1349:
bad and this one is wonderfull" what could be "assumed a battle" or bad will. However I suppose you can be involved in such kind of action. As section name says this reflects just a arket position on background of device which use just the same design, or in other words it is the same phone construcion using different software. In this cathegories this is how the same construcion is received by market when use different software. As you pointed Nokia is +100 000 employe. Hard to believe they all have one and the same idea only and the same believs in every possible aspects. I suppose they are humans not robots or statistical numbers in papers. So trying different approaches. Perhaps you should refer to N10 protoype which was to be N9 successor, and which was/is to be triple boot machine. At boot user could open one of three systems: MeeGo, Android, Windows. Such phone would avoid problems you have with accepting different but still legitimate POV. Nokia offers devices with
Windows, Symbian, MeeGo, S40, "non system". Do they love each other or rather there is rivalisation beetwen them in market categories thinking?
411:
393:
1258:
company? That would be rather against facts, wouldn't be? It is not clear how that would be possible with reputable sources? And if several provided sources are not reputable then what sources would be reputable for you? In this way any source you donn't like can be "not reputable", what would make any article improvements impossible, and that would be against main idea of
Knowledge (XXG) IMHO. Or would you like to propose a limited list of reputable sources? Only for this article or for all articles in Knowledge (XXG)? Company officials are obligated to propagate a company marketing point of view, that would turn wikipedi into company marketing bulletin. Marketing approach especially of a company, or alianse of a fiew of them, involved in agressive marketing companies don't have to be adequate nither with neutral POV nor objective approach.
749:
this causes most probably Nokia wanted to protect their interests. And also the contract with
Microsoft causes N9 was in big trouble even to appear as a product in sell on market. Basic firmaware, kernel and procedures are MeeGo (and inside it contains Maemo and Mobilin) and above is Harmattan. From the other point one can say it is Maemo 6 and this will be true also. But saying Harmattan is not MeeGo is false, it is not "full" or "pure" MeeGo as there are Nokia additions which enforces some modifications. Nokia has introduce Harmattan as codename of MeeGo for smartphones, but there is also codename
74:
53:
496:
475:
176:
158:
269:
242:
337:
361:
506:
186:
550:
84:
22:
1854:
Q4 2011 report from Nokia says explicitly that the number of Lumia's sold is 1 million up to
January 26th (on the first page third line). Still, there are repeated edits that change the article to incorrectly claim that 1 million Lumias have been sold Q4. Also, adding POV statements like "trustworthy
1492:
I believe that basically all of the "Nokia N9 as a X" subsections and most of the "Application
Software" section has to be removed. Also, the full PR changelog is probably too much, I would put just a small table listing the key points. After this the article starts looking better, and can be used as
1827:
I don't think it would be appropriate to hide the fact that most reviewers recommended against buying the phone and I also don't see how reporting this fact is pushing a POV. On the other hand, I think you have a good point about N9's open source background. In fact, the active open source community
1379:
Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia with verifiable facts, not a blogging platform or a collection of rumors. Most of this "sources" I refer to are spin-offs of rumors; one source publish a rumor, twenty others publish a story based upon the first. This is nothing more than gossips. More importantly,
1348:
You have "assumed battle"? Have you declared a war? With whom or with what? This seems to be your POV. N9 has introduced a new standard in mobile phones, both in software and in design. This design has been used literaly identically by device using different software. I haven't seen any "this one is
1344:
Companies always provids currently promoted point of view and are specialised in using statistics to sell their truth, what does not mean that they provide untruthful information. This is art of marketing and attracting, used to interpret data in the way which is convininet for managment or current
1340:
Folowing your thinking there are no reputable sources as everything published anywhere is somebody's opinion which can be a roumor. And such places like
Techcrunch or Knowledge (XXG) is just a bucket of roumors. The concept of historical rumors is very interesting, anyway when diffrent sources says
1221:
A constructive way of presenting differing views is to present them both with their sources. As an example, Tomi Ahonen, a very outspoken former Nokia executive and present Nokia critic can give one side of the coin, then a reputable source the other POV -all this keeping in mind the importance and
748:
MeeGo is combined Maemo (Nokia) with
Mobilin (Intel), version prepared by Nokia for N9 is Harmattan and is also described as "MeeGo instance", you can't say it is not MeeGo - that would be against facts. Some software added by Nokia is not opensource and is dedicated for N9 and is inside Harmattan,
1257:
Mr(s) Caygill your opinion is unlogical and irrational IMHO. Deifferent and independent and reliable sources provided facts which are described and so sourced as
Knowledge (XXG) requires. If sales numbers would be different that would mean there are different sales of the same products by the same
1869:
Update: I kept the paragraph but removed all speculative numbers. Instead I added more sources to the claim that the N9 outsold the Lumias initially, which I think is interesting and relevant. I also completely removed the reference to
Canalys, because it was a forecast released before Nokia's Q4
1705:
I believe the biggest step left would be to rewrite these two sections. They could be combined, especially the "availability" part to the "reception" section. Any puffering of the "bad parent idea" should go, and be replaced with facts and quotes, explaining possible diffrences in perception. The
1109:
relies on research published by a Nokia N9 fanboy (pardon my straightforward language) Paul Bonner, just look at the articles contact info. Additionally the title is too long and heavily biased against WP7, simple "Market position" as title should be sufficient. I would consider merging this part
1408:
Some anonymous IP continues to change the numbers in the section Market
Position to something clearly wrong and I keep changing them back to what is reflected in the cited sources. On the other hand, I don't find these speculative numbers very relevant for the article. Maybe we just remove them?
