Talk:Mashup (web application hybrid)

611:

down the line. There was talk a few years back about eliminating the HTML style attribute, and I argued that the style attribute is the ONLY "pocket" that could be used to carry the AUTHOR PREFERRED STYLE along-with any transcluded node. I think a node author should be allowed to say "Yes, you can use this node/article IF you use MY CSS styles when you present it in your 'mashup'". I think that if the node author wants transcluders to use original author-preferred CSS, transcluders should honor that. Later, when node-serving is commonplace, a mechanism to accomplish come-along CSS should be invented/included. That, is not an easy task, considering many served nodes will simply have ID or CLASS CSS selectors... and these selectors will be referencing stylerules at the AUTHOR'S site, and not at the site of the transcluded nodes. The transcluder COULD just LINK-in the CSS files from the originating site IF they are external .css files. If they are in a style element in the HEAD of a document, look out. And under either condition, beit style element or external stylesheets, blind stylesheet including could lead to CSS selector name collisions. This is why... when nodes are to be transcluded, they should somehow have their style... shoved into a style attribute in the node itself and carried along in that way... where CSS selectors are not a factor. As the nodeserver 'installs' a style attribute in the transcluded nodes on the way out the door, it should also remove all ID and CLASS selectors from the node(s).

607:

Trans-copyright is also involved, as transcluding is, in a way, node-serving. Node-servers are a yet-undiscovered thing. Content developers/authors, in theory, could/would 'allow' (or disallow) HTML nodes to be transport-included (transcluded), and an html 'node' (think of it as an article or paragraph) could be included in another's webpage IF the node-author wants to allow it, and if trans-copyright rules have been satisfied. The transcluded node was supposed to be bi-directional. Ideally, there is a link that leads back to the markup/page that originally contained said node, and thus, at minimum, proper credit for the transcluded content could be maintained. Ted Nelson has been shunned and somehow pushed-aside by the greater web community even though he and Project Xanadu were/are VERY far ahead of their time. To NOT bring-up Ted Nelson's long-ago work on transclusion... in a discussion about these so-called "mashups"... is nothing short of an ethics crime.

1197:"A mashup combines data from more than one source and integrates that data to create something new and unique. The merging of datasets provides unique events that we can act on, which gives the mashup it's uniqueness. At it's simplest form we define a mashup as being the intersection of this data combination and event generation process. However in practice the mashup will usually provide more features around the data and events. Typically we see a nice presentation of the information. We also see new processes and events being generated and ran as a result of these events. 1206:

functionality from two or more services and creating something new. The best exanmples for this are in the cloud computing, web-services, public API space. For example a company could mix up some Amazon web services, and also mix up some services from another business. They may or may not throw in a service of it's own, but they market and sell the complete package as a service or a process. I think this is a mashup as well, and I do not know the best way to combine this into a single definition without confusing others right now.

176: 155: 186: 1040:

the unitiated reader wonders, how does a web application combining content from different sources constitute a critique or commentary on those. Nor would the uninitiated have an idea what the difference between a mashup using a public interface vs. not using a public interface. To really get a sense of what's being described, you have to read the outside articles or follow the links, and in that regard, it seems to fail as an encyclopedia article.

281: 260: 440: 380: 353: 124: 913:

the see also section. Further more, and this explain why it has been simply removed. After browsing on Windows Live Local web site, there does not seems to be a mention on its API either! Therefore, you cannot build new application on this service, then this service cannot be used to build new mashup. As a conclusion, this link is irrelevant in the section see also, and in the mashup article. --

1361:) have reverted it back several times (which I agree with). I restored the content for Business Mashup to this article once already. I don't see any reason to break Business Mashups into a separate article as this article is nowhere near too long. I recommend that we keep the content here for the foreseeable future, until it gets too unweildy. Does anyone besides BusinessMashup disagree? 1661: 81: 28: 1429: 974:

What I propose for the time being. We add the link to this Microsoft service article somewhere else in the mashup article by mentioning that it is possible to build mashup application that uses map from this service or others. If you do not write any objection, I will update the article in a couple of days. --

1529:

The lead paragraph claims "The term mashup originally comes from British - West Indies slang meaning to be intoxicated, or as a description for something or someone not functioning as intended." Surely software use of term comes from use in music, and there is no reference to this origin in the entry

