1298:). You are the reviewer and you have to make the decision here. To be a bit frank: I have sent about 50 railway articles through GAN previously, the majority reviewed by non-railfans, and I have gradually learned what they want from railway-related articles, and which I have incorporated into my writing style. This is not a FAC and you, as reviewer, have to make the call. This is about "decent prose" not "excellent" or "brilliant". GA articles are allowed to have shortcomings, but within limits. The review process is a one-man job, and if, as you say, all the criteria are met, then it is a pass. If
330:
306:
174:
143:
21:
1150:
sources. I'm not even going to attempt to translate technical terms. Could I ask you to amend the text according to your comments about the quill drive? Otherwise, the trains were rebuilt by DSB in
Copenhagen as there wasn't capacity in Kiel (Næss says so too, this is in the article). I have to go now, but I believe everything except the quill drive issue should be sorted out now. Again, thanks for helping out.
1034:" - this sentence is slightly off - "resilient drive" is a mechanical design it should probably read something like "Siemens built motors driving the wheels via resilient drive" - also very brief description of the "resilient drive" ie does it involve rubber - there are alternatives. A very brief description of the traction motors is needed - ie are they DC or AC etc, where are the mounted (axle, bogie or body)
380:
362:
112:
481:
460:
574:
390:
491:
802:
188:
1112:
issues 34,35,36. In fact I found some answers to questions above in the second link - it says that after being rejected by Norway the locomotives were rebuilt in
Denmark (do they mean Kiel in Schleswig-Holstein?) - afterwhich the top speed was limited to 140km/h - it also says the traction motors are
1345:
Just to clarify (after message from
Arsennik) - I am not formally passing this article simply because I am too much of a "railfan" to give a subjective opinion of whether or not this is a "good article" for the average reader. Please give feedback on the article as an "average reader" and pass/fail,
745:
Yes, there is still more work to be done with the article, including the infobox. I stopped where I did last night because I went to bed. All information in an infobox should be repeated in prose format. For locomotives, there will always be details which cannot be explained in the truncated format
666:
First of all, that would be 380 million in 1992-money and 480 million in 1999-money. Secondly, NSB incurred a cost for having non-functioning locomotives for several years, including having to operate expensive Di 3s. So yes, NSB got back more than they paid, but that was just to cover their costs.
1012:
Regarding this and the four points below: there are no publicly available reliable sources with this information. I would love to write more about the techincal specification, but this information is simply just not available. As it stands, the
Knowledge article is the only comprehensive piece of
1149:
I've added the two rail.lu links and written a little on the background for the CFL lease and the reduction of speed. Thank you for finding the other sources (I had found
Johnsern, but it doesn't really say anything the others don't). My German isn't great, so thank you in helping finding German
899:
The
Norwegian source, NOB and Loks-aus-Kiel (both German) all say 160, so there isn't a national divide. I have also seen a torque diagram that goes to 160, so the locomotives definitively have a maximum speed of 160, even if they may at one point have had an artificial reduction, or Siemens may
1302:
feel you need a second opinion, you can mark the nomination as such, but that must be your call, not mine. My advise from someone who has reviewed 250+ articles is that unless there are prose issues left (which is my
Achilles heel), you should just pass the article and get it out of the world.
1077:
Thank you for the review, it is much appreciated to have a knowledgeable person look over the article. I've answered the questions and amended the text, although as mentioned, there are no comprehensive sources on the locomotive, making any further dwelling on the specification difficult.
895:
but was removed. It's not clear why the difference exists - the vehicles have been operated in more than one country - so the two top speeds may apply to each country. Or the may refer to different definitions of top speed, or a typo - I don't know. Needs clarity.
886:
I think the article is well written and illustrated with typical images of liveries and trains operated. A number of key technical points need mentioning or clarifying - this only need amount to a small amount of additional text, essentially to disambiguate.
1375:
No problem. I think that is perfectly reasonable. In the future if you wish to get a non-expert/prose checker involved you can change the status of the template on the article talk page to "2ndopinion". I will give my opinion on this article below soon.