1352:
Seems there is separate section. What you call "the impact of a "community" and the unusual activism surrounding N9" normally is assumed as howling succes or enthusiastic/positive market response. Seems you assume company marketing POV as binding. You want to separate launch, sell, marketing and
1635:
and removed half of the article, rearranged most of what was left and wrote a few new bits. Did not touch the "market share" section (I did move it though), although in my opinion it is too long. Hopefully it looks much better now. At least, with half of the garbage removed, one believes editor
1787:
The above sounds like pushing a POV, as, AFAIK, Knowledge (XXG) should not be the place to make suggestions as to what people should buy or not, since there is no justifiable reason to include some external reviewers' "do not buy" recommendations on the basis of Nokia having decided to move to
1488:
The article is currently mostly a mess. All the "Nokia N9 as a X" subsections in the hardware section look like something a student right out of PR school would write. They are of course not hardware related at all. Also, it seems that many developers are using the article to advertise their
619:
Lumia is not any continuation or successor by al means. It is of entirely different OS, of entirely closed instead open project, of entirely different policy and of entirely different customers target. This is discontinuation. What makes this is misleading and false information that Lumia is
1305:
and highlighting an assumed battle between device A vs B, misses completely the point of presenting this device in an encyclopedic article. Both devices are produced and sold by the same company, any rivalry and competition would normally refer to competing devices by competing brands and
1297:
Nokia is a +100.000 employee publicly listed company, mostly own by American constitutional investors; it is obligated to provide accurate and truthful investor information by law. Hence, why debating what someone said or assumed in November or December, when the actual fact can be found
1664:
that this article is kept as such, compact and readable, and sub-articles are created based on need and interest to cover software or other matters in lenghts. Looking again at the iPhone and iOS articles, they also use sub-articles to cover smaller parts of the OS and its
1489:
applications in subtle and non-that-subtle ways (i.e. the giant section on a single piece of software). Plenty of citations to forum posts, self-citations, and so on. This article is even for some reason referencing my own homepage where I don't talk about the N9 at all!
1639:
Feel free to revert any of my changes if you think you can improve what I deleted and make it fit with the rest of the article. But to be honest the only information I would be tempted to put back is the long changelog -- and maybe that would fit better in its own
1893:)from anon. IP are actually mine. Forgot to login. Interestingly, smartmo refers to talk page in the edit summary, but fails to discuss its disputed edits here. It is also a single-purpose account, but seems, as far as I can see, to have a lot of valid edits.
1805:
Looking forward, Nokia are going to have to support N9 for a few more years and the item is still in production. N9's open source background makes it possible to develop software for it for a much longer period than even Nokia's own planned support lifetime.
1433:, which is based on notable facts. It may also be noted that BOTH N9 and Lumia 710/800 had a very limited distribution at that time, only a handful of markets. All this has changed a lot, next useful data will be available after 2012 Q1 reports (soon). --
630:
This team of Jolla, where finally almost all members of the former MeeGo team in Nokia has joined as employees, so the Jolla is direct continuation of the N9 and the MeeGo team, unlike any team of Lumia which has nothing common with the N9 or the Linux
1380:
you mix now promotion with shareholder information. I refer to the latter, something a company cannot lie about, or they face legal consequences - in the US probably a massive class act lawsuit. But, what do you want to achieve, what do you suggest?
