270:
252:
176:
158:
363:
186:
74:
53:
84:
22:
683:
CEO Christian Mihr warned that the methods are reminiscent of autocratic states and the law creates the danger of abuse. Totalitarian governments would also follow the debate in
Germany with interest at present to follow the draft and stated that a precedent for censorship must not be set. Meanwhile,
644:
This article includes various harsh criticism of this Act which are unsourced. Even if they are sourced, they would, in their current form, push a strong POV against this Act as there is a lack of an opposing viewpoint in support of the law. I have removed the following criticisms. Please note that
742:
Experts expect the short and rigid deletion periods and the high threat of fines to lead the networks to prefer to remove contributions in case of doubt, even if the freedom of expression guaranteed by fundamental rights would require a context-related consideration, such as in the differentiation
743:
between prohibited insult and permitted satire. In April 2017, an alliance of business associations, network politicians, civil rights activists, scientists and lawyers joined forces to protest against the law. In a manifesto, they warned of "catastrophic consequences for freedom of expression".
705:
on online platforms. Anyone wishing to assert legal claims against a user should be able to demand the surrender of data from which the identity of the claimant can be deduced. If "for example, a person or company feels offended or inappropriately criticized by a comment in an
670:
At a hearing on the bill in the
Bundestag, eight of the ten invited experts expressed considerable concern; most of them saw a threat to freedom of expression. Bernd Holznagel, head of the Institute for Information, Telecommunications and Media Law at the
645:
the burden to demonstrating verifiability lies with the editor who adds the material as per WP:PROVEIT. I believe these criticisms should not be restored until they are cited, and from the talk page, it seems they have been left as-is for over a year.
381:
485:
Nothing is clearly illegal, not even for 115 years old judges. They need 3 years of research for almost everything, so this is just a fascist claim to legalise something massively illegal to the
Grundgesetz freespeech paragraph
620:
I agree. The article clearly and obviously pushed a negative POV, and more worryingly, has large swathes of controversial but uncited claims. I think we should delete the unsourced criticism as it violates WP:NPOV.
534:
Could you please add sources? It's much more difficult for the average editor to find citations for your claims that you yourself. Without citations, these claims are unverified and should eventually be deleted.
493:
839:) warned against pushing large network providers into the role of judges. The scientific services of the Bundestag expressed concerns in an expert opinion that the bill violates the
906:
310:
450:
694:
had already referred to
Justice Minister Heiko Maas in his fight against the opposition in restricting freedom of expression, and he justified his own measures by Maas's bill.
675:, explained that to avoid high fines, networks may also tend to delete legal contributions; the draft was thus called unconstitutional and unable to withstand a review by the
722:. According to the IT lawyer Joerg Heidrich, anyone who gives a bad rating there must expect "expensive letters from lawyers". According to net activists, the draft would
710:, they could in future not only demand that the comment be deleted from the forum operator, but also that master data be issued in order to warn the author and demand a
412:
316:
497:
911:
399:
840:
426:
395:
437:
286:
901:
891:
876:
228:
140:
130:
574:
There is an article in The
Economist that might be worth using. January 13th 2018, "Freedom and its discontents," pp. 21~22 (no author given).
277:
257:
881:
234:
106:
896:
871:
388:
754:
886:
97:
58:
676:
406:
375:
33:
757:
uses the term "censorship" in connection with socio-political contributions by an artist that were deleted by
Facebook.
727:
680:
199:
163:
769:
wrote: "This confirms the suspicion that the law violates EU law, but
Brussels does not want to offend Germany".
765:
According to a regulation issued in 2001, the EU Commission must make internal documents available on request.
672:
747:
526:
203:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
714:
declaration". According to critics, that would affect not only social networks but also platforms such as
686:
39:
269:
251:
836:
801:
691:
512:
I've just translated it 1to1 from German. If you have time, please help me with adding the sources.--
489:
21:
832:
776:
has also criticised the
Network Enforcement Act as a source of annoyance to the German government.
606:
285:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
852:
844:
828:
809:
781:
750:, among others, not to sign the law because freedom of expression was not sufficiently protected.