912:

Link is refused for several reasons: on the Knowledge page of Windows Live Local there is no mention of an API that would allow developers to use the facility of this service to build new application upon it (Google Map's Knowledge article does speak about it). So this link should not be place yet in

772:

I came to this talk page because the current definition of mashup on the article page seems to focus on the idea that a mashup is content. (I wanted to comment that a mashup (imho, but who didn't know what a mashup even could be a few weeks ago) could also be a website created by mixing and matching

1271:

Business Mashups are a key component of integrating business and data services, as Business Mashups technologies provide the ability to develop new integrated services quickly, to combine internal services with external or personalized information, and to make these services tangible to the business

973:

article, I mean that those articles in this section should speak also of mashup or possible use of the service for other web site. I would like to have your understanding that we can put the link in this section only if the Windows Live Local article is updated with relevant, insightful information.

1275:

Legal and commercial issues are often an underlooked aspect related Business Mashups. For example, there are sometimes restrictions on using an API with a device that is not a Web browser or it is not possible to use that API to provide a commercial service. In addition, the API providers often do

687:

I think Todd's suggestion is valid - to make the description more "generic", rather than making reference to web applications as the source. However, I think that inclusion of the fact that the sources are web/internet sources, and that there is an established API (as compared to "screen-scraping")

479:

On the other hand, the verb "to mesh" is related to the noun "mesh" like what you have in a net, and can be defined as "to cause something to resemble a network". Now I'm not a native English speaker, however, couldn't one think of the combining of data into one application as some kind of "tying a

1039:

The "lead paragraph," which is actually just a lead sentence, is just about the only thing that provides a clue as to what a mashup really is, if you don't already know. This is then followed by the statement "It is sometimes created as a critique or commentary on an existing work or product," and

818:

which (in anthropology and cultural studies) means more or less the same thing as 'mashup', only in the 'real world'. I think we can get some useful perspective on 'mashups' by comparing them with the literature on bricolage. (This is another fine example of the internet community thinking they've

696:

But a website that combines information would be cnn.com or bbc.com, not a mashup. I'd say "website" is collection of urls, but a "web application" is a narrower collection of urls for a single purpose. A "Web Application" tends to mean something narrower yet, where the caps signify a particular

610:

ONE of the problems seen, and once publicly-discussed by myself and others, is author-preferred CSS styles. Although I don't know much about the DOM .getComputedStyle function, it COULD BE used to get the CSS settings on ANY node... once that node is rendered and its styles allowed to cascade on

1386:

to exist is to become a part of a Mashup application. Both articles have been tagged for improvement. I believe that the effort to merge these articles would produce more comprehensive coverage of the topic and a higher quality article. I would start by adding a "Components" section with "Mashup

1205:

I keep using the term data and two or more data sources. While this is true and fine, and it is what we see almost all the mashups doing now. Especially the public mahsups. I also think there is another element which we could call 'function' so with this, we could also have a mashup by mixing

1158:

Let's get rid of examples like youMashTube. Unless I am missing something here. I went to the site, and it seemed all their data came from youtube, and that they had a nice user interface for it. In my definition. I do not feel that a nifty new user interface falls into the mashup category.

1263:

and data sources to produce results that were not the original reason for producing the raw source data. Buinsess Mashups are different from other types of mashups such as consumer mashups in the way the are built and the technologies used to build them. An example of a business mashup is an

475:

The Oxford English Dictionary defines the verb "to mash" as "to reduce or beat to a mash", or "(in brewing) to mix (powdered malt) with hot water to form wort". None of them quite fits the notion we are trying to describe in this article, namely combining data from different sources into one

840:

I agree, why not pick some popular sites from programmableweb.com, etc and link to them?? for instance, veloroutes.org uses google maps, usgs elevation data, geonames reverse geo-location, flickr api, youtube api... just an example but there should at least be some links to actual mashups..

606:

From Wingnut: Hello, thanks for asking about history. Although few mention it, I believe the original "mashup" was a two-directional thing that POSSIBLY originated with Ted Nelson's "Thinking Machines" and was originally called "transclusion". It should probably STILL be called that.

632:

I have a question I keep asking and still dont see an answer covered in this article, namely, What is the difference between a mashup and a portal. They both combine source material from different sources into a single web page. So, what distinquishes one from another?

