334:
313:
639:
successes and failures, and anything else. I think the article is certainly notable enough to warrant its existence: there are plenty of books on New Labour itself, and many more books on the Labour Party which dedicate significant attention to it. While I agree that New Labour was a branding of the party, it also marked a significant change in
British politics, giving success to the Labour party and drastically changing its whole political philosophy. New Labour is discussed elsewhere (
423:
402:
433:
647:); however, those sections do not go into a lot of detail (because they are only sections in an article). I think that the sources we have more than justify the existence of a separate article, because New Labour is widely discussed as its own phenomenon, separate from the rest of the Labour Party. I would more than welcome anyone who wishes to help expand this article - I know more than anyone else that there is much more work to be done.
229:
208:
239:
21:
177:
107:
528:
507:
538:
882:
Whether it's correct to say "New Labour" or "New Labour Era" is something I'm not sure about. There were certainly plenty of column inches written on the issue, particularly around the time of the 2010 general election arguing that it spelled the death of New Labour, so perhaps it is correct to say it was an era.
696:"and 60 000 demonstrated in Manchester before the Labour Party Conference, with the issues including British occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan" I'm confused about "with the issues", does that refer to the issues that brought the demonstrators there, or the issues being discussed inside the conference?
881:
You raise an interesting point. New Labour as an ideology still exists, although those who now lead the party have dropped it as their political ethos. Ed
Miliband now talks about "One Nation Labour", but there are still many on the right of the party who regard themselves as advocates of New Labour.
747:
Thanks for that review, I appreciate it. I've made all the changes that you've suggested (except for the Gordon Brown one, because he was not just important because of his contribution to the Third Way, and using 'because' would suggest that he was. I've been meaning to write a reception section for
691:
Interesting topic for an article, looks like it is in decent shape thus far. I've made some copyedits and I'll leave some more suggestions here for now. The article looks good, the one thing that really seems to be missing is descriptions of how academics and commentators have described New Labour.
620:
article. I think if this article is to exist it needs to focus on the branding more than policies and history. This means it's going to remain a stub. I expect other users will question whether this article needs to exist at all, given that this information could possibly be incorporated fully into
1540:
In each of these, you present a fact, reference it, and then provide some sort of evaluative comment. Do these comments come from the references, or are they your own opinions? If the former, then the reference should be moved to the end of the sentence. If the latter, then the comments need to be
1118:
Another concern I had was the editor who added the paragraph has a bit of a history of dubious sourcing. That sort of thing can present problems if it goes unchecked. I guess there should be plenty of refs about discussing
Kinnock's attempts to rebrand the party, so adding something should be easy
1104:
I support what you've done there. The electoral support section is about how New Labour attempted to widen its electoral support. The fact that this was influenced by
Kinnock is relevant; the successes/failures of Kinnock is not. I'm happy with mentioning that Kinnock had tried it before (we might
638:
Hi Peter, thanks for your comments and improvements. I agree that there is much more that needs to be added to this article - I started with the history simply because I personally find it the easiest place to start from. I intend to add sections on their political philosophy, critics, electoral
988:
category. Generally sources should discuss the main topic, and anything relating to it should be discussed in that context. While the sources provide some background to the pre-New Labour era they don't actually do so with reference to that subject. I can't help thinking this paragraph would be
624:
I can see however that when the article with this name was previously redirected "New Labour" was a current branding and the party was in power. Now that the New Labour branding has been dropped this article may have some purpose. But I wanted to raise this issue to the main editor(s) of this
1761:. I had a second read through and agreed that it was a little bloated. I've removed some material, and moved some material further down into the article. I think what remains has the right level of detail and is written in the summary style appropriate for an introduction. What do you think?
792:
The placement in the article is a little awkward too, since we have the Blair image near the top and the Brown image near the bottom and that gives the impression of an organised article. I think it would be better to have both images grouped together, but then crowding would be an issue.
1505:
History section: "During the period from 1994 to 1997, after Blair's election as party leader, Labour managed to reverse decades of decline in party membership by increasing the number by around 40%, increasing its capacity to compete for office, whilst also legitimising the leadership of
1536:, defected to the Labour Party, stating "I joined New Labour because that was obviously the New Conservative party", underlining the significant ideological shifts that had taken place, and indicating why the reception of New Labour was negative amongst traditional left-wing supporters."
