Talk:Norodom Chakrapong/GA1

1154:

president by Prince Ranariddh this year,....". But it is necessary to quote ref#25 as well since it reflects his senate seat based in Prey Veng. #Ref 26 (dated 10 Mar 2006) reflects states that Chakrapong has been appointed to the post in the sentence, "Prince Chakrapong, who was also named Senate first deputy president by Prince Ranariddh this year,...", and also elaborates Chakrapong's nomination for FUNCINPEC's sec-gen and dissent with the party at length, shown in sentences such as "Voicing unprecedented dissent, senior Funcinpec officials spoke out in criticism of their embattled party leader Prince Norodom Ranariddh ...." I hope that the rearrangement with the rationale stated above may have adequately addressed the issue?

1903:

to an " implied point". Lets say that in "Source X", it supports two facts expicitly and implied one. You input the 3 points in one sentence. As a rule of thumb, yes--another source would be needed to back up the implied point. But again, what is the line between an "explicit" and "implied" point? There seems to be no clear boundary on this, some have stricter interpretations than others. You see two Muslim ladies for example; one wears a Hijab (headscarf) and the other does not. ....the one who wears the Hijab is pious Muslim but can you say that the other lady is not a "pious" Muslim since she does not wear the Hijab? She does not eat pork, prays five times a day and so on.....

1807:" Which are the additional citations that have issues in this article??? Please, if you present to me that let's say there are 20 citations that have issues, missed out 3 or 4 of them and tell me the next round that the 3 or 4 of them needs to be addressed that you have missed out, I can understand. But this is not what had happened. You could have come back to raise the additional citations on 25 March, given your edit history online wikipedia but you chose to sidetrack on other areas. It disappoints me even further, that you have been holding onto 2190:. Do you not understand how time-consuming that is? If I did it in one go, it'd take a couple of hours. If you'd simply done what I'd asked and double-checked yourself (which you don't seem to be willing to do), then I could probably zip through the article and simply pass it. You've made the job far more work than it should be. Another GA I took on at the same time passed days ago because there were hardly any sourcing issues. 1081:"Over at the Royal Palace, Sihanouk was told his sons had patched up, and he pardoned his capricious child in 1998. It was a happy reunion, but would Chakrapong's sensible phase last? With the same stroke of the pen, Sihanouk pardoned his half-brother Sirivudh, in exile on charges of allegedly plotting to murder Hun Sen. The royal decree paved the way for both princes to return home after strongman 273:." If I am not mistaken, guidelines advised us that redlinking once would be more than enough. As for Sisowath Pongsanmoni, I have little information about her beyond that she is one of many Sihanouk's wives. Unless an article is created, I do not see the point of doing so, and my take is that I would not create a stub page to simply state that she is Sihanouk's wife....that may not conform to 1932:- some of them have limited previews, or if you want I can provide a phrase. I also admit I might have made some genuine mistakes - it was indeed a learning journey as I wrote this article - I often had to read an average of 3, 4 articles to fully understand one point before penning it down. And that's where interpretation lapses may come up, especially in aspects of governance. 45: 641: 636: 626: 547:"There are reasons Chakrapong is not qualified for the post,” Nhiek Bun Chhay said. “Firstly, in 1992, he led Sihanoukists to join the Cambodian People’s Party. Secondly, he led a secessionist movement to oppose the Funcinpec victory in the 1993 election. And thirdly, he set up his own party, , insulting and attacking Funcinpec." 1006:

were no additional available references that I could find on this act by Chakrapong, it would be very hard to elaborate or explain since there is a missing gap in follow-up events. Hence, I felt it would be better to remove and replace it with another point that is more straightforward and less subjective to interpretation .....

845:

Party (CPP) in early 1992. The sudden flight of the former Royal Cambodian Air Force fighter pilot Chakrapong to the rival camp was, ....", but I do not see as many details that this source can offer as compared to the interview. I felt that the interview was a good read and offered good insights as I was writing this article.

1928:. But if you feel that a certain point still needs to be cited, by all means sound the bell and I will be glad to input it or remove it if otherwise. If I see any issues I will edit them but I definitely can't spot every other mistake or lapse. If you want to check the source of the books, I would suggest either you go to 1376:. If that's the case, then technically the entire article will need a citation for every phrase or half a sentence. I agree that in some cases, multiple citations in one sentence maybe needed especially if the facts are taken from two or more different sources but this is simply not the case. This doesn't sound right. 841:

lost or possibly misconstrued. Anyway, this interview only cited two points in the whole article, and as a whole my take is that using a mixture of sources from books written by biographers and political scientists, newspaper reports and interviews is the way to write something that is "balanced" in content as a whole.

1790:

think that's very professional. I see your contribution history that you are able to visit wikipedia on a daily basis from at least March 17, work on other fields, and not raising any issues on 18, 19, 21, 22 March - you were able to come back and make edits on other areas but there was no activity in this GAN.

