Knowledge

Talk:Mike Kelly (Australian politician)

Source đź“ť

1198:
views are absolutely consonant with Kelly's in this regard. But the simple fact is that he has significantly intervened on a number of public policy matters, so much so that they drew media comment at the time. If significant matters relating to an individual's past policy positions - especially for a politician - are not suitable for Wiki, then what is? How he trims his moustache? So I again ask you to either provide SPECIFIC examples of a lack of neutrality in the Revised version or permit it through. If it is just your "view" that the article implies criticism of Kelly - rather than demonstrable passages in the article itself - then is the entire Wiki project to be held in abeyance, subject to suitable feelings on your part? I reiterate - EACH AND EVERY POINT IS APPROPRIATELY FOOTNOTED, at a standard which would be acceptable for university level. You you also note that I do not hide behind Pseudonyms or Pen Names - I have sufficient confidence in the accuracy of my work so as to use my own name.
538: 1567:
quoted on would have been opinions I did not personally share and certainly would not act upon post-employment. Michael Danby has made extensive comment - indeed, it may be the main reason for his notability - on the subject, and indeed occupies a nearly unique position within Australian politics. If Mike Kelly were to do the same now that he is in politics, then of course it would attract attention in reliable sources, and then do so here. Until then, I'm seeing very little reason to add stuff to the article which is not central to his notability, which may violate
1828:
Bulletin, and that only on the one occasion. Outside of NewsBank, the Northern Territory Courier gave a bit more detail, but nothing more. As far as I can tell, Kelly was responding privately to a suggestion that he had only seen service from behind a desk, by claiming to have used his rifle when moving a prisioner while on duty in Somalia. That seems to be pretty much it. It feels like undue weight and a bit of a beat-up, and the real issue, if there is one, is his decision not to support the change in the defence pension, rather than this claim. -
864: 910: 1498:) although assumed it was highly unlikely to be the same person. We've had issues previously with staffers (both Labor and Liberal) editing articles about their boss's opponents in times past and most of them ended up indefinitely blocked from editing because they couldn't separate their strongly-held views or motives from the need to edit encyclopaedically and neutrally which exists here - clearly that's a situation we'd like to avoid as no doubt your expertise could be utilised in a productive way to assist our project. 743: 840: 505: 680: 521: 757: 712: 594: 566: 489: 1128:
politician thru, are you? As for your suggestion "we're not actually here to raise the 'policy contradictions inherent in a politician's position' - that's the job of blogosphere and opinion pages", I suggest you re-read the Trent Lott, George Wallace and Strom Thurmond Wiki biographies. I also note that the 'excuse' has changed - it was POV, now it is 'synthesis'. Can't win can I? Peter Phelps
374: 767: 888: 736: 244: 446: 435: 424: 656: 314: 929: 275: 604: 413: 402: 849: 722: 512: 289: 2099:
Agreed. Kenny, obviously, is neither a neutral nor (as a blog) really a reliable source, and as a single commentator what he thinks of the matter doesn't indicate notability. If this were to blow up, obviously, there might be cause for including this, although in NPOV language without things like "to
2042:
Just to clarify, I have no connection with Mike Kelly or the Labor Party. My only interest in this article is in regard to the usual issues with any BLP. My concerns with the addition pretty much Mirror Bidgee and Timeshift - the only claim that there is a controversy so far comes from a blog post by
1843:
I agree - this isn't even a storm in a teacup. It's not even the actual issue being discussed in the news article (which is Kelly's attitude towards a private members bill - the story itself is rather disingenuous in that it doesn't acknowledge that as a member of the ALP Kelly is expected to tow the
1827:
At least one user wants to keep it, so it made sense to bring it here. My concern is that it seems like a remarkably minor incident, and I can't find any evidence that it was a significant statement. I checked NewsBank, and the only newspaper I can find there that covered the story was the Townsville
1197:
Are you sure you read the revised version? The quotation that you cite as objectionable was actually removed from the Revised version! Moreover, you are absolutely wrong to assume that this article is "intended primarily to attack Kelly over his views on the Israel-Palestine conflict". My personal
1817:
In 2011, Mike Kelly caused controversy when he claimed to have used his rifle on operational service in every way possible, including "butt stroke and bayonet". He made the claim while defending his decision not to support a private members bill to bring defence pension indexation in line with other
1566:
Very simple. We don't know what Mike Kelly's attitudes are on this subject beyond a few scattered comments which may or may not have been his own opinion. I've worked in senior customer service positions where I was in effect an official advocate for my organisation and many things I could likely be
1077:
