1478:, there is a list of Nobel Prizes. It lists 5, all of which it introduces with identical preludes: “The Nobel prize in…”. Economics is not among them, it and it alone has a separate introduction “The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel”. The committee could have called it the Nobel Prize in Economics, and they deliberately did not. They consistently type out the much longer name to underscore the fact that, while this award is every bit as prestigious as the Nobels, it is not one. This page is confusing and incorrect.
623:
983:
1193:
868:
847:
262:
973:
952:
321:
543:
369:
767:
749:
614:
777:
1502:
232:
1108:
878:
677:
1071:
1151:
656:
1547:
1400:
The Nobel
Foundation administers 6 prizes: 5 Nobel Prizes & the Prize in Economics. Of course their website lists winners of all 6. The Knowledge (XXG) article clearly says in the first sentence that there's only 5, mirroring Nobel's will and what the Nobel Foundation says. Britannica says there are six and that is a clear error.
1230:
still states, the
Swedish central bank made a donation). But this article is not "Prizes administered by the Nobel Foundation". It is "Nobel Prizes" and the Prize in Economics is not one. This is not up for debate. If someone wants to propose moving the article to "Prizes administered by the Nobel Foundation" for some
1360:. The Economics prize is listed there, with a distinct title that indicates that it is a memorial prize not created by Nobel himself. The Nobel Foundation seems to think that the English phrase "The Nobel Prizes" (not "the Prizes administered by the Nobel Foundation") encompasses the Economics prize. I look at
1399:
Did you read your own link? The Nobel
Foundation clearly lists "the Nobel Prizes and the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel" winners on that page. But that implies that the Prize in Economics is not a Nobel Prize (as they explicitly say in the referenced citation).
1384:
it doesn't count. They need to persuade the community that speakers of the
English language would not commonly regard the Economics prize as encompassed in the phrase "the Nobel Prizes" and would not expect to find information on it in this article. Given the state of the sources, that seems like an
1249:
is linked to in the head, its status is clearly summarized, and more details are available for that commonly associated Prize. I believe revising the article as I did greatly improves readability, clarity, and communicates accurate information to the reader. This is not malicious and doesn't warrant
1238:
Since this is an article on Nobel Prizes, listing a commonly misidentified Prize (because it is administered by the same organization) does belong in the head, and it still does in my revision. My revision did not erase the existence or relationship of the Prize in
Economics. Suggesting that the 5
1229:
suggestions that the Prize in
Economics is a Nobel Prize. This is the Nobel Prize article, and as is clearly stated in the revision, the Prize in Economics is unambigously labeled "Not a Nobel Prize" by the Nobel Foundation. It is often affiliated with the Nobel Prize (because, as the head clearly
1422:
is "All Nobel Prizes". They could have placed the economics prize on another page or called the page something like "All prices administered by the Nobel
Foundation", but they didn't. If the Nobel Foundation can include the economics prize on a page called "All Nobel Prizes" while explaining the
1403:
There is no Nobel Prize in
Economics. The Prize in Economics is "Not a Nobel" as the Nobel Foundation clearly says. This article is about Nobel Prizes, and there are only five of those. There is a related prize administered by the Nobel Foundation, and the proposed revision clearly discusses and
1339:
It was not a wholesale removal. There is still nearly an entire paragraph in the head of the article (2nd paragraph) addressing the relationship with the Prize in
Economics to the Nobel Prizes. Interested readers are made aware and given links to learn more about this related prize.
1277:. We appreciate your original edits but you are not entitled to use reversions to retain the version of the article that you prefer over the objections of other editors. Reach a consensus here in Talk and then perhaps you can restore your edits if other editors agree with them.
1234:
reason, that's on them, and that article should include large sections on the Prize in
Economics. I think Nobel Prize the preferred article title. And with that being the article name and title, it doesn't deserve long and repeated tangents to another prize.
