609:
in 2012, the need for binary compiled code plugins for web browsers was losing market share. Microsoft abandoned forward
Silverlight development as it was not massively adopted by paying corporate customers. Remember, corporate technology decision makers got cold feet when no versions of Windows NT and no versions of SQL SErver were released from 2001 - 2005 even though Microsoft sold a pay as you go licensing scheme in 2000 promising more frequent releases. Combine all and you get reluctant corporate decision makers which did not want to adopt yet another possibly dead Microsoft technology. It's common for companies to wait 1 to 2 years after a tecnology is released to evaluate it for implementation to ensure 1) the technology will be supported with one or more major release already released, 2) the software vendor has long term commitment to supporting the product, 3) A decent sized and growing pool of possible workers to staff projects, 4) A good sized and growing third party support for add-ins and extras. Also, a competing rich web environment ASP.NET MVC was in version 2 as of 2010. Hence, no rush to adopt Silverlight.
243:
446:
505:
478:
573:
386:
359:
211:
328:
608:
Silverlight was to provide
Microsoft with a rich web experience comparable to Adobe Flash. When Apple Steve Jobs announced in 2010 that Flash was not going to be on the iPhone, iPad - Microsoft was unlikely to get Silverlight on Apple devices. Combine that with the near completion status of HTML5
791:
Article says "Silverlight's proprietary nature is a concern to competition since it may harm the open nature of the World Wide Web. Advocates of free software are also concerned
Silverlight could be another example of Microsoft's embrace, extend and extinguish strategy." Really? Still, in 2018?
864:
I was the
Silverlight Media Strategist at Microsoft. XML was broadly considered a great idea and a critical feature internally. A goal for Silverlight was to help Microsoft's DevDiv sell authoring tools, including Expression Design, a GUI editor for XAML
868:
Not all of the potential was realized in the end. The hope was that XAML from .net WPF would be cross compatible and could be ported into
Silverlight, although there was no mechanism to keep the implementations in sync so that wound up not being true.
153:
616:
701:
948:
254:
671:
147:
661:
202:
733:
729:
715:
943:
44:
563:
436:
79:
933:
903:
702:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071220180447/http://www.java-entrepreneur.com/50226711/adobe_ceo_questions_microsoft_silverlight_crossplatform_commitment.php
553:
426:
190:
705:
85:
923:
529:
402:
913:
691:
460:
269:
893:
672:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100210194341/http://msftkitchen.com/2009/12/windows-mobile-7-silverlight-applications-ie-mobile-7-and-more.html
264:
662:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130302062555/http://blogs.msdn.com/b/slsymbian/archive/2010/07/06/announcing-silverlight-for-symbian-rtm.aspx
198:
194:
30:
681:
928:
898:
839:
Internally, even proponents of the technology thought
Extensible Application Markup Language as a concept was a bad idea from the start
620:
938:
918:
845:
is provided as a reference, but I think that what the author of the blog was saying is not that XAML was a bad idea per se, but that
675:
512:
483:
393:
364:
260:
99:
870:
711:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
168:
665:
582:
488:
104:
20:
135:
263:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
74:
958:
339:
953:
908:
65:
455:
369:
776:
129:
242:
854:
842:
210:
185:
125:
109:
732:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
706:
http://www.java-entrepreneur.com/50226711/adobe_ceo_questions_microsoft_silverlight_crossplatform_commitment.php
221:
345:
175:
767:
692:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100531081128/http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flv/pdf/video_file_format_spec_v9.pdf
647:
874:
612:
643:
525:
55:
850:
751:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
739:
639:
528:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
401:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
24:
811:
Today is 12 October 2021. Is there confirmation that
Microsoft has terminated support for Silverlight?
682:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130615150307/http://blog.anta.net/2008/03/04/nokia-to-enable-silverlight/
646:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
70:
695:
327:
161:
141:
676:
http://msftkitchen.com/2009/12/windows-mobile-7-silverlight-applications-ie-mobile-7-and-more.html
226:
736:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
666:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/slsymbian/archive/2010/07/06/announcing-silverlight-for-symbian-rtm.aspx
752:
685:
51:
223:
759:
797:
718:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
758:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
725:
887:
824:
445:
225:
878:
858:
827:
801:
781:
624:
572:
504:
477:
724:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
793:
521:
398:
385:
358:
655:
812:
517:
397:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
696:
https://www.adobe.com/devnet/flv/pdf/video_file_format_spec_v9.pdf
321:
227:
15:
837:
I think that the following statement is at least inaccurate:
686:
http://blog.anta.net/2008/03/04/nokia-to-enable-silverlight/
571:
444:
650:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
787:
Microsoft harming the open nature of the World Wide Web
299:
160:
516:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
273:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
833:
Disputing the statement about XAML being a bad idea
728:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
174:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
949:B-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
714:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
610:
472:
353:
278:
237:
849:was a bad idea (i.e. "XAML + notepad").--
638:I have just modified 6 external links on
656:http://silverlight.net/learn/mobile.aspx
255:Engineering and technology good articles
617:2600:1700:D591:5F10:70A2:25C5:A17C:82ED
474:
355:
325:
631:External links modified (January 2018)
538:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
411:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Microsoft
7:
944:Unknown-importance software articles
510:This article is within the scope of
391:This article is within the scope of
344:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
934:High-importance Computing articles
904:High-importance Microsoft articles
14:
642:. Please take a moment to review
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
503:
476:
384:
357:
326:
241:
209:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
654:Corrected formatting/usage for
558:This article has been rated as
431:This article has been rated as
924:WikiProject Microsoft articles
541:Template:WikiProject Computing
414:Template:WikiProject Microsoft
259:nominee, but did not meet the
1:
914:High-importance .NET articles
580:This article is supported by
532:and see a list of open tasks.
