77:
53:
141:
187:
169:
22:
341:
purchasers of
Expression 3 from volume licensing, or those who have legal Expression 3 licenses via now expired MSDN subscriptions. I cannot find a definitive explanation from Microsoft for this, so hawith no source to cite have not edited the main article. Perhaps someone with more knowledge about this subject could clarify?
614:
contents." Both of those pages use "content" and hence to keep things consistent, that form should be used here as well. No need to make this particular article any special. At any rate, the use of "contents" in regards to the sentence structure of this article is technically unnatural. Also, be
340:
may need clarification. There seems to be some confusion (and anger) online at the moment where the customer has found they are unable to upgrade from version 3 to 4 for free. Discussions on
Microsoft blogs seems to indicate that the free upgrade is only available to retail copies, and excludes
902:
wrong, by the way, or at least strongly unidiomatic, despite what you said above. I showed links to many good books (remember, it was Google Books, real printed books, not just Web pages) using "Web content". If you try the same search for "Web contents", you find almost exclusively books by
906:. So I know that I'm right, but I also know that you're a very regular user and I will never be able to make a correction if the WP establishment for some reason doesn't want it to stand. We'll leave these comments here in case crazy consensus changes to the correct view in future. Cheers.
811:
Style and formatting should be consistent within an article, though not necessarily throughout
Knowledge. Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason. Edit warring over optional styles is
784:
In this light, 96.253.76.142's inaccurate sentence must not be treated as a super-huge super-careless mistake in good faith, but rather as a lie in the continuation of the past harassment efforts. Note that, I am watching his contribution log now. They say keep the enemies
479:
476:
473:
470:
934:. And you ignored the dictionary and examples that I provided. Overall, you are playing unfair. This style never succeeds in Knowledge. (It does not face immediate defeat, mind you. But eventually, it does not last.)
283:
Couldn't we do a kind of screenshot where all the applications are side aligned, like from the Office '07 screenshot? I mean, I've got all the products so I'd do it if you want me to, but would it be
687:
section. Just so this discussion doesnt get out of hand, I would suggest to reword the sentences as a compromise, but only if this discussion's initial editor makes another argument. If not then the
821:
section. (Seems as irrelevant as WP:WORKINPROGRESS, if not more irrelevant.) Overall, Codename Lisa's first revert was done with the wrong reason but ended up being justifiable. That's why we have
1143:
1029:
440:
is one of the commonly used but nevertheless flawed discussions in
Knowledge. You see, even if you were correct, you still aren't at liberty to to change the word because per
926:, unfortunately. You called me prejudiced and called writers that opposed your view worthless because of being Chinese (a racist comment). There is of course, resisting the
817:
Second, the sentence structure perfectly allows a plural here; even so, a pseudo-plural is not actually plural. Third, I have no clue as to what he (or she) means by
448:, editors are not allowed to switch from one correct form to another. To change, you must also show that the use of the word "contents" is wrong. But it isn't. See:
1163:
1128:
1061:
1057:
1043:
383:
227:
125:
1138:
706:
Yes, that's what I was implying; it has nothing to do with national ties, hence both "content" and "contents" can be used. (I hope I understood well.) As for
386:
1030:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090725030606/http://www.uxpassion.com/2009/07/expression-studio-3-overview-expression-blend-3-design-web-and-media-overview/
233:
131:
904:
841:
Even funnier, I went to see if I could get third-party help on this, and found the WP section on "Resolving content disputes". Content, not contents!
389:
1168:
1158:
1123:
1033:
490:
337:
This sentence: "On June 7, 2010, Expression Studio 4 was released. Expression Studio 4 is a free upgrade for licensed
Expression Studio 3 users."
1133:
318:
203:
101:
907:
842:
767:
535:
411:
392:
806:(an ArbCom ruling) at all; even if it had, essays do not have any executive powers against a ruling of Arbitration Committee. It says:
1039:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
300:
778:
of having been CL's sock-puppets and
Microsoft employees (although he/she used a slightly different IP address.) Another case of
1153:
194:
174:
84:
58:
1148:
150:
63:
1104:
437:
33:
1013:
251:
453:
391:; also check any good dictionary. Lisa, please overlook your prejudices and check this out. My edit should stand.
