2089:, stating that my edit apparently "wasn't well-written" and that "less is more" (whatever that is supposed to mean). I replied in detail (please read my response in the link), stating why I believe that my edit is an improvement compared to both the old version and his/her edit (which is also missing one paragraph). (S)he didn't reply back - I'm not sure if (s)he consciously decided not to, or if his/her IP address has since changed so (s)he didn't get the notification, but either way, no response, which is why I'm taking this matter further and asking the question here.
1783:, you'd have to get a ruling from the GA Cup judges; so far as I know they don't typically give credit if someone takes over an existing review. That said, since Esquivalience has abandoned the review, if no one takes over the review directly, I'd typically put the nomination back into the reviewing pool, something I'd be happy to do here, since Ritchie333 has been waiting quite a while. Once it's back in the pool, you're free to pick it up as a new review. (The old review is not failed, and the nomination can retain its seniority.)
2194:
edit, as I still believe that it is better-written than the original version (unless of course you believe otherwise). The majority of the changes I made have similar information anyway, just worded and structured more clearly. I removed a few minor details which I thought weren't relevant to the "Route" section (e.g. the former name of Ham Street station - if anywhere that can go to "History" instead), and added a few things that suited this section more (e.g. the number of tracks north of
Appledore).
2226:, one should be careful when using YouTube as a source, however in this case the video does the job well enough, since all one needs to do is watch the video and count the tracks and that would prove the statement true. In fact both of these sources can also be used to support other bits that are unsourced in my edit, for example that the passing loop at Rye station exists, and that there is an electrified siding parallelling the line between Ore Tunnel and Ore station.
730:
709:
802:
371:
239:
212:
44:
1642:
1527:
1495:
1444:
1390:
1367:
1347:
1310:
1290:
1213:
1185:
1142:
1094:
181:
21:
428:
438:
407:
1539:"Remains of the 1937 realignment of the line from Lydd to New Romney, closed since 1967" but the reader/viewer can't see where the remains are in this photograph. I am not casting aspersions against the photo but to the casual reader this photograph just appears to show a field around a gravel quarry pond... I am not sure why this image is in the article. Let's discuss.
1807:
Review finished up for the article and for the nominator. From a quick glance it seems to me that the article doesn't have any major issues and the previous Review went through most of the GA Criteria, it doesn't seem fair to me to make the nominator & the article wait all the way through a whole new GA Review so, that being said, I'll just take it over.
2187:
971:
910:
2073:, by changing the wording of the paragraphs in the "Route" and "Services" sections (in my opinion they weren't very clear), adding a new main photo, moving some of the other pictures around, and moving one picture to the right-hand side because I really don't like the text layout when the image is on the left. Later that day this was
253:
2257:
Images have to go on the left hand side because of the way the infobox formatting works - if you try and right-align an image before the end of an infobox, it will drop it below the end of the box, probably in completely the wrong place and disrupt images. So we have to make do with left-align images
2150:
The very short single-track link between the
Newtown Road bridge and Ashford International platform 1 is factually correct, but probably over-detail to the casual reader - I've travelled up and down the Marshlink more times than I've had hot dinners but I never noticed it before. Maybe, if you've got
2118:
In the meantime, I am going to revert the current edit back to "my" version. This is not because I want to "push" my edit, but in order to prevent any more back-and-forth reverts, and to redirect people to the talk page if they have any further questions. Of course if the final consensus goes against
2210:
I will say, though, that the photo at Rye works perfectly with what is said in the "Routes" section - that's why I decided to move the picture down there. The text (in my edit) says that Rye station acts as a double-track passing loop for passenger services, and the photo does a good job telling the
1577:
Either 1 or 3 would be fine - 1 because it shows the lines in the earth left from the traintracks and 3 because it shows that now-nonsensical stile. 3 has some type of signage on the far side - is that a walking path directional arrow or a remnant of RR signage? Not being familiar with UK road etc
2261:
The photo of the two trains at Rye is a busy point on the line, but I think it's also the most memorable and recognisable portion for anyone who's travelled on it. Obviously opinions will vary, but once you've passed through one or two fields through Romney Marsh with not much to look at but sheep,
2221:
Regarding the short single-track bit in
Ashford, I don't agree with putting that detail in a footnote. The rest of the line has a full description of how many tracks each section has, so it doesn't make sense to call this one an over-detail, even if the single track is very short. As for references
2253:
I've done a bit more expansion on this article, using sources I can find, and dropped in the reference to the short single-track section immediately south of
Ashford International; however there's not really much relevant to the route to write about. It kind of passes through the middle of nowhere
2394:
I'm not aware of any electrification scheme for this line in the 1930s - the electrification from
Brighton and Wivelsfield via Lewes (opened July 1935) had deliberately finished at Ore. It might be assumed that the electrification would have terminated at Hastings, but that had been vetoed on the
2206:
does show that the line is unelectrified, but in my opinion it doesn't show the line's true character. The picture was taken at the busiest point on the entire line by far, which is in the middle of a built-up area - contrary to the rest of this rural line. Furthermore, the line has two tracks at
2077:
by the other user - it appears that (s)he kept the first few paragraphs in the "Route" section the same as in "my" edit, and reverted the rest of my edit back to the "original", including the images. (S)he later added what was the new main photo back, and put it in the "Future" section - not sure
2193:
I understand why you have reverted the edit back to the original - in hindsight maybe I should have done the same. For the same reasons I described above, I shall leave it as is for now, until we come to a consensus here. However, for the "final" version, I still think we should work based on my
2134:
I've reverted back to the version as I last saw it, which is closer to what originally passed the GA review. I personally like the picture of the rolling stock passing at Rye, because this is a very distinctive and unique feature of the line, given its scarcity as being one of the few mainstream
1806:
So I can go ahead and just take over the Review? Just start working on what's there and finish up? Huh, I didn't know I could do that... I'll check with the GA Cup Judges and see what they have to say re: scoring. I actually don't care about the GA Cup points, I just would like to get the GA
2236:
As for the "disused" station building and platform at
Winchelsea - I'll admit I may have used the wrong word here! By "disused" I meant "no longer in use by the railway", not "no longer in use at all". Simply removing the word from that sentence would fix this issue though and the rest of the
2426:
plus various Ian Allan ABCs of the 1960s, show that DEMUs nos. 1101-1122 were built as two-car units (2-H) in 1957-58, and units 1123-33 were built as three-car units (3-H) in 1959-62. Of the 2-H units, the first eighteen (unit nos. 1101-1118) were designated as
Hampshire units - these were
2427:
strengthened to three cars in 1959 being reclassified 3-H; the other four (unit nos. 1119-1122) were designated as
Hastings units and remained as two-car units until about 1979/80 when they too were strengthened to three cars, being reclassified 3-T. TOPS classes were
2237:
sentence would remain coherent. (But in any case, I do believe that the platform (but not the building) is actually disused, considering it's terribly overgrown and isn't fenced off from the track that's still in use. Sadly I can't find a source for that though...)
2065:
Following an edit dispute with another IP user, I've decided that the best solution would be to ask the question here. The dispute concerns three recent revisions; more specifically the wording of the paragraphs and (to an extent) the location of images.
2115:(I was originally going to create an RfC for this, to also get an opinion from someone who has no interest in railways - however after reading the help page, I'm not sure whether RfCs can be used for three-way questions so I don't want to risk it.)
2201:
implies that the line passes mostly through rural countryside (which is true), shows that diesel
Turbostars operate on the line, and the bright colours make it stand out more. Those are all the features that a main photo needs, really. Meanwhile,
2203:
1742:. So, does the apparently-abandoned Review get closed as a Fail? And the nominator then nominates it again?...What is the procedure in these types of cases? I'll take it on, I don't care about the date of the nomination on
1533:
1695:
if I can step in and finish or if I need to start another Review...not sure what the procedure is in these types of cases. Will let you know when any of the more-experienced knowers of GA Review arcania get back to me.
2215:. Personally, I think this is how images should be laid out in general - the main photo doesn't have to be detailed, it just has to be relevant and look pretty; photos with details can then be used to complement text.
2207:
this point and it's not immediately obvious that the line reduces to single-track either side of the station (and even if it were, this detail is not important enough to have to be included in the main photo).
2398:
As for "Thumper" diesel units - classes 201 to 207 inclusive all fit that description, but classes 201 to 203 would have been too extravagant for this line, as they had six cars each. Careful examination of
34:
2135:
diesel-only services in the South East. I agree that it would be helpful to have a bit more detail in the "Route" section as it's rather sparse; the catch is since this is a GA, whatever we should add
2240:
2120:
151:
2218:
Regardless of what photo should be used at the top, I still really dislike the idea of having some images on the left side of the text. I just think it makes the text layout look really ugly.
1409:
As the article hints at, the line has the potential to be a fast link between the current Home
Secretary's constituency and Westminster, so I'd say its future is looking brighter than ever.
2395:
grounds of congestion at that station. There was also more space at Ore for a carriage shed to be built, and indeed they were able to build one large enough for four twelve-car trains.
2197:
I realise that this is probably a matter of taste, but I personally disagree with your claim that the picture of trains at Rye is better-suited as the main photo for the article.
1810:
And since this whole discussion has veered somewhat off the rails for the the page it's on, how about we put any further discussion elsewhere - my user talk is fine or there is
55:
2508:
2558:
2523:
1811:
1692:
1132:
1009:
770:
331:
1881:
976:
578:
2548:
574:
488:
132:
2254:(which is indeed a key reason why it was a hair's breadth away from being closed altogether during the 60s and 70s) so there's not really much to write about.
2533:
999:
385:
1647:
Am doing some more deep read/proofreading readthroughs to see if I missed anything, but pending the image/s above's so far it's all looking pretty good.
