485:
468:
427:
401:
377:
341:
324:
311:
510:
363:
261:
196:
42:
550:(about as much as Kinnock) because he was not really part of New Labour, but I have given him more coverage than he previously had - I feel that, in terms of what is relevant to New Labour - there is enough coverage with what I added. I don't know if you think that is enough; I can look for more if you think it needs it.
570:
a socialist, and imply they were two separate things. The two are related (he was a socialist who pursued a revisionist form of socialism), so I don't think a comma would be right, and a hyphen is misleading. Do you think it would be alright to leave that one as it is? With
Giddens, I have noted that
368:
Should John Smith be mentioned at all (beyond one sentence about a commission)? At a couple of points the article mentions policies started by
Kinnock and continued under Blair. It almost reads as if Blair succeeded Kinnock. Was Smith following the same policies or did he try to lead the party in a
549:
Sorry, completely missed 1A! I'll go through those in a moment. I've added something on John Smith in the branding section, as well as into the lead. Kinnock is also mentioned in the electoral support section; I can't find anything in the sources about Smith in that area. There's not loads on him
524:
Hi Road Wizard, thanks for your review. On your first point, I have changed the sentence to "Gordon Brown was not a candidate in the leadership election because of an agreement between the two made in 1994, in which Brown promised not to run for election. The media has since speculated that Blair
565:
On prose, I have dealt with most of those. I am hesitant to call
Crosland a "revisionist-socialist" because the hyphen suggests a widely used term - none of the sources referred to it like that. If I put "revisionist, socialist" - with the comma - it would suggest that Crosland was a revisionist
525:
agreed to stand down and allow Brown the premiership in the future, though Blair's supporters have contended that such a deal never took place." Does that sound ok? I have changed the link as you suggested, and I will now have a look at finding something to write on John Smith.
229:- I am always wary when editors need to use quotations for a specific term. It usually means that there is an extra meaning or context that has not been explained. Should this be fleshed out a little? For example, "Giddens criticised Labour's half completed policies such as..."
534:
That sounds fine to me. I noticed that you referred to the issues under 1B as my first point; there are also issues under 1A that you may have missed. I will check back tomorrow evening to see how you are getting on or if you have any further questions for me.
273:
here as it sounds like we want to make a statement but aren't willing to atribute it to a source. Perhaps change it to "reportedly" or "according to..." with a supporting citation at the end of the sentence?
473:
I am surprised that the New Labour logo can be uploaded with a public domain licence. However I am not an expert on copyright so I will leave it to those wiser than me to challenge the assertion if needed.
515:
This is almost a pass. Once editors have checked through the suggestions above and either accepted them or explained why they aren't suitable, I should be able to push this through to GA status.
219:- is it usually written without punctuation rather than "revisionist-socialist thinker" or "revisionist, socialist thinker"? The sentence seems a little awkward to read without punctuation.
571:
it was
Giddens' own view that the projects were "half-way houses", to be more neutral. The source doesn't go into any extra meaning, just how Giddens referred to the projects.
80:
70:
458:
255:
47:
329:
A mimimum of 1 citation per paragraph is suitable for GA status. You may need to add citations for certain sentences to take this to A or FA status.
583:
Well done, I am happy to promote this article to GA status. Good luck if you choose to take this on to either Peer Review or an A / FA assessment.
406:
There are no obvious signs of bias. The article seems to cover a mixture of successes and failures for the party during the period in question.
178:
A good article that looks well on the way to FA status. There are just a few issues to consider to reach GA then you may want to request a
126:
166:
156:
52:
122:
75:
382:
The article deals succintly with the subject matter without straying too far into a general overview of Labour in government.
335:
107:
99:
462:
276:
235:
450:
214:- missing "a" or perhaps "a speech in July"? I would have changed this myself but am not sure which is better.
454:
297:
281:
421:
588:
540:
150:
584:
536:
442:
305:
270:
243:
179:
146:
432:
No signs of edit warring since the content was spun out from the main Labour Party article.
580:
I am satisfied with the changes you have made and the explanations you have provided here.
170:
115:
17:
391:
239:
572:
551:
526:
491:
479:
251:
247:
227:
Giddens criticised Labour's "half-way houses", including the
National Health Service
92:
224:- perhaps use an alternative second word there "key", "important" or "other"?
