754:
733:
2082:@TeeVeeed I can understand your point about 25-29 leading to problems, but that can be solved by following Knowledge policies and guidelines. In this case it is possible to simply bring both sources. That is still no reason to remove the information altogether. In addition, I think that this piece of information is very important. If the plagiarism is not regarding the whole plot, or a major plot theme, but just 25-29 lines, then that is a quantitative difference which shows a qualitative difference as well, and must be mentioned, also per WP:BLP.
1076:. The lawyer from whom I heard about this originally has subsequently told me that the requirement to cite sources is not part of the Israeli (2007) copyright act, and the most anyone could reasonably expect from suing on that basis (except in extraordinary cases) would be to get an injunction requiring that the infringer cite the source, not to get monetary damages. He also admits to not be an expert in copyright law. So, this case is probably not quite as interesting as I originally thought. Sorry!
1879:
about the preservation of material as well, and I just noticed in article history that "legal" appears to be the most-edited part of the article. (I maintain that it is contentious but???)....so editor/user interest in this legal issue appears high which could have ramifications where even-if everything were scaled-back to just the basic facts that it could creep back into the bloated condition. But that just makes me think that the legal cases need their own article and get it out of this BLP
2038:
ways a nuisance-suit/censorship/"punishment"-for her views and using other people's diarys/stories to illustrate her criticisms with their culture/religion, which in US copyright law is generally permitted but as we have discussed here "plagiarism" is different from copyright anyhow. But with the over-long explanations all of it gets lost and it was definitely not appropriate as a BLP article. That is why in my opinion it needs to be just the basic facts and refs in as NPOV as we can.
1010:
which were written in Hebrew language, and I can't quite figure-out the legal issues,especially since the author was explicitly charged, (in Israel), with "transformative"-use, (to disparage the original works),which, I thought was not considered plagiarism in the US at least...........I was trying to look for the author's side to try and sum it up. If you would like to change it back, have at it! But I remain convinced with your opinion that it is too weighty anyways.
188:
840:
822:
1057:
infringement is of course complicated, e.g. not all countries have a generous concept of exemptions as US fair use (which I believe Israel adopted. (You could probably also be sued for fraud or something of that sort if for example you used a plagiarised work to help you get a job. And I guess you could come up with fairly theoretical things you could sue for, which probably aren't going to work, but the problem wouldn't be plagiarism per se.)
1403:-can't you see how allowing anything but basic mention just makes this contentious? WP:UNDUE WP:BLP and more. It is unbalanced for the article. Sure it is a little interesting, but I'm wondering if it is sooooo important-maybe the legal prob. should have it's own article? That much article space devoted to the legal thing, besides being contentious, just makes the article look petty and gossipy. I'm probably going to go ahead and fix it again.
1297:(Temporarily blocked from editing) . Also, since statements were made by that editor that other personally interested parties were being recruited to edit the legal aspects of this article, they should also not please, for reasons mentioned and others re: WP policies. I pretty much deleted most of it but left a subsection. Feel free to edit but let's not let the legal issue become problematic to the article again please. Thanks
376:
263:
242:
126:
95:
273:
64:
208:
112:
136:
2042:
Also--I did find Ragen's comments about the 25 or 29 phrases on a blog in the comments section, which I would never want to use as a ref on WP, but she has a whole other side which is/was not getting heard on this article. To paraphrase, she said something like the phrases were common words like, "my
1312:
I think your edit did more than pruning, and left out too many important and interesting details. I would also like to point out that the present version is not significantly longer or more detailed than it was before the COI editor started editing this article, nor does the present version show any
1056:
in
Israeli courts even if it isn't copyright infrigement? As far as I know (and this is what our article mentions) this isn't the case in many other countries. People may talk about plagiarism when discussing the case, but you can only sue for copyright infrigement. The question of what is copyright
1009:
Thank-you, yeah I am not sure how to proceed there, but I am trying to work out that COI question and hoping the editor would notice. Also thinking either way that a big cut of the legal material would bring the article into better balance? I was unable to translate the refs that led to publications
993:
TeeVeeed, you reverted the last edit by this editor, with the edit summary asking to react to the COI question. The edit also added a few thousand characters to the text, which already suffers from extensive detail IMHO. But if not for that latter argument, I would have reverted you. Not answering a
2037:
My problem with keeping most of the legal info is also because of the contentiousness, like this 25/29 debate that you guys are having. That is the kind-of thing that caused this to mushroom and bloat into a problem. IP editor---I am kind-of seeing the same thing that you are, that this was in some
1497:
topic? For this BLP of an author, it is just too much and the bickering and non-NPOV just looks ugly, BUT---really working with the facts of the charges and the cases could be encyclopedic, just not in this article. If it were done like that I would not object to a subscripted link in this article.
