2291:
of you mind, I think you are very young to understand these terminology. Anyway let me tell you something, not everything person say holding a particular position need not to be correct, you must know this and if not known, know it by now. Secondly, its opinion as he is speaking his judgement on why Akshay was awarded and a judgement is always a opinion. Secondly, he was speaking as a jury head, he was speaking in his personal capacity, does he made the statement from an official platform, no. So simple to understand. Thirdly, its very evident he was speaking his mind as he was somehow cricising a actor and praising another, a jury head is not supposed to be biased not aleast holding a position. So evidently, its was his persnal opinion, not a fact. And its enough, you argued a lot, its totally unnecessary, try to learn. don't close your eyes n ear n thinking. Take care
2217:
from a
Presidential platform, not in personal capacity. You failed to understand that the statement that he made was not as a Chairman or neither from any official platform, hence such statement will not be considered as fact or any official statement, any any official declaration has a document where here does not have any. Thus such statement is nothing but a opinion. which has no proof to back it. No one opposed it as he does not use any official platform to amke such statement, he just said in an interview (as director Priyadarshan not as National Film Award jury head), there is difference between both. I can give two statement one as President another as a common man. I hope you understand now whats call a opinion and whats called a fact. And you can keep in footnote about it but mention correctly the scenerio (as said in an interview).
651:
1687:, which must be the best version without any doubt; after the announcement of 60th National Film Awards. At the time, there were only three images—Kamal, Mithun and Amitabh. I think you were the one who first added Mammooty's image, which was reverted by Compton and me. You say that Compton has agreed to your edit. Can you show where he has explicitly stated that? seems he is not highly active now. You should first discuss, gain consensus and only then add the image. It's really unfair to see an experienced editor behaving like this.
2234:: Not going to take anymore English lessons on what an opinion is since you are failing to understand. I don't think your mind is willing for that. However, with that example you were actually talking about difference between official and non-official declaration (not opinion). Opinion is opinion and fact is fact whether it is said officially or not. Evidence ? He was the Chairman of the Jury and his statement is "authoritative" (not challenged too), whether YOU accept it or not.
518:
201:
369:
2367:
2267:: I said I have backed out from teaching YOU. You are not ready to think on it. It's becoming clearer and clearer. You are again talking about official and non-official talks. Not going to repeat myself, you need to read this discussion from the top again. Relax and take some time away first. The one who made the statement here is in the capacity to make that and it was not an opinion. How is it hard to understand.
428:
400:
1330:
1248:
1166:
1084:
1002:
920:
832:
281:
573:
546:
438:
583:
339:
498:
1683:, you say that I sound like claiming ownership of the article. I clearly know that nobody owns any of the stuff over here, but I've worked a lot and copy-edited each and every single line of this list. According to you last November was the best version, but if you check the talk page, the list passed FLC on
2152:
The question is, Is it officially declared?? NO. If any official publication or official press release you can show, you can put it there. I will not question it. Its an opinion when it not officially declared, as simple as that. There is difference from a general interview (personal interview) and a
1423:
actors who won the award thrice, that's what is significant as far as the award is concerned. Leaving out
Mammootty's image by invoking arbitrary criteria like most successful actor after 2000, won on debut film, etc. are not in good spirit. No harm done in having another image. If you want to remove
1445:
I never said including an extra image to be a bad idea. Besides, the fact is very well mentioned in the lead, and I see no point in including an extra image to justify this fact one again pitorially in a list that is already filled with enough images. The Kamal and
Amitabh images expresses something
2376:
Nobody has contested the sources mentioned in LTBS's first statement above, so I assume there is no problem with their reliability. In them, Priyadarshan is noted as the jury head / chair, and he states "For technical reasons, we could only mention one film in the list of winners." and "we thought
2290:
Why are asking me to understand anything, I am clear on all, but you are failing to differentiate between fact an opinion. No he does have any capacity to say anything he likes. He is head of jury does not give him authority to say anything which is not back by any official declaration. Are you out
2249:
I don't ask you to take english lesson from me. But by saying I will not learn something makes you blind at the very moment. An opinion is an opinion, a fact is a fact. Are you trying to say when PM of a country goes to rally and speak his mind producing any data to the people becomes a fact!!! May
1794:
That's okay! isn't the same fact well-mentioned in the lead? Although there is no strict guideline on image caption, if you look at some of the FLC pages, I've come across many reviewers commenting about what image to include, what caption to use? etc., I completely lost my interest and don't think
2216:
No, I don't have any wrong idea. But I think you are failed to understand between a opinion and calling something fact when it not written anywhere or mentionaed anywhere formally and officially. If I am
President of country, my statement becoem a fact when I give the statement as a President, or
1746:
As I said earlier, I'm personally not against adding any image. If you look at the caption of Kamal and
Amitabh, it's conveys something that is very different from the actors winning the award three times. Likewise, something for Mammooty would be more appreciated, rather than the usual fact which
1567:
If somebody wants to add two-time winners (there are many I suppose), we can tell them that three-time winners are more noteworthy than two-time winners and adding all the two-time winners might clutter the article with images. So far nobody has tried such a thing, so you don't have to worry. Only
1593:
has understood your rationale; in one of his reverts he says "Haasan is here because he is the first actor to win the award thrice and
Bachchan is the most one successful since 2000; this is a featured list, so discuss changes before making them". You should stop making reverts and discuss first.