988:
Well, the good question is where to put the image of N950, if not there... The software is completely compatible, and hardware characteristics are mostly the same disregarding hardware keyboard. Would it be ok to create a separate article about N950?
1801:
That some reviewers did not recommend N9 for purchase is equal to some of the same (and other) reviewers having glowing reviews of Lumia phones, and not because of the devices' actual merits, but because Lumias are being marketed very aggressively.
1659:
My 2 cents worth of opinion: the length and structure gives now a much better feel and readability of the whole. It's easy enough to form an understanding of the device and, as such, it's a much better encyclopedic article. I humbly
1428:
The article uses various guesstimates between 500-600k devices to prove some point I really don't understand. But facts has been available for soon 2 months regarding the last quarter sales of 2011. The number is in the ballpark of
939:
Bad rather the English used that is in this article. Maybe of the Russian origin or retarded person, not sure. What is MeeGo not sure since understanding is bad and can't make out meaning since English is shitty have a nice day.
1577:
Layout/template. There are standards for Knowledge (XXG) articles. There is not yet a template, a suggestive model how to build a good mobile device article. Looking at many articles and their flamed debates, one would be very
1178:
How many more additional citations for verification of this section are needed? In movies James Bond treats 2 sources as enough to confirm a fact. Knowledge (XXG) is above this standard? Well J.B. was not using citations...
1205:
Keep it to the topic. The topic is N9, not Nokia's marketing strategy, not Lumia or WP, and certainly not some 4 month old guesstimates on which phone OS sell more than another. This is an encyclopedia, not a blogging
1309:
Of course there might be an own section, describing the impact of a "community" and the unusual activism surrounding N9. That is an own topic, not to be confused with the previous - launch and sales of N9.
1855:
analyst company Canalys". I will continue to revert such edits. As I said above, my other proposel would be to remove the whole paragraph, because all the N9 numbers are speculative. What do you think?
1791:
Including reviewers' negative suggestions because of an OS move alone may become a self-fulfilling prophecy in and of itself, as lower sales might lead to a cut and then a premature end of production.
370:
1782:"Still, many reviewers did not recommend to buy the N9, because of Nokia's earlier decision to drop MeeGo for Windows Phone for future smartphones — often questioning this decision at the same time."
2005:
1496:
Sadly, the entire article is protected for some triviliaty regarding sales numbers when compared to the Lumia 800. Sounds to me that you are centering on a mote when the entire article is a mess.
1023:
There should be own section for N950, because it is direct sister model for N9 and uses pretty much same hardware and software. No N950-article is just redirect to list of nokia phones. --
1003:
N950 deseves for separate article as phone given to developers óńly by manufacturer for development and not avible on normal market, however very very almost N9, but keyboard etc. IMHO
966:
Photo of N950 is not good idea as N9 does not have such a keyboard at all, I'd rather to remove it - can confuse somebody. And my english is worse then bad also. How extraordinary!...
1353:
market reception and you disagree that there is community of users? That kind of thinking would be quite strange and do not leaves any space neither for neutrality nor dofferent POV.
140:
1985:
616:
after Elop's killing that project ("no metter what a success N9 will be this is the last MeeGo device" - Steven Elop). By that decision no Lumia can be considered as successor.
1950:
130:
1236:
There are different sources provided. Its not clear how salles-numbers could have different views. Please provide serios sources that do not agree with the numbers given.
2000:
1788:
another operating system, as N9 has not been reported to have any defects or substantial shortcomings (unlike with much of the Lumia series because of Windows Phone 7.5).
375:
410:
392:
1748:
If the gap has been reduced, it should be said what the previous version was - ie the one with the larger gap. IINM, there's only been one version of the N9 released.
1828:
around Maemo was the main reason I bought the N9 myself. Maybe one could point this out in the article? This smartphone is a lot more than just its technical features!
106:
1294:. Normally opinions and bloggings do not constitute as reliable sources. They are opinions, not verifiable secondary sources, according to Knowledge (XXG) standards.
1831:
In fact, considering Nokia's current situation, it seems that the open source community around Meego and Maemo might be around much longer than Nokia itself.