1918:
Debresser, can you please elaborate why you feel information about the final outcome in the Tal case is superfluous? If it's length which bothers you, maybe we should just edit it to state only final outcome? And actually, after making the "25 to 29" edit, I started to lean more to just using 29,
1878:
Thanks DB. I'm wondering if taking this prob to a BLP board would be a better venue than DRN? Full disclosure I am an occasional DRN volunteer. Not to be too meta, but one of my main probs with this are the BLP aspects, and I'd like to see 3rd party opinions on that specifically. I really am torn
1496:
And, in the interest in preservation, does anyone have any ideas about spinning-off the legal section to another article? A "legal case"-type article? I do think it is interesting especially in light of plagiarism in Israel vs US/Berne-convention Ā© rules. Or maybe putting the info in a plagiarism
951:
I just moved most of it intact out of the lede, all of that certainly does not belong there.And agreed too much detail about legal issues, although it probably is notable and does not violate BLP except it does seem to give undue weight. I have concerns about possible COI, but also do not want to
2404:
This higher-order WP procedural stuff is mainly unfamiliar to me, but after reading the volunteer comment at DRN, I post here so you can consider me notified. Personally, I am rather neutral, except that I feel that some of the Cross-Current references used in TeeVeeed's version are somewhat POV
2115:
Again you have accused me of behavior in the edit summary-can we please stick to content and I will try to ignore your edit-warring and 3rr AFTER you generously agreed to my terms of not changing it pending 3rd party review? In an article that is "Page length (in bytes) 8,249"... to have a legal
1937:
The source says "Well-known author Naomi Ragen's appeal to the
Israeli Supreme Court over allegations of plagiarism reached its conclusion today (Wednesday), as the Court upheld the decision of the District Court and ordered Ragen to remove some 25 phrases of questionable originality from future
1028:
Some possible information which might help understand the lawsuits section. IANAL, but I have heard from one that
Israeli IP law is different from US IP law in that it also includes "plagiarism" (use of material, even fair use, without attribution) as a punishable offense. Interesting how just a
2369:
yeah, done, but I think I was IP-oops. Notifying all editors I wonder if he means me and me as IP? So that would be myself, my IP, the other recent IPs who have edited, and maybe SS although I think she mentioned that she wanted to stay-away from this article for awhile and she is (voluntary?)
1678:
Well I do not appreciate with being threatened with edit-warring when the only thing that I proposed here on the talk page was continued editing. I am really getting tired of this topic and I'd like to move-on to other things, but I'll agree to participate in a DRN, at your suggestion, under 2
2120:, and unbalanced. That is why I asked you earlier about why you said something about a "minimum". Do you have anything that explains what exactly a "minimum" s/b? Because just looking at it it is clearly over what a "maximum" should look like in a BLP. Yes I have issues with this article, and
1033:
law is more lenient than US law, and also much less widely enforced. One wonders where the judicial vitriol in these cases came from. Just shows that the court system, while the best we have, is quite stochastic. (Oh, and as an aside, two of the three references from Cross-Currents, which are
1623:
I don't accuse you of anything, since you haven't done anything yet. I am just pointing out to you that what you proposed to do above is called edit warring on
Knowledge. Listen, I agree there is some superfluous detail here, on the other hand, this kind of thing, court cases, is what brings
1624:
publicity and is noteworthy, and that is why I disagree with your short version. I think that is in accordance with
Knowledge policies and guidelines, that the section should be pruned a little, but not too much. If you disagree, let's ask for a third opinion. I am sure an abbreviation like
1459:
What is "less than minimum"? If there are criteria for that, bring-it, since I can tell just by looking at the article that it exceeds WP standards in "maximum" ie:too much. The sentence or so from the lede, with the refs is more than enough in my opinion. I'll ignore your accusations as
2435:
I didn't even realize that other editors were worried about that source but I am too. If the "basic" version prevails, I agree that we should use other reliable source refs and include the one that you recommend. A problem being using
English-language reliable sources on the subject.
1071:
I've tried to get more information about this, and am continuing, but post an update here. It seems that the terminology in
Israeli law is different, and what I was attributing to the extra requirement for citing sources is not connected. My current understanding is that
2661:
I'm tired of looking at this article. And I'm starting to feel like I'm being pushed into edit-warring since any and every of my edits to this article are rv and challenged. Maybe I'll take another look at it in a few months or so-best wishes I'm done with this for
2483:(1) I think you mean "libeled", not "liabled." (2) While the cross-currents reference in itself would not be sufficient as a source, there are plenty of of reliable sources (Haaretz, Post, etc) to support the basic facts of the legal cases and judegements.
2043:
little angels", but
Shapiro has an entire different opinion, including all of that business about how Ragen obtained and used her story and/or words. Either way, the more details we edit this into this BLP article, the less appropriate it becomes for a BLP.
2200:
I'm not sure about this venue but a 3rd opinion is needed. In the 3o policy it says that it has to be between two editors and I disagree since this has been a slow-rolling bloat with many editors to a BLP in my opinion, but maybe we can get some opinions
1222:
Norhing (sic) except, perhaps, for the first sentence of the article: "the Court upheld the decision of the
District Court and ordered Ragen to remove some 25 phrases of questionable originality from future editions of Sotah"Ā ? Have a good day, pablo!