1485:
654:
2222:
to support this sentence, I've found two. One of them () is from a book published in 2017. The second one () is a YouTube video - I'm aware that as per
2553:
2518:
2078:
why, since that photo has nothing to do with the future of the line, therefore it doesn't belong there. No explanation was given for these edits so I
1207:
1136:
1128:
2543:
1715:
780:
341:
2476:
confirms that 2-H units 1119-22 were built for Crowhurst-Bexhill and Hastings-Ashford services, and also used on Ashford-New Romney services. --
2528:
1940:
1120:
2538:
2513:
2465:
1245:
1202:, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
498:
30:
875:
2563:
2298:
585:
2139:
contain an inline citation to a reliable source that justifies its inclusion. Can you briefly list the bits you think should be re-added,
981:
1865:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
683:
Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a
2111:(note that this version is missing the paragraph about the route between Rye Harbour and Ore Tunnel, which would have to be added back).
1237:
73:
2244:
2124:
1240:
has been all over the news about strikes, closures and general disruption (which I personally witnessed first-hand when I was stuck in
1562:. The third one might be the most suitable, as it shows a stile going over a fence for no obvious reason whatsoever. Any preferences?
1072:
33:. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the
2415:
1998:
1203:
746:
380:
303:
299:
222:
1395:
I'll say - this railway lines seems to have at least 9 lives and then some! IT's been scheduled for cancellation *so* many times.
2503:
2386:
2270:
2166:
1968:
1677:
1600:
1570:
1417:
1256:
1124:
1048:
808:
633:
547:
2340:" which admits it may not be fully accurate and welcomes corrections. The specific claims I'd like another good source for are:
2198:
2108:
2102:
2096:
2079:
2074:
2070:
1004:
684:
617:
464:
61:
1284:
272:
2330:
I'm having difficulty finding good sources for the rolling stock. I'm sure they must exist, such as old books or copies of
675:
737:
714:
295:
286:
217:
192:
1743:
812:
1489:
643:
451:
412:
1248:) and I don't think the link is going to come back any time in the short-term future, so I've removed it for now.
20:
2038:
1856:
1517:
1195:
1116:
611:
1662:
1477:
1241:
628:
607:
1665:'s GA review; the reviewer has disappeared and it's been "under review" for about 2 months now. I did ask on
2086:
1481:
1361:
1167:
1027:
113:
2432:
2428:
1357:
1341:
1023:
876:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060427143415/http://www.southernrailway.com:80/news.php?id=23&u=news.php
2048:
1995:
1909:
1866:
1788:
1755:
942:
922:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
663:
594:
198:
43:
1592:
Okay, as Cilla once said, I'm going with 3. The sign on the other side is probably "public footpath".
2458:
2408:
2384:
2268:
2164:
1966:
1819:
1771:
1701:
1675:
1652:
1612:
1598:
1583:
1568:
1544:
1505:
1454:
1415:
1400:
1320:
1304:
1300:
1268:
1254:
1227:
1152:
1104:
1062:
1042:
900:
826:
Is it a stopper from Hasting to Ashford *AND* a fast from Brighton to Ashford, or something elseĀ ???
801:
2484:
2443:
1726:
745:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
463:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1948:
1921:
1711:
1666:
1521:
1438:
460:
1746:
but it will have to be done correctly as I am participating in the most recent GA Cup. Calling
2158:" - This is not true, they are used as private dwellings. Where is your source of information?
2143:, and provided there are no objections, we should be able to put them back in. As to specifics:
1206:, and contentious material relating to living personsāscience-based articles should follow the
1178:
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
923:
879:
2462:
2412:
2295:
857:
639:
65:
2367:, but frustratingly it doesn't give me enough information to identify the specific volume of
2332:
1989:
1983:
1801:
1784:
1747:
1469:
1219:
938:
2345:
Electrification through to Ashford was planned, but abandoned in 1939 when the war started.
930:
2379:
2263:
2223:
2178:
2159:
2023:
1961:
1815:
1780:
1767:
1697:
1686:
1670:
1648:
1608:
1593:
1579:
1563:
1540:
1501:
1450:
1410:
1396:
1316:
1264:
1249:
1223:
1148:
1100:
1076:
1058:
1038:
865:
729:
708:
648:
2314:
1661:
Cool, thanks. When you're done here, I don't suppose you can do me a favour and pick up
2477:
2436:
2375:
2183:
thanks for getting back to me - honestly after all those weeks I thought no one would!
1905:
1901:
1735:
1719:
1387:
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
1380:
1179:
847:
827:
669:
659:
291:
929:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
370:
238:
211:
2497:
1944:
1917:
1763:
1751:
590:
307:
262:
2405:
British Rail Fleet Survey 9: Diesel Multiple Units - The Second Generation and DEMUs
2364:
2336:, but I can't easily get to any of that. The principal source for some of this is "
1199:
2360:
2354:
2349:
2344:
2155:
1812:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup#Talk:Liverpool Street station/GA1
1693:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup#Talk:Liverpool Street station/GA1
1759:
443:
2213:"this is what said passing loop looks like - two services pass each other here"
2092:
Which edit makes the most sense in terms of page layout, grammar and clarity?:
1710:
When a GA review is started but not finished, people sometimes leave a note at
1578:
signs I'm not sure but it did catch my eye when I was zooming in on the photo.