903:. I agree that what I input was a degree of editorial interpretation, and thought it would be useful to provide some joining content. If you have any alternative, more relevant interpretations, I would be glad to accept the new suggestion, but if you cannot agree then you may just remove it altogether. 1953:

If you feel that let's say for example, for Norodom Ranariddh's GAN you can't commit for an extended period of time due to real life issues, I would suggest you withdraw yourself as a reviewer and let other fellow colleagues do it. But you have put up your name in the Review Page, and definitely when

1893:

I had done copyediting after submitting for GAN. I have to apologise - no humans are born perfect and we invariably miss the mark sometimes. Perhaps, you might have a very strict interpretation of the policies and guidelines - well, if you have a point to make I will address it somehow since I am the

1902:

to say that all points stated need to be cited and back up. But as you can see, different sources will provide different depths of content coverage. For less important content pertaining to the topic, sometimes editors may summarise the point, and in doing so, details get lost and kinds of relegated

1371:

Assume that you get all 4 sources from one source. Don't you tell me that you are going to insert every sentence with the same identical footnote?? My understanding is that just one citation at the end of the paragraph will do, provided that all 4 sentences are obtained from the same footnote unless

1230:

No, I reverse my stance on this. I believe that unless there is a break in the sentence (Eg: Sentence 1 quotes from Source A, Sentence 2 from Source B and Sentence 3 from Source A, all 3 should have a footnote because of a break in Sentence 2. If all 3 sentences comes from Source A then one footnote

1005:

I basically replaced it with another point/fact, if you look at the last sentence of the para. I don't see any additional sources that followed up on Chakrapong's call to lower the Angkor Wat fees - whether this act was actually implemented after the cabinet meeting as stated in the source. As there

976:

Granted, I admit it is a little difficult to elaborate since this is the only source available on Chakrapong's involvement with the Angkor Wat administration, and have since replaced it with another point. But my take is that it would be very sad if nothing is elaborated on Chakrapong's achievements

614:

I felt it should be placed in the Business career section for purely technical reasons. As you can see, the infobox is very long, and given that the Family section is right next to the reference section, it will trail into the Reference section. I do not want the infobox to create a white dead space

1789:

I'm not saying that raising new points from your side is wrong. I appreciate the attention that you give, but I find it hard to accept to be told (or implied) that there are only one set of issues at the beginning and then coming to say that there is an additional chunk yet to be addressed, I don't

840:

Why don't you think so? :) My take is that an interview source from the subject himself is definitely beneficial, as the subject knows his life history best. I do not condemn second-hand sources written by other biographers, but sometimes when they summarise life events or rephrase, details can get

1958:

but there was no progress. If you are away from Knowledge like I sometimes do, I can emphatise and forgive. I do not ask you to commit anymore real-life time to wikipedia than you can deliver. But you sidetracked your efforts to other topics in Knowledge, within whatever time that you dedicated to

1847:

time-consuming. I just haven't had the time to sit down and do it in one go—it's incremental or nothing. It would be a lot easier and faster if you had taken my earlier advice, after I had worked through the first column: that you go through the sources yourself and make sure they're saying what

1565:

I've checked the first column of citations in the first column (the ones I could access, anyways). I don't see any plagiarism or close paraphrasing issues, but the sources don't always support the details in the text. I think it would be a good idea to go through your sources again—it may be the

2123:

You misconstrued my comments too far. I made a suggestion, and there is no compulsion for you to follow through so strictly. What I see is that you are able to log onto Knowledge everyday, but you cannot dedicate a portion of the time everyday on an incremental basis to improvements? To be honest

1038:

There is a 4th book (Benny Widyono-Dancing In Shadows) that actually states this point, but it would be a "waste" to cite that just one point. Anyway, I made a slight modification to comply with existing sources. "Mehta (2013) , p. 244": "A truckload of rebels was seen moving into Phnom Penh, but

890:

In the article, Chakrapong never quoted the prospect of a coup per se but the following phrase does provide a strong hint: "The concept of sharing power with enemies is alien to the former communists in the CPP leadership and to modern Cambodian political culture. Asian diplomats said Chakrapong,

2380:

The sourcing is inadequate, especially for a BLP, as I've already stated. It's your job now to fix the issues---which includes proactively working through all the sources to ensure text-source integrity---and then you're free to renominate. You should also be careful about accusing people of bad

1838:

Sorry, but you have to understand—I feel that I've had to go through every source quite thoroughly as I keep finding sourcing issues. This is quite time-consuming and wearying. The other edits I've made have been between other tasks like washing the dishes and bathing the kids—when I have five

844:

But if you strongly feel that the interview should not be used, I can offer a close alternative citation in the form of "Mehta (2001), p. 149", phrase: "Following irreconcilable differences with Ranariddh, Chakrapong defected from his father's Funcinpec party to join Hun Sen's Cambodian People's

1811:

but I still see Ranariddh's GAN empty. I hope you can start providing inputs on issues that needs to be addressed, raise points over consecutive days if one day is simply not enough. I have seen your good work and believe that you can do more to help. You seem to be very attentive on a periodic

1771:

Please, I urge you to go through all the sources in one go, or incrementally within consecutive days if one day is not enough. I believe that going through about 25-30 citations in the article is not too great a challenge, but when I cross-examined this talk page history and your contributions