1319:
In my reversion, I noted "Several prev discussions there support at least some mention, even if it's not what Nobel originally created/intended." Regarding your edit behavior, "you removed, someone reinstated" is definitely not even a
1663:
1324:
consensus, as "somone reinstated" means someone disagrees (whether or not they explain why), and now you know that over time, there have been multiple editors who seem they would voice explicit opposition its wholesale removal.
1573:
There's a section pointing out the discrepancy in figures for awards to men as opposed to awards for women, and then notes a perfectly legitimate reason - that there's more men in theese fields So then how is it controversial?
1375:
that gives the Economics prize equal coverage to the other prizes. If contributor 2601:547:900:DD70:...etc wants this article to not give the Economics prize equal space with the others, it's not sufficient to argue that
1014:
1599:
Since most of the money from the Nobel foundation seems to be going to the partying - isn't somebody else supposed to pay for that if the will states "the interest on which is to be distributed annually as prizes"?
1653:
1423:
difference then we can include it on a page called "Nobel Prize" while explaining the difference, especially when it's common for other reliable sources to do it (often without explaining the difference). Stop
166:
731:
1668:
627:
1177:
1738:
530:
473:
454:
1623:
1049:
332:
1723:
1305:
So you have surveyed every other Knowledge (XXG) editor and know no one objects? One person does not a consensus make. You need to persuade editors to openly agree with you.
1039:
1633:
1292:
1255:
223:
1728:
1009:
160:
1718:
511:
492:
92:
1648:
1128:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.
1005:
996:
957:
1733:
1577:
The sentence "reflecting a time when gender bias in the relevant fields was greater" well what is this 'gender bias'? How has it significantly lessened?
1743:
934:
829:
1243:
and the whole article was blighted by it. Having the Economics Prize listed under "Awarded for" in the Infobox for Nobel Prize was simply inaccurate.
1246:
1115:
1658:
98:
1708:
1678:
924:
721:
1441:
On the linked page the following text is at the top. The Sveriges Riksbank Prize is not a Nobel. If it were why would they differentiate it so?
1296:
1259:
350:
1713:
1638:
1368:, albeit noting that it "is not technically a Nobel Prize". I look at mainstream media coverage, see articles about the Nobel Prizes such as
1698:
1601:
1530:
43:
900:
799:
697:
1479:
1445:
1405:
1341:
57:
1628:
553:
1131:
1119:
338:
112:
1703:
1688:
1673:
1444:
Between 1901 and 2022, the Nobel Prizes and the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel were awarded
1093:
117:
33:
1693:
1643:
1207:
823:
587:
87:
583:
579:
575:
571:
891:
852:
790:
754:
684:
661:
636:
567:
563:
1004:
content on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
78:
899:-related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
559:
181:
148:
1291:
There are no other objections of other editors. There's just immediate revisions without any comments from mostly you.
1199:
303:
1001:
299:
231:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
198:
1508:
1137:
122:
1092:
For more information about external reviews of Knowledge (XXG) articles and about this review in particular, see
988:
242:
1683:
1605:
1534:
642:
1483:
1449:
142:
1409:
1390:
1345:
1231:
307:
68:
1432:
798:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
696:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
320:
138:
83:
542:
368:
1558:
1554:
435:
416:
397:
1163:
1125:
342:
1585:
188:
174:
1321:
1386:
247:
1282:
64:
1251:
1475:
1428:
1419:
1357:
1330:
1310:
1079:
261:
244:
1274:
1365:
270:
1424:
1270:
154:
1369:
867:
846:
1581:
972:
951:
1617:
883:
782:
1278:
1203:
1170:. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
1326:
1306:
1167:
37:
1240:
1226:
1070:
978:
873:
772:
766:
748:
547:
1404:
provides information about that related prizes in the head of the article.
