757:
appears in Volume 03, Number 09A of the
Journal of Modern Physics, which is a peer-reviewed journal. A 'peer-reviewed journal' in this case means that other physicists have debated on key issue, which also means that they have assessed each other's works somehow. On the same edition of the journal, there is another paper co-authored by Berman and the mathematician and philosopher Newton da Costa, an important thinker of the 20th and 21st centuries, already internationally acknowledged for his great contributions for mathematical thinking. For those who do not know who he is, there is an article on Newton da Costa in the Knowledge. Thus, Berman does not write papers alone, he works with other persons and is acknowledged by others, both his co-authors and referees of scientific journals and publishing houses.--
302:
1148:
publish papers, because the papers they submit must undergo a selection. It is expected that scientists write papers on the issues they investigate, but not every written paper is accepted for publication. And not every paper is cited. Getting citations is already not ordinary for most of the publications around the world. If you had any knowledge of the subject, you would know this: that most scientific books and scientific papers around the world are rarely cited if they are cited at all. Learn something about an issue before you write wrong things about it.--
1006:
repeating the same lies so that others can argue with you seriously. Secondly, it is clear that you cannot understand the papers that cite him, you have no idea of what the issues mean, otherwise you would not make such request as a paper declaring someone a great scientist. In science, the merit of the scholars is acknowledged by acceptance of their works for publication and by serious discussion of what they propose. The cult of personality is not the way to show that you hold a scientist in high regard. --
1133:. And as explained before, an academic publishing papers is expected and other academics will cite them - either to back up their own arguments, to show they have actually researched the existing literature or even if they are dismissing them. This is business as usual in academia and does not in itself mean that the individuals involved have an "outstanding impact". We need references about Berman, not links to his papers. And, each of the papers above have a few cites but none of them has a lot.
237:
292:
265:
175:
151:
120:
1482:
Hugo Kremer) when I went to research but about who Hugo Kremer was I found out that he was one of the greatest theoretical physicists of his time and that he would become the Rector of the
Coordination of the Physics Course at the university. He had a great project for the development of Physics in Brazil, having done a Ph.D. abroad and being well recognized in the Academy of Physics.
49:
21:
185:
1553:
In this
Proceedings of the Judiciary Court of Santa Catarina (TJSC) cited that Berman would have bipolar affective disorder with psychotic symptoms, during the same time as the events here on Knowledge that are recorded on Talk, in this process in question he would have made a slanderous denunciation
1493:
However, in what
Marcelo Samuel Berman reported in the past through the history of the article here on Knowledge, and a YouTube channel that reported on Berman's life, he said that Kremer was a "Nazi" who had prejudices against Berman because he was Jewish, but the argument is controversial since the
948:
Now that is nonsense. You have not shown anything out of the ordinary that could not also be shown about hundreds of academics. A small number of cites for some papers dose not indicate significance, and claims made in this article in the past also seem to exaggerate his influence - and the claims of
771:
PS: In case of persistent doubts, check the list of 112 papers that have been examined and approved for publication in scientific journals. It is there. Anyone who doubts it, even though the evidences are herein presented, is either acting on bad faith, or is too mediocre to insist in an error or has
1505:
But in conclusion, Kremer's death caused irreparable damage to
National Physics, since Kremer, as one of the biggest names in Theoretical Physics in Brazil, had several contacts with promising physicists, both national and international, with his death several Physicists stopped teaching at UFPR and
1005:
First and foremost, I have presented many references that cite just one of his 112 papers. There are more references to the same paper. And each of his 112 papers has many references. If you insist in saying that the number of references is small, you insist in a mediocre lie. You have first to stop
786:
PS2: And for those who ask who else quotes Berman's papers, I give another example: his paper "Cosmological Models with
Constant Deceleration Parameter" is cited by physicists who investigate cosmology. Here are some (but not all) links where one can find works by other scientists that cite Berman's
495:
Your tag seems disruptive, since it is clearly a provocation. There is another article that links to this article, and your insistence in saying something false is the disruptive behavior and clearly seems that you have some problem with the cosmologist, who happens to be a Jew and a South
American.
