575:
business with
Mizulina and her son is huge in Russia, there are literally hundreds of newspaper articles. We could keep adding more sources indefinitely. In addition to anti-paedophile crusade, Mizulina is hard-working trying to prohibit abortions, reverse the separation of church and state and put the "spiritual mission of the Russian Orthodox church" in Russian constitution, making quite a few enemies in process. The enemies are usually accused in being "paedophile lobby", whatever it is, and harrassed by Russian police.
664:. I understand that the LGBT issue in Russia is a delicate and serious one, but ultimately unless reliable sources can be produced that prove the company's involvement in this, the material should be kept off the article, because it implies that the company is somehow guilty by association because one of its 1,500 employees said something stupid. I will note that none of the sources in Russian that I was able to read via Google Translate seem to imply or place any blame in the company
71:
53:
359:#whois 143.58.160.6 NetRange: 143.58.0.0 - 143.58.255.255 CIDR: 143.58.0.0/16 OrgName: Mayer Brown LLP OrgId: MBRML Address: 71 S. Wacker City: Chicago StateProv: IL PostalCode: 60606 Country: US RegDate: 2006-01-12 Updated: 2013-05-07 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/MBRML OrgTechHandle: MCS7-ARIN OrgTechName: Sherman, Michael C OrgTechPhone: +1-312-701-8315 OrgTechEmail:
81:
874:
Mayer Brown offices right now (well, within a week at least). Obviously, there are people in Mayer Brown who would pay a lot to suppress the information about controversy, pickets and demonstrations. However, this is censorship, and I see no reason for
Knowledge (XXG) as a whole to support it. The information is well sourced and notable enough for multiple activists to organize pickets and demonstrations agains Mayer Brown, hence by definition notable.
520:
Knowledge (XXG) article suggests their complicity in crimes, but we have no sources supporting this. Therefore, the best course is to leave the article as it is, and wait for further developments, which would implicate Mayer Brown, or acquit; and to update the article once the information is available. Knowledge (XXG) is not for guessing, and not for whitewashing, it is a collection of notable information found in reliable sources.
908:. Many of the sources are Russian, so I am unable to assess them. However, I think that the principle here is quite simple: if there is significant coverage in reliable sources which explicitly links the firm to the LGBT controversy, then the material belongs here. If the linkage is sourced only to campaigners or to unreliable sources, then it doesn't belong here. Can anyone clarify what the sources are? --
22:
342:
rights, hence breaks the laws instigated by
Russian government". I thought that outside of Russia and Islam theocracies supporting LGBT is not a crime or a defamation requiring speedy blanking. Also, the anonymous user person who blanked the section came from an IP 143.58.160.6, associated with Mayer Brown in the whois database.
449:
issue has no direct reflection on the firm. Someone's son, seriously? If this indeed was a huge deal, I'm sure you can find sources that directly implicate the company somehow, in some way, that would merit inclusion in this article. So far what you have is not nearly enough, so please either improve it, or keep it off.