1773:
Vensatry, it's not for the sake of adding the image, he has won it three times. That is the maximum number and is most significant achievement. First time winner, won on debut film, after 2000, etc. are minor (I would say trivial) compare to the maximum number of wins. If you find image caption
2250:
God save you. Open your mind lil' bit more, a person's word cannot be authoratative, if its not formally and officially produced. A fact is always backed by evidence or proof, if its not there than its not a fact as simple as that. I m teaching you english lesson, but common sense for sure.
1471:
Actors winning awards for their debut films are definitely noteworthy; not for someone who wins their first award after acting in 150+ films over a span of 10 years. You're welcome to add the image of
Mammooty, but with a reasonable caption (reliably-sourced) other than the three-time win.
1446:
other than the three-time win. FYI, Amitabh winning the award twice post 2000 was a DYK fact, and doesn't seem like an arbitrary criteria. When you want to make meaningful changes, it's wise to start the discussion first, gain consensus and proceed, not the other way around as you did now.
858:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
164:
1712:
I feel it is ok to have
Mammooty's image. The article is not image-heavy as of now. If someone wants to ad the image of any other actor with two awards, we can say that we have only images of actors winning the award three times, and one winner at
1497:
I don't understand why you are so adamant in removing the image. The article is not cluttered with the images right now. Winning three times is more noteworthy than anything else. So, please wait for a third opinion before you revert. Thanks.
1588:
I know these lists are prone to POV pushing and soon we shall expect more images of other actors too. Going by your intention to insert the image, I can very well say that you're a fan of the actor and a POV pusher too. How do you say that
264:
215:
55:
2178:
source and his words are official (authoritative). You are talking as it was challenged, which is not. May be a footnote can be added saying, "according to then Jury
Chairman Priyadarshan, Kumar won the award for both
2126:
158:
2098:
is awarded for "Rustom". Its as simple as that. What fans feel, what someone thinks, what is the opinion of one jury member or technical mistake does not count. Whatever is official is to be put (period).
2455:
2450:
2385:
in a footnote seems appropriate, properly cited with in-text attribution. In interviews with X, then-jury chairman Y stated that (brief summary of statement). This is a non-binding third opinion. –
1356:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
1274:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
1192:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
1110:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
1028:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
946:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
806:
2515:
2117:: Not just any member of the jury, he was the Jury Chairman, the HEAD of the jury. He represents the jury and it was not an "opinion". He clearly said the official declaration did not mention
2153:
official interview. You produce any govt doc, I will be fine with that, otherwise don't put it. And even if you want to put this info, you can put it in the footnote, not in the list.
1747:
everybody in the film world knows. I've suggested this idea once before to Salih. Instead of doing that he keeps adding the same caption just for the sake of having the image.
1538:
I don't think I was adamant. Someone might want to add two-time winners' image too. Given the way, the images are clearly going to dominate the page. Also you shouldn't forget
35:
660:
556:
527:
414:
2505:
1878:
507:
410:
353:
723:
This article is specifically about the list of "National Film Award for Best Actor". What Sobhan Babu received was the "award for the best classical film hero", see
2510:
665:
179:
2016:
2012:
1998:
1906:
1902:
1888:
2122:
146:
2074:
The official declaration is, he was awarded for Rustom. Its as simple as that. My opinion or anyone's opinion does not matter here. Further, some question,
2424:
2520:
2485:
90:
2174:" is an opinion, "he won the award for airlift" is NOT an opinion, it's a statement about a fact. And it's coming from the Chairman. Jury Chairman is a
1872:
1130:
1090:
140:
1648:
too see my contribution. At present you are the only person opposing to include the image. Please refrain from making wild and baseless allegations.
2480:
2475:
136:
2500:
2470:
641:
631:
302:
2460:
96:
186:
2525:
1879:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/63rd-National-Film-Awards-List-of-winners/articleshow/51580133.cms
1848:
2490:
1968:
1832:
317:
966:
926:
1994:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1984:
1884:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
152:
2495:
1858:
1389:
1307:
1225:
1143:
1061:
979:
897:
2465:
1048:
1008:
456:
110:
41:
115:
31:
727:. In 1970, there was only one actor who received the award for "Best actor", he was Utpal Dutt. Hence I revert your edits.