2182:—no, the problem is not that I don't have the time, the problem is that there are so many issues with the sourcing of the article that it's taking an unusually long amount of time. I read a statement, and then I check the source to see if it's there. If I see it right away, I move on. If I 1954:

other GA reviewers look through it they would have the impression that it is under review but the point is nothing has been done as yet. The problem that I see now is that you feel there is a lot of work to be done but you can't meet the time. I don't think that is very right because you have

1153:

OK, made a little shift in ref#25 forward, since ref#25 stated Ranariddh's plans for Chakrapong's appointment and ref#26 shows that Chakrapong had been actually appointed Senate vice (or deputy) president, with the following phrase: "Prince Chakrapong, who was also named Senate first deputy

1988:

as your number one priority. Say for example, there are 100 sources that you want to check or something like that, and you can finish 20 or so per day. Do 20 source check on Day 1, next 20 on Day 2 and the third 20 on Day 3. The number is just an example. Can that be done? Let me know....

1776:" And then, we discussed on fine tuning the 6 citations that you felt required additional attention. On 24 March, you made another statement that there are even more citations that requires additional attention, which to my impression is a deviation from the statement you made on 17 March. 2063:

I'd hardly call the walls of text you've thrown at me "civil"—nor is asking for another reviewer after you've worn the current one out. If you're unsatisfied with the amount of time this review is taking you should consider double-checking your sources before submitting.

1738:

Ref#35: "as foreign tourists opted for land transport options to provincial capitals which were cheaper than air transport" isn't supported by the source—the source speculates: "perhaps due to easier overland travel". I'd just cut this, as it's not really important

1855:

Having said that, this all raises issues about the sourcing that I can't access: how much confidence can I have that what you've sourced to Mehta and Narong are faithful to the sources? After I asked you to check the sources, you made no changes that suggested you

329:....He then lived in the former Yugoslavia, as the guest of the late President Joseph Broz Tito, and undertook further training with the Yugoslavian Air Force Staff College. At the end of this training, he requested political asylum in France where he became a 2258:

Can I ask what are your expectations of this article? Furthermore, I have been actively engaging in making corrections to the feedback that you have made. Whatever points that you have raised in the past I have addressed all, and you seem to be satisfied with

792:

sign to all the page numbers? Wouldn't a basic spacing such as eg: "p. 7" or "pp. 21-22" would be sufficient without all the HTML? I do not see any technical differences without the HTML, and might make editing for other editors not too convenient......

340:

I tried to cross check other resources, but there is no elaboration on what kind of enterprise that he was dealing with. If there is more source information I will be glad to input, but the furthest that we can infer that he is probably an owner of a

1621:

Ref#28: It says Ranariddh was accused of "attempting to create a rift inside the floundering royalist party", and it says he was accused of trying to form a new party, but it doesn't say the new party was "royalist" (or am I missing

1772:

history (sorry for privacy intrusion), you did not come back to work on this GAN or Ranariddh's GAN in spite that you were able to commit to Knowledge on a daily basis since 17 March at least. You left the comment on 17 March that "

859:

Well, the subject himself is likely to be biased in his own favour—you've used the interview only for strict facts, which is okay, but a third-party source gives reviewers more confidence. The interview's fine as you've used it.

807:

I keeps the "p." and the number together—it prevents them from pbreaking apart if they happen to come at the end of a line. If you don't like it, feel free to revert it—I don't believe there's a guideline that mandates them.

749:. Any images used should be appropriate to the article, have captions and free licenses or valid fair use rationales."? I hope that this would not be an obstacle to GA criteria. I found some non-free images online such as 291:

You're right, the guidleines say to link once (and I missed that it was in the lead). The lead is a summary of the body, though, and so normally we also link (or redlink) again at the first instance in the body, too.

1959:

wikipedia, and that upsets me as you found issues here but never provide sufficient attention. And coming back to Chakrapong, you have reached point #Ref 35 and if you would like to, you can go through the rest.

2316:

checked, I have no confidence that the paper sources were used any more scrupulously. BLPs are held to a higher standard of sourcing than other kinds of articles—even when not GAs—for reasons stated at WP:BLP.

2311:

changes have been made except at my direct prompting, and no changes have been made with regards to sources I have been unable to access. Given that there have been issues with over half of the sources I

2124:

participating in a review, or even making any edits is a matter of heart and passion and not a "chore". Indeed, if you feel that it is a chore you should really excuse yourself from the review altogether.

1566:

result of moving text around (away from its original inline cites) or something like that. I'll give you some time to fix these issues. When you're done, ping me and I'll come back to finish the review.

2358:

Look, which are the paper sources that you want to check? I have stated that I am willing to provide the phrases upon request. Furthermore, the three books stated are viewable via Google Books as I have

1860:

checked the sources—then when I started on the second column, I found issue after issue. My confidence in the quality of sourcing is low enough that I've been considering failing the article over it.

1812:

basis, but not at other periods. I urge you to commit your time and effort fully to address all necessary issues in one go, rather than make promises but not taking sufficient action to address them.

