Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Musical note/Archive 1

Source 📝

31: 1074:
countries generally use either of these systems, with the "H" variant dominant mainly in Germany (and if you say so, perhaps Finland). The southern European countries tend to use the do-re-mi system. English speaking countries use the sharp/flat notation. The sentence about Heses was imcompresensibly formulated and not essential, so I removed it. To get more references do a Google search like "bes fis". −
1224: 257:
that is normally called "C." After all, C is the most basic scale of tonal music, having no sharps or flats. I asked a theory professor about this, and he related the assignment of specific pitches to specific letters to an ancient Greek system of notation, but I have forgotten what he said. I would appreciate it very much if someone would address this issue. --G DeBenedetti
796:
italics. I know the Capital Letters and lower case letters are significant and the apostophes somehow modify the octave, but I can not find definitions anywhere. Maybe if I insert symbols... I think A“ is in the bass clef and g”” is above the treble, but I do not know specifics. Knowledge (XXG) has everything else. Please add this soon. --
894:
Well, actually, I think this explanation is missing. I just searched(!) for this very question and I am glad to have found at least a small piece of discussion about it here. So, when and why (and by whom) was it decided to start from C (Do) and not from A (La)? Would be nice if somebody knowledgable
256:
I have not found a discussion in Knowledge (XXG) about the reason for the letter "A" representing the pitch at 440 Hz (and its octaves). I tell my music theory classes that it seems arbitrary. If I were to invent the system of assigning letters to pitches, I would assign the letter "A" to the pitch
1154:
Didn't discover this until now; I thought we were discussing on your talk page. I was never against adding info that has sources, and i added the bes system as soon as I found a reliable source. The original situation was however complete nonsense because it presented the mixture between the English
1000:
I doubt this system is only used in Italian, Greek, French and Russian. In fact, I know for a fact that it's used in more than just those languages/countries as my own language/country uses them. The Germanic notation (ABCDEFG, with H sometimes) is used only by Germanic-influenced countries, I think
904:
That's only for fixed Do, which isn't used as much as moveable Do. In Moveable Do, Do is represented by the first note in the Major Key as indicated by the key signature. For example, C would represent Do in the Keys of C major and A minor. In the key of B flat Major, Do would be B flat, and so on.
752:
The table under Note Names seems to have some problems. AFAIK, the entries in the rows named "Flat (text)" and "Sharp (text)" are excusive to German, and should be included in the German row. The English names are simply "F sharp" or "B flat", and could just be included in the row of English note
1833:
I think that note is too generic to deserve an article of it's own and taking precedence over any specific type, I think the main page for "note" should be the disambiguation page given it's wide variety of meanings, and the current "note" which refers to "musical note" be renamed to reflect that.
1053:
This whole section is nonsense. Instead of explaining the system of -is and -es suffixes actually used in many countries, which is based on B natural being called H, this section presents a hypothetical system that is used nowhere. Worse still, it confuses users by "teaching" them incorrect things
845:
music can be composed of notes at any arbitrary frequency. Since the physical causes of music are vibrations of mechanical systems, they are often measured in hertz (Hz), with 1 Hz = 1 complete vibration per second. For historical and other reasons especially in Western music, only twelve notes of
821:
This page has systematic errors about MIDI octave numbering, and those errors have led to incorrect frequency values in the table at the end of the "Note name" section. In fact, as the page on MIDI correctly states, MIDI pitch number 0 is C(-1). Thus, the MIDI gamut runs from C(-1) to G9, rather
795:
Would someone please add the note names shown in CAPS and lower case letters, with and without apostrophes, to this article? Perhaps under History of... I tried to type examples like a lower case g with 3 apostrophes, but that is apparently code for text formating, because half the preview was in
488:
page, which could use some of the info scattered in this talk page and elsewhere. I want to start on this pretty soon, but we shgould really generate some ideas about what exactly belongs in the note article. Specifically, should sharps and flats be discussed here? If not, where should they go? --
2239:
Well, I removed the brackets like you said and I got 71.9999956789 as the result. I guess I will need to round up, right? Correction, when I added more precision to the note frequency I got an even 72.0. Here is the note frequency for C5: 523.251130601. The extra precision must have corrected the
1181:
This is completely wrong. The German system is used in all Scandinavian countries plus all the other European countries that you deleted. Basically all European countries except the Netherlands and countries whose main language is not English or a Romance language use the German system, as it now
279:
Part of the problem lies in that the terminology of the subject itself ambiguous. A note is a piece of sound, eg the C sharp key on my piano plays a note. On the page is printed a note, which is C sharp. These two uses of the word to me are different in some way which I can't yet qualify. A rough
126:
Results: F, C, B, E, C, G. The tiny superscript codes run together, so for double-sharps, put a space between the two pound-signs ("# #"). In general, the simple "# / b" characters are close enough, such as F# or Bb, especially considering the tedious coding of superscript expressions. However,
1073:
The system using B and Bes is not hypothetical. It is used in several countries, including some German editions. There are two systems using the "is" and "(e)s" postfixes. A regular system with B and Bes and a variant using H and B instead. So I had to revert the article. The northern European
782:
I notice there is no page for "staff position" and no entry (including this one) refers significantly to the lines and spaces of the staff as determinants of the name of the note. Notes can't be placed just anywhere on the staff but must be on a line or space (or ledger line). Is this a policy
2205:
What I am doing is first i add 69 to 12. Next, I multiplied the value I got from the addition to the value of the log of C5Freq / 440.0 using a base of 2. This comes out to 20.2499708327. However, the answer should be 72. Is the formula wrong or am I doing something wrong in the calculations?