2082:. However, this was undone back by the other user, again with no explanation.
2047:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
2016:
598:
433:
1091:
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
2435:
for 3-H. Units 1119-1122 were the ones used on Hastings-Ashford services. --
1888:
622:
1560:
1554:
1030:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1557:
559:
Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted
2337:
2233:
use to confirm this? Can it be used as a source for the article as well?
2156:
although the old station building and second platform still stand disused
1979:
1913:
1534:
File:Dismantled railway in Gravel Quarry near Lydd (geograph 2461856).jpg
564:
560:
862:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
2488:
2447:
2388:
2272:
2248:
2168:
2128:
2028:
2007:
1970:
1952:
1925:
1894:
1823:
1792:
1775:
1730:
1705:
1679:
1656:
1616:
1602:
1587:
1572:
1548:
1509:
1458:
1437:
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
1419:
1404:
1324:
1272:
1258:
1231:
1156:
1108:
1066:
1052:
950:
830:
427:
406:
917:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
742:
2315:
to Ashford International ā Hastings DEMU cab ride ā 31 December 2016
2229:
Also, you just said that the above is factually correct - what did
252:
2361:
Instead, the company introduced Class 171"Turbostar" DMUs in 2003.
870:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
455:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of
294:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
1814:
and maybe link to this discussion back here if wanted. Thanks,
541:
456:
796:
174:
1536:. I know that the included information says that it's of the
1263:
Ah ok...too bad the information has completely disappeared.
885:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
880:
http://www.southernrailway.com/news.php?id=23&u=news.php
369:
290:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
1099:
Lays the facts out, and establishes the general timeline.
298:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1716:
Knowledge talk:Good article nominations#Incomplete review
1908:ā Generally not capped Line in sources, so downcase per
846:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1739:
851:
533:
528:
523:
518:
168:
Former featured article candidate, current good article
144:
125:
106:
2378:
this is your area of expertise, can you help at all?
2204:
the photo of two Turbostars passing each other at Rye
2037:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1941:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Marshlink Line
741:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1869:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1147:No words to watch, WP:MOS seems to be all in line.
1057:I will review this article for possible GA status.
352:
2051:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1553:In Geograph, we have the following alternativesĀ :
2455:British Railway Pictorial: Southern Region DEMUs
2355:In 1962, "Thumper" diesel units were introduced.
1960:as that appears to be what reliable sources use
2262:things might sort of look the same for people.
2085:The other IP then then left a short message on
1500:All of the images have the proper permissions.
1315:Copyviotool gives this article an "all-clear".
71:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
2058:Edit dispute - images, "Route" and "Services"
8:
2350:Line speed was reduced from 85 mph to 60 mph
1360:without going into unnecessary detail (see
1244:last year with 3 kids and no train back to
2453:Robertson, Kevin; Abbinnett, Hugh (2012).
2199:The photo of the Turbostar near Winchelsea
1855:The following is a closed discussion of a
959:
703:
506:
401:
349:
206:
85:
15:
1236:Since I put the article up to GA review,
2509:Engineering and technology good articles
2363:I can see this via a snippet preview in
56:Engineering and technology good articles
2282:
2241:2A00:23C5:D033:4400:28C2:63FE:1919:E201
2121:2A00:23C5:D033:4400:7943:5007:5D05:E7B0
990:
962:
705:
403:
208:
2559:Low-importance Sussex-related articles
2524:Low-importance rail transport articles
2338:A brief history of the Marshlink line
897:to let others know (documentation at
7:
2549:Low-importance Kent-related articles
2294:. Platform 5 Publishing Ltd. p.Ā 13.
2184:
1874:The result of the move request was:
1738:- As the nominator said above, they
735:This article is within the scope of
449:This article is within the scope of
284:This article is within the scope of
180:
178:
2534:Low-importance UK Railways articles
1467:Is it illustrated, if possible, by
1222:" is dead. Please correct/adjust.
353:Associated projects or task forces:
197:It is of interest to the following
14:
1744:Talk:Liverpool Street station/GA2
1532:I am puzzled by the image of the
1220:Southern trains route information
850:. Please take a moment to review
811:for this article can be found in
64:. If you can improve it further,
2554:GA-Class Sussex-related articles
2519:GA-Class rail transport articles
2185:
2119:my edit, it can be edited back.
1943:for why we are discussing here.
1640:
1525:
1493:
1442:
1388:
1365:
1345:
1308:
1288:
1211:
1183:
1140:
1092:
908:
800:
728:
707:
436:
426:
405:
251:
237:
210:
179:
42:
19:
775:This article has been rated as
493:This article has been rated as
336:This article has been rated as
2544:GA-Class Kent-related articles
2292:TRACKatlas of Mainland Britain
2249:17:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
2169:10:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
2151:a source, stick in a footnote.
