386:
365:
21:
329:
235:
208:
245:
101:
317:
177:
396:
500:
Compelling prose: redundant links in ==See also== section to body of text; needs more text on restoration efforts in the creek or discussion why no management is occurring; also plans for future research by govt and private agencies.
342:
218:
696:
347:
701:
629:
Some things would benefit from being made clearer; How long is the stream? Is it (officially defined as) a stream or river? What's its highest and lowest points? Its source?
691:
307:
686:
297:
676:
496:
The article still seems to need some work to reach GA. I will consider this GA review on hold for five days pending resolution of the following comments:
452:
706:
273:
122:
716:
442:
47:
671:
557:
42:
681:
622:}} ), and also needs globalising (i.e. not every user, and I'm particularly thinking small childern and the impaired, knows what or where
602:
418:
258:
213:
38:
41:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
711:
409:
370:
188:
334:
639:
I'd also reiterate the above comment that there needs to be more referencing, particularly for dates, facts and figures;
641:"Recharge for the Sonoma Valley is critical because local rainfall is only about 29 inches (74 centimeters) per annum."
20:
556:
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of
December 14, 2006, compares against the
32:
647:
194:
619:
417:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
272:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
115:
385:
364:
176:
100:
478:
in the watershed; the fact that this creek (really a river) drains one of the two most important
475:
159:
615:
250:
633:
401:
543:
148:
665:
654:
618:
and would benefit from a few significant entries - the inclusion of an infobox (use{{
606:
152:
542:
Thanks for developing this article to its present point, regardless of GA outcome.
479:
155:
133:
234:
207:
527:
NPOV:The word "famed" doesnt belong in the intro unless someone is being quoted.
614:
Further to GA nomination, this article fails criteria 1. a), b), c) and 2.c) of
531:
505:
483:
623:
391:
324:
268:
263:
240:
141:
109:
316:
657:
609:
546:
534:
508:
486:
474:
Importance is rated high because of the large numbers of rare and
414:
145:
636:, the opening section needs to be much more concise/steamlined.
518:
Sources:Could use some additional sources for the amount of text
482:
valleys and hence has national and international recognition.
170:
315:
650:
and posting this article there for high quality feedback.
262:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
108:
A fact from this article appeared on
Knowledge (XXG)'s
77:
524:
Breadth:See comments under prose above to expand text.
567:
For the mostpart (but by no means all of the article)
605:
for consideration. Thanks for your work so far. --
601:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be
413:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
51:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
697:High-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
8:
597:Yes (but infobox and/or diagrams would help)
573:Many dates, facts and figures are unsourced
702:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
359:
202:
56:
15:
692:B-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
361:
204:
174:
282:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California
677:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles
7:
407:This article is within the scope of
256:This article is within the scope of
687:High-importance California articles
504:dup links in see also now removed.
193:It is of interest to the following
427:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Rivers
14:
343:San Francisco Bay Area task force
552:Failed "good article" nomination
394:
384:
363:
327:
243:
233:
206:
175:
99:
19:
707:WikiProject California articles
643:needs referencing for example.
447:This article has been rated as
302:This article has been rated as
285:Template:WikiProject California
158:, and provides a home to many
37:nominee, but did not meet the
1:
717:Low-importance River articles
658:13:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
610:13:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
547:17:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
535:19:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
509:19:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
421:and see a list of open tasks.
340:This article is supported by
335:San Francisco Bay Area portal
276:and see a list of open tasks.
672:Former good article nominees
487:04:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
682:B-Class California articles
648:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review
646:Finally, consider visiting
430:Template:WikiProject Rivers
129:The text of the entry was:
733:
583:4. Neutral point of view?:
453:project's importance scale
308:project's importance scale
45:. Editors may also seek a
558:six good article criteria
446:
379:
323:
301:
228:
201:
59:
55:
571:2. Factually accurate?:
151:, drains the acclaimed
712:B-Class River articles
577:3. Broad in coverage?:
320:
259:WikiProject California
219:San Francisco Bay Area
183:This article is rated
589:5. Article stability?