972:
Almost every major dictionary gives two meanings for "note" -- one the notation itself, the other the sound itself. Furthermore, this second meaning is very well established in ordinary musical discourse. People speak of jazz musicians playing "notes" all the time. When Joseph II said that
945:
In the case of the North Indian Musical system I understand that Sa, Re, Ga etc are not associated with any specific frequency, as suggested in the table: eg Sa may be 'above' or "below' C4 by upto a tone at. least. The relative positions remain the same.
1191:
Please add the sharps and flats in the "southern" European system. Maybe French + Italian is enough. If someone wants to add Spanish and Portuguese they can, but it'll look pretty ridiculous because the designations for flats and sharps are all so similar in the Romance languages.
1903:. I don't see any evidence that other meanings than music being linked to this title is a problem. I hope that if this proposal succeeds that some of the proposers volunteer to help repair all the links to disambiguation that result from moving music off of the primary topic. 1465:
I just went through note pages on other languages and found nice table in italian version, which seems correct. I found on other pages, what languages uses what: Italian System (some with Ut instead of Do): Italians, Spains, Greeks, Romanians, Bulgarians, Ukraine, Belarus,
656:
Maybe this would be a little overkill, but how about a group of articles, one for each musical note? (E.G. an article about A, an article about B flat, etc.) The articles would contain facts about each note, similar to the group of articles about numbers. For example:
543:
The notation described as "Northern European, and Scandinavian before 1990s" is in fact in use in Hungary (likely german, austrian influence). Not sure about other countries, it was used in Germany sure and I think it is still being used this way but can't testify
591:
There's something wrong, here, but I'm not sure what. Which is B and which is H is more complicated than that, but I've never heard what the correct rule is. See, though, for example, Brahms' B-Flat Piano Concerto: In German, the key is given as "H-dur."
1624:
The article seems to suggest that A = 440Hz and equal temperament (twelfth-root of 2 relationship) are the only answers, which they are not. I would refer to these as "modern conventions" since historically other tunings and temperaments have been used.
82:
Over the past 2 years, the unprintable sharp/flat unicodes have been reverted in articles to use simple # / b; however, superscripted codes seem more accurate and universal. For more precise coding, that shows on most PC screens, use superscripts:
926:
If you are asking why the natural major scale begins with C instead of A, the answer is in the article but it's not explicit. When Boethius assigned letter names, he began with the first pitch of the Greek two-octave system. That system does
822:
than from C0 to G10. In the table at the end of the "Note name" section, the last two columns agree with each other, but both of those columns should be moved up one line in order to agree with the preceding columns. --Lyle Ramshaw
1399:, because immediately right of that is C9-G9, and the MIDI note number does not go to 131. This is not vandalism, unless somebody before this changed B9 to G9 and the highest MIDI note from 131 to 127. I doubt this is the case. -- 2294:
The "Written notes" section has an image that makes no sense. It has a C (which means 4/4) time signature but the time signature would have to be 60/4 in order to follow the "don't fill up a measure with too many notes" rule.
2176:
Now, I want to calculate the MIDI note number of C5 which is 72. However, when I do the calculations the answer comes out to 20! I am doing the calculations in a python 2.76 session. Here is the following commands I used:
1231:
I removed a picture showing the accidentals, which had them confusingly ordered. Would be a good picture if reordered from left to right (perhaps still wavy on two lines): double flat, flat, natural, sharp, double sharp.
496:
This seems a logical place for sharps and flats. A "note" notates pitch and duration, and a flat or sharp is part of the indication of pitch. Whether it's noted in the key signature or nearby is simply "accidental". --
1168:
I'll have to do some research on the German link you found. No German reference work and no German school uses bes. I presume this is an idiosyncrasy perhaps caused by the author being more of a computer expert than a
743:
I have created a table collecting most namings. I moved in the frequencies (one octave) as well. It would be nice to add a row with small pictures of each note on a staff. I do not have the tools. Who volunteers?
1514:
Everything. It only has one citation, and that one is attached to a statement that is not very well connected to what the source actually says. A source the "two primary meanings" would be nice, if it exists.
711:
The phrase "note name" is used in two senses in this article: the letter name and the duration. I propose that the the term "note value" is the standard term encompassing quarter notes, eighth notes, and so on.
2173: 273:
accidental signs change pitch, but accidental notes are those which have been modified by sings to be out of the scale of a piece. This definition becomes shaky in pieces that don't use the diatonic scale.
1425:
This article is about notes, not MIDI. The musical definition is leading. I have added the shortfall of MIDI as a remark. Shortening the octave is also not consistent with denoting A in the last column.
1022:
Japanese also use this system. i-ro-ha stuff are very dated counting system. not specific to music. my wife (japanese) had never heard about using i-ro-ha for notes. you can learn more about it there.
2254:
You should round to nearest (not up). Using finite precision arithmetic you will almost never get exact values. And by the way the MIDI scale for microtuning can also handle the fractional part. −
157:
looks even better, since "#" and the true flat symbol are usually slanted. Consecutive italics have wider spacing as well, so the intervening space is not needed. This leads to a revised advice:
932: 731:
Looking at JFQ's comment above, how about to include a table that would contain a comparison of the note names across different languages? I will be happy to collect all contributions on my
2268:
Ah good to know. Going back to the original problem, i only added the brackets because the program will do calculations in parentheses or brackets first. Thank you for all of your help. -
681:
I dunno... it doesn't seem to me that there would be enough to write about each note to justify giving each one its own article. Such facts could probably be presented in a list here at
973:
Mozart's music contained "too many notes" he was referring to the way the music sounded, not the way it was written. I'm therefore adding this second definition to the article.