491:
Regarding finding an evidence of paid editing, you know perfectly well that there is no way to prove that someone does it, if the person is sane enough to retain a few obvious precautions. However, the market of paid editing in
Knowledge (XXG) is huge. In light of to Mayer Brown's obvious concern and
984:
In June 2013, the writer and former
Russian Vice Prime MInister Alfred Koch published an article concerning Mizulina's son that lives in Belgium and works for a large international law firm Mayer Brown, that sponsors pro-gay associations and organizations and is among the hundreds on pro-LGBT rights
544:
Come one, the first person who has discovered this information (Russian former Vice
Premier Minister Koch) was immediately accused in being part of "paedophile lobby" and underwent a gruelling (several hours!) interrogation by a unit of the Special Committee for Crimes of Extreme Importance! And the
406:
shows national bias. Also, the WP:UNDUE rule is entirely irrelevant to the issue, because it is a rule about the minority viewpoint, disputed by majority. The article under discussion is not presenting any viewpoints at all, only an important fact that Mayer Brown became notorious in a nation of 138
341:
Now the section with the LGBT controversy surrounding Mayer Brown was blanked with a comment "This section removed as it is an editorial opinion." Do I see a pattern here? The funny thing is that there is no opinion stated or implied about Mayer Brown in the section, except "allegedly supports LGBT
890:
Just had a thought, after
Legobot invited me here and I realized I'd already commented on the RfC. Should (or do) the protests have a page, perhaps closer to a stub? Could then simply link to it on this page with a one-sentence mention of the protests. That might solve both primary issues I've seen
757:
why we don't inflate "controversies" and put them where they don't belong. Infamy, like notability, is not supposed to be inherited. Knowledge (XXG) is not a platform for social change or commentary, and neither you nor
Tipareth have managed to provide evidence that the company has been in any way,
505:
And finally, could you please explicate your demand 'please either improve it, or keep it off'. Of course we could add tons of reference and quotations, because the stuff is huge in Russia. However, this would turn the little factoid of 200 words into a big section, possibly taking over half of the
477:
There is nothing that implicates Mayer Brown in the information that this company became notorious in Russia due to the fascist laws passed by its employee's relative. However, it is remarkable that 'Mayer Brown obviously believes that this information implicates the firm'. Indeed, the efforts that
873:
It is interesting enough that activization of demonstrations and pickets against Mayer Brown would bring a
Knowledge (XXG) editor demanding removal of information about these demonstrations. Now the issue of LGBT persecution is not contained in Russia anymore: it seems that activists are picketing
448:
or refrain from making them altogether. I did not remove the paragraph because they asked us to, I removed it because it's offtopic, a coatrack and undue weight. Third, this is not something that the company did or didn't do directly, and one employee being tangentially associated with a political
268:
Tiphareth, Apologies for removing your text without explanation. Here was my thinking: The “Controversy in Russia” text seems tangential to the topic “Mayer Brown.” Since the apparent controversy has more to do with Yelena
Mizulina than with this law firm, perhaps it would be more appropriate to
163:
Rule 18 states Knowledge (XXG) entries are not to be "A vehicle for advertising. Do not make an article on an item just because you work for a company that makes it, or you make it yourself. You can link to a page about a company if it is to show what companies are important in certain topics. See
286:
This factoid is present in Yelena Mizulina article, but it is directly related to Mayer Brown. Also, this article reads now as an advertisement, as if it was written by Mayer Brown employees. There are apparently many controversies surrounding this establishment, omitted from this article because
519:
If you think anyone wishes to implicate Mayer Brown and fails, you are wrong: there is no wish, explicit or implicit, to implicate Mayer Brown, in ties with Russian fascist politicians. There are just no reliable sources which implicate Mayer Brown. Of course, their own concern to whitewash the
574:
Upon your request, added a more sources and a bit of development (a human rights defense organization called "Spectrum" is actively pursuing Mayer Brown right now with pickets; they are also writing open letters demanding Mayer Brown's response to Mizulina's son alleged homophobia). Since the
944:
I went through some of the sources provided. Most of them are attacks on the politician, using her son to shame her. They are completely irrelevant to Mayer Brown the company. Mayer Brown does not even operate in Russia, and has never (as far as I can tell) even commented on this supposed
652:, a Russian politician, who happens to work for the company that is the subject of the article. Part of the controversy is that the firm is allegedly LGBT-friendly, yet employs this person who is allegedly LGBT-hostile and whose mother is at the forefront of anti-LGBT activity in Russia.
407:
million people because of anti-gay controversy. I suspect that this level of fame is not reached neither by Mayer Brown elsewhere in the world nor, possibly, by any other lawyer firm in history, hence this controversy is in fact more important than any other issue raised in the article.
309:
Mayer Brown provided counsel for the plaintiffs in the case that overturned Wisconsin's gay marriage ban. They're not anti-LGBT. One of their partners is well-known for being the gay clerk to Supreme Court Justice Powell when he cast the deciding vote to uphold sodomy laws.
545:
guy (Koch) is still huge in Russian politics, still millionaire and writing best-selling books every year or so! Obviously this news is important, heck, is is probably the most notable piece of information about Mayer Brown *ever*. There is *nothing* to discuss here.
