669:
other
Knowledge articles a sources and, second, direct citations need to present on any claim that is subject to doubt. FWIW, the calculation is beyond my capabilities, and I suspect that may be true for many other readers of Knowledge, as well. That is why I resorted to online calendar calculators, one of which told me that 1 January 01 (Gregorian) was a Saturday; another told me that 1 January 00 was a Saturday and, since this was (proleptically) a leap-year, 01 January 01 would indeed be a Monday. Neither one would tell me why it is "convenient" for either year 00 (i.e., 1 BC) or 01 to begin with any particular day of the week (I personally favor Wednesday, for absolutely no good reason at all, it's just a gut feeling), so this statement remains
700:
calendars: it is within our lifetime, whereas 0001-01-01 is not. We also have enough newspapers and records from recent times to confirm beyond any shadow of a doubt what day of the week 2001-01-01 was: we can't say the same for 0001-01-01. That is the real reason I pulled the calculation to 2001-01-01. If there is any shadow of a doubt in your mind that 2001-01-01 was a Monday, look at newspapers, bulletins, calendars, etc., from then. Then using the 400-year rule, go back to 0001-01-01. If you doubt the 400-year rule, then calculate this: (365*400)+(400/4)-(400/100)+(400/400) and then divide by 7 and verify that it comes out even with no fraction left over.
864:
transcription of the
Swedish word måndag, meaning Monday. Most other weekdays have names similar to their Swedish counterparts, as well. However, since Finnish comes from a different language family than Swedish, the words don't actually mean anything at all in Finnish - and have never meant. If it was called "moon day" in Finnish, it would be "kuun päivä", which is kinda different from "monday". I'd guess the names must have been brought by the Swedes when they took over Finland, transforming it from the last European wilderness into the system of all land area divided into states with fancy flags.
31:
85:
64:
696:
other years -- that is how the table was constructed. This table can also be (and should perhaps also be) spot-checked by means of whatever calendar you have handy, such as a wall calendar, pocket planner, or cell phone calendar. I know because I constructed the table myself (although using a different base year) and performed a number of spot checks on it -- I believe I used the JavaScript date function for at least some of these spot checks.
794:
nature, any computer calculation hides whatever day of the week it treats as first from the user (though not from the programmer). So it does not matter what day of the week is first as far as the program is concerned. Furthermore, REXX treats 1 January 1 Gregorian as the zeroth day of the week as Anon states, not the first day of the week. Many other programming languages determine the day of the week by taking the
22:
157:
570:
like asking for a reference that the Earth is round. Using this rule, and knowledge which is if anything even more common (such as the number of days in a year and in a week), and simple calculation, I can tell that 400 years makes a whole number of weeks with no days left over, a fact which I have seen in print as well as in
Knowledge.
776:(c. 360) used two overlaping weeks, one beginning on Sunday, the other beginning on Wednesday. Athanasius called the day of the week in his Wednesday week the "day of the Gods" because it was the principal week described by the astrologer Vettius Valens and Anthanasius explicitly numbered it 1–7, 1 being Wednesday. See
995:. It can be safely left as an exercise for the reader to figure out if this suggests if this means that it was considered the "first" or the "second" day. The tradition of considering Monday the first day of the week is related to the notion of a "week-end", a term that first appears in the 17th century. --
901:
The order of the days of the week are not mentioned in the original 1582 Gregorian calendar documents in Latin (bull, canons, and two calendars) because the
Gregorian calendar is only a modification of the Julian calendar used by the Roman Catholic Church before 1582. So anything in the calendar that
314:
I've never heard of the
Boomtown Rats or the song. The song "Monday, Monday" by The Mamas and the Papas is far more popular, but I fail to see how either belongs in the article. There's a quote in the Gilmore Girls episode, "Partings," where Lorelai says, "I don't like Mondays, but unfortunately they
877:
article to support this, indeed quite the opposite: the current article states that opinions vary over this matter. As far as I understand it, the
Gregorian calendar specifies that today is Tuesday 11 September 2012 rather than some other date; it doesn't specify whether today is the second or third