622:

When one can quantify information and the usefulness thereof, define operators for the sum or multiplication of information, and show that a mashup performs these operations, then we can say that mashups can make information exponentially more useful. Minor edit

964:

OK, thank you for the information, I have found it but as mentioned I would not put it in the see also, because the Windows Live Local article on Knowledge does not talk about the possible usage of this service for other web sites (using the SDK). The

1076:

Concur: I still don't know what a mashup is after reading this article. Furthermore, the distinction between a mashup and a portal seems to rest on the presence of an "API," but the article neither defines "API" nor provides a link to more

1149:

I have too many comments and disagreements with the information on this page and would like to help in revamping it. I do not mind helping with the material, however I need to get some of my ideas out in the open for others to review.

776:

To pick a very bad example (because it may not have any chance of working), couldn't a mashup be a website created with (say) some combination of Plone, Ruby on Rails, and whatever else? (regardless of where the content comes from)

1530:

on that use. I couldn't even find evidence that this is a UK-WI slang term with that meaning, let alone that it's where this usage is derived from. I suggest deleting this unless some sort of support can be offered for the claim.

864:

of having examples, I don't find an encyclopedic purpose to the current list of examples. The programmableweb link provides all the examples anyone needs for the limited purpose of simply seeing examples. Based on

869:, I suggest that any further references to specific mashup sites be done to clarify, or serve as references for, specific points in the article. Consequently, I'm removing the links to individual example sites. 1264:

management dashboard, which might include data from relational databases and LDAP directories and have access control features to ensure that the mashup user has permission to view the business data. Unlike

553:

It is not a matter of "done on the browser" or "done on the server". An enterprise mashup is a Web application based on the mashup paradigm, used in a business context, e.g., an analytical dashboard.

1229:

A seperate article was created for business mashups which seems unnecessary. I've added some of the content to this article but here is the rest. I would add it but am not familiar with this topic.

614:

I know, TMI, but, that's the LONG story of nodeserving/transclusion and some of its hurdles. Thanks for asking about the history, fellow wiki-tweaker! Well done. End of input by Wingnut.

472:

I am wondering if the naming "mashup" isn't kind of imprecise or a mix-up of spellings, and whether the name for the phenomenon discussed here should be "mesh-up" rather than "mash-up"?

1784: 849:

Examples would be helpful, but it's not clear to me which ones to pick. The ones currently listed aren't necessarily the most popular or most instructive ones to show, for instance.

1403:

I agree - for now the two articles should be merged together... lightweight visual interfaces for user generated mashups are key to the popularity and pervasiveness of mashups.

1155:

I would like to remove everything that claims a mashup is similar to a portal and is somehow about data aggregation. iGoogle aggregates data, but I do not think it is a mashup.

710:

I agree with Todd about the missing "website" part, but API is an essential part of the definition (as oposed to screens-scrapping, as Steve mention). So, my suggestion is:

810:

Yeas, it almost certainly does. Which is why the term "Mashup" should be reserved for pop music, and the top line should say "For website usage see: Bastard Webmonkeying."

1020:

is of interest for the article (under Articles about mashups). But the links in the section "Sites about mashups" are questionable. If it was considered that a site like

43: 585:

It would be great if someone could add a little history of mashups. when was the first mashup? how have mashups evolved? What were the enabling technologies? etc.

1794: 1601: 1597: 1583: 1691:

text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of

1199:

I hope I have convinced you that a mashup has to have this generation of unique events that was not possible before the merging of the data or functionality.

1159:

While it is true that a lot of mashups have nice new user interfaces. I would consider the lastest UI technologies as a part of Web 2.0 in general and RIA.

755:

I added virtualvideomap.com as an example of a "Video Mashup". What do you think about combining the titles of "Video Mashup" and "Map Mashup" sections?

1779: 1754: 1210:

I will keep trying to iron out my ideas and provide more examples. I am just not happy with all the definitions and explanations I have seen so far.

836:

When a user comes across this page, he might want to see a live example of mashuup website, however, in this page, we do NOT have such kind of links.

430: 420: 242: 232: 1168:

I think once we start getting precise about what we call a mashup, then we can just call it a Mashup and remove this web-application hybrid language.