1165:
Yes ok. I also removed Nord-OsteeBahn from the first list of lessors - the order of the text sort of suggests this is a
Dispolok lease list - but the NOB leases came later. I doubt anyone would ever have been seriously mislead by that, but I changed it
764:
Note - Siemens quotes a top speed of 140km/hr for the ME26, whilst others quote 160. (The MaK DE1024 is also 160km/h) - I don't know why this is - it might be a top approved speed for lease use in germany - but that is a
315:
153:
1256:(outdent) What remains now? I delinked the three you proposed. As noted above, redlinks is not a problem, and to be quite frank I have no interest in creating articles on German private railway companies.
1441:
The issue never reached the courts, after a 5 May 1999 announcement by the companies that they had reached an agreement for the trains to be returned to
Siemens, and NOK 485 million be compensated to NSB.
1360:
Also I am a notoriously bad speller, and poor prose writer, and as I understand it the main author writes in their second language - so a double check of spelling and grammar would be appreciated. Thanks
1217:
The companies KEP Logistik, NetLog
Netzwerklogistik, Schneider & Schneider don't turn up much at all on my radar - it's possible that they are not big enough to be notable, and should be de-linked.
600:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
746:
of the infobox. Feel free to add additional specs in the infobox, just don't remove them from the prose. Otherwise, I'll get around to adding them when I have some more time on my hands. Regards,
645:
The article claims that the contract was valued at NOK 380 million but the return was given NOK 485 million - this makes 95million profit for NSB (not to mention more 80 million NOK discount) eg
1231:
The other companies are definately notable - I have noticed that some people have been slowly completing the german private railway company articles so possibly they will be done at a later date.
1589:
320:
1108:- www.rail.lu is a long established website and good on history - I don't know how reliable they are on locomotives - it tells that more information on these locomotives was published in
1594:
900:
simply have misinformed. The footnote is still there, but is in the prose rather than the infobox (as far as I'm aware, it is not possible two have to links to the same footnote).
936:
The source simply says "generator", which is why the confusion arises. The text later refers to the "main generator", which would indicate that NSB built an auxiliary generator.
1584:
1280:. You (certainly) need a third opinion - specifically a non "rail fan" opinion should be necessary so as to see how this article reads for the more normal (non-expert) reader.
339:
157:
1121:- rail.lu calls it a "Kardanhohlwelle" though from the image I don't think it is a true "cardan shaft" as is understood in english - though the overall effect is identical.
32:
1569:
1471:
The units were originally equipped with a galley and toilet for the engineer, and has head end power, allowing it to haul passenger trains in addition to freight trains
1579:
840:
266:
830:
1614:
1048:
Also some of the companies mentioed are red-linked - a few are minor and excusable, others are more notable eg Osthavelländische Eisenbahn, SeeHafen Kiel.
1032:
Transmission is conducted via three-phase gate turn-off thyristor pulse-width modulation inverters with a resilient drive powering the Siemens-built motors
436:
1574:
919:
Several components were to be manufactured by NSB, including the fuel tanks, sandboxes, engine frames, generators and some components for the bogies."
1629:
1599:
807:
547:
537:
442:
276:
1411:
sentence seems to suggest that they were already there. "In particular" could most likely be removed as it doesn't make the sentence any clearer.
1634:
1604:
1619:
891:
There's an issue about the top speed - one source quotes 140 km/h , others 160km/h - it was previously mentioned as a note in the article
50:
1624:
513:
1609:
1177:
in 2002 - it never was big enough to be notable - as far as I know it operated a single or maybe two train paths. I have redirected
412:
238:
234:
1294:
If it helps, a near literal translation was just passed as GA on the Norwegian Knowledge with pro votes by eight non-railfans (see
1564:
627:
1277:
835:
38:
1414:
Specs are quite technical, but wikilinks help and it is not bad enough that I can't get the general gist of what is being said
812:
1409:
Di 6 was in particular needed for freight and passenger trains on the Nordland Line, and to a lesser extent on the Røros Line
207:
1178:
719:
Do you want more technical details in the infobox? I notice the article presents a lot of the info (lenght, height, etc) in
1135:
also mentions a few other minor things such as change in headlight arrangement post NSB - easily confirmed from the images.
1114:
504:
465:
879:
403:
367:
230:
221:
148:
123:
1043:
Type of load supporting structure needs mentioning - ie monocoque, or 'girder type' - are the side panels load bearing?
1009:
Electrical transmission - additional info requested here which depends on the clarification above about the generator
623:
1325:
page. How can I help? I am definately not a rail fan and can provide a non-expert second opinion if that is needed.