491:
It says that the
Russian word понедельник means "After Sunday", but doesn't it come from the word неделя, for week, so it would mean "Beginning of the week" or something like that? In any case, if the section is called "Origins of the name", shouldn't it be talking about origins of the English word
569:
Pick up almost literally any reference work with a section on calendars, and it will give the
Gregorian leap year rule. I have seen this rule repeated in many places since I was a child. I have even read transcribed and/or translated source texts on this rule. Asking for a reference of this rule is
863:
Looking at the list of translations, I was surprised to notice that only names referring to moon or first day of the week have been listed. I find it unlikely that it could really be so, that all languages have it that way. In
Finnish the day is called "maanantai", which _to my ear_ sounds like a
793:
Despite this, Anon's statement "For purposes of calculation, it may prove helpful, even necessary, to treat the week as beginning on Monday, because in the proleptic
Gregorian calendar, January 1 of the year 1 was a Monday." is patently false due to the words "helpful" and "necessary". By its very
695:
The reason I mentioned dominical letters was because they were part of the calculation. The papal bull confirmed that the Knowledge dominical letter table was correct (at least for that one example). Knowing the dominical letter for one year, you can count forward and backward to determine it for
573:
We are now halfway there. The other half is to correlate this 400-year cycle with a known weekday. Our date 0001-01-01 would (we now know) fall on the same weekday as its anniversary at 400-year intervals. Five such intervals carry us to 2001-01-01. Look this date up on any calendar -- I used the
668:
This may well be absurd, but it is the way Knowledge works. The purpose is to avoid the kind of hoaxes and self-promotion that caused embarrassment a few years ago. The kind of circuitous article-hopping you suggest for verification is not acceptable for two reasons: first, it improperly invokes
699:
Also, I had a sould reason for using calculation to pull the date to check from 0001-01-01 to 2001-01-01. The former date is hard to verify and can only be accessed by extrapolation from an existing calendar. The latter date is much easier to verify as is it (with good reason) available on more
639:
will change to C. This agrees with the table given in the dominical letter article. From the text of this bull and calculation (along with the definition of dominical letter), one can by a similar but different path verify my claim. If you want more details regarding dominical letters (a not
577:
If a computer program claims that 0001-01-01 was not a Monday, then either (a) its calendar was not proleptic Gregorian (Julian, perhaps?) or (b) it contains a bug (does it use the correct leap year rule? is its year 01 = AD 1 or AD 1901 or AD 2001? is its month 1 = January or February?).
798:
modulo 7, which, like REXX, starts its count of days with 0 (but at 1 January 4713 BC Julian, not Gregorian), so its day of the week is also numbered 0–6, 0 being Monday. Adding 1 to convert this into 1–7 is an extra step which is neither helpful nor necessary. Totally different is the
457:
I sincerely hope I haven't treaded on anyone's toes by restructuring these pages, but there really wasn't any consistency among them, and some pages looked awful messy. Of course feel free to revert or edit what I've changed. Unfortunately I never haver had time to do Friday to Sunday.
755:
page 87, the DATE(Base) function returns the number of complete days since and including the local date 1 January 1 in the Gregorian calendar. For REXX, this was day 0 because the modulo function DATE(Base)//7 returns 0 for Monday. For the calendar and other documents such as the
390:
I've never heard it referred to as the first day, in any of the places I've lived here. I'm removing the reference since I don't think it's held as such by the majority. That's only my experience, but I'd like to see a source indicating the contrary if the mention is to be made.
540:
In Russian we have the Cyrillic followed by the romanization in parentheses, whereas for the other two the romanization comes first followed by the native writing style in parantheses. I would change it, but I'm wondering if there's some guideline as to which format is correct.
417:
I too am an Australian and in school we were taught that Sunday was the first day of the week. When someone says 'next week' it means from Sunday onwards. In Australia though Monday is often referred to as the 'first day of the working week', but not the calendar week.