753:
names. Also, the "French/Italian/Spanish/Portuguese" row should include names for the sharp and flat notes. I don't know the specifics for each language, but they likely follow
1855:
of note would be a musical note. Outside of an obvious musical context I would normally expect the addition of musical in front of note as a method of disambiguation. I would
1468:
Skandinavian system, which is actualy the German system: Germans, Austrians, countries formerly pats of Austria-Hungarian Empire (Czech Republic, Slovakia, Croatia, Hungaria)
413:
this usage of sharp and flat nomenclature is really secondary and relates only to the verbal usage of speaking about notes. I replaced it with the common usage in notation.
850:
This seems just plain wrong. There may be only 12 designated pitch classes, but there are clearly more than twelve labeled frequencies. The beginning of the article says:
600:
Nice work, but it's very Western-centric. There are 24 note octaves and so-on. Indian, Arabic, etc. Anyone with an in-depth knowledge of non-Western music out there? --
2389: 2385: 2371: 1696: 1001:
most of the world uses Guido D'Arezzo's system. Could anyone back this up please? I'm very surprised by how little mention of this system this article makes. Thanks.
875:
Seriously, the answer is that thinking of "Do" as the beginning of note-naming, or the "first" note in a scale, is a very recent invention, whereas the association of
1027:
but at school, japanese use Do Re Mi Fa So La Si small difference, So is spelled without the l and Si is Shi, since they dont have final L sound and Si sound.
1179:
The northern European countries generally use either of these systems, with the "H" variant dominant mainly in Germany (and if you say so, perhaps Finland).
1209:
Removing links intended to promote websites or products is not arbitrary, but in keeping with Knowledge (XXG) policy. Please see WP:LINKS for details.
1132:
Usage seems to focus on the Netherlands and Belgium, but some German refs were found as well. I have made the wording in the article more balanced. −
576:
Done. And I forgot to put a source note in -- it's the Oxford Companion to Music, 10th ed, 1970. (which I bought for a quid in a library sale!) --
1124: 874:
article doesn't explain why "tree" is represented in French by "arbre" rather than "très", which would be the logical choice. </smartaleck: -->
533:
Does anybody know why this is, by the way? I looked in Grove the other day to find out, but it didn't explain it. I'm losing sleep over it. --
1632: 1372: 1008: 2313:, I have removed the time signature (I also switched to lilypond notation, as I don't know ABC, I am not a musician). Is it better now? -- 207: 1680:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
2065: 1480: 1412: 1258: 1034: 953: 879:
syllables with note names is much more ancient. I don't think it's necessary to explain this misunderstanding in the article, however. —
292:
Specifically: the event of a sound being played in a piece of music, or the symbol in printed music representing the sound to be played.
2111: 936: 2367:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1951: 912: 854:
a note is either a unit of fixed pitch that has been given a name, or the graphic representation of that pitch in a notation system
139:). The more precise superscripted forms support music elitists as well as the vast general public on an amazing variety of PCs or 841:
As someone who knows almost nothing about music, one sentence in the "note frequency" section seems problematic to me. It says:
616:
Probably not on platforms where Unicode is not supported; there should be something like alt text for Unicode characters.....
232:
has been created to address the sharps/flats issue. I would suggest it be used instead. For example: {{music|sharp}} produces
715:
Speaking of which, the table of note values could be expanded with small graphics of each one. I'd be happy to do that. --
2432: 2083: 1671: 561:
My Oxford Companion has plenty on this, but it'll take me a while to write up ... I'll try & work on it tonight -
66: 866:
The article gracefully fails to explain why is Do represented by C and not by A, which would be the logical choice.
2004: 1801: 1763: 1647:
The article already qualifies its statements with the phrase "now-standard tuning pitch for most Western music". --
401:
A lot of this stuff is info that belongs on the Scale and Notation pages and is not relevant to an article on notes
38: 1308: 2388:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1852: 1142:
I'm glad you now recognise the existence of the system using Bes. That is no reason to kick it from the table. −
1880:
No indication that a musical note is the obvious primary topic. My first association with the word is actually
1636: 1450: 1012: 732: 2357: 2093: 1681: 1376: 1484: 1038: 2423: 2349: 2069: 1405: 1262: 957: 1628: 1476: 1368: 1254: 1030: 1004: 949: 916: 908: 319:
Tarquin's bold moves on the tuning page inspired me to tackle this article. Here's what I deleted and why:
2345: 1607: 1574: 1293: 127:
because Wiki articles feed other sources, worldwide, avoid unicodes for sharp/flat or use words (such as:
1446:
Shouldn't there be something in the lead about the usage of the word "tone" (US) to mean "note" (UK)? --
2407:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2395: 2300: 2036: 1998: 1955: 1935: 1921: 1858: 1839: 1795: 1785: 1757: 1753: 931:
begin with a major scale. Its major scale happens to start on the third pitch, which Boethius called C.
2348:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1950:
topic to find at "note", as this isn't the Music Encyclopedia. Replace with the disambiguation page --
1947: 1094: 797: 624: 462: 1340: 2259: 2226: 2045: 2025: 1984: 1447: 1431: 1237: 884: 736: 697: 217: 1365:
Why you guys put math and science stuff all over the article? Makes it fairly confusing to read.