1882:closed by non-admin page mover
1208:scientific citation guidelines
52:has been listed as one of the
1:
2529:GA-Class UK Railways articles
1987:
1669:but there were no takersĀ :-(
1067:06:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
1053:06:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
951:00:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
749:and see a list of open tasks.
676:Kent geography stubs articles
467:and see a list of open tasks.
378:This article is supported by
304:WikiProject Trains to do list
2539:All WikiProject Trains pages
2514:Old requests for peer review
2489:19:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
2448:15:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
2389:12:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
1641:
1526:
1494:
1443:
1389:
1366:
1346:
1309:
1289:
1212:
1184:
1141:
1093:
755:Knowledge:WikiProject Sussex
316:Knowledge:WikiProject Trains
2564:WikiProject Sussex articles
2273:16:06, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
2258:as the least worst option.
2129:13:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
2099:, before both of our edits;
1848:Requested move 9 March 2017
813:Template:Marshlink Line RDT
758:Template:WikiProject Sussex
319:Template:WikiProject Trains
2580:
2029:07:24, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
2008:04:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
1895:17:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
1180:the layout style guideline
868:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
843:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
831:17:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
781:project's importance scale
634:Unreferenced Kent articles
499:project's importance scale
473:Knowledge:WikiProject Kent
342:project's importance scale
152:Featured article candidate
31:featured article candidate
2403:Haresnape, Brian (1986).
1971:16:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
1953:15:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
1926:15:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
1824:03:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
1793:02:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
1776:22:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1731:21:48, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1706:19:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1680:17:10, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1657:16:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1617:22:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1603:17:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1588:16:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1573:11:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1549:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1510:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1486:valid fair use rationales
1459:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1420:11:36, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1405:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1325:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1273:16:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1259:11:36, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1238:Govia Thameslink Southern
1232:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1157:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
1109:07:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
774:
723:
612:Maidstone Borough Council
505:
492:
476:Template:WikiProject Kent
421:
377:
348:
335:
232:
205:
165:
88:
84:
2044:Please do not modify it.
1862:Please do not modify it.
1663:Liverpool Street station
1115:B. It complies with the
608:List of churches in Kent
2504:Knowledge good articles
1520:to the topic, and have
1204:likely to be challenged
1028:Talk:Marshlink Line/GA1
839:External links modified
761:Sussex-related articles
510:WikiProject Kent tasks:
381:WikiProject UK Railways
322:rail transport articles
809:route diagram template
374:
187:This article is rated
2087:my old IP's talk page
2069:I edited the article
1756:User:Figureskatingfan
1607:Looks good - thanks.
1335:broad in its coverage
1246:Ashford International
664:Bromley Civic Society
595:Royal Tunbridge Wells
479:Kent-related articles
373:
62:good article criteria
2371:and the page number.
2290:Mike Bridge (2017).
1441:or content dispute:
1358:focused on the topic
1340:A. It addresses the
1301:copyright violations
1285:no original research
1173:no original research
854:. If necessary, add
557:Clean up an article:
114:Good article nominee
2109:The other IP's edit
2015:āit's the sources.
1218:The external link "
889:parameter below to
2071:twice on 22 August
1714:, see for example
1299:D. It contains no
1137:list incorporation
738:WikiProject Sussex
461:South East England
375:
287:WikiProject Trains
193:content assessment
89:Article milestones
2467:978-0-7110-3511-9
2431:for 2-H and 3-T;
1885:
1522:suitable captions
1488:are provided for
1196:in-line citations
1018:
1017:
949:
819:
818:
795:
794:
791:
790:
787:
786:
702:
701:
698:
697:
694:
693:
689:
400:
399:
396:
395:
392:
391:
282:
281:
173:
172:
161:
160:
80:
2571:
2480:
2471:
2439:
2421:
2369:Railway Magazine
2362:
2356:
2351:
2346:
2333:Railway Magazine
2318:
2312:
2306:
2304:
2300:978 1909431 26 3
2287:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2182:
2157:
2046:
2026:
2021:
2006:
1891:
1879:
1864:
1805:
1748:User:BlueMoonset
1740:already did that
1722:
1690:
1644:
1643:
1529:
1528:
1497:
1496:
1490:non-free content
1482:copyright status
1446:
1445:
1392:
1391:
1369:
1368:
1349:
1348:
1312:
1311:
1292:
1291:
1215:
1214:
1200:reliable sources
1187:
1186:
1144:
1143:
1096:
1095:
972:Copyvio detector
960:
945:
944:Talk to my owner
940:
915:
912:
911:
904:
869:
861:
804:
797:
763:
762:
759:
756:
753:
732:
725:
724:
719:
711:
704:
681:
655:Expert attention
548:tasks you can do
507:
481:
480:
477:
474:
471:
452:WikiProject Kent
446:
441:
440:
439:
430:
423:
422:
417:
409:
402:
360:
350:
324:
323:
320:
317:
314:
255:
246:
245:
241:
234:
233:
228:
225:
214:
207:
190:
184:
183:
182:
175:
166:Current status:
147:
128:
126:January 13, 2020
109:
86:
69:
46:
23:
16:
2579:
2578:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2494:
2493:
2478:
2468:
2452:
2437:
2418:
2402:
2328:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2313:
2309:
2301:
2289:
2288:
2284:
2186:
2176:
2060:
2055:
2042:
2024:
2017:
2004:
1939:ā see notes at
1889:
1860:
1850:
1799:
1720:
1684:
1283:C. It contains
1119:guidelines for
1117:manual of style
1022:This review is
1014:
986:
958:
948:
943:
913:
909:
898:
863:
855:
841:
824:
760:
757:
754:
751:
750:
717:
649:Kingdom of Kent
629:Citation needed
579:High importance
538:
478:
475:
472:
469:
468:
442:
437:
435:
415:
358:
321:
318:
315:
312:
311:
283:
257:
256:
226:
220:
191:on Knowledge's
188:
143:
124:
105:
12:
11:
5:
2577:
2575:
2567:
2566:
2561:
2556:
2551:
2546:
2541:
2536:
2531:
2526:
2521:
2516:
2511:
2506:
2496:
2495:
2492:
2491:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2466:
2461:. pp.Ā 28, 45.