1237:
Then perhaps you could explain to
Debresser where he is going wrong; if he is going to edit-war he should at least read the words that he is so desperate to include, and the source to ensure that they agree. Maybe you could too. Have a nice
530:
1424:
I agree that this section can be pruned, and have said so before. I have also said that you have overdone this, reducing the section to less than the minimum. So if you want to remove some details, fine, but with measure, please.
2700:
2229:
was acting in good faith, and has been fully informed of the problem and is currently presumed to be an editor in good standing. Also-maybe add to the request my two main problems, that this is a BLP issue and therefore
1029:
change of jurisdiction can be so significant, which would seem to contradict the cognitive conflation of law and ethics as seen in most of the references. Even more interesting is the fact that, in general, Israeli
2613:"Sued by members of the Haredi community" is (1) unnecessary POV spin and (2) redundant, because the article already notes that "Ragen maintained that she was being persecuted for her criticism of Haredi Judaism."
2174:, who was consequently blocked. The dispute might include the question whether as a result of those edits the article is still neutral or not, although I am not clear whether there is a dispute on this account. 2.
2710:
674:
1679:
conditions. 1)-you format it on the DRN board. 2) I make the fix that I suggested-(legal out of the lede, and moved with refs to legal-section with the rest of it (which I think is garbage to this article,
2405:(with a probable reason I've already pointed out here), and Debresser's version should certainly include the final outcome of the Tal case, which was the only one of the three in which Ragen was cleared.
2015:
use for censorship in this case is what originally brought me to the article. However, I try hard to stick to Knowledge NPOV policy, and it irritates me when I perceive it as being violated by others.
2695:
974:
Come to think of it, I am not sure. I think that might depend on who the person is. If it were one of the parties, they would have a POV. If it were the judge, perhaps there is no real problem.
1934:
I never said I fell "information about the final outcome in the Tal case is superfluous", nor was my undo of today a removal of such information. So I have no idea what this question is about.
540:
2468:. See what it says in the notice? Potentially libelous must be removed. I am making a bold-edit to conform with BLP and I hope that we can discuss this without warring on the article please.
456:
2629:
Again I concur. The present wording is neutral "Ragen Maintained". Adding the fact that those authors were also Orthodox almost suggests that there was some kind of organized effort.
2170:
section. There is no dispute that some details can be removed from that section. Important background information: 1. This article was recently extensive edited by an involved party,
1209:
examples of Debresser edit-warring to include a piece of text, the meaning of which he is unable or unwilling to explain". That he did do this neither comic nor tragic; it is a fact.
197:
105:
441:
2347:
You want to click the link above and add something? I added the BLP issue already. At least tell them that you agree with the request and that they should come here, perhaps.
2705:
557:
402:
43:
2715:
1691:, and contentious.) blanked.)....until a DRN resolves the issue? JFTR, this is not the exact same version that you undid. There was a ref added which makes it even better.
642:
2765:
2047:
There is a lot of material, I agree and it is interesting, and may be a good article on it's own or another topic like plagiarism to be repetitive, but not in this BLP.
880:
2730:
2464:
According to the BLP notice at the very top of this page, the legal info needs to go. And here is why, on the author's website, she says that she has been liabled.
319:
2745:
804:
794:
549:
886:
471:
2685:
627:
48:
2755:
612:
396:
31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
1330:
I can't speak for others, but for me the intersection between the legal aspects and the social ones is by far the most interesting part of this article.
591:
574:
994:
question is not in itself reason for a revert yet on Knowledge, and even a proven COI is not necessarily reason for a revert. Please keep this in mind.
2725:
2307:
1577:
tHAT,S ME tEEvEEEED, I'm having trouble logging-in. Yes I know my cap-lock is wanky but now it is forcing me to do a captcha and Im too blind for it
770:
2740:
2720:
856:
329:
154:
23:
2599:
This is an improvement, but I am a little leery about Jerusalem Post as a source for this topic? Ragen I think had/or has a weekly column there.
2760:
463:
2735:
2406:
2016:
1990:
1972:
1920:
1371:
1331:
1224:
1180:
1115:
1077:
1039:
158:
2750:
2690:
2663:
2600:
2534:
2502:
2330:
2283:
1762:
1700:
1692:
1578:
1498:
1461:
761:
738:
566:
2085:
I don't really see the BLP problem. Virtually all statements in this section are well-sourced and neutrally worded. End of BLP issue.
847:
827:
162:
1144:
examples of Debresser edit-warring to include a piece of text, the meaning of which he is unable or unwilling to explain (see below)
2378:) 23:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC) edit to add, and user Nil Einne , and any others who have chimed-in here on the TP or on the article.
480:
295:
153:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
2465:
621:
607:
149:
100:
2561:
we should stick to the simple facts and avoid editorializing. I've removed the cross-current ref as it probably does not meet
1074:
all of the proceedings against Ragen have been on the basis of what would be considered in the US as copyright infringement
2248:
Good day! I have declined the request for a third opinion, as there are more than two editors discussing the issues here.
