Knowledge

Talk:Nic Potter

Source 📝

438:, I am bringing the discussion here. The event of contention - the reasons for Potter's departure from the band in 1970, are backed up in Christopholus & Smart p.77, where Potter himself said "I was a bit mixed up about everything. And the other guys were all a bit older than me and perhaps able to cope a bit better at that time with the intensity of the situation and the music". This isn't quite what the Mojo source says, but it's along the right lines. Can we get a consensus one way or the other on whether or not to keep the sourced information? 525:
entirely accurate BUT the Mojo stuff isn't. Nic wasn't worried about VdGG moving in a more experimental direction (whatever that might have been) and, specifically, neither I nor the band were involved in the Occult at the time of Nic's departure. Hope you can all understand that, especially after Nic's death, having this kind of tabloid speculation up there isn't really helpful or respectful to anyone. But I'll now leave it up to the wider community to decide.
225: 204: 146: 84: 53: 22: 170: 70: 94: 524:
HI, Peter Hammill here and it was indeed I who removed the reference. I know that madness lies the way of trawling through Knowledge references and I don't normally do it. In this instance Guy Evans pointed this one out to me, also quite perturbed by it. Simple facts are that Jim and Phil's quote is
607:
It's interesting you describe Mojo as a "tabloid source", as I had always been led to believe that it was a responsible journal with good editorial control (and hence a "high quality source" as described above). This may lead to further potential problems in other articles that cite it - not least
575:
Martin - we can't prove that "The singist" is PH, but since I've directly told Phil Smart (co-author of the book and maintainer of vandergraafgenerator.co.uk) about this article (regarding getting a good free image of Nic), and since this article appears right at the top of a search, I'm quite
390:
Just a heads up, I've asked Paolo Carnelli, who took a really nice photo of Nic c.2006, and can be seen on the main VdGG fan site, if he doesn't mind licensing a lower resolution crop as CC-BY-SA for this article. If I hear anymore, I'll let you know.
636:
Hello again...I didn't mean that Mojo is a tabloid or unreliable (well, any more or less than any other Music Mag), rather that the "Occult" stuff belongs in that sort of sensationalist category. Thanks for the care in trying to get things right.
583:
Peter. I can't speak for everyone, but I think all the regular editors on the Van der Graaf articles were all sorry to hear about Nic's passing at such a young age, and felt his article should be improved to be a complete and
69: 683: 160: 365:
for pages here. I can't see anything contentious in that article. I'd go further and say we should mine that source for any other facts that are not present in the article.
693: 678: 708: 275: 265: 576:
prepared to believe that it is. Removing information that a subject knows to be false but a source reports true is a fairly common action, and a milder version of
703: 561:, and if we can't believe this editor, I'm not sure who we can believe. I'm quite prepared to take advice from someone who ought to know better than most. 241: 698: 112: 688: 673: 232: 209: 116: 120: 653: 541: 423: 111:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 626: 512: 448: 401: 375: 155: 107: 63: 58: 185:
or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the
600:. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources." As well as the book source, a further interview with David Jackson 33: 566: 461: 348: 609: 178: 553:
It is unfortunate that there is no way of editors being able to verify their identitiy, apart from in some
21: 489: 475: 329: 306: 649: 596:
change simply because a subject is deceased, and a key point in this policy is "We must get the article
537: 417: 39: 645: 533: 413: 641: 624: 529: 510: 446: 399: 373: 562: 457: 344: 240:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
485: 471: 325: 302: 237: 99: 617: 503: 439: 431: 392: 366: 340: 321: 224: 203: 616:
ie: one assumed to meet significant editorial standards to be trustworthy and correct.
577: 498:
I have to say my opinion on this depends on the user who removed the information being
182: 667: 589: 558: 499: 145: 613: 484:(Besides, Knowledge is not about what is/was true, it's about what is verifiable.) 435: 427: 362: 358: 601: 554: 83: 52: 169: 89: 298: 324:
Should we mention the disease that plagued the last two years of his life?
604:
confirms the events in the book, so I think we should go with that.
119:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 657: 628: 570: 545: 514: 493: 479: 465: 450: 403: 377: 352: 333: 310: 15: 168: 144: 588:
retrospective of his life. We have a very strict policy on
297:
The article states that in the 1970s Potter played with
361:
does a lot of music articles, and is a frequently used
322:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2013/jan/22/nic-potter
470:
The info is sourced and relevant and needs to stay.
236:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 557:, of course. This does not seem to be a case of 684:Low-importance biography (musicians) articles 8: 320:Is this something we can do something with? 198: 47: 19: 694:Automatically assessed biography articles 679:Stub-Class biography (musicians) articles 709:Low-importance Progressive rock articles 200: 49: 250:Knowledge:WikiProject Progressive Rock 186: 253:Template:WikiProject Progressive Rock 7: 704:Stub-Class Progressive rock articles 230:This article is within the scope of 105:This article is within the scope of 301:. When was that? On what album(s)? 38:It is of interest to the following 409:First departure from Van der Graaf 14: 223: 202: 92: 82: 68: 51: 20: 339:Certainly (to both questions). 270:This article has been rated as 129:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 699:WikiProject Biography articles 132:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 689:Musicians work group articles 674:Stub-Class biography articles 658:10:54, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 629:10:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 612:itself, which is currently a 571:10:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 546:10:16, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 515:10:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 494:09:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 480:09:13, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 466:08:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 451:08:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 244:and see a list of open tasks. 153:This article is supported by 590:biographies of living people 404:19:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 378:19:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 353:19:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 334:18:33, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 311:06:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 233:WikiProject Progressive Rock 117:contribute to the discussion 456:I would certainly keep it. 725: 276:project's importance scale 269: 256:Progressive rock articles 218: 176: 152: 77: 46: 343:is not that well known. 610:Van der Graaf Generator 177:This article has been 173: 149: 28:This article is rated 434:) twice. To avoid an 172: 156:WikiProject Musicians 148: 108:WikiProject Biography 179:automatically rated 430:information (from 174: 150: 135:biography articles 34:content assessment 661: 644:comment added by 549: 532:comment added by 500:who I think he is 290: 289: 286: 285: 282: 281: 197: 196: 193: 192: 716: 660: 638: 622: 548: 526: 508: 444: 428:reliably sourced 397: 371: 316:Guardian article 258: 257: 254: 251: 248: 247:Progressive Rock 238:Progressive rock 227: 220: 219: 214: 210:Progressive Rock 206: 199: 188: 137: 136: 133: 130: 127: 113:join the project 102: 100:Biography portal 97: 96: 95: 86: 79: 78: 73: 72: 71: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 724: 723: 719: 718: 717: 715: 714: 713: 664: 663: 639: 618: 608:the article on 527: 504: 440: 411: 393: 388: 367: 363:reliable source 318: 295: 255: 252: 249: 246: 245: 212: 134: 131: 128: 125: 124: 98: 93: 91: 67: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 722: 720: 712: 711: 706: 701: 696: 691: 686: 681: 676: 666: 665: 634: 633: 632: 631: 605: 581: 563:Martinevans123 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 482: 458:Martinevans123 426:) has removed 410: 407: 387: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 345:Martinevans123 341:Pick's disease 317: 314: 294: 293:With Jeff Beck 291: 288: 287: 284: 283: 280: 279: 272:Low-importance 268: 262: 261: 259: 242:the discussion 228: 216: 215: 213:Low‑importance 207: 195: 194: 191: 190: 175: 165: 164: 161:Low-importance 151: 141: 140: 138: 104: 103: 87: 75: 74: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 721: 710: 707: 705: 702: 700: 697: 695: 692: 690: 687: 685: 682: 680: 677: 675: 672: 671: 669: 662: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 630: 627: 625: 623: 621: 615: 611: 606: 603: 599: 595: 592:, which does 591: 587: 582: 579: 574: 573: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 555:notable cases 552: 551: 550: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 516: 513: 511: 509: 507: 501: 497: 496: 495: 491: 487: 483: 481: 477: 473: 469: 468: 467: 463: 459: 455: 454: 453: 452: 449: 447: 445: 443: 437: 433: 432:Mojo Magazine 429: 425: 422: 419: 415: 408: 406: 405: 402: 400: 398: 396: 385: 379: 376: 374: 372: 370: 364: 360: 356: 355: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 337: 336: 335: 331: 327: 323: 315: 313: 312: 308: 304: 300: 292: 277: 273: 267: 264: 263: 260: 243: 239: 235: 234: 229: 226: 222: 221: 217: 211: 208: 205: 201: 184: 180: 171: 167: 166: 162: 159:(assessed as 158: 157: 147: 143: 142: 139: 122: 121:documentation 118: 114: 110: 109: 101: 90: 88: 85: 81: 80: 76: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 640:— Preceding 635: 619: 614:good article 597: 593: 585: 528:— Preceding 523: 505: 486:Mark in wiki 472:Mark in wiki 441: 420: 412: 394: 389: 368: 359:The Guardian 326:Mark in wiki 319: 303:Mark in wiki 296: 271: 231: 154: 106: 40:WikiProjects 646:The singist 534:The singist 414:the singist 668:Categories 620:Ritchie333 506:Ritchie333 442:Ritchie333 395:Ritchie333 369:Ritchie333 189:parameter. 30:Stub-class 299:Jeff Beck 126:Biography 64:Musicians 59:Biography 654:contribs 642:unsigned 542:contribs 530:unsigned 436:edit war 424:contribs 586:correct 578:WP:DOLT 274:on the 559:WP:COI 187:|auto= 36:scale. 598:right 502:.... 386:Photo 357:Yes, 181:by a 650:talk 602:here 567:talk 538:talk 490:talk 476:talk 462:talk 418:talk 349:talk 330:talk 307:talk 115:and 594:not 266:Low 183:bot 670:: 656:) 652:• 569:) 544:) 540:• 492:) 478:) 464:) 351:) 332:) 309:) 163:). 62:: 648:( 580:. 565:( 536:( 488:( 474:( 460:( 421:· 416:( 347:( 328:( 305:( 278:. 123:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Biography
Musicians
WikiProject icon
Biography portal
WikiProject Biography
join the project
contribute to the discussion
documentation
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Musicians
Low-importance
Note icon
automatically rated
bot
WikiProject icon
Progressive Rock
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Progressive Rock
Progressive rock
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Jeff Beck
Mark in wiki
talk
06:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.