2424:
2423:
2422:
2416:
2407:. Shepperton:
2396:
2373:
2372:
2358:
2352:
2347:
2327:
2324:
2320:
2319:
2307:
2299:
2281:
2280:
2276:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2152:
2145:
2144:
2113:
2112:
2106:
2100:
2097:The "original"
2059:
2056:
2054:
2053:
2039:requested move
2033:
2032:
2031:
2010:
2002:
1973:
1955:
1937:Support as nom
1933:
1932:
1910:WP:TITLEFORMAT
1906:Marshlink line
1902:Marshlink Line
1900:
1898:
1872:
1871:
1857:requested move
1851:
1849:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1808:
1736:User:Redrose64
1691:I've asked at
1639:Pass or Fail:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1537:
1516:B. Images are
1514:
1513:
1512:
1476:A. Images are
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1344:of the topic:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1129:words to watch
1113:
1112:
1111:
1033:
1032:
1016:
1015:
1013:
1012:
1007:
1002:
996:
993:
992:
988:
987:
985:
984:
982:External links
979:
974:
968:
965:
964:
957:
954:
941:
935:
934:
927:
883:
882:
874:Added archive
848:Marshlink Line
840:
837:
835:
823:
820:
817:
816:
805:
793:
792:
789:
788:
785:
784:
777:Low-importance
773:
767:
766:
764:
747:the discussion
733:
721:
720:
718:Lowāimportance
712:
700:
699:
696:
695:
692:
691:
679:
678:
666:
660:Channel Tunnel
651:
636:
625:
614:
601:
582:
568:
561:alphabetically
540:Here are some
537:
536:
531:
526:
521:
515:
512:
511:
503:
502:
495:Low-importance
491:
485:
484:
482:
465:the discussion
448:
447:
431:
419:
418:
416:Lowāimportance
410:
398:
397:
394:
393:
390:
389:
386:Low-importance
376:
366:
365:
363:
361:
355:
354:
346:
345:
338:Low-importance
334:
328:
327:
325:
292:rail transport
280:
279:
278:week 13, 2017
276:
268:
267:
258:
250:
249:
244:
242:
230:
229:
227:Lowāimportance
215:
203:
202:
196:
185:
171:
170:
163:
162:
159:
158:
155:
148:
140:
139:
136:
129:
121:
120:
117:
110:
102:
101:
98:
95:
91:
90:
82:
81:
50:Marshlink line
47:
39:
38:
27:Marshlink line
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2576:
2565:
2562:
2560:
2557:
2555:
2552:
2550:
2547:
2545:
2542:
2540:
2537:
2535:
2532:
2530:
2527:
2525:
2522:
2520:
2517:
2515:
2512:
2510:
2507:
2505:
2502:
2501:
2499:
2490:
2486:
2482:
2475:
2469:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2434:
2430:
2425:
2419:
2417:0-7110-1604-6
2414:
2411:. pp.Ā 17ā19.
2410:
2406:
2401:
2400:
2397:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2387:
2385:
2383:
2382:
2377:
2370:
2366:
2359:
2357:(which ones?)