1313:
Noq, please don't try to convince people of what is unconvincing. Indeed, looking back to the talk page you will the same guy of the Berman fighting the Berman of the article. And, I have edited this page, and I'm neither of the two editors you mentioned. Indeed, it is more likely that the same guy
1147:
Noq, first and foremost, there is no such a thing as "as you have explained". You haven't explained anything, because you don't know what you are talking about. Once you said something like "an academic publishing papers is expected", that is not true. It is neither easy nor usual for scientists to
967:
No, the nonsense is entirely yours. The number of citations is not small. And there are not hundreds of scholars who can achieve the same feats. There are not even 50 scholars experts in these fields who could write papers with the same impact. Very few physicists in the world have laws named after
1481:
I am a young
Brazilian who will start studying Physics at the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR) this year, I was very curious to discover that the Academic Center of Physics that would normally be named normal (CAFIS - Centro AcadĂŞmico de FĂsica) was in actually named as (CAHK - Centro AcadĂŞmico
1278:
To you, member of the Berman family: you have written that the
Knowledge is not a place for lies or for personal problems. Well, it is not a place for you to lie, neither to accuse anyone of absurd things nor to beat your parents, siblings, etc, on any personal grounds you have. Stop using several
1247:
There were other comments on personal attacks on this page, arguing that the converse is true: that it is the Albert Berman user that has personal reasons to attack
Marcelo Berman. Curiously, such posts have been deleted on the allegation that they were not relevant for the talk page. But then why
1065:
PS: Nowadays, we have the means to track the number of citations of one single author's papers. Here is the link for the statistics of citations of Berman and Gomide's paper, 'Cosmological models with constant deceleration parameter', which shows that the paper became more and more debated through
890:
Twenty papers citing his works! Notice that through the last link, which directs to the paper by Özgür Akarsu and Tekin Dereli, they mention Berman’s law, because that is the way his idea on the deceleration parameter is known currently in the scientific community. In fact, even some works that do
728:
The article has a number of general references to to shopping websites and the article looks like a CV. The source Ministry of Justice (www.mj.gov.br) Political Amnesty Comission (Process 2004.01.41822) does not meet any wiki standards. The CV used as a source is written by the author. Please see
393:
Again and again there are some false but recurrent accusations against this article. One recurrent false accusation is that it is an orphan article, meaning that it would have no links to other articles. This is completely false, as it does have many links to other articles. Unless, of course, one
1298:
pushing their opinion and being reverted by two editors with over 30,000 edits each - I think it unlikely that they are sockpuppets. The deleted edits were removed by an administrator - if you have a problem with the edits that have been removed then you will need to talk to the admin about that.
1279:
names to accomplish your personal goals against others. If you dislike any of your relatives, just forget him or her and go on with your own life, without using the wikipedia or the internet to harm other's feeling. Respect the great scientist that shares your surname, respect science, please. --
1274:
Curiously now, there is another individual (or the same under another alias) accusing me of disruptive behavior. The disruptive behavior is the behavior of my accuser and of the anti-Berman activist. Contents of the previous discussions being erased is the actual disruptive behavior and the false
756:
Marcelo Berman's papers have been selected and accepted for publication in scientific papers, as it is the case for any author who submits a paper for any scientific journal. One example is his paper co-authored by Fernando de Mello Gomide 'Relativistic Cosmology and the Pioneers Anomaly' which
650:
The answer to the question 'has anyone discussed Berman's work' is yeas. Below in this talk page we see the several references to scientific papers quoting him. Besides, self-publication is when the author is his the publisher of his own papers, which is not Berman's case. Again, you are using
524:
Indeed, the consensus has to exist, since the fact is evident: there is another article linking to this. To deny it is a disruptive behavior, unfair, impolite, irrational and stuborn. It seems that you have restored the tag acting in provocation or prejudice against a South American scientist.
