49:
227:
The article's well-written and comprehensive. It's stable and well-organized. The sources used appear extremely reliable and I have no doubt that the information's accurate (without reading the foreign sources). I'm going to pass the article with the hope that you'll still consider my suggestions.
168:
The other sections read very well. Your prose is very professional, and reads like any old journal article. My one other nitpick is the very choppy records section. I understand that writing these records in one big jumbled section would be even choppier, so I think it's fine as is.
160:- Could you clarify what "first described" means? I think it's saying that it was originally only thought to live there, and if that's the case, it wasn't described from there, unless that's where scientists described it... yes, a clarification would be nice.
172:
Yes. The species may now be well-known enough that such a detailed discussion of records is superfluous, but I think the list remains interesting (and I had fun tracking down all the records!).
183:
The sources you used seem reliable as a whole. I'm slightly confused why the IUCN source has a link to the website's homepage and the others don't, could you please clarify?
87:
54:
77:
133:
196:
I suppose you could not find any free pictures of the bat. Perhaps you could add another image of one of the other bats that's aesthetically nice?
129:
114:
59:
106:
82:
205:
122:
254:
236:
17:
148:
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. It looks rather good, and I don't have many suggestions.
268:
213:
99:
23:
248:
230:
187:
None of the others are part of a greater work, as the IUCN Red List account is.
271:
261:
216:
158:
First described in 2001 from Greece and
Hungary, its known distribution*
141:
110:
163:The former is indeed what is meant; I've reworded.
8:
37:
208:, which looks kind of like it might be
68:
40:
7:
31:
1:
243:17:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
212:, with its white ear bases.
272:19:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
262:17:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
217:19:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
288:
206:File:Myotis mystacinus.jpg
24:Talk:Myotis alcathoe/GA1
204:. I'm interested in
96:
95:
22:(Redirected from
18:Talk:Alcathoe bat
279:
259:
251:
241:
233:
146:
137:
118:
50:Copyvio detector
38:
27:
287:
286:
282:
281:
280:
278:
277:
276:
255:
249:
237:
231:
225:
194:
181:
154:
127:
104:
98:
92:
64:
36:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
285:
283:
275:
274:
224:
221:
220:
219:
193:
190:
189:
188:
180:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
166:
165:
164:
153:
150:
147:
94:
93:
91:
90:
85:
80:
74:
71:
70:
66:
65:
63:
62:
60:External links
57:
52:
46:
43:
42:
35:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
284:
273:
270:
266:
265:
264:
263:
260:
258:
253:
252:
246:
242:
240:
235:
234:
222:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
202:M. mystacinus
200:Added one of
199:
198:
197:
191:
186:
185:
184:
178:
171:
170:
167:
162:
161:
159:
156:
155:
151:
149:
145:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
103:
102:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
75:
73:
72:
67:
61:
58:
56:
53:
51:
48:
47:
45:
44:
39:
33:
25:
19:
256:
247:
244:
238:
229:
226:
209:
201:
195:
182:
157:
142:
138:
124:Article talk
123:
119:
100:
97:
88:Instructions
267:Thank you!
111:visual edit
179:References
55:Authorship
41:GA toolbox
245:Reviewer:
78:Templates
69:Reviewing
34:GA Review
210:alcathoe
83:Criteria
223:Overall
134:history
115:history
101:Article
269:Ucucha
214:Ucucha
192:Images
250:ceran
232:ceran
152:Prose
143:Watch
16:<
257:thor
239:thor
130:edit
107:edit
132:|
113:|
109:|
139:·
136:)
128:(
120:·
117:)
105:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.