453:This article is supported by
405:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
894:Former good article nominees
828:12:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
782:11:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
625:04:39, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
975:
929:B-Class Computing articles
899:B-Class Microsoft articles
847:XAML without a design tool
745:(last update: 5 June 2024)
635:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
564:project's importance scale
437:project's importance scale
267:. Editors may also seek a
939:B-Class software articles
919:WikiProject .NET articles
859:08:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
579:
557:
498:
452:
430:
379:
352:
281:
277:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
802:02:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
879:18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
959:All Computing articles
576:
526:information technology
449:
334:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
954:All Software articles
909:B-Class .NET articles
640:Microsoft Silverlight
575:
513:WikiProject Computing
448:
394:WikiProject Microsoft
338:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
261:good article criteria
249:Microsoft Silverlight
203:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
25:Microsoft Silverlight
726:regular verification
583:WikiProject Software
307:Good article nominee
105:No original research
716:After February 2018
770:InternetArchiveBot
721:InternetArchiveBot
577:
544:Computing articles
450:
417:Microsoft articles
340:content assessment
282:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
746:
627:
615:comment added by
598:
597:
594:
593:
590:
589:
471:
470:
467:
466:
320:
319:
316:
315:
234:
233:
66:Assume good faith
43:
966:
851:TheLoneTraveller
821:
818:
815:
780:
771:
744:
743:
722:
604:Misses the point
546:
545:
542:
539:
536:
507:
500:
499:
494:
491:
480:
473:
456:WikiProject .NET
419:
418:
415:
412:
409:
388:
381:
380:
375:
372:
361:
354:
337:
331:
330:
322:
302:
279:
245:
238:
228:
214:
213:
204:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
974:
973:
969:
968:
967:
965:
964:
963:
884:
883:
835:
819:
816:
813:
809:
789:
774:
769:
737:
730:have permission
720:
648:this simple FaQ
633:
606:
560:High-importance
543:
540:
537:
534:
533:
493:High‑importance
492:
486:
461:High-importance
433:High-importance
416:
413:
410:
407:
406:
374:High‑importance
373:
367:
335:
298:
230:
229:
224:
201:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
972:
970:
962:
961:
956:
951:
946:
941:
936:
931:
926:
921:
916:
911:
906:
901:
896:
886:
885:
882:
881:
866:
834:
831:
808:
805:
788:
785:
764:
763:
756:
709:
708:
700:Added archive
698:
690:Added archive
688:
680:Added archive
678:
670:Added archive
668:
660:Added archive
658:
632:
629:
605:
602:
600:
596:
595:
592:
591:
588:
587:
578:
568:
567:
556:
550:
549:
547:
530:the discussion
508:
496:
495:
481:
469:
468:
465:
464:
451:
441:
440:
429:
423:
422:
420:
403:the discussion
389:
377:
376:
362:
350:
349:
343:
332:
318:
317:
314:
313:
310:
303:
295:
294:
291:
288:
284:
283:
275:
274:
246:
232:
231:
222:
220:
219:
216:
215:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
971:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
935:
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
917:
915:
912:
910:
907:
905:
902:
900:
897:
895:
892:
891:
889:
880:
876:
872:
867:
863:
862:
861:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
832:
830:
829:
826:
822:
806:
804:
803:
799:
795:
786:
784:
783:
778:
773:
772:
761:
757:
754:
750:
749:
748:
741:
735:
731:
727:
723:
717:
712:
707:
703:
699:
697:
693:
689:
687:
683:
679:
677:
673:
669:
667:
663:
659:
657:
653:
652:
651:
649:
645:
641:
636:
630:
628:
626:
622:
618:
614:
603:
601:
585:
584:
574:
570:
569:
565:
561:
555:
552:
551:
548:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
509:
506:
502:
501:
497:
490:
485:
482:
479:
475:
462:
459:(assessed as
458:
457:
447:
443:
442:
438:
434:
428:
425:
424:
421:
404:
400:
396:
395:
390:
387:
383:
382:
378:
371:
366:
363:
360:
356:
351:
347:
341:
333:
329:
324:
323:
311:
309:
308:
304:
301:
297:
296:
292:
289:
286:
285:
280:
276:
272:
271:
266:
262:
258:
257:
256:
250:
247:
244:
240:
239:
236:
218:
217:
212:
208:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
846:
838:
836:
810:
790:
768:
765:
740:source check
719:
713:
710:
637:
634:
611:— Preceding
607:
599:
581:
559:
511:
454:
432:
392:
346:WikiProjects
306:
305:
300:July 2, 2007
270:reassessment
268:
253:
252:
248:
235:
206:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
871:15.248.7.41
265:renominated
148:free images
31:not a forum
888:Categories
777:Report bug
312:Not listed
843:blog page
760:this tool
753:this tool
535:Computing
522:computing
518:computers
484:Computing
408:Microsoft
399:Microsoft
365:Microsoft
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
766:Cheers.—
613:unsigned
489:Software
207:100Â days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
644:my edit
562:on the
435:on the
336:B-class
290:Process
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
865:files.
807:Update
524:, and
342:scale.
293:Result
251:was a
126:Google
191:Index
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
875:talk
855:talk
841:. A
825:Talk
798:talk
794:Nurg
621:talk
554:High
427:High
370:.NET
287:Date
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
734:RfC
704:to
694:to
684:to
674:to
664:to
176:TWL
890::
877:)
857:)
823:|
800:)
747:.
742:}}
738:{{
623:)
520:,
487::
463:).
368::
205::
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
873:(
853:(
820:P
817:I
814:J
796:(
779:)
775:(
762:.
755:.
619:(
586:.
566:.
439:.
348::
199:2
195:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
