891:, you'd have to get a ruling from the GA Cup judges; so far as I know they don't typically give credit if someone takes over an existing review. That said, since Esquivalience has abandoned the review, if no one takes over the review directly, I'd typically put the nomination back into the reviewing pool, something I'd be happy to do here, since Ritchie333 has been waiting quite a while. Once it's back in the pool, you're free to pick it up as a new review. (The old review is not failed, and the nomination can retain its seniority.)
750:
635:
603:
552:
498:
475:
455:
418:
398:
321:
293:
250:
202:
647:"Remains of the 1937 realignment of the line from Lydd to New Romney, closed since 1967" but the reader/viewer can't see where the remains are in this photograph. I am not casting aspersions against the photo but to the casual reader this photograph just appears to show a field around a gravel quarry pond... I am not sure why this image is in the article. Let's discuss.
915:
Review finished up for the article and for the nominator. From a quick glance it seems to me that the article doesn't have any major issues and the previous Review went through most of the GA Criteria, it doesn't seem fair to me to make the nominator & the article wait all the way through a whole new GA Review so, that being said, I'll just take it over.
42:
685:
Either 1 or 3 would be fine - 1 because it shows the lines in the earth left from the traintracks and 3 because it shows that now-nonsensical stile. 3 has some type of signage on the far side - is that a walking path directional arrow or a remnant of RR signage? Not being familiar with UK road etc
914:
So I can go ahead and just take over the Review? Just start working on what's there and finish up? Huh, I didn't know I could do that... I'll check with the GA Cup Judges and see what they have to say re: scoring. I actually don't care about the GA Cup points, I just would like to get the GA
850:. So, does the apparently-abandoned Review get closed as a Fail? And the nominator then nominates it again?...What is the procedure in these types of cases? I'll take it on, I don't care about the date of the nomination on
641:
803:
if I can step in and finish or if I need to start another Review...not sure what the procedure is in these types of cases. Will let you know when any of the more-experienced knowers of GA Review arcania get back to me.
517:
As the article hints at, the line has the potential to be a fast link between the current Home
Secretary's constituency and Westminster, so I'd say its future is looking brighter than ever.
918:
And since this whole discussion has veered somewhat off the rails for the the page it's on, how about we put any further discussion elsewhere - my user talk is fine or there is
919:
800:
240:
80:
47:
70:
755:
Am doing some more deep read/proofreading readthroughs to see if I missed anything, but pending the image/s above's so far it's all looking pretty good.
593:
315:
244:
236:
823:
126:
228:
353:
310:, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
122:
52:
345:
348:
has been all over the news about strikes, closures and general disruption (which I personally witnessed first-hand when I was stuck in
670:. The third one might be the most suitable, as it shows a stile going over a fence for no obvious reason whatsoever. Any preferences?
180:
107:
311:
503:
I'll say - this railway lines seems to have at least 9 lives and then some! IT's been scheduled for cancellation *so* many times.
785:
708:
678:
525:
364:
232:
156:
99:
75:
392:
851:
597:
356:) and I don't think the link is going to come back any time in the short-term future, so I've removed it for now.
625:
303:
224:
770:
585:
349:
773:'s GA review; the reviewer has disappeared and it's been "under review" for about 2 months now. I did ask on
589:
469:
275:
465:
449:
896:
863:
700:
Okay, as Cilla once said, I'm going with 3. The sign on the other side is probably "public footpath".
927:
879:
809:
783:
760:
720:
706:
691:
676:
652:
613:
562:
523:
508:
428:
412:
408:
376:
362:
335:
260:
212:
170:
150:
834:
115:
17:
819:
774:
629:
546:
854:
but it will have to be done correctly as I am participating in the most recent GA Cup. Calling
314:, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
286:
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
909:
892:
855:
577:
327:
923:
888:
875:
805:
794:
778:
756:
716:
701:
687:
671:
648:
609:
558:
518:
504:
424:
372:
357:
331:
256:
208:
184:
166:
146:
769:
Cool, thanks. When you're done here, I don't suppose you can do me a favour and pick up
843:
827:
495:
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
488:
287:
92:
871:
859:
307:
920:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup#Talk:Liverpool Street station/GA1
801:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup#Talk:Liverpool Street station/GA1
867:
818:
When a GA review is started but not finished, people sometimes leave a note at
686:
signs I'm not sure but it did catch my eye when I was zooming in on the photo.
199:
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
931:
900:
883:
838:
813:
787:
764:
724:
710:
695:
680:
656:
617:
566:
527:
512:
432:
380:
366:
339:
264:
216:
174:
160:
668:
662:
665:
642:
File:Dismantled railway in Gravel Quarry near Lydd (geograph 2461856).jpg
545:
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
922:
and maybe link to this discussion back here if wanted. Thanks,
644:. I know that the included information says that it's of the
371:
Ah ok...too bad the information has completely disappeared.
207:
Lays the facts out, and establishes the general timeline.
824:
Knowledge talk:Good article nominations#Incomplete review
847:
134:
103:
255:No words to watch, WP:MOS seems to be all in line.
165:I will review this article for possible GA status.
661:In Geograph, we have the following alternatives :
608:All of the images have the proper permissions.
423:Copyviotool gives this article an "all-clear".
8:
468:without going into unnecessary detail (see
352:last year with 3 kids and no train back to
30:
344:Since I put the article up to GA review,
61:
33:
7:
846:- As the nominator said above, they
575:Is it illustrated, if possible, by
330:" is dead. Please correct/adjust.