319:
187:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
144:-designated critical
131:Did you know ...that
39:good article criteria
85:Good article nominee
288:California articles
476:endangered species
410:WikiProject Rivers
321:
189:content assessment
160:endangered species
60:Article milestones
653:Hope that helps,
565:1. Well written?:
467:
466:
463:
462:
459:
458:
358:
357:
354:
353:
251:California portal
169:
168:
94:
93:
78:December 14, 2006
724:
435:
434:
431:
428:
425:
404:
402:Geography portal
399:
398:
397:
388:
381:
380:
375:
367:
360:
337:
332:
331:
330:
290:
289:
286:
283:
280:
253:
248:
247:
246:
237:
230:
229:
224:
221:
210:
203:
186:
180:
179:
171:
103:
80:
57:
23:
16:
732:
731:
727:
726:
725:
723:
722:
721:
662:
661:
554:
494:
492:GA review notes
472:
432:
429:
426:
423:
422:
400:
395:
393:
373:
348:High-importance
333:
328:
326:
304:High-importance
287:
284:
281:
278:
277:
249:
244:
242:
223:High‑importance
222:
216:
184:
165:
164:
127:
76:
12:
11:
5:
730:
728:
720:
719:
714:
709:
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
679:
674:
664:
663:
599:
598:
592:
586:
580:
574:
568:
553:
550:
540:
539:
538:
537:
525:
522:
519:
516:
515:Stability:Pass
513:
512:
511:
493:
490:
471:
468:
465:
464:
461:
460:
457:
456:
449:Low-importance
445:
439:
438:
436:
433:River articles
419:the discussion
406:
405:
389:
377:
376:
374:Low‑importance
368:
356:
355:
352:
351:
339:
338:
322:
312:
311:
300:
294:
293:
291:
274:the discussion
255:
254:
238:
226:
225:
211:
199:
198:
192:
181:
167:
166:
128:
107:
106:
104:
96:
95:
92:
91:
88:
81:
73:
72:
69:
66:
62:
61:
53:
52:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
729:
718:
715:
713:
710:
708:
705:
703:
700:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
673:
670:
669:
667:
660:
659:
656:
651:
649:
644:
642:
637:
635:
630:
627:
625:
621:
620:Infobox_river
617:
612:
611:
608:
604:
596:
593:
590:
587:
584:
581:
578:
575:
572:
569:
566:
563:
562:
561:
559:
551:
549:
548:
545:
536:
533:
529:
528:
526:
523:
520:
517:
514:
510:
507:
503:
502:
499:
498:
497:
491:
489:
488:
485:
481:
477:
469:
454:
450:
444:
441:
440:
437:
420:
416:
412:
411:
403:
392:
390:
387:
383:
382:
378:
372:
369:
366:
362:
349:
346:(assessed as
345:
344:
336:
325:
318:
314:
313:
309:
305:
299:
296:
295:
292:
275:
271:
270:
265:
261:
260:
252:
241:
239:
236:
232:
231:
227:
220:
215:
212:
209:
205:
200:
196:
190:
182:
178:
173:
172:
163:
161:
157:
154:
153:Sonoma Valley
150:
147:
143:
137:
136:
135:
125:
124:
123:June 11, 2006
119:
117:
116:Did you know?
111:
105:
102:
98:
97:
89:
87:
86:
82:
79:
75:
74:
70:
67:
64:
63:
58:
54:
50:
49:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
33:good articles
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
652:
645:
640:
638:
631:
628:
613:
600:
594:
588:
582:
576:
570:
564:
555:
541:
495:
480:Wine Country
473:
448:
408:
341:
303:
267:
257:
195:WikiProjects
156:Wine Country
139:
134:Sonoma Creek
132:
130:
121:
113:
84:
83:
48:reassessment
46:
31:
30:
27:Sonoma Creek
26:
603:resubmitted
595:6. Images?:
521:IMages:Pass
43:renominated
666:Categories
624:California
544:Annasweden
470:Assessment
279:California
269:California
264:U.S. state
214:California
142:California
138:(pictured)
120:column on
90:Not listed
149:watershed
110:Main Page
655:Jhamez84
616:WP:WIAGA
607:Jhamez84
634:WP:LEAD
451:on the
306:on the
185:B-class
146:coastal
112:in the
68:Process
626:is!).
532:Anlace
506:Anlace
484:Anlace
424:Rivers
415:Rivers
371:Rivers
191:scale.
71:Result
29:was a
530:done
632:Per
298:High
140:, a
65:Date
591:Yes
585:Yes
579:Yes
443:Low
266:of
668::
560::
350:).
217::
455:.
310:.
197::
162:?
126:.
118:"
114:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