2436:
2394:
2360:
2334:
2300:
2274:
2259:
2241:
2226:
2198:
2162:
2136:
2108:
2064:
1954:
1815:
1789:
1767:
1722:
1707:
1675:
1639:
1614:
1583:
1562:
1533:
1513:
1492:
1466:
1439:
1393:
1311:
1229:
1147:
1065:
983:
901:
816:
781:
742:
712:
468:
460:
85:
884:
838:
2432:
2059:
1949:
380:
760:
was born in 1950. He won a national award in 1977 (film was released in 1976). If so he must be the youngest winner. --
1385:
1303:
1221:
1139:
1057:
975:
893:
606:
596:
551:
220:
76:
1873:
http://www.bangaloremirror.com/article/25/2013072120130721201558262f02bebdb/Mammootty-as-Basheer%E2%80%99s-Majid.html
1294:
1254:
699:, etc) instead of the language for each movie? The language could, if needed, be included along with the movie name.
2287:
2268:
2246:
2235:
2213:
2192:
2147:
2130:
464:
451:
405:
2087:
Does one member opinion need to be matched with all of the jury? "NO", thats why there is jury in the first place.
2306:
1649:
1590:
809:
2015:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1905:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1542:; at least two users are disagreeing with you. Perhaps, it's you who should wait till the discussion gets over.
724:
210:
2318:
2314:
2125:
directly quotes his words confirming the award, and further he confirms it again in another long interview in
2413:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
1774:
troubling, modify it suitably. That's it. Also, the article is not image heavy as pointed out by Dwaipayanc.
1212:
1172:
2428:
2371:
2050:
1976:
1940:
1840:
368:
200:
120:
2377:
it was only fair to honour him for both". It seems to me that the "we" is referring to the jury. Since
1376:
1336:
2354:
1972:
1375:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
1293:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
1211:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
1129:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
1047:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
965:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
883:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
2417:
2296:
2255:
2222:
2158:
2104:
2034:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2022:
1924:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1912:
802:
386:
348:
295:
224:
1975:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1839:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1568:
you are disagreeing with me, Bill william compton did not revert me because he understood my rationale.
17:
650:
1718:
1644:
To know whether I am pushing POV in inserting the actor's image, check the history of the article on
2381:
was not in the official list of winners I don't feel that it should be in the table, but mentioning
1849:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140117102812/http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/915674.aspx
753:
708:
280:
172:
66:
2390:
1985:
https://web.archive.org/web/20170606051143/http://dff.nic.in/writereaddata/NFA64PressNote2016.pdf
1866:
1806:
1758:
1698:
1630:
1605:
1553:
1483:
1457:
771:
757:
81:
2019:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1909:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2035:
1925:
2349:
2175:
1859:
http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/of-course-velu-nayakan-doesnt-dance/article4008896.ece
1340:
1258:
1176:
1094:
1012:
930:
842:
228:
62:
1988:
2292:
2264:
2251:
2231:
2218:
2167:
2154:
2114:
2100:
1852:
1416:
798:
312:
2042:
1932:
2366:
2328:
2078:
Is it official or ever any press release from govt that awarded for two films- answer "NO"
1781:
1714:
1667:
1575:
1525:
1505:
1431:
734:
2121:
due to technical reason, so it's an erroneous source and pointing towards it is useless.
1518:
I think we both are violated, may be inadvertently, the 3RR rule. We should be careful:)
1656:
and the image was very well there before you came on 4 November 2013 and deleted with a
517:
2001:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1891:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1361:
1279:
1197:
1115:
1033:
951:
863:
704:
2170:: You have the wrong idea about what an opinion is. "He should have won the award for
2041:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1931:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1652:
did not revert my final edit on 14 September 2013 after he understood the logic in my
2444:
2409:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
2386:
1798:
1750:
1690:
1622:
1597:
1545:
1475:
1449:
1368:
1286:
1204:
1122:
1040:
958:
870:
761:
2191:
was mentioned in declaration list due to technical reasons". Attributing it to him.
1408:
588:
1619:
What to do if there are users like you who are so adamant to insert more images?
455:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
2008:
1898:
443:
877:
2322:
2007:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1897:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1776:
1680:
1662:
1570:
1520:
1500:
1426:
1329:
1247:
1165:
1083:
1001:
919:
831:
729:
578:
433:
427:
399:
1364:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1282:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1200:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1118:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1036:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
954:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
866:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
1645:
1412:
1382:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
1300:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
1218:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
1136:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
1054:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
972:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
890:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
696:
692:
688:
289:
572:
545:
472:
338:
2323:
1660:. You say that I am not ready to discuss. Is this not a discussion?
604:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
2129:
also. Did any jury member challenged the Chairman's statement ? NO.
601:
322:
1075:
File:Girish Kulkarni at Masala Premier.jpg Nominated for Deletion
497:
1407:@Vensatry: I repeat my rationale here. The three actors viz.,
752:
The article states Dhanush (27) as the youngest winner. Check
362:
333:
26:
2094:
Though the above mentioned point does not matter at all...as
807:
Template talk:Did you know/National Film Award for Best Actor
649:
516:
496:
1795:
I'll touch this anymore. Anyone can do whatever they want.
357:. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
1989:
http://www.dff.nic.in/writereaddata/NFA64PressNote2016.pdf
1979:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1843:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
876:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
2319:
Press Conference to announce of 64th National Film Awards
1853:
http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print/915674.aspx
823:
File:Upendra Limaye New.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
911:
File:Kamal Haasan FICCI event.jpg Nominated for Deletion
2456:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are featured lists
1836:
1684:
1657:
1653:
1539:
1131:
image page (File:Girish Kulkarni at Masala Premier.jpg)
257:
2451:
Featured lists that have not appeared on the main page
171:
2084:
Does one member of jury means whole jury- answer "NO"
993:
File:Chiyaan Vikram Raavan.jpg Nominated for Deletion
345:
National Film Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role
207:
National Film Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role
36:
National Film Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role
2321:, it does not matter who says what at any place. -
2011:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1901:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1424:the image, cite some policy based reasons. Thanks.
1367:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
1285:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
1203:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
1121:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
1039:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
957:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
869:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
2516:FL-Class Indian cinema articles of High-importance
288:A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge's
2313:is not mentioned in the official press release,
1239:File:Prakashraj Bhung.jpg Nominated for Deletion
600:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
44:for general discussion of the article's subject.
687:Wouldn't it be better to link to the industry (
471:. To improve this article, please refer to the
2423:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
2090:Did anyother member of jury mention such? "NO"
1997:This message was posted before February 2018.
1887:This message was posted before February 2018.
967:image page (File:Kamal Haasan FICCI event.jpg)
315:is the most frequent winner since 2000 at the
185:
8:
1157:File:Nana patekar.jpg Nominated for Deletion
841:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
2081:Is the interview a official interview? "NO"
1321:File:SaifAliKhan.jpg Nominated for Deletion
1049:image page (File:Chiyaan Vikram Raavan.jpg)
1967:I have just modified one external link on
1091:File:Girish Kulkarni at Masala Premier.jpg
540:
467:. To use this banner, please refer to the
394:
236:
195:
2506:FL-Class India articles of Mid-importance
1831:I have just modified 3 external links on
885:image page (File:Upendra Limaye New.jpg)
1960:External links modified (February 2018)
542:
396:
18:Talk:National Film Award for Best Actor
2511:High-importance Indian cinema articles
1295:image page (File:Prakashraj Bhung.jpg)
1339:, has been nominated for deletion at
1257:, has been nominated for deletion at
1175:, has been nominated for deletion at
1093:, has been nominated for deletion at
1011:, has been nominated for deletion at
929:, has been nominated for deletion at
366:
7:
594:This article is within the scope of
449:This article is within the scope of
1371:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
1289:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
1207:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
1125:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
1043:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
961:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
873:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
703:Not really. What is there is fine.
385:It is of interest to the following
351:by Knowledge editors, which is now
227:. If you can update or improve it,
34:for discussing improvements to the
2521:WikiProject Indian cinema articles
1969:National Film Award for Best Actor
1833:National Film Award for Best Actor
1213:image page (File:Nana patekar.jpg)
792:National Film Award for Best Actor
318:National Film Award for Best Actor
25:
2486:Indian cinema task force articles
1971:. Please take a moment to review
1835:. Please take a moment to review
1377:image page (File:SaifAliKhan.jpg)
927:File:Kamal Haasan FICCI event.jpg
525:This article is supported by the
505:This article is supported by the
2365:
1328:
1246:
1164:
1082:
1000:
918:
830:
581:
571:
544:
465:regional and topical task forces
436:
426:
398:
367:
337:
279:
199:
56:Click here to start a new topic.
2481:FL-Class Indian cinema articles
2476:Film awards task force articles
1877:Corrected formatting/usage for
1857:Corrected formatting/usage for
1335:An image used in this article,
1253:An image used in this article,
1171:An image used in this article,
1089:An image used in this article,
1007:An image used in this article,
925:An image used in this article,
837:An image used in this article,
636:This article has been rated as
1955:01:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
1009:File:Chiyaan Vikram Raavan.jpg
1:
2501:Mid-importance India articles
2471:FL-Class film awards articles
2065:17:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
658:This article is supported by
53:Put new text under old text.