1270:
If anyone checks the history of the talk page, he or she will see that there were several editions of the talk page which cannot be accessed anymore, for they have been completely erased. Some of these versions, for instance, mentioned the fact that there is a member of Berman's family who by
1501:
Personally this leads me to believe that it was Berman who started the whole fight in his relations, as we can see his personality in the history of this article, since he edited the articles himself using various sock puppets, always trying to cover this facts and promote his own work.
1485:
Kremer was so well regarded at the International Academy that he was even selected as an assistant to Professor Marie-Antoinette Tonnelat at the University of Paris. Through her relationship with Kremer, Marie-Antoinette and her other two assistants came to teach courses on relativity.
437:
Yes there is ONE article linking to it now, albeit a poor quality one and it was NOT a false accusation, as no other articles linked into this one, they linked out but not in. The orphan tag is not a badge of shame, it is intended to encourage others to link other articles to this
1114:
In sum, Berman's contributions to Physics since the early 1980's are of increasing acceptance in the academic and scientific community, as it is proven by quantified statistics, which definitely proves beyond reasonable doubt that he has an outstanding impact in his field of
1521:
Researching to see if Berman was still alive, I came across the following document from a court filing for Berman's "Wife" to receive Berman's death benefit. Since Brazil has a public pension known as INSS where if proven the wife of the deceased can receive the pension.
914:
As an academic he is expected to publish papers - this does not mean that the papers are widely accepted - and 20 cites is not a large number. The excessive weight being given to these papers and the tone used to describe them over emphasizes there importance.
949:
proving Hawkins theory does not seem to have gathered any significant amount of publicity which is strange in itself. The original claims of Hawkins acknowledging this have not been backed up and the huge additions about Bermans papers without independent
933:
Noq's comment above makes no sense at all. If just one of Berman's contributions is already known in the literature as Berman's law and many high level papers on the subject are published every year, then Berman is already influential and his works have
620:
The papers by Berman referred in this article are/ have been published by others, namely journals editors who have selected them. The accusation of self-publication is another false but recurrent accusation of those who want to vandalize this
1248:
would these accusations against Marcelo Berman be relevant? Why were they not deleted as well? It is clear that there is at least one person with highly biased attitudes towards Marcelo Berman who is doing these things on bad faith.--
1494:
person who called Berman to work at UFPR was Kremer. It was reported in the newspaper that Berman and Kremer argued and with that Kremer would have come to the conclusion that Berman was a "mental alien" unable to adapt to reality. (
891:
not cite Berman's paper directly, also attribute to him the discovery of such law as in the following passage: "We solve the above set of highly non-linear equations with the help of special law of variation of Hubble’s parameter,
480:
If you read the edit summary it explains "a single, relevant incoming link is sufficient to remove the tag, three or more is ideal" your removal appears disruptive and unhelpful and you seem to have ownership issues with the
1554:
that the Judge André Luiz Lopes de Souza would have murdered his own wife. Berman was found guilty but acquitted on grounds of mental insanity where he was placed in house arrest with medical supervision for over a year. (
59:
1597:
701:
I don't know if this should be considered settled. It's still an autobiographical article and according to Knowledge guidelines should be deleted. Leaving this page here is only encouraging further autobiographies.
586:
The article is indeed an orphan. Mr. "Waren Beat" went around Knowledge adding links to the Berman article. A former professor's page, a list of jews in Brazil, etc. This type os manipulation should not be allowed.
982:
Can you please provide some references to articles by other people that recognise Berman as such a great scientist? So far you have just presented a list of things written by him and a few references that cite him.
1506:
went to other universities over time where the damage was only recovered decades later. This SciELO article mentions the importance of Kremer and his very important contacts, which were lost with his death (
1592:
601:
On March 5th "Waren" added the first link to the article, and then added the comment in this section that indeed there was a link. Indeed. He added a few more since then, for good measure.
895:
that yields constant deceleration parameter models of the universe." (S.D. Katore, Bianchi Type-III Inflationary Universe with Constant Deceleration Parameter in General Relativity) Link:
1622:
31:
1271:
personal reasons have decided to attack the article. These comments showing the personal bias of Berman's opponent have been deleted and cannot be put back into this talk page.