864:
818:
684:
1060:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
867:
probably has a "table of contents" not "table of content". Wow, it is the Apple navbox all over again. Remember?
1034:
http://www.uxpassion.com/2009/07/expression-studio-3-overview-expression-blend-3-design-web-and-media-overview/
799:
680:
382:) is material created for a publication. See these convincing searches in Google Books: "content of this book"
374:
keeps wrongly reverting me. "Contents" are things in a container ("the contents of a box"), while "content" (a
322:
21:
539:
459:
1095:
1021:
958:
920:
It is unlikely. ArbCom rulings are not overridden by consensus. You see, the majority of your arguments are
911:
881:
846:
747:
662:
583:
509:
415:
396:
774:
of
Codename Lisa and nothing else. As part of those malicious conduct he/she has previously accused me and
1017:
830:
572:
of the Web site, however, compensate for its traditional image by being versatile and very user-friendly.'
97:
1079:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1067:
356:
296:
39:
1020:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
606:: While both forms are technically correct, they are only used in two instances in this article, "...
314:
780:
269:
202:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
100:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
954:
877:
771:
743:
658:
579:
527:
505:
371:
265:
1064:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1080:
714:
because MOS:STABILITY is about the optional styles and has nothing to do with work in progress.
646:, we cannot. It dictates that the only reason for changing from one correct form to another is
987:
826:
863:! Also "funnier" implies we agreed on something funny beforehand, which we didn't. Although,
860:
672:
639:
611:
445:
292:
1087:
1109:
990:
962:
915:
885:
850:
834:
751:
701:
666:
625:
587:
543:
513:
419:
400:
361:
326:
272:
258:
1046:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
464:
350:
1086:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1117:
931:
927:
822:
803:
711:
707:
688:
676:
650:
national ties. Cross-article consistency is never given as a valid reason for change.
643:
607:
441:
255:
984:
603:
798:'s comments â although made in good faith, I am sure â are flawed at best. First,
1053:
795:
763:
692:
633:
616:
407:
353:
could be merged into this article, to consolidate the information in one place.
683:, which is why this discussion was started. I've made my case due to the MOS's
140:
76:
52:
1052:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
922:
568:
Information made available by a website or other electronic medium ... 'The
199:
186:
168:
93:
770:
shows that his contributions to
Knowledge so far has strictly consisted of
775:
560:
Lying is your latest tactic? Surprising. Time to ask for a third opinion.
198:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
89:
983:
Are ArbCom rulings overridden by you being perma-blocked for fraud?
727:
But if you aren't returning, I can invoke additional third opinions.
859:
Well then, please don't convert "content" to "contents" there, per
15:
139:
1024:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
367:"Digital media contents" should be "digital media content"
903:
non-native speakers (authors with Chinese names, etc.):
675:
but rather how the sentences are structured. Nor does
790:
Now, I have some additional comments too. Call it a
88:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1144:
Start-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
1056:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
232:This article has not yet received a rating on the
130:This article has not yet received a rating on the
333:Free upgrade from Expression 3 to 4 clarification
1042:This message was posted before February 2018.
456:(or you can switch to the British version too)
8:
530:has graciously provided, the noncount form (
406:And, of course, Knowledge has an article on
615:civil. No need to accuse someone of lying.
19:
1012:I have just modified one external link on
766:'s civility comment, one should know that
163:
47:
563:Just a quotation from my Oxford source:
526:According to the dictionary links that
491:Corpus of Contemporary American English
165:
49:
1005:External links modified (January 2018)
1164:Unknown-importance Microsoft articles
1129:Unknown-importance Computing articles
295:, Exiled to the Valley of the Snow. (
7:
1139:Unknown-importance software articles
465:Merriam Webster Learner's Dictionary
192:This article is within the scope of
82:This article is within the scope of
710:, I feel you have confused it with
38:It is of interest to the following
534:) should be used in this context.
454:Oxford American English Dictionary
14:
1016:. Please take a moment to review
781:The socks, the socks are calling!
