131:
113:
334:
shallow essence, so why the heck not a professional site (one of its kind) entirely devoted to the true masters of Cinema? There are many people across the world who sacrifice their time and energy , sometimes at the expense of their families and friends to keep that great resource going! IMO it would be a big loss to
Knowledge if you delete this article. Please consider keeping it. Thank u in advance.
229:
211:
82:
141:
239:
21:
306:
Someone pegged this page as being "an advertisement" and being about a "non-notable website". This page is perfectly legitimate, it is information about "Masters of Cinema" and the website is far from "non-notable", it is award-winning, non-profit based, and has been around for over five years. N. W.
333:
i WOULD vote with my feet to keep this site. It is non-commercial in nature, maintained by the devotees of the Art known as Cinema and thus belongs to the general treasure of knowledge, rightfully here in wikipedia. I personally have seen entries in this encyclopedia with infinitely less content and
357:
If the "list of
Criterion Collection" page is gonna be deleted then logically it follows that the list of releases on this page should also be removed. I personally am against both decisions, but either both should stay or both should go as it would hypocritical to remove one but not the other.
317:
If the website is so notable and has been around for so long, how come there are no listed citings by major news agencies, magazines, etc? Please add some quickly if you wish to prevent the deletion. You may also wish to comment on the AfD page, rather than on the article's talk page.
382:
378:
390:
386:
427:
187:
422:
339:
61:
51:
41:
193:
432:
163:
442:
437:
342:. What's more, the hard work of the people at the MoC site isn't really a criterion for it's place as an encyclopedic entry.
257:
154:
118:
269:
261:
93:
265:
252:
216:
27:
401:
363:
162:
articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
81:
99:
374:
20:
396:
359:
308:
130:
112:
377:
for exactly the same reason the
Criterion list and all other lists of this kind were deleted:
319:
146:
416:
343:
256:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
244:
234:
228:
210:
136:
30:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
407:
367:
346:
322:
311:
140:
273:
159:
383:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of
British Film Institute releases
379:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of
Powerhouse Films releases
391:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of BBC home video releases
387:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of
Twilight Time releases
75:
15:
338:
This isn't really the place for that comment. It belongs at
158:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
192:This article has not yet received a rating on the
340:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Masters of cinema
428:Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
272:. To improve this article, please refer to the
8:
373:Yes, absolutely it should not be here per
268:. To use this banner, please refer to the
205:
107:
79:
423:Stub-Class WikiProject Business articles
207:
109:
7:
250:This article is within the scope of
152:This article is within the scope of
98:It is of interest to the following
14:
266:regional and topical task forces
237:
227:
209:
139:
129:
111:
80:
19:
26:This article was nominated for
172:Knowledge:WikiProject Business
1:
433:WikiProject Business articles
178:WikiProject Business articles
175:Template:WikiProject Business
166:and see a list of open tasks.
408:12:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
459:
347:02:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
282:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
194:project's importance scale
443:WikiProject Film articles
368:20:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
323:21:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
312:16:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
285:Template:WikiProject Film
222:
191:
124:
106:
438:Stub-Class film articles
50:, 23 December 2015, see
393:, the list goes on...
88:This article is rated
60:, July 31, 2006, see
40:, 10 April 2017, see
155:WikiProject Business
258:join the discussion
94:content assessment
304:
303:
300:
299:
296:
295:
260:and see lists of
204:
203:
200:
199:
74:
73:
70:
69:
450:
404:
399:
290:
289:
286:
283:
280:
253:WikiProject Film
247:
242:
241:
240:
231:
224:
223:
213:
206:
180:
179:
176:
173:
170:
149:
144:
143:
133:
126:
125:
115:
108:
91:
85:
84:
76:
32:
31:
23:
16:
458:
457:
453:
452:
451:
449:
448:
447:
413:
412:
402:
397:
355:
331:
287:
284:
281:
278:
277:
243:
238:
236:
177:
174:
171:
168:
167:
147:Business portal
145:
138:
92:on Knowledge's
89:
12:
11:
5:
456:
454:
446:
445:
440:
435:
430:
425:
415:
414:
411:
410:
360:Energizerspark
354:
351:
350:
349:
330:
327:
326:
325:
302:
301:
298:
297:
294:
293:
291:
249:
248:
232:
220:
219:
214:
202:
201:
198:
197:
190:
184:
183:
181:
164:the discussion
151:
150:
134:
122:
121:
116:
104:
103:
97:
86:
72:
71:
68:
67:
66:
65:
55:
45:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
455:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
431:
429:
426:
424:
421:
420:
418:
409:
406:
405:
400:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:WP:NOTCATALOG
372:
371:
370:
369:
365:
361:
352:
348:
345:
341:
337:
336:
335:
328:
324:
321:
316:
315:
314:
313:
310:
292:
288:film articles
275:
271:
270:documentation
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
246:
235:
233:
230:
226:
225:
221:
218:
215:
212:
208:
195:
189:
186:
185:
182:
165:
161:
157:
156:
148:
142:
137:
135:
132:
128:
127:
123:
120:
117:
114:
110:
105:
101:
95:
87:
83:
78:
77:
63:
59:
56:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
36:
35:
34:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
394:
356:
353:Release list
332:
305:
251:
153:
100:WikiProjects
57:
47:
37:
320:LinaMishima
245:Film portal
417:Categories
274:guidelines
262:open tasks
90:Stub-class
62:discussion
52:discussion
42:discussion
403:superman
169:Business
160:business
119:Business
28:deletion
344:Jun-Dai
309:Peerpee
398:wooden
96:scale.
364:talk
329:KEEP
279:Film
264:and
217:Film
58:keep
48:keep
38:keep
188:???
419::
395:--
389:;
385:;
381:;
366:)
362:(
276:.
196:.
102::
64:.
54:.
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