What was this pulled? Everything in the entry was appropriately referenced - much better referenced than the usual Wiki fare? What examples are there of POV - I'll get rid of them? Since when are the policy contradictions inherent in a politician's position not up for mention? "and didn't really
2460:
The subject of this article is still active in Parliament, but right now it's not clear what he's about. I propose some restructuring - just so it's not a meandering set of points. I've entered his involvement with JPCIS and I can see that his concern for security in the new environment is going to
1732:
I've reverted your edit as several of the 'Criticisms' were spurious (no criticism was identified or it was a disagreement between public figures) and most were improperly referenced. Moreover, as is clear from the above post, it's clear that the post was added by an editor seeking to advance their
1483:
Agreed, it is abysmal and needs fixing. I've removed one large section with nothing to do with the former member (which also makes insinuations about him) and removed three large quotes from the article which, given the sources were linked, were not necessary to be republished on Knowledge. Also, I
1127:
So if I detail these matters it becomes "minutesque". And presumably if I'd been briefer, you would have pulled it and accused me of leaving out contextual detail. OK - I'l have a look at it and rewrite it. But I suspect that whatever I do, you're not going to allow any critical facts on a Labor
1174:
In my view, both the version you added and the one you now propose are clearly slanted, biased, and intended primarily to attack Kelly over his views on the Israel-Palestine conflict. It also attaches undue weight to that argument - while a mention of Kelly's sometimes controversial views on the
2011:
would be good? First I've heard of this, the sourced is a personal opinion blog and is only supported by the blog. I'm going to need to see more media coverage of this "controversy". Also I may have photographed Kelly but I have no POV on him, but I've done the same (photograph) to many pollies
1870:
Kelly attracted controversy when, during an appearance on Sky Television, he made, what one commmentator regarded as "the most horrible slur I can recall in federal politics." Kelly, speaking about the Coalition's pursuit of Thompson, and to the disbelief of his fellow panel-members, said "The
1690:
I have just added a Criticisms section that should be fairly unbias. Seeing this discussion it will more than likley be deleted. just before you guys do that just spare a thought that there are some serious concerns about Kelly and he hold a very infuletial postion in the Gov so this should be
1670:
I was actually at the election meeting that was held across the road from the council chambers in Queanbeyan. I am actually a Labor voter as most people were that was there that night. Dr Phelbs questions to Kelly where quite reasonable at the time, the problem was that he would not answer the
1408:
what you object to. That is quite unreasonable on your part. Is it possible to post the article in parts somewhere and let's have a genuine debate about the accuracy or otherwise of my FULLY REFERENCED article? And while we're on the subject, why don't you guys do anything about the abysmal
1403:
I was a professional historian before I became a political staffer - am I supposed to put my brain on hold because I have some involvement in the matter? But this is the crux: If you have a SPECIFIC objection to any particular phrase or sentance, then point it out, but please don't ask me to
1345:
I was a professional historian before I became a staffer. Show me, with specific examples, where I am "not neutral enough" in my recitation of the facts. Everything I have included has been the subject of a great deal of research, reaching back almost a year. Show me where I have misled or
1093:
It was written more like a response to a uni essay titled "Discuss..." rather than an encyclopaedic article in accordance with Knowledge's norms and standards. None of the events elaborated in minutesque detail actually add to any understanding of the person or his notability, and if you read
1950:
At this stage I'm not inclined to support including the text unless the statement makes a lot more impact. That Chris Kenny was upset isn't surprising in itself, and not enough to really justify including it as a controversy. However if it becomes a major issue then things would change. -
1256:
Firstly, your edit actually removed the main text of your proposed revision, which I kept so that others can have a look at it because I may be wrong. Restoring is hard due to the nature of the edit, and I'm not sure that you meant to do it, so I'll just point out it can be reached at
1525:
Lastly, there are formatting and referencing issues with the article, but they are just minor quibbles and I'll be happy to assist you in correcting these if you wish. (note, these are my views only and I will be happy to yield if a consensus develops against the above statements)
1314:, there is a legal and moral duty to make sure that everything is absolutely perfect. I believe that your draft, while improved, still has some way to go. If you wish to look at what we consider to be a "good article" biography on an Australian political figure, take a look at 2584: 854: 2504: 2509: 1871:
relentless focus on this individual has one outcome in mind. What is that they actually want? Do they want to see a young mother by a graveside weeping, is that the outcome they are looking for? Because this is what they said they want to happen.”