650:
626:
579:
540:
513:
773:
746:
After the Bundestag passed the law, the German Association of Journalists called on President
610:
792:
715:
711:
702:
698:
560:
707:
419:
362:
89:
865:
848:
805:
797:
777:
646:
622:
575:
536:
856:
813:
785:
654:
630:
614:
583:
564:
544:
528:
501:
282:
175:
157:
824:
800:
in pure culture" and explained that the draft law reads as if "it came from the
185:
731:
556:
191:
181:
79:
73:
52:
605:
Hence I think there should be other opinions as well to balance the article.
831:) warned against serious collateral damage to the freedom of expression.
804:" that it was an "attack on the principle of the separation of powers".
441:
102:
444:
to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
596:
You clearly get a very bad opinion over the NetzDG by reading it.
719:
790:
More Unsourced criticism: Harald Martenstein of the newspaper
204:
15:
602:
Tbh. I question the intellect of someone who says that.
351:
346:
341:
336:
451:
Category:Internet culture articles needing attention
281:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
315:This article has not yet received a rating on the
233:This article has not yet received a rating on the
413:Category:Internet culture articles needing images
734:contrary to constitutional and European law."
8:
907:Unknown-importance Internet culture articles
738:Criticism/Journalists and journalist groups:
382:View all requested internet culture articles
438:Category:Internet self-classification codes
487:
370:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
324:
246:
152:
47:
697:The new law aims to facilitate enforcing
248:
154:
49:
19:
555:There are 3 sections with criticism.
295:Knowledge:WikiProject Internet culture
912:WikiProject Internet culture articles
494:2003:DC:CF37:1500:25D7:A913:D965:B70D
298:Template:WikiProject Internet culture
7:
275:This article is within the scope of
197:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
328:WikiProject Internet culture To-do:
207:and the subjects encompassed by it.
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
902:C-Class Internet culture articles
730:". Critics saw "an instrument of
593:This article is very one sided.
361:
268:
250:
184:
174:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
892:Unknown-importance law articles
877:Mid-importance Germany articles
637:Unsourced criticism of this Act
135:This article has been rated as
761:Criticism/European Commissions
755:Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
1:
690:report, Belarusian President
615:11:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
584:13:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
565:06:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
289:and see a list of open tasks.
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Germany
109:and see a list of open tasks.
882:WikiProject Germany articles
857:03:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
814:02:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
677:Federal Constitutional Court
278:WikiProject Internet culture
118:Template:WikiProject Germany
786:01:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
655:01:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
631:01:06, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
599:Violating human rights....
545:01:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
928:
317:project's importance scale
235:project's importance scale
141:project's importance scale
728:anonymity on the Internet
681:Reporters Without Borders
529:12:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
323:
314:
301:Internet culture articles
263:
232:
213:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
169:
134:
67:
46:
897:WikiProject Law articles
872:C-Class Germany articles
772:EU Justice Commissioner
666:Draft law and reactions:
502:14:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
216:Template:WikiProject Law
748:Frank-Walter Steinmeier
425:All stubs are located
28:This article is rated
687:Augsburger Allgemeine
673:University of Münster
394:Pick an article from
887:C-Class law articles
820:Advice and Adoption:
726:lead "to the end of
692:Alexander Lukashenko
661:Unsourced Criticism:
841:German constitution
833:Konstantin von Notz
98:WikiProject Germany
845:European Union law
641:Dear Wikipedians,
34:content assessment
504:
492:comment added by
478:
477:
474:
473:
470:
469:
466:
465:
462:
461:
440:(!?); Try to get
245:
244:
241:
240:
151:
150:
147:
146:
919:
793:Der Tagesspiegel
767:Wirtschaftswoche
712:cease and desist
684:according to an
524:
523:
520:
517:
376:Article requests
365:
358:
357:
325:
303:
302:
299:
296:
293:
292:Internet culture
283:internet culture
272:
265:
264:
258:Internet culture
254:
247:
221:
220:
217:
214:
211:
194:
189:
188:
178:
171:
170:
160:
153:
123:
122:
121:Germany articles
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
927:
926:
922:
921:
920:
918:
917:
916:
862:
861:
703:property rights
699:personal rights
639:
591:
572:
553:
521:
518:
515:
514:
510:
483:
481:Clearly illegal
458:
356:
300:
297:
294:
291:
290:
218:
215:
212:
209:
208:
200:WikiProject Law
190:
183:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
925:
923:
915:
914:
909:
904:
899:
894:
889:
884:
879:
874:
864:
863:
860:
859:
822:
816:
788:
770:
763:
758:
751:
744:
740:
735:
708:Internet forum
695:
668:
663:
638:
635:
634:
633:
590:
587:
571:
568:
552:
549:
548:
547:
509:
506:
482:
479:
476:
475:
472:
471:
468:
467:
464:
463:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
454:
445:
429:
415:
402:
384:
369:
367:
366:
355:
354:
349:
344:
339:
333:
330:
329:
321:
320:
313:
307:
306:
304:
287:the discussion
273:
261:
260:
255:
243:
242:
239:
238:
231:
225:
224:
222:
196:
195:
179:
167:
166:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Mid-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
90:Germany portal
77:
65:
64:
62:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
924:
913:
910:
908:
905:
903:
900:
898:
895:
893:
890:
888:
885:
883:
880:
878:
875:
873:
870:
869:
867:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
823:
821:
817:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
794:
789:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
768:
764:
762:
759:
756:
752:
749:
745:
741:
739:
736:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
704:
700:
696:
693:
689:
688:
682:
678:
674:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
642:
636:
632:
628:
624:
619:
618:
617:
616:
612:
608:
603:
600:
597:
594:
588:
586:
585:
581:
577:
570:The Economist
569:
567:
566:
562:
558:
550:
546:
542:
538:
533:
532:
531:
530:
527:
525:
507:
505:
503:
499:
495:
491:
480:
453:
452:
447:
446:
443:
439:
436:
434:
430:
428:
424:
422:
421:
416:
414:
411:
409:
408:
403:
401:
397:
393:
391:
390:
385:
383:
380:
378:
377:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
359:
353:
350:
348:
345:
343:
340:
338:
335:
334:
332:
331:
327:
326:
322:
318:
312:
309:
308:
305:
288:
284:
280:
279:
274:
271:
267:
266:
262:
259:
256:
253:
249:
236:
230:
227:
226:
223:
206:
202:
201:
193:
187:
182:
180:
177:
173:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
819:
791:
774:Věra Jourová
766:
760:
737:
723:
685:
665:
660:
643:
640:
604:
601:
598:
595:
592:
573:
554:
511:
488:— Preceding
484:
448:
432:
431:
418:
417:
405:
404:
387:
386:
374:
373:
276:
219:law articles
198:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
825:Petra Sitte
796:called it "
205:legal field
866:Categories
837:The Greens
802:1984 novel
798:Erdoğanism
732:censorship
192:Law portal
589:One sided
449:See also
849:Harry585
829:The Left
806:Harry585
778:Harry585
724:de facto
647:Harry585
623:Harry585
576:Kdammers
537:Harry585
490:unsigned
607:Grgurel
551:Cleanup
508:Sources
442:YouTube
342:history
139:on the
112:Germany
103:Germany
59:Germany
30:C-class
818:Under
716:Amazon
389:Expand
36:scale.
557:Zezen
433:Other
420:Stubs
407:Photo
352:purge
347:watch
853:talk
843:and
810:talk
782:talk
753:The
720:eBay
701:and
651:talk
627:talk
611:talk
580:talk
561:talk
541:talk
498:talk
427:here
400:here
396:here
337:edit
718:or
398:or
311:???
229:???
210:Law
164:Law
131:Mid
868::
855:)
847:.
812:)
784:)
679:.
653:)
629:)
613:)
582:)
563:)
543:)
500:)
851:(
835:(
827:(
808:(
780:(
649:(
625:(
609:(
578:(
559:(
539:(
522:S
519:P
516:A
496:(
435::
423::
410::
392::
379::
319:.
237:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