327:
1945:
2020:
1995:
1133:
451:
567:
97:
58:
1970:
1919:) 19:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC) I leave his version stand for now. The version with my last edit from August 25 2012 has five more references he deleted.
317:
457:
1980:
351:
1798:
a cause-and-effect event actually happens, it could be written about with a reference to a reputable source that would confirm the course of events.
1683:
It still needs a lot of work, a lot of the sources are worthless and the prose is completely incoherent in parts and reads like a bad translation. --
2035:
1960:
589:
Absolutely, it's another family, another working model, another company. The only thing that Jolla has in common with N9 is that Mer forked Meego.
557:
208:
293:
2040:
1764:
879:
596:
528:
2025:
1955:
1794:
Once the phone is not available for sale anymore, the article should then include reviewers' recommendations and how these affected sales.
1186:
1164:
1071:
1049:
1004:
790:
760:
701:
427:
1965:
1243:
1117:
973:
947:
733:
676:
199:
163:
1975:
1530:
1354:
1265:
1143:
276:
247:
2030:
1430:
346:
252:
2015:
519:
480:
2010:
1809:
What the article should reflect could be features and shortcomings, as this would better inform potential users of the phone. -
1706:
long article tells also very little about N9's history, development and the assumed good reception. This could be expanded. --
418:
398:
33:
1990:
1395:
1134:
http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/nokia-windows-phone-sales-set-to-disappoint-1042773
1157:
Section has many citations from diffrent sources, then why it is still marked as single source? Can this be removed?
916:
623:
MeeGo team has decided they are not going to leave such promising project as MeeGo hence some persons has established
1105:
Meego sales and WP7 is not written objectively and all referenced articles rely on one another. Additionally source
1760:
1090:
902:
648:
Jolla is commonly considered as the N9 and Linux MeeGo continuator, just contrary to Elop who is creator of Lumias.
883:
1190:
1168:
1075:
1053:
1008:
764:
705:
600:
89:
1614:
ones look like a model to follow, if only because I guess most editors spend quite a lot of time with them. --
794:
39:
1247:
1121:
977:
951:
737:
1924:
1916:
1898:
1875:
1860:
1836:
1728:
1688:
1556:
1534:
1453:
1414:
1358:
1269:
1147:
680:
1756:
1752:
1383:
1261:
1239:
1182:
1160:
1139:
1113:
1086:
1067:
1045:
969:
943:
875:
786:
756:
729:
697:
592:
73:
52:
829:
289:
651:
In Knowledge (XXG) must not be false information, especially when they are against facts mentioned above.
869:
861:
781:
527:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
426:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
292:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
207:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1511:
Perhaps an article template would steer the mobile phone articles to a better quality and uniformity.--
1610:
A template would be nice indeed, though there are too many phone articles already... I think that the
1649:
1619:
1501:
924:
675:
The phone comes in black, cyan and magenta. Not dark red. Is there a good stock photo we could use?--
635:
1632:
21:
806:
1886:
639:
1920:
1912:
1894:
1871:
1856:
1832:
1724:
1684:
1552:
1529:
I agree, layout can be improved. That layout was a reason to protect the article? What template?
1449:
1410:
846:
656:
1818:
1890:
1711:
1670:
1591:
1583:
1516:
1471:
1438:
1391:
1315:
1227:
1211:
994:
836:
813:
191:
102:
1814:
850:
660:
1645:
1615:
1551:
This article is shit in it's current state and needs the flamethrowers turning upon it. --
1497:
1028:
920:
495:
474:
1136:
are all copy+pasting from one fanboy? Can you provide sources that confirm your thesis?
1106:
1101:
Market position of N9 & MeeGo ecosystem in comparison to Lumia & WP competition
899:
511:
805:
Thanks. This specification also from Nokia, but for developers does not state 802.11a
175:
157:
1939:
1341:
the same you claim they intentionaly lies. Could you provide sources confirming this?
1448:
That is Novel Synthesis and guesswork - you can't use those claims in an article. --
1707:
1666:
1587:
1579:
1512:
1467:
1434:
1387:
1311:
1223:
1207:
990:
832:
809:
1810:
1466:
Cameron Scott, you refer to the present article or the interim report figures?--
643:
360:
336:
268:
241:
1222:
weight of the matter, and what amount of space it should get in the article.--
1024:
501:
204:
185:
181:
79:
1085:
To my recollection, "Lankku" is correct, so I recommend leaving it as it is.