593: 548: 1885: 1593: 1555: 1538: 1520: 1504: 1400: 1155:
and German system found only in NL (and not normally or perhaps even only very rarely in BE, see
2392:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1928:. This is a word with lots of possible meanings, and the musical note is not the primary topic. 974: 758: 2408: 1794:
Sorry about that. The template meant to indicate a target page was undecided upon at the time.
136: 1908: 1881: 1868: 1815: 1725: 1706: 1652: 1603: 1570: 1282: 826:
You are partially right. a′= A4 = 440 Hz = MIDI note 69. I have adjusted the octave numbers. −
552: 498: 458:
Again this is all key/scale/notation stuff that is duplicated (over and over again) elsewhere.
419:
A given piece of music will define at it's beginning The set of accidentals used defines the
391: 47: 17: 1693:. The second part, moving the disambig, will require admin assistance, which I will request. 1326: 858:
There are more than 12 named fixed pitch units, and more than 12 graphic representations....
2310: 2296: 2273: 2245: 2211: 1930: 1835: 1781: 1335: 1100: 961: 940: 920: 899: 888: 484:
articles. The stuff about score and staff really belongs somewhere else. There is already a
332:
away from a note of the scale. It also has a name and a symbol in the notation of the music.
2415: 1112: 1303:, although getting to either requires scrolling to the end of the article and showing the 871: 696:
I rather like that idea; we could also include lists of compositions in respective key. --
442: 438: 1499:
Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification?
2374:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2320: 2255: 2222: 2040: 2020: 1980: 1427: 1348: 1233: 1143: 1133: 1118: 1075: 880: 827: 807: 784: 745: 716: 617: 585: 570: 534: 239: 229: 213: 188: 2414:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2381: 1088: 522:
I think you pretty much said what needs to be said ;-) B flat is written B, B is H --
1589: 1551: 1534: 1516: 1500: 1277:
has more of this kind of information. Maybe we could add a diagram to this article.--
724: 490: 420: 325: 1106: 2341: 2061: 1904: 1864: 1811: 1741: 1721: 1702: 1648: 1299: 1278: 1156: 896: 686: 640: 609: 601: 577: 562: 523: 469: 312: 243: 144: 2437: 2326: 2304: 2277: 2263: 2249: 2230: 2215: 2073: 2050: 2030: 2011: 1988: 1959: 1938: 1912: 1888: 1872: 1843: 1819: 1805: 1789: 1767: 1729: 1710: 1656: 1640: 1611: 1597: 1578: 1559: 1542: 1524: 1508: 1488: 1455: 1435: 1419: 1380: 1352: 1286: 1266: 1241: 1213: 1196: 1146: 1136: 1078: 1067: 1058: 1042: 1016: 977: 830: 810: 800: 771: 761: 643: 556: 336:
I felt this was unecessarily complex and didn't really add any useful information.
246: 221: 191: 147: 2269: 2241: 2207: 1749: 1223: 1210: 1159:) with the combination of bes and the is/es suffixes as the normal is/es system. 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2380:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2092:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1274: 1193: 1064: 1055: 768: 632:
IE still doesn't show it :O (lack of fonts?) Firefox shows it very well :) :)
1810:
I've updated the template parameter to be in sync with the current proposal.
1054:
about what they assume to be the system in use in Germany and Scandinavia. --
2314: 1716:
Update: The full move has now been done, and I have also moved all links to
1585: 1344: 515: 473: 2358:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081219095621/http://www.adamsatoms.com/notes/
1851:: very sensible proposal. As per nominator it does not seem clear that the 441:, who had taken them from the first syllabs of the first seven verses of a 1588:
links to lower case, I assume "double miniscule" means double lower case.
2221:
Why don't you leave out the brackets around (69 + 12) as in the formula?−
1745: 876: 754: 485: 128: 514:. This deserves a mention, by someone knowledgable of the subject. -- 153:
As has been discussed and more or less agreed before, using an italic
1227:
A picture and simple description of the basic music accidentals image
452:
C Do D Re E Mi F Fa G Sol A La B Si
329: 289:
Musically: a pitch which has a name assigned to it. (eg C sharp; mi )
132: 2019:. Nice proposed title, too. We avoid parentheses whenever possible. 767:
Do sostenido for sharp, e.g., and Si bemol for bemol. In Spanish. --
2361: 1776:. No one would expect an article about musical notes to be titled 1222: 477: 2168:{\displaystyle p=69+12\times \log _{2}{f \over 440\,{\text{Hz}}}} 1925: 1737: 1717: 682: 481: 270:"rung" is ambigious. notes are placed across lines or in spaces. 140: 429:
In Italian notation the notes of scales are given in terms of
25: 2107:
I am using the MIDI note number calculation formula which is:
307:
I have the funny feeling I wrote the above, a long time ago.
1777: 623:
Neither characters show on Windows 5.1 XP Professional, IE6
2240:
results to an even number. Thanks sooo much for the help! -
2352:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1322:, ISTM that getting to related articles should be easier. 1897: 1388: 2114: 2082:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1975:, so if you're going to move this article the title 1251:What are connected notes like this one (♫) called? 1049:
Another style of notation, rarely used in English...