2166:. Dispute includes 1. Whether this should be mentioned in the lead at all. 2. How much details should be removed from the
1985:
The source for 29 is in Hebrew (sorry). It directly specifies 29 ("××ש××× 29 ×שפ×××") sentences without any equivocation.
2310:. I hope they will reply here and not there. I have never understood the reason to split discussions over several pages.
634:
388:
286:
247:
75:
2569:
as unnecessary editorializing. I still question whether or not mention of the lawsuits belongs in the article's lede.
1754:
526:
450:
600:
490:
224:
1819:
I agree with your conditions. Will make edit and will prepare post for WP:DR tonight. 08:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
753:
732:
2252:
may be an option in this case. (Should the case be filed at DRN, I would recuse myself from moderating.) Thanks,
2116:
section, an already pared-down legal section that is apx. 3645 bytes.....well the number speaks for itself it is
2410:
2020:
1994:
1976:
1924:
1375:
1335:
1228:
1184:
1179:
by a third person, namely me? And, more to the point, whose origin is clearly direct from a referenced source?
1119:
1081:
1043:
433:
1919:
since the main reference for 25 uses the language "some 25" which could well mean "approximately 25". Thanks,
2667:
2604:
2538:
2506:
2334:
2287:
2153:
1766:
1704:
1696:
1582:
1502:
1465:
1294:
909:
518:
425:
32:
2282:? I'm looking-at it right now and I'll try to post there. Attention there should help me with my questions.
2621:
2577:
2491:
1316:. I am not against some judicial pruning (pun intended), but see no reason to remove as much as you did.
2226:
2218:
2175:
2171:
2008:
766:
659:
583:
81:
1157:
I think the meaning is clear. Perhaps somebody would be willing to remove part of that offensive post?
111:
42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
63:
2634:
2590:
2522:
2352:
2315:
2190:
2090:
1950:
1824:
1633:
1540:
1430:
1349:
1321:
1162:
1062:
999:
979:
938:
1102:
What does " a total of 25 phases " mean? Perhaps notorious edit-warrior Debresser could clarify.
933:), I think there is too much detail about the court cases, which are added by User:Sarah Shapiro.
855:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
769:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
294:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2473:
2441:
2383:
2375:
2239:
2206:
2129:
2061:
2053:
1884:
1408:
1302:
1035:
1015:
957:
917:
46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
2234:, and that I acknowledge interest in the legal topic and think that it should maybe be spun-off.
187:
2615:
2571:
2485:
2466:
http://www.naomiragen.com/womens-issues/bleak-house-the-sordid-story-of-the-michal-tal-case-2/
952:
violate "outing" rules either. But if it is a COI, the editor would need to find other topics.
506:
411:
522:
141:
2671:
2558:
2231:
2117:
1680:
1417:
First of all, Knowledge has a good term for what you propose: edit warring. Please review
1370:(Reorganized the threading in this section due to TeeVeeed replying in the wrong place(?)
1171:
Is it comic or tragic to accuse an editor of introducing a phrase which was introduced by
694:
668:
502:
486:
39:
2630:
2586:
2518:
2348:
2326:
2311:
2279:
2258:
2186:
2086:
1946:
1820:
1684:
1629:
1536:
1426:
1400:
1345:
1317:
1158:
1058:
995:
975:
934:
839:
821:
651:
375:
2679:
2554:
2469:
2437:
2379:
2371:
2249:
2235:
2222:
2202:
2179:
2125:
2121:
2057:
2049:
1945:
I would like to ask you, are you anyhow connected to this case in any personal way?
1880:
1758:
1688:
1418:
1404:
1298:
1011:
953:
913:
514:
510:
278:
2517:
I call upon TeeVeeed to stop removing information until the discussion is finished.
2562:
2550:
1757:. So, we need to discuss before restoring previous material which was produced via
1625:
1271:
1255:
1239:
1212:
1145:
1103:
852:
498:
2565:
in this context, especially when better sources are available. I've also removed
2549:
The legal "does not need to go," as the facts of the case are well documented in
2167:
2163:
531:
Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran
2221:
was temporarily blocked and then asked not to edit the article directly due to
1193:
that depends on your sense of comedy, or tragedy. But what I said is "Here are
125:
94:
1053:
702:
494:
268:
131:
1986:
2253:
698:
262:
241:
421:
417:
207:
1942:"some 25", but would have been "some 30". In any case, stick to sources.
1399:
The legal section is an example of what we don't want Knowledge to be.
1211:
There is norhing in the source to support Debresser's/your chosen text
2003:
No, I'm just pedantic. I will admit to some personal POV against the
534:
291:
2638:
2624:
2608:
2594:
2580:
2542:
2526:
2510:
2494:
2477:
2445:
2414:
2387:
2356:
2338:
2319:
2291:
2265:
2243:
2210:
2194:
2133:
2094:
2065:
2024:
1998:
1980:
1954:
1928:
1888:
1770:
1708:
1637:
1586:
1544:
1506:
1469:
1434:
1412:
1379:
1353:
1339:
1325:
1306:
1276:
1260:
1244:
1232:
1217:
1188:
1166:
1150:
1123:
1108:
1085:
1066:
1047:
1019:
1003:
983:
961:
942:
921:
675:
Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
161:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
2162:
A dispute how to best prune the legal issue in the article about
2185:
If anybody disagrees with this description, please let me know.