24:
852:Talk:Liverpool Street station/GA2
640:I am puzzled by the image of the
328:Southern trains route information
748:
633:
601:
550:
496:
473:
453:
416:
396:
319:
291:
248:
200:
316:scientific citation guidelines
1:
777:but there were no takers :-(
175:06:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
161:06:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
749:
634:
602:
551:
497:
474:
454:
417:
397:
320:
292:
249:
201:
966:
288:the layout style guideline
932:03:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
901:02:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
884:22:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
839:21:48, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
814:19:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
788:17:10, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
765:16:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
725:22:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
711:17:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
696:16:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
681:11:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
657:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
618:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
594:valid fair use rationales
567:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
528:11:36, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
513:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
433:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
381:16:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
367:11:36, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
346:Govia Thameslink Southern
340:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
265:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
217:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
771:Liverpool Street station
223:B. It complies with the
628:to the topic, and have
312:likely to be challenged
864:User:Figureskatingfan
715:Looks good - thanks.
443:broad in its coverage
354:Ashford International
549:or content dispute:
466:focused on the topic
448:A. It addresses the
409:copyright violations
393:no original research
281:no original research
326:The external link "
18:Talk:Marshlink line
822:, see for example
407:D. It contains no
245:list incorporation
630:suitable captions
596:are provided for
304:in-line citations
89:
88:
957:
913:
856:User:BlueMoonset
848:already did that
830:
798:
752:
751:
637:
636:
605:
604:
598:non-free content
590:copyright status
554:
553:
500:
499:
477:
476:
457:
456:
420:
419:
400:
399:
323:
322:
308:reliable sources
295:
294:
252:
251:
204:
203:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
965:
964:
960:
959:
958:
956:
955:
954:
907:
828:
792:
391:C. It contains
227:guidelines for
225:manual of style
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
963:
961:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
916:
844:User:Redrose64
799:I've asked at
747:Pass or Fail:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
645:
624:B. Images are
622:
621:
620:
584:A. Images are
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
462:
461:
460:
452:of the topic:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
405:
404:
403:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
300:
299:
298:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
237:words to watch
221:
220:
219:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
962:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
911:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
898:
894:
890:
887:
886:
885:
881:
877:
873:
872:User:MrWooHoo
869:
865:
861:
860:User:3family6
857:
853:
849:
845:
842:
841:
840:
836:
832:
825:
821:
817:
816:
815:
811:
807:
802:
796:
791:
790:
789:
786:
784:
782:
781:
776:
772:
768:
767:
766:
762:
758:
754:
753:
746:
745:
743:
740:
726:
722:
718:
714:
713:
712:
709:
707:
705:
704:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
684:
683:
682:
679:
677:
675:
674:
669:
666:
663:
660:
659:
658:
654:
650:
646:
643:
639:
638:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
582:
580:
579:
574:
568:
564:
560:
556:
555:
548:
544:
543:
541:
537:
529:
526:
524:
522:
521:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
502:
501:
494:
493:
491:
490:
485:
479:
478:
471:
470:summary style
467:
463:
459:
458:
451:
447:
446:
444:
440:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:
414:
410:
406:
402:
401:
394:
390:
382:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
365:
363:
361:
360:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
289:
285:
284:
282:
278:
277:
272:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
229:lead sections
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:
198:
197:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
186:
183:review – see
182:
177:
176:
172:
168:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
779:
741:
702:
672:
576:
539:
519:
487:
464:B. It stays
450:main aspects
442:
358:
280:
274:
194:well written
193:
187:for criteria
179:
178:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
910:BlueMoonset
893:BlueMoonset
874:. Thanks,
868:User:Jaguar
588:with their
104:visual edit
924:Shearonink
889:Shearonink
876:Shearonink
806:Shearonink
795:Ritchie333
780:Ritchie333
757:Shearonink
717:Shearonink
703:Ritchie333
688:Shearonink
673:Ritchie333
649:Shearonink
610:Shearonink
559:Shearonink
520:Ritchie333
505:Shearonink
425:Shearonink
413:plagiarism
373:Shearonink
359:Ritchie333
332:Shearonink
276:verifiable
257:Shearonink
209:Shearonink
167:Shearonink
147:Shearonink
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
306:are from
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
626:relevant
557:Stable!
547:edit war
350:Brighton
185:WP:WIAGA
157:contribs
76:Criteria
742:Overall
489:neutral
302:B. All
241:fiction
127:history
108:history
94:Article
870:, and
831:rose64
820:WT:GAN
775:WT:GAN
592:, and
586:tagged
578:images
540:stable
538:Is it
486:Is it
441:Is it
273:Is it
243:, and
233:layout
192:Is it
279:with
136:Watch
16:<
928:talk
897:talk
880:talk
835:talk
833:🌹 (
826:. --
810:talk
761:talk
721:talk
692:talk
653:talk
614:talk
563:talk
509:talk
429:talk
411:nor
377:talk
336:talk
261:talk
213:talk
171:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
829:Red
472:):
930:)
899:)
882:)
862:,
858:,
837:)
812:)
763:)
744::
723:)
694:)
667:,
664:,
655:)
632::
616:)
600::
581:?
565:)
542:?
511:)
492:?
445:?
431:)
415::
395::
379:)
338:)
318::
290::
283:?
263:)
247::
239:,
235:,
231:,
215:)
196:?
181:GA
173:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
926:(
912::
908:@
895:(
878:(
866:,
808:(
797::
793:@
759:(
719:(
690:(
651:(
612:(
561:(
507:(
427:(
375:(
334:(
259:(
211:(
169:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.