1677: 1789: 1044: 996: 937: 892: 825: 1774: 1759: 1749: 526:

A conversant contributor please add an explanation of consumer mashups (done in the browser) versus enterprise mashups (done on the server).

1769: 335: 325: 1726:

from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.

1162:

News aggregation -- Digg example. I do not digg that often, but doesn't this site just aggregate data? They do not really mash it do they?

1326: 1000: 896: 736: 592: 569: 62:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see 1050:

There is no definition for someone who doesn't know what a mashup is. What seems to be a definition only makes the reader more confused.

993:

The links to Business Week remains while all others got removed except Programmableweb.com. Is it because Business Week has more money?

941: 396: 208: 1764: 1130: 109: 1165:"Mashups versus portals" section has to go. Along with "Architectural aspects of mashups" section and "Information overload section" 1579:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

507:

Comment: I dont think that there is any hope in going against established linguistic usages. Formal rules are powerless against it.

496: 1799: 1553: 1268:

technology, there are no industry standards regarding for Business Mashups and there is some debate regarding the definition .

1094: 660:). Likewise, some of the providers such as eBay and Google AdSense have mashable information provided via Javascript includes. 449: 363: 301: 97: 59: 480:

net"? I.e. wouldn't "mesh-up" be a much more correct metaphor (and probably also the original one) than "mash-up"? Opinions?

1804: 773:

web applications (or similar). This (talk) page seems to address that (iiuc), but the article doesn't, or not very clearly.

387: 358: 199: 160: 1017: 1358: 1065: 542: 1276:

not provide any sort of warranty in case of failure to deliver the service. These aspects may limit the applicability of

1644: 713:"a website or a web application created using the public interface or API of two or more third party applications." 135: 1255:

that combines data or functionality from one or more sources into a single integrated business application. The term

666:

In summary, I think a more encompassing though still accurate deinifinition would read something to the effect of...

1344: 288: 265: 1723: 1664:

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:

39: 1600:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1665: 1569: 1462:

I was searching for a List of Knowledge Mashups. Does that exist? If not, would be nice to have. I've put some

596: 1703:

properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original

1320: 1004: 900: 740: 565: 123: 945: 1635: 1561: 1134: 647:"a web application created using the public interface or API of two or more third party applications." 1714:

for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Knowledge takes copyright violations

1215: 1179: 1557: 492: 1316: 822: 561: 1731: 1619:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1607: 1115: 842: 512: 141: 1560:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1061: 1211: 1175: 1114:

The language in at least the lead paragraph is awful, full of buzzwords and mostly devoid of meaning.

691: 185: 175: 154: 1707: 1688: 1684: 1392: 1126: 1053: 874: 732: 588: 557: 530: 488: 484: 716: 1673: 1500: 1088: 793: 781: 1531: 1057: 624: 395:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

300:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

207:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

112:

for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

1710:

from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our

1668:. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, 1412: 1041: 1604:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

672:

The definition could then go on to talk about the various methods for sourcing the information.

1620: 1735: 1649: 1539: 1535: 1516: 1490: 1486: 1475: 1451: 1420: 1396: 1372: 1367: 1352: 1238: 1234: 1219: 1183: 1138: 1118: 1101: 1028: 1008: 978: 949: 917: 904: 878: 853: 797: 784: 744: 719: 704: 681: 663:

Again, wondering if we could expand the definition to clearly include these types of sources.

639: 627: 600: 573: 546: 538: 516: 500: 55: 1727: 1416: 1277: 701: 508: 1627: 697:

system for serving web applications. In short the existing definition seems better to me.

1496: 1447: 1388: 1330: 1252: 1244: 1025: 975: 914: 870: 850: 808:"The etymology of this term almost certainly derives from its similar use in pop music..." 191: 1481:

I agree, a list would be useful - please add if it can be done to Knowledge guidelines.

280: 259: 1586:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1512: 1471: 1383: 1338: 1082: 1626:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1743: 1711: 866: 678: 636: 1699:, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and 669:"a website or web application that combines information from more than one source." 439: 1700: 1482: 1362: 1348: 1291: 1230: 534: 1672:

it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see

656:

Second, I personally use a number of RSS feeds as sources in my mashups (example:

1660: 1593: 1189:

I will take a stab at a definition that I need to refine and get feedback on....

297: 1302: 650:

First, web application is an established term with a somewhat narrow meaning.

