Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Nurarihyon no Mago - Knowledge

Source 📝

590:. The manga is really popular in Shonen Jump. It often gets a spot in the top 10 there. The first volume of the manga was 9th in best sales the month it was released in japan. It is also listed in many english websites like mangaupdates.com or mangahelpers which are some of the most popular one out of the many website related to Nurarihyon No mago. On mangaupdate it is listed as #97 out of (roughly) 38 000 mangas in popularity. In mangahelpers the manga has topics with more than 20 000 views. I believe given it's popularity in the english comunity this manga is more than qualified to remain on wikipedia. 496:. However, the amount of notice this series gets, in multiple wikipedias and a wide variety of sources, some marginally reliable and a lot non-reliable, convinces me that the series is notable, even if I cannot demonstrate it. So while I can't convince myself to say "keep", I cannot say any form of delete, and there is no possible merge target that I can see. Therefore I recuse myself (at length). — 608:
Please provide actual sources for your claims of being the best seller in its first month of release. Also, we do not look at scanslation sites, period. They are illegal and are not reliable sources. A title appearing there and its so-called popularity is completely irrelevant. --
420:
Its carried in a very notable and highly influential magazine for this genre, and has an ample number of readers. And when I Google, I get 210,000 hits for "Nurarihyon no Mago". Unless that translates to a common expression, I'll assume everyone is talking about that series.
355:
JA wiki articel is much more extensive and has five sources. I didn't check the Chinese wiki article, the spanish wiki article, or the Russian wiki article, but the fact that articles exist in FIVE different languages would seem to imply there's some potential notability.
712:
As Doceirias said, it is not a one shot (anymore). It first came out as a one shot, and ended up popular enough to be serialized weekly in Shonen Jump as a full legit manga. There are now 3 volumes out in the market, and 43 chapters released in Shonen
637:. My feelings are much like Quasirandom's; this one is really borderline. It was probably created prematurely, but there are indications the book is on track to being notable in the near future. I'm inclined to 303:
Not really sure when all manga in Jump started getting articles, but this does appear to be the one series in the lot that is stable and successful. The others are all canceled or going to be canceled soon.
439:
Obviously you should not that Google Hits are NOT an indication of notability at all. Nor is its appearance in a manga anthology, which the large bulk of all manga do, any indication of notability. --
773:
I disagree. When the article is ALL unuseful fancruft, its usually better to delete and try again when and if sources are available. No amount of cleanup will make a topic notable. --
171: 166: 269: 175: 374:
How many wiki's also have articles is irrelevant. As for the sources on the Japanese Wiki, did you even check them? They are from the manga itself. Hardly independent sources. --
158: 118: 401:, this one seems to have some legs. There's even some merchandising out there for it. I'm not up for more extensive Japanese searches, but I'm very leery of saying delete. — 323: 492:. I'm not finding anything by way of reliable coverage in English aside from the basic publication facts, so by objective measures this seems to fail 672:; is a one-shot manga by an unnotable author. Page consists of fancruft list and would provide no useful information to an average reader. -- 85: 80: 129:. Google search under the Kanji title is not turning up any reliable sources. Author also appears to be non-notable. Prod contested using an 89: 698:
Not a one-shot manga. Has three volumes out already, and is ongoing; badly written the page may be, but that is not a reason for deletion.
357: 72: 622: 553: 452: 290: 231: 17: 162: 787: 741: 686: 215: 154: 812: 36: 792: 768: 746: 722: 707: 691: 650: 626: 599: 580: 557: 527: 505: 481: 456: 430: 410: 385: 365: 343: 313: 294: 255: 235: 144: 54: 811:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
214:. Unnotable manga series with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Article is pure plot. Also delete 616: 547: 518:
back into the main article, and cleaned up by templating and adding volume publication information et cet. —
446: 361: 281: 225: 76: 764: 523: 501: 426: 406: 727:
I'm sorry, I misread the article. Despite that, being serialized doesn't make the subject notable. --
610: 541: 440: 328: 275: 219: 756: 703: 646: 309: 783: 737: 682: 537: 381: 339: 251: 140: 68: 60: 635: 632: 514:
I should clarify: that's a no vote on the main article. For the list of chapters, it should be
576: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
760: 718: 595: 519: 497: 422: 402: 699: 642: 305: 775: 729: 674: 376: 334: 246: 135: 130: 49: 669: 572: 493: 475: 207: 192: 106: 714: 665: 591: 211: 126: 397:. Unlike most of Jump's recent titles (deservedly being sent to AfD), but like 536:
Chapter list merge done...who keeps doing these bad splits *head shaking*. If
218:
with it, which appears to have been an unnecessary split with no sources. --
468:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
398: 755:
In addition to not being a one-shot but a series, consisting of
805:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
634:. The second volume failed to place, but the third was 5th: 188: 184: 180: 113: 102: 98: 94: 270:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
244:
I missed that, including in with this discussion. --
473:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 133:rational relating to Star Trek and Buffy episodes. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 815:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 759:cruft is a reason to clean up, not delete. — 540:is deleted, redirect should also go. -- 268:: This debate has been included in the 641:and delete later if things fall apart. 631:It was 9th place the week of release: 322:I think it started from all of these 7: 216:List of Nurarihyon No Mago chapters 155:List of Nurarihyon No Mago chapters 24: 326:listing every series that ran in 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 793:05:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 769:03:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 747:05:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 723:02:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 708:22:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 692:21:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 651:18:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 627:16:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 600:10:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 581:07:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 558:20:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 528:20:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 506:20:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 482:07:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 457:00:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 431:00:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 411:14:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 386:14:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 366:14:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 344:14:19, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 314:05:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 295:05:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 256:05:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 236:05:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 145:04:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 55:16:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 832: 808:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 46:no consensus to delete 538:Nurarihyon no Mago 329:Weekly Shōnen Jump 69:Nurarihyon no Mago 61:Nurarihyon no Mago 44:The result was 484: 273: 823: 810: 778: 732: 677: 613: 544: 478: 472: 470: 443: 278: 264: 222: 196: 178: 125:No assertion of 116: 110: 92: 52: 34: 831: 830: 826: 825: 824: 822: 821: 820: 819: 813:deletion review 806: 776: 730: 675: 664:- Doesn't meet 611: 571:. Give it time. 542: 476: 466: 441: 276: 220: 169: 153: 150:Also included: 112: 83: 67: 64: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 829: 827: 818: 817: 800: 798: 797: 796: 795: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 695: 694: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 603: 602: 584: 583: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 531: 530: 509: 508: 486: 485: 471: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 434: 433: 414: 413: 391: 390: 389: 388: 369: 368: 349: 348: 347: 346: 317: 316: 288: 287: 261: 260: 259: 258: 239: 238: 200: 199: 198: 197: 123: 122: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 828: 816: 814: 809: 803: 802: 801: 794: 791: 789: 785: 780: 779: 772: 771: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 748: 745: 743: 739: 734: 733: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 697: 696: 693: 690: 688: 684: 679: 678: 671: 667: 663: 660: 659: 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 633: 630: 629: 628: 624: 621: 618: 614: 607: 606: 605: 604: 601: 597: 593: 589: 586: 585: 582: 578: 574: 570: 567: 566: 559: 555: 552: 549: 545: 539: 535: 534: 533: 532: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 512: 511: 510: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 488: 487: 483: 480: 479: 469: 465: 464: 458: 454: 451: 448: 444: 438: 437: 436: 435: 432: 428: 424: 419: 416: 415: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 393: 392: 387: 383: 379: 378: 373: 372: 371: 370: 367: 363: 359: 358:76.116.247.15 354: 351: 350: 345: 341: 337: 336: 331: 330: 325: 324:nav templates 321: 320: 319: 318: 315: 311: 307: 302: 299: 298: 297: 296: 292: 286: 283: 279: 271: 267: 263: 262: 257: 253: 249: 248: 243: 242: 241: 240: 237: 233: 230: 227: 223: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 201: 194: 190: 186: 182: 177: 173: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 151: 149: 148: 147: 146: 142: 138: 137: 132: 128: 120: 115: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 807: 804: 799: 781: 774: 735: 728: 680: 673: 661: 638: 619: 612:Collectonian 587: 568: 550: 543:Collectonian 515: 489: 474: 467: 449: 442:Collectonian 417: 394: 375: 352: 333: 327: 300: 289: 284: 277:Collectonian 265: 245: 228: 221:Collectonian 203: 134: 124: 45: 43: 31: 28: 761:Quasirandom 592:User:Skeith 520:Quasirandom 498:Quasirandom 423:Dream Focus 403:Quasirandom 127:notability 700:Doceirias 643:Doceirias 306:Doceirias 777:Kraftlos 757:unuseful 731:Kraftlos 676:Kraftlos 623:contribs 554:contribs 453:contribs 291:contribs 232:contribs 206:, fails 119:View log 788:Contrib 742:Contrib 687:Contrib 573:andycjp 490:No vote 477:MBisanz 395:Comment 353:Comment 301:Comment 172:protect 167:history 86:protect 81:history 715:Skeith 662:Delete 516:merged 399:Toriko 204:Delete 176:delete 131:WP:OSE 114:delete 90:delete 713:jump. 670:WP:BK 494:WP:BK 377:Farix 335:Farix 247:Farix 208:WP:BK 193:views 185:watch 181:links 136:Farix 117:) – ( 107:views 99:watch 95:links 48:. ··· 16:< 784:Talk 765:talk 738:Talk 719:talk 704:talk 683:Talk 666:WP:N 647:talk 639:Keep 617:talk 596:talk 588:Keep 577:talk 569:Keep 548:talk 524:talk 502:talk 447:talk 427:talk 418:Keep 407:talk 382:Talk 362:talk 340:Talk 332:. -- 310:talk 282:talk 266:Note 252:Talk 226:talk 212:WP:N 210:and 189:logs 163:talk 159:edit 141:Talk 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 668:or 274:-- 272:. 51:日本穣 786:| 767:) 740:| 721:) 706:) 685:| 649:) 625:) 598:) 579:) 556:) 526:) 504:) 455:) 429:) 409:) 384:) 364:) 342:) 312:) 293:) 254:) 234:) 191:| 187:| 183:| 179:| 174:| 170:| 165:| 161:| 143:) 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 790:) 782:( 763:( 744:) 736:( 717:( 702:( 689:) 681:( 645:( 620:· 615:( 594:( 575:( 551:· 546:( 522:( 500:( 450:· 445:( 425:( 405:( 380:( 360:( 338:( 308:( 285:· 280:( 250:( 229:· 224:( 195:) 157:( 139:( 121:) 111:( 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
日本穣
16:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Nurarihyon no Mago
Nurarihyon no Mago
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
notability
WP:OSE
Farix
Talk
04:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
List of Nurarihyon No Mago chapters
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.