246:
161:
1526:
99:
1627:
1602:
1049:
By no means the references are of poor quality. The physicist Marcelo Berman has been publishing articles in high quality and highly specialized scientific journals.--
1535:
In case the Administrators who see this message need more references such as newspapers to prove the facts, I will make them available in a next comment on the topic.
830:
553:
I have not attacked anyone, only stated necessary facts. But, suppose I did: then it is only the others who may attack me? Why can't I block others for vandalism?--
1090:
Another paper by Berman, 'Cosmological models with variable gravitational and cosmological “constants”', has also gained more and more citations through the years:
1420:
1416:
1402:
358:
1487:
1582:
370:
275:
104:
687:
This issue has been already settled, and there is no more deletion process of this article. The content above should not be part of the talk page anymore.--
1275:
accusations against me. These puppets accuse others of sock puppetry and of disruptive behavior, but it seems that those are precisely the things they do.
87:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
496:
Is it a problem for you that some South Americans have merit in science? Please, stop your disruptive behavior and stop accusing others of what you do.--
1226:
The attack has been repeated outside of Knowledge, on the authors with specific remarks on attempting alter his Knowledge page. I referred the page to
1095:
636:
The article needs sources which are NOT written by Berman, it needs reliable third party references. Has anyone apart from Berman discussed his work?
1617:
348:
1607:
1587:
203:
79:
953:- and not just directory listings but significant coverage is required - is undue weight. There is nothing here to show significant influence.
539:
Please assume good faith, building an encyclopedia is a collaborative effort and attacking other editors will only end with you being blocked.
301:
1632:
1612:
1527:
https://previdenciarista.com/trf4/pensao-por-morte-requisitos-comprovacao-de-uniao-estavel-2021-07-22-5077009-86-2019-4-04-7000-40002147779/
991:
are probably a good place to start reading about the sort of thing that is required. So far the article is lacking anything on those lines.
968:
them. And, please, improve your English, if you want to edit anything in the English Knowledge: your vocabulary and syntax are truncated. --
1173:
709:
207:
1495:
1513:
With such a remarkable event nationally and also in Berman's life, I can only believe that he should be mentioned on his Knowledge page.
1211:. My comments relate to the quality of the article and other editors have expressed similar remarks. See the article's revision history.
1034:
The article does not have a single reliable third party reference. 10 of the references are to his CV!! Others are his own publications.
1102:
That his papers are receiving more and more attention recently is also the case of 'A special law of variation for Hubble’s parameter':
324:
211:
1071:
202:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
831:
http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/25462570/cosmological-model-negative-constant-deceleration-parameter-brans-dicke-theory
673:
Given the problems of the article I think it is a case for deletion and I will put it for deletion if concerns are not addressed.