379: 352: 1592:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1442: 1265: 181: 1573: 1504: 1666:

https://archive.is/20120718175204/http://sw.deri.org/2009/09/financial-data/

1570:

https://archive.is/20120718175204/http://sw.deri.org/2009/09/financial-data/

1508: 1467: 1463: 1334: 815: 688:

to make this information available is an important part of the definition.

653:

I'm wondering if we could expand this to say a website OR web application.

1696: 392: 204: 729:

Mashup; The combination of one (1) or more products or services. ftw!

1495:

Just found out, not categorised that way but they are listed here:

1378:

Merge proposal - Mashup enabler into Mashup (web application hybrid)

931: 814:

Apropos terminology... How about a link from this page to the term

1259:

implies easy, fast integration, frequently done by access to open

1034: 1024:

should be removed, then those two left should also be removed. --

819:

made something up which in fact has been around for millennia).

293: 1194:

My core grounding belief about this goes something like this..:

803: 1260: 1035:

If you don't know what a mashup is, this article isn't helpful

117: 75: 22: 1021: 438: 1387:

enabler" as one of the subsections. Any other suggestions?

1564:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

926:

Please look for a link says "Developers" on the bottom of

1676:

if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or

832:

A Section of Mashup examples should be added to this page

804:

Shouldn't titles be reserved for the most COMMON usage ??

1280:

unless specific service level agreements are in place.

203:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1436: 927: 657: 105: 101: 92: 87: 67: 63: 34: 391:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 292:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1596:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1272:user through user-friendly Web browser interfaces. 726:Shouldn't "API" be spelled out before the acronym? 1171:The types of mashups section needs some edits too. 1303:Define enterprise mashup and win a $ 50 gift card 644:I have a few xquestions about this definition... 889:In addition to the existing link to Google Map. 1785:Start-Class software articles of Low-importance 885:Added a link to the Windows Live Local article. 722:nospamwikipedia /at/ ambros /dot/ com /dot/ br 1582:This message was posted before February 2018. 1292:Google Maps/Google Earth APIs Terms of Service 1439:, with no attempt to tidy/harmonise content. 8: 121: 1574:http://sw.deri.org/2009/09/financial-data/ 1552:I have just modified one external link on 790:That's called "application integration". 768:Content vs. Web Tool (application?) Mashup 347: 254: 149: 79: 1405:Ace Anomalous 20:32, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 1016:Yep, one could ask that... However, the 86:Text and/or other creative content from 20:|page=Mashup (web application hybrid)}} 1284: 758:I also corrected a grammatical error. 349: 256: 151: 1545:External links modified (January 2018) 1123:It still is dreadful one year later! 1795:Unknown-importance Computing articles 1674:"using copyrighted works from others" 1411:I like the "Components" section idea 7: 385:This article is within the scope of 286:This article is within the scope of 197:This article is within the scope of 1329:) has tried several times to break 140:It is of interest to the following 1203:That brings me to another point... 14: 1556:. Please take a moment to review 932:http://dev.live.com/virtualearth/ 1780:Low-importance software articles 1755:Low-importance Internet articles 1678:"donating copyrighted materials" 1659: 1427: 378: 351: 279: 258: 184: 174: 153: 122: 26: 1554:Mashup (web application hybrid) 425:This article has been rated as 330:This article has been rated as 237:This article has been rated as 98:Mashup (web application hybrid) 60:Mashup (web application hybrid) 1790:Start-Class Computing articles 1139:16:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 1119:23:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1068:) 23:26, April 10, 2007 (UTC) 764:webmaster@virtualvideomap.com 628:20:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 405:Knowledge:WikiProject Software 217:Knowledge:WikiProject Internet 1: 1775:Start-Class software articles 1760:WikiProject Internet articles 1750:Start-Class Internet articles 1517:21:31, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 1491:14:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 1476:19:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 1225:Content from business mashups 1102:18:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 1029:23:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 1009:01:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 979:16:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 950:11:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 918:23:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 905:21:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 879:10:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 860:Without disagreeing with the 720:19:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC) 705:04:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 547:17:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 517:16:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 447:This article is supported by 408:Template:WikiProject Software 399:and see a list of open tasks. 304:and see a list of open tasks. 220:Template:WikiProject Internet 211:and see a list of open tasks. 1770:Low-importance Maps articles 1650:21:23, 20 January 2018 (UTC) 1397:14:43, 10 October 2009 (UTC) 1333:into a separate article and 1312:Breaking out Business Mashup 826:13:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 574:16:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 16:|date=(D:)July 2021 |result= 1718:, and persistent violators 1220:11:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 1184:11:57, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 1018:first link to business week 745:10:17, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 682:15:08, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 1821: 1712:guideline on non-free text 1613:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1549:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1452:09:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 1373:20:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 1239:17:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 1045:12:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 969:section is related to the 785:15:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 675:Any thoughts appreciated. 