609:
That should be clarified. (2) what does it mean that it "looks like a regular dodecahedron on the surface"? If its surface is (looks?) identical, what is the point of making a distinction? If the regular dodecahedron figure, present now, is correct, I argue the TSSD should be removed from the article. If the regular dodecahedron figure is incorrect, the picture should be corrected. In an intermediate case that e.g. the difference between the regular dodec and the TSSD is that the TSSD has additional faces that do not change the solid object, I argue that the TSSD should be removed.
868:
series – the names "quasirhombicosidodecahedron" and "quasitruncated dodecadodecahedron" surely make it clear that this is not just OR). As a first step I would note that the original pentagram faces get quasitruncated exactly as they would in isolation (I think you have a gallery of those polygram morphs), while the faces of the dual expand to connect them, but visualising that is much easier said than done. (It goes without saying that this applies just as well to the nonconvex uniform polyhedra arising from the cube.)
84:
74:
53:
655:
more questions than it would answer. Anyway, t{5/2, 5} looks exactly like a dodecahedron, but has two faces for every one of the dodecahedron; one pentagon {5} (from the vertices of {5/2, 5}) and one decagon {10/2} (from the faces of {5/2, 5}). Since the latter looks exactly like two coinciding pentagons the resulting solid looks like 3 coinciding dodecahedra, but the way the faces connect to each other is of course quite different. (About the same thing happens for t{5/2, 3}).
487:
22:
387:
311:
235:
769:
that difficult to think about this degeneracy once you realise that the truncation literally cuts off the spikes and leaves you with what looks like the original dodecahedral core, but intermediate steps would certainly help. There is, I think, more challenge in illustrating where t{5/3, 5} comes into this; do you have an idea on how to do that?
737:
721:
930:
will do as an example) this way, as then the stellation diagram is not just a straight line. I'd prefer "first" to make it clear that it's the first in the very same sense as that of polygons; it's what you get when you extend the edges of the dodecahedron until they meet again, just like how you construct a pentagram.
867:
Okay, I've added Tom's gifs to all the relevant polyhedra in the truncation sequences. Now the more vexing question is how to illustrate where the quasitruncations t{5/3, 5} and t{5/3, 3} come into this (not to mention the appearance of the quasicantellates and the quasicantitruncates further in this
654:
I think it would be a serious mistake to remove t{5/2, 5} just because it is degenerate as a uniform polyhedron. Granted, one can make an overlapping-face version of any polyhedron, but this one turns up naturally in the truncation sequence of a regular polyhedron, and not including it frankly raises
839:
A loop would be welcome, but I think it's not necessary if it's difficult to generate. I would nevertheless prefer it if the gif went more slowly; around the endpoints it is okay, but around the rectification in the centre it really moves too fast for the eye to follow, even if you already know what
929:
It honestly seems more natural to me to say that the dodecahedron is the zeroth stellation of itself. Then {5/2, 5} is the first, {5, 5/2} is the second, and {5/2, 3} is the third. However, it's not terribly obvious how to number the stellations of a more general polyhedron (the regular icosahedron
608:
Yes, thanks! The additional information is appreciated ... there are still things I'm confused about though, which I think any non-geometer would be confused about: (1) it looks like the previous paragraph, "This polyhedron is the truncation of the great dodecahedron:" applies to the TSSD; does it?
768:
My copy of Stella died with my last computer and I'm not sure how to generate all those extra truncations with it anyway, but certainly the truncation series from {5/2, 5} down to t{5/2, 5} is doable with its dual-morph feature. I could upload GrĂĽnbaum's illustration for that, too. I find it's not
696:
may seem too esoteric given I overlooked them for 15 years, not understanding what they were, since overlapping geometry is hard to understand, while its the underlying topology that is what defines them rather than appearance. DS, I'm open for more images of varied truncations if someone wants to
669:
BTW, since quite a few people seem to stumble over this (so did I at first, though that was back in 2009), it occurs to me that we should show a complete series through the hyper-, quasi-, and antitruncations for {5/2, 5} just as we do for {4, 3} (the cube) at
638:
Yes, much improved! But agreed, a non-degenerate figure would be great -- necessary, I'd argue; a solid with exactly the same dimensions as a dodecahedron seems too esoteric to be included. One can always complicate a given solid by adding overlapping faces.
573:
GrĂĽnbaum has a nice picture of the truncation procedure applied to {5/2, 5} in his famous paper; I think we can use it as an illustration. For this reasons the small stellated truncated dodecahedron is sometimes called the
413:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
337:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
261:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
458:
Discussion of the "truncated small stellated dodecahedron" is confusing ... The picture is of a normal dodecahedron, and neither the text nor the picture seem to apply to the polyhedron at
140:
555:. The second looks like a regular dodecahedron, except the pentagon faces are doubly-wrapped pentagons, {10/2}. To see this you'd have to show progressively larger truncations of a
194:
How can this be a spherical tiling? The sphere has Euler characteristic 2 while the small stellated dodecahedron has Euler characteristic -6, so how can it be a spherical tiling?
