53:. I don't quite agree regarding the OR charge and/or the copyright violation. The lecture notes are normal lectures notes for class about known material (not notes on research project) hence there is no OR here. The drawings are fairly standard as well, hence als long as the WP editor it not a simply cut & paste job but was recreating the drawing on its own there is no copyright issue. These drawing are essentially the same like drawing for instance a triangle, a circle, tetrahedron or function in a math book, there is no copyright on such images. The same goes for reusing the content of the lectures as long as the wp editor did not literally copy all text lines, but used his one where appropriate (some standard things like a definition or math notation will have to be identical anyhow).--
25:. There are several good reasons for that choice (of which page is to be the redirect) but the main one seems to be that the current page appears to be a massive copyright violation of Hartmann's Lecture Notes (in the external link section) including the diagrams which the editor claims to be his\her own. Of course, if the editor is Hartmann the copyright violation is moot (I could be challenged on that point by someone more legally inclined than I am), but then the article is in violation of
67:
P.S. Another thing is that in the current state this article is full of latex/display errors and can't stay this way anyhow. Since a redirect is the most likely result of this discussion it makes little sense to fix it. So I'd suggest if there's no objection to change this into a redirect right away.
48:
is already existing for a long time and the proper approach is extend an existing article rather than creating a new one in parallel (for no good reason). Hence this should be turned into a redirect and the additional material intregrated into
21:
There should not be two pages concerning the same mathematical object ... alternate spellings are to be handled by redirects. This page should be changed to a redirect to
209:
text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of
236:
for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators
198:
244:
from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.
146:
142:
149:
gets 159 (the lack of umlauts in many of the links is probably due to limitations of typography). Also, we have articles on
158:
162:
241:
185:
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
154:
108:
before merging. Also, it would be better etiquette to let the creator of this article respond before merging.
249:
170:
113:
91:
229:
206:
202:
138:
194:
186:
245:
189:. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored,
166:
109:
87:
34:
77:
58:
150:
134:
105:
69:
50:
45:
22:
68:
and the author of this article is welcome to incorporate the additional material into
233:
30:
26:
193:
it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
225:
be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original
73:
54:
101:
253:
174:
117:
95:
81:
62:
38:
29:. In either case, this article in its current form will not survive.
44:
I agree regarding the rdirect but for slightly different reasons.
104:). There is content in this article that could be transferred to
100:
JBL, if you're going to merge articles, please do it right (see
187:
http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~ehartmann/circlegeom.pdf
197:
if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
86:
I'm going to go ahead and change it to a redirect. --
165:. There is no good reason to buck the trend.
8:
195:"using copyrighted works from others"
7:
14:
232:from that source. Please see our
199:"donating copyrighted materials"
141:: in Google Scholar, the search
1:
254:23:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
221:. Accordingly, the material
175:20:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
118:20:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
96:20:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
82:19:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
63:19:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
39:04:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
269:
234:guideline on non-free text
213:, but not as a source of
181:Copyright problem removed
159:Möbius inversion formula
163:August Ferdinand Möbius
147:"mobius plane" -moebius
143:"moebius plane" -mobius
155:Möbius transformation
72:if he's interested.--
205:, we cannot accept
145:gets 28 hits while
201:if you are.) For
260:
161:, and of course
31:Bill Cherowitzo
268:
267:
263:
262:
261:
259:
258:
257:
183:
133:- the spelling
19:
12:
11:
5:
266:
264:
182:
179:
178:
177:
137:is favored by
127:
126:
125:
124:
123:
122:
121:
120:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
265:
256:
255:
251:
247:
246:RockMagnetist
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
203:legal reasons
200:
196:
192:
188:
180:
176:
172:
168:
167:RockMagnetist
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
139:WP:COMMONNAME
136:
132:
129:
128:
119:
115:
111:
110:RockMagnetist
107:
103:
99:
98:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
83:
79:
75:
71:
66:
65:
64:
60:
56:
52:
47:
43:
42:
41:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
16:
237:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
190:
184:
151:Möbius strip
135:Möbius plane
130:
106:Möbius plane
70:Möbius plane
51:Möbius plane
46:Möbius plane
23:Möbius plane
20:
211:information
207:copyrighted
230:plagiarize
102:Help:Merge
215:sentences
17:Redirect
242:blocked
219:phrases
191:unless
74:Kmhkmh
55:Kmhkmh
131:Merge
27:WP:OR
250:talk
238:will
171:talk
114:talk
92:talk
78:talk
59:talk
35:talk
240:be
223:may
217:or
88:JBL
252:)
227:or
173:)
157:,
153:,
116:)
94:)
80:)
61:)
37:)
248:(
169:(
112:(
90:(
76:(
57:(
33:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.