1024: 2384:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1684:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2167: 2096:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1720:so they don't point to a disambig page. Thanks  — 261:This needs a re-write. The picture is great, but: 2035:Oh, this is a malformed move request, I daresay-- 1473:The list is not complete, but you can continue. 437:. These names follow the original names given by 324:A note in a piece of music either belongs to the 608:♯ and ♭ -- will these show on all platforms? -- 468:This article really needs to be integrated with 806:I had a first go at this. Please have a look. − 2370:This message was posted before February 2018. 1602:The examples you added make it clear, thanks. 506:In continental Europe (or parts thereof), the 267:the notes A,B,C... are not seperated by tones. 1329:so that it has more related links: "The term 636: 8: 1744:– No primary meaning. Note usually may mean 1333:has two primary meanings: 1) a sign used in 1470:English system - Lithuanians, English, USA 895:could include this in the article. Thanks! 390:The tone is almost twice a semitone and in 286:Generally: a single sound of constant pitch 2340:I have just modified one external link on 2194:C5 = (69 + 12) * log( (C5Freq / 440.0), 2) 1670:The following is a closed discussion of a 1085:Here are some references showing the Bes: 1028: 2157: 2146: 2137: 2113: 1569:What are "double minuscules", precisely? 1325:One possibility would be to rephrase the 2333:External links modified (February 2018) 2155: 208:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of style (music) 1857:additionally recommend that the page ' 664:is the standard tuning pitch (440 Hz). 203:(1) Double sharps don't look like that 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1967:There used to be many articles named 933:2602:306:CC83:FE0:40BA:2D31:9BFD:3424 670:is one of the common trumpet pitches. 328:of the music or is a whole number of 7: 1971:but they've gradually been moved to 1689:The result of the move request was: 445:. "Do" replaced the originary "ut". 2103:Incorrect MIDI note number formula? 1796:<<< SOME GADGET GEEK : --> 1758:<<< SOME GADGET GEEK : --> 1395:The change from b'''''' to g'''''' 569:Excellent! I look forward to it. -- 1946:clearly not musical notes, a very 1863:if this if this proposal passes. 1318:Since this is the main article on 676:is the most common car horn pitch. 24: 2344:. Please take a moment to review 1291:The question is also answered in 996:Do - Re - Mi - Fa - Sol - La - Si 431:Do - Re - Mi - Fa - Sol - La - Si 2362:http://www.adamsatoms.com/notes/ 1339:…" Another would be to add more 1273:They are called "beamed notes." 407:after the letter (e.g. C# or F#) 29: 2064:is better, but definitely move 206:(2) this discussion belongs at 115:Double-flats, use "<sup: --> 108:Double-sharp, use "<sup: --> 1017:23:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 889:03:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 476:, etc., and probably also the 1: 2327:15:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC) 1657:05:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 1641:15:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 1560:05:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 1489:03:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1353:18:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 1287:23:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 1267:14:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 1025:http://en.wikipedia.org/Iroha 900:23:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC) 762:18:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 739:21:57, August 26, 2005 (UTC) 652:Individual articles for notes 2438:08:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC) 2305:16:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC) 1663:Requested move 17 March 2015 1456:01:16, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 1381:04:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC) 1214:05:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 1197:22:14, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 1182:finally says in the article. 1147:11:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 1137:08:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 1079:20:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 1068:21:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 1059:21:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 1043:22:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 700:21:33, August 26, 2005 (UTC) 394:is exactly twice a semitone. 2290:The image needs to be fixed 1979:would be more consistent. — 1612:19:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 1598:02:45, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 1579:11:47, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 1543:02:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 962:12:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC) 846:fixed frequencies are used. 584:Marvellous. Thanks, tarq -- 557:11:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 2453: 2401:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2337:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2278:20:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC) 2264:15:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC) 2250:13:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC) 2231:09:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC) 2216:17:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC) 2074:20:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 2051:22:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 2031:03:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 2012:23:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC) 1989:15:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC) 