224:
276:
255:
442:
There's either an attempt to throw everything out while smirking, to a degree of in-curiosity that would make most people guffaw if it were about, say, history, or even literary criticism. Of course, it got to this point for a reason, and the fault ends up lying at the feet of the sophisticated whom whence bore the cultured theoreticians.
286:
386:
I completely agree. Your comment is absolutely correct. Most WP articles on music theory leave me even more confused than when I started reading. Unfortunately, a bunch of musical nerds who would find it challenging to describe a swift kick in the nuts have apparently taken charge of all such WP
441:
Yes, music theory articles (and frankly, a lot of music theory literature) is simply not well-written in the way that other academic genres try to be. I think it has something to do with the elitist dialectic both continued by and levied against historical music practice, classical music, etc.
426:
I find
Knowledge (XXG) articles on music to be a wonderful resource for learning things that are quite hard to find systematically presented elsewhere. So: we shouldn't get rid of anything! Merel getting rid of stuff doesn't make things easier to understand. However, we should add more
387:
articles: and the utterly incomprehensible and almost reference-free result is plain for all to see. Or not. Half-time score: WP editors 1, Music 0. I hereby challenge every single statement in this article lacking a reliable source - that's about 98% of the entire content (see
367:
While the sentences may be very precise, without examples and simple explanatory text, these articles are useless and off-putting for many users. I've gone through several articles: notes, harmonics, pure tone, consonance and dissonance, and frankly didn't learn much.
409:
just says "Gravity is what makes things fall down." In every subject, there's a superficial way to understand it, suitable for beginners, and a more detailed way that delves into the details. It's silly to pretend there's some easy way to balance that.
494:
I'm not sure how common it is, but in a score for the Gliere Harp
Concerto, link below, there are enharmonic names for harp pedaling using the German system such as 'Fes' pg 34, 'His" pg 63, 'Eis' pg 74 that do not appear in the article table.
153:
470:
Unfortunately there is a lot that goes into the abstract concept of a "musical note" that this article needs to discuss. Simplified
Knowledge (XXG) is better suited for dumbing down subjects...see
147:
342:
307:, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
635:
332:
79:
640:
308:
85:
630:
501:
299:
260:
537:
44:
30:
608:
99:
364:
These musical articles are written in too complicated manner. Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to be method of learning for lay people.
104:
20:
74:
235:
65:
168:
135:
574:
Like the writer who inserted the text now marked "citation needed", I recall from long-ago college music lessons that
194:
190:
584:
symbol arose from German handwriting (modern "sch") of old-style letters "ſch" ≈ "#" as a scrawled abbreviation for
185:
109:
203:
541:
241:
129:
612:
508:
479:
396:
376:
531:
Doublesharps: "Aydoublesharp", "ceedoublesharp", "deedoublesharp", "efdoublesharp" and "geedoublesharp".
502:
https://petruccimusiclibrary.ca/files/imglnks/caimg/7/74/IMSLP863829-PMLP1198871-Gliere_Harp_Concerto.pdf
125:
55:
504:
70:
372:
445:
223:
175:
432:
415:
161:
534:
Doubleflats: "Aydoubleflat", "beedoubleflat", "deedoubleflat", "edoubleflat" and "geedoubleflat".
457:
208:
475:
392:
51:
205:
525:
Sharps: "Aysharp", "beesharp", "ceesharp", "deesharp", "esharp", "efsharp" and "geesharp".
444:
The article should be exactly as complex as its topic needs to be for a general audience,
141:
388:
428:
411:
597:
symbol is a minute handwritten letter "b", and is an abbreviation for the German word
624:
450:
528:
Flats: "Ayflat", "beeflat", "ceeflat", "deeflat", "eflat", "efflat" and "geeflat".
304:
291:
24:
522:
The names of the notes in full is "ay", "bee", "cee", "dee", "e", "ef" and "gee".
498:
I'll leave it to someone else to decide if these should be added to the table.
281:
207:
406:
391:) - and intend to remove all un-reffed statements within a fortnight.
616:
545:
512:
483:
462:
436:
419:
400:
380:
275:
254:
427:
introductory stuff at the beginning of articles, for beginners.
474:
and if that is not sufficiently simple then please edit that.