1894:

main writer of this article. For example, on the point that Ranariddh sought exile in Malaysia in March 2007, perhaps I have missed the mark in citation as I thought that this fact was stated in the

752:. I plan to contact various authors to see if they can release images of Chakrapong, Ranariddh, emblems of political logos etc under Creative Commons or GFDL in future during my holiday season. 1176:

citation. Doubling citations is fine (using the same citation twice, or having two or more citations for a piece of text). You don't have to rewrite the text to acommodate the citations.

1039:

they were quickly disarmed before they could put their plan into action. Within minutes it was all over. It was believed that Chakrapong had launched the coup plot after the CPP...."

1925: 1585:

Appreciated with thanks and hope that the issues are sufficiently addressed or rectified. Please do not hesitate to revert back to me if there are additional outstanding issues.

550:

But I do not think it would be appropriate to go into detail in the context of this article, otherwise it would amount to overelaboration. Anyway, I have re-phrased a little...

195:, you seems to have started the wrong GA review page? Please cut and paste if necessary....but if you are keen on doing a review of Norodom Ranariddh, it will be my pleasure :) 2262:

Please, I urge you to cool down and let's finish this review at the very least. I can't stop you from a quick fail if you insist, but I don't think this is quite in line with

1113:

You need to examine Ref #25 and Ref #26 together to get the picture. #25 stated the planned appointment, and in #26, it was stated that Chakrapong was appointed to the post.

50: 1231:

at the end of Sentence 3 would be sufficient. Provided that all 3 sentences are in one paragraph You maybe right to some extent here but it appears that this is making a

967:"As the minister in charge of overseeing tourism affairs, Chakrapong led a government working committee to review policies and strategies of the tourism department." 2003:

Holy Christ—look, I'm simply not going to waste my time reading through another wall of text like this. If you have a point to make, find a better way to make it.

83: 2331:

For the next nomination, I suggest the nominator go through the sources again—including the offline ones—and demonstrate that every effort has been made to ensure

917:

Well, this is the thing—we're not suppose to "interpret" the sources. I think it would be best to remove it, or to report strictly what the sources have said.

2307:—one about a controversial politician—and there have been far too many issues with the sources. Despite calls for the nominator to double-check the sources, 73: 575:

Councilor seats, its just like in a national parliament, there will be a certain given number of given of seats. If I understand correctly for example, the

129: 833:

Ref#4: You seem to have used the source appropriately, but an interview is not the best of sources—are there any other sources that give this information?

544:, these 2 party members were unhappy with his appointment to the sec-gen post of the party. From the source, Nhek Bun Chhay gives the following reasons: 2230:

There's only a couple more sources to review if you feel you can commit to it. Anyway, I am double checking on my side as well as you have requested.

1253:

it's not okay to have a sentence end with a citation, then begin another sentence, and have a citation for the next sentence where information in the

125: 55: 2049:. If you are unhappy with reviewing these two articles then please withdraw yourself from the process and I will find another reviewer to do it. 1713:

Ref#34: The dates (August 2001 and June 2002) don't appear in the source. Also, I see nothing about "Chakrapong was accused of political bias"

110: 2335:. This is especially important in a Biography of a Living Person, and even more so when that person is involved in politics and controversy. 1072:

Apologies, I made a slight editorial mistake, amended. Anyway for your benefit, this is the full quote from the source "Mehta (2001), p. 161":

500:

In May 2005, a new position of Inspector General was introduced to the party's executive committee, and Chakrapong was appointed to the post.

895:."" If you check the date, it was written in June 1993. He was most probably pointing to the coup that happened in Burma back in 1990 when 2186:

see it right away, then I have to spend time combing through the source to find what's supposed to be there—and surprisingly often it's

766:

I know they're not required, but I'm surprised that there aren't any—sorry, I wasn't implying that the article would fail without them.

481:

Done. Basically Chakrapong dissolved his splinter party, known as the "Khmer Soul Party", and returned to join FUNCINPEC in March 2004.

102: 342: 159: 2263: 742: 333:. After the formation of FUNCINPEC, Samdech Preah joined the party and established himself at the Thai Cambodian border in charge... 248:

I've done some copyedits. Feel free to revert anything you disagree with, and feel free to disagree with any feedback I have below:

1663:, but not specifically embezzlement (if the embezzlement charge is from another source, you'll have to duplicate that source here). 1438:

that supports your argument, with the exact section to specify that. Otherwise I urge you to revert the double citation in #Ref26.

469: 601: 78: 900: 425:

Yes, but would it sound a little awkward given this way: "Thayer had initially attempted to contact United States Ambassador

1984:

Let just do things this way....finish whatever other Knowledge editing projects you have, and after that, make this GAN and

891:

during a visit to Beijing in May, responded to a diplomat who asked him what the CPP reaction to losing the elections as: "

542: 1605:

Sorry that I've been taking my time. I'm going to go through the other column of references, probably sometime today.

2363: 1852:

job so much more work, as I have to stop with virtually every source to note where the text and source don't match up.