2152:
As agreed above, I have posted a request for a third opinion at
2701:
Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
57:
38:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
15:
912:. The edit history of the article made me wonder about this.
206:
186:
2711:
Knowledge requested photographs of artists and entertainers
1971:
edits. Judging from your reaction this was unintentional.
1535:
IP editor, 50.182.180.55, who accused you, and of what?
2566:
1964:
1314:
1266:
1250:
1205:
1200:
1195:
1176:
1172:
1140:
1135:
1130:
931:
928:
364:
359:
354:
349:
1293:
An editor has been asked to stop editing this article
851:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
765:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
457:
Timeline of the IsraeliāPalestinian conflict in 2005
290:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2696:
C-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
1038:, a Haredi Jew who might well have a slanted POV.)
1034:incidentally rather judgemental, were authored by
885:This article has not yet received a rating on the
541:Articles needing translation from Hebrew Knowledge
2329:for now I guess.They usually post it right on DRN
1753:Also. I am attempting to comply with this policy
1313:bias, IMHO, and is well sourced. Please compare:
1761:which is another reason why I blanked most of it
1628:should lead to something like "3rd opinion".Ā :)
2124:is at the heart of it, not a mere side-concern.
1052:So just to be clear than, you can be sued for
927:As I have said already in two edit summaries (
2159:
8:
628:Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
2225:and being a party to the legal issues, BUT
1344:And what might those be, please inform us?
2706:Arts and entertainment work group articles
1270:. But at least you won the edit war, eh?
816:
727:
558:Israel articles missing geocoordinate data
442:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration
403:Unknown-importance Israel-related articles
383:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
337:
236:
89:
2716:Knowledge requested photographs of people
2370:topic-banned, so I don't know about that.
2160:Talk:Naomi Ragen#changes to legal section
643:Knowledge requested photographs in Israel
2766:Unknown-importance Jewish Women articles
2182:, just when he has problems logging in.
818:
729:
238:
91:
61:
2731:Low-importance Israel-related articles
2746:Low-importance Women writers articles
2501:TY-now I have to inform my spellcheck
2250:Dispute resolution at the Noticeboard
1128:Oh really, brave IP editor? Here are
198:the arts and entertainment work group
7:
2656:
845:This article is within the scope of
759:This article is within the scope of
284:This article is within the scope of
147:This article is within the scope of
2686:Biography articles of living people
779:Knowledge:WikiProject Women writers
472:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel
80:It is of interest to the following
2756:WikiProject Women writers articles
865:Knowledge:WikiProject Jewish Women
782:Template:WikiProject Women writers
613:Knowledge requested maps in Israel
397:Unassessed Israel-related articles
14:
868:Template:WikiProject Jewish Women
592:Israel articles needing attention
575:Israel articles needing infoboxes
838:
820:
752:
731:
418:Cleanup listing for this project
374:
271:
261:
240:
215:An editor has requested that an
134:
124:
110:
93:
62:
21:This article must adhere to the
2726:C-Class Israel-related articles
799:This article has been rated as
608:Module:Location map/data/Israel
324:This article has been rated as
171:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
2741:C-Class Women writers articles
2721:WikiProject Biography articles
2056:) 13:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
1699:) 23:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1277:07:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
908:I posted this on the editor's
555:Add geographic coordinates to
469:Participate in discussions at
174:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
2761:C-Class Jewish Women articles
2533:OK. If you will do the same.
2306:I posted the same content at
1086:06:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
859:and see a list of open tasks.
773:and see a list of open tasks.
298:and see a list of open tasks.
195:This article is supported by
24:biographies of living persons
2672:22:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2639:00:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
2625:22:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2609:20:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2595:19:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2581:18:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2543:20:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2527:18:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2511:20:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2495:15:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2478:14:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2446:12:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2415:09:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
2388:23:49, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2357:19:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2339:18:36, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2320:18:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2292:18:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2266:17:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2244:15:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2211:15:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2195:14:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2134:15:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2095:14:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2066:13:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
2025:07:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
1999:07:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
1981:07:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
1955:14:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1929:09:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1889:14:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
1771:00:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
1709:00:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
1638:22:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1587:22:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1545:21:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1507:19:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1470:19:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1435:16:32, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1413:15:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1380:07:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
1354:08:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1340:08:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1326:18:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
1307:19:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
1245:08:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1233:07:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
1218:08:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
1189:08:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
1167:16:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
1151:08:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
1124:01:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
1109:20:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
1067:11:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
1048:09:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
1020:01:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
640:Add pictures to articles in
304:Knowledge:WikiProject Israel
159:contribute to the discussion
2736:WikiProject Israel articles
1004:23:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
984:08:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
962:22:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
943:22:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
922:20:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
527:Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu
307:Template:WikiProject Israel
36:must be removed immediately
2782:
2751:WikiProject Women articles
2691:C-Class biography articles
1938:editions of Sotah." 29 is
1098:English-language Knowledge
887:project's importance scale
805:project's importance scale
610:. Add maps to articles in
491:Diamond industry in Israel
330:project's importance scale
1261:11:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
884:
833:
798:
762:WikiProject Women writers
747:
336:
323:
256:
214:
194:
119:
88:
2657:I'm done here for awhile
2585:Perfectly fine with me.