198:
156:
1107:
734:
1488:
http://memoria.bn.br/DocReader/DocReader.aspx?bib=830348&pesq=%22Hugo%20Kremer%22&hf=memoria.bn.br&pagfis=18805
315:
270:
131:
1083:
1555:
815:
1096:
http://libra.msra.cn/Publication/18705908/cosmological-models-with-variable-gravitational-and-cosmological-constants
984:
950:
825:
606:
592:
55:
27:
1419:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1563:
1543:
1368:
713:
119:
1234:
1216:
1189:
1177:
1039:
742:
730:
678:
641:
602:
588:
544:
486:
443:
414:
88:
1525:
According to the document, Berman would have died on 04/05/2019 (Day/Month/Year) dying at the age of 74. (
1458:
1438:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1426:
1340:
1230:
1212:
1185:
738:
674:
137:
1496:
http://memoria.bn.br/DocReader/DocReader.aspx?bib=800074&Pesq=%22Hugo%20Kremer%22&pagfis=119409
1559:
1539:
1393:
1319:
1315:
1284:
1280:
1253:
1249:
1153:
1149:
1120:
1116:
1054:
1050:
1011:
1007:
973:
969:
939:
935:
904:
900:
835:
777:
773:
762:
758:
705:
692:
688:
656:
652:
626:
622:
558:
554:
530:
526:
501:
497:
471:
467:
428:
424:
399:
395:
98:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
48:
20:
988:
1072:
http://libra.msra.cn/Publication/18705581/cosmological-models-with-constant-deceleration-parameter
323:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1507:
1204:
1181:
1035:
637:
540:
482:
439:
410:
102:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
1423:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
236:
1439:
1350:
885:
870:
865:
1454:
880:
190:
1446:
1108:
http://libra.msra.cn/Publication/48764993/a-special-law-of-variation-for-hubble-s-parameter
1078:
The same is attested for a more recent paper, 'The Pioneer anomaly and a Machian universe':
855:
840:
1372:
1358:
95:
845:
805:
1405:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
515:
457:
307:
1445:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1576:
1304:
1295:
1227:
1208:
1138:
1130:
996:
958:
920:
896:
875:
860:
795:
1084:
http://libra.msra.cn/Publication/12818619/the-pioneer-anomaly-and-a-machian-universe
820:
810:
800:
1556:
https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/tj-sc/944208492/inteiro-teor-944208563
1477:
Who was Hugo Kremer? And why his death caused immense damage to Physics in Brazil.
816:
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-97332006000700020
1172:
Apparently the author has had a problem with the article before. Please refer to
850:
1567:
1547:
1472:
Death of Marcelo Samuel Berman in 2019 and Assassination of Hugo Kremer in 1969.
1466:
1412:
1323:
1308:
1288:
1257:
1238:
1220:
1193:
1157:
1142:
1124:
1058:
1043:
1015:
1000:
977:
962:
943:
924:
908:
826:
http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/physics/issues/fiz-12-36-1/fiz-36-1-15-1102-4.pdf
781:
766:
746:
717:
696:
682:
660:
645:
630:
610:
596:
562:
548:
534:
519:
505:
490:
475:
461:
447:
432:
418:
403:
291:
264:
174:
150:
1411:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
297:
180:
510:
Indeed. I have restored the tag. There is no consensus to have it removed. -
1369:
http://web.archive.org/web/20131017195840/http://marcelosberman.org/data.htm
511:
453:
466:
Why did you restore the tag if it is not true that the article is orphan?--
1300:
1134:
992:
954:
916:
394:
irrational vandal decides to remove the links, which would be typpical.--
1355:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
790:
320:
1129:
But can you find somewhere a reference that says that otherwise it is
409:
The article is an orphan as no other wikipedia articles link to it?
210:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1363:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
836:
http://m-hikari.com/astp/astp2012/astp1-4-2012/ramASTP1-4-2012.pdf
787:
aforementioned paper listed in the bibliographical references.
1508:
https://www.scielo.br/j/man/a/95r8MfgYgmLWQkZLcfwHstB/?lang=en
113:
94:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
71:
43:
15:
1294:
Indeed looking at the talk page and article page will show a
1598:
Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
1378:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1266:
Vandalism and disruptive behavior of the anti-Berman puppets
235:
886:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10773-011-0941-5
871:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10773-008-9820-0
866:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-008-9844-1
881:
http://www.rrp.infim.ro/2011_63_2/24-Singh-Yadav-rps3.pdf
1339:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
856:
http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-006-9282-x
841:
http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-006-9210-0
1373:
http://www.marcelosberman.org/data.htm#1._GENERAL_DATA_
1344:
1593:
Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
846:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02813228
806:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02813228
319:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1415:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1168:
Knowledge is not a place for writing about yourself
897:http://www.bjp-bg.com/papers/bjp2011_2_139-144.pdf
876:http://www.ijsr.in/upload/1916737645Chapter_15.pdf
861:http://www.ias.ac.in/pramana/v72/p429/fulltext.pdf
796:http://www.ias.ac.in/pramana/v68/p707/fulltext.pdf
821:http://www.sbfisica.org.br/bjp/files/v36_1227.pdf
811:http://www.ijsr.in/upload/244727373Chapter_18.pdf
801:http://www.nipne.ro/rjp/2011_56_3-4/0616_0626.pdf
1623:Start-Class physics articles of Low-importance
1401:This message was posted before February 2018.
