710:
regulate their environment and themselves. NLP looks at achieving goals, creating stable relationships, eliminating barriers such as fears and phobias, building self-confidence, and self-esteem, and achieving peak performance. Neuro
Linguistic Psychotherapy (NLPt) encompasses NLP as framework and set of interventions in the treatment of individuals with different psychological and/or social problems. We aimed systematically to analyse the available data regarding the effectiveness of Neuro Linguistic Psychotherapy (NLPt). Subjects and methods: The present work is a meta-analysis of studies, observational or randomized controlled trials, for evaluating the efficacy of Neuro Linguistic Programming in individuals with different psychological and/or social problems. The databases searched to identify studies in English and German language: 1. CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library; 2. PubMed; 3. ISI Web of Knowledge (include results also from Medline and the Web of Science); 4. PsycINFO (including PsycARTICLES); 5. Psyndex; 6. Deutschsprachige Diplomarbeiten der Psychologie (database of theses in Psychology in German language), 7. Social SciSearch; 8. National library of health and two NLP-specific research databases: one from the NLP Community (
838:). Results: From a total number of 425 studies, 350 were removed and considered not relevant based on the title and abstract. Included, in the final analysis, are 12 studies with numbers of participants ranging between 12 and 115 subjects. The vast majority of studies were prospective observational. The actual paper represents the first meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of NLP therapy for individuals with social/psychological problems. The overall meta-analysis found that the NLP therapy may add an overall standardized mean difference of 0.54 with a confidence interval of CI = . Conclusion: Neuro-Linguistic Psychotherapy as a psychotherapeutic modality grounded in theoretical frameworks, methodologies and interventions scientifically developed, including models developed by NLP, shows results that can hold its ground in comparison with other psychotherapeutic methods. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)" -
718:). Results: From a total number of 425 studies, 350 were removed and considered not relevant based on the title and abstract. Included, in the final analysis, are 12 studies with numbers of participants ranging between 12 and 115 subjects. The vast majority of studies were prospective observational. The actual paper represents the first meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of NLP therapy for individuals with social/psychological problems. The overall meta-analysis found that the NLP therapy may add an overall standardized mean difference of 0.54 with a confidence interval of CI = . Conclusion: Neuro-Linguistic Psychotherapy as a psychotherapeutic modality grounded in theoretical frameworks, methodologies and interventions scientifically developed, including models developed by NLP, shows results that can hold its ground in comparison with other psychotherapeutic methods. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
830:"The present work is a meta-analysis of studies, observational or randomized controlled trials, for evaluating the efficacy of Neuro Linguistic Programming in individuals with different psychological and/or social problems. The databases searched to identify studies in English and German language: 1. CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library; 2. PubMed; 3. ISI Web of Knowledge (include results also from Medline and the Web of Science); 4. PsycINFO (including PsycARTICLES); 5. Psyndex; 6. Deutschsprachige Diplomarbeiten der Psychologie (database of theses in Psychology in German language), 7. Social SciSearch; 8. National library of health and two NLP-specific research databases: one from the NLP Community (
1258:...then we could remove the redundant footnote-annotations? I suggest this merely as to attack an issue of readability. While I am indeed currently interested in to read about Neuro-Linguistic Programming, I have no interest whatsoever in spreading support or condemnation of the idea. I only wish to help see that the information available in this article is readable by whoever seeks it out. I understand why a person may feel passionately about clarifying that NLP is not science and is promoted frequently by dubious charlatans but I believe the number of people who would argue against the idea "NLP is not science" is next to nought.