1140:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
298:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
676:
655:
246:
1664:
Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
896:
795:
1609:
1589:
1562:
1538:
1487:
1453:
1436:
1413:
1394:
1349:
1334:
1314:
1300:
1286:
1263:
693:
689:
1529:
Use British spelling of the words characterize and organization.
1356:
I go to the official site nobelprize.org and look up the list of
1595:"the interest on which is to be distributed annually as prizes"
1496:
1187:
1145:
1102:
1065:
607:
256:
248:
28:
15:
1654:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Society and social sciences
1159:
Talk:Nobel Prize/Why Isn't There a Nobel Prize in Mathematics
1221:
Economics Prize inclusion despite being "Not a Nobel Prize"
546:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1008:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1420:
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/lists/all-nobel-prizes/
1198:
On 1 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be
1172:
1158:
523:
504:
485:
466:
447:
428:
409:
390:
1669:
GA-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
173:
1739:
Externally peer reviewed articles by Nature (journal)
895:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
794:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
688:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
187:
828:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1624:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use British English
1364:; it includes details of the Economics prize in
46:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1493:Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2023
1239:Nobel Prizes are just the "original" prizes is
1024:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History of Science
348:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1250:immediate revision as a perfectly reasonable
1225:The article has large sections that tried to
1015:History of Science Collaboration of the Month
8:
1176:; for the discussion at that location, see
1724:Top-importance history of science articles
946:
841:
743:
650:
362:
315:
274:, which has its own spelling conventions (
1634:Social sciences and society good articles
1247:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences
1000:, an attempt to improve and organize the
333:Social sciences and society good articles
1729:WikiProject History of Science articles
1027:Template:WikiProject History of Science
948:
843:
745:
652:
1649:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles
306:, this should not be changed without
7:
1744:Knowledge (XXG) controversial topics
1719:GA-Class history of science articles
1470:There is no Nobel Prize in Economics
1418:As MartinPoulter said, the title of
889:This article is within the scope of
788:This article is within the scope of
682:This article is within the scope of
613:
611:
641:It is of interest to the following
36:for discussing improvements to the
1694:Unknown-importance Norway articles
909:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sweden
808:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Norway
706:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Awards
14:
1734:Externally peer reviewed articles
341:. If you can improve it further,
63:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1545:
1500:
1385:uphill battle to put it mildly.
1191:
1149:
1106:
1069:
981:
971:
950:
876:
866:
845:
775:
765:
747:
675:
654:
621:
612:
541:
367:
319:
260:
230:
58:Click here to start a new topic.
1659:GA-Class level-4 vital articles
1366:its article on the Nobel Prizes
1130:Content must be written from a
1114:The subject of this article is
1044:This article has been rated as
929:This article has been rated as
726:This article has been rated as
1709:Top-importance Sweden articles
1679:Top-importance awards articles
1580:21:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
1563:03:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
1089:It was found to have 5 errors.
1012:. You can also help with the
997:History of Science WikiProject
329:has been listed as one of the
1:
1629:Knowledge (XXG) good articles
1610:07:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
1590:21:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
1539:23:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
1076:This article was reviewed by
903:and see a list of open tasks.
802:and see a list of open tasks.
700:and see a list of open tasks.
55:Put new text under old text.
1714:All WikiProject Sweden pages
1639:Old requests for peer review
1437:15:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
1414:17:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
1395:18:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
1350:17:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
1335:15:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
1315:13:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
1301:13:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
1293:2601:547:900:DD70:0:0:0:ACE7
1256:2601:547:900:DD70:0:0:0:ACE7
994:This article is part of the
1699:WikiProject Norway articles
1523:to reactivate your request.