2353:
2348:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2339:
2335:
2334:
2326:Rolling stock
2325:
2316:
2311:
2308:
2302:
2297:
2293:
2286:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2274:
2271:
2269:
2267:
2266:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2232:
2227:
2225:
2219:
2216:
2214:
2208:
2205:
2200:
2195:
2191:
2180:
2170:
2167:
2165:
2163:
2162:
2153:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2116:
2110:
2107:
2104:
2101:
2098:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2083:
2081:
2076:
2072:
2067:
2063:
2062:Hi everyone,
2057:
2052:
2050:
2045:
2040:
2035:
2034:
2030:
2027:
2022:
2020:
2014:
2011:
2009:
2000:
1997:
1994:
1992:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1974:
1972:
1969:
1967:
1965:
1964:
1959:
1956:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1897:
1896:
1893:
1892:
1883:
1877:
1870:
1868:
1863:
1858:
1853:
1852:
1847:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1803:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1764:User:MrWooHoo
1761:
1757:
1753:
1752:User:3family6
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1694:
1688:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1674:
1673:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1645:
1638:
1637:
1635:
1632:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1601:
1599:
1597:
1596:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1571:
1569:
1567:
1566:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1474:
1472:
1471:
1466:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1447:
1440:
1436:
1435:
1433:
1429:
1421:
1418:
1416:
1414:
1413:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1393:
1386:
1385:
1383:
1382:
1377:
1371:
1370:
1363:
1362:summary style
1359:
1355:
1351:
1350:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1336:
1332:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1313:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1286:
1282:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1253:
1252:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1216:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1188:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1174:
1170:
1169:
1164:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1121:lead sections
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1097:
1090:
1089:
1087:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1078:
1075:review ā see
1074:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1037:
1031:
1029:
1025:
1020:
1019:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
1001:
998:
997:
995:
994:
989:
983:
980:
978:
975:
973:
970:
969:
967:
966:
961:
955:
953:
952:
946:
939:
932:
928:
925:
921:
920:
919:
918:
906:
902:
896:
892:
888:
881:
877:
873:
872:
871:
867:
859:
853:
849:
844:
838:
836:
833:
832:
829:
821:
814:
810:
806:
803:
799:
798:
782:
778:
772:
769:
768:
765:
748:
744:
740:
739:
734:
731:
727:
726:
722:
716:
713:
710:
706:
690:
687:
686:
677:
673:
671:
667:
665:
661:
658:
656:
652:
650:
647:
645:
641:
637:
635:
632:
630:
626:
624:
621:
619:
615:
613:
609:
605:
602:
600:
596:
592:
589:
587:
586:Refine/polish
583:
580:
576:
572:
569:
566:
562:
558:
555:
554:
553:
551:
550:
549:
543:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
517:
516:
514:
513:
509:
508:
504:
500:
496:
490:
487:
486:
483:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:
445:
434:
432:
429:
425:
424:
420:
414:
411:
408:
404:
387:
384:(assessed as
383:
382:
372:
368:
367:
364:
362:
357:
356:
351:
347:
343:
339:
333:
330:
329:
326:
309:
308:Trains Portal
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
288:
277:
275:
274:
270:
269:
266:
265:
264:
263:TrainsĀ Portal
259:
254:
248:
247:
243:
240:
236:
235:
231:
224:
219:
216:
213:
209:
204:
200:
194:
186:
177:
176:
169:
164:
156:
154:
153:
149:
146:
142:
141:
137:
135:
134:
130:
127:
123:
122:
118:
116:
115:
111:
108:
107:March 1, 2017
104:
103:
99:
96:
93:
92:
87:
83:
78:
76:
75:
67:
63:
59:
58:
57:
51:
48:
45:
41:
40:
36:
32:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2454:
2404:
2380:
2374:
2368:
2365:Google Books
2331:
2329:
2310:
2291:
2285:
2277:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2239:
2235:
2230:
2228:
2220:
2217:
2212:
2209:
2196:
2192:
2175:
2160:
2141:with sources
2140:
2136:
2117:
2114:
2091:
2084:
2068:
2064:
2061:
2043:
2036:
2018:
2012:
1990:
1975:
1962:
1957:
1936:
1899:
1887:
1875:
1873:
1861:
1854:
1671:
1633:
1594:
1564:
1468:
1431:
1411:
1379:
1356:B. It stays
1342:main aspects
1334:
1250:
1172:
1166:
1086:well written
1085:
1079:for criteria
1071:
1070:
1056:
1045:
1035:
1034:
1021:
1010:Instructions
936:
916:
907:
894:
890:
886:
884:
845:
842:
834:
825:
776:
736:
682:
680:
668:
653:
638:
627:
616:
603:
584:
570:
556:
546:
545:
539:
494:
450:
379:
337:
302:. See also:
296:project page
285:
271:
261:
260:
199:WikiProjects
167:
157:Not promoted
150:
131:
112:
72:
70:
66:please do so
54:
53:
49:
29:is a former
26:
2457:. Hersham:
2049:move review
1991:SMcCandlish
1867:move review
1802:BlueMoonset
1785:BlueMoonset
1766:. Thanks,
1760:User:Jaguar
1480:with their
1024:transcluded
901:Sourcecheck
565:by category
444:Kent portal
145:May 2, 2024
133:Peer review
2498:Categories
2381:Ritchie333
2278:References
2265:Ritchie333
2179:Ritchie333
2161:Ritchie333
2080:undid them
1963:Ritchie333
1876:Page moved
1816:Shearonink
1781:Shearonink
1768:Shearonink
1698:Shearonink
1687:Ritchie333
1672:Ritchie333
1649:Shearonink
1609:Shearonink
1595:Ritchie333
1580:Shearonink
1565:Ritchie333
1541:Shearonink
1502:Shearonink
1451:Shearonink
1412:Ritchie333
1397:Shearonink
1317:Shearonink
1305:plagiarism
1265:Shearonink
1251:Ritchie333
1224:Shearonink
1168:verifiable
1149:Shearonink
1101:Shearonink
1059:Shearonink
1039:Shearonink
977:Authorship
963:GA toolbox
685:suggestion
599:Canterbury
300:discussion
60:under the
2459:Ian Allan
2409:Ian Allan
2376:Redrose64
2317:ā YouTube
2103:"My" edit
2075:re-edited
1984:WP:NCCAPS
1198:are from
1036:Reviewer:
1000:Templates
991:Reviewing
956:GA Review
931:this tool
924:this tool
623:K College
581:articles.