851:http://fizika.hfd.hr/fizika_b/bv09/b18p009.pdf
525:Please, respect the subject of the article!--
8:
117:
259:
145:
30:on 16 September 2012 (UTC). The result of
1314:has tried to revert the other editions.--
423:There are other articles linking to it.--
1628:Start-Class physics biographies articles
1603:Science and academia work group articles
261:
147:
1390:to let others know (documentation at
1203:I politely advise the author to read
7:
791:http://arxiv.org/pdf/1102.0915v3.pdf
313:This article is within the scope of
196:This article is within the scope of
1583:Biography articles of living people
1517:The death of Marcelo Samuel Berman.
247:the science and academia work group
136:It is of interest to the following
58:on 26 February 2016. The result of
772:not read the article completely.--
14:
1343:. Please take a moment to review
300:
290:
263:
183:
173:
149:
118:
77:This article must adhere to the
47:
19:
1618:Low-importance physics articles
353:This article has been rated as
220:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
54:This article was nominated for
26:This article was nominated for
1608:WikiProject Biography articles
1588:Start-Class biography articles
1199:Personal attacks by the author
735:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
651:recurrent false accusations.--
223:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1568:21:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
1548:20:42, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
1258:15:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
1239:12:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1221:05:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
1194:18:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
1044:18:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
1016:03:09, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
1001:17:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
978:16:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
963:15:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
944:15:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
925:11:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
909:04:09, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
782:03:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
767:03:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
747:18:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
683:19:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
368:This article is supported by
333:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics
327:and see a list of open tasks.
244:This article is supported by
80:biographies of living persons
1633:Physics biographies articles
1613:Start-Class physics articles
1324:16:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
1158:16:45, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
661:03:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
646:09:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
631:01:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
419:09:30, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
404:01:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
336:Template:WikiProject Physics
208:contribute to the discussion
1309:19:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
1289:01:58, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
1143:18:54, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
1125:01:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
1059:02:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
697:01:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
92:must be removed immediately
1649:
1432:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1361:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1336:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1174:Knowledge is not about YOU
752:Some sources and quotation
611:15:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
597:15:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
563:14:40, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
359:project's importance scale
1467:19:33, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
549:15:50, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
535:15:37, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
520:09:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
506:15:33, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
491:08:22, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
476:05:49, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
462:19:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
448:17:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
433:17:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
389:The Article is not orphan
367:
352:
285:
243:
168:
144:
1332:External links modified
1030:Poor quality references
731:Knowledge:Autobiography
718:17:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
1296:single purpose account
1209:Avoid Personal Remarks
452:I restored the tag. -
240:
126:This article is rated
1341:Marcelo Samuel Berman
371:Biographies Taskforce
239:
199:WikiProject Biography
1413:regular verification
1347:. If necessary, add
162:Science and Academia
1403:After February 2018
1382:parameter below to
985:WP:reliable sources
951:WP:reliable sources
893:proposed by Bermann
616:No Self-publication
316:WikiProject Physics
1408:InternetArchiveBot
1178:MarceloBerman talk
669:Case for deletion?
