Knowledge

Talk:Maroon Creek Bridge

Source đź“ť

392: 497: 470: 507: 241: 220: 600: 612: 79: 21: 96: 382: 361: 148: 127: 255: 691:
Maybe I should have qualified it with "in Aspen" as the depots have been torn down. Down the valley, the rights-of-way are left, yes, but not in their entirety. Some portions have been paved over for use as streets or roads; in many cases they're growing over and haven't been used for bike trails or
683:
The article claims the bridge is the only significant remnant of sevice to Aspen. What is the support for this? The right-of-way can be traced most of the way. And did you really mean to imply that I-70 had something to do with the end of passenger service to Aspen? And what does service on the Rio
699:
Schwieterman does suggest that the completion of I-70 took some of the remaining passenger traffic from the railroad, traffic which might have then gone to Aspen from Glenwood Springs. Certainly the completion of paralleling interstate routes elsewhere in the country did not do the railroads any
703:
My understanding of the sources is that the Rio Grande effectively owned the Midland after it went under in the late 1890s, so it did use the bridge for some time afterwards. I do plead some greater ignorance of Colorado railroading history as to how accurate an impression this is.
806:
Regardless of what the DYK said, the article should be corrected. The former Aspen CM depot is now part of a building in the Aspen Area Business Center, and the better-preserved depot at Aspen Junction (now Basalt) is still in use, as a bank.
1066: 721:
The book says the bridge is a relic. It does not say it was the only one. I-70 had not been built in the area when the D&RG quit freight service to Aspen in 1969. Passenger service by rail had already been terminated by then.
784:
Significant is sort of a value judgement, a way of saying "visible". When rights-of-way are paved over (as they often are) they're not really that significant anymore. But a bridge you still notice (To be honest, that wasn't
759:
The book. Is a good source, but never says that the bridge is the only significant remnant. And the CM went out of service and its ROW was sold to the state. Highway 82 is constructed on it (and not just at the bridge).
1061: 452: 442: 927: 418: 1056: 696:
some stretches of track that have been kept in case they can be used for light rail. But with the depots torn down, the bridge is probably the most visible remnant of the railroads in Aspen itself.
405: 366: 1081: 537: 71: 202: 828:
I think I read somewhere that part of the story of the bridge is how quickly it was built in the dead of winter once the materials arrived. I can't locate where I saw that.
928:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120913170043/http://www.indenvertimes.com/cdot-replacement-of-1888-maroon-creek-bridge-in-aspen-wins-national-award-of-excellence-2/?refresh=1
907: 1031: 554: 192: 1036: 1046: 931: 333: 1076: 959: 955: 941: 590: 580: 168: 1101: 1026: 544: 397: 1091: 155: 132: 1041: 1021: 549: 917: 1071: 343: 67: 1096: 789:
first choice for the DYK hook, because I wasn't entirely sure it couldn't be proved wrong ... I would have preferred either of the other two).
630: 1051: 835: 767: 729: 414: 908:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110709131943/http://www.aspenhistorysociety.com/documents/GrowthManagementinAspenCO1960to1977searchable.pdf
655: 520: 475: 1086: 532: 937:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
305: 301: 932:
http://www.indenvertimes.com/cdot-replacement-of-1888-maroon-creek-bridge-in-aspen-wins-national-award-of-excellence-2/?refresh=1
911: 660: 624: 480: 528:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1002: 297: 288: 225: 107: 897: 274: 958:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
918:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070926230100/http://www.aspentimes.com/article/20041119/NEWS/111190006/0/FRONTPAGE
839: 771: 733: 993: 889: 977:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
965: 921: 858: 816: 794: 749: 709: 113: 36: 888:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 831: 763: 725: 512: 95: 881: 52: 417:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
167:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
744:
That's why we used "significant". Wasn't clear as to the I-70 timeline; will edit appropriately.
962:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
496: 469: 20: 978: 912:
http://www.aspenhistorysociety.com/documents/GrowthManagementinAspenCO1960to1977searchable.pdf
651: 854: 812: 790: 745: 705: 985: 617: 60: 944:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 293: 984:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
240: 219: 41: 1015: 849:
It's mentioned in the railroad MPS. Some other website, not one we can use a source,
688:
A lot of that is based on how Schwieterman tends to describe things. Point by point:
635: 525: 410: 309: 264: 825:
That's certainly true in the Aspen area-- at least it's the largest structure left.
898:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090114235530/http://www.dot.state.co.us/marooncreek/
951: 599: 1007: 950:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 862: 843: 820: 798: 775: 753: 737: 713: 607: 502: 387: 31: 524:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 901: 638: 1067:
C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
381: 360: 922:
http://www.aspentimes.com/article/20041119/NEWS/111190006/0/FRONTPAGE
164: 160: 254: 59:
is the only significant remnant of two rail lines that once served
684:
Grande have to do with this bridge, used by a different railroad?
296:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
147: 126: 89: 15: 1062:
Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
598: 292:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 77: 892:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
853:
note how quickly it was built considering the conditions.
427:
Knowledge:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
300:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 430:
Template:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
409:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. 885: 70:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 1057:
C-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
72:
Template:Did you know nominations/Maroon Creek Bridge
159:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 954:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 629:, our collaboration to improve, create, and update 1082:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance 811:I changed "only significant" to "most visible". 650:For questions about, or to make suggestions for 406:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places 940:This message was posted before February 2018. 433:National Register of Historic Places articles 8: 398:National Register of Historic Places portal 644:To comment about this article, select the 464: 355: 214: 121: 1032:Low-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles 880:I have just modified 4 external links on 177:Knowledge:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels 44:). The text of the entry was as follows: 1037:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels articles 180:Template:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels 902:http://www.dot.state.co.us/marooncreek/ 466: 357: 216: 123: 93: 68:Knowledge:Recent additions/2011/October 1047:Mid-importance rail transport articles 1077:Low-importance United States articles 66:A record of the entry may be seen at 7: 518:This article is within the scope of 424:National Register of Historic Places 415:National Register of Historic Places 403:This article is within the scope of 367:National Register of Historic Places 286:This article is within the scope of 153:This article is within the scope of 565:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 112:It is of interest to the following 1102:WikiProject United States articles 1027:C-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles 568:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 884:. Please take a moment to review 78: 1092:Low-importance Colorado articles 610: 505: 495: 468: 390: 380: 359: 253: 239: 218: 146: 125: 94: 19: 1042:C-Class rail transport articles 1022:Knowledge Did you know articles 585:This article has been rated as 447:This article has been rated as 338:This article has been rated as 197:This article has been rated as 156:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels 1072:C-Class United States articles 1: 1097:WikiProject Colorado articles 623:This article is supported by 421:and see a list of open tasks. 306:WikiProject Trains to do list 171:and see a list of open tasks. 1052:All WikiProject Trains pages 863:02:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC) 844:20:24, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 821:05:22, 17 October 2011 (UTC) 318:Knowledge:WikiProject Trains 799:15:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 776:13:28, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 754:04:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 738:02:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 714:01:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 321:Template:WikiProject Trains 1118: 971:(last update: 5 June 2024) 877:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 692:anything like that. There 679:only significant remnant?? 591:project's importance scale 453:project's importance scale 344:project's importance scale 203:project's importance scale 183:Bridge and Tunnel articles 40:column on 1 October 2011 ( 1087:C-Class Colorado articles 606: 584: 521:WikiProject United States 490: 446: 375: 337: 234: 196: 141: 120: 1008:22:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC) 661:We invite you to join us 526:United States of America 30:appeared on Knowledge's 873:External links modified 324:rail transport articles 603: 571:United States articles 102:This article is rated 83: 602: 81: 952:regular verification 626:WikiProject Colorado 513:United States portal 942:After February 2018 882:Maroon Creek Bridge 656:project's talk page 539:Articles Requested! 