299:. Your first comment is misplaced. Godhra incident is a controversial incident and not the commission. Though its report may be opposed but the finding can be quoted as its opinion. There is no point of making statements like " it is not advisable to use the report for the actual findings, and any attempt to do so will be reverted" as the controversial part is not the issue for discussion on this page but on
80:
53:
22:
90:
158:
567:
571:
317:
If harping on seniority makes you feel better, you are welcome to do so. Between your first and second replies you changed your position to match mine, and that is all that matters in this case (although you are once again welcome to insist otherwise). As I said at first, and as you have now agreed,
411:
WP:COMMONNAME would indicate that "Nanavati-Shah commission" is the correct title; google, google scholar, Jstor, as well as an academic search engine I have access to, all pull up more results for NS rather than NM. Unless there is a significant NPOV violation with the old name, it should be moved
347:
Nope. The first time you implied they may be used without reserve; the second time, you said they should be quoted, which is correct. Since you made that statement, the only possible conclusion was that you had not read the policy (or perhaps not read it recently enough) which is what I said.
332:
I did not change my position. I said findings can be used in this article and if they have to be, it shall be the commission's view as that is what this page is about. I was not harping my seniority. I was just pointing out how you declare yourself that you know all the policies and others
280:
from the report for the findings, but cannot use the report as interpretation in any way, nor can you use it to say "such and such is exactly what happened." The topic is not relevant (unless of course this had been a BLP, in which case primary sources need even greater scrutiny).
583:: Justice Mehta has been a part of the commission for a larger period of time. The interim report bore Justice Shah's signature and the coming final report shall also bear his signature. It is preferable and logical to refer the commission by its existing composition.--
233:
So far, the actual interim report of the commission has been used only for easily verifiable factual information, such as about the appointment. However, it is not advisable to use the report for the actual findings, and any attempt to do so will be reverted, as per
253:
This page deals with the
Nanavati-Shah Commission and not with Godhra train burning incident which has been discussed elsewhere. Hence the findings of this commission can be used here and are not liable for removal. Any removal should be
474:
That may seem to be logical, but the search engines don't bear that out; limiting the searches to things post-2008, when Shah was replaced by Mehta, still yields more results for
Nanavati-Shah commission.
725:
Is there a way to access this source - "Iyer, SH (May–June 2008). "Babu
Bajrangi's bail and Gujarat riot probe". Combat Law. 7 (3): 16–19"? This citation appears to be incomplete or unclear. —
548:
And of course it redirects here; I created the page at NS commission, it was moved here, and the old title was kept as a redirect, per procedure. The fact that it redirects here shows nothing.
276:
page a source is being used for. A primary source can be used for non-controversial, factual, verifiable information, like the dates of appointment that you just used it for. You can also
731:
796:
781:
635:
667:
663:
649:
726:
791:
172:
776:
148:
138:
801:
570:
for "Nanavati Mehta commission" within double quotation marks returns 1,24,000 results and "Nanavati Shah commission" in the similar manner
448:
Since shah was replaced with Mehta it did become
Nanavati-Mehta. Its the new/current name that has indeed caught up in published sources
806:
449:
295:
Sorry but I am surprised by your attitude. Do not frame opinions on your own. Comparatively being a senior editor to you, I have read
786:
645:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
636:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130119002050/http://liveindia.tv/india/states/special-court-convicts-31-in-godhra-train-burning-case/
771:
199:
639:
167:
63:
710:
33:
113:
103:
58:
613:
502:
It reflects the name of the two people who worked on the report and this is appropriately explained in the lead.
210:
195:
666:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
506:
366:
That clarification was just to make you understand as it appeared that you feel that you are a revert champ.--
194:
The
Tehelka expose about Pandya's statements regarding the Nanavati-Shah commission need to be added as well.
629:
701:
621:
753:
617:
685:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
673:
553:
539:
480:
439:
417:
357:
323:
286:
243:
218:
39:
620:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
588:
531:
371:
338:
308:
300:
259:
348:
Regardless, you have now said that you have read it, so further discussion is pointless. See you at
21:
578:
510:
464:
381:
746:
670:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
686:
749:
496:
349:
296:
269:
549:
535:
476:
435:
413:
353:
319:
282:
239:
214:
693:
238:, because this is a highly controversial topic, and is best edited using academic sources.
213:
that would be my bad, I thought I'd added it, I'll work on that. Feel free to do the same.
584:
429:
367:
334:
304:
255:
640:
http://liveindia.tv/india/states/special-court-convicts-31-in-godhra-train-burning-case/
652:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
526:
And a search for
Nanavati Shah commission yields 89,100 results. On google scholar, NS
757:
736:
715:
692:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
592:
557:
543:
515:
484:
469:
443:
421:
386:
375:
361:
342:
327:
312:
290:
263:
247:
222:
203:
765:
235:
95:
659:
318:
the report may be quoted, but not used for any form of analysis. End of story.
658:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
85:
380:
Intereting(and humouros) reading as Van tries to dictate MS what MS means! --
157:
79:
52:
630:
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2002/03/07/stories/2002030706110100.htm
456:
434:, a response would be appreciated, I do not want to move war with you....
452:
111:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
108:
15:
156:
459:, there may be more reference to Calcutta but the new name
624:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
272:(which you clearly did not read) says nothing about
662:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
495:A Google search for "Nanavati-Mehta commission"
107:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
648:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
797:B-Class Gujarat articles of High-importance
47:
612:I have just modified 2 external links on
352:whenever you choose to respond (or not).