280:- is the unit ever likely to get an article? Perhaps direct the link to
592:
575:
554:
544:
529:
160:
494:
to images to make them more useful for people with screen readers.
267:
possibly because of an agreement between the two made in 1994
478:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
346:
Every paragraph is referenced so there are no problems here.
209:- should there be a comma before and after Northern Rock?
207:
that the failing bank
Northern Rock would be nationalised
134:
103:
222:would influence influential political broadcasters
321:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
202:which attempted to provide an synthesis between
8:
30:
217:a leading revisionist socialist thinker
61:
33:
7:
490:Editors may want to consider adding
269:- "possibly" reads a little like a
509:
398:Fair representation without bias:
362:
260:
195:
24:
316:A healthy selection of references
212:In July 2011 speech, Blair stated
204:- is "an" the correct usage here?
182:for the next steps to FA status.
508:
483:
466:
425:
399:
375:
361:
339:
322:
309:
259:
194:
1:
593:18:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
576:22:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
555:22:37, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
545:21:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
530:21:42, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
277:Strategic Communications Unit
161:21:22, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
484:
467:
426:
400:
376:
340:
323:
310:
611:
176:
459:valid fair use rationales
446:to illustrate the topic?
282:Strategic communication
188:reasonably well written
355:broad in its coverage
306:References to sources
284:or a similar article?
369:different direction?
336:No original research
360:A. Major aspects:
293:factually accurate
193:A. Prose quality:
480:suitable captions
461:are provided for
89:
88:
602:
512:
511:
487:
486:
470:
469:
463:non-free content
455:copyright status
429:
428:
403:
402:
379:
378:
365:
364:
343:
342:
326:
325:
313:
312:
263:
262:
198:
197:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
610:
609:
605:
604:
603:
601:
600:
599:
238:compliance for
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
18:Talk:New Labour
12:
11:
5:
608:
606:
598:
597:
596:
595:
581:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
507:Pass or Fail:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
476:
475:
474:
449:A. Images are
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
372:
371:
370:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
332:
331:
330:
319:
318:
317:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
274:
248:words to watch
232:
231:
230:
225:
220:
215:
210:
205:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
607:
594:
590:
586:
582:
579:
578:
577:
574:
569:
564:
563:
556:
553:
548:
547:
546:
542:
538:
533:
532:
531:
528:
523:
522:
514:
513:
506:
505:
503:
500:
493:
489:
488:
481:
477:
472:
471:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
447:
445:
444:
438:
431:
430:
423:
419:
418:
416:
412:
405:
404:
397:
396:
394:
393:
388:
381:
380:
373:
367:
366:
359:
358:
356:
352:
345:
344:
337:
333:
328:
327:
320:
315:
314:
307:
303:
302:
300:
299:
294:
290:
283:
279:
278:
272:
268:
265:
264:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
228:
223:
218:
213:
208:
203:
200:
199:
192:
191:
189:
185:
184:
183:
181:
175:
174:
172:
169:review – see
168:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
567:
501:
440:
414:
390:
374:B. Focused:
354:
296:
292:
275:
266:
226:
221:
216:
211:
206:
201:
187:
177:
173:for criteria
165:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
585:Road Wizard
537:Road Wizard
453:with their
271:weasel term
180:peer review
147:Road Wizard
104:visual edit
298:verifiable
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
422:edit wars
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
573:ItsZippy
552:ItsZippy
527:ItsZippy
492:alt text
441:contain
439:Does it
171:WP:WIAGA
157:contribs
76:Criteria
502:Overall
424:, etc:
392:neutral
252:fiction
127:history
108:history
94:Article
457:, and
451:tagged
443:images
415:stable
413:Is it
389:Is it
353:Is it
291:Is it
254:, and
244:layout
186:Is it
256:lists
136:Watch
16:<
589:talk
541:talk
295:and
240:lead
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
568:and
420:No
334:C.
304:A.
236:MoS
234:B.
591:)
543:)
504::
482::
465::
417:?
395:?
357:?
338::
308::
301:?
258::
250:,
246:,
242:,
190:?
167:GA
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
587:(
539:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.