2461:Old requests for peer review
1816:06:22, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
1790:04:44, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
1768:02:28, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
1723:02:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
1708:02:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
1676:06:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
1640:06:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
1615:05:52, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
1584:18:09, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1563:17:55, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1534:17:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1514:17:41, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1493:17:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1467:17:30, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1440:17:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
1345:Deletion requests April 2012
1263:Deletion requests April 2012
1181:Deletion requests April 2012
1099:Deletion requests April 2012
1017:Deletion requests April 2012
935:Deletion requests April 2012
743:18:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
2305:This was also discussed at
1343:in the following category:
1261:in the following category:
1179:in the following category:
1097:in the following category:
1015:in the following category:
933:in the following category:
839:File:Upendra Limaye New.jpg
661:the Indian cinema workgroup
616:Knowledge:WikiProject India
309:The text of the entry was:
61:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
2542:
2526:WikiProject India articles
2437:17:41, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
2395:00:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
2361:18:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
2335:07:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
2028:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1964:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1918:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1828:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1394:15:34, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
1312:14:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
1230:14:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
1148:14:08, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
1066:13:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
984:13:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
902:10:07, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
878:Commons Undeletion Request
845:for the following reason:
817:16:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
642:project's importance scale
619:Template:WikiProject India
481:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
213:, which means it has been
2491:WikiProject Film articles
2343:in the table and mention
2307:64th National Film Awards
2301:09:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
2275:08:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
2260:08:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
2242:08:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
2227:20:28, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
2199:19:49, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
2163:18:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
2137:18:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
2109:17:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
1255:File:Prakashraj Bhung.jpg
782:07:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
657:
635:
566:
524:
504:
484:Template:WikiProject Film
421:
393:
239:
235:
91:Be welcoming to newcomers
2070:Akshay Kumar awarded for
713:16:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
528:Indian cinema task force
2496:FL-Class India articles
2339:How about we list only
1824:External links modified
265:Featured list candidate
2466:FL-Class film articles
1386:CommonsNotificationBot
1304:CommonsNotificationBot
1222:CommonsNotificationBot
1140:CommonsNotificationBot
1058:CommonsNotificationBot
976:CommonsNotificationBot
894:CommonsNotificationBot
812:— Bill william compton
654:
521:
508:Film awards task force
501:
375:This article is rated
325:), winning two awards?
311:Did you know ... that
86:avoid personal attacks
2315:Presentation Ceremony
2288:Let There Be Sunshine
2271:Let There Be Sunshine
2247:Let There Be Sunshine
2238:Let There Be Sunshine
2214:Let There Be Sunshine
2195:Let There Be Sunshine
2148:Let There Be Sunshine
2133:Let There Be Sunshine
1173:File:Nana patekar.jpg
653:
520:
500:
111:Neutral point of view
2096:OFFICIAL DECLARATION
2009:regular verification
1899:regular verification
1650:Bill william compton
1591:Bill william compton
1337:File:SaifAliKhan.jpg
847:Copyright violations
116:No original research
1999:After February 2018
1889:After February 2018
1403:Removal of an image
457:join the discussion
225:Knowledge community
219:as one of the best
2429:Community Tech bot
2053:InternetArchiveBot
2004:InternetArchiveBot
1943:InternetArchiveBot
1894:InternetArchiveBot
1658:vague edit summary
1369:fair use rationale
1287:fair use rationale
1205:fair use rationale
1123:fair use rationale
1041:fair use rationale
959:fair use rationale
871:fair use rationale
758:Mithun Chakraborty
655:
522:
502:
381:content assessment
258:September 19, 2013
240:Article milestones
97:dispute resolution
58:
2029:
1919:
1685:19 September 2013
1400:
1399:
1349:What should I do?
1341:Wikimedia Commons
1318:
1317:
1267:What should I do?
1259:Wikimedia Commons
1236:
1235:
1185:What should I do?
1177:Wikimedia Commons
1154:
1153:
1103:What should I do?
1095:Wikimedia Commons
1072:
1071:
1021:What should I do?
1013:Wikimedia Commons
990:
989:
939:What should I do?
931:Wikimedia Commons
908:
907:
851:What should I do?