981:
The locomotives were purchased for passenger use - I am not familiar with NSB practice - does this include
854:
1203:
129:
20:
989:) - if 'head end power' is supplied this needs describing - ie powered from where, how much watts. etc
1532:
I have marked this as GA, as I too can pass it (can I actually do this - or does an admin need to ??)
1190:
1182:
957:" also needs clarifying - as written it suggests catastrophic failure - can more be said on this.?
580:
512:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
411:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1533:
1483:
1430:
1362:
1347:
1322:
1310:
1281:
1267:
1232:
1218:
1157:
1136:
1122:
1085:
1069:
1049:
1020:
999:
971:
943:
926:
907:
869:
766:
753:
724:
703:
683:
674:
652:
329:
1510:
1443:
This doesn't read right, might be a run-on sentence. Maybe add a semi-colon and slight reword?
1387:
1336:
1257:
858:
584:
90:
42:
1447:
There were also changes to the cab walls with internal railings and the toilets were removed.
964:", which literally means "track forces". Perhaps there is a different and more correct term?
1537:
1366:
1351:
1285:
1236:
1222:
1140:
1126:
1053:
922:
873:
770:
728:
687:
656:
992:
Yes, that is what I mean with 'train power supply', although I've changed the wording now.
955:
the bogies had faults, as they were not strong enough to support the locomotive's weight
1170:
982:
605:
496:
226:
305:
173:
142:
1558:
1478:
1473:
Does the galley have head end power or the whole unit? I think this needs rewording.
1425:
1305:
1262:
1211:
1197:
1152:
1080:
1064:
1015:
994:
986:
966:
938:
902:
748:
698:
669:
612:
395:
242:
197:
1500:
1377:
1326:
1207:
933:- if DC then "DC generator" can be used to avoid confusion. This needs clarifying.
682:
ok as long as you are sure - I don't know the exchange rates or inflation on NOK.
1094:
1118:
1407:
Little bit confused in the history section. When was the Di 6 introduced? The
930:
573:
486:
480:
459:
385:
1013:
information on the locomotives, everything else published is just fragments.
608:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1186:
1174:
1113:
bogie mounted and gives an image of the "resilient drive" - I think this is
379:
361:
1260:
says it is better to leave links red than create artificially short stubs.
1105:
861:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1295:
1214:
as a subsidiary but that article needs much more work before that is valid
1110:
EDF Etudes et Documentation Ferroviaires (Eisenbahn - Technik und Betrieb)
1101:
1346:
I can assure that I have no issues now with technical content. Thank you.
696:
I'm Norwegian, a railfan and an economist, so I'm pretty sure its right.
1465:
The diesel-electric locomotive has a MaK 12-cylinder 12M282 prime mover
509:
408:
929:
as the link suggests - if the latter then if AC the usual phrase is
1040:
Method of transmitting traction from wheel to body needs mentioning
187:
1499:
Looks good to me. In my opinion this qualifies as a Good article.
720:
229:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
1541:
1513:
1486:
1433:
1390:
1370:
1355:
1339:
1313:
1289:
1270:
1240:
1226:
1160:
1144:
1130:
1088:
1072:
1057:
1037:
Suspension system needs clarifying - more specific - what type?
1023:
1002:
974:
946:
910:
883:
774:
756:
732:
706:
691:
677:
660:
631:
1185:
and will either expand that later, or create its own article.
105:
328:
304:
225:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
761:
ok I've added to the infobox - I'll let you do the rest...
233:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
892:
646:
83:
1404:
Suggest adding a non-breaking space between Di and 6.
1210:
so I made a redirect. VPS is a potential redirect to
1093:
Yes "too high track forces" makes much more sense :
921:- are the "generators" auxilliary generators, as in
508:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
407:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
611:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
287:
1321:I have come here after reading the message on the
1115:de:Hohlwellen-Antrieb#Kardan-Gummiringfederantrieb
441:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1590:Low-importance Rail transport in Germany articles
1476:Thanks for the comments, all has been seen to.
1455:Consist of? Were they leasing them as a group?
1276:Personally I can't see any issues in terms of
1095:http://www.johnsern.com/materiell/di6/di6.html
48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1595:Rail transport in Germany task force articles
985:(or is this supplied by a second vehicle (eg
8:
1467:. Is prime mover another name for an engine?
