:this tool
2445:this tool
2342:this tool
2335:this tool
2206:this tool
2199:this tool
2089:this tool
2082:this tool
1660:this link
1515:Someidiot
1487:Someidiot
1441:come howl
1429:List fact
1395:WP:BURDEN
1347:Someidiot
1282:Someidiot
1260:Someidiot
1214:Someidiot
1178:Someidiot
1134:Venezuela
1128:Venezuela
1006:Caribbean
856:strippers
488:Briefly,
2876:Cheers.—
2688:Cheers.—
2458:Cheers.—
2348:Cheers.—
2212:Cheers.—
2133:cbignore
2095:Cheers.—
2005:cbignore
1947:unsigned
1930:Takeaway
1866:Kuguar03
1826:unsigned
1797:Kuguar03
1770:unsigned
1739:Kuguar03
1714:unsigned
1684:Kuguar03
1622:unsigned
1606:Mcorazao
1564:Garion96
1547:EeepEeep
1534:Garion96
1502:Garion96
1483:Garion96
1463:. We're
1399:Blueboar
1331:Mcorazao
1303:Comment:
1232:Garion96
1197:Garion96
1077:San Jose
950:unsigned
844:brothels
796:web site
785:contribs
773:unsigned
497:removed.
465:Svay Pak
345:PrimeBOT
333:Pelton98
178:Sex work
28:deletion
2774:tag to
2740:tag to
2722:my edit
2606:tag to
2558:my edit
2382:my edit
2244:my edit
2222::Online
2162:checked
2127:my edit
2105::Online
2034:checked
1999:my edit
1970:DeCausa
1248:Thimphu
1142:condoms
1085:English
884:El Paso
824:Tijuana
739:Shaolin
578:Shaolin
259:on the
2766:Added
2732:Added
2598:Added
2170:failed
2141:nobots
2013:nobots
1567:(talk)
1537:(talk)
1505:(talk)
1397:.
1386:insist
1252:Bhutan
1235:(talk)
1200:(talk)
1146:Viagra
1144:, and
1083:speak
818:Mexico
492:says
64:scale.
1966:WP:RS
1861:intro
1075:] in
954:Floyd
777:Mjh05
409:rules
329:Vzhan
125:Lists
87:Lists
2923:talk
2908:talk
2533:talk
2519:talk
2166:true
2038:true
1974:talk
1955:talk
1934:talk
1928:. -
1905:talk
1870:talk
1834:talk
1801:talk
1778:talk
1743:talk
1722:talk
1688:talk
1645:talk
1630:talk
1610:talk
1551:talk
1519:talk
1491:talk
1450:The
1413:WT:V
1403:talk
1366:must
1362:WT:V
1351:talk
1335:talk
1286:talk
1276:and
1264:talk
1218:talk
1182:talk
1167:Per
1154:talk
1114:talk
1093:talk
1055:talk
1041:The
1033:talk
997:talk
989:talk
975:and
958:talk
911:talk
892:talk
867:talk
850:and
848:bars
832:talk
804:talk
781:talk
727:Alex
614:talk
594:talk
566:Alex
349:talk
315:and
36:keep
34:was
2844:RfC
2814:to
2804:to
2794:to
2784:to
2760:to
2750:to
2656:RfC
2626:to
2616:to
2592:to
2582:to
2572:to
2426:RfC
2396:to
2316:RfC
2286:to
2276:to
2180:).
2168:or
2153:to
2063:RfC
2025:to
1465:not
1456:add
1389:it.
1375:why
414:AfD
343:by
251:Low
144:???
2938::
2925:)
2910:)
2857:.
2852:}}
2848:{{
2772:}}
2768:{{
2738:}}
2734:{{
2669:.
2664:}}
2660:{{
2604:}}
2600:{{
2535:)
2521:)
2439:.
2434:}}
2430:{{
2329:.
2324:}}
2320:{{
2178:}}
2174:{{
2139:{{
2135:}}
2131:{{
2076:.
2071:}}
2067:{{
2011:{{
2007:}}
2003:{{
1976:)
1957:)
1936:)
1907:)
1872:)
1836:)
1803:)
1780:)
1745:)
1724:)
1690:)
1647:)
1632:)
1612:)
1604:--
1553:)
1521:)
1493:)
1432:}}
1426:{{
1405:)
1353:)
1337:)
1329:--
1288:)
1266:)
1220:)
1184:)
1156:)
1148:.
1140:,
1116:)
1108:.
1095:)
1087:.
1057:)
1049:.
1035:)
999:)
960:)
913:)
894:)
873:.
842:,
826:?
806:)
794:]
783:•
733:Ov
636:--
616:)
596:)
572:Ov
351:)
335:.
331:,
287:).
176::
2921:(
2906:(
2889:)
2885:(
2872:.
2865:.
2701:)
2697:(
2684:.
2677:.
2531:(
2517:(
2471:)
2467:(
2454:.
2447:.
2361:)
2357:(
2344:.
2337:.
2208:.
2201:.
2189:Y
2091:.
2084:.
1972:(
1953:(
1932:(
1903:(
1868:(
1832:(
1799:(
1776:(
1741:(
1720:(
1686:(
1643:(
1628:(
1608:(
1549:(
1517:(
1489:(
1401:(
1349:(
1333:(
1284:(
1262:(
1216:(
1180:(
1152:(
1112:(
1091:(
1053:(
1031:(
995:(
987:(
956:(
909:(
890:(
865:(
830:(
802:(
779:(
612:(
592:(
347:(
263:.
152:.
122:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.