1870:
2011 results got published and is in contradiction with the actual numbers.
1611:
895:
285:
604:
1911:
I tried to discuss with him on his talk page. He refuses to discuss here.
1042:
The original name for the phone was Lankki. Lankki overrides Microsoft.
281:
750:
549:
524:
1064:
So "Lankku" ought to be replaced with "Lankki"? Which one is proper?
782:
http://europe.nokia.com/find-products/devices/nokia-n9/specifications
1290:
Presented figures and their sources in this article are historical
624:
423:
1745:"The gap between the glass and the display has been reduced"...
807:
http://www.developer.nokia.com/Devices/Device_specifications/N9/
753:
of MeeGo for most simple phones, sometimes called "non-system".
1928:
1902:
1879:
1864:
1840:
1768:
1732:
1715:
1692:
1674:
1653:
1623:
1595:
1560:
1538:
1520:
1505:
1475:
1457:
1442:
1418:
1399:
1362:
1319:
1273:
1251:
1231:
1215:
1194:
1172:
1151:
1125:
1110:
with another part of the article or making it more objective.
1094:
1079:
1057:
1032:
1012:
998:
981:
955:
928:
908:
887:
854:
840:
817:
798:
768:
741:
709:
684:
664:
15:
905:
359:
335:
634:
Jolla and MeeGo community has develop successors which are
1287:
You ask how sales figures can have different sources?
1107:
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/2/prweb9210845.htm
828:
The Nokia N9 also has an FM transmitter and receiver
2006:
C-Class Computer hardware articles of Mid-importance
724:
611:
Jolla mobile with Sailfish is continuation of N9 as:
523:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
422:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
280:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
203:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
456:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1776:Should reviewers' suggestions be included at all?
725:http://en.wikipedia.org/MeeGo#MeeGo.2FHarmattan
1775:
720:Harmattan is based on Maemo and is not MeeGo.
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Telecommunications
8:
1493:a starting point for something even better.
694:Too funny :P Obviously written by a Nokian
1986:C-Class software articles of Low-importance
1951:Low-importance Telecommunications articles
1701:"History and availability" and "Reception"
1381:
1180:
754:
469:
387:
236:
152:
47:
2001:Mid-importance Computer hardware articles
471:
389:
238:
154:
118:Template:WikiProject Telecommunications
49:
19:
217:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Technology
302:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
1132:So, sources like Bernstein Research
517:This article is within the scope of
416:This article is within the scope of
274:This article is within the scope of
197:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
1946:C-Class Telecommunications articles
537:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Finland
38:It is of interest to the following
2021:Unknown-importance Brands articles
1996:C-Class Computer hardware articles
436:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Brands
14:
1971:Low-importance Computing articles
1636:manpower will be better spent :)
1981:Low-importance software articles
548:
504:
494:
473:
409:
391:
267:
240:
184:
174:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
2036:Low-importance Finland articles
1961:WikiProject Technology articles
562:This article has been rated as
322:This article has been rated as
220:Template:WikiProject Technology
135:This article has been rated as
1586:) 11:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)--
999:08:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
982:12:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
956:07:05, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
305:Template:WikiProject Computing
98:WikiProject Telecommunications
1:
2041:All WikiProject Finland pages
1152:05:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
1126:18:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
1080:09:08, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
1058:01:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
1013:12:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
769:08:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
531:and see a list of open tasks.
430:and see a list of open tasks.
368:This article is supported by
344:This article is supported by
296:and see a list of open tasks.
211:and see a list of open tasks.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1033:08:21, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
605:12:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
540:Template:WikiProject Finland
371:Computer hardware task force
2026:WikiProject Brands articles
1956:C-Class Technology articles
1929:20:19, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
1903:18:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
1885:Last reverts of edits from
1880:21:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
1865:20:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
685:15:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
665:11:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
439:Template:WikiProject Brands
121:Telecommunications articles
2057:
1966:C-Class Computing articles
1733:21:52, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
1716:12:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
1693:09:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
1675:19:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
1654:19:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
1624:19:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
1596:11:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
1561:11:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
1539:05:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
1521:18:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
1506:15:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
1476:11:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
1458:11:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
1443:11:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
1419:00:49, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
1400:08:11, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
1363:05:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
1320:07:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
1274:04:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
1252:23:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
1232:14:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
1216:00:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
929:12:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
568:project's importance scale
458:project's importance scale
328:project's importance scale
141:project's importance scale
1976:C-Class software articles
1841:17:41, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
1819:12:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
1195:17:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
1173:10:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
909:15:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
855:01:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
841:18:34, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
818:07:12, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
799:07:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
742:20:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
710:14:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
584:
561:
489:
455:
404:
367:
343:
321:
262:
169:
134:
67:
46:
2031:C-Class Finland articles
1769:10:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
1345:needs, whatany they are.