1373: 1232: 882:"In May 1991, Chakrapong hinted that the Cambodian People's Party (CPP) could rebel if they were to lose an election." 1808: 2046: 209:

Whoops! How did I do that? Sorry, give me until tomorrow and I'll sort this out—maybe I'll end up doing both.

1065:. It doesn't mention the PM, and if an amnesty is the same as a pardon, then it was granted in 1998, not 1999. 694:

Please do not hesitate to revert to me if you feel that there are outstanding issues to be addressed. Thanks!

2244:

I'm honestly considering simply failing it. The sourcing issues are far beyond what I would have expected.

2180:"The problem that I see now is that you feel there is a lot of work to be done but you can't meet the time." 322:

The source from "Narong (2005), p. 208" on this period of Chakrapong's life that I referenced merely stated:

118: 17: 723:

Oh—the article has no images. Is there nothing appropriate? Even a photo of the building he was born in?

2385: 2339: 2321: 2248: 2194: 2068: 2007: 1864: 1746: 1609: 1570: 1456: 1265: 1180: 1131: 995: 921: 864: 812: 770: 727: 713: 682: 451: 363: 296: 227: 213: 173: 153: 433:, but was unsuccessful." ...The US is repeated twice in one sentence? But anyway I am fine to go along 991:

It appears you've taken out mention of Angkor Watt, and have removed the source that was there ... ?

652:, Racvivong and Khemanourak) and four younger sisters (Sorya Roeungsi, Kantha Bopha and Botum Bopha). 576: 274: 2332: 383: 631:

But if I place the infobox to "Palace relations", note the dead space in the "Reference" section:

1127:

If the info's in ref#26, then you'll have to repeat that ref for the statement it's referencing.

192: 95: 2045:

Please, that's not very polite of you. I am trying to reason out things with you but that's not

899:

won an election but was denied power and subsequently the military took power. You may refer to

2382: 2336: 2318: 2245: 2191: 2065: 2004: 1895: 1861: 1743: 1606: 1567: 1453: 1262: 1216:

Fixed. Anymore outstanding arrears? I believe it should be ready to be passed if otherwise...

1177: 1128: 992: 918: 861: 809: 767: 745:, there is a clause that states, "The article should comply with image use policy. Images are 724: 710: 679: 649: 448: 360: 293: 255: 224: 210: 184: 170: 149: 2371: 2271: 2235: 2129: 2054: 1994: 1840: 1817: 1725: 1700: 1688:

Ref#31: I don't see where teh source says "Ranariddh sought exile in Malaysia in March 2007"

1675: 1634: 1590: 1525: 1443: 1381: 1240: 1221: 1159: 1118: 1090: 1044: 1011: 982: 948: 908: 896: 850: 798: 757: 699: 666: 584: 555: 514: 486: 438: 398: 350: 282: 270: 266: 200: 426: 413: 529: 1372:

there is a break in sentence 2 or 3 from another source. I suggest you take a look at

750: 2304: 1249:

It's fine to cite multiple sentences—even entire paragraphs—to a single citation.

2390: 2375: 2344: 2326: 2275: 2253: 2239: 2199: 2133: 2073: 2058: 2012: 1998: 1869: 1821: 1751: 1729: 1704: 1679: 1638: 1614: 1594: 1575: 1529: 1461: 1447: 1385: 1270: 1244: 1225: 1185: 1163: 1136: 1122: 1094: 1048: 1015: 1000: 986: 952: 926: 912: 869: 854: 817: 802: 775: 761: 732: 718: 703: 687: 670: 588: 559: 518: 490: 456: 442: 402: 368: 354: 301: 286: 232: 218: 204: 178: 163: 1059:"In 1999, the King granted him a pardon with Prime Minister Hun Sen's agreement." 265:

I have redlinked Sihanouk in the lead sentence already: "He is the fourth son of

2367: 2267: 2231: 2125: 2050: 1990: 1839:

minutes to sit down, it's relatively easy to sit down and copyedit a section of

1813: 1805:

I'm going to go through the other column of references, probably sometime today.

1721: 1696: 1671: 1630: 1586: 1521: 1439: 1377: 1236: 1217: 1155: 1114: 1086: 1040: 1007: 978: 944: 904: 846: 794: 753: 695: 662: 580: 551: 533: 510: 482: 434: 394: 346: 278: 196: 2362:

I urge that you withdraw the "Fail" declaration. You are obviously starting to

1063:"He received amnesty from King Norodom Sihanouk in 1998 and returned in 1999." 1520:

Then this is a non-issue already. I"ll remove the double citation in #26.

640: 615:

due to the trail. Perhaps I might want to illustrate this via screenshots:

1803:

You stated that there were more issues to be addressed and stated that, "

635: 625: 1926:

Knowledge:You_don't_need_to_cite_that_the_sky_is_blue#Citing_everything

1082: 1452:

You've completely misunderstood what I wrote. Please read it again.

1924:

Still, to avoid cluttering overcitations I took it in the spirit of

412:

Thayer had initially attempted to contact United States Ambassador

2366:

and not being rational. I will get a second opinion if otherwise.