2579: 2350: 1098:, I independently came to the same conclusion as the person who removed the content and decided Knowledge should basically start again from scratch with this one, and am quite happy to support that decision. I strongly suggest reading 1927:
on talk in order to be able to re-add it" was beaten by Bilby's revision summary of "rv - sorry, but this needs to be discussed before including, especially with potential POV problems". It would also be wise to advise LowLarynx of
164: 1179:" does not belong on Knowledge. Your new proposed version is marginally better, but is still fundamentally flawed because it is written in such a way to be a criticism of Kelly, rather than as a neutral encyclopædia article. 1671:
questions, he actually would answer other questions that night either. Also Dr Phelps was fairly badly treated by the media in canberra/queanbeyan which has a notorious Left wing bias, his words where quoted out of context.
1224:
Moreover, if the political views and actions of a politician (both before he enters and once in Parliament) are not appropriate for mention in a politician's Wiki biography, why do these appear in the entry on Kevin Rudd?
1571:, and is at the behest of someone who, if their claims to identity are correct (how do we know this isn't an effort to smear the real Peter Phelps?), has a past history of attempting to publicise these views elsewhere. 2554: 694: 2283:
I question whether this is really a significant part of his ministerial career, but the text largely checks out against an ABC News report, which I've added as a reference, along with a tweak to the material.
954:
Can't find biographical information, though thought a page was needed considering the importance of the marginal seat Col Kelly is contesting in the Aus 2007 election. Bio info would be appreciated, thanks
2351:
https://web.archive.org/web/20101022233434/http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/somalia-to-edenmonaro-how-mike-kelly-fought-a-murderous-warlord-all-the-way-to-a-firing-squad/238656.aspx
964:
After my original article was pulled because of allegedly too much POV and 'synthesis', I have re-written it and intend to post, unless complainants identify SPECIFIC concerns of bias with this material
1054:
I wonder if it might be worth getting that account renamed. The person behind it is either incredibly stupid (if it is who it claims to be), or someone engaging in not-particularly-subtle dirty tricks.
545: 297: 1903:
is a big criteria. If this was noteable, then any Thomson comment by any of the federal 226 MPs would by rights be added to 226 articles. What precisely elevates Kelly's comment above other comments?
2549: 1600:
If public criticism of internation bodies, such as Kelly's criticism of the ICJ, is not allowed to be mentioned, then why has this been allowed on Knowledge for John Bolton's critisicms of the UN?
2354: 1310:
Secondly, as I noted above, the new version is better than what you originally added to the article, however I still do not think that it is neutral enough. Particularly where an article is a
528: 293: 55: 158: 689: 580: 2544: 670: 2594: 2559: 878: 223: 2494: 1380:, the man who Kelly defeated at the recent election, and a person who made some very controversial remarks along these lines in the media, do you not think that there are 2599: 387: 364: 326: 2499: 2539: 2489: 2402: 2398: 2384: 2204: 2200: 2186: 354: 2355:
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/somalia-to-edenmonaro-how-mike-kelly-fought-a-murderous-warlord-all-the-way-to-a-firing-squad/238656.aspx
2589: 373: 2484: 228: 2524: 211:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 2574: 2529: 830: 820: 90: 2043:
Chris Kenny, who is an ex Liberal-party staffer. I'd like to see more evidence that this is of wider significance before it would warrant inclusion. -
873: 726: 665: 576: 496: 285: 2604: 2564: 622: 203: 2514: 2164: 1078:
add much to the article." - this is farcical, given that ther MAINSTREAM MEDIA found these matter sufficiently worthy of mention. Peter Phelps
321: 280: 179: 2519: 330: 146: 96: 1698: 1649: 626: 2569: 2534: 1778: 742: 1919:
Just noting that my revision summary of "rv - a single MP's page is not the place for the 'standard of Australian politics'. it is not
2324: 2136: 1771:
and bob Carr having a go at him is not "disagreement between public figures" you have to be kidding! and the referances looked fine.
630: 35: 2380:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2370: 1443:"a person who made some very controversial remarks along these lines in the media" So I can be mentioned on a Knowledge page (see 621:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 140: 1346:
distorted (especially given the extensive use of Kelly's own words) and I will rewrite or withdraw. But I am not a mind-reader.
537: 1887: 796: 783: 717: 617: 571: 110: 41: 2340: 2360: 1552:
If extensive support for Israel is not allowed to be mentioned, then why is it so allowed on Michael Danby's Wiki biography?
136: 115: 31: 1642:
Dude, he's got nothing better to do with his time. Just let him mess about then when he gets bored we can change it back.
