673:
648:
615:
563:
540:
519:
498:
466:
422:
401:
343:
208:
451:
328:
295:
254:
237:
42:
758:
extremely unlikely for the ship to have been hit, the
British battlecruisers had the worst accuracy of any unit in the engagement, somewhere in the 2% range, and most of those came at much closer range than this, later in the battle. Heck,
290:
section. I understand that these numbers are not supposed to match ideally, but the deviation is pretty high. Probably the reasons should be explained or the number (in the last paragraph) should be omitted.
308:
section has these sentences: "The
British destroyers launched a torpedo attack, which forced the three cruisers to turn to starboard to avoid them. This pointed them directly at the German line.
442:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
783:
my knowledge of the battle is by far less deep then your's, I also came to conclusion that the damage in that situation was unlikely. The process of review is now complete. Good work! —
439:
722:
I don't understand your third point in the first box - "though" is a neutral word (unlike "luckily/unfortunately" or something like those). It's a simple statement of fact.
217:
368:
80:
70:
286:
s crew. Her commander and a small group of officers and men remained on board." of the last paragraph raises the questions about the crew number in
Infobox and
632:
372:
364:
47:
356:
827:
Re: crew size - ships typically had a larger wartime crew, which is what this discrepancy represents. I clarified that in the design section.
661:
766:, the worst-shooting ship of the battle, scored a whopping 2 or 3 hits out of over 400 large-caliber rounds fired, less than 1% accuracy.
126:
360:
550:
75:
754:
That's not how I read it - as far as I'm aware, "though" is similar "but", and has no connotation like you suggested. That said, it
475:
52:
122:
624:
156:
107:
233:
British destroyers were spotted to the south and the order to scuttle the ship was given." (italics added) should be fixed.
636:
431:
246:
The last two sentences should be separated from the (currently) last paragraph, as they give a false impression that SMS
435:
352:
99:
628:
528:
386:
576:
507:
271:
was briefly engaged by the battlecruisers at very long range, though she was not hit." (second paragraph of the
760:
835:
771:
727:
712:
601:
597:
817:
788:
745:
657:
150:
605:
409:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
740:
implies unlikeliness, which seems to contradict the situation. This issue is pretty minor. —
410:
185:
225:
The phrase "They rigged an improvised sail in an attempt to bring the ship closer to shore,
115:
17:
554:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
324:
seems clear from the next sentence, the ease of reading will benefit from clarification.
831:
767:
723:
708:
813:
784:
741:
146:
320:..." The sentence in the middle probably should be clarified. Though the meaning of
447:
Displacement by design isn't referenced in
Infobox and isn't mentioned in article.
92:
527:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
250:
engaged in battle with Dutch trawler. If she did, it should be clarified.
575:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
839:
821:
792:
775:
749:
731:
716:
707:
All three items should be addressed. Thanks for reviewing the article.
160:
275:
section should probably be replaced with some logically neutral word.
134:
103:
812:
are recommendations. I won't fail GA on this basis. —
282:
came alongside and took off 477 officers and men of
218:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
8:
278:The sentences "At 02:00, the torpedo boat
30:
178:
61:
33:
171:This section is supposed to be edited
7:
699:Please reply to the comments in the
220:; spelling and grammar are correct.
216:. the prose is clear, concise, and
24:
671:
646:
613:
561:
538:
517:
496:
464:
449:
420:
399:
341:
326:
293:
252:
235:
206:
440:could reasonably be challenged
1:
633:valid non-free use rationales
840:00:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
822:00:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
793:00:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
776:00:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
750:00:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
732:23:53, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
717:23:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
672:
647:
614:
562:
539:
518:
497:
465:
421:
400:
342:
207:
161:23:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
312:attempted to steam between
856:
584:
483:
411:the layout style guideline
380:
193:
180:
585:
484:
381:
194:
184:
181:
660:to the topic, and have
351:. it complies with the
304:The forth paragraph of
489:Broad in its coverage
579:or content dispute.
476:no original research
392:no original research
830:Fixed the "them"s.
814:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
785:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
742:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
736:I was meaning that
506:. it addresses the
438:. All content that
683:Overall assessment
629:copyright statuses
592:, if possible, by
373:list incorporation
691:
690:
662:suitable captions
635:are provided for
306:Battle of Jutland
273:Battle of Jutland
229:at around 03:00,
89:
88:
847:
804:BTW, the issues
675:
674:
650:
649:
637:non-free content
617:
616:
565:
564:
542:
541:
521:
520:
500:
499:
468:
467:
457:
453:
452:
432:reliable sources
424:
423:
403:
402:
345:
344:
334:
330:
329:
301:
297:
296:
260:
256:
255:
243:
239:
238:
210:
209:
179:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
855:
854:
850:
849:
848:
846:
845:
844:
696:
450:
448:
355:guidelines for
353:Manual of Style
327:
325:
294:
292:
253:
251:
236:
234:
190:Review Comment
175:by reviewer(s).
168:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
18:Talk:SMS Elbing
12:
11:
5:
853:
851:
843:
842:
828:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
695:
692:
689:
688:
686:
676:
668:
667:
665:
651:
643:
642:
640:
618:
610:
609:
583:
582:
580:
566:
558:
557:
555:
543:
535:
534:
532:
522:
514:
513:
511:
510:of the topic.
501:
493:
492:
482:
481:
479:
474:. it contains
469:
461:
460:
459:
458:
443:
425:
417:
416:
414:
404:
396:
395:
379:
378:
376:
365:words to watch
346:
338:
337:
336:
335:
302:
276:
261:
244:
221:
211:
203:
202:
192:
191:
188:
183:
167:
164:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
852:
841:
837:
833:
829:
826:
825:
824:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
794:
790:
786:
782:
779:
778:
777:
773:
769:
765:
764:
757:
753:
752:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
734:
733:
729:
725:
721:
720:
719:
718:
714:
710:
705:
704:
703:section here.
702:
693:
687:
684:
680:
677:
670:
669:
666:
663:
659:
655:
652:
645:
644:
641:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
619:
612:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
588:
581:
578:
574:
570:
567:
560:
559:
556:
553:
552:
547:
544:
537:
536:
533:
530:
529:summary style
526:
523:
516:
515:
512:
509:
505:
502:
495:
494:
490:
487:
480:
477:
473:
470:
463:
462:
456:
446:
445:
444:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
419:
418:
415:
412:
408:
405:
398:
397:
393:
389:
388:
384:
377:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:lead sections
354:
350:
347:
340:
339:
333:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
300:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
259:
249:
245:
242:
232:
228:
224:
223:
222:
219:
215:
212:
205:
204:
200:
197:
189:
187:
177:
176:
174:
165:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
809:
805:
803:
780:
762:
755:
737:
706:
700:
698:
697:
682:
678:
656:. media are
653:
623:. media are
620:
593:
589:
586:
572:
568:
549:
545:
524:
508:main aspects
503:
488:
485:
471:
454:
436:cited inline
427:
406:
391:
385:
382:
348:
331:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
298:
287:
283:
279:
272:
268:
264:
257:
247:
240:
230:
226:
213:
199:Well-written
198:
195:
172:
170:
169:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
763:New Zealand
627:with their
590:Illustrated
104:visual edit
694:Discussion
387:Verifiable
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
832:Parsecboy
768:Parsecboy
724:Parsecboy
709:Parsecboy
263:The word
186:Attribute
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
658:relevant
596:such as
577:edit war
157:contribs
147:Czarkoff
76:Criteria
551:Neutral
369:fiction
284:Elbing'
127:history
108:history
94:Article
781:Though
738:though
701:Status
631:, and
625:tagged
598:images
573:Stable
371:, and
361:layout
314:Nassau
310:Elbing
288:Design
269:Elbing
265:though
248:Elbing
166:Status
606:audio
604:, or
602:video
594:media
390:with
318:Posen
182:Rate
136:Watch
16:<
836:talk
818:talk
789:talk
772:talk
761:HMS
746:talk
728:talk
713:talk
455:Done
434:are
332:Done
322:them
316:and
299:Done
258:Done
241:Done
173:only
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
810:1a5
806:1a3
756:was
531:).
280:S53
231:but
227:but
838:)
820:)
808:–
791:)
774:)
748:)
730:)
715:)
685:.
681:.
664:.
654:6b
639:.
621:6a
608::
600:,
587:6.
571:.
548:.
525:3b
504:3a
491::
486:3.
478:.
472:2c
430:.
428:2b
413:.
407:2a
394::
383:2.
375:.
367:,
363:,
359:,
349:1b
214:1a
201::
196:1.
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
834:(
816:(
787:(
770:(
744:(
726:(
711:(
679:7
569:5
546:4
267:"
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.