843:Wikimedia Commons
777:
767:
680:
679:
676:
675:
672:
671:
597:WikiProject India
539:
538:
535:
534:
459:and see lists of
361:
360:
332:
331:
274:
273:
194:
193:
77:Assume good faith
54:
16:(Redirected from
2533:
2369:
2359:
2357:
2331:
2325:
2151:
2063:
2054:
2027:
2026:
2005:
1953:
1944:
1917:
1916:
1895:
1870:
1814:
1811:
1803:
1788:
1785:
1779:
1766:
1763:
1755:
1706:
1703:
1695:
1674:
1671:
1665:
1638:
1635:
1627:
1613:
1610:
1602:
1582:
1579:
1573:
1561:
1558:
1550:
1532:
1529:
1523:
1512:
1509:
1503:
1491:
1488:
1480:
1465:
1462:
1454:
1438:
1435:
1429:
1417:Amitabh Bachchan
1360:If the image is
1332:
1325:
1324:
1278:If the image is
1250:
1243:
1242:
1196:If the image is
1168:
1161:
1160:
1114:If the image is
1086:
1079:
1078:
1032:If the image is
1004:
997:
996:
950:If the image is
922:
915:
914:
862:If the image is
834:
827:
826:
814:
813:
778:
773:
768:
763:
741:
738:
732:
624:
623:
620:
617:
614:
591:
586:
585:
584:
575:
568:
567:
562:
559:
548:
541:
489:
488:
485:
482:
479:
452:WikiProject Film
446:
441:
440:
439:
430:
423:
422:
417:
402:
395:
378:
372:
371:
363:
341:
334:
313:Amitabh Bachchan
283:
260:
237:
223:produced by the
203:
196:
190:
189:
175:
106:Article policies
27:
21:
2541:
2540:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2441:
2440:
2425:nomination page
2411:
2355:
2348:
2347:in a footnote?
2329:
2145:
2127:Hindustan Times
2072:
2057:
2052:
2020:
2013:have permission
2003:
1977:this simple FaQ
1962:
1947:
1942:
1910:
1903:have permission
1893:
1864:
1841:this simple FaQ
1826:
1813:
1807:
1799:
1796:
1783:
1777:
1775:
1765:
1759:
1751:
1748:
1705:
1699:
1691:
1688:
1669:
1663:
1661:
1637:
1631:
1623:
1620:
1612:
1606:
1598:
1595:
1577:
1571:
1569:
1560:
1554:
1546:
1543:
1527:
1521:
1519:
1507:
1501:
1499:
1490:
1484:
1476:
1473:
1464:
1458:
1450:
1447:
1433:
1427:
1425:
1405:
1323:
1241:
1159:
1077:
995:
913:
825:
811:
810:
794:
789:
780:
772:
762:
750:
748:Youngest Winner
736:
730:
728:
721:
685:
666:High-importance
621:
618:
615:
612:
611:
587:
582:
580:
560:
554:
486:
483:
480:
477:
476:
442:
437:
435:
408:
379:on Knowledge's
376:
328:
327:
307:
256:
132:
127:
126:
125:
102:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2539:
2537:
2529:
2528:
2523:
2518:
2513:
2508:
2503:
2498:
2493:
2488:
2483:
2478:
2473:
2468:
2463:
2458:
2453:
2443:
2442:
2421:
2420:
2418:Suriya2011.jpg
2410:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2140:
2139:
2092:
2091:
2088:
2085:
2082:
2079:
2071:
2068:
2047:
2046:
2039:
1992:
1991:
1983:Added archive
1961:
1958:
1937:
1936:
1929:
1882:
1881:
1875:
1861:
1855:
1847:Added archive
1825:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1805:
1757:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1697:
1629:
1604:
1552:
1516:
1482:
1456:
1404:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1373:
1372:
1365:
1351:
1350:
1333:
1322:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1291:
1290:
1283:
1269:
1268:
1251:
1240:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1209:
1208:
1201:
1187:
1186:
1169:
1158:
1155:
1152:
1151:
1127:
1126:
1119:
1105:
1104:
1087:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1045:
1044:
1037:
1023:
1022:
1005:
994:
991:
988:
987:
963:
962:
955:
941:
940:
923:
912:
909:
906:
905:
881:
880:
874:
867:
853:
852:
835:
824:
821:
820:
819:
793:
790:
788:
787:DYK nomination
785:
770:
749:
746:
720:
717:
716:
715:
684:
681:
678:
677:
674:
673:
670:
669:
656:
646:
645:
638:Mid-importance
634:
628:
627:
625:
622:India articles
593:
592:
576:
564:
563:
561:Mid‑importance
549:
537:
536:
533:
532:
523:
513:
512:
503:
493:
492:
490:
448:
447:
431:
419:
418:
403:
391:
390:
384:
373:
359:
358:
342:
330:
329:
308:
303:August 9, 2011
287:
286:
284:
276:
275:
272:
271:
268:
261:
253:
252:
249:
246:
242:
241:
233:
232:
204:
192:
191:
129:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
104:
103:
101:
100:
93:
88:
79:
73:
71:
70:
59:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2538:
2527:
2524:
2522:
2519:
2517:
2514:
2512:
2509:
2507:
2504:
2502:
2499:
2497:
2494:
2492:
2489:
2487:
2484:
2482:
2479:
2477:
2474:
2472:
2469:
2467:
2464:
2462:
2459:
2457:
2454:
2452:
2449:
2448:
2446:
2439:
2438:
2434:
2430:
2426:
2419:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2408:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2375:
2373:
2368:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2358:
2353:
2352:
2346:
2342:
2338:
2337:
2336:
2332:
2326:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2289:
2286:
2276:
2273:
2272:
2266:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2248:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2240:
2239:
2233:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2215:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2200:
2197:
2196:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2149:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2138:
2135:
2134:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2097:
2089:
2086:
2083:
2080:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2069:
2067:
2066:
2061:
2056:
2055:
2044:
2040:
2037:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2024:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2000:
1995:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1965:
1959:
1957:
1956:
1951:
1946:
1945:
1934:
1930:
1927:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1914:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1890:
1885:
1880:
1876:
1874:
1868:
1862:
1860:
1856:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1829:
1823:
1817:
1812:
1810:
1804:
1802:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1787:
1780:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1764:
1762:
1756:
1754:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1704:
1702:
1696:
1694:
1686:
1682:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1673:
1666:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1636:
1634:
1628:
1626:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1611:
1609:
1603:
1601:
1592:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1581:
1574:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1559:
1557:
1551:
1549:
1541:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1531:
1524:
1517:
1515:
1511:
1504:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1489:
1487:
1481:
1479:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1463:
1461:
1455:
1453:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1437:
1430:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1402:
1396:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1355:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1331:
1327:
1326:
1320:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1296:
1288:
1284:
1281:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1273:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1238:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1206:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1191:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1167:
1163:
1162:
1156:
1150:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1124:
1120:
1117:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1109:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1074:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1027:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1003:
999:
998:
992:
986:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
968:
960:
956:
953:
949:
948:
947:
945:
938:
937:
936:
932:
928:
924:
921:
917:
916:
910:
904:
903:
899:
895:
891:
887:
886:
879:
875:
872:
868:
865:
861:
860:
859:
857:
850:
849:
848:
844:
840:
836:
833:
829:
828:
822:
818:
815:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:
791:
786:
784:
783:
779:
776:
769:
766:
759:
756:which states
755:
747:
745:
744:
740:
733:
726:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
701:
700:
698:
694:
690:
682:
667:
664:(assessed as
663:
662:
652:
648:
647:
643:
639:
633:
630:
629:
626:
609:
608:
603:
599:
598:
590:
579:
577:
574:
570:
569:
565:
558:
553:
550:
547:
543:
530:
529:
519:
515:
514:
510:
509:
499:
495:
494:
491:
487:film articles
474:
470:
469:documentation
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:
445:
434:
432:
429:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
407:
404:
401:
397:
392:
388:
382:
374:
370:
365:
364:
356:
355:
350:
346:
343:
340:
336:
335:
326:
324:
320:
319:
314:
305:
304:
299:
297:
296:Did you know?