735: 85: 2445: 255: 186: 76: 1447:), including quotations, but Kelly and his statements cannot? Consistency of standards between articles, please? 2401:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2203:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2466: 1820: 1702: 1653: 152: 1782: 2436: 2332: 2165:
https://web.archive.org/20080707001448/http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22447046-29277,00.html
1018: 325:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 212: 120: 2328: 1623: 1605: 1572: 1557: 1499: 1452: 1414: 1351: 1285: 1230: 1203: 1103: 970: 863: 2420:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2408: 2265: 2242: 2222:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2210: 2168: 1691:
mentioned in this article some how. It would be a shame to see wikipedia help to astro turf Mike Kelly
261: 2331:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1601: 1553: 1448: 1410: 1347: 1281: 1226: 1199: 1037: 966: 1937: 1908: 1875: 1774: 1694: 1645: 1619: 222:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 1879: 909: 243: 2462: 1982: 1883: 1315: 172: 66: 2470: 2450: 2307: 2293: 2277: 2250: 2109: 2070: 2052: 2021: 1986: 1960: 1941: 1912: 1891: 1853: 1837: 1786: 1742: 1706: 1657: 1626: 1609: 1575: 1561: 1530: 1502: 1456: 1418: 1355: 1289: 1234: 1207: 1183: 1106: 1064: 1044: 1040:, as they were added rather recently, loaded with POV and didn't really add much to the article. 1030: 1010: 987: 974: 959: 1323: 1154: 1007: 984: 792: 226:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 81: 2405:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2371:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090520152631/http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/member.asp?id=HRI
2207:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
919: 2421: 2223: 1280:
I thought that I was supposed to remove this because SatuSuro told me to get it off this page.
2303: 2273: 2146: 2105: 1060: 1026: 62: 2289: 2238: 2066: 2017: 1849: 1738: 1615: 772: 609: 17: 2428: 2341:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080820172657/http://www.minister.defence.gov.au/kelly/bio.htm
2230: 2361:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070606205525/http://www.alp.org.au/people/nsw/kelly_mike.php
2154: 2058: 2048: 1956: 1933: 1904: 1833: 219: 1923:, and as your change away from the status quo is disputed, you must by wiki rules gain a 2374: 2268:
Can someone please check/add cite etc, the unreferenced latest edit on this BLP please?
1175:
subject is definitely warranted, an entire essay containing speculative sentences like "
2387:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2189:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1978: 1920: 1900: 1527: 1180: 1041: 1002: 2427:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2229:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
839: 679: 504: 2478: 2008: 1929: 1924: 1568: 1485: 1381: 1319: 1311: 1099: 2344: 2299: 2269: 2101: 1489: 1056: 1022: 2364: 2585:
Low-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
1021:
article a thorough going over? It's a pretty spectacular POV mess at the moment.
2394: 2285: 2261: 2196: 2062: 2013: 1845: 1734: 1158: 1095: 956: 756: 711: 520: 593: 565: 488: 2505:
Start-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
2393:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2195:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2044: 2004: 1974: 1952: 1829: 1444: 1377: 1146: 887: 762: 599: 2510:
Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
1165: 788: 2580:
C-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
2461:
be a matter for future friction, deserves some treatment. Other thoughts?
1149:
proposed version, moved "under the fold" to reduce clutter.|2= Colonel Dr
1494: 2151:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1177:
perhaps he will rely on his usual excuse: "I was only following orders".
850:
the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
1899:
It might be factual, but that is not the sole criteria for inclusion.
1844:
party line so his personal views on the bill are largely irrelevant).