1585:GA-Class Rail transport in Germany articles
723:form and not in the box - which is unusual.
1461:Should this be "Another six units were..."
790:
454:
356:
284:
137:
62:
15:
1062:Red-links should not be an issue at GAN.
1570:Engineering and technology good articles
1106:http://www.rail.lu/materiel/cflme26.html
316:the Rail transport in Germany task force
33:Engineering and technology good articles
1459:Six units were initially leased to CFL.
1102:http://www.rail.lu/materiel/nsbdi6.html
821:
793:
565:File:Logo NS.jpg Nominated for Deletion
456:
358:
139:
1580:Low-importance rail transport articles
620:This notification is provided by a Bot
1453:Later leasers consist of Cargolink...
583:, has been nominated for deletion at
7:
502:This article is within the scope of
401:This article is within the scope of
219:This article is within the scope of
111:
109:
1449:Internal railings added or removed?
615:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
288:Associated projects or task forces:
128:It is of interest to the following
1615:Unknown-importance Norway articles
1418:as they had too high track forces.
14:
1423:I've created an article on this.
960:This is an attempt to translate "
41:. If you can improve it further,
1575:GA-Class rail transport articles
572:
489:
479:
458:
388:
378:
360:
186:
172:
141:
110:
19:
1630:Low-importance Germany articles
1600:Locomotives task force articles
1278:Knowledge:Good article criteria
579:An image used in this article,
542:This article has been rated as
271:This article has been rated as
589:Deletion requests October 2011
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
1542:12:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
522:Knowledge:WikiProject Germany
516:and see a list of open tasks.
415:and see a list of open tasks.
337:This article is supported by
313:This article is supported by
239:WikiProject Trains to do list
1635:WikiProject Germany articles
1605:All WikiProject Trains pages
1514:08:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
1487:21:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
1434:08:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
1420:Don't know what this means?
1391:23:46, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
1371:23:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
1356:23:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
1340:06:31, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
1314:21:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
1290:20:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
1271:10:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
1241:19:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
1227:19:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
1196:I will probably also create
1161:09:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
1145:12:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
1131:12:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
1117:or very similar - a sort of
1089:11:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
1073:11:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
1058:22:41, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
1024:11:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
1003:11:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
975:11:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
947:11:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
911:11:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
884:22:41, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
775:17:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
757:09:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
733:00:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
707:09:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
692:00:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
678:23:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
661:01:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
632:15:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
525:Template:WikiProject Germany
421:Knowledge:WikiProject Norway
251:Knowledge:WikiProject Trains
1620:WikiProject Norway articles
587:in the following category:
424:Template:WikiProject Norway
254:Template:WikiProject Trains
1651:
1169:I fixed a few red links -
548:project's importance scale
443:project's importance scale
340:the Locomotives task force
277:project's importance scale
1625:GA-Class Germany articles
541:
474:
440:
373:
336:
312:
283:
270:
167:
136:
65:
61:
1610:GA-Class Norway articles
1179:Neuss-Düsseldorfer Häfen
1565:Knowledge good articles
1206:was already covered in
257:rail transport articles
1193:which now mentions it.
624:CommonsNotificationBot
333:
309:
118:This article is rated
1204:Regental Bahnbetriebs
1189:is a new redirect to
332:
308:
39:good article criteria
1399:Aircorns 2nd opinion
1191:Rhein-Sieg-Eisenbahn
91:Good article nominee
917:The article states
505:WikiProject Germany
1481:
1428:
1308:
1265:
1155:
1083:
1067:
1018:
997:
969:
941:
927:Electric generator
905:
751:
701:
672:
613:fair use rationale
404:WikiProject Norway
334:
310:
222:WikiProject Trains
124:content assessment
66:Article milestones
1479:
1426:
1306:
1263:
1153:
1097:confirms that too
1081:
1065:
1016:
995:
967:
939:
903:
859:Talk:NSB Di 6/GA1
849:
848:
749:
699:
670:
638:
637:
593:What should I do?