217:
209:
15:
471:
605:
But alas, I have no source at hand to back that claim up.
571:
seems credible, the origins of sharp and flat seem wrong.
601:– a now-unused word for flat, or "plain and unappealing".
371:
Take my comments to heart, and simplify these articles.
160:
303:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
174:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
8:
567:Although the description of the note-letter
249:
472:https://simple.wikipedia.org/Musical_note
317:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Music theory
251:
221:
7:
636:Top-importance Music theory articles
360:Musical articles are too complicated
297:This article is within the scope of
490:Names of notes in various languages
240:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
641:WikiProject Music theory articles
320:Template:WikiProject Music theory
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
284:
274:
253:
222:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
405:Yeah, just like the article on
337:This article has been rated as
513:21:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
1:
631:C-Class Music theory articles
420:03:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
401:01:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
311:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
617:04:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
484:03:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
463:22:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
437:22:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
546:12:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
657:
518:Names of the notes in full
381:10:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
343:project's importance scale
458:
448:is very good advice, imo.
336:
269:
248:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
300:WikiProject Music theory
230:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
323:Music theory articles
234:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
105:No original research
236:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
551:Origin of sharp (
357:
356:
353:
352:
349:
348:
216:
215:
66:Assume good faith
43:
648:
596:
595:
583:
582:
562:
561:
556:
555:
465:
460:
455:
325:
324:
321:
318:
315:
294:
289:
288:
287:
278:
271:
270:
265:
257:
250:
233:
227:
226:
218:
210:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
656:
655:
651:
650:
649:
647:
646:
645:
621:
620:
593:
592:
580:
579:
565:
559:
558:
553:
552:
520:
492:
451:
449:
362:
322:
319:
316:
313:
312:
290:
285:
283:
263:
231:
212:
211:
206:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
654:
652:
644:
643:
638:
633:
623:
622:
603:
602:
589:
564:
549:
538:189.50.182.128
519:
516:
491:
488:
487:
486:
468:
467:
466:
443:
424:
423:
422:
361:
358:
355:
354:
351:
350:
347:
346:
339:Top-importance
335:
329:
328:
326:
309:the discussion
296:
295:
279:
267:
266:
264:Top‑importance
258:
246:
245:
239:
228:
214:
213:
204:
202:
201:
198:
197:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
653:
642:
639:
637:
634:
632:
629:
628:
626:
619:
618:
614:
610:
606:
600:
590:
587:
577:
576:
575:
572:
570:
550:
548:
547:
543:
539:
535:
532:
529:
526:
523:
517:
515:
514:
510:
506:
503:
499:
496:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
464:
461:
456:
454:
447:
440:
439:
438:
434:
430:
425:
421:
417:
413:
408:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
385:
384:
383:
382:
378:
374:
369:
365:
359:
344:
340:
334:
331:
330:
327:
310:
306:
302:
301:
293:
282:
280:
277:
273:
272:
268:
262:
259:
256:
252:
247:
243:
237:
229:
225:
220:
219:
200:
199:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
609:166.199.8.37
607:
604:
598:
585:
573:
568:
566:
557:) and flat (
536:
533:
530:
527:
524:
521:
505:Burchseymour
500:
497:
493:
476:Em3rgent0rdr
452:
393:MinorProphet
370:
366:
363:
338:
314:Music theory
305:music theory
298:
292:Music portal
261:Music theory
242:WikiProjects
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
25:Musical note
19:This is the
148:free images
31:not a forum
625:Categories
446:WP:ONEDOWN
373:PeterB1517
563:) symbols
429:John Baez
412:Wahoofive
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
588:(sharp).
453:Remsense
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
407:Gravity
341:on the
232:C-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
586:scharf
238:scale.
126:Google
599:blatt
389:WP:RS
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
613:talk
591:The
578:The
542:talk
509:talk
480:talk
433:talk
416:talk
397:talk
377:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
333:Top
176:TWL
627::
615:)
544:)
511:)
482:)
435:)
418:)
399:)
379:)
193:,
156:)
54:;
611:(
594:♭
581:♯
569:H
560:♭
554:♯
540:(
507:(
478:(
459:留
431:(
414:(
410:—
395:(
375:(
345:.
244::
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