1095:10:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
888:09:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
90:Telecommunication portal
2016:C-Class Brands articles
1431:1,1-1,5 million devises
585:Jolla is N9's successor
2011:All Computing articles
915:The display on the N9
364:
340:
290:information technology
200:WikiProject Technology
28:This article is rated
1991:All Software articles
870:PenTile matrix family
862:PenTile matrix family
363:
339:
277:WikiProject Computing
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1424:Sales facts of Lumia
917:is certainly pentile
636:Jolla (mobile phone)
347:WikiProject Software
520:WikiProject Finland
223:Technology articles
716:Harmattan != MeeGo
419:WikiProject Brands
365:
341:
308:Computing articles
112:Telecommunications
103:Telecommunications
59:Telecommunications
34:content assessment
1850:Market Position =
1772:
1755:comment added by
1741:"gap .. reduced"?
1402:
1386:comment added by
1264:comment added by
1242:comment added by
1197:
1185:comment added by
1163:comment added by
1142:comment added by
1116:comment added by
1070:comment added by
1048:comment added by
972:comment added by
962:disorientig photo
946:comment added by
878:comment added by
789:comment added by
771:
759:comment added by
732:comment added by
700:comment added by
595:comment added by
582:
581:
578:
577:
574:
573:
468:
467:
464:
463:
386:
385:
382:
381:
235:
234:
231:
230:
192:Technology portal
151:
150:
147:
146:
2048:
1771:
1757:Davidmaxwaterman
1749:
1665:functionality.--
1276:
1254:
1175:
1154:
1128:
1087:Davidmaxwaterman
1082:
1060:
984:
958:
890:
801:
775:It has 802.11a
744:
712:
607:
552:
545:
544:
543:Finland articles
541:
538:
535:
514:
509:
508:
507:
498:
491:
490:
485:
477:
470:
444:
443:
440:
437:
434:
413:
406:
405:
395:
388:
310:
309:
306:
303:
300:
271:
264:
263:
258:
255:
244:
237:
225:
224:
221:
218:
215:
194:
189:
188:
178:
171:
170:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2056:
2055:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2047:
2046:
2045:
1936:
1935:
1852:
1778:
1750:
1743:
1723:sounds good. --
1703:
1486:
1484:Horrible layout
1426:
1259:
1237:
1158:
1137:
1111:
1103:
1065:
1043:
1040:
1021:
967:
964:
941:
937:
880:193.127.207.152
873:
868:Is the display
866:
860:Is the display
826:
784:
727:
718:
695:
692:
673:
597:131.228.216.129
590:
587:
542:
539:
536:
533:
532:
510:
505:
503:
483:
442:Brands articles
441:
438:
435:
432:
431:
307:
304:
301:
298:
297:
256:
250:
222:
219:
216:
213:
212:
190:
183:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2054:
2052:
2044:
2043:
2038:
2033:
2028:
2023:
2018:
2013:
2008:
2003:
1998:
1993:
1988:
1983:
1978:
1973:
1968:
1963:
1958:
1953:
1948:
1938:
1937:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1906:
1905:
1851:
1848:
1846:
1844:
1843:
1829:
1825:
1785:
1784:
1777:
1774:
1742:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1702:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1678:
1677:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1524:
1523:
1485:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1461:
1460:
1425:
1422:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1307:
1299:
1295:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1255:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1187:77.254.134.147
1165:77.254.134.147
1102:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1083:
1072:77.254.134.147
1050:200.69.251.157
1039:
1036:
1020:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1005:77.254.134.147
1001:
963:
960:
936:
933:
932:
931:
912:
911:
865:
858:
825:
824:FM transmitter
822:
821:
820:
791:85.228.193.164
773:
772:
761:77.254.134.147
717:
714:
702:121.214.100.33
691:
688:
672:
669:
668:
667:
653:
652:
649:
646:
632:
628:
621:
617:
613:
612:
586:
583:
580:
579:
576:
575:
572:
571:
564:Low-importance
560:
554:
553:
546:
529:the discussion
516:
515:
512:Finland portal
499:
487:
486:
484:Low‑importance
478:
466:
465:
462:
461:
454:
448:
447:
445:
428:the discussion
414:
402:
401:
396:
384:
383:
380:
379:
376:Mid-importance
366:
356:
355:
352:Low-importance
342:
332:
331:
324:Low-importance
320:
314:
313:
311:
294:the discussion
272:
260:
259:
257:Low‑importance
245:
233:
232:
229:
228:
226:
209:the discussion
196:
195:
179:
167:
166:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Low-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2053:
2042:
2039:
2037:
2034:
2032:
2029:
2027:
2024:
2022:
2019:
2017:
2014:
2012:
2009:
2007:
2004:
2002:
1999:
1997:
1994:
1992:
1989:
1987:
1984:
1982:
1979:
1977:
1974:
1972:
1969:
1967:
1964:
1962:
1959:
1957:
1954:
1952:
1949:
1947:
1944:
1943:
1941:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1921:Martin.uecker
1918:
1914:
1913:Martin.uecker
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1895:Martin.uecker
1892:
1888:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1872:Martin.uecker
1867:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1857:Martin.uecker
1849:
1847:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1833:Martin.uecker
1830:
1826:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1797:
1792:
1789:
1783:
1780:
1779:
1773:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1746:
1740:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1725:Cameron Scott
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1700:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1685:Cameron Scott
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1663:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1637:
1634:
1631:Ok, so I was
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1553:Cameron Scott
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1494:
1490:
1483:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1450:Cameron Scott
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1423:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1411:Martin.uecker
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1293:
1289:
1288:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1256:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1244:36.37.215.224
1241:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1177:
1176:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1156:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1118:83.146.236.53
1115:
1108:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1037:
1035:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
1000:
996:
992:
987:
986:
985:
983:
979:
975:
974:178.37.122.44
971:
961:
959:
957:
953:
949:
948:70.31.123.219
945:
934:
930:
926:
922:
918:
914:
913:
910:
907:
904:
901:
897:
893:
892:
891:
889:
885:
881:
877:
871:
863:
859:
857:
856:
852:
848:
843:
842:
838:
834:
830:
823:
819:
815:
811:
808:
804:
803:
802:
800:
796:
792:
788:
783:
779:
776:
770:
766:
762:
758:
752:
747:
746:
745:
743:
739:
735:
734:72.226.61.160
731:
726:
721:
715:
713:
711:
707:
703:
699:
689:
687:
686:
682:
678:
677:88.112.67.118
670:
666:
662:
658:
655:
654:
650:
647:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
626:
622:
618:
615:
614:
610:
609:
608:
606:
602:
598:
594:
569:
565:
559:
556:
555:
551:
547:
530:
526:
522:
521:
513:
502:
500:
497:
493:
492:
488:
482:
479:
476:
472:
459:
453:
450:
449:
446:
429:
425:
421:
420:
415:
412:
408:
407:
403:
400:
397:
394:
390:
377:
374:(assessed as
373:
372:
362:
358:
357:
353:
350:(assessed as
349:
348:
338:
334:
333:
329:
325:
319:
316:
315:
312:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
273:
270:
266:
265:
261:
254:
249:
246:
243:
239:
227:
210:
206:
202:
201:
193:
187:
182:
180:
177:
173:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1868:
1853:
1845:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1795:
1793:
1790:
1786:
1781:
1751:— Preceding
1747:
1744:
1704:
1661:
1641:
1638:
1630:
1531:83.4.130.158
1495:
1491:
1487:
1427:
1407:
1382:— Preceding
1355:83.4.130.158
1302:
1291:
1266:83.4.163.191
1260:— Preceding
1238:— Preceding
1204:
1181:— Preceding
1159:— Preceding
1144:36.37.215.49
1138:— Preceding
1112:— Preceding
1104:
1066:— Preceding
1044:— Preceding
1041:
1022:
968:— Preceding
965:
942:— Preceding
938:
874:— Preceding
867:
844:
827:
785:— Preceding
780:
777:
774:
755:— Preceding
728:— Preceding
722:
719:
696:— Preceding
693:
674:
640:Jolla Tablet
591:— Preceding
588:
563:
518:
417:
369:
345:
323:
275:
198:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
1644:article. --
1301:Discussing
1206:platform!--
845:Thanks ! --
644:Sailfish OS
1940:Categories
1646:Javispedro
1616:Javispedro
1498:Javispedro
1306:producers.