640:13:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 431:project's importance scale 336:project's importance scale 310:Knowledge:WikiProject Maps 243:project's importance scale 1765:Start-Class Maps articles 1736:19:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC) 1655:Copyright problem removed 1540:22:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC) 1145:Page Makeover Suggestions 1022:http://www.webmashup.com/ 854:20:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 501:11:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 446: 424: 373: 329: 313:Template:WikiProject Maps 274: 236: 169: 148: 96:was copied or moved into 66:; for its talk page, see 1695:, and, if allowed under 1421:14:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC) 798:01:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 601:07:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC) 1458:Knowledge Mashups List? 684:toddlevy hotmail com 581:A Little History Please 1800:All Computing articles 1382:The only reason for a 443: 130:This article is rated 1805:All Software articles 1056:comment was added by 999:comment was added by 940:comment was added by 895:comment was added by 618:Uncategorised entries 450:WikiProject Computing 442: 1594:regular verification 928:http://map.live.com/ 658:http://xboxradar.com 388:WikiProject Software 200:WikiProject Internet 104:. The former page's 54:. Its contents were 50:with a consensus to 1687:, we cannot accept 1584:After February 2018 1501:Knowledge:Searching 989:Business Week Links 110:provide attribution 1638:InternetArchiveBot 1589:InternetArchiveBot 1525:West Indian Slang? 1110:Marketing language 522:Enterprise mashups 444: 136:content assessment 38:was nominated for 1614: 1466:, on my page. - 1371: 1129:comment added by 1069: 1012: 953: 908: 735:comment added by 591:comment added by 577: 560:comment added by 550: 533:comment added by 504: 487:comment added by 465: 464: 461: 460: 457: 456: 411:software articles 346: 345: 342: 341: 253: 252: 249: 248: 223:Internet articles 116: 115: 74: 73: 1812: 1663: 1648: 1639: 1612: 1611: 1590: 1445: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1365: 1305: 1300: 1294: 1289: 1278:Business Mashups 1141: 1100: 1097: 1091: 1085: 1051: 994: 935: 890: 796: 751:Video Map Mashup 747: 603: 576: 554: 549: 527: 503: 481: 413: 412: 409: 406: 403: 382: 375: 374: 369: 366: 355: 348: 318: 317: 314: 311: 308: 289:WikiProject Maps 283: 276: 275: 270: 262: 255: 225: 224: 221: 218: 215: 194: 189: 188: 178: 171: 170: 165: 157: 150: 133: 127: 126: 118: 95: 83: 82: 76: 35:Mashup (digital) 30: 29: 23: 1820: 1819: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1740: 1739: 1657: 1642: 1637: 1605: 1598:have permission 1588: 1562:this simple FaQ 1547: 1527: 1497:Knowledge:Tools 1460: 1440: 1428: 1426: 1380: 1331:Business Mashup 1314: 1309: 1308: 1301: 1297: 1290: 1286: 1253:Web application 1249:business mashup 1245:web development 1227: 1191: 1147: 1124: 1112: 1095: 1089: 1083: 1080: 1052:—The preceding 1037: 995:—The preceding 991: 936:—The preceding 891:—The preceding 887: 834: 806: 791: 770: 753: 730: 714: 670: 648: 620: 586: 583: 555: 528: 524: 482: 470: 410: 407: 404: 401: 400: 367: 361: 315: 312: 309: 306: 305: 268: 222: 219: 216: 213: 212: 192:Internet portal 190: 183: 163: 134:on Knowledge's 131: 91: 80: 48:31 January 2013 27: 12: 11: 5: 1818: 1816: 1808: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1792: 1787: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1742: 1741: 1716:very seriously 1656: 1653: 1632: 1631: 1624: 1577: 1576: 1568:Added archive 1546: 1543: 1526: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1459: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1401: 1384:Mashup enabler 1379: 1376: 1317:BusinessMashup 1313: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1295: 1283: 1282: 1226: 1223: 1208: 1190: 1187: 1173: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1146: 1143: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1078: 1071: 1070: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1001:141.154.35.246 990: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 957: 956: 955: 954: 921: 920: 897:141.154.35.246 886: 883: 882: 881: 857: 856: 846: 845: 833: 830: 828:Brennan Young 823:217.74.218.254 813: 809: 805: 802: 801: 800: 769: 766: 761:Let me know. 752: 749: 737:114.198.66.114 725: 712: 709: 700: 668: 646: 619: 616: 593:211.100.39.250 582: 579: 562:Matteo.picozzi 523: 520: 469: 466: 463: 462: 459: 458: 455: 454: 445: 435: 434: 427:Low-importance 423: 417: 416: 414: 397:the discussion 383: 371: 370: 368:Low‑importance 356: 344: 343: 340: 339: 332:Low-importance 328: 322: 321: 319: 302:the discussion 284: 272: 271: 269:Low‑importance 263: 251: 250: 247: 246: 239:Low-importance 235: 229: 228: 226: 209:the discussion 196: 195: 179: 167: 166: 164:Low‑importance 158: 146: 145: 139: 128: 114: 113: 108:now serves to 93:Mashup enabler 84: 72: 71: 46:was closed on 44:The discussion 31: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1817: 1806: 1803: 1801: 1798: 1796: 1793: 1791: 1788: 1786: 1783: 1781: 1778: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1747: 1745: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1685:legal reasons 1681: 1680:if you are.) 