1264:
ideology. While One Nation Labour should be mentioned in the context of New Labour's successor, I have concerns about the neutrality of the edits I've reverted, and we should do our best to keep this article balanced, and maintain the GA quality. Any thoughts?
993:
article, where there would be no problem. As this has been assessed as a good article we need to keep it in shape. If we can find a better source that discusses all of the above then the information can be included, but I'll take it out for now.
1349:
An IP user has been attempting to add a table of what looks like all the ministers of Labour at a certain unspecified point in time. I have removed this - it is much better covered where it currently is in the articles
1545:, which means that any conclusions you come to in the article must be the reflected in the sources and not just your own thinking (in this regard, writing Knowledge articles is different to writing university essays).
867:
This article seems to confuse the "New Labour Era" with "New Labour". The era of New Labour
Government may have ended but people are still refered to as having a New Labour allegiance and New Labour is not the era.
712:, Gordon Brown's press officer, was often in conflict with Campbell because of his attempts to brief the press by his own initiatives; this continued until his resignation in 1999." Who does the "his" refer to here?
1501:, thanks for your recent edits to this article - they are much appreciated. I just had a couple of questions regarding some souring. There are three points where you added a source half way through a sentence:
1833:
374:
1808:
384:
725:"New Labour tended to place more emphasis on social justice than equality, as previous Labour governments had done" I'm a little confused here, which did previous Labour governments place emphasis on?
785:
I question whether there needs to be an image of Brown on this page. If we have one image of Brown then that opens the floodgates for images of every other person listed. While Blair is undeniably
1828:
350:
897:
Era or Error? For might not the article reflect the view of many true Labour supporters that the Tory-lite ideas of New Labour should have been consigned to the
Dustbin of History?
806:
I don't mind either way. It might be useful to have an image of Brown, so that we have a picture of New Labour's two leaders. Still, if you want to remove it, I won't complain.
341:
318:
32:
978:
oversaw at the previous two elections. Kinnock then resigned as leader to be succeeded by John Smith,who died in May 1994 and was succeeded by Tony Blair two months later.
1803:
1683:
1632:
719:
philosophy." Is he important because he played a key role in the third way philosophy? The use of "and" leaves open the possibility that these aren't cause and effect.
1843:
796:
I think in this case simple is better. I'm not going to argue strongly for the removal of the Brown image, but I do feel the article would be better without it. --
489:
479:
1525:
indicating that the electorate viewed Labour as more moderate and electable in 1992 than in 1987, arguably legitimising the arguments for increased modernisation."
1439:
1435:
1421:
661:
respect did New Labour give lasting "success to the Labour party"? And, given how New Labour lacks any history, real ideas or grounding in political philosophy -
702:
In the third paragraph of "History" you use "protest" "prompted" and "demonstrate" quite a bit, see if there's a good way to cut down on the use of these words.
1848:
1529:
115:
1858:
584:
594:
1407:
1838:
1818:
455:
295:
285:
789:
key figure of "New Labour", Brown less so. We have Blair saying that New Labour stopped as when he left, and many see Brown as a lurch backwards.
1863:
1823:
963:
959:
943:
333:
312:
1853:
1514:
1510:
904:
672:
560:
446:
407:
132:
1813:
849:
640:
617:
261:
50:
1397:
1679:
1656:
1628:
1605:
1417:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1798:
1744:
Hi, the intro just seems to make the article a bit "top-heavy" IMO. The paragraphs are quite long and not very easily readable.
551:
512:
159:
38:
1725:- could you please explain in more detail why you think it is too long? The lead in the article is three paragraphs long and
346:
252:
213:
1559:"How to win a landslide by really trying: the effects of local campaigning on voting in the 1997 British general election"
848:, a text-to-speech programme which provides access to Knowledge articles, doesn't recognise the search term "New Labour".
1482:
1363:
947:
188:
155:
1085:
1022:
1408:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150221003420/http://clients.squareeye.net/uploads/compass/documents/New%20Politics.pdf
715:"Gordon Brown was an important figure in Blair's Labour government and played a key role in developing the party's
1226:
923:
Just need to check the following paragraph for accuracy, so am posting it here for easier access to sources, etc.
