237:
145:
155:
124:
93:
32:
537:
first two, is rather impressive. In 2007, the year it got the award, Weekly Shonen Jump had 2,700,000 readers. Even if you just had a verifiable 10% of those reading you, that'd still make you notable, since it'd be a heck of a lot of people. Verifiable large numbers do read it. That's all that matters.
470:
It was voted by the readers of that magazine to be the most popular feature in it, so yes, most who read the magazine did read it, and loved it. Also, there are references in the article that most of the collected volumes sold over a hundred thousand copies each. It is clearly notable. And the AFD
565:
No, it's not all that matters. Give me a source explicitly stating that 10% of WSJ's readership reads this series. Also, if it really is so popular, there should be coverage of the series, most likely in
Japanese. Either find these sources yourself, or find someone who speaks Japanese and is willing
499:
You are basing your poll argument on several assumptions: that the vast majority of WSJ readers actually voted in the poll (very unlikely) and that a majority of the votes were for this series (also rather unlikely; it's more likely that the votes would have been spread such that this series had the
536:
Common sense. It sold very well, so its notable. Simple as that. I agree we need a lower level for any volume, as well as a total number for all the volumes perhaps. But no matter what level we agree upon, obviously having over a hundred thousand sales for every volume released, other than the
446:
The article was not kept, as per se, the discussion was simply closed as no consensus, which defaults to keep. I would like to point out that this default is recommended by the same guidelines that you so desperately want to ignore. In addition, you still have to answer the open call for reliable
508:
of them - there is a very real difference). In addition, this is simply a publisher-run popularity contest - you have yet to show why it should count towards the series' notability (to do so requires multiple reliable, independent sources focusing on the award). Also, why should the cutoff be at
919:
Not sure where to put this or if it will even be seen, there is a section saying a live action film starring Hugh
Jackman as the title character was announced a few days ago with no references. I am inclined to believe that this is fake, as I have not been able to find any information on the
680:
In 2007, it ranked number one in the Future Gold Cup. That's what Google translate calls the
Gorudofyuchakappu. I Google for "Future Gold Cup" and find nothing. Where on the official site of that magazine would the award be listed at in English? They have an English version of their site.
447:
sources demonstrating the series' sales figures. Circulation numbers for the magazine issues is only applicable to the magazine's article; it's impossible to prove (and ridiculous to assume) that everyone (or even most people) who buys an issue buys it to read this series.
356:
If enough editors are active this time to notice, then consensus will probably be for keep, or at least a no consensus which is the same is keep. With sales figures like that, I don't know how any reasonable person wouldn't see it is clearly notable.
509:
100,000 volumes before sales figures convey notability? Why not lower, or higher? It's a completely arbitrary figure that can be changed at your convenience (reach consensus on the subject, though, and it'll be a completely arbitrary figure
417:
Sales figures ALWAYS matter for common sense reasons. Ignore your suggested guidelines, they not binding in anyway. And the article was kept this time around, enough reasonable people showing up to protest any mindless destruction of it.
920:
announcement of such a film, as well as there are too many name actors for an anime adaptation, and it is claimed that
America Ferrera will be playing Hugh Jackman's character's day form, that of a thirteen year old boy.
62:
52:
589:
You don't need a source unless you have any realistic doubts. And the issue has already been solved. Most people would agree, its clearly notable, and don't need any sources telling them what is obvious.
629:
without sources. Saying that we "don't need a source" goes explicitly against several policies and guidelines. The series' notability has not yet been clearly established (the issue has
753:
Those who don't like it, failed to delete it three times already. It should be safe, for awhile anyway. Never flee from injustice, intolerance, or insanity. Reason must prevail.
335:
So far, the third party coverage is still trivial. Unless substantial coverage, such as a couple of reviews, is presented, then this will be nominated for deletion again. β
72:
977:
215:
205:
982:
972:
513:). As for AFD procedures, they are not even guidelines, but merely "best practices", and you can ignore established policies as well, technically speaking.
181:
168:
129:
927:
471:
I believe is a POLICY, not a GUIDELINE. You can ignore the suggested guidelines, they only suggestions, not laws like the policies are.
738:
three times before. There should be a site that can simply say "if it's a broadcasted anime or published manga, then let's include it."β
735:
274:
644:
577:
524:
458:
261:
953:
408:
346:
104:
180:, and related topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
313:
894:
287:
38:
931:
92:
886:
882:
801:
798:
795:
792:
789:
905:
878:
874:
160:
852:
300:
110:
393:
is concerned. Without substantial coverage by third party sources, all this article will ever be is an
923:
566:
to look for you. This is the only way you are going to settle the notability issue with this series.