829:
By "first", I did not mean "given an array index of 1", but rather simply "first" in the ordinary sense of the word. And anyway, where do you suppose the Julian day number or its equivalent comes from? Calculation. And where do you start your calculations?
640:
unreasonable request), I refer you to the calendar attached to the bull, which I am having trouble finding online. And while we're at it: I believe that mere calculation constitutes neither original research nor synthesis, according to Knowledge guidelines.
581:
As for claims that this information is perhaps not as useful as I had claimed: for one, the programming language REXX uses proleptic Gregorian 0001-01-01 for its day 0, perhaps because it seems a very natural, easy-to-remember starting point.
234:
We shouldn't have bias in describing the position of the day in the week. Saying "Traditionally, yadayada, but some modern Europeans like to think of it as yadayada" has bias. Saying "Some think this, and some think that" doesn't have bias. -
872:
Various anonymous IPs (probably the same person) keep trying to insert a claim, in this article and all the other days-of-week articles, that the Gregorian calendar specifies that Sunday is the first day of the week. I see nothing in the
565:
0001-01-01 was a Monday was original research. I claim that this was, for the most part, calculation rather than "research", and the little "research" was simple use of common and publicly-available knowledge. Let me explain:
492:"Monday" rather than just random information about the word in other languages? I guess the fact that it is moon-related in all the other mentioned languages is relevant, maybe the entire piece about Russian is unnecessary.
967:
Modern calendars are almost always displayed as grids of four or five weeks for each month, each week beginning with either Sunday or Monday. This is a recent technique that began in the mid-19th century as a result of the
972:. All earlier calendars, including the calendars in the Latin Gregorian calendar documents, were displayed as 12 monthly columns of 28 to 31 days applicable to any year. The only indication of any weekday was the
677:. Thank you for mentioning dominical letters. I have never heard of them before, and their relevance to calendars and the convenience of starting year 0 or 01 on a particular weekday sounds intriguing.—
906:(Lord's Day, equivalent to Sunday) is mentioned repeatedly, but without its order relative to the other days of the week. The best source for the days of the week in the Julian/Gregorian calendar is
472:
As all the other days of the week show pictured of antique artwork, I figured the Galileo picture was more in keeping with the style than the previous moon photograph, hence why I changed it.
803:
which starts with 1 at Friday. Removing the false helpful/necessary phrase leaves the trivial fact that 1 January 1 Gregorian is a Monday, which does not improve the article in my opinion. —
574:
JavaScript Date function in the browser I was using at the time -- and you will see that it was a Monday. QED. (P.S. I just checked my cell phone calendar and this date was indeed a Monday.)
247:
I've checked in a couple of dictionaries for the etymology of the word "Monday", and they say that it just comes from words meaning "day of the moon". No mention of a Saxon deity named "
1057:
414:
I'm an Australian, I work in education and I have never, ever, not once seen or heard of anything except Sunday, in all my 28 years of life, referred to as the beginning of the week.
922:. Bede clearly stated that the Gentiles dedicated the first day of the week to the Sun, and he named the days of the ecclesiastical week (which had weekdays numbered from Sunday) as
976:(A–G) beside each day of the month. The user had to consult a table to determine the Dominical letter for a specific year before he could determine the weekday of any date. —
371:
I've never noticed that Australians regard Monday as the first day of the week. People I speak to regard it as the second day (albeit the first day of the "working week").
1062:
359:"A possible reason for Mondayitis is that human circadian rhythms are incompatible with the normal 35 to 40-hour working week." Does anybody have a source for this?
1047:
1052:
35:
1042:
293:
Wasn't that song about a girl who freaked out on a Monday and shot several people, and later gave the excuse for her deed "I don't like mondays."?
537:"The Russian word...is понедельник (poniediélnik)...The Japanese word for Monday is getsuyōbi (月曜日)...Monday is xingqi yi (星期一) in Chinese..."