782:B-Class India articles of Mid-importance
605:External links modified (February 2018)
463:Kolkata and will eventually catchup. --
49:
19:
732:
7:
101:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
616:. Please take a moment to review
792:High-importance Gujarat articles
577:In addition to points raised by
509:appropriately redirects here. --
88:
78:
51:
20:
628:Corrected formatting/usage for
143:This article has been rated as
530:still gets 18; NM gets 4. See
1:
777:Mid-importance India articles
716:22:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
165:This article is supported by
802:WikiProject Gujarat articles
758:14:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
593:13:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
558:05:17, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
544:05:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
516:04:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
485:03:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
470:02:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
444:17:10, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
422:16:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
387:09:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
123:Knowledge:WikiProject India
823:
807:WikiProject India articles
679:(last update: 5 June 2024)
609:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
376:23:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
362:22:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
343:22:47, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
328:22:39, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
313:22:31, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
291:22:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
264:21:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
248:21:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
223:17:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
204:15:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
149:project's importance scale
126:Template:WikiProject India
737:14:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
614:Nanavati-Mehta Commission
164:
142:
73:
46:
787:B-Class Gujarat articles
507:Nanavati-Shah commission
772:B-Class India articles
499:about 45,700 results.
161:
28:This article is rated
160:
728:Nearly Headless Nick
660:regular verification
301:Godhra train burning
196:Kanga Roo in the Zoo
650:After February 2018
168:WikiProject Gujarat
704:InternetArchiveBot
655:InternetArchiveBot
350:Talk: Rahul Gandhi
162:
34:content assessment
680:
187:
186:
183:
182:
179:
178:
104:WikiProject India
814:
734:
729:
714:
705:
678:
677:
656:
581:
513:
467:
433:
384:
131:
130:
127:
124:
121:
98:
93:
92:
91:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
822:
821:
817:
816:
815:
813:
812:
811:
762:
761:
744:
727:
723:
708:
703:
671:
664:have permission
654:
622:this simple FaQ
607:
579:
511:
465:
427:
409:
382:
231:
229:Primary Sources
192:
173:High-importance
128:
125:
122:
119:
118:
94:
89:
87:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
820:
818:
810:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
774:
764:
763:
743:
740:
722:
719:
698:
697:
690:
643:
642:
634:Added archive
632:
606:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
580:AmritasyaPutra
575:
561:
560:
546:
519:
518:
512:AmritasyaPutra
503:
500:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
466:AmritasyaPutra
408:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
383:AmritasyaPutra
230:
227:
226:
225:
191:
190:Tehelka expose
188:
185:
184:
181:
180:
177:
176:
163:
153:
152:
145:Mid-importance
141:
135:
134:
132:
129:India articles
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
819:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
775:
773:
770:
769:
767:
760:
759:
755:
751:
748:
741:
739:
738:
735:
730:
720:
718:
717:
712:
707:
706:
695:
691:
688:
684:
683:
682:
675:
669:
665:
661:
657:
651:
646:
641:
637:
633:
631:
627:
626:
625:
623:
619:
615:
610:
604:
594:
590:
586:
582:
576:
573:
569:
568:Google search
565:
564:
563:
562:
559:
555:
551:
547:
545:
541:
537:
533:
532:WP:COMMONNAME
529:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
517:
514:
508:
504:
501:
498:
494:
493:
486:
482:
478:
473:
472:
471:
468:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
431:
426:
425:
424:
423:
419:
415:
406:
388:
385:
379:
378:
377:
373:
369:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
351:
346:
345:
344:
340:
336:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
288:
284:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
265:
261:
257:
252:
251:
250:
249:
245:
241:
237:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
189:
174:
171:(assessed as
170:
169:
159:
155:
154:
150:
146:
140:
137:
136:
133:
116:
115:
110:
106:
105:
97:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
750:TrangaBellam
745:
724:
721:"Combat law"
702:
699:
674:source check
653:
647:
644:
611:
608:
572:returns 4590
527:
460:
410:
277:
273:
232:
193:
166:
144:
114:project page
112:
102:
96:India portal
40:WikiProjects
585:Mohit Singh
550:Vanamonde93
536:Vanamonde93
477:Vanamonde93
436:Vanamonde93
414:Vanamonde93
407:Recent move
368:Mohit Singh
354:Vanamonde93
335:Mohit Singh
320:Vanamonde93
305:Mohit Singh
283:Vanamonde93
256:Mohit Singh
254:reverted.--
240:Vanamonde93
215:Vanamonde93
766:Categories
711:Report bug
451:. Imagine
430:MohitSingh
297:WP:PRIMARY
270:WP:PRIMARY
694:this tool
687:this tool
528:post-2008
505:Old name
742:Critique
700:Cheers.—
574:results.
497:returned
457:Calcutta
333:don't.--
268:Not so.
618:my edit
453:Kolkata
147:on the
64:Gujarat
30:B-class
412:back.
36:scale.
278:quote
274:which
236:WP:PS
120:India
109:India
59:India
754:talk
589:talk
554:talk
540:talk
481:talk
455:and
440:talk
418:talk
372:talk
358:talk
339:talk
324:talk
309:talk
287:talk
260:talk
244:talk
219:talk
200:talk
733:{c}
668:RfC
638:to
303:.--
211:KRZ
139:Mid
768::
756:)
681:.
676:}}
672:{{
591:)
566:A
556:)
542:)
534:.
483:)
461:is
442:)
420:)
374:)
360:)
341:)
326:)
311:)
289:)
262:)
246:)
221:)
202:)
175:).
62::
752:(
747:1
713:)
709:(
696:.
689:.
587:(
552:(
538:(
479:(
438:(
432::
428:@
416:(
370:(
356:(
337:(
322:(
307:(
285:(
258:(
242:(
217:(
209:@
198:(
151:.
117:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