1270:
1124:
999:
928:
887:
830:
1438:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1064:
1043:
908:
763:
up to FA once you need a peer review or advice on the article, that article has a bit about New Labour in it.
676:
1498:
962:, Kinnock managed to cut into the Conservative majority as well as weaken the challenge from the Alliance,In
853:
825:
redirect to Ed
Miliband, but there seems plenty of stuff around that we could use for a stand alone article.
1473:
1411:
1389:
1359:
1719:
1385:
1307:
1287:
1280:
1457:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1445:
967:
768:
736:
438:
194:
125:
20:
1388:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
731:
There are some long sentences in the lead, you should probably try to break them up or trim them down.
1266:
1120:
995:
951:
924:
900:
883:
826:
716:
692:
i.e. "Christopher
Hitchens said that New Labour was the best thing since sliced bread" or something.
668:
106:
90:
1729:
recommends no more than four. Are there any specific parts which you think could be more concise?
1398:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120625025947/http://www.labour.org.uk/history_of_the_labour_party_gb
974:
was now left with a 21-seat majority compared to the triple-digit landslides that his predecessor
559:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
454:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
349:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
260:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1673:
1622:
1334:
1316:
1163:
955:
1442:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1458:
1105:
briefly mention to what extent he was successful); we don't need a great deal of detail on it.
1662:
1653:
1611:
1602:
1578:
1295:
1261:
990:
975:
822:
644:
42:
1570:
764:
732:
543:
422:
401:
1509:
Political branding section: "Kinnock undertook the first wave of modernisation between the
1465:
1260:
significant changes to this article by an anonymous editor who appears to want to push the
1401:
1176:
872:
244:
1766:
1734:
1698:
1424:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1355:
1351:
1143:
722:
There are a few times that you could probably just put "Blair" instead of "Tony Blair".
709:
451:
1574:
1464:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
757:
You're welcome, this was a fun article to read. BTW, you should ping whomever brought
238:
228:
207:
1792:
1518:
1330:
1312:
1106:
845:
807:
749:
648:
629:
1558:
1542:
1522:
1291:
985:
1195:
1431:
1311:-- Conservative election slogan". I'll see if I can find out how to make them.
1776:
1758:
1745:
1712:
1533:
1430:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1381:
971:
869:
797:
533:
428:
234:
148:
143:
1665:
1614:
1581:
1762:
1730:
1694:
1305:
How about one of those little quote boxes? It need only say something like "
759:
556:
119:
1245:
Biography of Kinnock crediting him as having sown the seeds for New Labour
942:
He had taken over as party leader in October 1983, just after the party's
1726:
1412:
http://clients.squareeye.net/uploads/compass/documents/New%20Politics.pdf
257:
821:
Anyone want to start an article about One Nation Labour? I've created a
537:
527:
506:
1187:
Article discusses some of the changes Kinnock made to the Labour Party
946:
and two years after the right wing of the party had split to form the
1647:
1596:
1286:
I don't know where best to add it, but we should definitely link to "
966:, the Conservatives managed to remain in government in spite of the
616:
I've added a little information to the lead, mostly taken from the
1779:
1770:
1748:
1738:
1702:
1487:
1367:
1338:
1320:
1299:
1274:
1128:
1109:
1003:
932:
912:
891:
875:
857:
834:
810:
800:
772:
752:
740:
680:
651:
632:
628:
Well, hopefully this article can be expanded a little further! --
699:"US strikes on Afghanistan in 1998" Probably want to link this.
728:
The word "Need" is used a lot in the "Social Justice" section.
170:
1023:"BBC ON THIS DAY | 9 | 1983: Thatcher wins landslide victory"
984:
There is a danger at least some of this could fall into the
1517:
general elections, with quantitative research conducted by
1392:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
450:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1834:
High-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
1402:
http://www.labour.org.uk/history_of_the_labour_party_gb
1257:
83:
1809:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are good articles
1595:
Heath, Anthony. Jowell, Roger, Curtice, John. (1994).
705:
In Political Branding "government" is repeated a lot.