280:September 25, 2012 174:Bridges and Tunnels 133:Bridges and Tunnels 53:Maroon Creek Bridge 28:Maroon Creek Bridge 996:InternetArchiveBot 947:InternetArchiveBot 631:Knowledge articles 604: 289:WikiProject Trains 108:content assessment 84: 972: 834:comment added by 766:comment added by 728:comment added by 676: 675: 672: 671: 668: 667: 652:Colorado articles 639:State of Colorado 463: 462: 459: 458: 354: 353: 350: 349: 284: 283: 213: 212: 209: 208: 88: 87: 1109: 1006: 997: 970: 969: 948: 846: 778: 740: 664: 647: 642: 620: 615: 614: 613: 573: 572: 569: 566: 563: 515: 510: 509: 508: 499: 492: 491: 486: 483: 472: 465: 435: 434: 431: 428: 425: 400: 395: 394: 393: 384: 377: 376: 371: 363: 356: 326: 325: 322: 319: 316: 257: 248: 247: 243: 236: 235: 230: 222: 215: 185: 184: 181: 178: 175: 150: 143: 142: 137: 129: 122: 105: 99: 98: 90: 80: 23: 16: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1012: 1011: 1000: 995: 963: 956:have permission 946: 890:this simple FaQ 875: 836:174.253.146.148 829: 768:174.253.140.126 761: 730:174.253.136.128 723: 681: 659: 645: 634: 618:Colorado portal 616: 611: 609: 570: 567: 564: 561: 560: 559: 545:Become a Member 511: 506: 504: 484: 478: 432: 429: 426: 423: 422: 396: 391: 389: 369: 323: 320: 317: 314: 313: 285: 259: 258: 228: 182: 179: 176: 173: 172: 135: 106:on Knowledge's 103: 61:Aspen, Colorado 12: 11: 5: 1115: 1113: 1105: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1029: 1024: 1014: 1013: 990: 989: 982: 935: 934: 926:Added archive 924: 916:Added archive 914: 906:Added archive 904: 896:Added archive 874: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 826: 804: 803: 802: 801: 757: 756: 719: 718: 717: 716: 701: 697: 680: 677: 674: 673: 670: 669: 666: 665: 649: 643: 622: 621: 605: 595: 594: 587:Low-importance 583: 577: 576: 574: 558: 557: 552: 547: 542: 535: 533:Template Usage 529: 517: 516: 500: 488: 487: 485:Low‑importance 473: 461: 460: 457: 456: 449:Low-importance 445: 439: 438: 436: 419:the discussion 413:listed on the 411:historic sites 402: 401: 385: 373: 372: 370:Low‑importance 364: 352: 351: 348: 347: 340:Mid-importance 336: 330: 329: 327: 294:rail transport 282: 281: 278: 270: 269: 260: 252: 251: 246: 244: 232: 231: 229:Mid‑importance 223: 211: 210: 207: 206: 199:Low-importance 195: 189: 188: 186: 169:the discussion 151: 139: 138: 136:Low‑importance 130: 118: 117: 111: 100: 86: 85: 75: 65: 64: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1114: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1085: 1083: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1019: 1017: 1010: 1009: 1004: 999: 998: 987: 983: 980: 976: 975: 974: 967: 961: 957: 953: 949: 943: 938: 933: 929: 925: 923: 919: 915: 913: 909: 905: 903: 899: 895: 894: 893: 891: 887: 883: 878: 872: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 847: 845: 841: 837: 833: 827: 824: 823: 822: 818: 814: 810: 809: 808: 800: 796: 792: 788: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 777: 773: 769: 765: 755: 751: 747: 743: 742: 741: 739: 735: 731: 727: 715: 711: 707: 702: 698: 695: 690: 689: 687: 686: 685: 678: 662: 657: 653: 640: 637: 632: 628: 627: 619: 608: 601: 597: 596: 592: 588: 582: 579: 578: 575: 562:United States 556: 553: 551: 548: 546: 543: 541: 540: 536: 534: 531: 530: 527: 523: 522: 514: 503: 501: 498: 494: 493: 489: 482: 477: 476:United States 474: 471: 467: 454: 450: 444: 441: 440: 437: 420: 416: 412: 408: 407: 399: 388: 386: 383: 379: 378: 374: 368: 365: 362: 358: 345: 341: 335: 332: 331: 328: 311: 310:Trains Portal 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 290: 279: 277: 276: 272: 271: 268: 267: 266: 265:Trains Portal 261: 256: 250: 249: 245: 242: 238: 237: 233: 227: 224: 221: 217: 204: 200: 194: 191: 190: 187: 170: 166: 162: 158: 157: 152: 149: 145: 144: 140: 134: 131: 128: 124: 119: 115: 109: 101: 97: 92: 91: 76: 73: 69: 62: 58: 55: 54: 50:... that the 49: 46: 45: 43: 39: 38: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 994: 991: 966:source check 945: 939: 936: 879: 876: 850: 830:— Preceding 805: 786: 762:— Preceding 758: 724:— Preceding 720: 693: 682: 654:, go to our 625: 586: 550:Project Talk 538: 519: 448: 404: 339: 304:. See also: 298:project page 287: 273: 263: 262: 198: 154: 114:WikiProjects 56: 51: 48:Did you know 47: 37:Did you know 35: 27: 26:A fact from 855:Daniel Case 813:Daniel Case 791:Daniel Case 746:Daniel Case 706:Daniel Case 646:New section 42:check views 1016:Categories 1003:Report bug 648:tab above. 633:about the 302:discussion 57:(pictured) 986:this tool 979:this tool 82:Knowledge 32:Main Page 992:Cheers.— 832:unsigned 764:unsigned 726:unsigned 481:Colorado 308:and the 886:my edit 700:favors. 589:on the 451:on the 342:on the 201:on the 165:tunnels 161:bridges 104:C-class 34:in the 555:Alerts 315:Trains 226:Trains 110:scale. 859:talk 840:talk 817:talk 795:talk 772:talk 750:talk 734:talk 710:talk 636:U.S. 163:and 960:RfC 930:to 920:to 910:to 900:to 851:did 694:are 581:Low 443:Low 334:Mid 275:DYK 193:Low 1018:: 973:. 968:}} 964:{{ 861:) 842:) 819:) 797:) 787:my 774:) 752:) 736:) 712:) 658:. 479:: 1005:) 1001:( 988:. 981:. 857:( 838:( 815:( 793:( 770:( 748:( 732:( 708:( 663:! 641:. 593:. 455:. 346:. 312:. 205:. 116:: 74:. 63:?

Index


Main Page
Did you know
check views
Maroon Creek Bridge
Aspen, Colorado
Knowledge:Recent additions/2011/October
Template:Did you know nominations/Maroon Creek Bridge

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Bridges and Tunnels
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels
bridges
tunnels
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Trains
WikiProject icon

Trains Portal
DYK
WikiProject Trains
rail transport
project page
discussion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