Knowledge

Talk:Lucky numbers of Euler

Source 📝

67: 49: 22: 220:
Using the given criteria, 1 should not be included because 1^2 - 1 + 1 = 1 is not a prime number. The OEIS sequence doesn't include 1, nor does Wolfram Mathworld.
248: 107: 113: 253: 243: 83: 74: 54: 29: 135:
This can be (and usually is) presented as $ n^2 + n + 41$ -- is it worth adding a paragraph explaining this? --
136: 35: 66: 48: 225: 221: 82:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
206: 144:
Yes, I think it is needed to explain. Confused me a lot, but I figured it out now: Let
237: 202: 229: 210: 139: 79: 15: 78:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 28:This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge's 112:This article has not yet received a rating on the 8: 43: 21: 19: 45: 7: 72:This article is within the scope of 249:Unknown-importance Numbers articles 34:It is of interest to the following 14: 216:1 is not a lucky number of Euler 65: 47: 20: 1: 92:Knowledge:WikiProject Numbers 86:and see a list of open tasks. 254:WikiProject Numbers articles 95:Template:WikiProject Numbers 244:Unassessed Numbers articles 270: 211:15:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 140:06:18, 11 April 2017 (UTC) 114:project's importance scale 230:23:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC) 111: 60: 42: 131:Alternative presentation 75:WikiProject Numbers 182:. The relation is 30:content assessment 128: 127: 124: 123: 120: 119: 261: 200: 181: 162: 100: 99: 98:Numbers articles 96: 93: 90: 69: 62: 61: 51: 44: 25: 24: 23: 16: 269: 268: 264: 263: 262: 260: 259: 258: 234: 233: 218: 183: 164: 145: 133: 97: 94: 91: 88: 87: 12: 11: 5: 267: 265: 257: 256: 251: 246: 236: 235: 217: 214: 132: 129: 126: 125: 122: 121: 118: 117: 110: 104: 103: 101: 84:the discussion 70: 58: 57: 52: 40: 39: 33: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 266: 255: 252: 250: 247: 245: 242: 241: 239: 232: 231: 227: 223: 215: 213: 212: 208: 204: 198: 194: 190: 186: 179: 175: 171: 167: 160: 156: 152: 148: 142: 141: 138: 137:Matt Westwood 130: 115: 109: 106: 105: 102: 85: 81: 77: 76: 71: 68: 64: 63: 59: 56: 53: 50: 46: 41: 37: 31: 27: 18: 17: 219: 196: 192: 188: 184: 177: 173: 169: 165: 158: 154: 150: 146: 143: 134: 73: 36:WikiProjects 238:Categories 222:Travisrm89 203:Lilalas 191:+ 1) = 89:Numbers 80:Numbers 55:Numbers 32:scale. 226:talk 207:talk 201:. -- 180:+ 41 172:) = 163:and 161:+ 41 153:) = 108:??? 240:: 228:) 209:) 176:+ 157:− 224:( 205:( 199:) 197:n 195:( 193:g 189:n 187:( 185:f 178:n 174:n 170:n 168:( 166:g 159:n 155:n 151:n 149:( 147:f 116:. 38::

Index

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Numbers
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Numbers
Numbers
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
Matt Westwood
06:18, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Lilalas
talk
15:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Travisrm89
talk
23:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Categories
Unassessed Numbers articles
Unknown-importance Numbers articles
WikiProject Numbers articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.