1072:
196:
135:
125:
748:
499:
1037:
716:
656:
598:
1067:
837:
316:
670:
101:
633:
This is absurd. But even if I am to do it this way... if I remember correctly, the relevant 16th-century papal bull (text at
612:
608:
955:
740:
401:
382:
44:
878:
day of the week. If someone can provide a reliable source to prove I'm wrong then of course I'll change my position. --
674:
204:
92:
69:
752:
523:
773:
503:
21:
712:
652:
594:
841:
270:
Blimey. I'd like to work where you do! My normal working week is nearer 37 hours. Or have I misunderstood?
1019:
320:
251:". The only references to Mona that I can find in books about mythology relate to a place associated with
969:
739:
by Reingold and Derschowitz, which is considered a reliable source. It confirms that 1 January 1 in the
708:
682:
648:
620:
590:
519:
50:
951:
833:
704:
644:
586:
495:
732:
1000:
981:
808:
562:
542:
339:
Don't know in other languages, but the portuguese name for Monday is not "second day", but "second
260:
186:
100:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
874:
546:
297:
208:
392:
1015:
887:
795:
761:
477:
463:
444:
429:
315:
come around eventually." Do we really need to list instances of Monday in popular culture? --
185:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
915:
973:
919:
757:
678:
636:
616:
381:
Really? Not in my experience. After all, why start the week in the middle of the weekend? --
219:
169:
902:
was not changed continued in use unchanged. However, the principal day of the week, called
744:
286:
635:]) mentions explicitly that immediately after the Gregorian calendar change in 1582, the
282:
Can we put in the boomtown rats song or is it too trivial? Might fit with Mondayitis? --
84:
63:
996:
977:
804:
777:
769:
360:
348:
1014:
I was hoping to find an explanation of how old the practice is of closing on Mondays.
615:. Just please give the sources that verify the claim. It shouldn't be that difficult.—
1031:
765:
305:
880:
473:
459:
423:
236:
422:
Sunday indeed is regarded as the first day of the week in Australia, not Monday.
959:
372:
214:
800:
300:. The event itself might be material for the article, but hardly the song. --
283:
271:
962:, pope 314–335, but Wallis notes that other Church Fathers used it earlier.
309:
518:
New to wikipedia just learning by going around and correcting small typos
301:
256:
557:
Claim of "original research" re proleptic Gregorian 0001-01-01 = Monday
344:
177:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
259:. So was there really a Saxon moon deity named "Mona", or not? --
252:
911:
248:
97:
151:
15:
1023:
1004:
985:
895:
845:
812:
686:
624:
550:
527:
507:
481:
467:
447:
432:
404:
395:
385:
375:
324:
224:
203:
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join
956:
Names of the days of the week#Days numbered from Sunday
743:
was a Monday. It also confirms that 1 January 1 in the
735:
is the online calendar conversion program described in
400:
Oh well, Sunday has always been at the weekend to me --
255:, which I gather has been idenified with the island of
96:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
914:(725). Specifically, in Latin (Giles 1863 edtion):
991:The name of Monday since late Antiquity has been
1058:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Technology
958:). Bede stated that this usage orginated with
766:Les textes fondateurs du calendrier grégorien
8:
211:for a list of articles that need improving.
19:
58:
1010:Museums and restaurants closed on Mondays
1063:Start-Class vital articles in Technology
60:
1048:Knowledge vital articles in Technology
343:" ("Segunda feira"). More info in the
918:or in English (Wallis 1999 edition):
7:
778:Week-day names#First Hour of the Day
751:calendar is wrong. According to the
90:This article is within the scope of
49:It is of interest to the following
1053:Start-Class level-5 vital articles
561:I was told that my statement that
197:WikiProject Time assessment rating
14:
268:"the normal 24-hour working week"
1043:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
155:
83:
62:
29:
20:
946:(sixth weekday or Friday), and
938:(fourth weekday or Wednesday),
607:All of this either constitutes
130:This article has been rated as
986:23:09, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
910:(On the reckoning of time) by
896:12:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
1005:13:54, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
942:(fifth weekday or Thursday),
453:Revamped Monday thru Thursday
104:and see a list of open tasks.