2224:WP:YTREF
1980:MOS:CAPS
1945:Dicklyon
1918:Dicklyon
1914:MOS:CAPS
1518:relevant
1449:Stable!
1439:edit war
1242:Brighton
1077:WP:WIAGA
1049:contribs
1005:Criteria
937:Cheers.ā
858:cbignore
822:Serivces
644:Copyedit
544:related
306:and the
189:GA-class
138:Reviewed
74:reassess
2211:reader
2025:(talk)
2013:Support
1976:Support
1958:Support
1634:Overall
1381:neutral
1194:B. All
1133:fiction
947::Online
887:checked
852:my edit
779:on the
640:Cleanup
604:Expand:
591:Ashford
524:history
497:on the
340:on the
97:Process
35:archive
2481:rose64
2440:rose64
1931:Survey
1762:, and
1723:rose64
1712:WT:GAN
1667:WT:GAN
1484:, and
1478:tagged
1470:images
1432:stable
1430:Is it
1378:Is it
1333:Is it
1165:Is it
1135:, and
1125:layout
1084:Is it
895:failed
866:nobots
828:Pickle
752:Sussex
743:Sussex
715:Sussex
313:Trains
218:Trains
195:scale.
119:Listed
100:Result
1171:with
1026:from
670:Stubs
534:purge
529:watch
223:in UK
2485:talk
2483:š¹ (
2463:ISBN
2444:talk
2442:š¹ (
2413:ISBN
2296:ISBN
2245:talk
2137:must
2125:talk
2019:Tony
1982:and
1978:per
1949:talk
1922:talk
1912:and
1890:Dane
1820:talk
1789:talk
1772:talk
1727:talk
1725:š¹ (
1718:. --
1702:talk
1653:talk
1613:talk
1584:talk
1545:talk
1506:talk
1455:talk
1401:talk
1321:talk
1303:nor
1269:talk
1228:talk
1153:talk
1105:talk
1063:talk
1043:talk
891:true
807:The
674:see
618:NPOV
577:and
573:the
571:Edit
563:and
542:Kent
519:edit
470:Kent
457:Kent
413:Kent
94:Date
2479:Red
2438:Red
2433:205
2429:204
2231:you
2041:.
2005:ā±·ā¼
2001:ā½ā±·Ņ
1886:--
1721:Red
1364:):
905:).
893:or
878:to
771:Low
575:Top
489:Low
459:in
332:Low
273:Sel
2500::
2487:)
2446:)
2247:)
2127:)
1988:ā
1986:.
1951:)
1924:)
1916:.
1904:ā
1878:.
1859:.
1822:)
1791:)
1774:)
1754:,
1750:,
1729:)
1704:)
1655:)
1636::
1615:)
1586:)
1559:,
1556:,
1547:)
1524::
1508:)
1492::
1473:?
1457:)
1434:?
1403:)
1384:?
1337:?
1323:)
1307::
1287::
1271:)
1230:)
1210::
1182::
1175:?
1155:)
1139::
1131:,
1127:,
1123:,
1107:)
1088:?
1073:GA
1065:)
1051:)
903:}}
899:{{
864:{{
860:}}
856:{{
662:,
610:,
606::
597:,
593:,
552::
388:).
359:/
221::
77:it
68:.
2470:.
2420:.
2305:)
2303:.
2243:(
2181::
2177:@
2154:"
2123:(
2105:;
2003:į“„
1999:Ā¢
1996:ā
1993:āŗ
1947:(
1920:(
1884:)
1880:(
1818:(
1804::
1800:@
1787:(
1770:(
1758:,
1700:(
1689::
1685:@
1651:(
1611:(
1582:(
1543:(
1504:(
1453:(
1399:(
1319:(
1267:(
1226:(
1151:(
1103:(
1061:(
1046:Ā·
1041:(
933:.
926:.
914:Y
815:.
783:.
688:.
672::
657::
646::
642:/
631::
620::
588::
567:.
501:.
344:.
310:.
201::
79:.
37:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