676:
through Google shows a report on a series of rather snide Facebook posts and tweets about Mizulina and her son. All this is well and good, but ultimately it belongs in the Mizulina biography, not in the Mayer Brown article, which doesn't even operate in Russia.
421:
And, by the way, it is entirely expected that (due to the level of attention that Mayer Brown employees already put to this Knowledge (XXG) page) that at some point they would hire paid editors, claiming to be unrelated to Mayer Brown, to censor this article.
287:
they are not enough documented. The LGBT issue is, fortunately, well documented, and it is probably the single most notable bit of information related to Mayer Brown. Hence its removal can be understood as an act of censorship and whitewashing.
845:
by an employee of the company, who complained that the material has nothing to do with the company. I agreed, and removed the paragraph, after which the above discussion ensued. I do not believe taking this to DRN would be productive given
478:
its employees dedicated to removing this little factoid are astounding. I guess there is something fishy (and implicating Mayer Brown) in this, but I have no idea what, in fact, the more I research the more evidence of censorship I find.
1143:
559:
Adding more sources will not increase the relative size of the paragraph, thus not affecting the (current) weight. I suggest you add more, Russian or otherwise, in the next few days before I call an RFC.
796:. There are human right activists boycotting Mayer Brown because of the LGBT controversy. Removal of the section would amount to censorship of their campaign. The issue is clearly relevant (it is about
1012:
If a former vice-PM takes uses his media platform to denounce a company, that is very much to do with the company. If it is reported in reliable secondary sources, then it belongs in the article. --
732:
with its inclusion, and the section does apply to the company even if it's not representative of the entire company. That's often what happens when negative news is attached to an entity/person.
672:
attempting to attack Mizulina by claiming hypocrisy since her son lives and works in societies (Belgium and the UK) where LGBT people have much more freedom and security. For example, running
440:
complaining that the material has no place in the article. But that's no different than if I had run into it myself, or someone reported it to the NPOV board or anywhere else. If you have
622:. The arguments below that the majority of the content has to do with the mother are very strong. no prejudice or comment about if the content is appropriate on the politician's article.
365:
This is the IP of an anonymous editor who is making changes to this article trying to remove the LGBT controversy. Also, the 82.179.218.138 comment above was mine, I forget to login.
728:. It's relevant to a larger, national controversy that's going on in Russia right now, and there have been multiple responses from people because of it. I see no issue with
985:
organizations in Belgium, whilst his mother is waging war on homosexuality in Russia. In response to this, Mizulina accused Koch of being a member of a "pedophile lobby".
388:
for an issue about which the company is not otherwise known for. I suggest you add this to some LGBT-related article instead, if there is one where it won't be offtopic.
170:
This article does not mention significant negative public information, such as securities fraud litigation against the firm and the federal indictment of a partner.
254:
A well-sourced and notable factoid about Mayer Brown role in the ongoing campaing against LGBT rights in Russia was deleted without reason; I reverted the deletion.
492:
far-reaching efforts to conceal the ties to the Russian fascist politician, one can be sure that at some point they would hire someone to whitewash their page.
436:
First, please don't accuse me of bias when you have no reason or evidence to do so. Second, I was alerted to this by an employee of the company, who wrote to
1174:
129:
1136:
135:
653:
506:
article. This *would* make a little cute factoid into something where you can apply "undue weight" and "coatracking"! I don't think this is a good idea.
842:
662:
Mr. Nikolay Mizulin made homophobic statements on his Facebook account that were quickly deleted after his employment with Mayer Brown was publicized
193:
The article has been "fixed"; advertising elements removed (the article is down to a stub in fact) but there are sources showing notability. --
1179:
1024:
920:
343:
953:
A link from the politician's bio to here mentioning the controversy would be OK I guess, my objection is to three paragraphs of material
317:
380:
I'm not related to Mayer Brown, and I removed the paragraph. The material is irrelevant at best to the topic as a whole, it represents
1169:
1057:
You removed the practice list and commented it was "unsourced brochure advertising." If I were to link it to the practice list on
987:
It's fairly obvious that this has nothing to do with Mayer Brown, bombastic claims by Tipareth and his friends notwithstanding.