1960:04:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC) 1939:03:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC) 1913:01:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC) 1889:23:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 1873:20:09, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 1844:00:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC) 1820:01:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC) 1806:16:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 1790:16:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 1768:15:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 1730:23:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1711:09:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 811:11:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 801:22:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 772:19:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 748:12:41:35, 2005-08-28 (UTC) 184:Results: F, C, B, E, C, G. 1525:05:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 1509:20:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 1436:06:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 1420:03:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 787:04:46, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) 719:04:46, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) 580:19:56 Mar 16, 2003 (UTC) 565:19:35 Mar 16, 2003 (UTC) 518:19:26 Mar 16, 2003 (UTC) 435:C - D - E - F - G - A - B 247:20:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 2089:Please do not modify it. 1677:Please do not modify it. 1242:21:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 1219:Picture with accidentals 941:03:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC) 831:11:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 689:04:31, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC) 644:13:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 637:Symbols for sharps/flats 627:08:03, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC) 612:10:16, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC) 604:15:15, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC) 596:04:46, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) 526:19:27 Mar 16, 2003 (UTC) 222:20:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 192:09:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 148:13:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 75:Symbols for sharps/flats 2060:i like parentheses and 978:14:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC) 921:15:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC) 861: 727:05:33, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) 620:10:20, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC) 501:02:10 Nov 3, 2002 (UTC) 2169: 1461:The note naming system 1294:Modern musical symbols 1228: 2170: 2037:note (disambiguation) 1922:Note (disambiguation) 1898:430 articles link to 1859:note (disambiguation) 1226: 791:History of Note Names 42:of past discussions. 2382:regular verification 2184:from math import log 2112: 1861:' be moved to 'note' 1495:Additional citations 1097:Using both bes and h 392:modern western music 143:Internet devices. - 2372:After February 2018 1387:really vandalism? ( 862:Something's missing 242:for more details.-- 170:For sharp (#), use 162:For flats (b), use 99:For sharp (#), use 91:For flats (b), use 2426:InternetArchiveBot 2377:InternetArchiveBot 2165: 2156: 2039:should move here. 1229: 165:''b''</sup: --> 2402: 2163: 2160: 2009: 1996:per Georgia guy. 1882:note (typography) 1774:Tremendous oppose 1732: 1700: 1697:non-admin closure 1631:comment added by 1620:alternate tunings 1565:Double minuscules 1479:comment added by 1418: 1371:comment added by 1361:Math and science? 1269: 1257:comment added by 1205:Promotional links 1045: 1033:comment added by 1019: 1007:comment added by 952:comment added by 923: 911:comment added by 510:is replaced by a 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:Talk:Musical note 2444: 2436: 2427: 2400: 2399: 2378: 2323: 2317: 2202: 2189:C5Freq = 523.251 2174: 2172: 2171: 2166: 2164: 2162: 2161: 2158: 2147: 2142: 2141: 2091: 2043: 2023: 2007: 2003: 2001: 2000:CookieMonster755 1715: 1694: 1679: 1643: 1491: 1453: 1415: 1410: 1408: 1403: 1383: 1336:musical notation 1313: 1309:Musical notation 1307: 1252: 1247:Connected notes? 1157:nl:Toon_(muziek) 1125:uni-magdeburg.de 1107:harmonieasten.nl 1091:Flute tabulature 1002: 964: 906: 817:Octave numbering 594:Clayton D. Jones 237: 236: 175: 167: 118: 111: 104: 96: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2452: 2451: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2430: 2425: 2393: 2386:have permission 2376: 2350:this simple FaQ 2335: 2321: 2315: 2292: 2180: 2151: 2133: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2100: 2087: 2041: 2021: 2005: 1999: 1853:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1675: 1665: 1633:129.116.182.195 1626: 1622: 1567: 1497: 1474: 1463: 1451: 1444: 1413: 1406: 1401: 1393: 1366: 1363: 1311: 1305: 1249: 1221: 1207: 1051: 998: 985: 970: 947: 872:French language 864: 839: 819: 793: 780: 709: 654: 455: 450: 443:Gregorian Chant 423:of their scale. 254: 234: 233: 171: 163: 116:bb</sup: --> 114: 109:##</sup: --> 107: 100: 92: 77: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2450: 2448: 2420: 2419: 2412: 2365: 2364: 2356:Added archive 2334: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2291: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2234: 2233: 2200: 2195: 2190: 2185: 2175: 2154: 2150: 2145: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2129: 2126: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2108: 2104: 2101: 2099: 2098: 2084:requested move 2078: 2077: 2076: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2014: 1991: 1962: 1948:WP:ASTONISHing 1944:strong support 1941: 1915: 1891: 1875: 1846: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1754:something else 1736: 1734: 1687: 1686: 1672:requested move 1666: 1664: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1566: 1563: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1533:Specifically? 