1073:Mid-importance Time articles
934:(third weekday or Tuesday),
930:(second weekday or Monday),
741:proleptic Gregorian calendar
325:20:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
277:
760:attached to the papal bull
551:06:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
405:12:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
396:12:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
386:11:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
363:18:57, 2005 August 8 (UTC)
1089:
1038:Start-Class vital articles
1024:07:42, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
916:"Caput VIII: De hebdomada"
846:03:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
813:03:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
768:in French and Latin. Both
687:22:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
625:06:03, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
482:19:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
468:19:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
443:What is it doing here? --
433:10:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
376:22:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
310:15:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
225:05:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
136:project's importance scale
110:Knowledge:WikiProject Time
1068:Start-Class Time articles
950:(Sabbath or Saturday) in
753:REXX/400 Reference manual
448:01:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
351:12:46, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
335:About the portuguese name
289:15:40, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
274:22:09, 22 Nov 2003 (UTC)
263:03:37, 12 Nov 2003 (UTC)
129:
113:Template:WikiProject Time
78:
57:
926:(Lord's Day or Sunday),
774:Athanasius of Alexandria
737:Calendrical Calculations
673:until corroborated by a
508:20:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
239:14:44 Jan 3, 2003 (UTC)
528:02:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
402:Angry mob mulls options
383:Angry mob mulls options
719:) 20:25, 28 March 2009
659:) 02:47, 28 March 2009
601:) 01:46, 28 March 2009
970:Industrial Revolution
920:"Chapter 8: The week"
868:First day of the week
487:Russian word meaning?
36:level-5 vital article
952:Ecclesiastical Latin
747:was a Saturday. The
345:portuguese wikipedia
278:I don't like Mondays
908:De temporum ratione
772:(c. 160) and Saint
563:proleptic Gregorian
875:Gregorian calendar
613:improper synthesis
298:Brenda Ann Spencer
45:content assessment
1003:
891:
836:comment added by
801:Lilian day number
796:Julian day number
762:Inter gravissimas
721:
707:comment added by
661:
647:comment added by
611:, or constitutes
609:Original Research
603:
589:comment added by
510:
498:comment added by
439:Current Event Tag
243:Saxon moon deity?
193:
192:
172:in most browsers.
150:
149:
146:
145:
142:
141:
1080:
999:
974:Dominical letter
894:
892:
889:
885:
848:
758:dominical letter
720:
701:
660:
641:
637:dominical letter
602:
583:
520:Christopher ohio
493:
355:Circadian Rythms
222:
205:WikiProject Time
187:Reporting errors
159:
158:
152:
118:
117:
114:
111:
108:
93:WikiProject Time
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1028:
1027:
1012:
888:
881:
879:
870:
861:
831:
745:Julian calendar
702:
675:reliable source
642:
584:
559:
535:
489:
455:
441:
369:
357:
337:
280:
245:
232:
220:
201:
189:
175:
174:
173:
156:
115:
112:
109:
106:
105:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
1086:
1084:
1076:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1030:
1029:
1011:
1008:
989:
988:
964:
963:
904:dies dominicus
869:
866:
860:
859:Why only moon?