1511:has been answered. Set the
1287:14:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
1264:09:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
1124:When updating the article,
1030:history of science articles
912:Template:WikiProject Sweden
811:Template:WikiProject Norway
709:Template:WikiProject Awards
1760:
1050:project's importance scale
935:project's importance scale
830:project's importance scale
531:Featured article candidate
474:Featured article candidate
455:Featured article candidate
1126:be bold, but not reckless
1043:
989:History of science portal
966:
928:
861:
827:
760:
725:
670:
649:
594:
540:
365:
361:
93:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
1704:GA-Class Sweden articles
1689:GA-Class Norway articles
1674:GA-Class awards articles
1488:03:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
1454:02:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
21:
1644:GA-Class vital articles
1474:On the Nobel prize site
1569:Inventing controversey
1118:and content may be in
1084:on December 14, 2005.
88:avoid personal attacks
1156:The contents of the
1132:neutral point of view
635:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
628:level-4 vital article
339:good article criteria
224:Auto-archiving period
113:Neutral point of view
436:Good article nominee
417:Good article nominee
398:Good article nominee
304:relevant style guide
300:varieties of English
118:No original research
1427:against consensus.
302:. According to the
1021:History of Science
1002:history of science
958:History of Science
892:WikiProject Sweden
791:WikiProject Norway
685:WikiProject Awards
637:content assessment
373:Article milestones
99:dispute resolution
60:
1527:
1526:
1218:
1217:
1184:
1183:
1144:
1143:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1064:
1063:
1060:
1059:
1056:
1055:
945:
944:
941:
940:
840:
839:
836:
835:
742:
741:
738:
737:
606:
605:
602:
601:
588:December 10, 2023
584:December 10, 2013
580:December 10, 2009
576:December 10, 2008
572:December 10, 2007
568:December 10, 2006
564:December 10, 2005
560:December 10, 2004
448:February 27, 2010
429:February 15, 2010
357:
314:
313:
255:
254:
79:Assume good faith
56:
27:
26:
1751:
1553:
1549:
1548:
1518:
1514:
1504:
1503:
1497:
1476:Nobel prize site
1370:this one in the
1358:All Nobel Prizes
1206:. The result of
1195:
1194:
1188:
1175:
1153:
1152:
1146:
1110:
1109:
1103:
1091:
1080:Nature (journal)
1073:
1066:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1025:
1022:
991:
986:
985:
984:
975:
968:
967:
962:
954:
947:
917:
916:
913:
910:
907:
886:
881:
880:
879:
870:
863:
862:
857:
849:
842:
816:
815:
812:
809:
806:
785:
780:
779:
778:
769:
762:
761:
751:
744:
732:importance scale
714:
713:
710:
707:
704:
679:
672:
671:
666:
658:
651:
634:
625:
624:
617:
616:
615:
608:
595:Current status:
545:
526:
507:
488:
469:
450:
431:
412:
410:October 20, 2007
393:
372:
371:
363:
346:
323:
316:
267:This article is
264:
257:
249:
235:
234:
225:
192:
191:
177:
108:Article policies
29:
16:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1684:Awards articles
1614:
1613:
1597:
1571:
1546:
1544:
1516:
1512:
1501:
1495:
1472:
1223:
1192:
1171:
1150:
1107:
1029:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1019:
987:
982:
980:
960:
915:Sweden articles
914:
911:
908:
905:
904:
882:
877:
875:
855:
814:Norway articles
813:
810:
807:
804:
803:
781:
776:
774:
712:awards articles
711:
708:
705:
702:
701:
664:
632:
622:
522:
503:
484:
465:
446:
427:
408:
391:January 5, 2007
389:
366:
308:broad consensus
271:British English
251:
250:
245:
222:
134:
129:
128:
127:
104:
74:
12:
11:
5:
1757:
1755:
1747:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1731:
1726:
1721:
1716:
1711:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1686:
1681:
1676:
1671:
1666:
1661:
1656:
1651:
1646:
1641:
1636:
1631:
1626:
1616:
1615:
1602:151.40.125.129
1596:
1593:
1570:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1531:90.228.239.139
1525:
1524:
1505:
1494:
1491:
1471:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1442:
1401:
1372:New York Times
1354:
1353:
1352:
1317:
1269:Please review
1222:
1219:
1216:
1215:
1208:the discussion
1196:
1182:
1181:
1154:
1142:
1141:
1111:
1099:
1098:
1090:
1085:
1074:
1062:
1061:
1058:
1057:
1054:
1053:
1046:Top-importance
1042:
1036:
1035:
1033:
993:
992:
976:
964:
963:
961:Top‑importance
955:
943:
942:
939:
938:
931:Top-importance
927:
921:
920:
918:
901:the discussion
888:
887:
871:
859:
858:
856:Top‑importance
850:
838:
837:
834:
833:
826:
820:
819:
817:
800:the discussion
787:
786:
770:
758:
757:
752:
740:
739:
736:
735:
728:Top-importance
724:
718:
717:
715:
698:the discussion
680:
668:
667:
665:Top‑importance
659:
647:
646:
640:
618:
604:
603:
600:
599:
592:
591:
554:On this day...