158:
74:
179:
53:
277:
259:
22:
84:
907:
NLP is about and inside of the study of subjective experience. There are no facts, just how people experience in a subjective way so it's not about science. Any attempt to objectively prove subjective experience is a major issue for science, philosophy, and for wikipedia to deal with so you won't
1030:
Famousdog, it is fine for you to dispute the pseudoscience mentions regarding NLP, but if you want to continue to promote NLP as science, you'll need far more than just adding banners to the article. It's fine to dispute, but here on wikipedia we want more evidence than that to prove your beliefs
430:
I'm still looking for the
Sleight of Mouth patterns that were here before someone deleted them. Please add them back in. It was highly useful information. Now it just says "There were 14 sleight of mouth patterns and then 14 more were developed." Well, at least a list of these 28 Sleight of Mouth
331:
This describes what it is and claims, but appears to be written from an advocacy point of view - particularly the intro, which states NLP's claims as if they are facts. This is problematic given that not only is NLP documented to be a pseudoscience, but is one of the standard examples of a truly
383:
Richard
Bandler has said that NLP is more art than science. The quality of the results depends therefore not on "scientific studies" but on the skills and talents of those persons using the methods presented, much like an artist creating an image - photographer? charcoal? pen & ink? oil on
1251:
Of course, it is very important to communicate clearly that NLP is not science. However, as a wikipedian aware of this fact, the repeated skeptical annotations accompanying what appears to be a majority of the footnotes, impedes my ability to read the article. Instead of noting "source may be
709:
Background: Neuro
Linguistic Programming (NLP) Framework has enjoyed enormous popularity in the field of applied psychology. NLP has been used in business, education, law, medicine and psychotherapy to identify people’s patterns and alter their responses to stimuli, so they are better able to
637:
There is recent research that gives evidence contradicting the idea that NLP is pseudoscience. I attempted an edit that includes reference to this research. It is a meta-analysis performed in 2015 (after the talk above): -
844:
1. While some may imply that NLP is a pseudoscience, this is one perspective and not an objective fact to be stated as such (as it is actively refuted in peer reviewed research). I plan to edit the article to reflect this.
415:
I'm looking for the list of
Sleight of Mouth patterns that used to be one here. It was a really useful reference and I've been coming back to this page for years to use it, but it's no longer here. Where might I find it?
506:
In other academic leaning articles I've seen evidence of contention between viewpoints and attempts to "correct" or "revise" the history of a topic. I suspect that's at play here though have not reviewed the edit
465:
The list of specific patterns may be copyright by Robert Dilts and others. If they are included it should be in a way that does not violate the copyrights. It may be better to include the patterns on the
501:" with the term "sleight of mouth" linking back to this article. The Covert hypnosis article does not mention Robert Dilts at all other that twice in the references (once as Robert B. Dilts).
575:
This seems like a concept that Robert Dilts made up to hang a book on. There is no support for the concept outside of his work and all references to it should probably just be deleted.
1252:
unreliable" and "clarification needed" at every possible point, could we take another approach? For example, could a banner be placed atop the article that says something like:..
1088:
I don't know what you're talking about, That Guy. I'm not promoting anything, certainly not NLP. Also, you clearly missed the bit where I said "let's hold the discussion
293:
1193:
1189:
1175:
851:
If another editor feels my prose is poor and needs revising, that's fine. However, the content (especially the introduction) needs a more well rounded perspective.
653:
Reiner, Melita. Croatian-Austrian
Training Center for NLPt, Zagreb, Croatia Schütz, Peter. Oesterreichisches Training Zentrum fuer NLP&NLPt, Vienna, Austria
1317:
241:
140:
284:
264:
1261:
Is there a way to favour readability while not taking lightly the level of skepticism necessary for a person introducing themselves to NLP to do so safely?
1307:
1292:
641:
Zaharia, C., Reiner, M., & Schütz, P. (2015). Evidence-based Neuro
Linguistic Psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Psychiatria Danubina, 27(4), 355-363. -
231:
130:
524:. However, it also appears there needs to be some consolidating/merging to balance out mentions of Robert Dilts and others involved in this topic. --
1312:
1297:
207:
106:
1131:
482:
1255:"Neuro-Linguistic Programming is not an accepted scientific field. Skepticism should be applied liberally and sources examined for reliability."
1302:
1287:
417:
1089:
1001:
186:
163:
97:
58:
391:
1171:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
871:
432:
1147:
1107:
1019:
590:
33:
1038:
947:
889:
Fair enough. This is my first foray into
Knowledge (XXG) editing, so forgive me. I'll start in the talk in the main article.
817:
546:"Sleight of Mouth" is a formal phrase in NLP that should be capitalized. I know it's the title of a book by Robert Dilts.