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1662: 1654: 1652: 1651: 1646: 1641: 1640: 1629: 1625: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1609: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1585: 1580: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1550: 1544: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1524: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1505:Commons:Tools 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1444: 1438: 1434: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1404: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1385: 1377: 1375: 1374: 1369: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1343: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1325: 1322: 1318: 1311: 1304: 1299: 1296: 1293: 1288: 1285: 1281: 1279: 1273: 1269: 1267: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1224: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1207: 1204: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1188: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1170: 1167: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1154: 1153: 1151: 1144: 1142: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1121: 1120: 1117: 1116:213.100.20.12 1109: 1103: 1098: 1096:Contributions 1092: 1086: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1043: 1030: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 988: 980: 977: 972: 968: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 951: 947: 943: 942:24.60.179.169 939: 933: 929: 925: 924: 923: 922: 919: 916: 911: 910: 909: 906: 902: 898: 894: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 863: 859: 858: 855: 852: 848: 847: 844: 843:63.225.174.47 839: 838: 837: 831: 829: 827: 824: 820: 817: 811: 799: 795: 789: 788: 787: 786: 783: 778: 774: 767: 765: 762: 759: 756: 750: 748: 746: 742: 738: 734: 727: 723: 721: 718: 711: 707: 706: 703: 698: 694: 693: 689: 685: 683: 680: 676: 673: 667: 664: 661: 659: 654: 651: 645: 642: 641: 638: 634: 630: 629: 626: 617: 615: 612: 608: 604: 602: 598: 594: 590: 580: 578: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 551: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 521: 519: 518: 514: 510: 505: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 477: 476:application. 473: 467: 452: 451: 441: 437: 436: 432: 428: 422: 419: 418: 415: 398: 394: 390: 389: 384: 381: 377: 376: 372: 365: 360: 357: 354: 350: 337: 333: 327: 324: 323: 320: 316:Maps articles 303: 299: 295: 291: 290: 285: 282: 278: 277: 273: 267: 264: 261: 257: 244: 240: 234: 231: 230: 227: 210: 206: 202: 201: 193: 187: 182: 180: 177: 173: 172: 168: 162: 159: 156: 152: 147: 143: 137: 129: 125: 120: 119: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 89: 85: 78: 77: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 36: 32: 25: 24: 21: 19: 1719: 1715: 1704: 1692: 1682: 1669: 1658: 1636: 1633: 1608:source check 1587: 1581: 1578: 1551: 1548: 1528: 1461: 1432: 1408: 1407: 1402: 1400: 1381: 1355: 1341: 1323: 1315: 1298: 1287: 1274: 1270: 1256: 1248: 1242: 1228: 1209: 1202: 1201: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1174: 1148: 1131:77.197.180.8 1122: 1113: 1077:information. 1038: 992: 970: 966: 888: 861: 835: 821: 812: 807: 779: 775: 771: 763: 760: 757: 754: 731:— Preceding 728: 724: 715: 708: 699: 695: 690: 686: 677: 674: 671: 665: 662: 655: 652: 649: 643: 635: 631: 621: 613: 609: 605: 584: 556:— Preceding 552: 525: 506: 478: 474: 471: 448: 426: 386: 331: 287: 238: 198: 142:WikiProjects 88:this version 51: 47: 33: 17: 15: 1728:Johnnie Bob 1693:information 1689:copyrighted 1389:John Harvey 1212:Brianpwolfe 1176:Brianpwolfe 1125:—Preceding 867:WP:NOT#LINK 702:JohnJBarton 692:Stevesawyer 587:—Preceding 529:—Preceding 509:Ppolsinelli 483:—Preceding 298:Cartography 132:Start-class 64:its history 1744:Categories 1708:plagiarize 1701:referenced 1645:Report bug 1026:Huygens 25 976:Huygens 25 915:Huygens 25 871:Rich Janis 851:RaymondYee 489:Fiordiligi 1628:this tool 1621:this tool 1084:Septegram 862:principle 816:bricolage 717:GuiAmbros 364:Computing 102:this edit 1697:fair use 1634:Cheers.— 1359:contribs 1345:contribs 1327:contribs 1127:unsigned 1066:contribs 1054:unsigned 997:unsigned 967:see also 938:unsigned 893:unsigned 794:ShinmaWa 782:Rhkramer 733:unsigned 679:Toddlevy 637:PolyGlot 589:unsigned 570:contribs 558:unsigned 543:contribs 531:unsigned 497:contribs 485:unsigned 402:Software 393:software 359:Software 214:Internet 205:Internet 161:Internet 40:deletion 1724:blocked 1558:my edit 1532:Faff296 1483:Mikebar 1363:Toddst1 1349:Smartse 1231:Smartse 1058:Cubique 625:EnsGabe 535:Pmerson 429:on the 334:on the 241:on the 106:history 1670:unless 1347:) and 1266:portal 1257:Mashup 1042:Drlith 971:mashup 468:Naming 138:scale. 56:merged 1443:Trevj 1409:Agree 1251:is a 930:, or 100:with 58:into 52:merge 1732:talk 1720:will 1683:For 1536:talk 1513:talk 1509:Cy21 1503:and 1487:talk 1472:talk 1468:Cy21 1464:here 1448:talk 1437:Diff 1433:Done 1417:talk 1413:K.G. 1393:talk 1368:talk 1353:talk 1339:talk 1335:Whpq 1321:talk 1261:APIs 1247:, a 1235:talk 1216:talk 1180:talk 1135:talk 1090:Talk 1062:talk 1005:talk 946:talk 901:talk 875:talk 741:talk 597:talk 566:talk 539:talk 513:talk 493:talk 307:Maps 296:and 294:Maps 266:Maps 68:here 18:keep 1722:be 1602:RfC 1572:to 1441:-- 1243:In 792:-- 421:Low 326:Low 233:Low 90:of 42:. 1746:: 1734:) 1705:or 1615:. 1610:}} 1606:{{ 1538:) 1515:) 1507:. 1499:, 1489:) 1474:) 1450:) 1419:) 1395:) 1237:) 1218:) 1182:) 1137:) 1064:• 1007:) 948:) 934:. 903:) 877:) 780:-- 743:) 599:) 572:) 568:• 545:) 541:• 515:) 499:) 495:• 362:: 1730:( 1647:) 1643:( 1630:. 1623:. 1534:( 1511:( 1485:( 1470:( 1446:( 1415:( 1391:( 1370:) 1366:( 1356:· 1351:( 1342:· 1337:( 1324:· 1319:( 1233:( 1214:( 1178:( 1133:( 1099:* 1093:* 1087:* 1081:* 1060:( 1011:. 1003:( 952:. 944:( 907:. 899:( 873:( 739:( 595:( 564:( 537:( 511:( 491:( 453:. 433:. 338:. 245:. 144:: 70:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index