95:
58:
1077:
33:
643:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1045:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
167:
This entry appears to have been written by Mayer Brown employees and copies major portions of the Mayer Brown website.
1151:
945:
controversy. Keep in mind I don't read Russian, so my method consists of running the sources through Google Translate.
852:
this is is probably the most notable piece of information about Mayer Brown *ever*. There is *nothing* to discuss here.
174:
171:
784:
1020:
916:
105:
240:
1093:
347:
269:
place the text within the “Yelena Mizulina" article, perhaps under the “Position on LGBT” section. "Allefe79"
39:
1132:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
957:
that places the company in a negative light when they have (as far as I can tell so far) done nothing wrong.
321:
1147:
1104:
of information. If there aren't such sources available for particular bits of info, that probably means its
1101:
1097:
1065:
313:
1092:
That would make it somewhat sourced, but it would still be advertising. Knowledge (XXG) strongly prefers
1089:
236:
183:
822:
780:
274:
648:
This section covers an alleged controversy related to alleged homophobic statements made by the son of
385:
1013:
939:
909:
1069:
679:
Proposal: Remove the "Controversy in Russia" section, merge whatever material is appropriate to the
356:
I think it is worth the effort to quote the relevant bits from the whois database, for the history.
179:
21:
1073:
879:
805:
580:
550:
525:
468:
427:
412:
370:
292:
270:
259:
1117:
1007:
990:
960:
896:
857:
761:
737:
714:
691:
627:
563:
452:
391:
219:
684:
607:
445:
403:
381:
729:
437:
818:
214:
agreed. Notability seems established and the article could even stand a little more detail.
1109:
1105:
619:
615:
614:. !votes are obviously very close, but the Spectrum Human Rights Allaince appears to be an
70:
52:
979:
800:
s position on the LGBT issue) and notable (there are literally hundreds of news sources).
680:
649:
206:
657:
611:
463:
We might also add information about this censorship to the article. Isn't it relevant? --
875:
847:
801:
576:
546:
521:
464:
423:
408:
366:
288:
255:
86:
673:
1163:
1128:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
1113:
948:
892:
733:
623:
215:
402:
This issue was really huge in Russia (see the reference attached), hence your claim
175:
http://abajournal.com/news/mayer_brown_partner_sued_and_charged_by_sec_in_refco_case
172:
http://abajournal.com/news/refco_trustee_seeks_2_billion_from_mayer_brown_others/
669:
360:
158:
195:
76:
758:
shape or form involved in all this, other than employing the woman's son.
1058:
817:. Off topic. This is not a notable campaign. No reliable news sources.
101:
157:
This entry apparently violates What Knowledge (XXG) is not Rule 18.
444:
of your allegations of paid editing, you should either bring them to
1155:
1121:
1081:
1029:
996:
966:
925:
900:
883:
863:
826:
809:
788:
767:
741:
720:
697:
631:
584:
569:
554:
529:
472:
458:
431:
416:
397:
374:
351:
325:
296:
278:
263:
244:
232:
Added a paragraph regarding Meyer Brown's role in Refco bankruptcy.
223:
209:
187:
1050:
question for Gaijin42 re. removal of "main areas of practice" list
153:
This entry apparently violates What Knowledge (XXG) is not Rule 18
15:
159:
http://simple.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not
841:
It should be disclosed that I was made aware of this via
100:, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
618:
and therefore cannot be used to make statements about a
599:
RfC: Is the "Controversy in Russia" section appropriate?
1112:
since I have a suspicion that may be in play for you.
982:
article, where the controversy is stated as follows:
660:
to begin with) for example summarizes it as follows:
164:
Knowledge (XXG):articles on commercial enterprises."
362:
OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/MCS7-ARIN
384:in relation to the rest of the article, and it's a
1108:encyclopedic. Also, you should probably look into
134:This article has not yet received a rating on the
753:You seem to be making my point for me - that's
1142:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
779:. This has nothing to do with the law firm.
668:. Rather, the "controversy" seems to be with
8:
47:
1137:HKU 20200604 DSC01920 (49969869302).jpg
49:
19:
7:
639:The following discussion is closed.