1598:
Labour's last chance? : the 1992 election and beyond
555:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
359:
Knowledge:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
345:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
256:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1434:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1086:"BBC ON THIS DAY | 21 | 1994: Labour chooses Blair"
362:
Template:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
1541:removed entirely - Knowledge has a policy against
1119:enough. I'll take a look and see what I can find.
970:and rising unemployment, although prime minister
1829:GA-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
1649:Leading labour : from Keir Hardie to Tony Blair
1218:Discusses Kinnock's efforts to modernise Labour
1420:This message was posted before February 2018.
48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
8:
1646:Rentoul, John. ed. Jefferys, Kevin. (1999).
1682:) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
1631:) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
898:
748:a little while; I'll try to do that soon.
666:
501:
396:
342:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom
307:
202:
62:
15:
1804:Social sciences and society good articles
1380:I have just modified 2 external links on
665:could make useful changes to the Party?
33:Social sciences and society good articles
1715:, you recently tagged this article with
1549:
1014:
503:
398:
365:Politics of the United Kingdom articles
309:
204:
1844:Mid-importance United Kingdom articles
1775:Thank you for the edit, looks good. --
1671:
1620:
1172:
1161:
1150:. News International. 6 September 2002
625:article, just so you can expect this.
1601:. Aldershot: Dartmouth. pp. 191–213.
944:worst postwar general election result
7:
549:This article is within the scope of
464:Knowledge:WikiProject United Kingdom
444:This article is within the scope of
339:This article is within the scope of
250:This article is within the scope of
176:
174:
1849:WikiProject United Kingdom articles
618:History of the British Labour Party
467:Template:WikiProject United Kingdom
193:It is of interest to the following
1859:High-importance socialism articles
1528:Reception section: " For example,
1171:Cite has empty unknown parameter:
14:
1384:. Please take a moment to review
41:. If you can improve it further,
1839:GA-Class United Kingdom articles
1819:Mid-importance politics articles
1252:Reversion of significant changes
536:
526:
505:
431:
421:
400:
332:
311:
237:
227:
206:
175:
105:
19:
1557:Whiteley, P.; Seyd, P. (2003).
589:This article has been rated as
569:Knowledge:WikiProject Socialism
484:This article has been rated as
379:This article has been rated as
290:This article has been rated as
141:Did you know ... that the term
1864:WikiProject Socialism articles
1368:11:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
1339:17:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
913:19:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
811:14:50, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
801:20:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
681:19:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
572:Template:WikiProject Socialism
356:Politics of the United Kingdom
347:Politics of the United Kingdom
319:Politics of the United Kingdom
270:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
1824:WikiProject Politics articles
1678:: CS1 maint: date and year (
1627:: CS1 maint: date and year (
1575:10.1016/s0261-3794(02)00017-3
892:15:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
876:09:43, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
563:and see a list of open tasks.
458:and see a list of open tasks.
353:and see a list of open tasks.
273:Template:WikiProject Politics
264:and see a list of open tasks.
1780:17:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
1771:14:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
1749:12:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
1739:11:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
1703:15:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
1488:06:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
858:13:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
835:12:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
158:, following his election as
1854:GA-Class socialism articles
139:The text of the entry was:
1880:
1814:GA-Class politics articles
1652:. London: Tauris. p. 209.
1451:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1377:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1144:"Defence of Welsh windbag"
1129:17:12, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
1110:14:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
1004:12:55, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
989:better placed in the main
950:, which in turn formed an
933:12:38, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
595:project's importance scale
490:project's importance scale
447:WikiProject United Kingdom
385:project's importance scale
296:project's importance scale
160:leader of the Labour Party
1275:16:53, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
781:Inclusion of Brown image?
773:20:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
753:20:07, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
741:21:30, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
652:14:41, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
633:12:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
588:
521:
483:
416:
378:
327:
289:
222:
201:
65:
61:
1532:, the proprietor of the
1321:03:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
1300:23:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
1196:"The road to New Labour"
919:Paragraph needs checking
118:appeared on Knowledge's
1799:Knowledge good articles
1757:Thanks for your reply,
1373:External links modified
948:Social Democratic Party
612:Purpose of this article
470:United Kingdom articles
156:Labour Party conference
1308:New Labour, New Danger
1288:New Labour, New Danger
1281:New Labour, New Danger
1148:Times Higher Education
1009:Footnotes on this page
183:This article is rated
116:fact from this article
552:WikiProject Socialism
439:United Kingdom portal
39:good article criteria
1432:regular verification
253:WikiProject Politics
91:Good article nominee
1422:After February 2018
844:Would you believe,
621:the main article.