900: 2169:
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22447046-29277,00.html
513:
Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
629:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 313: 274: 2159:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
655: 1161: 237: 218:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
195: 26: 1977:
has a POV interest in this subject. Hence, reverted. Rgds, --
2174:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
2057:
I agree with removing this text - it's a clear violation of
908: 886: 862: 838: 678: 654: 536: 519: 503: 487: 372: 2555:
Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
2335:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2135:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
2140: 1488:- amusingly, I'd had a picture in my head of the other 1376:
Thirdly, if you are indeed Dr Peter Phelps, advisor to
1258: 1973:
From looking at the edit record, it would appear that
171: 2375:
http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/member.asp?id=HRI
981:
Draft rewrite removed - it's in the history if needed
2550:
C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
385:
This article has been checked against the following
2397:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2199:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 470: 384: 2012:whether they are the party whom I support or not. 2345:http://www.minister.defence.gov.au/kelly/bio.htm 787:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 44:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2365:http://www.alp.org.au/people/nsw/kelly_mike.php 2383:This message was posted before February 2018. 2185:This message was posted before February 2018. 795:. If you would like to participate, visit the 185: 8: 2545:Low-importance biography (military) articles 2100:the disbelief of his fellow panel members". 2595:Low-importance Australian politics articles 2560:Politics and government work group articles 1141:How about this? Any POV or Synthesis here? 706: 560: 467: 381: 269: 2495:Start-Class biography (military) articles 2323:I have just modified 4 external links on 1168:Army lawyer turned federal politician. 2600:WikiProject Australian politics articles 319:This article is within the scope of the 708: 562: 271: 241: 2500:Military biography work group articles 2316:External links modified (January 2018) 690:the politics and government work group 339:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 329:. To use this banner, please see the 2540:C-Class biography (military) articles 2490:Start-Class military history articles 2007:have an POV on the subject, a bit of 342:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 2590:C-Class Australian politics articles 1409:referencing on the Gary Nairn page? 615:This article is within the scope of 2485:Biography articles of living people 260:It is of interest to the following 34:for discussing improvements to the 2525:Start-Class Post-Cold War articles 2325:Mike Kelly (Australian politician) 2137:Mike Kelly (Australian politician) 895:Need help improving this article? 779:Mike Kelly (Australian politician) 36:Mike Kelly (Australian politician) 25: 2575:Mid-importance Australia articles 2530:Post-Cold War task force articles 2327:. Please take a moment to review 2139:. Please take a moment to review 1864:This is factual and pertinent. 666:the military biography work group 927: 765: 755: 741: 734: 710: 602: 592: 564: 444: 433: 422: 411: 400: 312: 273: 242: 201:This article must adhere to the 56:Click here to start a new topic. 1616:our document on "Wikilawyering" 874:WikiProject Australian politics 825:This article has been rated as 805:Knowledge:WikiProject Australia 639:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 359:This article has been rated as 2605:WikiProject Australia articles 2565:WikiProject Biography articles 923:can be contacted via email to 808:Template:WikiProject Australia 642:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 2515:Start-Class Cold War articles 1867:Thompson Remarks Controversy 1860:Disputed Entry for discussion 935:for non-editorial assistance. 901:National Library of Australia 871:This article is supported by 847:This article is supported by 687:This article is supported by 663:This article is supported by 497:Military biography task force 204:biographies of living persons 53:Put new text under old text. 2520:Cold War task force articles 2451:11:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC) 2308:07:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC) 2294:06:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC) 2278:06:30, 3 December 2016 (UTC) 2251:18:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 1658:06:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC) 1312:biography of a living person 1145:{{hidden|1=Article text for 627:contribute to the discussion 322:Military history WikiProject 18:Talk:Mike Kelly (politician) 