241:
226:biography articles
132:content assessment
1465:
1433:
708:comment added by
603:RodrigoalvesnetII
589:RodrigoalvesnetII
386:
385:
382:
381:
378:
377:
258:
257:
254:
253:
112:
111:
70:
69:
42:
41:
1640:
1461:
1460:Talk to my owner
1456:
1431:
1430:
1409:
1397:
1362:
1354:
1205:Personal attacks
724:Reliable sources
720:
341:
340:
339:physics articles
337:
334:
331:
310:
305:
304:
294:
287:
286:
281:
278:
267:
260:
228:
227:
224:
221:
218:
204:join the project
193:
191:Biography portal
188:
187:
186:
177:
170:
169:
164:
153:
146:
129:
123:
122:
114:
100:this noticeboard
72:
51:
44:
23:
16:
1648:
1647:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1573:
1572:
1560:EnryuuPendragon
1540:EnryuuPendragon
1474:
1464:
1459:
1424:
1417:have permission
1407:
1391:
1356:
1348:
1334:
1268:
1201:
1170:
1032:
934:repercussion.--
754:
726:
703:
671:
618:
391:
338:
335:
332:
329:
328:
306:
299:
279:
273:
225:
222:
219:
216:
215:
189:
184:
182:
159:
130:on Knowledge's
127:
12:
11:
5:
1646:
1644:
1636:
1635:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1615:
1610:
1605:
1600:
1595:
1590:
1585:
1575:
1574:
1571:
1570:
1473:
1470:
1457:
1451:
1450:
1443:
1376:
1375:
1367:Added archive
1333:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1267:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1242:
1241:
1200:
1197:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1111:
1110:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1068:
1067:
1062:
1061:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
965:
928:
927:
753:
750:
725:
722:
710:189.68.177.235
670:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
617:
614:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
508:
390:
387:
384:
383:
380:
379:
376:
375:
366:
363:
362:
355:Low-importance
351:
345:
344:
342:
325:the discussion
312:
311:
308:Physics portal
295:
283:
282:
280:Low‑importance
268:
256:
255:
252:
251:
242:
232:
231:
229:
195:
194:
178:
166:
165:
154:
142:
141:
135:
124:
110:
109:
105:this help page
89:poorly sourced
75:
68:
67:
60:the discussion
52:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1645:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1616:
1614:
1611:
1609:
1606:
1604:
1601:
1599:
1596:
1594:
1591:
1589:
1586:
1584:
1581:
1580:
1578:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1530:
1528:
1523:
1519:
1518:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1503:
1499:
1497:
1491:
1489:
1483:
1479:
1478:
1471:
1469:
1468:
1462:
1455:
1448:
1444:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1428:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1404:
1399:
1395:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1352:
1346:
1342:
1337:
1331:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1276:
1272:
1265:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1231:Albertlberman
1229:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1213:Albertlberman
1210:
1206:
1198:
1196:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1186:Albertlberman
1183:
1182:Msberman talk
1179:
1175:
1167:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1113:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1089:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1064:
1063:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1036:Theroadislong
1029:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1004:
1003:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
981:
980:
979:
975:
971:
966:
964:
960:
956:
952:
947:
946:
945:
941:
937:
932:
931:
930:
929:
926:
922:
918:
913:
912:
911:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
888:
887:
883:
882:
878:
877:
873:
872:
868:
867:
863:
862:
858:
857:
853:
852:
848:
847:
843:
842:
838:
837:
833:
832:
828:
827:
823:
822:
818:
817:
813:
812:
808:
807:
803:
802:
798:
797:
793:
792:
788:
784:
783:
779:
775:
769:
768:
764:
760:
751:
749:
748:
744:
740:
739:Albertlberman
736:
732:
723:
721:
719:
715:
711:
707:
699:
698:
694:
690:
685:
684:
680:
676:
675:Albertlberman
668:
662:
658:
654:
649:
648:
647:
643:
639:
638:Theroadislong
635:
634:
633:
632:
628:
624:
615:
613:
612:
608:
604:
599:
598:
594:
590:
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:
550:
546:
542:
541:Theroadislong
538:
537:
536:
532:
528:
523:
522:
521:
517:
513:
509:
507:
503:
499:
494:
493:
492:
488:
484:
483:Theroadislong
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:
449:
445:
441:
440:Theroadislong
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
411:Theroadislong
408:
407:
406:
405:
401:
397:
388:
373:
372:
365:
364:
360:
356:
350:
347:
346:
343:
326:
322:
318:
317:
309:
303:
298:
296:
293:
289:
288:
284:
277:
272:
269:
266:
262:
249:
248:
238:
234:
233:
230:
213:
212:documentation
209:
205:
201:
200:
192:
181:
179:
176:
172:
171:
167:
163:
158:
155:
152:
148:
143:
139:
133:
125:
121:
116:
115:
107:
106:
101:
97:
93:
90:
86:
82:
81:
76:
74:
73:
65:
61:
57:
53:
50:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1515:
1512:
1504:
1500:
1492:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1475:
1452:
1427:source check
1406:
1400:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1377:
1338:
1335:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1202:
1171:
1033:
989:WP:ACADEMICS
892:
889:
884:
879:
874:
869:
864:
859:
854:
849:
844:
839:
834:
829:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
785:
770:
755:
727:
704:— Preceding
700:
686:
672:
619:
600:
585:
392:
369:
354:
314:
245:
197:
138:WikiProjects
103:
91:
84:
78:
63:
36:No consensus
35:
1394:Sourcecheck
1115:research.--
276:Biographies
128:Start-class
1577:Categories
1316:Waren Beat
1281:Waren Beat
1250:Waren Beat
1150:Waren Beat
1117:Waren Beat
1066:the years:
1051:Waren Beat
1008:Waren Beat
970:Waren Beat
936:Waren Beat
901:Waren Beat
774:Waren Beat
759:Waren Beat
689:Waren Beat
653:Waren Beat
623:Waren Beat
621:article.--
555:Waren Beat
527:Waren Beat
498:Waren Beat
468:Waren Beat
425:Waren Beat
396:Waren Beat
1447:this tool
1440:this tool
1131:synthesis
217:Biography
157:Biography
96:libellous
1453:Cheers.—
1351:cbignore
706:unsigned
481:article.
56:deletion
28:deletion
1463::Online
1380:checked
1345:my edit
357:on the
330:Physics
321:Physics
271:Physics
1388:failed
1359:nobots
1228:WP:DRN
987:, and
134:scale.
1564:talk
1544:talk
1384:true
1320:talk
1305:talk
1285:talk
1254:talk
1235:talk
1217:talk
1207:and
1190:talk
1180:and
1154:talk
1139:talk
1121:talk
1055:talk
1040:talk
1012:talk
997:talk
974:talk
959:talk
940:talk
921:talk
905:talk
778:talk
763:talk
743:talk
733:and
714:talk
693:talk
679:talk
657:talk
642:talk
627:talk
607:talk
593:talk
559:talk
545:talk
531:talk
516:talk
512:DVdm
502:talk
487:talk
472:talk
458:talk
454:DVdm
444:talk
438:one.
429:talk
415:talk
400:talk
206:and
64:keep
62:was
34:was
1510:).
1421:RfC
1398:).
1386:or
1371:to
1301:noq
1135:noq
993:noq
955:noq
917:noq
349:Low
85:BLP
1579::
1566:)
1558:)
1546:)
1529:)
1498:)
1490:)
1434:.
1429:}}
1425:{{
1396:}}
1392:{{
1357:{{
1353:}}
1349:{{
1322:)
1307:)
1287:)
1256:)
1237:)
1219:)
1192:)
1184:.
1176:,
1156:)
1141:)
1123:)
1057:)
1042:)
1014:)
999:)
976:)
961:)
942:)
923:)
907:)
899:--
780:)
765:)
745:)
737:.
716:)
695:)
681:)
659:)
644:)
629:)
609:)
595:)
561:)
547:)
533:)
518:)
504:)
489:)
474:)
460:)
446:)
431:)
417:)
402:)
274::
160::
1562:(
1542:(
1486:(
1449:.
1442:.
1318:(
1303:(
1283:(
1252:(
1233:(
1215:(
1188:(
1152:(
1137:(
1119:(
1053:(
1038:(
1010:(
995:(
972:(
957:(
938:(
919:(
903:(
776:(
761:(
741:(
712:(
691:(
677:(
655:(
640:(
625:(
605:(
591:(
557:(
543:(
529:(
514:(
500:(
485:(
470:(
456:(
442:(
427:(
413:(
398:(
374:.
361:.
250:.
214:.
140::
108:.
83:(
66:.
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