92:This article is within the scope of
1175:Unknown-importance Chicago articles
114:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Chicago
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
1041:The discussion above is closed.
891:raised in comments on this RfC.
79:
69:
51:
20:
656:in English (which might not be
1156:07:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
1:
1061:, would that be acceptable?
978:In fact I would point to the
884:08:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
864:20:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
827:20:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
810:15:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
789:05:43, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
742:20:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
721:20:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
698:20:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
570:15:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
555:20:44, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
530:20:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
473:06:52, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
459:00:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
432:08:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
417:07:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
398:21:59, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
1180:WikiProject Chicago articles
1030:00:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
997:23:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
967:23:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
926:16:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
768:23:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
632:00:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
585:09:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
375:17:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
352:17:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
297:06:41, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
279:21:30, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
245:20:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
117:Template:WikiProject Chicago
901:16:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
264:20:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
1196:
1096:sources not maintain both
136:project's importance scale
1122:21:13, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
1082:21:08, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
326:03:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
224:01:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
210:23:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
188:22:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
133:
106:Chicago metropolitan area
64:
46:
1170:C-Class Chicago articles
1059:mayerbrown.com's website
1043:Please do not modify it.
641:Please do not modify it.
28:This article is rated
711:, as RFC originator.
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
906:Clarification needed
871:Censorship in action
404:serious undue weight
382:serious undue weight
833:Threaded discussion
96:WikiProject Chicago
1148:Community Tech bot
642:
34:content assessment
1085:
1068:comment added by
1028:
924:
850:'s position that
640:
316:comment added by
150:
149:
146:
145:
142:
141:
1187:
1084:
1062:
1019:
1016:
1011:
995:
993:
965:
963:
952:
943:
915:
912:
862:
860:
781:NinjaRobotPirate
766:
764:
719:
717:
696:
694:
568:
566:
457:
455:
396:
394:
328:
204:
201:
198:
122:
121:
120:Chicago articles
118:
115:
112:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1160:
1159:
1144:nomination page
1130:
1063:
1052:
1047:
1046:
1014:
1005:
991:
988:
980:Yelena Mizulina
961:
958:
946:
940:BrownHairedGirl
937:
910:
858:
855:
835:
777:Support removal
762:
759:
715:
712:
709:Support removal
705:
692:
689:
681:Yelena Mizulina
650:Yelena Mizulina
645:
636:
635:
634:
601:
564:
561:
453:
450:
392:
389:
363:
339:
337:More censorship
311:
252:
202:
199:
196:
155:
119:
116:
113:
110:
109:
85:
80:
78:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1193:
1191:
1183:
1182:
1177:
1172:
1162:
1161:
1140:
1139:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1094:WP:INDEPENDENT
1090:User:Mcvicker6
1051:
1048:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1000:
999:
970:
969:
929:
928:
903:
887:
886:
867:
866:
848:User:Tiphareth
834:
831:
830:
829:
812:
794:Oppose removal
791:
773:
772:
771:
770:
745:
744:
726:Oppose removal
723:
704:
701:
646:
637:
605:
604:
603:
602:
600:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
475:
461:
419:
358:
344:82.179.218.138
338:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
302:
301:
300:
299:
251:
248:
237:Tristes tigres
234:
233:
229:
228:
227:
226:
154:
151:
148:
147:
144:
143:
140:
139:
132:
126:
125:
123:
91:
90:
87:Chicago portal
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1192:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1168:
1167:
1165:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1102:WP:NOTABILITY
1099:
1098:WP:NEUTRALITY
1095:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1060:
1055:
1054:Hi Gaijin42,
1049:
1044:
1031:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1009:
1008:FreeRangeFrog
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
998:
994:
992:FreeRangeFrog
986:
981:
977:
974:
973:
972:
971:
968:
964:
962:FreeRangeFrog
956:
950:
941:
936:
933:
932:
931:
930:
927:
922:
918:
914:
907:
904:
902:
898:
894:
889:
888:
885:
881:
877:
872:
869:
868:
865:
861:
859:FreeRangeFrog
853:
849:
844:
840:
837:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
816:
815:Speedy remove
813:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
792:
790:
786:
782:
778:
775:
774:
769:
765:
763:FreeRangeFrog
756:
752:
749:
748:
747:
746:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
724:
722:
718:
716:FreeRangeFrog
710:
707:
706:
702:
700:
699:
695:
693:FreeRangeFrog
688:
687:and offtopic.