1854:08:16, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 1838:22:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 1151:Michael Joseph "Mike" Kelly 1036:I've reverted the edits by 920:Wikimedia Australia chapter 216:must be removed immediately 61:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2621: 2570:C-Class Australia articles 2535:C-Class biography articles 2414:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2320:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2216:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2157:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 2132:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1787:05:47, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 1743:07:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 1707:04:58, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 831:project's importance scale 405:Referencing and citation: 2471:06:34, 3 April 2020 (UTC) 1818:pensions was made public. 928: 916: 894: 870: 846: 824: 750: 686: 662: 587: 544: 527: 511: 495: 466: 358: 345:military history articles 307: 268: 91:Be welcoming to newcomers 2110:14:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 2071:10:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 2053:10:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 2022:10:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 1987:10:03, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 1961:05:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 1942:05:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 1913:04:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 1892:04:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC) 1627:15:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1610:11:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1576:15:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1562:10:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1531:11:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1503:14:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1457:11:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1419:11:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1356:11:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1290:11:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1235:10:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1208:10:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1184:09:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1107:08:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1065:08:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1045:08:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1031:08:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 1011:13:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 988:13:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 975:13:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC) 960:12:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 793:Australia-related topics 546:Post-Cold War task force 2128:External links modified 1620:"What about article x?" 1019:Mike Kelly (politician) 781:is within the scope of 581:Politics and Government 471:Associated task forces: 416:Coverage and accuracy: 1001:Discussion moved from 913: 891: 867: 843: 683: 659: 541: 524: 508: 492: 449:Supporting materials: 377: 250:This article is rated 86:avoid personal attacks 2456:Enhancements for 2020 2266:User:AustralianRupert 1017:Can someone give the 912: 890: 866: 842: 784:WikiProject Australia 682: 658: 618:WikiProject Biography 540: 523: 507: 491: 376: 111:Neutral point of view 2395:regular verification 2197:regular verification 2182:to let others know. 2143:. If necessary, add 1382:conflict of interest 1096:Knowledge's policies 116:No original research 2385:After February 2018 2187:After February 2018 2178:parameter below to 1484:do suggest reading 1316:Wilfrid Kent Hughes 531:(c. 1945 – c. 1989) 529:Cold War task force 438:Grammar and style: 391:for B-class status: 2439:InternetArchiveBot 2390:InternetArchiveBot 2192:InternetArchiveBot 1614:I suggest reading 1324:Thomas Playford IV 914: 892: 868: 844: 811:Australia articles 684: 660: 645:biography articles 542: 525: 509: 493: 378: 327:list of open tasks 256:content assessment 97:dispute resolution 58: 2415: 2249: 2217: 2003:In what way does 1895: 1878:comment added by 1777:comment added by 1697:comment added by 1648:comment added by 1384:questions raised? 1038:User:Peter phelps 1013: 947: 946: 943: 942: 939: 938: 705: 704: 701: 700: 559: 558: 555: 554: 551: 550: 462: 461: 418:criterion not met 407:criterion not met 363:on the project's 331:full instructions 236: 235: 194: 193: 77:Assume good faith 54: 16:(Redirected from 2612: 2449: 2440: 2413: 2412: 2391: 2245: 2244:Talk to my owner 2240: 2215: 2214: 2193: 2158: 2150: 1894: 1872: 1789: 1733:personal views. 1709: 1660: 1261:(at the bottom). 