802:(an essay) has no conflict with
768:96.253.76.142's contribution log
691:can hold. I won't be returning.
185:
167:
75:
51:
20:
681:Knowledge is a work in progress
212:Knowledge:WikiProject Microsoft
110:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing
1169:WikiProject Microsoft articles
1159:Start-Class Microsoft articles
1124:Start-Class Computing articles
991:23:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
259:08:37, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
215:Template:WikiProject Microsoft
113:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
1134:Start-Class software articles
679:hold any ground here because
273:08:44, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
206:and see a list of open tasks.
148:This article is supported by
104:and see a list of open tasks.
1110:10:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
671:This has nothing to do with
1014:Microsoft Expression Studio
327:00:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
252:Microsoft Expression Studio
1185:
1073:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1009:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
493:for advanced verification.
362:09:35, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
308:20:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
234:project's importance scale
132:project's importance scale
963:11:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
916:20:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
886:19:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
865:Knowledge:Content dispute
851:19:13, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
835:12:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
752:01:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
702:01:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
667:01:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
626:01:04, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
588:00:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
544:00:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
231:
180:
147:
129:
70:
46:
514:20:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
420:20:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
401:20:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
385:, "advertising content"
460:Random House Dictionary
1154:All Computing articles
814:
574:
469:Google Book examples:
410:, not "Web contents"!
144:
98:information technology
28:This article is rated
1149:All Software articles
809:
566:
311:no i don't think so
195:WikiProject Microsoft
143:
85:WikiProject Computing
1054:regular verification
819:contested vocabulary
685:contested vocabulary
151:WikiProject Software
1044:After February 2018
898:I think "contents"
610:contents." and "...
1098:InternetArchiveBot
1049:InternetArchiveBot
932:assuming bad faith
528:User:Codename Lisa
438:Search engine test
372:User:Codename Lisa
218:Microsoft articles
145:
116:Computing articles
34:content assessment
1074:
800:WP:WORKINPROGRESS
489:You can also use
360:
349:Information from
317:comment added by
248:
247:
244:
243:
240:
239:
162:
161:
158:
157:
1176:
1108:
1099:
1072:
1071:
1050:
699:
637:
623:
612:H.264/MPEG-4 AVC
388:, "Web content"
380:uncountable noun
359:
357:Northamerica1000
354:
329:
304:
220:
219:
216:
213:
210:
189:
182:
181:
171:
164:
118:
117:
114:
111:
108:
79:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1114:
1113:
1102:
1097:
1065:
1058:have permission
1048:
1022:this simple FaQ
1007:
762:In response to
693:
631:
617:
369:
355:
347:
335:
312:
291:
281:
250:Should this be
217:
214:
211:
208:
207:
115:
112:
109:
106:
105:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1182:
1180:
1172:
1171:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1126:
1116:
1115:
1092:
1091:
1084:
1037:
1036:
1028:Added archive
1006:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
952:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
891:
890:
889:
888:
871:
870:
869:
868:
854:
853:
838:
837:
815:
807:
787:
786:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
741:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
656:
652:
651:
638:Actually, per
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
578:
575:
564:
561:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
519:
518:
517:
516:
503:
497:
496:
495:
494:
484:
483:
482:
481:
467:
462:
457:
450:
449:
432:
431:
430:
429:
423:
422:
368:
365:
351:Creature House
346:
343:
334:
331:
319:165.84.197.100
280:
277:
276:
275:
246:
245:
242:
241:
238:
237:
230:
224:
223:
221:
204:the discussion
190:
178:
177:
172:
160:
159:
156:
155:
146:
136:
135:
128:
122:
121:
119:
102:the discussion
80:
68:
67:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1181:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1119:
1112:
1111:
1106:
1101:
1100:
1089:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1069:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1010:
1004:
992:
989:
986:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
964:
960:
956:
955:Codename Lisa
953:
951:Best regards,
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
933:
929:
925:
924:
919:
918:
917:
913:
909:
908:86.136.110.44
905:
901:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
887:
883:
879:
878:Codename Lisa
875:
874:
873:
872:
866:
862:
858:
857:
856:
855:
852:
848:
844:
843:86.136.110.44
840:
839:
836:
832:
828:
827:Fleet Command
824:
820:
816:
813:
812:unacceptable.