258:? Sihanouk in particular, as the text says he was Prime Minister. 648:

Chakrapong has six full siblings, consisting of three brothers (

566:

to secure 472 out of 11,459 commune councilor positions available

1848:

the text is saying. You clearly haven't done that, which makes

502:: Was Chakropong appointed the same month the post was created? 223:

Okay, I've moved this review here. Sorry about the confusion!

1655:) president, but doesn't seem to say anything about him being 359:

That's unfortuante, but I suppose there's nothing you can do.

1261:

citation. This is not citation overkill—it's a requirement.

474:: should that be "he returned", or is something missing here? 977:

as DPM since this is a high office position of the country.

1317:

I give you an example with the sample, fictional paragraph:

1168:

The point is that the inline citations cite whatever comes

468:

After the Khmer Soul Party failed to win any seats in the

943:

Ok, agree to you to some extent and edited out the part.

528:

but was criticised by other senior party members such as

1436:

please highlight to me the wikipedia policy or guideline

191:

From your comments on the prose and the page history of

1659:

president. Also, the article mentions he was sued for

137: 106: 1843:, but checking sources against text is more demanding 1105:"was appointed the first vice-president of the senate" 1030:"prompting Sin Song to recall his troops to Prey Veng" 1774:....ping me and I'll come back to finish the review. 382:: worth a redlink? There's an article for the 1973 269:

of Cambodia and a half-brother of the current king,

1742:I have to go now, but I hope to finish this today. 741:No free images at the moment, but I thought as per 1720:Done and amended. Second sentence was a mistake. 1103:Ref#25: I don't see in the source where you get: 1057:Ref#23: I don't see in the source where you get: 1028:Ref#19: I don't see in the source where you get: 965:Ref#14: I don't see in the source where you get: 880:Ref#11: I don't see in the source where you get: 579:has 308 MP seats. The same concept applies here 1374:Knowledge:Citation_overkill#Needless_repetition 1344:Sentence 1. Sentence 2. Sentence 3. Sentence 4. 1898:article, which was cited over there. You are 8: 1986:Ranariddh's GAN (if you would like to do so) 1172:it—you can't say the information is in the 568:: what does "councilor position" mean here? 969:—it only talks about the Angkor Wat stuff. 472:, and returned to Funcinpec in March 2004. 33: 1434:If you state that this is a requirement, 1961:The finishing line is definitely not far 64: 36: 654:: three plus four is seven, is it not? 447:I've tried to reword it, but, hmmm... 187:, please see appended comments below: 1629:Accepted. I"ll just remove the word. 788:I'm just curious, why did you add an 315:: do we know what kind of enterprise? 7: 252:to Sihanouk and Sisowath Pongsanmoni 709:Okay, I'll do a source check soon. 418:: does "the country" mean "the US"? 254:: would either of these be worth a 343:Small and medium-sized enterprises 24: 2264:Knowledge:Reviewing good articles 743:Knowledge:Reviewing_good_articles 607:in the "Business career" section? 639: 634: 624: 1647:Ref#30: The source said he was 901:Burmese general election, 1990 1: 621:Default in business section: 416:to seek asylum in the country 1233:Knowledge:Citation overkill 747:encouraged but not required 2413: 2391:19:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2376:11:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2345:11:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2327:11:43, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2276:11:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2254:11:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2240:11:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2200:11:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2134:16:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2074:11:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2059:11:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 2013:11:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1999:10:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1870:08:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1822:08:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1752:22:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 1730:07:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1705:06:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1680:06:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1639:03:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1615:21:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 1595:13:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 1576:23:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 1530:08:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1462:08:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1448:07:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1386:07:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1271:04:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1245:03:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 1226:18:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 1186:04:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 1164:12:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 1137:21:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 1123:13:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 1095:12:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 1049:13:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 1016:12:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 1001:21:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 987:12:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 953:12:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 927:21:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 913:12:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 870:21:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 855:12:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 818:21:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 803:12:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 776:21:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 762:12:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 733:22:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 719:22:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 704:08:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 688:06:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC) 671:08:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 661:Oops, math error amended. 589:08:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 560:08:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 519:07:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 491:07:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 457:22:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 443:07:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 403:07:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 369:22:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 355:07:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 302:22:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 287:07:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 233:22:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 219:08:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 205:07:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 179:06:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC) 169:Hi. I'll do this review. 164:22:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 1257:sentence is cited in the 537:: criticized in what way? 380:1991 Paris Peace Accords 1695:Done and added source. 1670:Done and added source. 18:Talk:Norodom Chakrapong 1956:stated your commitment 1346: 602:Cambodian Royal Family 470:2003 general elections 429:to seek asylum in the 335: 313:ran a small enterprise 2333:text–source integrity 1342: 327: 577:Parliament of Canada 1085:gave it his nod. " 384:Paris Peace Accords 1170:immediately before 193:Norodom Chakrapong 1900:technically right 1896:Norodom Ranariddh 1061:The source says: 331:small businessman 92: 91: 2404: 2364:assume bad faith 2188:not there at all 2178:I noticed this: 1841:Nanking Massacre 897:Aung San Suu Kyi 643: 638: 628: 606: 600: 541:From the source 271:Norodom Sihamoni 267:Norodom Sihanouk 142: 133: 114: 46:Copyvio detector 34: 2412: 2411: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2047:civil behaviour 1809:Ranariddh's GAN 830: 604: 598: 427:Charles Twining 414:Charles Twining 245: 123: 100: 94: 88: 60: 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2410: 2408: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2360: 2350: 2348: 2347: 2329: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2260: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2164: 2161: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2097: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1881: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1853: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1763: 1760: 1757: 1755: 1754: 1740: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1665: 1664: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1624: 1623: 1618: 1617: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1228: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1108: 1107: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1067: 1066: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1033: 1032: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 971: 970: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 893:Remember Burma 885: 884: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 842: 835: 834: 829: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 736: 735: 721: 693: 691: 690: 676: 675: 674: 673: 656: 655: 619: 618: 617: 616: 609: 608: 594: 593: 592: 591: 570: 569: 539: 538: 530:Nhek Bun Chhay 524: 523: 522: 521: 504: 503: 496: 495: 494: 493: 476: 475: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 420: 419: 408: 407: 406: 405: 388: 387: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 326: 325: 324: 323: 317: 316: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 277:guidelines... 