291:
285:
282:
278:
277:
269:
267:
266:
262:
259:
255:
254:
250:
247:
244:
243:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:
212:
211:featured list
208:
205:
202:
198:
197:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
131:
130:
122:
121:Verifiability
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
98:
94:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
68:
64:
63:Learn to edit
60:
57:
52:
51:
48:
47:
43:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
2422:
2412:
2382:
2378:
2370:
2351:Kailash29792
2350:
2344:
2340:
2310:
2270:
2237:
2194:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2171:
2132:
2118:
2095:
2093:
2073:
2051:
2048:
2023:source check
2002:
1996:
1993:
1966:
1963:
1941:
1938:
1913:source check
1892:
1886:
1883:
1830:
1827:
1808:
1800:
1760:
1752:
1745:
1700:
1692:
1654:edit summary
1632:
1624:
1607:
1599:
1555:
1547:
1485:
1477:
1459:
1451:
1420:
1409:Kamal Haasan
1406:
1381:
1380:
1374:
1353:
1352:
1344:
1299:
1298:
1292:
1271:
1270:
1262:
1217:
1216:
1210:
1189:
1188:
1180:
1135:
1134:
1128:
1107:
1106:
1098:
1053:
1052:
1046:
1025:
1024:
1016:
971:
970:
964:
943:
942:
934:
889:
888:
882:
855:
854:
846:
797:Promoted by
774:
764:
751:
722:
686:
659:
637:
607:project page
605:
595:
589:India portal
526:
506:
450:
387:WikiProjects
352:
344:
316:
310:
301:
293:
263:
229:please do so
214:
206:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
105:
30:This is the
2293:Dey subrata
2265:Dey subrata
2252:Dey subrata
2232:Dey subrata
2219:Dey subrata
2187:, but only
2168:Dey subrata
2155:Dey subrata
2115:Dey subrata
2101:Dey subrata
1354:Don't panic
1272:Don't panic
1190:Don't panic
1108:Don't panic
1026:Don't panic
944:Don't panic
856:Don't panic
799:Crisco 1492
719:Sobhan Babu
444:Film portal
349:peer review
347:received a
159:free images
42:not a forum
2445:Categories
2176:WP:PRIMARY
2060:Report bug
1950:Report bug
473:guidelines
461:open tasks
300:column on
216:identified
2374:Response:
2123:The Quint
2043:this tool
2036:this tool
1933:this tool
1926:this tool
1867:dead link
1715:Dwaipayan
1646:Mammootty
1413:Mammootty
775:(Ping Me)
765:Commander
705:GDibyendu
697:Tollywood
693:Kollywood
689:Bollywood
290:Main Page
99:if needed
82:Be polite
32:talk page
2387:Reidgreg
2049:Cheers.—
1939:Cheers.—
1801:Vensatry
1753:Vensatry
1713:debut.--
1693:Vensatry
1625:Vensatry
1600:Vensatry
1548:Vensatry
1540:this one
1478:Vensatry
1452:Vensatry
1419:are the
1362:non-free
1280:non-free
1198:non-free
1116:non-free
1034:non-free
952:non-free
864:non-free
683:Untitled
377:FL-class
354:archived
270:Promoted
67:get help
40:This is
38:article.
2383:Airlift
2379:Airlift
2345:Airlift
2311:Airlift
2185:Airlift
2172:Airlift
2119:Airlift
1973:my edit
1871:tag to
1837:my edit
640:on the
292:in the
248:Process
165:WP refs
153:scholar
2356:(talk)
2341:Rustom
2317:, and
2189:Rustom
2181:Rustom
1863:Added
1809:(Ping)
1761:(Ping)
1701:(Ping)
1633:(Ping)
1608:(Ping)
1556:(Ping)
1486:(Ping)
1460:(Ping)
1415:, and
557:Cinema
415:Indian
411:Awards
383:scale.
251:Result
137:Google
2324:Vivvt
2309:. If
1778:Salih
1681:Salih
1664:Salih
1572:Salih
1522:Salih
1502:Salih
1428:Salih
731:Salih
613:India
602:India
552:India
323:India
221:lists
209:is a
180:JSTOR
141:books
95:Seek
2433:talk
2391:talk
2330:Talk
2297:talk
2256:talk
2223:talk
2183:and
2159:talk
2105:talk
1784:talk
1719:talk
1670:talk
1578:talk
1528:talk
1508:talk
1434:talk
1421:only
1390:talk
1308:talk
1226:talk
1144:talk
1062:talk
980:talk
898:talk
803:talk
754:this
737:talk
725:here
709:talk
478:Film
463:and
406:Film
245:Date
173:FENS
147:news
84:and
2427:. —
2017:RfC
1987:to
1907:RfC
1851:to
805:):
632:Mid
187:TWL
2447::
2435:)
2393:)
2372:3O
2333:)
2299:)
2269:--
2258:)
2236:--
2225:)
2193:--
2161:)
2131:--
2107:)
2030:.
2025:}}
2021:{{
1920:.
1915:}}
1911:{{
1869:}}
1865:{{
1721:)
1411:,
1392:)
1384:--
1310:)
1302:--
1228:)
1220:--
1146:)
1138:--
1064:)
1056:--
982:)
974:--
900:)
892:--
711:)
695:,
691:,
668:).
555::
413:/
409::
167:)
65:;
2431:(
2389:(
2327:(
2295:(
2254:(
2221:(
2157:(
2150::
2146:@
2103:(
2062:)
2058:(
2045:.
2038:.
1952:)
1948:(
1935:.
1928:.
1797:—
1786:)
1782:(
1749:—
1717:(
1689:—
1672:)
1668:(
1621:—
1596:—
1580:)
1576:(
1544:—
1530:)
1526:(
1510:)
1506:(
1474:—
1448:—
1436:)
1432:(
1388:(
1306:(
1224:(
1142:(
1060:(
978:(
896:(
801:(
739:)
735:(
707:(
644:.
610:.
531:.
511:.
475:.
389::
321:(
306:.
298:"
294:"
231:.
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