31:
863:
248:
949:
404:
342:
901:
394:
236:
890:
831:
828:
825:
819:
754:
682:
636:
591:
569:
538:
516:
472:
450:
419:
358:
810:
957:
935:
909:
867:
816:
813:
807:
776:
747:
743:
720:
716:
704:
651:
613:
584:
560:
531:
494:
465:
441:
412:
380:
350:
859:
17:
966:
944:
399:
337:
390:
730:
There may be interest in moving or copying this article to a more forgiving site (
242:
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
837:
739:
712:
262:"Manga Review: 'Nura: Rise of the Yokai Clan' Volume One by Hiroshi Shiibashi"
154:
150:
144:
123:
41:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
840:
846:
619:
The threshold for inclusion on
Knowledge is verifiability, not truth.
275:"Nura: Rise of the Yokai Clan Vol. #25 Manga Review (Series Finale)"
633:
already been solved), so the notability tag cannot yet be removed.
177:
173:
942:
Section removed for lacking sources to substantiate the claims. β
314:"Anime Review: Nura: Rise of the Yokai Clan - Season 1 Part 1"
231:
86:
26:
731:
172:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
709:
734:), seeing that this article has been already
8:
90:
921:
389:Sales figures doesn't really matter where
118:
260:Aeschliman, Lesley (September 12, 2013).
301:"Nura: Rise of the Yokai Clan, Volume 1"
978:Low-importance anime and manga articles
120:
676:What is the proper name for the award?
625:that the series is notable, it is not
983:All WikiProject Anime and manga pages
190:Knowledge:WikiProject Anime and manga
7:
973:Start-Class anime and manga articles
193:Template:WikiProject Anime and manga
166:This article is within the scope of
299:Brienza, Casey (October 18, 2011).
247:Bertram, Rebecca (March 31, 2013).
109:It is of interest to the following
25:
235:
153:
143:
122:
91:
30:
286:West, David (August 24, 2014).
273:Sylvia, Angela (May 16, 2015).
210:This article has been rated as
37:This article was nominated for
413:01:32, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
381:01:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
351:20:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
288:"Nura: Rise Of The Yokai Clan"
1:
777:21:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
748:20:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
721:20:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
184:and see a list of open tasks.
652:16:13, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
705:15:18, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
614:22:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
585:17:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
561:23:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
532:19:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
495:19:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
466:18:52, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
442:13:14, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
312:Reid, Seb (April 8, 2013).
169:WikiProject Anime and manga
999:
958:22:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
936:16:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
806:ANN summer 2010 previews:
216:project's importance scale
51:, September 29, 2009, see
868:16:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
209:
138:
117:
196:anime and manga articles
71:, January 19, 2009, see
910:21:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
249:"Nura β Herr der Yokai"
18:Talk:Nurarihyon no Mago
832:Right Turn Only vol. 2
829:Right Turn Only vol. 1
395:elaborate plot summary
268:. Critical Lens Media.
161:Anime and manga portal
99:This article is rated
726:Move or copy proposal
61:, March 17 2009, see
788:Mania.com stream:
307:. The Book Repost.
105:content assessment
938:
926:comment added by
851:Sequentila Tart:
826:Shelf Life Ep 1-6
711:Gold Future Cup.β
504:votes, but not a
328:
327:
294:. Uncooked Media.
230:
229:
226:
225:
222:
221:
85:
84:
81:
80:
16:(Redirected from
990:
773:
770:
767:
764:
761:
758:
701:
698:
695:
692:
689:
686:
650:
647:
642:
639:
621:While it may be
610:
607:
604:
601:
598:
595:
583:
580:
575:
572:
557:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
530:
527:
522:
519:
491:
488:
485:
482:
479:
476:
464:
461:
456:
453:
438:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
377:
374:
371:
368:
365:
362:
321:
318:UK Anime Network
308:
295:
282:
269:
256:
239:
232:
198:
197:
194:
191:
188:
163:
158:
157:
147:
140:
139:
134:
126:
119:
102:
96:
95:
87:
43:
42:
34:
27:
21:
998:
997:
993:
992:
991:
989:
988:
987:
963:
962:
917:
895:Blu-Ray - Set 1
785:
771:
768:
765:
762:
759:
756:
728:
699:
696:
693:
690:
687:
684:
678:
645:
640:
637:
634:
608:
605:
602:
599:
596:
593:
578:
573:
570:
567:
555:
552:
549:
546:
543:
540:
525:
520:
517:
514:
489:
486:
483:
480:
477:
474:
459:
454:
451:
448:
436:
433:
430:
427:
424:
421:
375:
372:
369:
366:
363:
360:
333:
311:
298:
285:
272:
259:
246:
195:
192:
189:
187:Anime and manga
186:
185:
159:
152:
132:
130:Anime and manga
103:on Knowledge's
100:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
996:
994:
986:
985:
980:
975:
965:
964:
961:
960:
928:71.226.117.153
916:
913:
898:
897:
856:
855:
849:
843:
834:
822:
804:
784:
781:
780:
779:
727:
724:
677:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
511:with consensus
384:
383:
332:
329:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
309:
296:
283:
270:
257:
243:
240:
228:
227:
224:
223:
220:
219:
212:Low-importance
208:
202:
201:
199:
182:the discussion
165:
164:
148:
136:
135:
133:Lowβimportance
127:
115:
114:
108:
97:
83:
82:
79:
78:
77:
76:
66:
56:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
995:
984:
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
970:
968:
959:
955:
951:
947:
946:
941:
940:
939:
937:
933:
929:
925:
914:
912:
911:
907:
903:
896:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
872:
871:
870:
869:
865:
861:
854:
850:
848:
844:
842:
839:
835:
833:
830:
827:
823:
821:
818:
815:
812:
809:
805:
803:
800:
797:
794:
791:
787:
786:
782:
778:
775:
774:
752:
751:
750:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
725:
723:
722:
718:
714:
710:
707:
706:
703:
702:
675:
653:
648:
643:
632:
628:
624:
620:
617:
616:
615:
612:
611:
588:
587:
586:
581:
576:
564:
563:
562:
559:
558:
535:
534:
533:
528:
523:
512:
507:
503:
498:
497:
496:
493:
492:
469:
468:
467:
462:
457:
445:
444:
443:
440:
439:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
401:
396:
392:
388:
387:
386:
385:
382:
379:
378:
355:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:
330:
319:
315:
310:
306:
302:
297:
293:
289:
284:
280:
276:
271:
267:
263:
258:
254:
250:
245:
244:
241:
238:
234:
233:
217:
213:
207:
204:
203:
200:
183:
179:
175:
171:
170:
162:
156:
151:
149:
146:
142:
141:
137:
131:
128:
125:
121:
116:
112:
106:
98:
94:
89:
88:
74:
70:
67:
64:
60:
57:
54:
50:
47:
46:
45:
44:
40:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
943:
922:βΒ Preceding
918:
902:Gabriel Yuji
899:
857:
755:
729:
708:
683:
679:
630:
626:
622:
618:
592:
539:
510:
505:
501:
473:
420:
398:
359:
336:
334:
317:
304:
291:
278:
265:
255:(in German).
252:
211:
167:
111:WikiProjects
69:No consensus
68:
58:
49:No consensus
48:
279:Fandom Post
266:Blogcritics
253:AnimePro.de
101:Start-class
967:Categories
627:verifiable
391:notability
331:Notability
73:discussion
63:discussion
53:discussion
860:KrebMarkt
783:Review(s)
736:nominated
305:Teenreads
924:unsigned
506:majority
39:deletion
732:example
214:on the
853:vol. 2
845:AICN:
841:vol. 2
838:vol. 1
107:scale.
59:Delete
945:Farix
915:Film?
873:ANN:
836:CBB:
824:ANN:
802:Ep 11
799:Ep 04
796:Ep 03
793:Ep 02
790:Ep 01
772:Focus
740:Tokek
713:Tokek
700:Focus
609:Focus
556:Focus
490:Focus
437:Focus
400:Farix
376:Focus
338:Farix
178:manga
174:anime
932:talk
906:talk
875:GN 3
864:talk
744:talk
717:talk
623:true
502:most
646:εοΌοΌ
638:γγ€γ
631:not
579:εοΌοΌ
571:γγ€γ
526:εοΌοΌ
518:γγ€γ
460:εοΌοΌ
452:γγ€γ
397:. β
292:Neo
206:Low
969::
956:)
952:|
934:)
908:)
900:--
893:;
891:13
889:,
887:12
885:,
883:10
881:,
877:,
866:)
858:--
847:#1
746:)
719:)
641:γ¬γ€
574:γ¬γ€
521:γ¬γ€
455:γ¬γ€
411:)
407:|
349:)
345:|
316:.
303:.
290:.
277:.
264:.
251:.
176:,
954:c
950:t
948:(
930:(
904:(
879:6
862:(
820:5
817:4
814:3
811:2
808:1
769:m
766:a
763:e
760:r
757:D
742:(
715:(
697:m
694:a
691:e
688:r
685:D
649:γ
635:γ
606:m
603:a
600:e
597:r
594:D
582:γ
568:γ
553:m
550:a
547:e
544:r
541:D
529:γ
515:γ
487:m
484:a
481:e
478:r
475:D
463:γ
449:γ
434:m
431:a
428:e
425:r
422:D
409:c
405:t
403:(
373:m
370:a
367:e
364:r
361:D
347:c
343:t
341:(
320:.
281:.
218:.
113::
75:.
65:.
55:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