1499:JudeBellinghamBCFC
1476:InternetArchiveBot
1427:InternetArchiveBot
1360:Absolutelypuremilk
1345:Table of ministers
1256:Twice today, I've
1229:. BBC. August 2009
575:socialism articles
189:content assessment
162:earlier that year?
66:Article milestones
1563:Electoral Studies
1543:original research
1452:
1262:One Nation Labour
1065:"BBC Politics 97"
1044:"BBC Politics 97"
986:original research
976:Margaret Thatcher
915:
903:comment added by
823:One Nation Labour
817:One Nation Labour
683:
671:comment added by
609:
608:
605:
604:
601:
600:
500:
499:
496:
495:
395:
394:
391:
390:
306:
305:
302:
301:
276:politics articles
169:
168:
100:
99:
84:September 3, 2012
57:
1871:
1724:
1718:
1688:
1687:
1677:
1669:
1643:
1637:
1636:
1626:
1618:
1592:
1586:
1585:
1554:
1486:
1477:
1450:
1449:
1428:
1238:
1236:
1234:
1211:
1209:
1207:
1180:
1174:
1169:
1167:
1159:
1157:
1155:
1097:
1096:
1094:
1093:
1082:
1076:
1075:
1073:
1072:
1061:
1055:
1054:
1052:
1051:
1040:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1030:
1019:
863:"New Labour Era"
577:
576:
573:
570:
567:
546:
544:Socialism portal
541:
540:
530:
523:
522:
517:
509:
502:
472:
471:
468:
465:
462:
441:
436:
435:
434:
425:
418:
417:
412:
404:
397:
367:
366:
363:
360:
357:
336:
329:
328:
323:
315:
308:
278:
277:
274:
271:
268:
247:
242:
241:
231:
224:
223:
218:
210:
203:
186:
180:
179:
178:
171:
154:
109:
86:
63:
46:
23:
16:
1879:
1878:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1789:
1788:
1722:
1716:
1710:
1692:
1691:
1670:
1659:
1645:
1644:
1640:
1619:
1608:
1594:
1593:
1589:
1556:
1555:
1551:
1530:Lord Rothermere
1495:
1480:
1475:
1443:
1436:have permission
1426:
1390:this simple FaQ
1375:
1347:
1284:
1267:Paul MacDermott
1254:
1232:
1230:
1225:
1205:
1203:
1200:Socialism Today
1194:
1170:
1160:
1153:
1151:
1142:
1139:
1121:Paul MacDermott
1101:
1100:
1091:
1089:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1070:
1068:
1063:
1062:
1058:
1049:
1047:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1028:
1026:
1021:
1020:
1016:
996:Paul MacDermott
938:Content follows
925:Paul MacDermott
921:
884:Paul MacDermott
865:
842:
827:Paul MacDermott
819:
783:
689:
614:
591:High-importance
574:
571:
568:
565:
564:
542:
535:
516:High‑importance
515:
469:
466:
463:
460:
459:
437:
432:
430:
410:
381:High-importance
364:
361:
358:
355:
354:
322:High‑importance
321:
275:
272:
269:
266:
265:
245:Politics portal
243:
236:
216:
187:on Knowledge's
184:
165:
164:
152:
137:
82:
12:
11:
5:
1877:
1875:
1867:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1791:
1790:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1752:
1751:
1709:
1708:Lead too long?