292:
related articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
206:
related articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1236:
703:
Neuro Linguistic Programming, systematic review, Neuro Linguistic Psychotherapy, treatment effectiveness, meta analysis
874:- considering the mountains of evidence, one study in a subarticle is probably not a good place to start advocacy -
835:
715:
371:
1192:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
479:
Related to this request is I'd done a search for 'Sleight of Mouth' on Knowledge (XXG) and found two articles:
363:
421:
39:
1227:
1139:
395:
805:
436:
384:
canvas? All can create something amazing, if their skill level is high enough, and a hot mess if it isn't.
1135:
1065:
879:
337:
1273:
1269:
1241:
1211:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1199:
1110:
1071:
1042:
1022:
951:
898:
894:
883:
860:
856:
821:
813:
620:
593:
562:
559:
532:
529:
456:
440:
425:
399:
375:
367:
357:
341:
105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1138:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1000:
Regarding the recent removal of the multiple issues banner (added by myself), lets hold the discussion
289:
21:
1098:
1010:
890:
852:
831:
809:
711:
581:
332:
egregious pseudoscience (per the main article) - so an in-universe style will mislead the reader -
1159:
1196:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
730:*Intervention; *Neurolinguistic Programming; *Psychotherapy; Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation
1212:
1060:
875:
333:
89:
1265:
1148:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070610030957/http://www.sidjacobson.com/institute/history.html
555:
525:
497:
178:
157:
1219:
488:
467:
1178:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1165:
1093:
1005:
576:
1218:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1185:
1281:
514:
199:
195:
1059:
Note that the WikiProject tag is unrelated to the in-article issues-tags. Thanks, —
611:
447:
348:
836:
http://www.nlpgrup.com/bilimselarastirmalar/bilimsel-arastirmalar-4.html#Zweig154
716:
http://www.nlpgrup.com/bilimselarastirmalar/bilimsel-arastirmalar-4.html#Zweig154
485:
which is this article which claims "The concept was devised by Robert Dilts ...".
1151:
660:
651:
276:
258:
73:
52:
1184:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
203:
102:
79:
766:
Accepted: Oct 5, 2015; Revised: Sep 28, 2015; First Submitted: Jul 23, 2015
848:
2. In doing so, I plan to refer to the meta-analysis mentioned above. -
191:
908:
get far with what you're up to. NLP is objectively unprovable.
832:
http://www.nlp.de/cgi-bin/research/nlprdb.cgi?action=res_entries
712:
http://www.nlp.de/cgi-bin/research/nlprdb.cgi?action=res_entries
549:
Is sleight of mouth a sub-topic of NLP's state management field?
659:
Zaharia, Cătălin, Mind Master Association, Bucharest, Romania,
650:
Zaharia, Cătălin. Mind Master Association, Bucharest, Romania,
446:
Find a third party reliable source and propose something. ----
15:
1142:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
736:
Psychotherapy & Psychotherapeutic Counseling (3310)
483:
Methods of neuro-linguistic programming#Sleight of Mouth
470:
article as this article contains summaries of methods.
347:
Concur. Do you want to have a go at changing it? ----
841:
I plan on editing the article in the following ways
1166:
http://darwin.nap.edu/books/0309037921/html/133.html
667:
Psychiatria Danubina, Vol 27(4), 2015. pp. 355-363.
288:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
190:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1188:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
302:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Alternative medicine
1174:This message was posted before February 2018.
362:I can help. I have rewritten the lead of the
1152:http://sidjacobson.com/institute/history.html
8:
1247:Annotations Currently Crippling Readability.
1130:I have just modified one external link on
803:
543:Related to this is that I'm wondering if:
253:
152:
47:
305:Template:WikiProject Alternative medicine
1132:Methods of neuro-linguistic programming
778:Medicinska naklada - Zagreb, Croatia.
255:
154:
49:
19:
1123:External links modified (January 2018)
216:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Skepticism
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology
1318:C-Class Alternative medicine articles
7:
282:This article is within the scope of
184:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
366:article to make it more objective.