808:
805:
804:MOS:STABILITY
801:
797:
794:if you wish:
793:
789:
788:
783:
782:
777:
773:
772:Wiki-hounding
769:
765:
761:
760:
753:
749:
745:
744:Codename Lisa
742:
740:Best regards,
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
713:
709:
708:MOS:STABILITY
705:
704:
703:
700:
698:
697:
690:
689:MOS:STABILITY
686:
682:
678:
677:MOS:STABILITY
674:
673:national ties
670:
669:
668:
664:
660:
659:Codename Lisa
657:
655:Best regards,
654:
653:
649:
645:
644:MOS:STABILITY
641:
635:
630:
629:
628:
627:
624:
622:
621:
613:
609:
608:digital media
605:
601:
589:
585:
581:
580:Codename Lisa
576:
573:
571:
565:
562:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
545:
541:
537:
536:96.253.76.142
533:
529:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
515:
511:
507:
506:Codename Lisa
504:
502:Best regards,
501:
500:
499:
498:
492:
488:
487:
486:
485:
480:
477:
474:
471:
468:
466:
463:
461:
458:
455:
452:
451:
447:
443:
442:MOS:STABILITY
439:
436:
435:
434:
433:
427:
426:
425:
424:
421:
417:
413:
412:86.136.110.44
409:
405:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
393:86.136.110.44
390:
387:
384:
381:
377:
373:
366:
364:
363:
358:
352:
345:Suggest merge
344:
342:
338:
332:
330:
328:
324:
320:
316:
309:
306:
305:
302:
301:Contributions
298:
294:
288:
286:
278:
274:
271:
267:
263:
262:
261:
260:
257:
253:
235:
229:
226:
225:
222:
205:
201:
197:
196:
191:
188:
184:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
166:
153:
152:
142:
138:
137:
133:
127:
124:
123:
120:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:
81:
78:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1096:
1093:
1068:source check
1047:
1041:
1038:
1011:
1008:
921:
899:
810:
791:
779:
695:
694:
647:
619:
618:
599:
598:
569:
567:
531:
379:
375:
370:
348:
339:
336:
310:
307:
290:
289:
284:
282:
249:
193:
149:
83:
40:WikiProjects
930:revert and
876:Concerned,
764:User:KirtZJ
648:very strong
408:Web content
313:âPreceding
293:Akira-otomo
266:··gracefool
30:Start-class
1118:Categories
1105:Report bug
923:ad hominem
577:Concerned,
279:Screenshot
1088:this tool
1081:this tool
861:WP:ENGVAR
640:WP:ENGVAR
446:WP:ENGVAR
376:mass noun
254:instead?
209:Microsoft
200:Microsoft
175:Microsoft
107:Computing
94:computing
90:computers
59:Computing
1094:Cheers.â
776:User:Jeh
570:contents
315:unsigned
285:suitable
256:Enochlau
64:Software
1018:my edit
985:Equinox
785:closer!
600:Comment
532:content
264:Moved.
928:WP:BRD
823:WP:BRD
796:KirtZJ
712:WP:CCC
696:âKirtZ
634:KirtZJ
620:âKirtZ
602:, per
96:, and
36:scale.
604:WP:3O
378:, or
959:talk
912:talk
882:talk
847:talk
831:talk
748:talk
663:talk
642:and
584:talk
540:talk
510:talk
444:and
416:talk
397:talk
323:talk
299:-|-
297:Talk
1062:RfC
1032:to
428:Hi.
228:???
126:???
1120::
1075:.
1070:}}
1066:{{
961:)
914:)
900:is
884:)
849:)
833:)
825:.
792:4O
750:)
665:)
586:)
542:)
512:)
478:,
475:,
472:,
418:)
399:)
325:)
287:?
92:,
62::
1107:)
1103:(
1090:.
1083:.
988:â
957:(
910:(
880:(
845:(
829:(
746:(
661:(
636::
632:@
582:(
538:(
508:(
414:(
395:(
321:(
303:)
270:âș
268:|
236:.
154:.
134:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