578:
small stellated dodecahedron, as it is t{5/3, 5} (the cutting planes have passed right through the centre and are now overlapping each other coming back out the other way).
804:
Yes, that's excellent! Would you mind also doing it for the great stellated dodecahedron, which passes through a similar degenerate figure along the way as well?
959:
130:
317:
954:
393:
241:
675:
496:
106:
883:
I think I'm done for now, a good addition. I'm sure I could do more with some extended truncations as calculated forms, but nothing quick.
906:
97:
58:
541:
531:
513:
503:
440:
364:
288:
551:
536:
523:
508:
624:
Thanks Rob. I think its good now. Can you make a nonuniform truncation image that shows the geometry when its not degenerate?
546:
518:
741:
725:
648:
618:
476:
33:
436:
360:
284:
818:
Added. This is what Stella generates. I suppose it would be better as a loop, or at least a pause at start and end.
736:
720:
209:
21:
935:
873:
845:
809:
774:
683:
660:
583:
199:
599:
459:
39:
83:
594:
I edited the description a bit, although it's a bit wordy now. See if you think it helps to clarify.
464:
169:
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
729:
640:
610:
468:
89:
486:
165:
73:
52:
931:
919:
888:
869:
841:
823:
805:
788:
770:
745:
702:
679:
656:
629:
579:
564:
397:
321:
245:
216:
195:
184:
644:
614:
595:
472:
939:
923:
892:
877:
849:
827:
813:
792:
778:
706:
687:
671:
664:
633:
603:
587:
575:
568:
480:
444:
368:
292:
220:
203:
188:
173:
693:
418:
342:
266:
948:
425:
349:
273:
674:, and that {5/2, 3} should get the same treatment. All this seems to be because the
915:
884:
834:
819:
799:
784:
763:
698:
625:
560:
212:
180:
904:
102:
386:
310:
234:
79:
421:
then you may need to upload it to
Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
345:
then you may need to upload it to
Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
269:
then you may need to upload it to
Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
556:
527:
is different than a "truncated small stellated dodecahedron", t{5/2,5},
715:
485:
302:
File:Second stellation of dodecahedron.png
Nominated for Deletion
378:
File:Third stellation of dodecahedron.png
Nominated for Deletion
226:
File:First stellation of dodecahedron.png
Nominated for Deletion
179:
It's given in the table: Faces = 12, edges = 30, vertices = 12.
461:. Seems to require revision, if a proper figure can be made.
15:
914:
Funny, the linked table says it's the first of three. —
490:
A truncated pentagram with 10 equally spaced vertices.
454:
Confusion about truncated small stellated dodecahedron
210:
Kepler-Poinsot_polyhedra#Euler_characteristic_.CF.87
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
424:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
348:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
272:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
162:
How many Points (and faces) are in this polyhedron?
907:second of four stellations of the dodecahedron
8:
559:until pairs of vertices and edges converge.
19:
783:I never used the truncation morph before.
462:
318:File:Second stellation of dodecahedron.png
47:
394:File:Third stellation of dodecahedron.png
242:File:First stellation of dodecahedron.png
678:t{5/3, 5} is just rather poorly named.
49:
676:small stellated truncated dodecahedron
497:small stellated truncated dodecahedron
433:This notification is provided by a Bot
357:This notification is provided by a Bot
281:This notification is provided by a Bot
396:, has been nominated for deletion at
320:, has been nominated for deletion at
244:, has been nominated for deletion at
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
428:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
352:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
276:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
960:Low-priority mathematics articles
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
955:Start-Class mathematics articles
735:
719:
549:
544:
539:
534:
529:
521:
516:
511:
506:
501:
402:Deletion requests September 2011
385:
326:Deletion requests September 2011
309:
250:Deletion requests September 2011
233:
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
392:An image used in this article,
316:An image used in this article,
240:An image used in this article,
135:This article has been rated as
1:
445:10:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
369:10:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
293:10:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
109:and see a list of open tasks.
940:16:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
924:03:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
893:05:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
878:05:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
850:04:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
828:04:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
814:04:10, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
793:03:08, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
779:02:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
742:Great stellated dodecahedron
726:Small stellated dodecahedron
707:00:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
688:23:52, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
665:23:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
634:18:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
604:01:55, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
588:00:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
569:20:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
481:19:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
189:03:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
174:04:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
400:in the following category:
324:in the following category:
248:in the following category:
221:07:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
204:06:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
976:
134:
67:
46:
141:project's priority scale
98:WikiProject Mathematics
491:
437:CommonsNotificationBot
361:CommonsNotificationBot
285:CommonsNotificationBot
28:This article is rated
489:
899:zero-based indexing?
840:you're looking for.