921:Javispedro
919:, RGBG. --
894:sure no --
690:The Trojan
620:successor.
214:Technology
205:technology
164:Technology
1824:Hi Mardus
1642:Harmattan
1578:useful.--
1303:in length
671:Bad photo
299:Computing
286:computing
282:computers
248:Computing
1765:contribs
1753:unsigned
1396:contribs
1384:unsigned
1262:unsigned
1240:unsigned
1183:unsigned
1161:unsigned
1140:unsigned
1114:unsigned
1068:unsigned
1046:unsigned
970:unsigned
944:unsigned
876:unsigned
787:unsigned
757:unsigned
730:unsigned
698:unsigned
593:unsigned
253:Software
1887:smartmo
1708:Caygill
1667:Caygill
1662:SUGGEST
1588:Caygill
1580:Caygill
1513:Caygill
1468:Caygill
1435:Caygill
1388:Caygill
1312:Caygill
1224:Caygill
1208:Caygill
991:Animist
833:Tallyho
810:Andries
751:Meltemi
627:company
566:on the
534:Finland
525:Finland
481:Finland
326:on the
139:on the
30:C-class
1811:Mardus
1612:iPhone
1298:today?
1292:rumors
1038:Lankki
847:Mandor
657:Ocexyz
631:MeeGo.
433:Brands
424:brands
399:Brands
288:, and
36:scale.
1025:Zache
778:See:
723:See:
625:Jolla
1925:talk
1917:talk
1899:talk
1891:talk
1876:talk
1861:talk
1837:talk
1815:talk
1761:talk
1729:talk
1712:talk
1689:talk
1671:talk
1650:talk
1633:bold
1620:talk
1592:talk
1584:talk
1557:talk
1535:talk
1517:talk
1502:talk
1472:talk
1454:talk
1439:talk
1415:talk
1392:talk
1359:talk
1316:talk
1270:talk
1248:talk
1228:talk
1212:talk
1191:talk
1169:talk
1148:talk
1122:talk
1091:talk
1076:talk
1054:talk
1029:talk
1019:N950
1009:talk
995:talk
978:talk
952:talk
925:talk
906:Remy
900:Call
896:Rat2
884:talk
851:talk
837:talk
814:talk
795:talk
765:talk
738:talk
706:talk
681:talk
661:talk
601:talk
935:Eh?
872:?
558:Low
452:???
318:Low
131:Low
1942::
1927:)
1901:)
1878:)
1863:)
1839:)
1817:)
1796:If
1767:)
1763:•
1731:)
1714:)
1691:)
1673:)
1652:)
1622:)
1594:)
1559:)
1537:)
1519:)
1504:)
1474:)
1456:)
1441:)
1417:)
1398:)
1394:•
1361:)
1318:)
1310:--
1272:)
1250:)
1230:)
1214:)
1193:)
1171:)
1150:)
1124:)
1093:)
1078:)
1056:)
1031:)
1011:)
997:)
980:)
954:)
927:)
903:me
886:)
853:)
839:)
831:--
816:)
797:)
767:)
740:)
708:)
683:)
663:)
642:,
638:,
603:)
378:).
354:).
284:,
251::
1923:(
1915:(
1897:(
1889:(
1874:(
1859:(
1835:(
1813:(
1759:(
1727:(
1710:(
1687:(
1669:(
1648:(
1618:(
1590:(
1582:(
1555:(
1533:(
1515:(
1500:(
1470:(
1452:(
1437:(
1413:(
1390:(
1357:(
1314:(
1268:(
1246:(
1226:(
1210:(
1189:(
1167:(
1146:(
1120:(
1089:(
1074:(
1052:(
1027:(
1007:(
993:(
976:(
950:(
923:(
898:.
882:(
864:?
849:(
835:(
812:(
793:(
763:(
736:(
704:(
679:(
659:(
599:(
570:.
460:.
330:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.