1528: 1527: 1496: 1493: 1469: 1467: 1462: 1459: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1392: 1385: 1373:76.166.173.239 1362: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1323: 1316: 1248: 1245: 1220: 1217: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1140: 1139: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1122: 1116: 1110: 1104: 1098: 1092: 1082: 1081: 1050: 1047: 1009:86.120.210.195 997: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 984: 981: 969: 966: 892: 891: 863: 860: 856: 855: 848: 847: 838: 837:Note Frequency 835: 834: 833: 818: 815: 814: 813: 792: 789: 779: 778:Staff position 776: 775: 774: 750: 749: 737:Adam J. Sporka 729: 728: 708: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 698:Adam J. Sporka 691: 690: 678: 677: 671: 665: 653: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 629: 628: 621: 606: 598: 589: 588: 574: 573: 546: 545: 540: 539: 538: 537: 528: 527: 504: 503: 502: 466: 460: 459: 451: 448: 447: 439:Guido d'Arezzo 427: 426: 425: 415: 414: 410: 409: 403: 402: 398: 397: 387: 386: 383: 380: 377: 374: 371: 368: 365: 362: 359: 356: 353: 350: 347: 344: 338: 337: 334: 317: 316: 315: 303: 294: 293: 290: 287: 275: 274: 271: 268: 253: 252:Older comments 250: 240:Template:Music 230:Template:Music 227: 226: 225: 224: 210: 204: 201: 195: 194: 185: 181: 180: 179: 178: 177: 176: 173:#</sup: --> 168: 124: 123: 122: 121: 120: 119: 112: 105: 102:#</sup: --> 97: 94:b</sup: --> 76: 73: 70: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2449: 2440: 2439: 2434: 2429: 2428: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2397: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2373: 2368: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2351: 2347: 2343: 2338: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2318: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2289: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2203: 2201:20.2499708327 2178: 2152: 2148: 2143: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2127: 2124: 2121: 2118: 2115: 2102: 2097: 2095: 2090: 2085: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2066:76.120.162.73 2063: 2059: 2056: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2044: 2038: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2029: 2028: 2024: 2018: 2015: 2013: 2010: 2008: 2002: 1995: 1992: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1963: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1942: 1940: 1937: 1933: 1932: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1901: 1895: 1892: 1890: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1860: 1854: 1850: 1847: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1832: 1829: 1828: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1733: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1698: 1692: 1685: 1683: 1678: 1673: 1668: 1667: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1619: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1564: 1562: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1550:Tag removed. 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1494: 1492: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1481:88.103.75.159 1478: 1471: 1460: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1449: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1416: 1409: 1404: 1398: 1397:is reasonable 1390: 1386: 1384: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1360: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1337: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1321: 1317: 1314: 1310: 1302: 1301: 1296: 1295: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1259:76.187.190.10 1256: 1246: 1244: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1225: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1204: 1198: 1195: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1158: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1145: 1138: 1135: 1131: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1119:muziekabcd.nl 1117: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1103:Guitar chords 1102: 1101:gitaartabs.nl 1099: 1096: 1093: 1090: 1089:angelfire.com 1087: 1086: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1066: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1048: 1046: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1035:70.55.175.221 1032: 1026: 1020: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 995: 989: 988: 987: 986: 982: 980: 979: 976: 968:Tone and note 967: 965: 963: 959: 955: 954:86.167.48.163 951: 943: 942: 938: 934: 930: 924: 922: 918: 914: 910: 902: 901: 898: 890: 886: 882: 878: 873: 869: 868: 867: 859: 853: 852: 851: 844: 843: 842: 836: 832: 829: 825: 824: 823: 816: 812: 809: 805: 804: 803: 802: 799: 790: 788: 786: 777: 773: 770: 766: 765: 764: 763: 760: 756: 747: 742: 741: 740: 738: 734: 726: 723:Sounds good. 722: 721: 720: 718: 713: 706: 699: 695: 694: 693: 692: 688: 684: 680: 679: 675: 672: 669: 666: 663: 660: 659: 658: 651: 645: 642: 638: 634: 633: 631: 630: 626: 622: 619: 615: 614: 613: 611: 605: 603: 597: 595: 587: 583: 582: 581: 579: 572: 568: 567: 566: 564: 559: 558: 554: 550: 542: 541: 536: 532: 531: 530: 529: 525: 521: 520: 519: 517: 513: 509: 500: 495: 494: 493: 492: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 465: 464: 457: 456: 454: 446: 444: 440: 436: 433:rather than 432: 424: 422: 421:key signature 417: 416: 412: 411: 408: 405: 404: 400: 399: 396: 393: 389: 388: 384: 381: 378: 375: 372: 369: 366: 363: 360: 357: 354: 351: 348: 345: 343: 340: 339: 335: 333: 331: 327: 322: 321: 320: 314: 310: 306: 305: 304: 301: 300: 297: 295: 291: 288: 285: 284: 282: 281: 276: 272: 269: 266: 265: 263: 262: 258: 251: 249: 248: 245: 241: 231: 223: 219: 215: 211: 209: 205: 202: 