748:truncation sequence
732:truncation sequence
121:mathematics articles
495:It is confusing. A
730:great dodecahedron
692:Really all of the
492:
426:fair use rationale
350:fair use rationale
274:fair use rationale
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
752:
751:
746:great icosahedron
483:
467:comment added by
451:
450:
406:What should I do?
398:Wikimedia Commons
375:
374:
330:What should I do?
322:Wikimedia Commons
299:
298:
254:What should I do?
246:Wikimedia Commons
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
967:
910:
838:
803:
767:
739:
723:
716:
554:
553:
552:
548:
547:
543:
542:
538:
537:
533:
532:
526:
525:
524:
520:
519:
515:
514:
510:
509:
505:
504:
417:If the image is
389:
382:
381:
341:If the image is
313:
306:
305:
265:If the image is
237:
230:
229:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
975:
974:
970:
969:
968:
966:
965:
964:
945:
944:
901:
832:
797:
761:
697:generate them.
672:quasitruncation
550:
545:
540:
535:
530:
528:
522:
517:
512:
507:
502:
500:
456:
380:
304:
228:
160:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
973:
971:
963:
962:
957:
947:
946:
943:
942:
912:
911:
900:
897:
896:
895:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
781:
750:
749:
740:
733:
724:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
694:star polyhedra
690:
636:
622:
606:
592:
591:
590:
576:quasitruncated
455:
452:
449:
448:
430:
429:
422:
408:
407:
390:
379:
376:
373:
372:
354:
353:
346:
332:
331:
314:
303:
300:
297:
296:
278:
277:
270:
256:
255:
238:
227:
224:
192:
191:
163:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
972:
961:
958:
956:
953:
952:
950:
941:
937:
933:
928:
927:
926:
925:
921:
917:
908:
903:
902:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
881:
880:
879:
875:
871:
851:
847:
843:
836:
831:
830:
829:
825:
821:
817:
816:
815:
811:
807:
801:
796:
795:
794:
790:
786:
782:
780:
776:
772:
765:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
747:
743:
738:
734:
731:
727:
722:
718:
717:
708:
704:
700:
695:
691:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
668:
667:
666:
662:
658:
653:
652:
650:
646:
642:
637:
635:
631:
627:
623:
620:
616:
612:
607:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
572:
571:
570:
566:
562:
558:
498:
494:
493:
488:
484:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
460:
453:
447:
446:
442:
438:
434:
427:
423:
420:
416:
415:
414:
412:
405:
404:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
384:
383:
377:
371:
370:
366:
362:
358:
351:
347:
344:
340:
339:
338:
336:
329:
328:
327:
323:
319:
315:
312:
308:
307:
301:
295:
294:
290:
286:
282:
275:
271:
268:
264:
263:
262:
260:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
232:
231:
225:
223:
222:
218:
214:
211:
206:
205:
201:
197:
190:
186:
182:
178:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
158:2009 comments
157:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
932:Double sharp
913:
870:Double sharp
866:
842:Double sharp
806:Double sharp
771:Double sharp
680:Double sharp
657:Double sharp
580:Double sharp
499:, t{5/3,5},
463:— Preceding
457:
432:
431:
410:
409:
401:
356:
355:
334:
333:
325:
280:
279:
258:
257:
249:
207:
196:Double sharp
193:
161:
137:Low-priority
136:
96:
62:Low‑priority
40:WikiProjects
596:RobertCWebb
411:Don't panic
335:Don't panic
259:Don't panic
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
30:Start-class
949:Categories
905:It is the
557:pentagram
885:Tom Ruen
820:Tom Ruen
785:Tom Ruen
699:Tom Ruen
649:contribs
626:Tom Ruen
619:contribs
561:Tom Ruen
477:contribs
465:unsigned
419:non-free
343:non-free
267:non-free
213:Tom Ruen
181:Tom Ruen
916:Tamfang
835:Tomruen
800:Tomruen
764:Tomruen
139:on the
641:Nernom
611:Nernom
469:Nernom
36:scale.
208:See:
166:Lyamk
936:talk
920:talk
889:talk
874:talk
846:talk
824:talk
810:talk
789:talk
775:talk
703:talk
684:talk
661:talk
645:talk
630:talk
615:talk
600:talk
584:talk
565:talk
473:talk
441:talk
365:talk
289:talk
217:talk
200:talk
185:talk
170:talk
744:to
728:to
131:Low
951::
938:)
922:)
891:)
876:)
848:)
826:)
812:)
791:)
777:)
705:)
686:)
663:)
651:)
647:•
632:)
617:•
602:)
586:)
567:)
479:)
475:•
443:)
435:--
367:)
359:--
291:)
283:--
219:)
202:)
187:)
172:)
164:--
934:(
918:(
909:.
887:(
872:(
844:(
837::
833:@
822:(
808:(
802::
798:@
787:(
773:(
766::
762:@
701:(
682:(
659:(
643:(
628:(
621:)
613:(
598:(
582:(
563:(
471:(
439:(
363:(
287:(
215:(
198:(
183:(
168:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