1706:
1690:
1689:
1657:
1638:
1606:
1587:
1548:
1547:
1538:
1537:
1526:
1507:
1494:
1493:Recent changes
1491:
1470:
1469:
1462:
1415:
1414:
1406:Added archive
1404:
1396:Added archive
1374:
1371:
1356:Brown ministry
1352:Blair ministry
1346:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1323:
1283:
1278:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1240:
1239:
1227:"Neil Kinnock"
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1213:
1212:
1202:. October 2010
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1182:
1181:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1113:
1112:
1099:
1098:
1077:
1056:
1035:
1013:
1012:
920:
917:
905:95.149.166.146
895:
894:
864:
861:
841:
838:
818:
815:
814:
813:
782:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
744:
743:
729:
726:
723:
720:
713:
710:Charlie Whelan
706:
703:
700:
697:
688:
685:
673:95.149.166.146
657:Sorry, but in
655:
654:
613:
610:
607:
606:
603:
602:
599:
598:
587:
581:
580:
578:
561:the discussion
548:
547:
531:
519:
518:
510:
498:
497:
494:
493:
486:Mid-importance
482:
476:
475:
473:
461:United Kingdom
456:the discussion
452:United Kingdom
443:
442:
426:
414:
413:
411:Mid‑importance
408:United Kingdom
405:
393:
392:
389:
388:
377:
371:
370:
368:
351:the discussion
337:
325:
324:
316:
304:
303:
300:
299:
292:Mid-importance
288:
282:
281:
279:
262:the discussion
249:
248:
232:
220:
219:
217:Mid‑importance
211:
199:
198:
192:
181:
167:
166:
147:was coined by
138:
113:
112:
110:
102:
101:
98:
97:
94:
87:
79:
78:
75:
72:
68:
67:
59:
58:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1876:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1796:
1794:
1781:
1778:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1750:
1747:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1721:
1720:lead too long
1714:
1707:
1705:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1685:
1681:
1675:
1667:
1664:
1660:
1658:1-86064-453-8
1655:
1651:
1650:
1642:
1639:
1634:
1630:
1624:
1616:
1613:
1609:
1607:1-85521-477-6
1604:
1600:
1599:
1591:
1588:
1583:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1553:
1550:
1546:
1544:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1524:
1520:
1519:Anthony Heath
1516:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1500:
1492:
1490:
1489:
1484:
1479:
1478:
1467:
1463:
1460:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1447:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1378:
1372:
1370:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1290:" from here.
1289:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1263:
1259:
1251:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1178:
1165:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1140:
1136:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1103:
1102:
1087:
1081:
1078:
1066:
1060:
1057:
1045:
1039:
1036:
1024:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1006:
1005:
1001:
997:
992:
987:
983:
979:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
956:Liberal Party
953:
949:
945:
940:
939:
935:
934:
930:
926:
918:
916:
914:
910:
906:
902:
893:
889:
885:
880:
879:
878:
877:
874:
871:
862:
860:
859:
855:
851:
850:86.135.227.51
847:
846:Kurzweil 1000
840:Kurzweil 1000
839:
837:
836:
832:
828:
824:
816:
812:
809:
805:
804:
803:
802:
799:
794:
790:
788:
780:
774:
770:
766:
762:
761:
756:
755:
754:
751:
746:
745:
742:
738:
734:
730:
727:
724:
721:
718:
714:
711:
707:
704:
701:
698:
695:
694:
693:
686:
684:
682:
678:
674:
670:
664:
660:
653:
650:
646:
642:
637:
636:
635:
634:
631:
626:
622:
619:
611:
596:
592:
586:
583:
582:
579:
562:
558:
554:
553:
545:
539:
534:
532:
529:
525:
524:
520:
514:
511:
508:
504:
491:
487:
481:
478:
477:
474:
457:
453:
449:
448:
440:
429:
427:
424:
420:
419:
415:
409:
406:
403:
399:
386:
382:
376:
373:
372:
369:
352:
348:
344:
343:
338:
335:
331:
330:
326:
320:
317:
314:
310:
297:
293:
287:
284:
283:
280:
263:
259:
255:
254:
246:
240:
235:
233:
230:
226:
225:
221:
215:
212:
209:
205:
200:
196:
190:
182:
173:
172:
163:
161:
157:
150:
146:
145:
135:
134:
133:June 25, 2012
129:
127:
126:Did you know?