200:Good, except: 199: 198: 197: 196: 193: 190: 186: 183: 182: 172:"<sup: --> 169: 164:"<sup: --> 161: 160: 159: 158: 156: 152: 151: 150: 149: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 113: 106: 101:"<sup: --> 98: 93:"<sup: --> 90: 89: 88: 87: 86: 85: 84: 81: 74: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2424: 2421: 2396:source check 2375: 2369: 2366: 2342:Musical note 2339: 2336: 2293: 2204: 2179: 2106: 2088: 2081: 2062:Note (music) 2057: 2046: 2026: 2016: 1997: 1993: 1977:Note (music) 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1943: 1929: 1917: 1899: 1893: 1877: 1856: 1848: 1830: 1773: 1742:Musical note 1735: 1714: 1690: 1688: 1676: 1669: 1627:— Preceding 1623: 1604:Palpalpalpal 1571:Palpalpalpal 1568: 1549: 1498: 1472: 1464: 1445: 1396: 1394: 1364: 1334: 1330: 1319: 1304: 1300:Beam (music) 1298: 1292: 1250: 1230: 1208: 1178: 1141: 1063:Fixed it. -- 1062: 1052: 1029:— Preceding 1021: 999: 983:Other issues 971: 944: 928: 925: 903: 893: 865: 857: 849: 840: 820: 794: 783:decision? -- 781: 751: 730: 714: 710: 673: 667: 661: 655: 625:4.65.244.206 607: 599: 590: 575: 560: 547: 511: 507: 505: 499:Someone else 470:quarter note 467: 461: 453: 434: 430: 428: 418: 406: 395: 341: 323: 318: 308: 302: 299: 298: 296: 283: 278: 277: 264: 260: 259: 255: 228: 154: 125: 80:31-May-2007: 79: 78: 60: 43: 37: 2311:Georgia guy 2297:Georgia guy 2094:move review 1952:65.94.43.89 1931:kennethaw88 1920:, and move 1836:WildWikiGuy 1782:Georgia guy 1750:note-taking 1682:move review 1475:—Preceding 1367:—Preceding 1253:—Preceding 1169:musician... 1003:—Preceding 948:—Preceding 913:68.40.84.68 907:—Preceding 635:See above: 449:Gen Ita 36:This is an 2433:Report bug 1275:Note value 1127:see page 9 1113:klezmer.be 1095:scarlet.be 309:déjà écrit 2416:this tool 2409:this tool 2256:Woodstone 2223:Woodstone 2199:print(C5) 1981:Wahoofive 1973:X (music) 1969:Musical X 1586:miniscule 1428:Woodstone 1234:Woodstone 1144:Woodstone 1134:Woodstone 1076:Woodstone 881:Wahoofive 828:Woodstone 808:Woodstone 785:Wahoofive 757:names. -- 746:Woodstone 733:talk page 717:Wahoofive 707:Note name 618:Dysprosia 586:Camembert 571:Camembert 535:Camembert 474:half note 280:attempt: 214:Wahoofive 189:Woodstone 137:C-natural 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 2422:Cheers.— 1965:Comment: 1746:banknote 1629:unsigned 1590:Hyacinth 1552:Hyacinth 1535:Hyacinth 1517:Dicklyon 1501:Hyacinth 1477:unsigned 1448:Jubilee♫ 1442:US usage 1369:unsigned 1341:hatnotes 1315:nav box. 1255:unsigned 1121:Interval 1031:unsigned 1005:unsigned 950:unsigned 909:unsigned 725:Hyacinth 491:Merphant 370:semitone 352:semitone 2346:my edit 2058:Comment 2017:Support 1994:Support 1918:Support 1905:Wbm1058 1896:. Over 1894:Comment 1878:Support 1865:Ebonelm 1849:Support 1831:Support 1812:Wbm1058 1722:Amakuru 1703:Amakuru 1649:dbolton 1452:clipman 1279:Dbolton 1115:Klezmer 897:Madmaxx 877:solfege 755:solfege 687:bdesham 641:Wikid77 610:Tarquin 602:echidna 578:Tarquin 563:Tarquin 549:Bencze1 544:that :) 524:Tarquin 486:solfege 330:octaves 313:Tarquin 244:Dbolton 145:Wikid77 129:F-sharp 39:archive 2270:SGA314 2242:SGA314 2208:SGA314 2006:(talk) 1584:Since 1407:googol 1402:number 1211:aruffo 1109:Scales 905:(LG) 668:B flat 238:. See 133:A-flat 2198:: --> 2197:: --> 2196:: --> 2193:: --> 2192:: --> 2191:: --> 2188:: --> 2187:: --> 2186:: --> 2183:: --> 2182:: --> 2181:: --> 2047:Slash 2027:Slash 1886:Peter 1798:: --> 1797:: --> 1760:: --> 1759:: --> 1752:, or 1691:Moved 1466:Rusia 1414:edits 1194:Espoo 1065:Espoo 1056:Espoo 975:Njarl 769:euyyn 759:Pesto 478:sharp 326:scale 311:? -- 16:< 2322:ᛏᚨᛚᚲ 2316:ᛒᚨᛊᛖ 2301:talk 2274:talk 2260:talk 2246:talk 2227:talk 2212:talk 2070:talk 2042:Red 2022:Red 1985:talk 1956:talk 1936:talk 1926:Note 1909:talk 1900:Note 1869:talk 1840:talk 1816:talk 1802:talk 1786:talk 1764:talk 1738:Note 1726:talk 1718:Note 1707:talk 1653:talk 1637:talk 1608:talk 1594:talk 1575:talk 1556:talk 1539:talk 1521:talk 1505:talk 1485:talk 1432:talk 1389:here 1377:talk 1349:talk 1345:Jtir 1343:. -- 1331:note 1327:lead 1320:Note 1297:and 1283:talk 1263:talk 1238:talk 1039:talk 1013:talk 958:talk 937:talk 917:talk 885:talk 870:The 735:. -- 685:. -- 683:note 553:talk 516:Egil 482:flat 480:and 382:tone 376:tone 364:tone 358:tone 346:tone 218:talk 141:Wifi 2390:RfC 2360:to 2153:440 2135:log 2086:. 1924:to 929:not 798:ds5 639:. - 463:JFQ 135:or 2403:. 2398:}} 2394:{{ 2325:) 2303:) 2276:) 2262:) 2248:) 2229:) 2214:) 2159:Hz 2144:⁡ 2131:× 2128:12 2122:69 2072:) 1987:) 1958:) 1934:• 1911:) 1884:. 1871:) 1842:) 1818:) 1804:) 1788:) 1780:. 1766:) 1756:. 1748:, 1740:→ 1728:) 1709:) 1701:— 1674:. 1655:) 1639:) 1610:) 1596:) 1577:) 1558:) 1541:) 1523:) 1507:) 1487:) 1434:) 1379:) 1351:) 1312:}} 1306:{{ 1285:) 1265:) 1240:) 1192:-- 1041:) 1015:) 960:) 939:) 919:) 887:) 592:-- 555:) 472:, 220:) 131:, 2435:) 2431:( 2418:. 2411:. 2319:( 2299:( 2272:( 2258:( 2244:( 2225:( 2210:( 2206:- 2149:f 2139:2 2125:+ 2119:= 2116:p 2068:( 1983:( 1954:( 1907:( 1867:( 1838:( 1814:( 1800:( 1784:( 1778:? 1762:( 1724:( 1705:( 1699:) 1695:( 1651:( 1635:( 1606:( 1592:( 1573:( 1554:( 1537:( 1519:( 1503:( 1483:( 1430:( 1426:− 1417:) 1411:( 1391:) 1375:( 1347:( 1281:( 1261:( 1236:( 1232:− 1037:( 1011:( 956:( 935:( 915:( 883:( 744:− 674:F 662:A 551:( 512:H 508:B 385:A 379:G 373:F 367:E 361:D 355:C 349:B 342:A 235:♯ 216:( 212:— 187:− 174:" 166:" 155:b 117:" 110:" 103:" 95:" 50:.

Index

Talk:Musical note
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
F-sharp
A-flat
C-natural
Wifi
Wikid77
13:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Woodstone
09:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of style (music)
Wahoofive
talk
20:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Template:Music
Template:Music
Dbolton
20:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Tarquin
scale
octaves
modern western music
key signature
Guido d'Arezzo
Gregorian Chant
JFQ
quarter note

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.