38:It is of interest to the following
1308:Low-importance Skepticism articles
1293:Low-importance psychology articles
491:which claims "it is also known as
14:
1134:. Please take a moment to review
872:Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming
644:From the abstract via PsycINFO:
520:from this article to the one on
510:For now, I've added a link, via
285:WikiProject Alternative medicine
275:
257:
177:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
1313:WikiProject Skepticism articles
1298:WikiProject Psychology articles
793:Number of Citations in Source:
760:Journal; Peer Reviewed Journal
236:This article has been rated as
219:Template:WikiProject Skepticism
135:This article has been rated as
118:Template:WikiProject Psychology
899:22:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
884:21:44, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
861:20:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
834:) and one from the NLP Group (
822:21:13, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
714:) and one from the NLP Group (
1:
1111:11:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
1072:15:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1043:13:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1023:11:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
1004:as it affects both articles.
685:Croatia : Medicinska Naklada
610:No objection to deletion ----
457:00:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
441:17:43, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
400:07:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
308:Alternative medicine articles
296:and see a list of open tasks.
210:and see a list of open tasks.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1274:04:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
1242:19:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
1303:C-Class Skepticism articles
1288:C-Class psychology articles
431:patterns would be helpful!
1334:
1205:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1127:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
870:I suggest running it past
426:20:20, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
242:project's importance scale
141:project's importance scale
1039:That Guy, From That Show!
1031:about NLP as being true.
952:19:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
948:That Guy, From That Show!
733:PsycINFO Classification:
621:19:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
594:07:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
563:01:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
533:01:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
358:04:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
342:22:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
270:
235:
172:
134:
67:
46:
670:NLM Title Abbreviation:
376:13:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
364:Representational_systems
493:conversational hypnosis
996:Multiple issues banner
327:Advocacy point of view
187:WikiProject Skepticism
98:WikiProject Psychology
28:This article is rated
763:Publication History:
633:recent advocacy edits
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1186:regular verification
299:Alternative medicine
290:Alternative medicine
265:Alternative medicine
1176:After February 2018
222:Skepticism articles
121:psychology articles
1230:InternetArchiveBot
1181:InternetArchiveBot
787:Accession Number:
757:Publication Type:
691:0353-5053 (Print)
34:content assessment
1206:
824:
808:comment added by
619:
455:
356:
324:
323:
320:
319:
316:
315:
252:
251:
248:
247:
151:
150:
147:
146:
90:Psychology portal
1325:
1240:
1231:
1204:
1203:
1182:
1163:
1105:
1096:
1068:
1063:
1017:
1008:
751:Format Covered:
724:Journal Article
673:Psychiatr Danub
618:
616:
588:
579:
519:
513:
498:sleight of mouth
454:
452:
368:AnotherPseudonym
355:
353:
310:
309:
306:
303:
300:
279:
272:
271:
261:
254:
224:
223:
220:
217:
214:
181:
174:
173:
168:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1333:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1278:
1277:
1249:
1234:
1229:
1197:
1190:have permission
1180:
1157:
1140:this simple FaQ
1125:
1103:
1099:
1094:
1066:
1061:
1015:
1011:
1006:
998:
825:
797:
791:
790:2015-54669-003
785:
779:
773:
767:
761:
755:
749:
743:
737:
731:
725:
721:Document Type:
719:
704:
698:
692:
686:
680:
674:
668:
662:
654:
635:
612:
586:
582:
577:
522:Covert hypnosis
517:
511:
489:Covert hypnosis
468:Covert hypnosis
448:
413:
349:
329:
307:
304:
301:
298:
297:
221:
218:
215:
212:
211:
166:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1331:
1329:
1321:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1305:
1300:
1295:
1290:
1280:
1279:
1248:
1245:
1224:
1223:
1216:
1169:
1168:
1154:
1146:Added archive
1124:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1101:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1013:
997:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
887:
886:
866:
801:
795:
789:
783:
777:
771:
769:Release Date:
765:
759:
753:
748:Meta Analysis
747:
741:
735:
729:
723:
708:
702:
696:
690:
684:
678:
672:
666:
658:
649:
634:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
584:
568:
567:
566:
565:
552:
551:
550:
547:
538:
537:
536:
535:
508:
504:
503:
502:
486:
474:
473:
472:
471:
460:
459:
418:98.237.252.162
412:
409:
407:
405:
404:
403:
402:
381:
380:
379:
378:
328:
325:
322:
321:
318:
317:
314:
313:
311:
294:the discussion
280:
268:
267:
262:
250:
249:
246:
245:
238:Low-importance
234:
228:
227:
225:
208:the discussion
182:
170:
169:
167:Low‑importance
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Low-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1330:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1285:
1283:
1276:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1262:
1259:
1256:
1253:
1246:
1244:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1232:
1221:
1217:
1214:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1201:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1161:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1128:
1122:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1097:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1073:
1069:
1064:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1009:
1003:
995:
953:
950:
949:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
900:
896:
892:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
868:
867:
864:
862:
858:
854:
849:
846:
842:
839:
837:
833:
828:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
800:
794:
788:
782:
776:
770:
764:
758:
752:
746:
745:Methodology:
740:
734:
728:
722:
717:
713:
707:
701:
695:
689:
683:
677:
671:
665:
661:
657:
652:
648:
645:
642:
639:
632:
622:
617:
615:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
595:
592:
589:
587:
580:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
564:
561:
557:
553:
548:
545:
544:
542:
541:
540:
539:
534:
531:
527:
523:
516:
509:
505:
500:
499:
494:
490:
487:
484:
481:
480:
478:
477:
476:
475:
469:
464:
463:
462:
461:
458:
453:
451:
445:
444:
443:
442:
438:
434:
428:
427:
423:
419:
410:
408:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
359:
354:
352:
346:
345:
344:
343:
339:
335:
326:
312:
295:
291:
287:
286:
281:
278:
274:
273:
269:
266:
263:
260:
256:
243:
239:
233:
230:
229:
226:
209:
205:
201:
200:pseudohistory
197:
196:pseudoscience
193:
189:
188:
183:
180:
176:
175:
171:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1263:
1260:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1228:
1225:
1200:source check
1179:
1173:
1170:
1129:
1126:
1100:
1037:
1012:
999:
946:
888:
876:David Gerard
865:
850:
847:
843:
840:
829:
826:
804:— Preceding
798:
792:
786:
780:
774:
768:
762:
756:
750:
744:
739:Population:
738:
732:
726:
720:
705:
699:
693:
687:
681:
676:Page Count:
675:
669:
663:
655:
646:
643:
640:
636:
613:
583:
521:
496:
492:
449:
429:
414:
406:
392:174.26.56.14
382:
350:
334:David Gerard
330:
283:
237:
185:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
1266:Harlequence
1264:Thank you.
775:Copyright:
682:Publisher:
556:Marc Kupper
526:Marc Kupper
433:73.53.49.12
1282:Categories
1237:Report bug
802:PsycINFO
799:Database:
727:Subjects:
706:Abstract:
700:Keywords:
694:Language:
507:histories.
213:Skepticism
204:skepticism
164:Skepticism
112:Psychology
103:Psychology
59:Psychology
1220:this tool
1213:this tool
1160:dead link
901:bmcdani4
863:bmcdani4
784:26609647
772:20160125
656:Address:
647:Authors:
1226:Cheers.—
891:Bmcdani4
853:Bmcdani4
818:contribs
810:Bmcdani4
806:unsigned
697:English
664:Source:
1164:tag to
1136:my edit
1067:Neonate
614:Snowded
450:Snowded
411:Request
351:Snowded
240:on the
192:science
139:on the
30:C-class
1156:Added
1095:Famous
1007:Famous
781:PMID:
754:Print
742:Human
688:ISSN:
578:Famous
36:scale.
1062:Paleo
1270:talk
1090:here
1002:here
895:talk
880:talk
857:talk
814:talk
560:talk
530:talk
515:Main
437:talk
422:talk
396:talk
390:LOL
372:talk
338:talk
202:and
1194:RfC
1150:to
1108:(c)
1102:dog
1092:."
1036:--
1020:(c)
1014:dog
945:--
796:39
591:(c)
585:dog
495:or
232:Low
131:Low
1284::
1272:)
1207:.
1202:}}
1198:{{
1162:}}
1158:{{
1070:–
897:)
882:)
859:)
827:-
820:)
816:•
679:9
554:--
518:}}
512:{{
439:)
424:)
398:)
374:)
340:)
198:,
194:,
1268:(
1239:)
1235:(
1222:.
1215:.
893:(
878:(
855:(
812:(
558:|
528:|
435:(
420:(
394:(
370:(
336:(
244:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