1289:Changes to legal section
848:WikiProject Jewish Women
550:Geographical coordinates
2325:OH, OK nevermind about
1295:User talk:Sarah Shapiro
1175:(presumably) and later
519:Public Defence (Israel)
420:is available. See also
310:Israel-related articles
2005:current implementation
1114:That was uncalled for.
785:Women writers articles
211:
191:
106:Arts and Entertainment
70:This article is rated
1987:Ref #12 (at the time)
871:Jewish Women articles
341:Project Israel To Do:
210:
190:
150:WikiProject Biography
2168:Naomi_Ragen#Lawsuits
1755:WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE
904:COI question rasied.
426:the tool's wiki page
422:the list by category
690:Translate to Hebrew
2227:User:Sarah Shapiro
2219:User:Sarah Shapiro
2176:User:50.182.180.55
2172:User:Sarah Shapiro
1036:Jonathan Rosenblum
606:See discussion at
287:WikiProject Israel
212:
192:
177:biography articles
76:content assessment
2460:Legal needs to go
2262:
901:
900:
897:
896:
893:
892:
815:
814:
811:
810:
726:
725:
722:
721:
718:
717:
714:
713:
572:Add infoboxes to
535:Pre-Modern Aliyah
507:Sephardic Haredim
235:
234:
231:
230:
56:
55:
2773:
2619:
2575:
2553:. However, per
2551:reliable sources
2489:
2263:
2260:
2256:
2011:in general. Its
1274:
1269:
1258:
1253:
1242:
1215:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1106:
873:
872:
869:
866:
863:
842:
835:
834:
824:
817:
787:
786:
783:
780:
777:
756:
749:
748:
743:
735:
728:
523:Prisoner of Zion
464:Deletion sorting
378:
371:
370:
338:
312:
311:
308:
305:
302:
281:
276:
275:
274:
265:
258:
257:
252:
244:
237:
227:to this article.
179:
178:
175:
172:
169:
155:join the project
144:
142:Biography portal
139:
138:
137:
128:
121:
120:
115:
114:
113:
108:
97:
90:
73:
67:
66:
58:
44:this noticeboard
16:
2781:
2780:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2676:
2675:
2659:
2617:
2573:
2487:
2462:
2304:
2259:
2254:
2183:
2178:is the same as
2150:
1291:
1272:
1265:
1256:
1249:
1240:
1213:
1204:
1199:
1194:
1146:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1104:
1100:
906:
870:
867:
864:
861:
860:
784:
781:
778:
775:
774:
741:
710:
695:David Bar-Hayim
503:Rami Kleinstein
487:Ayala Procaccia
439:Participate in
369:
309:
306:
303:
300:
299:
277:
272:
270:
250:
176:
173:
170:
167:
166:
140:
135:
133:
109:
103:
74:on Knowledge's
71:
12:
11:
5:
2779:
2777:
2769:
2768:
2763:
2758:
2753:
2748:
2743:
2738:
2733:
2728:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2708:
2703:
2698:
2693:
2688:
2678:
2677:
2658:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2547:
2546:
2545:
2515:
2514:
2513:
2461:
2458:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2407:192.118.27.253
2395:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2342:
2341:
2303:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2214:
2213:
2158:
2149:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2083:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2048:
2045:
2044:
2040:
2039:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2017:192.118.27.253
2014:
2006:
2001:
1991:192.118.27.253
1983:
1973:192.118.27.253
1970:
1958:
1957:
1943:
1935:
1921:192.118.27.253
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1422:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1372:192.118.27.253
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1332:192.118.27.253
1290:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1263:
1247:
1225:192.118.27.253
1210:
1181:192.118.27.253
1169:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1116:142.105.159.60
1099:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1078:192.118.27.253
1040:192.118.27.253
1023:
1022:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
967:
966:
965:
964:
946:
945:
905:
902:
899:
898:
895:
894:
891:
890:
883:
877:
876:
874:
857:the discussion
843:
831:
830:
825:
813:
812:
809:
808:
801:Low-importance
797:
791:
790:
788:
771:the discussion
757:
745:
744:
742:Lowāimportance
736:
724:
723:
720:
719:
716:
715:
712:
711:
709:
708:
707:
706:
685:
677:
664:
647:
630:
617:
596:
579:
562:
545:
537:
476:
459:
446:
429:
407:
382:
380:
379:
368:
367:
362:
357:
352:
346:
343:
342:
334:
333:
326:Low-importance
322:
316:
315:
313:
296:the discussion
283:
282:
266:
254:
253:
251:Lowāimportance
245:
233:
232:
229:
228:
213:
203:
202:
193:
183:
182:
180:
146:
145:
129:
117:
116:
98:
86:
85:
79:
68:
54:
53:
49:this help page
33:poorly sourced
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2778:
2767:
2764:
2762:
2759:
2757:
2754:
2752:
2749:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2734:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2704:
2702:
2699:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2689:
2687:
2684:
2683:
2681:
2674:
2673:
2669:
2665:
2664:50.182.180.55
2640:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2623:
2622:
2620:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2601:50.182.180.55
2598:
2597:
2596:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2579:
2578:
2576:
2568:
2567:this sentence
2564:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2536:
2535:50.182.180.55
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2512:
2508:
2504:
2503:50.182.180.55
2500:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2493:
2492:
2490:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2459:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2416:
2412:
2408:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2368:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2331:50.182.180.55
2328:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2301:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2284:50.182.180.55
2281:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2267:
2264:
2257:
2251:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2215:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2181:
2180:User:TeeVeeed
2177:
2173:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2155:
2147:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2046:
2041:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2012:
2010:
2004:
2002:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1969:two different
1968:
1966:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1941:
1936:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1763:50.182.180.55
1760:
1756:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1701:50.182.180.55
1698:
1694:
1693:50.182.180.55
1690:
1686:
1682:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1579:50.182.180.55
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1499:50.182.180.55
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1462:50.182.180.55
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1423:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1288:
1278:
1275:
1268:
1264:
1262:
1259:
1252:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1216:
1207:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1149:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1097:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1001:
997:
985:
981:
977:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
963:
959:
955:
950:
949:
948:
947:
944:
940:
936:
932:
929:
926:
925:
924:
923:
919:
915:
911:
903:
888:
882:
879:
878:
875:
858:
854:
850:
849:
844:
841:
837:
836:
832:
829:
826:
823:
819:
806:
802:
796:
793:
792:
789:
776:Women writers
772:
768:
767:women writers
764:
763:
758:
755:
751:
750:
746:
740:
739:Women writers
737:
734:
730:
704:
700:
696:
693:
691:
687:
686:
684:
682:
678:
676:
673:
671:
670:
665:
662:
661:
656:
654:
653:
648:
645:
644:
639:
637:
636:
631:
629:
626:
624:
623:
618:
615:
614:
609:
605:
603:
602:
597:
594:
593:
588:
586:
585:
580:
577:
576:
571:
569:
568:
563:
560:
559:
554:
552:
551:
546:
543:
542:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
515:Nachum Heiman
512:
511:Zman Tel Aviv
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
485:
483:
482:
477:
474:
473:
468:
466:
465:
460:
458:
455:
453:
452:
447:
444:
443:
438:
436:
435:
430:
427:
423:
419:
416:
414:
413:
408:
405:
404:
399:
398:
393:
391:
390:
385:
384:
381:
377:
373:
372:
366:
363:
361:
358:
356:
353:
351:
348:
347:
345:
344:
340:
339:
335:
331:
327:
321:
318:
317:
314:
297:
293:
289:
288:
280:
279:Israel portal
269:
267:
264:
260:
259:
255:
249:
246:
243:
239:
226:
222:
218:
209:
205:
204:
200:
199:
189:
185:
184:
181:
164:
163:documentation
160:
156:
152:
151:
143:
132:
130:
127:
123:
122:
118:
107:
102:
99:
96:
92:
87:
83:
77:
69:
65:
60:
59:
51:
50:
45:
41:
37:
34:
30:
26:
25:
20:
18:
17:
2660:
2614:
2570:
2484:
2463:
2305:
2184:
2151:
1939:
1917:
1292:
1173:someone else
1101:
1073:
1030:
992:
907:
862:Jewish Women
853:Jewish Women
846:
828:Jewish Women
800:
760:
689:
688:
680:
679:
667:
666:
660:Israel stubs
658:
650:
649:
641:
633:
632:
620:
619:
611:
599:
598:
590:
582:
581:
573:
565:
564:
556:
548:
547:
539:
499:Levin Kipnis
479:
478:
470:
462:
461:
449:
448:
440:
432:
431:
410:
409:
401:
395:
387:
386:
325:
285:
220:
216:
196:
148:
82:WikiProjects
47:
35:
28:
22:
2164:Naomi Ragen
1267:Still wrong
434:Collaborate
2680:Categories
2278:How about
2156:, saying:
1177:reinstated
1054:plagiarism
703:Guy Oseary
495:Edna Arbel
221:photograph
2631:Debresser
2587:Debresser
2519:Debresser
2349:Debresser
2312:Debresser
2187:Debresser
2087:Debresser
1967:reverted
1947:Debresser
1821:Debresser
1630:Debresser
1537:Debresser
1460:nonsense.