538:
537:
534:
527:
519:
518:
515:
508:
500:
499:
496:
489:
486:April 14, 2010
481:
480:
477:
470:
462:
461:
458:
451:
443:
442:
439:
432:
424:
423:
420:
413:
405:
404:
401:
394:
386:
385:
382:
379:
375:
374:
359:
358:
324:
312:
311:
265:
253:
252:
243:
241:
240:
237:
236:
194:
193:
131:
130:
126:
125:
120:
115:
106:
105:
103:
102:
95:
90:
81:
75:
73:
72:
61:
52:
51:
48:
47:
41:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1756:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1732:
1730:
1727:
1725:
1722:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1685:
1682:
1680:
1677:
1675:
1672:
1670:
1667:
1665:
1662:
1660:
1657:
1655:
1652:
1650:
1647:
1645:
1642:
1640:
1637:
1635:
1632:
1630:
1627:
1625:
1622:
1621:
1619:
1612:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1594:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1578:
1575:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1522:
1519:parameter to
1510:
1506:
1499:
1498:
1492:
1490:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1480:108.31.21.117
1477:
1469:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:108.31.21.117
1443:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1406:128.237.82.18
1402:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1387:MartinPoulter
1383:
1379:
1374:
1373:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1342:128.237.82.18
1338:
1337:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1323:
1318:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1248:
1244:
1242:
1236:
1233:
1228:
1220:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1179:
1178:its talk page
1174:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1155:
1148:
1147:
1139:
1135:
1133:
1127:
1123:
1121:
1117:
1116:controversial
1112:
1105:
1104:
1095:
1088:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1075:
1072:
1068:
1067:
1051:
1047:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1034:
1017:
1016:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
998:
990:
979:
977:
974:
970:
969:
965:
959:
956:
953:
949:
936:
932:
926:
923:
922:
919:
902:
898:
894:
893:
885:
884:Sweden portal
874:
872:
869:
865:
864:
860:
854:
851:
848:
844:
831:
825:
822:
821:
818:
801:
797:
793:
792:
784:
783:Norway portal
773:
771:
768:
764:
763:
759:
756:
753:
750:
746:
733:
729:
723:
720:
719:
716:
699:
695:
691:
687:
686:
681:
678:
674:
673:
669:
663:
660:
657:
653:
648:
644:
638:
630:
629:
619:
610:
609:
598:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
555:
549:
544:
539:
535:
533:
532:
528:
525:
521:
520:
516:
514:
513:
509:
506:
502:
501:
497:
495:
494:
490:
487:
483:
482:
478:
476:
475:
471:
468:
467:April 3, 2010
464:
463:
459:
457:
456:
452:
449:
445:
444:
440:
438:
437:
433:
430:
426:
425:
421:
419:
418:
414:
411:
407:
406:
402:
400:
399:
395:
392:
388:
387:
383:
380:
377:
376:
370:
364:
360:
355:
353:
352:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
328:
325:
322:
318:
317:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
272:
266:
263:
259:
258:
239:
238:
233:
229:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
195:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
133:
132:
124:
123:Verifiability
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
100:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
70:
66:
65:Learn to edit
62:
59:
54:
53:
50:
49:
45:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
1598:
1579:
1576:
1572:
1550:
1528:
1520:
1509:edit request
1473:
1425:edit warring
1382:historically
1381:
1377:
1371:
1361:
1245:
1237:
1232:WP:NPOVTITLE
1224:
1211:
1204:Nobel Prizes
1185:
1157:
1129:
1113:
1086:
1078:
1077:
1045:
1013:
1006:project page
995:
930:
890:
789:
727:
683:
643:WikiProjects
626:
597:Good article
596:
551:
536:Not promoted
529:
524:July 2, 2010
510:
505:May 30, 2010
491:
479:Not promoted
472:
460:Not promoted
453:
434:
415:
396:
349:
347:
343:please do so
331:
330:
326:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
268:
227:
197:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
107:
32:This is the
1429:PrimeHunter
1378:technically
1173:its history
1168:Nobel Prize
512:Peer review
493:Peer review
327:Nobel Prize
269:written in
161:free images
44:not a forum
38:Nobel Prize
1618:Categories
1555:Pinchme123
1513:|answered=
1362:Britannica
1241:MOS:WEASEL
1227:MOS:WEASEL
1162:page were
1010:discussion
558:column on
422:Not listed
403:Not listed
337:under the
1582:Montalban
1322:WP:SILENT
1212:not moved
1138:citations
1094:this page
1087:Comments:
631:is rated
548:Main Page
280:travelled
101:if needed
84:Be polite
34:talk page
1136:Include
633:GA-class
517:Reviewed
498:Reviewed
351:reassess
292:artefact
199:Archives
69:get help
42:This is
40:article.
1279:ElKevbo
1252:WP:BOLD
1120:dispute
1048:on the
933:on the
730:on the
550:in the
381:Process
296:analyse
288:defence
228:90Â days
167:WPÂ refs
155:scholar
1327:DMacks
1307:331dot
1275:WP:BRD
1254:edit.
1164:merged
906:Sweden
897:Sweden
853:Sweden
805:Norway
796:Norway
755:Norway
703:Awards
694:prizes
690:awards
662:Awards
639:scale.
586:, and
441:Listed
384:Result
284:centre
276:colour
139:Google
1517:|ans=
1507:This
1271:WP:EW
1200:moved
1166:into
620:This
182:JSTOR
143:books
97:Seek
1606:talk
1586:talk
1559:talk
1551:Done
1535:talk
1484:talk
1450:talk
1433:talk
1410:talk
1391:talk
1346:talk
1331:talk
1311:talk
1297:talk
1283:talk
1273:and
1260:talk
1210:was
692:and
378:Date
175:FENS
149:news
86:and
1515:or
1380:or
1202:to
1040:Top
925:Top
824:???
722:Top
189:TWL
1620::
1608:)
1588:)
1561:)
1537:)
1521:no
1486:)
1452:)
1435:)
1412:)
1393:)
1348:)
1333:)
1313:)
1299:)
1285:)
1262:)
582:,
578:,
574:,
570:,
566:,
562:,
354:it
345:.
294:,
290:,
286:,
282:,
278:,
226::
218:,
214:,
210:,
206:,
169:)
67:;
1604:(
1584:(
1557:(
1533:(
1482:(
1448:(
1431:(
1408:(
1389:(
1344:(
1329:(
1309:(
1295:(
1281:(
1258:(
1214:.
1180:.
1134:.
1122:.
1096:.
1052:.
1018:.
937:.
832:.
734:.
645::
590:.
556:"
552:"
356:.
310:.
220:5
216:4
212:3
208:2
204:1
201::
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.