686:
682:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
644:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
598:
586:
582:
578:
573:
572:
571:
567:
565:FreeRangeFrog
558:
557:
556:
552:
548:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
531:
527:
523:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
476:
474:
470:
466:
462:
460:
456:
454:FreeRangeFrog
447:
443:
439:
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
420:
418:
414:
410:
405:
401:
400:
399:
395:
393:FreeRangeFrog
387:
383:
379:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
361:
357:
354:
353:
349:
345:
336:
327:
323:
319:
318:98.207.51.108
315:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
298:
294:
290:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
276:
272:
266:
265:
261:
257:
249:
247:
246:
242:
238:
231:
230:
225:
221:
217:
213:
212:
211:
208:
207:
205:
192:
191:
190:
189:
185:
181:
177:
176:
173:
168:
165:
161:
160:
152:
137:
131:
128:
127:
124:
107:
103:
99:
98:
97:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1141:
1131:
1064:— Preceding
1056:
1053:
1042:
983:
975:
954:
934:
905:
870:
851:
838:
814:
798:Mayer Brown'
797:
793:
776:
754:
750:
725:
708:
685:undue weight
683:article, as
678:
665:
661:
647:
638:
441:
364:
355:
340:
312:— Preceding
267:
253:
235:
194:
178:
169:
166:
162:
156:
94:
93:
40:WikiProjects
819:Itsmejudith
670:Alfred Koch
654:This source
250:Censorship?
1164:Categories
1017:HairedGirl
913:HairedGirl
606:Closed as
1070:Mcvicker6
876:Tiphareth
802:Tiphareth
755:precisely
577:Tiphareth
547:Tiphareth
522:Tiphareth
465:alexandrz
424:Tiphareth
409:Tiphareth
367:Tiphareth
289:Tiphareth
256:Tiphareth
180:Wiki20067
1114:Gaijin42
1078:contribs
1066:unsigned
1025:contribs
949:GRUcrule
921:contribs
893:GRUcrule
734:GRUcrule
658:reliable
624:Gaijin42
608:WP:UNDUE
446:WP:COI/N
442:evidence
386:coatrack
314:unsigned
271:Allefe79
216:Ronnotel
976:Comment
935:Comment
839:Comment
751:Comment
730:WP:NPOV
610:due to
111:Chicago
104:or the
102:Chicago
59:Chicago
30:C-class
1110:WP:COI
1106:WP:NOT
1021:(talk)
917:(talk)
703:Survey
666:per se
620:WP:BLP
616:WP:SPS
36:scale.
1015:Brown
911:Brown
612:WP:RS
1152:talk
1118:talk
1100:and
1074:talk
955:here
897:talk
880:talk
843:OTRS
823:talk
806:talk
785:talk
738:talk
674:this
628:talk
581:talk
551:talk
526:talk
469:talk
438:OTRS
428:talk
413:talk
371:talk
348:talk
322:talk
293:talk
275:talk
260:talk
241:talk
220:talk
184:talk
1146:. —
1023:• (
919:• (
130:???
1166::
1154:)
1120:)
1080:)
1076:•
899:)
882:)
854:.
825:)
808:)
787:)
740:)
630:)
583:)
553:)
528:)
471:)
430:)
415:)
373:)
350:)
324:)
295:)
277:)
262:)
243:)
222:)
200:am
197:At
186:)
1150:(
1116:(
1072:(
1027:)
1010::
1006:@
989:§
959:§
951::
947:@
942::
938:@
923:)
895:(
878:(
856:§
821:(
804:(
783:(
760:§
736:(
713:§
690:§
626:(
579:(
562:§
549:(
524:(
467:(
451:§
426:(
411:(
390:§
369:(
346:(
320:(
291:(
273:(
258:(
239:(
218:(
203:a
182:(
138:.
108:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.