1427:Debresser
1401:Debresser
1346:Debresser
1318:Debresser
1251:seems not
1159:Debresser
1059:Nil Einne
1031:copyright
996:Debresser
976:Debresser
935:Debresser
699:Guy Bavli
538:See also
394:Rate the
168:Biography
101:Biography
40:libellous
2618:itsJamie
2574:itsJamie
2559:WP:UNDUE
2488:itsJamie
2470:TeeVeeed
2438:TeeVeeed
2380:TeeVeeed
2372:TeeVeeed
2236:TeeVeeed
2232:WP:UNDUE
2203:TeeVeeed
2126:TeeVeeed
2118:WP:UNDUE
2058:TeeVeeed
2050:TeeVeeed
1881:TeeVeeed
1681:WP:UNDUE
1405:TeeVeeed
1299:TeeVeeed
1012:TeeVeeed
954:TeeVeeed
914:TeeVeeed
910:talkpage
584:Maintain
451:Copyedit
2327:WP:BLPN
2280:WP:BLPN
2013:alleged
1685:WP:NPOV
1254:though
803:on the
567:Infobox
412:Cleanup
355:history
328:on the
72:C-class
2555:WP:BLP
2308:WP:DRN
2302:WP:DRN
2223:WP:COI
2217:also.
2201:there.
2122:WP:BLP
2009:IP law
1759:WP:COI
1689:WP:BLP
1687:, and
1419:WP:BRD
1238:life.
701:, and
669:Update
481:Expand
389:Assess
301:Israel
292:Israel
248:Israel
78:scale.
2563:WP:RS
2255:/wiae
2154:WP:3O
1963:Your
1626:WP:3O
1273:pablo
1257:pablo
1241:pablo
1214:pablo
1147:pablo
1105:pablo
681:Other
652:Stubs
635:Photo
365:purge
360:watch
225:added
217:image
2668:talk
2635:talk
2616:OhNo
2605:talk
2591:talk
2572:OhNo
2557:and
2539:talk
2523:talk
2507:talk
2486:OhNo
2474:talk
2442:talk
2411:talk
2384:talk
2376:talk
2353:talk
2335:talk
2316:talk
2288:talk
2261:/tlk
2240:talk
2207:talk
2191:talk
2130:talk
2091:talk
2062:talk
2054:talk
2021:talk
1995:talk
1977:talk
1965:edit
1951:talk
1925:talk
1885:talk
1825:talk
1767:talk
1705:talk
1697:talk
1634:talk
1583:talk
1541:talk
1503:talk
1466:talk
1431:talk
1409:talk
1376:talk
1350:talk
1336:talk
1322:talk
1303:talk
1229:talk
1196:just
1185:talk
1163:talk
1131:just
1120:talk
1082:talk
1063:talk
1044:talk
1016:talk
1000:talk
980:talk
958:talk
939:talk
930:and
918:talk
657:See
622:NPOV
589:See
424:and
400:and
350:edit
157:and
2662:now
2007:of
1940:not
1206:few
1141:few
881:???
795:Low
601:Map
320:Low
223:be
219:or
29:BLP
2682::
2670:)
2637:)
2607:)
2593:)
2541:)
2525:)
2509:)
2476:)
2444:)
2413:)
2386:)
2355:)
2337:)
2318:)
2290:)
2242:)
2209:)
2193:)
2148:3O
2132:)
2093:)
2064:)
2023:)
1997:)
1989:.
1979:)
1953:)
1927:)
1887:)
1769:)
1707:)
1683:,
1636:)
1585:)
1543:)
1505:)
1468:)
1433:)
1411:)
1378:)
1352:)
1338:)
1324:)
1305:)
1231:)
1187:)
1165:)
1122:)
1084:)
1065:)
1046:)
1018:)
1002:)
982:)
960:)
941:)
920:)
697:,
533:,
529:,
525:,
521:,
517:,
513:,
509:,
505:,
501:,
497:,
493:,
489:,
104::
2666:(
2633:(
2603:(
2589:(
2537:(
2521:(
2505:(
2472:(
2440:(
2409:(
2382:(
2374:(
2351:(
2333:(
2314:(
2286:(
2238:(
2205:(
2189:(
2128:(
2089:(
2060:(
2052:(
2019:(
1993:(
1975:(
1949:(
1923:(
1883:(
1827:)
1823:(
1765:(
1703:(
1695:(
1632:(
1581:(
1539:(
1501:(
1464:(
1429:(
1421:.
1407:(
1382:)
1374:(
1348:(
1334:(
1320:(
1301:(
1227:(
1201:a
1183:(
1161:(
1136:a
1118:(
1080:(
1061:(
1042:(
1014:(
998:(
978:(
956:(
937:(
916:(
889:.
807:.
705:.
692::
683::
672::
663:.
655::
646:.
638::
625::
616:.
604::
595:.
587::
578:.
570::
561:.
553::
544:.
484::
475:.
467::
454::
445:.
437::
428:.
415::
406:.
392::
332:.
201:.
165:.
84::
52:.
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