121:
117:
111:
108:
104:
103:
95:
93:
92:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
73:
70:
69:
64:
60:
55:
53:
52:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1711:
1693:
1648:
1641:
1597:
1590:
1566:
1562:
1552:
1539:
1523:Roger Jowell
1496:
1474:
1471:
1446:source check
1425:
1419:
1416:
1379:
1376:
1348:
1326:
1306:
1285:
1255:
1231:. Retrieved
1204:. Retrieved
1199:
1152:. Retrieved
1147:
1090:. Retrieved
1080:
1069:. Retrieved
1059:
1048:. Retrieved
1038:
1027:. Retrieved
1017:
1008:
1007:
991:Labour Party
981:
980:
941:
937:
936:
922:
899:— Preceding
896:
866:
843:
820:
795:
791:
786:
784:
758:
690:
667:— Preceding
662:
658:
656:
627:
623:
615:
590:
550:
485:
445:
380:
340:
291:
251:
195:WikiProjects
153:October 1994
142:
140:
131:
123:
89:
49:
47:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
1067:. Bbc.co.uk
1046:. Bbc.co.uk
765:Mark Arsten
733:Mark Arsten
1793:Categories
1569:(2): 306.
1534:Daily Mail
1483:Report bug
1382:New Labour
1092:2013-03-21
1088:. BBC News
1071:2013-03-21
1050:2013-03-21
1029:2013-03-21
1025:. BBC News
972:John Major
149:Tony Blair
144:New Labour
130:column on
37:under the
27:New Labour
1674:cite book
1666:247671633
1623:cite book
1615:963678831
1582:0261-3794
1466:this tool
1459:this tool
1329:instead.
1164:cite news
968:recession
954:with the
760:A Journey
717:Third Way
566:Socialism
557:socialism
513:Socialism
120:Main Page
1727:MOS:LEAD
1472:Cheers.—
1331:Rothorpe
1327:See also
1313:Rothorpe
1258:reverted
1233:21 March
1206:21 March
1154:21 March
1107:ItsZippy
982:Comments
952:alliance
901:unsigned
808:ItsZippy
750:ItsZippy
687:Comments
669:unsigned
649:ItsZippy
267:Politics
258:politics
214:Politics
185:GA-class
51:reassess
1506:Blair."
1386:my edit
1325:Made a
1292:Equinox
1137:Refdump
593:on the
488:on the
383:on the
294:on the
151:at the
122:in the
74:Process
191:scale.
96:Listed
77:Result
1777:Tbf69
1759:Tbf69
1746:Tbf69
1713:Tbf69
870:BozMo
798:Peter
630:Peter
1767:talk
1763:WJ94
1735:talk
1731:WJ94
1699:talk
1695:WJ94
1684:link
1680:link
1663:OCLC
1654:ISBN
1633:link
1629:link
1612:OCLC
1603:ISBN
1579:ISSN
1521:and
1515:1992
1513:and
1511:1987
1364:talk
1354:and
1335:talk
1317:talk
1296:talk
1271:talk
1235:2013
1208:2013
1177:help
1156:2013
1125:talk
1000:talk
964:1992
960:1987
958:.In
929:talk
909:talk
888:talk
873:talk
854:talk
831:talk
769:talk
737:talk
677:talk
659:what
645:here
643:and
641:here
585:High
375:High
71:Date
1571:doi
1497:Hi
1440:RfC
1410:to
1400:to
1173:|1=
787:the
663:how
480:Mid
286:Mid
1795::
1769:)
1737:)
1723:}}
1717:{{
1701:)
1676:}}
1672:{{
1661:.
1625:}}
1621:{{
1610:.
1577:.
1567:22
1565:.
1561:.
1453:.
1448:}}
1444:{{
1366:)
1358:.
1337:)
1319:)
1298:)
1273:)
1198:.
1168::
1166:}}
1162:{{
1146:.
1127:)
1002:)
931:)
911:)
890:)
868:--
856:)
833:)
771:)
739:)
679:)
114:A
54:it
45:.
1765:(
1733:(
1697:(
1686:)
1668:.
1635:)
1617:.
1584:.
1573::
1485:)
1481:(
1468:.
1461:.
1362:(
1333:(
1315:(
1294:(
1269:(
1237:.
1210:.
1179:)
1175:(
1158:.
1123:(
1095:.
1074:.
1053:.
1032:.
998:(
927:(
907:(
886:(
852:(
829:(
767:(
735:(
708:"
675:(
597:.
492:.
387:.
298:.
197::
136:.
128:"
124:"
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