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
770:Vettius Valens
725:
724:
723:
722:
697:
690:
689:
665:
664:
663:
662:
628:
627:
558:
555:
534:
531:
517:
513:
500:129.74.155.201
488:
485:
454:
451:
440:
437:
436:
435:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
368:
365:
356:
353:
336:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
279:
276:
265:
244:
241:
231:
228:
212:
200:
194:
191:
190:
184:
183:
182:
170:case-sensitive
164:
163:
162:
160:
148:
147:
144:
143:
140:
139:
132:Mid-importance
128:
122:
121:
119:
102:the discussion
88:
76:
75:
73:Mid‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1085:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1033:
1026:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1009:
1007:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
993:feria secunda
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
966:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
928:feria secunda
925:
924:dies dominica
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
900:
899:
898:
897:
893:
886:
884:
876:
867:
865:
858:
847:
843:
839:
835:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
814:
810:
806:
802:
797:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
754:
750:
749:Time and Date
746:
742:
738:
734:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
718:
714:
710:
709:76.208.249.18
706:
698:
694:
693:
692:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
672:
667:
666:
658:
654:
650:
649:75.35.187.148
646:
638:
634:
632:
631:
630:
629:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
605:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:75.35.187.148
588:
579:
575:
571:
567:
564:
556:
554:
552:
548:
544:
538:
532:
530:
529:
525:
521:
515:
511:
509:
505:
501:
497:
486:
484:
483:
479:
475:
470:
469:
465:
461:
452:
450:
449:
446:
438:
434:
431:
430:
427:
426:
421:
420:
419:
415:
406:
403:
399:
398:
397:
394:
389:
388:
387:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
374:
366:
364:
362:
354:
352:
350:
346:
342:
334:
326:
322:
318:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
294:
292:
291:
290:
288:
285:
275:
273:
269:
264:
262:
258:
254:
250:
242:
240:
238:
229:
227:
226:
223:
218:
217:
210:
207:or visit the
206:
198:
195:
188:
180:
179:
178:
171:
167:
161:
154:
153:
137:
133:
127:
124:
123:
120:
116:Time articles
103:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1013:
992:
990:
947:
943:
940:feria quinta
939:
936:feria quarta
935:
932:feria tertia
931:
927:
923:
907:
903:
882:
871:
862:
838:75.27.151.55
736:
580:
576:
572:
568:
560:
539:
536:
516:
512:
490:
471:
456:
445:Lord Snoeckx
442:
428:
424:
416:
413:
370:
358:
340:
338:
317:67.42.107.14
281:
267:
266:
246:
233:
215:
202:
176:
168:Anchors are
165:
131:
91:
51:WikiProjects
34:
960:Sylvester I
944:feria sexta
832:—Preceding
703:—Preceding
679:Jerome Kohl
643:—Preceding
617:Jerome Kohl
585:—Preceding
533:Unity Issue
494:—Preceding
209:Time Portal
41:Start-class
1032:Categories
733:Calendrica
230:Discussion
978:Joe Kress
805:Joe Kress
367:Australia
361:Judzillah
349:SugarKane
261:Oliver P.
39:is rated
948:sabbatum
883:Dr Greg
834:unsigned
717:contribs
705:unsigned
657:contribs
645:unsigned
599:contribs
587:unsigned
496:unsigned
257:Anglesey
474:Annatto
460:Annatto
237:Khendon
199:comment
134:on the
764:, see
373:Avalon
253:druids
216:Yamara
47:scale.
954:(See
543:Brett
514:Typo
425:Gizza
393:Radix
296:Yes,
287:|talk
284:BozMo
28:This
1020:talk
1016:Greg
1001:(𒁳)
982:talk
912:Bede
890:talk
842:talk
809:talk
713:talk
683:talk
653:talk
621:talk
595:talk
553:bye
547:talk
524:talk
504:talk
478:talk
464:talk
341:fair
321:talk
306:talk
272:TimR
249:Mona
166:Tip:
107:Time
98:Time
70:Time
997:dab
671:POV
302:Jao
126:Mid
1034::
1022:)
984:)
844:)
811:)
715:•
685:)
655:•
623:)
597:•
549:)
526:)
506:)
480:)
466:)
347:--
323:)
308:)
1018:(
980:(
840:(
807:(
780:.
711:(
681:(
651:(
619:(
593:(
545:(
522:(
502:(
476:(
462:(
319:(
304:(
221:✉
213:—
181:]
138:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