999: 934: 933:wikimedia.org.au 932: 931: 930: 813: 812: 809: 806: 803: 775: 773:Australia portal 770: 769: 768: 759: 752: 751: 746: 745: 744: 739: 738: 737: 732: 729: 723:Military history 714: 707: 647: 646: 643: 640: 637: 623:join the project 612: 610:Biography portal 607: 606: 605: 596: 589: 588: 583: 568: 561: 478: 468: 452: 448: 447: 441: 437: 436: 430: 426: 425: 419: 415: 414: 408: 404: 403: 382: 347: 346: 343: 340: 337: 336:Military history 316: 309: 308: 303: 300: 281:Military history 277: 270: 253: 247: 246: 238: 224:this noticeboard 196: 190: 189: 175: 106:Article policies 27: 21: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2475: 2474: 2458: 2443: 2438: 2406: 2399:have permission 2389: 2333:this simple FaQ 2318: 2258: 2248: 2243: 2208: 2201:have permission 2191: 2152: 2144: 2130: 1873: 1862: 1808: 1772: 1692: 1643: 1164:), is a former 996: 952: 926: 924: 897:Ask a Librarian 810: 807: 804: 801: 800: 771: 766: 764: 740: 733: 730: 720: 644: 641: 638: 635: 634: 608: 603: 601: 574: 476: 450: 445: 439: 434: 428: 423: 417: 412: 406: 401: 344: 341: 338: 335: 334: 301: 283: 254:on Knowledge's 251: 132: 127: 126: 125: 102: 72: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2618: 2616: 2608: 2607: 2602: 2597: 2592: 2587: 2582: 2577: 2572: 2567: 2562: 2557: 2552: 2547: 2542: 2537: 2532: 2527: 2522: 2517: 2512: 2507: 2502: 2497: 2492: 2487: 2477: 2476: 2463:Erasmus Sydney 2457: 2454: 2433: 2432: 2425: 2378: 2377: 2369:Added archive 2367: 2359:Added archive 2357: 2349:Added archive 2347: 2339:Added archive 2317: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2257: 2254: 2241: 2235: 2234: 2227: 2172: 2171: 2163:Added archive 2129: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1945: 1944: 1916: 1915: 1861: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1810:I've removed: 1807: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1699:111.118.142.21 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1650:150.203.223.39 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1246: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1049: 1048: 1015: 1014: 995: 994:POV Discussion 992: 991: 990: 951: 948: 945: 944: 941: 940: 937: 936: 915: 905: 904: 893: 883: 882: 879:Low-importance 869: 859: 858: 855:Low-importance 845: 835: 834: 827:Mid-importance 823: 817: 816: 814: 777: 776: 760: 748: 747: 731:Mid‑importance 715: 703: 702: 699: 698: 695:Low-importance 685: 675: 674: 671:Low-importance 661: 651: 650: 648: 614: 613: 597: 585: 584: 569: 557: 556: 553: 552: 549: 548: 543: 533: 532: 526: 516: 515: 510: 500: 499: 494: 484: 483: 481: 479: 473: 472: 464: 463: 460: 459: 457: 455: 454: 453: 442: 431: 420: 409: 395: 394: 392: 379: 369: 368: 357: 351: 350: 348: 317: 305: 304: 278: 266: 265: 259: 248: 234: 233: 229:this help page 213:poorly sourced 199: 192: 191: 129: 128: 124: 123: 118: 113: 104: 103: 101: 100: 93: 88: 79: 73: 71: 70: 59: 50: 49: 46: 45: 39: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2617: 2606: 2603: 2601: 2598: 2596: 2593: 2591: 2588: 2586: 2583: 2581: 2578: 2576: 2573: 2571: 2568: 2566: 2563: 2561: 2558: 2556: 2553: 2551: 2548: 2546: 2543: 2541: 2538: 2536: 2533: 2531: 2528: 2526: 2523: 2521: 2518: 2516: 2513: 2511: 2508: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2498: 2496: 2493: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2483: 2482: 2480: 2473: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2455: 2453: 2452: 2447: 2442: 2441: 2430: 2426: 2423: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2410: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2386: 2381: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2321: 2315: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2256:Is this okay? 2255: 2253: 2252: 2246: 2239: 2232: 2228: 2225: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2212: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2188: 2183: 2181: 2177: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2156: 2148: 2142: 2138: 2133: 2127: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2010: 2006: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1917: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1868: 1865: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1821: 1819: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1805: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1779:203.123.84.67 1776: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1628: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1532: 1529: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1504: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1491: 1487: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1407: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1325: 1321: 1320:Andrew Fisher 1317: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1260: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1185: 1182: 1178: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1167: 1163: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1140: 1139: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1012: 1009: 1005: 1004: 998: 997: 993: 989: 986: 982: 979: 978: 977: 976: 972: 