585:Wikimedia Commons
562:
561:
558:
557:
554:
553:
453:
452:
449:
448:
355:
354:
351:
350:
347:
346:
217:
216:
104:
103:
100:
99:
84:February 12, 2012
57:
1642:
1508:
1485:
1432:
1385:
1334:
1312:
1269:
1183:DĂĽsseldorf-Hafen
1173:was absorbed in
1159:
1087:
1071:
1022:
1001:
973:
953:The claim that "
945:
923:Engine-generator
909:
803:Copyvio detector
791:
755:
705:
676:
651:Is this a typo?
604:If the image is
581:File:Logo NS.jpg
576:
569:
568:
530:
529:
528:Germany articles
526:
523:
520:
499:
494:
493:
492:
483:
476:
475:
470:
462:
455:
429:
428:
425:
422:
419:
398:
393:
392:
391:
382:
375:
374:
364:
357:
295:
285:
259:
258:
255:
252:
249:
190:
181:
180:
176:
169:
168:
163:
160:
145:
138:
121:
115:
114:
113:
106:
86:
63:
46:
23:
16:
1650:
1649:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1555:
1554:
1502:
1477:
1424:
1401:
1379:
1328:
1304:
1261:
1151:
1079:
1063:
1014:
993:
965:
937:
901:
853:This review is
845:
817:
789:
747:
697:
668:
643:
567:
527:
524:
521:
518:
517:
495:
490:
488:
468:
427:Norway articles
426:
423:
420:
417:
416:
394:
389:
387:
293:
256:
253:
250:
247:
246:
218:
192:
191:
161:
151:
122:on Knowledge's
119:
82:
12:
11:
5:
1648:
1646:
1638:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1602:
1597:
1592:
1587:
1582:
1577:
1572:
1567:
1557:
1556:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1468:
1462:
1456:
1450:
1444:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1415:
1412:
1405:
1400:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1358:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1229:
1215:
1201:
1194:
1171:Hoyer Railserv
1167:
1133:
1098:
1045:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1035:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1007:
1006:
1005:
983:head end power
979:
978:
977:
951:
950:
949:
925:, or are they
915:
914:
913:
864:
863:
847:
846:
844:
843:
838:
833:
827:
824:
823:
819:
818:
816:
815:
813:External links
810:
805:
799:
796:
795:
788:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
762:
738:
737:
736:
735:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
642:
639:
636:
635:
617:
616:
609:
595:
594:
577:
566:
563:
560:
559:
556:
555:
552:
551:
544:Low-importance
540:
534:
533:
531:
514:the discussion
501:
500:
497:Germany portal
484:
472:
471:
469:Low‑importance
463:
451:
450:
447:
446:
439:
433:
432:
430:
413:the discussion
400:
399:
383:
371:
370:
365:
353:
352:
349:
348:
345:
344:
335:
325:
324:
321:Low-importance
311:
301:
300:
298:
296:
290:
289:
281:
280:
273:Low-importance
269:
263:
262:
260:
227:rail transport
215:
214:
211:
203:
202:
193:
185:
184:
179:
177:
165:
164:
162:Low‑importance
146:
134:
133:
127:
116:
102:
101:
98:
97:
94:
87:
79:
78:
75:
72:
68:
67:
59:
58:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1647:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1621:
1618:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1596:
1593:
1591:
1588:
1586:
1583:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1573:
1571:
1568:
1566:
1563:
1562:
1560:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1515:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1506:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1488:
1484:
1482:
1475:
1474:
1472:
1469:
1466:
1463:
1460:
1457:
1454:
1451:
1448:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1429:
1422:
1421:
1419:
1416:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1392:
1389:
1386:
1384:
1383:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1359:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1338:
1335:
1333:
1332:
1324:
1315:
1311:
1309:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1266:
1259:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1212:Salzgitter AG
1209:
1205:
1202:
1199:
1198:HSL Logistics
1195:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1156:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1100:I just found