260: 259: 249: 244: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 168: 143: 90: 89: 87: 86: 81: 76: 70: 67: 66: 62: 61: 59: 58: 56:External links 53: 48: 42: 39: 38: 31: 28: 26: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2409: 2392: 2389: 2388: 2384: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2346: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2328: 2325: 2324: 2320: 2315: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2299: 2298: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2252: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2201: 2198: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2162: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2014: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1987: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1962: 1957: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1901: 1897: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1871: 1868: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1854: 1851: 1846: 1842: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1775: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1753: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1603: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1463: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1345: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1229: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1187: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1055: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1004: 1003: 1002: 999: 998: 994: 990: 989: 988: 984: 980: 975: 974: 973: 972: 968: 964: 963: 954: 950: 946: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 928: 925: 924: 920: 916: 915: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 889: 888: 887: 886: 883: 879: 878: 871: 868: 867: 863: 858: 857: 856: 852: 848: 843: 839: 838: 837: 836: 832: 831: 827: 819: 816: 815: 811: 806: 805: 804: 800: 796: 791: 787: 786: 785: 784: 777: 774: 773: 769: 765: 764: 763: 759: 755: 751: 748: 744: 740: 739: 738: 737: 734: 731: 730: 726: 722: 720: 717: 716: 712: 708: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 689: 686: 685: 681: 678: 677: 672: 668: 664: 660: 659: 658: 657: 653: 651: 646: 645: 644: 642: 637: 632: 629: 627: 622: 613: 612: 611: 610: 603: 596: 595: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 573: 572: 571: 567: 564: 563: 562: 561: 557: 553: 548: 545: 543: 536: 535: 531: 526: 525: 520: 516: 512: 508: 507: 506: 505: 501: 498: 497: 492: 488: 484: 480: 479: 478: 477: 473: 471: 466: 465: 458: 455: 454: 450: 446: 445: 444: 440: 436: 432: 431:United States 428: 424: 423: 422: 421: 417: 415: 410: 409: 404: 400: 396: 392: 391: 390: 389: 385: 381: 378: 377: 370: 367: 366: 362: 358: 357: 356: 352: 348: 344: 339: 338: 337: 336: 334: 332: 321: 320: 319: 318: 314: 311: 310: 303: 300: 299: 295: 290: 289: 288: 284: 280: 276: 275:WP:Notability 272: 268: 264: 263: 262: 261: 257: 253: 250: 247: 246: 242: 234: 231: 230: 226: 222: 221: 220: 217: 216: 212: 208: 207: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189: 188: 186: 181: 180: 177: 176: 172: 166: 165: 161: 158: 155: 151: 148: 144: 141: 140: 136: 131: 127: 122: 121: 117: 112: 108: 104: 99: 98: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 71: 69: 68: 63: 57: 54: 52: 49: 47: 44: 43: 41: 40: 35: 29: 27: 19: 2386: 2383:Curly Turkey 2349: 2340: 2337:Curly Turkey 2322: 2319:Curly Turkey 2313: 2308: 2300: 2249: 2246:Curly Turkey 2195: 2192:Curly Turkey 2187: 2183: 2179: 2163: 2160: 2096: 2069: 2066:Curly Turkey 2008: 2005:Curly Turkey 1985: 1960: 1955: 1930:Google Books 1929: 1899: 1880: 1865: 1862:Curly Turkey 1857: 1849: 1844: 1804: 1773: 1762: 1759: 1756: 1747: 1744:Curly Turkey 1660: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1610: 1607:Curly Turkey 1571: 1568:Curly Turkey 1564: 1457: 1454:Curly Turkey 1435: 1343: 1266: 1263:Curly Turkey 1258: 1254: 1250: 1181: 1178:Curly Turkey 1173: 1169: 1132: 1129:Curly Turkey 1104: 1062: 1058: 1029: 996: 993:Curly Turkey 966: 922: 919:Curly Turkey 892: 881: 865: 862:Curly Turkey 813: 810:Curly Turkey 789: 771: 768:Curly Turkey 746: 728: 725:Curly Turkey 714: 711:Curly Turkey 692: 683: 680:Curly Turkey 647: 633: 630: 623: 620: 565: 549: 546: 540: 527: 499: 467: 452: 449:Curly Turkey 430: 411: 379: 364: 361:Curly Turkey 330: 328: 312: 297: 294:Curly Turkey 251: 228: 225:Curly Turkey 214: 211:Curly Turkey 185:Curly Turkey 182: 174: 171:Curly Turkey 167: 156: 150:Curly Turkey 146: 145: 138: 134: 120:Article talk 119: 115: 96: 93: 84:Instructions 25: 2303:—this is a 1622:something?) 790:"&nbsp" 534:Lu Laysreng 107:visual edit 1661:corruption 509:Addressed 51:Authorship 37:GA toolbox 650:Yuvaneath 147:Reviewer: 74:Templates 65:Reviewing 30:GA Review 2387:¡gobble! 2341:¡gobble! 2323:¡gobble! 2250:¡gobble! 2196:¡gobble! 2070:¡gobble! 2009:¡gobble! 1866:¡gobble! 1748:¡gobble! 1739:anyways. 1611:¡gobble! 1572:¡gobble! 1458:¡gobble! 1267:¡gobble! 1182:¡gobble! 1133:¡gobble! 997:¡gobble! 923:¡gobble! 866:¡gobble! 814:¡gobble! 772:¡gobble! 729:¡gobble! 715:¡gobble! 684:¡gobble! 453:¡gobble! 365:¡gobble! 298:¡gobble! 229:¡gobble! 215:¡gobble! 175:¡gobble! 160:contribs 79:Criteria 2381:faith. 2359:stated. 1653:interim 1651:(as in 1083:Hun Sen 828:Sources 597:Why is 256:redlink 130:history 111:history 97:Article 2368:Mr Tan 2268:Mr Tan 2232:Mr Tan 2126:Mr Tan 2051:Mr Tan 1991:Mr Tan 1814:Mr Tan 1722:Mr Tan 1697:Mr Tan 1672:Mr Tan 1649:acting 1631:Mr Tan 1587:Mr Tan 1522:Mr Tan 1440:Mr Tan 1378:Mr Tan 1259:second 1237:Mr Tan 1218:Mr Tan 1156:Mr Tan 1115:Mr Tan 1087:Mr Tan 1041:Mr Tan 1008:Mr Tan 979:Mr Tan 945:Mr Tan 905:Mr Tan 847:Mr Tan 795:Mr Tan 754:Mr Tan 696:Mr Tan 663:Mr Tan 581:Mr Tan 552:Mr Tan 511:Mr Tan 483:Mr Tan 435:Mr Tan 395:Mr Tan 347:Mr Tan 279:Mr Tan 197:Mr Tan 2259:them. 2184:don't 1255:first 243:Prose 139:Watch 16:< 2372:talk 2314:have 2301:Fail 2272:talk 2236:talk 2130:talk 2055:talk 1995:talk 1818:talk 1726:talk 1701:talk 1676:talk 1657:vice 1635:talk 1591:talk 1526:talk 1444:talk 1382:talk 1241:talk 1222:talk 1174:next 1160:talk 1119:talk 1091:talk 1045:talk 1012:talk 983:talk 949:talk 909:talk 851:talk 799:talk 758:talk 700:talk 667:talk 585:talk 556:talk 532:and 515:talk 487:talk 439:talk 399:talk 393:Done 351:talk 283:talk 201:talk 154:talk 126:edit 103:edit 2305:BLP 1858:had 1845:and 1251:But 183:Hi 2374:) 2309:no 2274:) 2266:. 2238:) 2132:) 2057:) 1997:) 1850:my 1820:) 1728:) 1703:) 1678:) 1637:) 1593:) 1528:) 1446:) 1384:) 1243:) 1235:. 1224:) 1162:) 1121:) 1093:) 1047:) 1014:) 985:) 951:) 911:) 853:) 801:) 760:) 702:) 669:) 605:}} 599:{{ 587:) 558:) 517:) 489:) 441:) 401:) 353:) 345:. 285:) 203:) 162:) 128:| 109:| 105:| 2370:( 2270:( 2234:( 2128:( 2053:( 1993:( 1963:. 1816:( 1724:( 1699:( 1674:( 1633:( 1589:( 1524:( 1442:( 1380:( 1239:( 1220:( 1158:( 1117:( 1089:( 1043:( 1010:( 981:( 947:( 907:( 849:( 797:( 756:( 698:( 665:( 583:( 554:( 513:( 485:( 437:( 397:( 386:. 349:( 281:( 199:( 157:· 152:( 135:· 132:) 124:( 116:· 113:) 101:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index