968: 962: 961: 958: 949: 922: 921: 911: 907: 906: 902: 898: 889: 885: 884: 880: 877:(assessed as 876: 875: 865: 861: 860: 856: 853:(assessed as 852: 851: 841: 837: 836: 832: 828: 822: 819: 818: 815: 798: 794: 790: 786: 785: 780: 774: 763: 761: 758: 754: 753: 749: 728: 724: 719: 716: 713: 709: 696: 693:(assessed as 692: 691: 681: 677: 676: 672: 669:(assessed as 668: 667: 657: 653: 652: 649: 632: 631:documentation 628: 624: 620: 619: 611: 600: 598: 595: 591: 590: 586: 582: 578: 573: 570: 567: 563: 547: 539: 535: 534: 530: 522: 518: 517: 514: 506: 502: 501: 498: 490: 486: 485: 482: 480: 475: 474: 469: 465: 458: 456: 451:criterion met 443: 440:criterion met 432: 429:criterion met 421: 410: 399: 398: 397: 396: 393: 390: 389: 383: 380: 375: 371: 370: 366: 365:quality scale 362: 356: 353: 352: 349: 332: 328: 324: 323: 318: 315: 311: 310: 306: 299: 298:Post-Cold War 295: 291: 290:South Pacific 287: 282: 279: 276: 272: 267: 263: 257: 249: 245: 240: 239: 231: 230: 225: 221: 217: 214: 210: 206: 205: 200: 198: 197: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:Find sources: 131: 130: 122: 121:Verifiability 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 108: 107: 98: 94: 92: 89: 87: 83: 80: 78: 75: 74: 68: 64: 63:Learn to edit 60: 57: 52: 51: 48: 47: 43: 37: 33: 29: 28: 19: 2459: 2437: 2434: 2409:source check 2388: 2382: 2379: 2322: 2319: 2298:Thanks Nick 2259: 2236: 2211:source check 2190: 2184: 2179: 2175: 2173: 2134: 2131: 1874:— Preceding 1869: 1866: 1863: 1826: 1816: 1809: 1641: 1624:Orderinchaos 1602:Peter phelps 1573:Orderinchaos 1554:Peter phelps 1500:Orderinchaos 1493: 1490:Peter Phelps 1449:Peter phelps 1411:Peter phelps 1405: 1348:Peter phelps 1282:Peter phelps 1245: 1227:Peter phelps 1200:Peter phelps 1176: 1150: 1144: 1104:Orderinchaos 1016: 1000: 980: 967:Peter phelps 963: 953: 917: 896: 872: 848: 826: 797:project page 782: 778: 688: 664: 616: 386: 360: 320: 262:WikiProjects 227: 215: 208: 202: 182: 176: 168: 161: 155: 149: 143: 133: 105: 30:This is the 2262:User:Nick-D 1773:—Preceding 1693:—Preceding 1644:—Preceding 1618:, and also 1159:23 February 427:Structure: 361:Start-class 302:Start‑class 159:free images 42:not a forum 2479:Categories 2446:Report bug 2009:good faith 1445:Gary Nairn 1378:Gary Nairn 1166:Australian 1147:Mike Kelly 2429:this tool 2422:this tool 2231:this tool 2224:this tool 1979:Trident13 1934:Timeshift 1905:Timeshift 1880:LowLarynx 1528:Lankiveil 1259:this diff 1181:Lankiveil 1042:Lankiveil 802:Australia 789:Australia 718:Australia 636:Biography 572:Biography 286:Biography 220:libellous 99:if needed 82:Be polite 32:talk page 2435:Cheers.— 2237:Cheers.— 2147:cbignore 2059:WP:UNDUE 1888:contribs 1876:unsigned 1775:unsigned 1695:unsigned 1646:unsigned 1495:Stingers 1008:Moondyne 985:Moondyne 950:Untitled 727:Politics 577:Military 388:criteria 294:Cold War 67:get help 40:This is 38:article. 2329:my edit 2300:JennyOz 2270:JennyOz 2247::Online 2176:checked 2141:my edit 2102:Frickeg 1921:WP:NOTE 1901:WP:NOTE 1806:Bayonet 1057:Rebecca 1023:Rebecca 1003:WP:AWNB 899:at the 829:on the 252:C-class 165:WP refs 153:scholar 2286:Nick-D 2155:nobots 2063:Nick-D 2014:Bidgee 1930:WP:3RR 1925:WP:CON 1846:Nick-D 1735:Nick-D 1569:WP:BLP 1492:(a la 1486:WP:COI 1157:(born 1100:WP:SYN 957:Alec.N 258:scale. 137:Google 2045:Bilby 2005:Bilby 1975:Bilby 1953:Bilby 1830:Bilby 1406:guess 355:Start 180:JSTOR 141:books 95:Seek 2467:talk 2304:talk 2290:talk 2274:talk 2180:true 2106:talk 2067:talk 2049:talk 2018:talk 1983:talk 1957:talk 1938:talk 1909:talk 1884:talk 1850:talk 1834:talk 1783:talk 1739:talk 1703:talk 1654:talk 1606:talk 1558:talk 1453:talk 1415:talk 1352:talk 1286:talk 1231:talk 1204:talk 1162:1960 1061:talk 1027:talk 971:talk 925:help 918:The 791:and 625:and 173:FENS 147:news 84:and 2403:RfC 2373:to 2363:to 2353:to 2343:to 2260:Hi 2205:RfC 2167:to 1322:or 821:Mid 209:BLP 187:TWL 2481:: 2469:) 2416:. 2411:}} 2407:{{ 2306:) 2292:) 2276:) 2264:, 2218:. 2213:}} 2209:{{ 2153:{{ 2149:}} 2145:{{ 2108:) 2069:) 2061:. 2051:) 2020:) 1985:) 1959:) 1940:) 1932:. 1911:) 1890:) 1886:• 1852:) 1836:) 1785:) 1741:) 1705:) 1656:) 1622:. 1608:) 1560:) 1455:) 1417:) 1354:) 1318:, 1288:) 1233:) 1206:) 1155:AM 1153:, 1102:. 1063:) 1029:) 1006:. 983:. 973:) 881:). 857:). 725:/ 721:: 697:). 673:). 579:/ 575:: 477:/ 296:/ 292:/ 288:/ 284:: 167:) 65:; 2465:( 2448:) 2444:( 2431:. 2424:. 2302:( 2288:( 2272:( 2233:. 2226:. 2104:( 2065:( 2047:( 2016:( 1981:( 1955:( 1936:( 1907:( 1882:( 1848:( 1832:( 1781:( 1737:( 1701:( 1652:( 1604:( 1556:( 1533:. 1451:( 1413:( 1350:( 1326:. 1284:( 1229:( 1202:( 1186:. 1059:( 1047:. 1025:( 969:( 903:. 833:. 799:. 633:. 367:. 333:. 264:: 232:. 207:( 183:· 177:· 169:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 139:( 69:. 20:)

Index

Talk:Mike Kelly (politician)
talk page
Mike Kelly (Australian politician)
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
biographies of living persons
poorly sourced
libellous
this noticeboard
this help page

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