1099:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1086:
1084:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1068:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1039:
1036:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1019:
1011:
1010:
1008:
1004:
1000:
998:
991:
990:
988:
987:generator van
984:
980:
976:
972:
970:
963:
959:
958:
956:
952:
948:
944:
942:
935:
934:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
906:
898:
897:
894:
890:
889:
888:
885:
881:
878:
875:
871:
868:
862:
860:
856:
851:
850:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
828:
826:
825:
820:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
800:
798:
797:
792:
786:
776:
772:
768:
763:
760:
759:
758:
754:
752:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
717:
716:
715:
708:
704:
702:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
681:
680:
679:
675:
673:
665:
664:
663:
662:
658:
654:
649:
648:
640:
634:
633:
629:
625:
621:
614:
610:
607:
603:
602:
601:
599:
592:
591:
590:
586:
582:
578:
575:
571:
570:
564:
549:
545:
539:
536:
535:
532:
515:
511:
507:
506:
498:
487:
485:
482:
478:
477:
473:
467:
464:
461:
457:
444:
438:
435:
434:
431:
414:
410:
406:
405:
397:
396:Norway portal
386:
384:
381:
377:
376:
372:
369:
366:
363:
359:
342:
341:
331:
327:
326:
322:
319:(assessed as
318:
317:
307:
303:
302:
299:
297:
292:
291:
286:
282:
278:
274:
268:
265:
264:
261:
244:
243:Trains Portal
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
223:
213:week 7, 2012
212:
210:
209:
205:
204:
201:
200:
199:
198:Trains Portal
194:
189:
183:
182:
178:
175:
171:
170:
166:
159:
155:
150:
147:
144:
140:
135:
131:
125:
117:
108:
107:
95:
93:
92:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
73:
70:
69:
64:
60:
55:
53:
52:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1504:
1503:
1470:
1464:
1458:
1452:
1446:
1440:
1417:
1408:
1381:
1380:
1330:
1329:
1320:
1299:
1255:
1208:Regentalbahn
1109:
1031:
961:
954:
918:
876:
866:
865:
852:
841:Instructions
650:
644:
619:
618:
597:
596:
588:
543:
503:
402:
338:
314:
272:
237:. See also:
231:project page
220:
206:
196:
195:
130:WikiProjects
89:
49:
47:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
1119:quill drive
962:sporkrefter
855:transcluded
598:Don't panic
158:Locomotives
1559:Categories
1258:WP:REDLINK
931:Alternator
808:Authorship
794:GA toolbox
235:discussion
154:in Germany
37:under the
1187:RSE Cargo
1175:Rail4Chem
867:Reviewer:
831:Templates
822:Reviewing
787:GA Review
1480:Arsenikk
1427:Arsenikk
1307:Arsenikk
1264:Arsenikk
1154:Arsenikk
1082:Arsenikk
1066:Arsenikk
1017:Arsenikk
996:Arsenikk
968:Arsenikk
940:Arsenikk
904:Arsenikk
880:contribs
836:Criteria
750:Arsenikk
700:Arsenikk
671:Arsenikk
606:non-free
241:and the
120:GA-class
51:reassess
27:NSB Di 6
1166:anyway.
647:version
546:on the
519:Germany
510:Germany
466:Germany
275:on the
74:Process
1534:Mddkpp
1511:(talk)
1388:(talk)
1363:Mddkpp
1361:again.
1348:Mddkpp
1337:(talk)
1323:WT:GAN
1282:Mddkpp
1233:Mddkpp
1219:Mddkpp
1200:(done)
1137:Mddkpp
1123:Mddkpp
1050:Mddkpp
870:Mddkpp
767:Mddkpp
765:guess.
725:Mddkpp
684:Mddkpp
653:Mddkpp
418:Norway
409:Norway
368:Norway
248:Trains
149:Trains
126:scale.
96:Listed
77:Result
857:from
721:prose
1538:talk
1505:corn
1382:corn
1367:talk
1352:talk
1331:corn
1296:here
1286:talk
1237:talk
1223:talk
1141:talk
1127:talk
1104:and
1054:talk
893:diff
874:talk
771:talk
729:talk
688:talk
657:talk
628:talk
71:Date
1501:AIR
1378:AIR
1327:AIR
1300:you
1181:to
641:NOK
538:Low
437:???
267:Low
208:Sel
1561::
1540:)
1369:)
1354:)
1288:)
1239:)
1225:)
1143:)
1129:)
1056:)
882:)
773:)
731:)
690:)
659:)
630:)
622:--
323:).
294:/
156:/
152::
54:it
45:.
1536:(
1365:(
1350:(
1284:(
1235:(
1221:(
1139:(
1125:(
1052:(
1030:"
877:·
872:(
769:(
727:(
686:(
655:(
626:(
550:.
445:.
343:.
279:.
245:.
132::
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
